implementation of protected area management plans and their … · 2020. 5. 29. · methodology of...

1

Implementation of Protected Area Management Plans and their Results

Workshop Report Organizers:

1. Protected Area Management Department, Ministry of Nature, Environment and Tourism

2. WWF Mongolia Programme Office 3. Commmunity Based Conservation of Biodiversity in

Altai Sayan Region

08-09 December 2008

Khovd Aimag

2

Acknowledgements Great thanks to the colleagues of Protected Area Management Department of

Ministry of Nature Environment and Tourism and the Community Based Biodiversity Conservation of Altai Sayan that jointly organized the workshop on Implementation of Protected Area Management Plans and their Results.

It is our pleasure to express the deepest graditute to all of you for our close cooperation towards great success in terms of environmental conservation efforts.

For more detailed information on the workshop, please contact with the following addresses:

Yo. Onon, Wildlife Programme Manager, WWF Mongolia, [email protected] O. Munkhtogtokh, Conservation Specialist, Altai Sayan Branch, WWF Mongolia, [email protected] Telephone: +976-11-311659

A Table of Contents Brief Introduction on Workshop........................................................................................................... 3 Methodology of Management Plan Implementation Appraisal............................................................ 3 Overall assessment of PA management plans ...................................................................................... 4 Most immediate or important tasks to be dealt with in the future: ....................................................... 6 Appendix 1............................................................................................................................................ 9 Workshop participants .......................................................................................................................... 9 Appendix 2.......................................................................................................................................... 11 Appendix 3.......................................................................................................................................... 15 Management Plans for PAs in Altai Sayan Eco-Region and overall assessment findings & results (1. Management plan issues & 2. Protected Areas) ................................................................................. 15

3

Brief Introduction on Workshop With the purpose to assess the implementation of management plan for Protected

Area in Altai Sayan Eco-Region in Western Mongolia, to share experiences, and jointly identify main challenges encountered the management plan implementation, the workshop on Implementation of Protected Area Management Plans and their Results was organized in Khovd Aimag center on 08-09 December, 2008.

The workshop was attended by 25 specialists and management team members from

seven Protected Area Administrations that manage and supervise six Strictly Protected Areas, 10 National Conservation Parks, and two Nature Reserves that lie in Altai Sayan Eco-Region. The Protected Areas in the eco-region are very specific with their ecological conditions that include alpine, tundra, flat plains, forest steppe ecosystems and internationally important wetlands (listed to the RAMSAR Convention).

In order to ensure adequate efficient enforcement and upgrade the Protected Area

conservation regimes, the management plans are developed and implemented for Protected Areas. At the moment, management plans for Khokh Serkh, Myangan Ugalzat and Munkh-khairkhan Protected Areas in the Altai Sayan Eco-Region are being developed and discussed by relevant stakeholders. The rest of Protected Areas in the eco-region, have had their management plans and the plans are in progress of their implementation. Some of the Protected Areas have had their second management plans that are in their development and approval phases.

Up to now, no any specific review or assessment on implementation process of

Protected Area management plans has been conducted. However, this workshop was designed to assess or review the implementation process of Protected Areas in the eco-region through development and use of a methodology for PA management plan appraisal.

Methodology of Management Plan Implementation Appraisal Basically, a management plan for Protected Area consists of the following three parts:

Part one: covers mostly research data and findings particularly on biological

diversity, natural features, and resources of the Protected Area. Accordingly, the part one includes all relevant research findings and information on wildlife (plant and animal) species, forests, water resources, soil erosion, tourism activities, historical and cultural sites and their current states.

Part two: covers all reasearch findings and data relavant to potential and actual

threats and pressure to the biodiversity, natural resources. The part two also includes descriptions of living conditions of local communities, population, levels of ecological education, seasonal movements and settlements of herders (land use practices), animal husbandry, pastureland degredation, and overgrazing, illegal hunting, mining operations, tourism activities, infrastructural development, ubsustainable use of non-timber forest products and woody plants, fires, and climatic change impacts.

Part three: covers management options for reduction and elimination of potential and actual threat and pressure causes. This part also covers public awareness activities,

4

monitoring and patrolling, options for improvement of public participation, restoration activities, Protected Area management and material resources, and budget.

The impelementaion of the activities relevant to three parts above mentioned was

assessed with 0-5 scores. Appraisal or Ranking values: 0- The issue is not contigent/relevant to the PA. 1- Ongoing implementation of the activity is 1-20 per cent. 2- Ongoing implementation of the activity is 21-40 per cent. 3- Ongoing implementation of the activity is 41-60 per cent. 4- Ongoing implementation of the activity is 61-80 per cent. 5- Ongoing implementation of the activity is 81-100 per cent. For appraisal, we assessed the implementation of management plans of specific PA

setting a period of time.

