project title: blackcurrants: refinement of the · competition or herbicide growth check delays...
TRANSCRIPT
Agriculture and Horticulture Development Board 2017. All rights reserved
Project title: Blackcurrants: Refinement of the
screening of herbicides for safe use in
recently planted cuttings.
Project number: SF 154a
Project leader: Mike Hutchinson
Report: Final report – November 2016
Previous report: SF154 – November 2014
Key staff: John Keer (RAA Ltd.)
Michael Rodger (RAA Ltd.)
Location of project: Kington. Herefordshire. UK
Industry Representative: Rob Saunders
Date project commenced: 1st March 2016
Date project completed
(or expected completion date):
November 2016
Agriculture and Horticulture Development Board 2017. All rights reserved
DISCLAIMER
AHDB, operating through its HDC division seeks to ensure that the information contained
within this document is accurate at the time of printing. No warranty is given in respect
thereof and, to the maximum extent permitted by law the Agriculture and Horticulture
Development Board accepts no liability for loss, damage or injury howsoever caused
(including that caused by negligence) or suffered directly or indirectly in relation to
information and opinions contained in or omitted from this document.
Copyright, Agriculture and Horticulture Development Board 2017. All rights reserved.
No part of this publication may be reproduced in any material form (including by photocopy
or storage in any medium by electronic means) or any copy or adaptation stored, published
or distributed (by physical, electronic or other means) without the prior permission in writing
of the Agriculture and Horticulture Development Board, other than by reproduction in an
unmodified form for the sole purpose of use as an information resource when the
Agriculture and Horticulture Development Board or HDC is clearly acknowledged as the
source, or in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act
1988. All rights reserved.
AHDB (logo) is a registered trademark of the Agriculture and Horticulture Development
Board.
HDC is a registered trademark of the Agriculture and Horticulture Development Board, for
use by its HDC division.
All other trademarks, logos and brand names contained in this publication are the
trademarks of their respective holders. No rights are granted without the prior written
permission of the relevant owners.
[The results and conclusions in this report are based on an investigation conducted over a
one-year period. The conditions under which the experiments were carried out and the
results have been reported in detail and with accuracy. However, because of the biological
nature of the work it must be borne in mind that different circumstances and conditions
could produce different results. Therefore, care must be taken with interpretation of the
results, especially if they are used as the basis for commercial product recommendations.]
Agriculture and Horticulture Development Board 2017. All rights reserved
AUTHENTICATION
We declare that this work was done under our supervision according to the procedures
described herein and that the report represents a true and accurate record of the results
obtained.
Dr. John Keer
Development Agronomist
Richard Austin Agriculture Limited
Signature ... .............................................. Date14th November 2016
[Name]
[Position]
[Organisation]
Signature ............................................................ Date ............................................
Report authorised by:
[Name]
[Position]
[Organisation]
Signature ............................................................ Date ............................................
[Name]
[Position]
[Organisation]
Signature ............................................................ Date ............................................
Agriculture and Horticulture Development Board 2017. All rights reserved
CONTENTS
Grower Summary ...................................................................................................... 5
Headline.................................................................. Error! Bookmark not defined.
Background and expected deliverables .................. Error! Bookmark not defined.
Summary of the project and main conclusions ....... Error! Bookmark not defined.
Financial benefits ..................................................................................................... 6
Action points for growers ........................................................................................ 6
Science Section ....................................................................................................... 7
Introduction ............................................................................................................. 7
Materials and methods ........................................................................................... 7
Results .................................................................................................................. 11
Discussion .............................................................................................................. 3
Conclusions ............................................................................................................ 3
Knowledge and Technology Transfer ..................................................................... 4
Glossary.................................................................................................................. 4
References ............................................................................................................. 4
Appendices ............................................................................................................. 5
Agriculture and Horticulture Development Board 2017. All rights reserved
GROWER SUMMARY
Headline • Refinement of an earlier herbicide screen has shown a range of herbicides to be
suitable as potential replacements for Ronstar, to control annual weeds in newly
planted blackcurrant cuttings.
Background and expected deliverables The residual herbicide Ronstar (oxadiazon) has long been relied upon for weed
control in newly planted blackcurrant cuttings, but the approval has not been
maintained and it has already become difficult to obtain from distributors.
