october 8, 2014 | nepool markets committee

18
OCTOBER 8, 2014 | NEPOOL MARKETS COMMITTEE Jonathan Lowell PRINCIPAL ANALYST | MARKET DEVELOPMENT Improving the ISO’s Ability to Operate Reliably, Produce Efficient Outcomes, and Reduce Avoidable Curtailments of Wind Resources “Do Not Exceed” Real- Time Dispatch

Upload: guy-ingram

Post on 02-Jan-2016

25 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

october 8, 2014 | NEPOOL markets committee. Jonathan Lowell. Principal analyst | market development. Improving the ISO’s Ability to Operate Reliably, Produce Efficient Outcomes, and Reduce Avoidable Curtailments of Wind Resources. “Do Not Exceed” Real-Time Dispatch. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: october  8, 2014 | NEPOOL markets committee

O C T O B E R 8 , 2 0 1 4 | N E P O O L M A R K E T S C O M M I T T E E

Jonathan LowellP R I N C I P A L A N A L Y S T | M A R K E T D E V E L O P M E N T

Improving the ISO’s Ability to Operate Reliably, Produce Efficient Outcomes, and Reduce Avoidable Curtailments of Wind Resources

“Do Not Exceed” Real-Time Dispatch

Page 2: october  8, 2014 | NEPOOL markets committee

Increased Penetration of Intermittent Resources Creates Need for Improved Congestion Management

• The system is facing more frequent localized congestion as more intermittent/renewable resources come online

• Today, this congestion must be handled manually through curtailment instructions

– To ensure reliability, system operators must take a conservative approach. Can’t risk operating “too close to the edge”.

• Manual curtailments do not result in price separation– Wind resources and other Intermittent resources are “non-dispatchable”– Unit Dispatch Software (UDS) is unable to manage congestion by sending dispatch

instructions– Creates local economic incentives to maximize output when reliability requires reduced

output – LMPs are inconsistent with “dispatch” decisions to curtail zero-price resources

• Intermittent Power Resources– Defined in III.13.1.2.2 as resources without control of their net power output– Includes wind, solar and run-of-river hydro

2

Page 3: october  8, 2014 | NEPOOL markets committee

The Solution - “Do Not Exceed” Dispatch• Goals of the DNE Dispatch

1) Ensure reliable operation2) Congestion management through economic dispatch to improve utilization

of transmission facilities, minimize manual curtailments3) Maximize , and avoid unnecessary “spillage”4) Create prices and incentives consistent with efficient market outcomes

(lowest production cost)5) Enhance system operators’ ability to manage the system during rapidly

changing weather conditions

• Dispatchable Intermittent Power Resources (DIPRs) will receive DNE dispatch instructions that reflect:– Current plant output and forecast of plant’s expected unconstrained output

• The forecast will reflect a plant’s current operating status– Economic energy offers submitted by the intermittent resource (i.e.

price/quantity pairs defining an offer curve)– transmission operating limits and system conditions– offers and operating status of non-intermittent resources

3

Page 4: october  8, 2014 | NEPOOL markets committee

DNE Dispatch Overview

• A DNE limit is the maximum amount of economic wind generation that system can accommodate from a DIPR without causing any reliability issues.– The DNE limit will be the lesser of the reliability limit and the

economic output level for the plant, consistent with DIPR’s offer curve and the LMP

• DIPR may operate freely between 0 MW and the DNE limit

• A DIPR must not exceed its DNE limit– This is true whether the DNE limit is determined by reliability limits or

the plant’s economic offer

4

Page 5: october  8, 2014 | NEPOOL markets committee

How is a DNE Limit Determined?• Conceptual overview:

1. ISO produces a high confidence “expected unconstrained output” forecast for each DIPR for the next dispatch interval

2. For each DIPR, set EcoMax to the expected output forecast3. Run Unit Dispatch System (UDS) to produce DDPs for all resources, and LMPs

for all pricing nodes.4. Determine the economic output level (EOL) at which each DIPR would wish

to produce, consistent with its economic offer and the LMP 5. Calculate a reliability-based limit (RBL) for each DIPR, representing the

maximum acceptable output consistent with reliability constraints6. The DNE Limit is the lesser of EOL and RBL