Overall assessment of PA management plans Regarding the implementation of research and monitoring on biological diversity and

natural resources that are required to be immediately conducted throughout the PA system of Altai Sayan Eco-Region, as stated in the management plans, the 50-60 per cent of forest, fauna, and water have been completed so far. However, the 34-42 % researches and monitoring on soil erosion, tourism and historically and culturally significant areas have been completed (Graph1). Overall, the 55-62% of activities stated in the management plans for Turgen and Tsagaan Shuvuut SPAs, and Siilhem, Munkh-khairhan, and Khovsgol NCPs have been implemented, while the implementation of researches and monitoring on biodiversity and natural resources stated in the management plans for Ulaan Taiga and Altan Els SPA and Tsambagarav, Myangan Ugalzat and Devel Aral NCPs is unsatisfactory or 27-40 % (Diagram 1).

53.5%60.2% 65.0%

42.1%

61.0%

34.7%

46.5%39.8% 35.0%

57.9%

39.0%

65.3%

0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

100.0%

120.0%

Fauna Flora Forest Soil erosion Water Researches ontourism,

historically andculturally

significantareas

Implemetation rate (in per cent) Uncompleted tasks or gaps implementation (in per cent)

Diagram 1. Accomplishment of researches and monitoring on current status of biodiversity and natural resources

5

Among the researches and monitoring on potential and actual threats and pressures to biodiversity and natural resources throughout the Proteected Area system in Altai Sayan Eco-Region, the researches on ecological education of local communities residing the PAs and infrastructural impacts have been conducted unsatisfactorily (or 43-49 %) (Diagram 2).

70.5% 72.6%

43.1%

67.8% 61.1%71.6% 63.1% 63.5% 58.7% 66.3%

49.1% 56.9%

29.5% 27.4%

56.9%

32.2% 38.9%28.4% 36.9% 36.5% 41.3% 33.7%

50.9% 43.1%

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2Li

ving

con

ditio

ns o

f loc

al c

omm

unitie

s

Popu

latio

n

Leve

ls o

f eco

logi

cal e

duca

tion

Seas

onal

mov

emen

ts a

nd s

ettle

men

ts o

fhe

rder

s (la

nd u

se p

ract

ices

)

Anim

al h

usba

ndry

, pas

ture

land

degr

edat

ion,

and

ove

rgra

zing

Poac

hing

Min

ing

Tour

ism

Fire

Clim

atic

cha

nge

impa

cts

Infra

stru

ctur

e

Ubs

usta

inab

le u

se o

f non

-tim

ber f

ores

tpr

oduc

ts a

nd w

oody

pla

nts


Diagram 2. Researches and monitoring on potential and actual threats and pressures to the biodiversity and other natural resources

According to the assessment findings, the research and monitoring on potential and

actua threats and pressures to biodiversity and natural resources in Khokh Serkh and Ulaan Taiga SPAs has been conducted unsatisfactorily (or 35-45 %).

61.5 per cent of public awareness activities, 70.5 per cent of community participation tasks, 71.2 per cent of patrolling and monitoring, 58.1 per cent of restoration activities, 60.6 per cent of administration and managemen tasks, and 55.5 per cent of material resources as stated in management plans for PAs in Altai Sayan Eco-Region have been completed and undertaken (Diagram 3).

6

61.5%70.5% 71.2%

58.1% 60.6% 55.5%

38.5%29.5% 28.8%

41.9% 39.4% 44.5%

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

90.0%

100.0%

Public awarenessactivities

Options forimprovement of

public participation

Monitoring andpatrolling

Restorationactivities

Protected Areamanagement

Budget


Diagram 3. Accomplishment of activities or tasks dealing with reduction of potential and actual threats and pressures to the diversity stated in management plans for PAs

Demarcation within PAs has been unsatisfactorily (or 45 %) accomplished, issuance

of powers of environmental inspectors to PA rangers is 30 %, and capacity building of rangers is 53.3 %. According to the overall accomplishment of management plan activities the public awareness activities have been successfully conducted in Uvs Nuur Basin SPA, Sharga Mankhan NR, and Khovsgul NCP. However, the public awareness activities wer unsatisfactorily (or 50 %) conducted in Mongol Altai Nuruu, Khasagt Khairkhan and Khoridol Saridag SPAs.

Accomplishment of patrolling and monitoring within PAs is more thant 60 %. Among the PAs, Uvs Nuur Basin SPA administration is successfully dealing with the tasks.

Regarding the improvement of community participation in natural resource management, the task has been unsatisfactorily dealt with.

According to the overall assessment findings, the conseravation tasks stated in the management plan for Sharga Mankhan NR, Uvs Nuur Basin SPA, and Khovsgol NCP have been successfully undertaken. Nevertheless, the conservation tasks stated in the management plans for Ulaan Taiga SPA and Devel NR has been unsatisfactorily implemented.

Based on the findings and results above mentioned, the Recommendations on focus on potential improvement for 2009 have been made.