A previous herbicide screening trial showed products to offer variable levels of weed
control and crop safety. Some of the most efficacious herbicides also showed the
greatest levels of crop damage. This trial was designed to refine rates of the most
promising treatments and design tank-mixes with broad spectrum weed control
activity.
Summary of the project and main conclusions
A range of herbicides were applied to newly planted cuttings of blackcurrant (Ben
Vane). The crop safety and weed control efficacy provided by these herbicides was
assessed during the early growing season. Herbicide treatments were selected from
promising candidate herbicides, evaluated in the earlier herbicide weed screen (SF
154).
The weed species occurring in this trial were Poa annua (Annual meadow-grass),
Matricaria spp. (Mayweeds), Galium aparine (Cleavers) and Cirsium spp. (Thistles).
However, weed numbers were too low to provide the most robust herbicide efficacy
data.
Despite this and some waterlogging in areas of the trial, some promising data were
obtained on the safe use of herbicides in newly planted blackcurrants.
A band spray between plant rows of Nirvana (4.5l) in combination with Flexidor (2.0l)
sprayed over the plants, provided a safer option compared to when Nirvana (4.5l)
was applied as an overall spray (which was found to be too phytotoxic in blackcurrant
in previous experiments). The combination also gave good levels of weed control.
Artist (2.5kg) + Kerb (4.25l) and Devrinol (7.0l) + Kerb (4.25l) also provided good
control of most of the weed species present with a good level of crop safety.
Agriculture and Horticulture Development Board 2017. All rights reserved
A range of other Nirvana containing tank-mixes showed only marginal crop safety
and variable weed control levels.
Financial benefits Blackcurrant plantations are estimated to be replaced at around 200 ha/pa. Financial
benefits potentially arise from reduced requirement for hand weeding, which may
cost £1,100/ha, and which may be reduced to virtually nothing through good
herbicidal weed control. Also improved establishment – a mature plantation will
produce around 7.5 tonnes/ha, valued at around £5,000, a figure which can quickly
be reduced by 10% due to poor establishment or weed competition. Often, weed
competition or herbicide growth check delays attaining full cropping yield by 1 year.
Action points for growers • This study provides further information and pointers for agronomists and growers
to adopt herbicide strategies which are suitable for their site, which, if
implemented, will make establishment of new plantations more reliable.
Agriculture and Horticulture Development Board 2017. All rights reserved
SCIENCE SECTION
Introduction
A range of herbicides were applied to newly planted cuttings of blackcurrant
(Ben Vane). The crop safety and weed control efficacy provided by these herbicides
was assessed during the early growing season.
Materials and methods
EXPERIMENTAL DETAILS
Trial number: RAA 01-2016
Co-operator: James Wright
Whittern farms Limited
Next End, Lyonshall
Kington
Herefordshire HR5 3HZ
Site: Lyonshall
Kington. Herefordshire
Grid reference: SO352580
Soil type: Silt loam
Crop & Cultivar: Blackcurrant cuttings: variety Ben Vane
Planting Date: 03.03.2016
Field Preparation: Winter plough/press
Secondary cultivation
Hand plant
Previous treatments: Nil
Plot size: 3m X 8m
Design: Randomised complete block
X3 replication
Agriculture and Horticulture Development Board 2017. All rights reserved
Table 1. Treatment List.
Treatment Rate / ha Timing
1 Untreated control
2 *Flexidor/ Nirvana 2.0l / 4.5l T1
3 Nirvana 1.125l T1
4 Nirvana + Artist + Kerb 1.125l + 1.25kg + 4.25l T1
5 Nirvana + Artist + Kerb 1.125l + 2.5kg + 4.25l T1
6 Nirvana + Artist + Kerb 2.25l + 1.25kg + 4.25l T1
7 Artist + Kerb 2.5kg + 4.25l T1
8 Devrinol + Kerb 7.0l + 4.25l T1
*Flexidor applied as a 20cm wide band, centred on crop row and Nirvana applied to
remaining untreated soil.
T1 = Soon after planting – prior to weed emergence.
Table 2. Product List.
Product Name
Active ingredient
g/a.i.