• Some observations– The DDP for a DIPR is not the DNE Limit and is NOT telemetered to the plant– DNE might equal DDP if the plant is constrained due to economic competition

from less expensive resources– The DDP for a DIPR may be less than the expected output when the LMP is

less than the offer price– The DNE limit can exceed the expected output forecast

5

Page 6: october  8, 2014 | NEPOOL markets committee

DNE – A Simple Illustration of One Scenario

6

$/MW

MW

Offer Curve

LMP

Economic Output Level

Reliability Based Limit

Forecast,EcoMax,& DDP

DNE Limit

• The DDP for a DIPR is not the DNE Limit (although they could be equal) and is NOT telemetered to the resource

• DNE might equal DDP if the plant is constrained due to economic competition from less expensive resources

• The DDP for a DIPR may be less than the expected output when the LMP is less than the offer price

• The DNE limit can exceed the expected output forecast

Page 7: october  8, 2014 | NEPOOL markets committee

How Will the Expected Unconstrained Output Forecast Be Developed for Wind Resources?• Every five minutes the ISO will evaluate:

– Current plant output– Wind High Limit - plant operator’s “nowcast” of output if not

constrained by the ISO, and considering current wind conditions and operational status of wind turbines

– Real-Time High Operating Limit – plant operator’s estimate of what the plant can produce with optimal wind conditions and considering the operational status of wind turbines

– ISO’s 50% probability of exceedance (P50) forecast of plant output

• Given the high accuracy of the ISO wind forecast to date, the “expected unconstrained output” forecast will generally be the P50 forecast– The additional information will be used to identify, understand and

correct any errors and biases in the P50 forecast that may emerge

7

Page 8: october  8, 2014 | NEPOOL markets committee

8

Source: September 2014 COO Report

Page 9: october  8, 2014 | NEPOOL markets committee

Price Setting

• LMPs are determined by UDS

• DIPRs are not treated differently than other resources in the price calculation

• In general– When a DIPR is unconstrained (expected output is less than DNE Limit)

it will not be setting price.– When a DIPR is constrained (expected output is greater than DNE

Limit), it would be able to set price.

• Please see the presentation “Real-Time Dispatch of Intermittent Resources” by T. Zheng & J. Zhao at the September 29, 2014 VRWG meeting.– Comprehensive discussion and examples of DNE Limit determination

and pricing impacts

9

Page 10: october  8, 2014 | NEPOOL markets committee

DNE Dispatch Eligibility• The DNE Dispatch is designed to accommodate all intermittent resource

types, when the following necessary conditions are met:– Telecommunications, metering, and other requirements, as specified in OP-14– Physical controls/equipment that enable a resource to follow dispatch instructions to

reduce output to a specified level– ISO is able to produce an accurate plant-specific short term forecast of output for the

next dispatch interval

• Initially, this will include only wind assets that are not Settlement Only Generators (SOG)

– OP-14 Appendix F already includes wind-specific specific requirements– OP-14 also governs eligibility for registration as an SOG

• All non-SOG intermittent assets that meet the above necessary conditions will be required to receive and follow DNE Limit dispatch instructions

10

Aggregated Max Net Output at Common Point of

ConnectionInterconnection Voltage Generator SOG

Not registered (if not a Load Reducer)

greater than or at 115 kV yes no noless than 115 kV no yes yes

greater than or at 115 kV yes no noless than 115 kV yes yes yes

greater than or at 115 kV yes no noless than 115 kV yes no no

Size < 1 MW

1 MW <= Size < 5 MW

Size >= 5 MW

Registration Options

Page 11: october  8, 2014 | NEPOOL markets committee

DNE Dispatch Eligibility – Forecast Considerations

• An accurate short term forecast for wind resources is already in place– Phase II of the wind forecast project will automate publication of a

fleet-wide wind forecast prior to DNE Dispatch implementation

• The ISO has not evaluated the required effort or feasibility of developing short term forecasts for solar or intermittent hydro– Due to size and location, solar resources are not anticipated to be a cause of

frequent curtailments in the next several years– The ISO is participating in a collaborative R&D effort to identify best practices

for solar forecasting– The Distributed Generation Forecast Working Group is inventorying existing

solar resources and developing a long term forecast of solar penetration

• No timeframe has been established to extend DNE Dispatch to non-wind intermittent resources.