Most immediate or important tasks to be dealt with in the future: Workshop participants identified the most immediate or important tasks to be dealt

with for 2009 e.g. studies on ecological education of local communities, improvement of community participation in natural resource management, capacity building of rangers and researchers and specialists, demarcation of PAs, and improvement/ upgrading of conservation management of Devel NR and recommended the following tasks to jointly deal with:

7

1. Conduct studies on ecological education of local communities:

• Researchers and specialists of Uvs Nuur Basin SPA administration will develop research methodologies by 1 February 2009 and distribute the draft methodologies to other PA administration for comments;

• PA administrations shall post their research reports on www.econet.mn by 01 May 2009 for information sharing having sent them to WWF Mongolia,

2. Improvement of community participation in natural resource management:

• WWF Mongolia and a project Community based Conservation of Biodiversity in Altai Sayan region will jointly organize a workshop on community participation for PA specialists and rangers in Uvs Aimag in the first half of March 2009.

• Khar Us Nuur NCP administration will organize a festival of community group development in Khovd Aimag in September 2009.

3. Demarcation:

• In overall, demarcation of PAs in Altai Sayan region is poor. Due to poor demarcation throughout the PAs, it is unclear where the PAs lie and the PAs are hardly recognized. Thus, PAs in the region need immediate demarcation. Some PAs need repairing or renewing demarcation points. PA administrations need to have required funds for demarcation through allocating funds in their annual budgets. The PA administrations have been assigned with the task to estimate required funds, submit to MNE for approval and commence the tasks immediately.

• It has been agreed to renew and update the nformation bulleten boards at their expenses.

4. Improvement of current Devel NR conservation management:

• Conduct researches and assessments on biodiversity; • Assess the current status of natural resource uses and make recommendations

on improved conservation management; • Implement community participation based conservation management; • Have conservation regimes approved by respective Aimag Citizen’s

Representative Khurals and Governors and follow up their enforcement; 5. Capacity building of rangers:

• Training on research methodology of fish resources; • Training on methodologies on planting of very rare plants by their seeds; • Training on improvement of presentation and reporting skills for rangers; • Training for improvement of biological education/knowledge for rangers; • Training/ workshop on forest management; • Training/workshop on identification of pastureland reserves and carrying capacity

and monitoring methodologies;

8

At the end of workshop, the participants have agreed the PA administrations would annually do (regularize) their self assessment having dealth with the achievements and lessons learnt as well as sharing experiences. They have agreed to organize 2009 self assessment meeting at Khovsgol NCP administration in September 2009.

WWF Mongolia organizes on-line training on Protected Areas-Eco Tourism from

10 to 2 December for specialists and researchers of PAs in Altai Sayan Eco-Region. The host organization introduced and handed in technical methodological instructions to participants. Researchers and specialists including Nazguli and Amanbek from Mongol Altai SPA administration, Narantsetseg, Jamyanjav, Khulganaa, and Purevdorj from Khovsgol Nuur NCP, Javzansuren from Uvs Nuur Basin SPA, Ganzorig and Tseveensuren from Khar Us Nuur NCP, Jargaltsetseg, Olonbaatar, and Tsetsegbadam from Sharga Mankhan NR and Bayanmunkh and Bayarsaikhan from Munkh-khairkhan NCP will attend the upcoming online training. Training on Protected Areas-Eco Tourism consists of four sections and each section has its exams. The participants, who will attend the upcoming training, will take final exam on 26 December.

9

Appendix 1.

Workshop participants № Names

Orgnizations & job titles Contact address:

1

Yo. Onon

WWF Mongolia о[email protected] 99041045

2

D. Chinbat

Khar Us Nuur SPA administration [email protected] 99439815, 0143222539

3

T. Lkhagvadorj

Munkh-khairkhan NCP administration

Munkhkhairkhan soum of Khovd aimag

4

Kh. Purevdorj Khovsgol NCP administration Khatgal, Khovsgol 98388454

5

Z. Nyambayar Land Use Agency, Khovsgol aimag [email protected] 99156669

6

B. Buyantsog Uvs Nuur Basin PA administration Byantsog_Uvs2001yahoo.com

7

J. Tomorsukh Local coordinator of project Altai Sayan, Khovsgol region

[email protected] 98380050

8

S. Narantsetseg Khovsgol NCP administration 99760664

9

R. Jamsran Uvs Nuur Basin PA administration 99453121

10

Kh. Dashdendev Environmental Protection Agency, Khovsgol aimag

88385441

11

S. Sukhtsooj Environmental Protection Agency, Khovd aimag

99237004

12

B. Tseveensuren

Ecologist –Engineer, Durgun hydro-power station


13 A. Tseveen-oidov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Khovd aimag

99438691

14 B. Gandolgor Munkh-khairkhan NCP administration

98437943

15

G. Bayanmunkh Munkh-khairkhan NCP administration

98437955

16 Kh. Eleuciz Khokh Serkh Nuruu SPA 95428947 17 J. Jancerik Khokh Serkh Nuruu SPA 98428884 18 I.Sapergul Director of Khokh Serkh Nuruu SPA 98429292