Formulation
Artist flufenacet +
metribuzin
24% + 17.5% w/w WG
Devrinol napropamide 450g/l EC
Flexidor isoxaben 500g/l SC
Kerb propyzamide 400g/l EC
Nirvana pendimethalin +
imazamox
250g/l+16.7g/l SC
Agriculture and Horticulture Development Board 2017. All rights reserved
APPLICATION DETAILS
Applicator: GS plot sprayer - air pressurised (Pulvexpur - 3m)
Nozzles: 015 F110 Lo Drift
Pressure: 3.2 bar
Speed: 1.0 m/s
Water Volume: 200 l/ha
T1 – “early post-planting”
Date: 14.03.2016 – 11 days after planting
Crop Stage: dormant cuttings
Leaf Moisture: dry
Soil Moisture (Surface): moist
Soil Moisture (Sub-surface):moist
Soil Condition: loose
Soil Tilth: small clods
Weather at application: Sunny
Air temperature (Deg. C): 12
Soil temperature (Deg. C): 7
Wind (kph): 2 – northeast
Cloud cover (%): 20
Comment: Good spraying conditions. Adverse weather conditions
delayed T1 application by one week.
Agriculture and Horticulture Development Board 2017. All rights reserved
ASSESSMENT METHODS
The following assessments were carried out on the trial:
At application
Soil and climatic data were collected at application:
• T1 14.03.2016 dormant cutting
Crop Phytotoxicity
Crop damage symptoms including vigour reduction (assessed as % vigour reduction
compared to untreated control), chlorosis, necrosis and growth distortion were
assessed as follows:
• 23DAT 06.04.2016 bud break • 30DAT 13.04.2016 first fully unfolded leaf • 57DAT 10.05.2016 plants 15cm height • 123DAT 15.07.2016 plants 20cm height • 158DAT 19.08.2016 plants 45cm height (DAT – Days after treatment)
Weed control
Weed control was assessed as % weed biomass reduction compared with the
untreated control. Biomass reduction was recorded for each major weed species
present:
• 23DAT 06.04.2016 bud break • 30DAT 13.04.2016 first fully unfolded leaf • 57DAT 10.05.2016 plants 15cm height • 123DAT 15.07.2016 plants 20cm height • 158DAT 19.08.2016 plants 45cm height
Weed levels in the untreated control were recorded as % ground cover and number
of each weed species per square metre (mean of 4 X 0.33 sq. m quadrats per
untreated plot).
Agriculture and Horticulture Development Board 2017. All rights reserved
Results
Crop Phytotoxicity – chlorosis, leaf malformation and vigour reduction. Table 3 – Crop phytotoxicity (% chlorosis) – 23DAT, 30DAT and 57DAT. Crop Code RIBNI RIBNI RIBNI
Crop Scientific Name Ribes nigrum Ribes nigrum Ribes nigrum Crop Name Blackcurrant Blackcurrant Blackcurrant
Crop Variety Ben Vane Ben Vane Ben Vane Rating Date Apr-6-2016 Apr-13-2016 May-10-2016 Rating Type PHYCHL PHYCHL PHYCHL Rating Unit % % %
Trt-Eval Interval 23 DA-A 30 DA-A 57 DA-A ARM Action Codes AA AL
Trt Treatment No. Name 1 Untreated 0.0 b 0.0 b 0.0 c
2 Flexidor/Nirvana 2.0l + 4.5l 5.0 a 9.3 a 4.0 a
3 Nirvana 1.125l 3.2 a 5.0 a 2.0 abc 4 Nirvana + Artist + Kerb 4.4 a 8.1 a 2.0 abc
1.125l + 1.25kg + 4.25l 5 Nirvana + Artist + Kerb 4.3 a 9.2 a 4.0 a
1.125l + 2.5kg + 4.25l
6 Nirvana + Artist + Kerb 4.7 a 10.5 a 3.3 ab
2.25l +1.25kg + 4.25l
7 Artist + Kerb 2.5kg + 4.25l 3.6 a 6.3 a 2.0 abc
8 Devrinol + Kerb 7.0l 4.25l 2.6 a 5.0 a 1.3 bc
LSD P=.05 4.29t 0.31t 2.04 Standard Deviation 2.45t 0.18t 1.16 CV 24.45t 21.91t 49.93 Replicate F 0.340 0.370 0.123 Replicate Prob(F) 0.7177 0.6973 0.8854 Treatment F 8.896 11.312 4.211 Treatment Prob(F) 0.0003 0.0001 0.0107
Crop Code RIBNI, BCUR, Ribes nigrum, = US Rating Type PHYCHL = phytotoxicity - chlorosis Rating Unit % = percent ARM Action Codes AA = Automatic arcsine square root % transformation AL = Automatic log transformation of X+1 Means followed by same letter do not significantly differ (P=.05, Duncan's New MRT) t=Mean descriptions are reported in transformed data units, and are not de-transformed.