11

Page 12: october  8, 2014 | NEPOOL markets committee

DNE Dispatch – Operational Considerations• Transmission lines in remote locations where many wind plants have

located tend to be “skinny”, with line limits that cannot be exceeded, even for short periods– Normal rating = Short Term Emergency Rating = Long Term Emergency Rating

• The ISO will not be reserving space on transmission lines to allow wind resources to temporarily exceed a DNE Limit to take advantage of increasing wind – The short term forecast will recognize the increasing expected wind output,

and UDS would begin ramping down higher priced resources– Once telemetry confirms space has been created by the down-ramping

resources, wind resources would receive new, higher DNE Limits, and could begin ramping up.

• Wind resources generally have much faster ramp rates than other dispatchable resources. A wind plant could “fill up” the space to be created by a down-ramp before the down-ramp was completed.

– Reserving space effectively locks in inefficient use of transmission facilities whenever a line is constrained and a wind plant on the line is operating below its Real-Time High Operating Limit (RTHOL)

12

Page 13: october  8, 2014 | NEPOOL markets committee

Day-Ahead and Real-Time Markets

• DIPRs with Capacity Supply Obligations will be required to submit offers into the Day-Ahead Market (DAM) up to the actual RT production expected by the Lead Participant– This is consistent with “physical capability” offer requirements placed

on other dispatchable capacity resources, including Demand Response– This requirement would take effect at the start of the Capacity

Commitment Period beginning June 1, 2018 (associated with FCA #9)

• How does the ISO use the wind forecast in DA and RT?– The wind forecast is not included in the DAM– Current practice is to include 100% of the wind forecast MW in all

Resource Adequacy Assessments (RAA) of capacity requirements– In real-time, 25% of forecast MW is normally assumed when making

supplemental commitments for specific reliability needs

13

Page 14: october  8, 2014 | NEPOOL markets committee

DNE Dispatch – NCPC Impacts• NCPC cost allocation will be addressed in a separate comprehensive

design effort later this year– This effort will consider the role of generator energy deviations (including

DIPRs), along with all other aspects of cost allocation

• The recent NCPC Credit redesign (effective 12/3/2014) makes intermittent resources eligible for all NCPC credits except:– Hourly Shortfall credit (cleared in DA but constrained off in RT)– RT Dispatch Out of Merit credit (Not explicitly excluded, but the calculation for non-

dispatchable resources would never produce a credit)

• DIPRs will be eligible for both of these credits– Since DIPRs will be able to set price, the Hourly Shortfall exclusion is no longer

necessary– Out of Merit credits are considered unlikely, but could occur during Min Gen

Emergencies

• “Following dispatch”, as applied to DIPRs, will mean operation at any output level between 0 MW and the DNE Limit.

14

Page 15: october  8, 2014 | NEPOOL markets committee

Providing Reserves

• DIPRs may qualify as Fast Start resources if able to meet all Fast Start eligibility conditions– wind plants should generally qualify

• Intermittent resources today are not eligible to:– provide real-time reserves– meet Forward Reserve Obligations– provide regulation

• DIPRs will continue to be ineligible to provide these services

15

Page 16: october  8, 2014 | NEPOOL markets committee

Local Min Gen Emergencies

• The current tariff at III.2.5(c) provides for the possibility of local Min Gen Emergencies

• DNE Dispatch eliminates the need to declare a local MGE– Local MGE is just manual congestion management– DNE Dispatch will do this accomplish this economically– Procedures to declare and settle a local MGE have never been

implemented, so the tariff language serves no purpose

• The portion of III.2.5(c) relating to local MGE will be eliminated.

16

Page 17: october  8, 2014 | NEPOOL markets committee

DNE Dispatch – Operating Procedure Conforming Changes• Some of the terminology used in OP-14 may need conforming

changes to be consistent with new terminology and meanings associated with DNE Dispatch– For example, “dispatch” generally implies an ability to follow

instructions to move both up and down. DNE Dispatch only implies an ability to move down to prevent operation above the DNE limit.

• OP-18 may need technical updates to the datapoints being telemetered, etc.

• Any necessary changes will be brought through the normal Reliability Committee stakeholder process– No schedule has yet been determined. – 2015 Q3 or Q4 is a reasonable guess, depending on the RC’s

anticipated workload

17

Page 18: october  8, 2014 | NEPOOL markets committee

Anticipated Schedule

• October MC meeting – conceptual overview– MR1 language available, but not discussed

• November MC meeting – MR1 language presented

• December MC meeting – request MC vote

• January PC meeting (or later) - request PC approval

• FERC filing in January 2015

• RC review of any changes to Operating Procedures sometime in 2015

• Implementation no earlier than late-2015

18