19 A. Altai Mongol Altai Nuruu PA

administration [email protected] 99429864

20

G. Amanbek Specialist of Mongol Altai Nuruu PA administration

98424646

21

Kh. Nazgul

Specialist of Mongol Altai Nuruu PA administration


22

L. Tudev

Director of Govi-Altai Aimag EPA

[email protected] 99489119, 98050419 ажил 24955

10

23

G. Olonbayar Specialist of Govi-altai aimag EPA [email protected] 99687613

24

A. Khasbaatar Specialist of Khar Us Nuur Vicinity PAs’ administration

99474884, 24088

25

D. Erdenechimeg

Specialist of Khar Us Nuur Vicinity PAs’ administration

95438010

26

B. Ganzorig Specialist of Khar Us Nuur Vicinity PAs’ administration

99865221, 88435221 [email protected]

27

A. Askhar Khokh Serkh Nuruu SPA administration

28

A. Bauirjan Khokh Serkh Nuruu SPA administration

29

T. Enkhtsagaan Driver, Munkh-khairkhan NCP administration

30 N. Batnasan Community based Conservation of

Biodiversity in Altai Sayan Eco-Region

[email protected]

11

Appendix 2 Management Plans for PAs in Altai Sayan Eco-Region and overall assessment findings & results (quantative results)

Tasks & Activities under assessment

Siilh

em

Alta

i Tav

an B

ogd

Tsam

bvag

arav

Dev

el

Khok

h Se

rkh

Kha

r Us

Nuu

r

Mya

ngan

Uga

lzat

Mun

kh- k

hairk

han

Turg

en

Tsga

aan

shuv

uut

Uvs

Nuu

r

Khan

Khp

hii

Khy

arga

s N

uur

Alta

n E

ls

Ula

an T

aiga

Khor

idol

Sar

idag

Kho

vsgo

l

Kha

sagt

Kha

irkha

n

Shar

ga M

ankh

an

Snow leapord 2 2 1 0 2 1 1 2 5 5 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 3 0 Argali sheep 4 4 2 0 4 5 4 4 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 1 0 Ibex 4 4 2 0 4 4 3 4 3 3 0 0 0 0 1 2 2 4 0 Saiga antelope 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 Marmot 4 4 0 0 3 2 1 4 2 2 0 2 0 0 0 2 3 3 0 Red deer 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 Musk deer 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 3 3 0 0 Deer 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 4 2 2 0 3 0 0 2 3 3 3 0 Roe deer 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 2 4 4 0 0 Wild pig 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 1 1 1 1 0 0 2 4 4 0 0

Total scores 20 25 15 5 25 30 25 30 25 30 10 20 0 0 30 40 40 25 5 Acquired scores 14 15 5 1 14 18 10 20 17 22 2 7 0 0 9 23 22 14 5

Total (mammals) 70.0 60.0 33.3 20.0 56.0 60.0 40.0 66.7 68.0 73.3 20.0 35.0 0.0 0.0 30.0 57.5 55.0 56.0 100.0 Fish 0 1 0 1 3 1 0 2 0 0 2 0 2 1 1 0 2 0 0 Birds 0 3 0 3 3 3 1 3 1 1 4 1 4 1 1 2 4 1 2

Faun

a

Other species 0 4 0 0 2 3 3 1 3 3 Rare plants 4 4 1 1 3 5 2 2 4 4 1 1 1 1 1 3 4 2 2

Medicinal and other useful plants 4 4 1 1 3 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 2 2

Flor

a

OIthers 3 3 1 2 3

Forests 0 4 4 4 1 2 1 4 5 5 5 5 0 0 2 3 3 3 1 Soil degradation/erosion 1 1 1 1 1 4 1 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 1 1 2 3 3

Stud

ies/

Res

earc

h on

cur

rent

situ

atio

n

Water & its resources 4 4 4 4 2 1 3 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 1 2 4 3 4

12

Tourism activities & historically & culturally important sites

1 2 1 1 1 2 2 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 3 Total scores 45 65 45 45 65 70 60 70 65 70 50 55 35 35 70 75 80 60 40

Acquired scores 28 28 17 17 31 37 22 43 35 40 22 22 15 11 18 40 47 31 22

Total (in per cent) 62.2 43.1 37.8 37.8 47.7 52.9 36.7 61.4 53.8 57.1 44.0 40.0 42.9 31.4 25.7 53.3 58.8 51.7 55.0 Livelihood of local communities 3 3 3 1 3 4 4 5 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 2 3 4

Population 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 2 3 Ecological education of communities 2 2 2 2 2 4 3 2 2 2 1 2 1 1 1 3 3 3 3

Seasonal movements & settlements of herders (land use practices)

3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 4 4 4 4 4 4 0 4 4 2 4

Animal husbandry & overgrazing 3 3 3 3 1 4 3 3 4 5 2 4 2 2 0 4 4 2 3

Illegal hunting 4 4 4 4 2 4 3 2 5 5 5 4 4 4 1 2 2 4 5 Mining 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 2 4 5 5 5 5 5 1 0 3 0 1 Tourism 2 2 2 0 0 4 1 3 5 5 5 5 5 5 1 2 3 3 1