Agriculture and Horticulture Development Board 2017. All rights reserved
Table 4 – Crop phytotoxicity (% leaf malformation) – 23DAT, 30DAT and 57DAT.
Crop Code RIBNI RIBNI RIBNI Crop Scientific Name Ribes nigrum Ribes nigrum Ribes nigrum
Crop Name Blackcurrant Blackcurrant Blackcurrant Crop Variety Ben Vane Ben Vane Ben Vane Rating Date Apr-6-2016 Apr-13-2016 May-10-2016 Rating Type PHYLMA PHYLMA PHYLMA Rating Unit % % %
Trt-Eval Interval 23 DA-A 30 DA-A 57 DA-A ARM Action Codes AL AA
Trt Treatment No. Name
1 Untreated 0.0 d 0.0 e 0.0 a
2 Flexidor/Nirvana 2.0l + 4.5l 5.9 c 12.3 cd 0.0 a
3 Nirvana 1.125l 6.3 c 10.9 cd 0.0 a
4 Nirvana + Artist + Kerb 6.3 c 10.0 d 0.0 a
1.125l + 1.25kg + 4.25l
5 Nirvana + Artist + Kerb 11.5 b 20.0 bc 0.0 a
1.125l + 2.5kg + 4.25l
6 Nirvana + Artist + Kerb 13.1 b 24.9 b 0.0 a
2.25l +1.25kg + 4.25l
7 Artist + Kerb 2.5kg + 4.25l 22.9 a 45.0 a 0.0 a
8 Devrinol + Kerb 7.0l 4.25l 5.0 c 10.9 cd 0.0 a
LSD P=.05 0.18t 7.11t 0.00 Standard Deviation 0.10t 4.06t 0.00 CV 11.85t 18.45t 0.0 Replicate F 0.853 0.175 0.000 Replicate Prob(F) 0.4472 0.8413 1.0000 Treatment F 46.403 26.031 0.000 Treatment Prob(F) 0.0001 0.0001 1.0000
Pest Type W, Weed, G-BYRW7, G-WedStg = Weed or volunteer crop Crop Code RIBNI, BCUR, Ribes nigrum, = US Rating Type PHYLMA = phytotoxicity - leaf malformation Rating Unit % = percent ARM Action Codes AL = Automatic log transformation of X+1 AA = Automatic arcsine square root % transformation Means followed by same letter do not significantly differ (P=.05, Duncan's New MRT)
t=Mean descriptions are reported in transformed data units, and are not de-transformed.
Agriculture and Horticulture Development Board 2017. All rights reserved
Table 5 – Crop phytotoxicity (% vigour reduction versus untreated) – 23DAT, 30DAT and 57DAT.
Crop Code RIBNI RIBNI RIBNI Crop Scientific Name Ribes nigrum Ribes nigrum Ribes nigrum
Crop Name Blackcurrant Blackcurrant Blackcurrant Crop Variety Ben Vane Ben Vane Ben Vane Rating Date Apr-6-2016 Apr-13-2016 May-10-2016 Rating Type VIGRED VIGRED VIGRED Rating Unit % % %
Trt-Eval Interval 23 DA-A 30 DA-A 57 DA-A ARM Action Codes AA Trt Treatment No. Name 1 Untreated 0.0 a 0.0 a 0.0 c
2 Flexidor/Nirvana 2.0l + 4.5l 0.0 a 0.0 a 6.0 ab
3 Nirvana 1.125l 0.0 a 0.0 a 3.3 b
4 Nirvana + Artist + Kerb 0.0 a 0.0 a 5.0 ab
1.125l + 1.25kg + 4.25l
5 Nirvana + Artist + Kerb 0.0 a 0.0 a 5.0 ab
1.125l + 2.5kg + 4.25l
6 Nirvana + Artist + Kerb 0.0 a 0.0 a 7.7 a
2.25l +1.25kg + 4.25l
7 Artist + Kerb 2.5kg + 4.25l 0.0 a 0.0 a 0.0 c
8 Devrinol + Kerb 7.0l 4.25l 0.0 a 0.0 a 0.0 c
LSD P=.05 0.00t 0.00 2.65 Standard Deviation 0.00t 0.00 1.51
CV 0.0t 0.0 44.85 Replicate F 0.000 0.000 0.709
Replicate Prob(F) 1.0000 1.0000 0.5089 Treatment F 0.000 0.000 12.112
Treatment Prob(F) 1.0000 1.0000 0.0001
Crop Code RIBNI, BCUR, Ribes nigrum, = US Rating Type VIGRED = vigor reduction Rating Unit % = percent ARM Action Codes AA = Automatic arcsine square root % transformation Means followed by same letter do not significantly differ (P=.05, Duncan's New MRT) t=Mean descriptions are reported in transformed data units, and are not de-transformed.
