gcsf process validation
Embed Size (px)
TRANSCRIPT

Seediscussions,stats,andauthorprofilesforthispublicationat:http://www.researchgate.net/publication/282652909
ProcessvalidationofrecombinantHumanGranulocyteColonyStimulatingFactorforbulkproduction
CONFERENCEPAPER·OCTOBER2015
READS
2
14AUTHORS,INCLUDING:
SyedMonim
InceptaPharmaceuticalCompanyLtd.
8PUBLICATIONS6CITATIONS
SEEPROFILE
TarifulIslam
InceptaPharmaceuticalsLimited
3PUBLICATIONS3CITATIONS
SEEPROFILE
Availablefrom:SyedMonim
Retrievedon:08October2015

CHARACTERIZATION RH-GCSF ACCORDING TO EP GUIDELINE & OTHER NON-COMPENDIAL TESTS
Process Validation of Recombinant Human Granulocyte Colony Stimulating Factor for Bulk ProductionSyed Abdul Monim, Md. Ehtashamul Haque, Ataur Rahman, Tariful Islam, Md. Nasim Ferdous Kallol, Md. Rashed Nahid Rana, A. G. M. Rakibuzzaman, Md. Jahidul Islam, Abdul
Wadud Molla, Fahima Akter Mukta, Romana Akter, Mohammad Maududul Huq, Mohammad Shamsul Islam and Md. Iqbal Hassan Khan*Research and Development, Biotechnology Derived Product Facility, Incepta Pharmaceuticals Ltd, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
*Correspondence to [email protected]
rh-GCSF was characterized according to the EP (European Pharmacopeia) guideline whichcomplied all the specifications. The formulated rh-GCSF is now under preclinical trail and theclinical trial will be conducted soon.
CONCLUSION
To claim the synthesized drug as a biosimilar, several tests have been executed in accordance with European Pharmacopeia (EP) guideline and other non-compendial tests. Among them physical appearance, biological activity, peptide mapping, related protein, impurities profiling by Size ExclusionChromatography and SDS-PAGE, endotoxin level, host cell protein, host cell DNA, isoelectric focusing, intact mass, amino acid sequence and sterility of theproduct have been mentioned.
Designed by: Syed Abdul Monim, Md. Ehtashamul Haque & Md. Nasim Ferdous Kallol
CLONE CHARACTERIZATION
Host Cell Protein (HCP)
Isoelectric Focusing
REGULATORY CONSIDERATIONS FOR PROCESS VALIDATION
Good Documentation Practices(GDP) Environment, Health & Safety(EHS)
MANUFACTURING PROCESS
Recombinant human Granulocyte Colony Stimulating Factor (rh-GCSF) is a proteinconsisting of 175 amino acid expressed in E. coli which plays a vital role in the treatment ofcancer patients receiving Chemotherapy and patients with different categories ofneutropenia. Rh-GCSF was approved as a drug under the name of Filgrastim (INN) by theEU on August 22, 2002 and the innovator is Amgen. It is a 1.2-1.4 billion dollar per yearproduct for Amgen. It has 8 biosimilars in the market approved by EMA but the price is toohigh for the mass population of developing country like Bangladesh, where Cancer is now agreat concern. In this regard Incepta has taken the challenge to produce Filgrastimbiosimilar in Bangladesh. Following is the roadmap to the validation of rh-GCSF productionprocess.•Clone construction, Master cell bank & Working cell bank preparation•R & D scale production and fixing scale for commercial production• Optimizing process for Commercial scale•Finally process validation done following the Guidelines of ICH and EMA•Accelerated and real time stability study is going on•Pre-clinical study has been passed & commercial production will be done following the
successful clinical trial.