Fire frequency, outbreaks & damages incurred 0 1 0 1 1 4 1 3 5 5 4 4 5 5 2 2 2 2 0

Climate change 4 4 4 4 3 5 3 2 5 5 3 3 2 4 1 1 4 3 3 Infrastructure 3 3 3 3 0 4 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 3

Forests, woody plants & non-timber forest products 2 4 4 4 2 1 2 3 4 4 3 3 5 4 1 1 2 3 2

Res

earc

h on

pre

ssur

e im

pact

s

Others 2 2 0 0 4 3 0 2 2

Total scores 55 60 50 50 45 55 60 60 55 60 55 55 55 55 45 55 60 55 55

Acquired scores 30 33 31 28 21 41 32 33 46 48 40 42 41 42 16 28 34 29 32

Total (in per cent) 54.5 55.0 62.0 56.0 46.7 74.5 53.3 55.0 83.6 80.0 72.7 76.4 74.5 76.4 35.6 50.9 56.7 52.7 58.2 Community 2 2 2 2 2 3 2 4 5 5 3 3 2 4 1 4 4 3 5 Resident in vicinity of PAs 3 3 3 2 2 3 4 4 5 5 4 3 4 4 0 4 4 3 5

Other communities 4 4 0 0 3 3 4 5 5 4 0 0 4 1 2 4 Local administrations 2 2 2 1 3 2 3 4 5 5 4 4 4 4 3 5 4 2 5

Publ

ic a

war

enes

s

Demarcation 1 1 1 0 1 2 2 1 3 3 4 3 3 3 1 3 3 2 4 Total scores 20 20 15 15 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20

Acquired scores 8 8 8 5 8 10 11 13 18 18 15 13 13 15 5 16 15 10 19

Act

ivity

r

esul

ts

Total (in per cent) 40.0 40.0 53.3 33.3 40.0 50.0 55.0 65.0 90.0 90.0 75.0 65.0 65.0 75.0 25.0 80.0 75.0 50.0 95.0

13

Poaching 3 3 5 1 3 2 4 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 1 4 3 2 3 Arrests of illegal actions 4 4 4 0 3 2 4 4 5 5 4 4 5 5 2 4 3 3 4

Pastureland use 2 2 2 2 3 1 4 2 4 5 3 5 3 4 0 4 2 3 3 Zonation & zone regimes 2 3 2 0 2 1 2 2 5 5 5 5 5 5 1 4 3 2 3

Forests & their non-timber forest products

3 2 4 2 2 2 3 3 5 5 4 4 0 0 4 4 2 2 3

Use of bushyplants 3 2 4 2 3 2 3 3 5 5 5 5 4 5 4 5 4 2 2 Use of basins 4 4 3 2 3 3 3 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 1 1 2 3 4 Mining 4 4 4 0 0 0 2 3 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 0 4 Fires, their causes & measures against them

4 3 4 4 0 2 1 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 2 5 3 2 0

Pat

rolli

ng &

mon

itorin

g

Others 3 1 3 0 3 4 0 4 3

Total scores 45 45 45 30 35 40 45 45 45 45 45 45 40 40 40 45 45 45 45

Acquired scores 29 27 32 13 19 15 26 29 44 45 41 43 37 39 20 36 27 19 26 Total (in per cent) 64.4 60.0 71.1 43.3 54.3 37.5 57.8 64.4 97.8 100.0 91.1 95.6 92.5 97.5 50.0 80.0 60.0 42.2 57.8

Community participation in natural resource management

3 3 3 1 3 4 3 3 5 5 3 4 3 3 1 3 2 2 3

Stakeholders’ cooperation 3 3 3 2 4 3 3 3 5 5 5 5 5 5 1 4 3 2 4

External relations 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 5 0 0 5 0 0 3 3 4

Com

mun

ity

parti

cipa

tion

Others 3 3

Total scores 15 15 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 15 15 10 10 15 10 10 10 15 15


Stability of staff members in their employment

4 4 4 1 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 1 5 4 4 4

Training & re-training 2 2 2 1 3 1 2 4 5 5 5 5 2 5 1 4 4 2 5

Educational background of employees

3 3 3 1 4 2 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 1 4 3 2 3

Human resources 3 3 3 1 2 3 4 4 5 3 3 5 3 4 1 4 4 2 5 Issuance of inspector’s power 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 4 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 2 3

Man

agem

ent

Professional skills 3 3 3 1 1 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 3

14

Rangers’ skills & abilities 2 2 2 1 1 2 1 3 4 4 4 4 3 4 1 4 3 3 3

Others 2 Total scores 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35


Tele-communication 1 1 1 1 1 5 1 3 1 1 1 3 4 4 1 5 5 2 5

Transport means 2 2 2 0 4 5 5 4 4 5 5 3 5 5 3 5 5 2 5

Self defence means 3 3 3 0 2 4 3 4 4 4 4 3 4 4 1 4 4 2 1

Ranger’s sets 1 2 1 1 1 4 3 4 3 3 1 2 1 2 4 4 4 3 5

Equipment supplies in working areas

2 2 2 1 1 3 2 1 2 2 3 1 2 1 5 5 5 3 3 Tech

nica

l sup

plie

s

Others 1 Budget sufficiency 2 2 2 0 2 2 2 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 4 4 Supports from projects, programs, & other sources