Agriculture and Horticulture Development Board 2017. All rights reserved
Weed levels in the untreated control. No weeds had emerged at the time of herbicide application – 14.03.2016 Table 6. Weed levels in untreated controls at - 10.05. 2016 (57DAT). Weed species Weeds / sq. m Weed size Matricaria spp. (Mayweeds) 7 6-8 true leaves Galium aparine (Cleavers) 3 6cm across Poa annua (Annual meadow-grass)
4 2-3 tillers
Cirsium spp.(Thistle) 4 5cm across Weed levels were generally low across the trial area. Higher levels of weed infestation are required to make more confident comparisons of herbicide efficacy. Weeds were slow to develop and only present in sufficient numbers to allow a first assessment on 10.05.2016.
Agriculture and Horticulture Development Board 2017. All rights reserved
Weed control Table 7. Assessment of weed control as % weed biomass reduction versus untreated control – 10.05.2016 (57DAT).
Pest Code MATSS POAAN CIRSS GALAP Pest Scientific Name Matricaria
sp. Poa annua Cirsium sp. Galium aparine
Pest Name Mayweeds Annual Meadow-grass Thistle Cleavers
Crop Code RIBNI RIBNI RIBNI RIBNI Crop Scientific Name Ribes
nigrum Ribes nigrum Ribes nigrum Ribes nigrum
Crop Name Blackcurrant Blackcurrant Blackcurr
ant Blackcurrant Crop Variety Ben Vane Ben Vane Ben Vane Ben Vane Rating Date May-10-
2016 May-10-2016 May-10-2016 May-10-2016
Rating Type BIOMRE BIOMRE BIOMRE BIOMRE Rating Unit % % % %
Trt-Eval Interval 57 DA-A 57 DA-A 57 DA-A 57 DA-A ARM Action Codes Trt Treatment No. Name 1 Untreated 0.0 e 0.0 d 0.0 b 0.0 b
2 Flexidor/Nirvana 2.0l + 4.5l 96.7 a 98.3 a 96.7 a 100.0 a
3 Nirvana 1.125l 76.7 d 76.7 c 85.0 a 90.0 a
4 Nirvana + Artist + Kerb 78.3 cd 85.0 bc 85.0 a 95.0 a
1.125l + 1.25kg + 4.25l
5 Nirvana + Artist + Kerb 95.0 ab 100.0 a 95.0 a 100.0 a
1.125l + 2.5kg + 4.25l
6 Nirvana + Artist + Kerb 93.3 ab 100.0 a 96.7 a 100.0 a
2.25l +1.25kg + 4.25l
7 Artist + Kerb 2.5kg + 4.25l 86.7 bc 90.0 ab 96.7 a 100.0 a
8 Devrinol + Kerb 7.0l 4.25l 100.0 a 98.3 a 98.3 a 100.0 a
LSD P=.05 8.52 10.04 12.84 12.33 Standard Deviation 4.86 5.73 7.33 7.04 CV 6.21 7.08 8.97 8.22 Replicate F 2.157 2.882 2.928 0.568 Replicate Prob(F) 0.1525 0.0895 0.0866 0.5794 Treatment F 136.151 104.249 62.404 73.270 Treatment Prob(F) 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001
Rating Type BIOMRE = biomas reduction Rating Unit % = percent Means followed by same letter do not significantly differ (P=.05, Duncan's New MRT)
Agriculture and Horticulture Development Board 2017. All rights reserved 1
Table 8. Assessment of weed control as % weed biomass reduction versus untreated control – 15.07.2016 (123DAT).