IN-PROCESS QUALITY CONTROL
METHOD OF EXECUTION
Sterility of the Product
State of art Equipments
Host Cell DNA
Tests Specifications results
Identity
Gram's staining Gram negative
Identification of culture as E.Coli (Growth on MacConkey Agar)
Identified as E.Coli
Restriction Digestion Release two fragments of 528bp & 4305bp
DNA sequencing Matched with reference Filgrastim sequence
Purity Fungal or Bacterial contamination No groth on Cetrimide and Mannitol Salt Agar
Stability Not less than 75% of cells with Plasmid DNA 82.80%
Plasmid Copy number
More than 100 copies of plasmid per cell 149 copies
Viability Growth in Kanamycin containing media After overnight culture OD was 1.5
1.32 1.37 1.2
8.4 8.58
0
2
4
6
8
10
Batch 1 Batch 2 Batch 3
Seed culture time and final OD in three validation batches
Final OD at600nm
Timetaken(Hour)
537 531 535
127 115 122
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
Batch 1 Batch 2 Batch 3
Biomass & Inclusion Bodies found in three validation batches
Biomass AfterFermentation(gm)
TotalInclusionBodies (gm)
0
5
10
15
20
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
OD
at 6
00
nm
Fermentation Hour
Growth Curve of Fermentation (Bath 1)
0
5
10
15
20
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
OD
at
60
0n
m
Fermentation Hour
Growth Curve of Fermentation (Batch 2)
0
5
10
15
20
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
OD
at
60
0n
m
Fermentation Hour
Growth Curve of Fermentation (Batch 3)
Fig: Identity of clone checked by DNA sequencing & matched in NCBI(BLAST)
Fig: Purity checked by Plating in Ca & MSA plate
Lane No Sample Name Protein %
1 protein MWmarker NA
2 Standard GCSF NA
3 Blank -
4 Fermentation 4th hour 41.98
5 Fermentation 8th hour 46.30
6 Fermentation 12th hour 62.02
7 Fermentation Final hour 65.87
Fig: SDS PAGE of different hour Fermrntation sample(Batch 1)
Batch No Step Total Protein (gm) Amount of GCSF Percentage of Recovery
1
IB Sol.
17.74 N/A N/A
2 16.63 N/A N/A
3 18.7 N/A N/A
1
Reduction
16.63 N/A N/A
2 16.08 N/A N/A
3 17.20 N/A N/A
1
Refolding
N/A 12.87 72.55
2 N/A 12.18 73.24
3 N/A 13.19 70.53
1
Buffer Exchange-1
N/A 9.8 55.24
2 N/A 9.7 58.33
3 N/A 10.6 56.68
1
Cation Exchange-1
N/A 9.0 50.73
2 N/A 9.1 54.72
3 N/A 9.4 50.27
1
Buffer Exchange-2
N/A 8.7 49.04
2 N/A 8.7 52.32
3 N/A 9.0 48.13
1
Cation Exchange-2
N/A 7.5 42.28
2 N/A 7.6 45.7
3 N/A 7.9 42.25
Data from Upstream
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
116.0
97.466.2
45.0
31.0
21.5
14.4KD
65.87 66.64 70.32
0
20
40
60
80
Batch 1 Batch 2 Batch 3
Percentage of rh-GCSF expression from SDS PAGE
Percentageof rh-GCSFexpression
Data for standard curve
SampleConcentration
(ng/mL)Absorbance
1Absorbance
2Average
AbsorbanceStandard 0 0.096 0.091 0.094Standard 1 0.099 0.097 0.098Standard 3 0.137 0.128 0.133Standard 12 0.267 0.265 0.266Standard 40 0.656 0.664 0.660Standard 100 1.476 1.525 1.501
Host Cell Protein (HCP) calculation of Three BatchesAbsorbanc
eIntercept of Std.
CurveSlope of Std.
CurveConcentration of
HCPBatch 1 0.119 0.091 0.014 0.003Batch 2 0.475 0.071 0.009 0.044Batch 3 0.564 0.071 0.009 0.054
8.6
7.2
6.6
5.9
5.1
4.6
3.6
Lane No. 1 2 3
Analysis Information:
Sample Loading
Information
SI. No. Sample NameLoading Volume
(µL)
Loading Amount
(µg)
1 pI marker, 20 NA
2Standard
Filgrastim(NIBSC)20 5.78
3 rh-GCSF batch 1 20 5.75
Type of Gel pH: 3-10 IEF Gel (Invitrogen)
Sample Buffer
Invitrogen
Type of Staining
Brilliant Blue G Colloidal
Result/Observation: The Isoelectric point of the samples is between 5.7 and 6.3
pIMarker
Bacterial Endotoxin Test
Impurities
110 kDa
80 kDa
50 kDa
30 kDa
20 kDa
15 kDa
10 kDa
Lane No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
110 kDa
80 kDa
50 kDa
30 kDa
20 kDa
15 kDa
10 kDa
Lane No 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Sample : Batch 1
We are very much grateful to the following persons for their cordial help during every step of this bulk production process validation:
Mr. Abdullah Sarker, Mr. Javed Jahangir, Mr. Raquibur Rahman, Mr. Ashadullah Hill Galib, Mr. Hasan Manjur Qadir, Mr. Inan Ishraque, Mr. Syed Morsalin Ali, Mr. Saidul Islam, Ms. Raznin Akter,, Mr. S.K.Rafiqul Islam, Mr. Aminur Talukder, Mr. Siraj Mollah, Mr. Saiful Islam Khan, Mr. Rashidul Islam, Mr. Billal Hossen, Mr. Sayed Hossen, Mr. Hasibul Islam, Mr. Anwar Hosen, Mr. Likhon Islam
Bioassay for potency calculation
L-1: Cell Control; L-2 to 6: Reference Std.; L-7 to 11: R&D rhG-CSF
Analysis Information:
Standard NIBSC-GCSF
Detection method MTT Assay
Cell type NFS-60
Detection filter 570 nm
Statistical method of analysisParallel Line Assay
Data:
Stated % IU/mg%
Estimated
Stated potency - 100000000 -
Estimated potency 81.54 82000000 -
Lower confidence limit
61.25 61000000 75.1
Higher confidence limit
108.20 110000000 132.7
Result/Observation:
Sample activity (IU/mg)
8.2x 107
Sample activity (IU/mL)
-
17.7412.87
72.55
16.6312.18
73.24
18.713.19
70.53
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Total Protein for rh-GCSFpurification (gm)
Amount of rh-GCSF (gm) Percentage of Recovery
rh-GCSF Recovery at Refolding
Batch1
Batch2
17.74
9.8
55.24
16.63
9.7
58.33
18.7
10.6
56.68
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Total Protein for rh-GCSFpurification (gm)
Amount of rh-GCSF (gm) Percentage of Recovery
rh-GCSF Recovery at Buffer Exchange 1
Batch1Batch2Batch3
17.74
8.7
49.04
16.63
8.7
52.32
18.7
9.0
48.13
0
20
40
60
80
Total Protein for rh-GCSFpurification (gm)
Amount of rh-GCSF (gm) Percentage of Recovery
rh-GCSF Recovery at Buffer Exchange 2
Batch1
Batch2
Batch3
17.74
9.0
50.73
16.63
9.1
54.72
18.7
9.4
50.27
0
20
40
60
Total Protein for rh-GCSFpurification (gm)
Amount of rh-GCSF (gm) Percentage of Recovery
rh-GCSF Recovery at Cation Exchange 1
Batch1Batch2Batch3
17.74
7.5
42.28
16.63
7.6
45.7
18.7
7.9
42.25
0
10
20
30
40
50
Total Protein for rh-GCSFpurification (gm)
Amount of rh-GCSF (gm) Percentage of Recovery
rh-GCSF Recovery at Cation Exchange 2
Batch1Batch2Batch3
Fig: Data of ESI-TOF MS at CExFig: Chromatogram of Refolding sampleFig: Chromatogram of Reduction sampleFig: Gran staining image of Seed culture and
Fermentation
For all the three consecutive batches, reproducible data have been achieved. The OD of seedculture, duration of seed culture and fermentation, growth pattern, the Yields of upstream(Biomass & Inclusion Bodies), percentage desired protein expression were in a similarfashion.
Fig: HVAC system
Peptide mapping was done using both RP-HPLC and MassSpectrometry. A Reference Standard (here NIBSC standard) isalso processed in a same way of the sample and analyzedsimultaneously.
Peptide Mapping & comparison with CRS
Data of Peptide Mapping (ESI-TOF MS)Chromatograms of Peptide Mapping (RP-HPLC)
Sample
Standard (NIBSC)
We have used NFS-60 Cell line and double parallel line assaymethod. A Reference Standard (here NIBSC standard) wasused with sample for the assay. The data of standard andsample were plotted and the parallelism is observed.
Related Proteins
Reference Standard (NIBSC)
Rh-GCSF
Related protein assay was used todetermine the similar proteins otherthan rh-GCSF. The purity of our rh-GCSF was more than 99.0%
We have used ELISA to determine whetherany Cell wall protein or protein fragment
Isoelectric Point (pI) of all the samples ofour batches complied with the standard(NIBSC )
We have used the Real-Time PCR methodto detect whether host DNA or itsfragment is present in the product or not.
Chromatogram of Size Exclusion Chromatography
Non-Reducing gel
Reducing gel
The rh-GCSF were tested for any otherprotein impurities by Size ExclusionChromatography and SDS-PAGE. Thepurity of our rh-GCSF was more than99.0% for all the validation batches.
•The samples from validation batches are analyzed for sterility according to EP.