2 2 2 0 1 2 3 3 5 5 1 1 1 1 1 5 5 0 4

Tourism 2 4 2 0 1 1 1 3 3 2 4 2 2 1 2 2 5 2 0 Incomes from activities 4 4 1 0 4 4 2 4 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 4 2 0

Mat

eria

l res

ourc

es, b

udge

t & fi

nanc

e

Inco

mes

Others 1 0 0 4 Total scores 45 45 45 15 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 40 35

Acquired scores 19 22 16 3 17 30 22 29 27 27 25 21 24 23 23 36 42 20 27 Total (in per cent)

42.2 48.9 35.6 20.0 37.8 66.7 48.9 64.4 60.0 60.0 55.6 46.7 53.3 51.1 51.1 80.0 93.3 50.0 77.1

Forestation 0 5 0 0 1 1 2 3 3 1 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 Biotechnical measures 3 3 3 0 3 3 4 4 5 5 3 3 2 2 1 4 3 1 2

Res

tora

tion

Protection of water upper sources 2 3 2 0 2 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 1 4 4 4 4 2 3

Total scores 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15

Acquired scores 5 11 5 0 6 7 9 11 12 10 11 11 3 6 5 8 7 6 6

Total (in per cent) 33.3 73.3 33.3 0.0 40.0 46.7 60.0 73.3 80.0 66.7 73.3 73.3 20.0 40.0 33.3 53.3 46.7 40.0 40.0

OVERALL SCORES 51.0 54.0 50.6 30.1 48.1 56.2 53.2 65.1 80.7 78.5 71.6 71.2 61.4 66.9 33.7 67.7 67.0 48.1 66.3

15

Appendix 3

Management Plans for PAs in Altai Sayan Eco-Region and overall assessment findings & results (1. Management plan issues & 2. Protected Areas)

Research

53.7% 62.3%

46.3% 37.7%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Research on currentsituation

Research on pressureimpacts

Research on current situation

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Siil

khe

m

Alta

i Ta

van

Bo

gd

Tsa

mb

ag

ara

v

De

be

l

Kh

okh

Se

rkh

Kh

ar

Us

Mya

ng

an

Ug

alz

at

Mu

nkh

kha

irkh

an

Tu

rge

n

Tsa

ga

an

Sh

uvu

ut

Uvs

nu

ur

Kh

an

kho

khii

Kh

yarg

as

nu

ur

Alta

n e

ls

Ula

an

Ta

iga

Kh

ori

do

l sa

rid

ag

Kh

ovs

go

l

Kh

asa

gt

kha

irkh

an

Sh

arg

a M

an

ha

n

Research on current situation

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Siil

khe

m

Alta

i Ta

van

Bo

gd

Tsa

mb

ag

ara

v

De

be

l

Kh

okh

Se

rkh

Kh

ar

Us

Mya

ng

an

Ug

alz

at

Mu

nkh

kha

irkh

an

Tu

rge

n

Tsa

ga

an

Sh

uvu

ut

Uvs

nu

ur

Kh

an

kho

khii

Kh

yarg

as

nu

ur

Alta

n e

ls

Ula

an

Ta

iga

Kh

ori

do

l sa

rid

ag

Kh

ovs

go

l

Kh

asa

gt

kha

irkh

an

Sh

arg

a M

an

ha

n

16

Research on Fauna

41.5%

72.7%61.5%

100.0%

53.3%40.0%

60.0%

45.5% 48.0%36.0% 40.0% 44.7%

58.5%

27.3%38.5%

0.0%

46.7%60.0%

40.0%

54.5% 52.0%64.0% 60.0% 55.3%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Sno