Pest Code Pest Scientific Name
Pest Name Crop Code
BBCH Scale Crop Scientific Name
Crop Name Crop Variety Rating Date Rating Type Rating Unit
Trt-Eval Interval ARM Action Codes
MATCH Matricaria
chamomilla Scented
Mayweed RIBNI BCUR
Ribes nigrum Blackcurrant
Ben Vane Jul-15-2016
BIOMRE %
123 DA-A
POAAN Poa annua
Annual Meadow-
grass RIBNI BCUR
Ribes nigrum Blackcurrant
Ben Vane Jul-15-2016
BIOMRE %
123 DA-A AA
CIRSS Cirsium sp.
Thistle RIBNI BCUR
Ribes nigrum Blackcurrant
Ben Vane Jul-15-2016
BIOMRE %
123 DA-A
GALAP Galium aparine
Cleavers RIBNI BCUR
Ribes nigrum Blackcurrant
Ben Vane Jul-15-2016
BIOMRE %
123 DA-A ER1
Trt Treatment No. Name 1 Untreated 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2 Flexidor/Nirvana 2.0l + 4.5l 80.0 20.0 80.0 90.0
3 Nirvana 1.125l 20.0 10.0 80.0 80.0 4 Nirvana + Artist + Kerb 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0
1.125l + 1.25kg + 4.25l 5 Nirvana + Artist + Kerb 60.0 70.0 70.0 100.0
1.125l + 2.5kg + 4.25l 6 Nirvana + Artist + Kerb 25.0 30.0 45.0 100.0
2.25l +1.25kg + 4.25l
7 Artist + Kerb 2.5kg + 4.25l 15.0 60.0 65.0 100.0
8 Devrinol + Kerb 7.0l 4.25l 80.0 85.0 5.0 100.0
LSD P=.05 . . . . Standard Deviation . . . . CV . . . . Replicate F Replicate Prob(F) Treatment F Treatment Prob(F) Rating Type BIOMRE = biomas reduction Rating Unit % = percent ARM Action Codes AA = Automatic arcsine square root % transformation ER1 = Excluded replicate 1
Data in Table 8 have not been statistically analysed, because only data from the first replicate have been included.
Agriculture and Horticulture Development Board 2017. All rights reserved 2
Table 9. Assessment of weed control as % weed biomass reduction versus untreated control – 19.08.2016 (158DAT).
Pest Code Pest Scientific Name
Pest Name Crop Code
BBCH Scale Crop Scientific Name
Crop Name Crop Variety Rating Date Rating Type Rating Unit
Trt-Eval Interval ARM Action Codes
MATCH Matricaria
chamomilla Scented
Mayweed RIBNI BCUR
Ribes nigrum Blackcurrant
Ben Vane Aug-19-2016
BIOMRE %
158 DA-A
POAAN Poa annua
Annual Meadow-grass
RIBNI BCUR
Ribes nigrum Blackcurrant
Ben Vane Aug-19-2016
BIOMRE %
158 DA-A
CIRSS Cirsium sp.
Thistle RIBNI BCUR
Ribes nigrum Blackcurrant
Ben Vane Aug-19-2016
BIOMRE %
158 DA-A
GALAP Galium aparine
Cleavers RIBNI BCUR
Ribes nigrum Blackcurrant
Ben Vane Aug-19-2016
BIOMRE %
158 DA-A ER1
Trt Treatment No. Name
1 Untreated 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
2 Flexidor/Nirvana 2.0l + 4.5l 75.0 20.0 80.0 90.0
3 Nirvana 1.125l 20.0 10.0 80.0 80.0 4 Nirvana + Artist + Kerb 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0
1.125l + 1.25kg + 4.25l 5 Nirvana + Artist + Kerb 60.0 70.0 70.0 100.0
1.125l + 2.5kg + 4.25l 6 Nirvana + Artist + Kerb 25.0 30.0 45.0 100.0
2.25l +1.25kg + 4.25l
7 Artist + Kerb 2.5kg + 4.25l 15.0 60.0 65.0 100.0
8 Devrinol + Kerb 7.0l 4.25l 80.0 85.0 5.0 100.0
LSD P=.05 . . . . Standard Deviation . . . . CV . . . . Replicate F Replicate Prob(F) Treatment F Treatment Prob(F)
Rating Type BIOMRE = biomas reduction Rating Unit % = percent ARM Action Codes ER1 = Excluded replicate 1 Data in Table 9 have not been statistically analysed, because only data from the first replicate have been included.