The maximum limit of endotoxinis 2.0IU/mg for rh-GCSF and allof our product from validationbatches passed this criteria.
Fig: Cleaning is going on in the ‘C’ area
Fig: Cleaning of the corridor at the entry of ‘C’ area
Fig: Laminar flow Cabinet & Double Door Autoclave
Fig: Area Monitoring
Fig: Simplified diagram of our production area mentioning man & material flow. Red and green arrow for material and man flow respectively.
Production area is fully classified area. The Final purification area is ‘Class B’ (pink marked) andthe all other area is ‘Class C’ (white). Remotely controlled CIP/SIP /DIP system for upstreamarea. Total area is under strict environment monitoring according to regulatory guideline.
Fig: HVAC system
Total logbook
140
Room condition Monitoring- 44
Machine & Equipment- 48
Maintenance - 48
SOP
55
Process SOP
7
Machine & Equipment
48
Upstream
10
Downstream
14
General
24
• Each and every work is documented properly • All the following documents are updated regularly to maintain c-GMP practice.• A screen shot of BMR is given here.
Fig: Snap of BMR
• We are highly aware of EHS policy.• Biological samples are handled under Biosafety Cabinet, and Acids or volatile liquids are dispensed under Fume hood.
Fig: screen shot of MSDS Fig: Carrying acids Fig: Dispensing of acids
Fig: Working under Biosafety cabinet
• We have equipments from world leader brands.• All the equipments are under CMC or AMC to ensure proper function all the time.• Calibration of the equipments are done regularly to get reproducible results. • Employee of Incepta Biotech are sent abroad to be well trained for using all the equipments.
Applied Biosystems DNA sequencer
AB Sciex ESI-TOF MS Dionex UHPLC Akta Ready (GE)
Bioengineering 100L Fermenter Applied Biosystems Real-Time PCR
Akta Pilot (GE)
Working Cell Bank
Kans
,Absent
Screening for best clone using plate containing
Kanamycin
Kanr
Present
Best clone
Grow in flask
Store at -80ºC
Glycerine stock (Master Cell Bank)
Clone characterization
MCBLB plate of transformed cell
Pre Inoculum preparation in
TB mediaFermentation
Optimization of the process, Process Validation followed by risk assessment and cleaning validation
Pre-clinical Study Clinical TrailMarketing of the product
SEED CULTURE
Fig: Fermenter Fig: Fermentation batch monitoring record
The E. Coli cells are cultured in a controlled pH, temperature, air flow & agitation.
FERMENTATION
Fig: Centrifuge Fig: Cell Disruptor
HARVESTING & CELL DISRUPTION
Fig: Centrifuge to collect washed IB
Fig: IB mixing with wash buffer
WASH OF INCLUSION BODIES(IB)
Fig: IB Solubilization
IB SOLUBILIZATION & REDUCTION
Fig: Refolding in 4-6°C with Argon gas flush
REFOLDING
Fig: TFF for buffer exchange
BUFFER EXCHANGE-1CHROMATOGRAPHY -1
Fig: Process Columns
Dataf ile Name:RNDGCSF002-Final.lcdSample Name:RNDGCSF002-FinalSample ID:RNDGCSF002-Final
0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 min
-100
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
mAU215nm4nm (1.00)
11
.39
2
Fig: Chromatogram of CExsample
CHROMATOGRAPHY -2BUFFER EXCHANGE-2
Fig: TFF SystemFig: Tangential Flow Filtration
(TFF) for buffer exchange
BUFFER EXCHANGE FOR FORMULATION
Fig: Sterile filtration under Laminar air flow
STERILE FILTRATION
The below mentioned process steps were optimized for producing rh-GCSF. These steps were executed repeatedly during the process validation batches.
We have taken 110g Inclusion bodies in every batches for downstream processing. The percentage of recovery in every steps and final yield of protein were almost similar.
According to validation sampling plan, in process samples were taken and analyzed fortracking the process at various time intervals. Gram staining, SDS-PAGE, HPLC, LC-MSanalysis were done in various steps.
INTRODUCTION
Process Development Scale determination
Process Optimization
Process Validation followed by risk assessment & cleaning
validation
Product characterization
Stability studies(Real time & accelerated)
Before starting validation batch the clone has been characterized and the results are shown in following table:
A PARADIGM OF TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH
Data from DownstreamRESULTS & DISCUSSION
Fig. Sterility test of rh-GCSF
= Pass-box = Door = Material Flow = Man Flow
from host cell ispresent in theproduct or not.
GMP COMPLIANT AREA