w le

apor

d

Arg

ali s

heep

Ibex

Sai

ga a

ntel

ope

Mar

mot

Red

dee

r

Mus

k de

er

Dee

r

Roe

dee

r

Wild

pig

Fis

h

Bird

s

Research on Mammals

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Siilk

hem

Alta

i Tav

anB

ogd

Tsa

mba

gara

v

Deb

el

Kho

kh S

erkh

Kha

r U

s

Mya

ngan

Uga

lzat

Mun

khkh

airk

han

Tur

gen

Tsa

gaan

Shu

vuut

Uvs

nuu

r

Kha

nkho

khii

Khy

arga

s nu

ur

Alta

n el

s

Ula

an T

aiga

Kho

ridol

sar

idag

Kho

vsgo

l

Kha

sagt

khai

rkha

n

Sha

rga

Man

han

17

Research on pressure impacts

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Siilk

hem

Alta

i Tav

anB

ogd

Tsa

mba

gara

v

Deb

el

Kho

kh S

erkh

Kha

r U

s

Mya

ngan

Uga

lzat

Mun

khkh

airk

han

Tur

gen

Tsa

gaan

Shu

vuut

Uvs

nuu

r

Kha

nkho

khii

Khy

arga

s nu

ur

Alta

n el

s

Ula

an T

aiga

Kho

ridol

sar

idag

Kho

vsgo

l

Kha

sagt

khai

rkha

n

Sha

rga

Man

han

Research on pressure impacts

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Siilk

hem

Alta

i Tav

anB

ogd

Tsa

mba

gara

v

Deb

el

Kho

kh S

erkh

Kha

r U

s

Mya

ngan

Uga

lzat

Mun

khkh

airk

han

Tur

gen

Tsa

gaan

Shu

vuut

Uvs

nuu

r

Kha

nkho

khii

Khy

arga

s nu

ur

Alta

n el

s

Ula

an T

aiga

Kho

ridol

sar

idag

Kho

vsgo

l

Kha

sagt

khai

rkha

n

Sha

rga

Man

han

Public awareness

61.1%72.2% 67.3%

45.5%

38.9%27.8% 32.7%

54.5%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Com

mun

ity

Res

iden

t in

vici

nity

of

PA

s

Loca

lad

min

istr

atio

ns

Dem

arca

tion

18

Public awareness

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Siilk

hem

Alta

i Tav

anB

ogd

Tsa

mba

gara

v

Deb

el

Kho

kh

Ser

kh

Kha

r U

s

Mya

ngan

Uga

lzat

Mun

khkh

airk

han

Tur

gen

Tsa

gaan

Shu

vuu

t

Uv

s nu

ur

Kh

ankh

okhi

i

Khy

arga

s nu

ur

Alta

n e

ls

Ula

an T

aiga

Kho

rido

l sa

ridag

Kho

vsgo

l

Kh

asag

tkh

airk

han

Sha

rga

Ma

nhan

Public awareness

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Siilk

hem

Alta

i Tav

anB

ogd

Tsa

mba

gara

v

Deb

el

Kho

kh

Ser

kh

Kha

r U

s

Mya

ngan

Uga

lzat

Mun

khkh

airk

han

Tur

gen

Tsa

gaan

Shu

vuu

t

Uv

s nu

ur

Kh

ankh

okhi

i

Khy

arga

s nu

ur

Alta

n e

ls

Ula

an T

aiga

Kho

rido

l sa

ridag

Kho

vsgo

l

Kh

asag

tkh

airk

han

Sha

rga

Ma

nhan

Patrolling & monitoring

71.6% 76.7%60.0% 63.3% 63.5%

71.6% 70.5%88.0%

75.3%

28.4% 23.3%40.0% 36.7% 36.5%

28.4% 29.5%12.0%

24.7%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Poa

chin

g

Arr

ests

of i

llega

lac

tions

Pas

ture

land

use

Zon

atio

n &

zon

ere

gim

es

For

ests

& th

eir

non-

timbe

rfo

rest

pro

duct

s

Use

of

bush

ypla

nts

Use

of b

asin

s

Min

ing

Fire

s, th

eir

caus

es &

mea

sure

sag

ains

t the

m

19


0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Siil

khem

Alta

i Tav

anB

ogd

Tsa

mba

gara

v

Deb

el

Kho

kh S

erkh

Kha

r U

s

Mya

ngan

Uga

lzat

Mun

khkh

airk

han

Tur

gen

Tsa

gaan

Shu

vuut

Uvs

nuu

r

Kha

nkho

khii

Khy

arga

s nu

ur

Alta

n el

s

Ula

an T

aiga

Kho

ridol

sar

idag

Kho

vsgo

l

Kha

sagt

khai

rkha

n

Sha

rga

Man

han


0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Siil

khem

Alta

i Tav

anB

ogd

Tsa

mba

gara

v

Deb

el

Kho

kh S

erkh

Kha

r U

s

Mya

ngan

Uga

lzat

Mun

khkh

airk

han

Tur

gen

Tsa

gaan

Shu

vuut

Uvs

nuu

r

Kha

nkho

khii

Khy

arga

s nu

ur

Alta

n el

s

Ula

an T

aiga

Kho

ridol

sar

idag

Kho

vsgo

l

Kha

sagt

khai

rkha

n

Sha

rga

Man

han


0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Siil

khem

Alta

i Tav

anB

ogd

Tsa

mba

gara

v

Deb

el

Kho

kh S

erkh

Kha

r U

s

Mya

ngan

Uga

lzat

Mun

khkh

airk

han

Tur

gen

Tsa

gaan

Shu

vuut

Uvs

nuu

r

Kha

nkho

khii