Agriculture and Horticulture Development Board 2017. All rights reserved 3
Discussion The trial site was subject to severe waterlogging, especially during the latter part of May and into June. Therefore, assessments made after the middle of May, of both weed control and crop safety were compromised. Crop effects due to waterlogging were difficult to distinguish from possible damage from herbicide treatments. Similarly, waterlogging affected weed growth and therefore masked herbicide activity. In order to mitigate the problem of waterlogging, all assessments made after 10.05.2016 were confined to the first replicated block, which largely escaped water damage. However, this lack of replication prohibits statistical analysis, resulting in far less robust data from the later assessments. No crop vigour reduction was observed for any herbicide treatment, at the “bud break” and “first leaf fully unfolded” growth stages. Significant (P=0.05) levels of vigour reduction were observed 57DAT for some herbicides, although such levels should be regarded as commercially acceptable. Although crop vigour was largely unaffected by herbicides, levels of chlorosis and leaf malformation (leaf curling) were recorded. Leaf malformation was completely outgrown by the 57DAT assessment but chlorosis was observed throughout the season, albeit at commercially acceptable levels by 57DAT. Nirvana containing treatments showed the highest levels of crop effect but the lower rates employed here, compared to those used in the initial herbicide screen – SF 154, appear acceptably safe. Band spraying previously unsafe rates of Nirvana (4.5l) away from the cuttings, in combination with Flexidor applied over the rows, was a marginally safe treatment, though logically it should be avoided on sites where a waterlogging risk exists, due to the potential of imazamox to move in water. Artist (2.5kg) + Kerb (4.25l) and Devrinol (7.0l) + Kerb (4.25l) showed good levels of crop safety, though previous grower experience with the use of Devriol on one site prompts caution. Weed numbers per species were too low to make conclusive comparisons between the efficacies of herbicides. However, Flexidor/Nirvana band sprays gave good control of the broadleaf weed species present. All herbicides provided good levels of weed control, although some treatments were very species specific.
Conclusions The trial has shown the potential of banded sprays and tank mix options for the control of a range of weeds in newly planted blackcurrant cuttings. However, this work should be repeated for different soil types and seasons to build greater confidence in crop safety and efficacy.
Agriculture and Horticulture Development Board 2017. All rights reserved 4
Knowledge and Technology Transfer N/A
Glossary N/A
References HDC Report SF 154. (2014) Blackcurrants: Screening herbicides for safe use in recently
planted cuttings.
Agriculture and Horticulture Development Board 2017. All rights reserved 5
Appendices
Plates:
PLATE 1. UNTREATED CONTROL – 19.08.2016
PLATE 2. FLEXIDOR 2.0L / NIRVANA 4.5L BAND TREATMENT – 19.08.2016
Agriculture and Horticulture Development Board 2017. All rights reserved 6
PLATE 3. NIRVANA 1.125L – 19.08.2016
PLATE 4. NIRVANA 1.125L + ARTIST 1.25KG + KERB 4.25L – 19.08.2016
Agriculture and Horticulture Development Board 2017. All rights reserved 7
PLATE 5. NIRVANA 1.125L + ARTIST 2.5KG + KERB 4.25L – 19.08.2016
PLATE 6. NIRVANA 2.25L + ARTIST 1.25KG + KERB 4.25L – 19.08.2016
Agriculture and Horticulture Development Board 2017. All rights reserved 8
PLATE 7. ARTIST 2.5KG + KERB 4.25L – 19.08.2016
PLATE 8. DEVRINOL 7.0L + KERB 4.25L – 19.08.2016
Agriculture and Horticulture Development Board 2017. All rights reserved 9
PLATE 9. UNTREATED CONTROL IN BLOCK 2 SHOWING WATERLOGGING – 19.08.2016