Khy

arga

s nu

ur

Alta

n el

s

Ula

an T

aiga

Kho

ridol

sar

idag

Kho

vsgo

l

Kha

sagt

khai

rkha

n

Sha

rga

Man

han

Community participation

60.0% 71.6% 80.0%

40.0% 28.4% 20.0%

0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

100%

Community participation in natural resourcemanagement

Stakeholders’ cooperation External relations

20


0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Siil

khem

Alta

i Tav

anB

ogd

Tsa

mba

gara

v

Deb

el

Kho

kh S

erkh

Kha

r U

s

Mya

ngan

Uga

lzat

Mun

khkh

airk

han

Tur

gen

Tsa

gaan

Shu

vuut

Uvs

nuu

r

Kha

nkho

khii

Khy

arga

s nu

ur

Alta

n el

s

Ula

an T

aiga

Kho

ridol

sar

idag

Kho

vsgo

l

Kha

sagt

khai

rkha

n

Sha

rga

Man

han


0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Siil

khem

Alta

i Tav

anB

ogd

Tsa

mba

gara

v

Deb

el

Kho

kh S

erkh

Kha

r U

s

Mya

ngan

Uga

lzat

Mun

khkh

airk

han

Tur

gen

Tsa

gaan

Shu

vuut

Uvs

nuu

r

Kha

nkho

khii

Khy

arga

s nu

ur

Alta

n el

s

Ula

an T

aiga

Kho

ridol

sar

idag

Kho

vsgo

l

Kha

sagt

khai

rkha

n

Sha

rga

Man

han

Management

81.0%63.1% 63.1% 65.2%

29.4%

68.4%53.6%

19.0%36.9% 36.9% 34.8%

70.6%

31.6%46.4%

0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

100%

Sta

bilit

y o

f st

aff

mem

bers

in t

heir

empl

oym

ent

Tra

inin

g &

re-

trai

ning

Edu

catio

nal b

ackg

roun

d of

empl

oyee

s

Hum

an r

esou

rces

Issu

ance

of

insp

ecto

r’spo

wer

Pro

fess

iona

l ski

lls

Ran

gers

’ ski

lls &

abi

litie

s

-

21

Material resources, budget & finance

48.4%

78.9%63.3%

51.6% 48.4% 51.8% 45.9% 45.9%

51.6%

21.1%36.7%

48.4% 51.6% 48.2% 54.1% 54.1%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Tel

e-co

mm

unic

atio

n

Tra

nspo

rtm

eans

Sel

f de

fenc

em

eans

Ran

ger’s

set

s

Equ

ipm

ent

supp

lies

inw

orki

ng a

reas

Sup

port

s fr

ompr

ojec

ts,

prog

ram

s, &

othe

r so

urce

s

Inco

mes

fro

mto

uris

m

Inco

mes

fro

mac

tiviti

es


0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Siilk

hem

Alta

i Tav

anB

ogd

Tsa

mba

gara

v

Deb

el

Kho

kh S

erkh

Kha

r U

s

Mya

ngan

Uga

lzat

Mun

khkh

airk

han

Tur

gen

Tsa

gaan

Shu

vuut

Uvs

nuu

r

Kha

nkho

khii

Khy

arga

s nu

ur

Alta

n el

s

Ula

an T

aiga

Kho

ridol

sar

idag

Kho

vsgo

l

Kha

sagt

khai

rkha

n

Sha

rga

Man

han


0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Siilk

hem

Alta

i Tav

anB

ogd

Tsa

mba

gara

v

Deb

el

Kho

kh S

erkh

Kha

r U

s

Mya

ngan

Uga

lzat

Mun

khkh

airk

han

Tur

gen

Tsa

gaan

Shu

vuut

Uvs

nuu

r

Kha

nkho

khii

Khy

arga

s nu

ur

Alta

n el

s

Ula

an T

aiga

Kho

ridol

sar

idag

Kho

vsgo

l

Kha

sagt

khai

rkha

n

Sha

rga

Man

han

22

Restoration

50.9% 60.0% 63.3%

49.1% 40.0% 36.7%

0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

100%

Forestation Biotechnical measures Protection of waterupper sources

Restoration

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Siil

khem

Alta

i Tav

anB

ogd

Tsa

mba

gara

v

Deb

el

Kho

kh S

erkh

Kha

r U

s

Mya

ngan

Uga

lzat

Mun

khkh

airk

han

Tur

gen

Tsa

gaan

Shu

vuut

Uvs

nuu

r

Kha

nkho

khii

Khy

arga

s nu

ur

Alta

n el

s

Ula

an T

aiga

Kho

ridol

sar

idag

Kho

vsgo

l

Kha

sagt

khai

rkha

n

Sha

rga

Man

han

23

OVERALL SCORES

0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

100%

Siil

khem

Alta

i Tav

anB

ogd

Tsa

mba

gara

v

Deb

el

Kho

kh S

erkh

Kha

r U

s

Mya

ngan

Uga

lzat

Mun

khkh

airk

han

Tur

gen

Tsa

gaan

Shu

vuut

Uvs

nuu

r

Kha

nkho

khii

Khy

arga

s nu

ur

Alta

n el

s

Ula

an T

aiga

Kho

ridol

sar

idag

Kho

vsgo

l

Kha

sagt

khai

rkha

n

Sha

rga

Man

han

implementation of protected area management plans and their … · 2020. 5. 29. · methodology of...

Documents