prototype testing summary 2
DESCRIPTION
This presentation gives the detailed on field testing that we carried out to test our 3 prototypes. Paper mockup being the basic one and web mockup, the advanced one.TRANSCRIPT
Prototype Transition from previous phase
Survey
Paper Mock-up
Digital Mock-up
(App)
Improvised Paper
Mock-up
Digital Mock-up
Website
As per the guidelines of mentors, we
decided to improve the mock-up
We felt that the use of survey wont work, so
we added feedback questions to the paper
mock up.
Redesigned the mock up based on the
previous user feedback.
› Removal of enter page
› Correction of irregularities
› Change of Map
More accurate to the would be service
“First page is not important”
“ I did not understand: what do the green dots stand for? are they a signal of open or that they are suitable for me?”
“page is good and good for confirming. Send a request & new search -buttons could be in the other order”
“What are the priorities I should choose? they could be visible on the first page already (at least some of them)”
The service was well received.
Usability comments from users was useful
All the users liked the concept and one of
them even wanted to help in building the
service
2 of the users wanted to know from when
they can use it(app release)
The purpose of the Digital mock up was to test the usability and integrity of the service
Again irregularities were handled.
Few more features (services and libraries) added
This new version was not tested because in the implementation camp, we decided to change the focus of the service
The change of focus was to concentrate on 3
primary concepts namely
› Discovery
› Request
› Promotion
The previous app was not falling on this line.
The application was primarily based on the
evidence that users like the service to be
interactive.
› Evidence was the map listing in the digital app
The service was tested on big screen(Laptop) as well as small screen(Tablet)
The concept of service discovery can be targeted using the below interface
The users can request a service by making a
request at a particular library.
These requests can
See be seen on the
Interactive map
Finally the users or citizens can promote a
request by voting.
With promotion, user can learn about new
services or already existing services
“A good idea! Very useful and quick. I will
use it a lot”
“The outlook is clear and it seems easy to
use”
“It seems easy to use and it's good to see all
libraries on the map.”
“Very good service but not for me(since I’m
looking for quiet space)”
“ease of use + clean interface”
“Add all libraries in the map and also routes
how you can get there by using public
transports.”
“More Libraries, may be in future all libraries
in the world. And the list of libraries at the
edge”
“Would be useful to have this also in finnish”
How would you describe the usefulness of
the service? [1 - least useful, 5 - most
useful]
› Average rating 4.14
How would you describe the ease of use
of the service? [1 - least desirable, 5 -
most desirable]
› Average rating 4.14
Mikko
› “Request for renting things @ Library 10”› “It would be great if there would be a possibility in every library at Metropolitan area to
rent things from another people. Like for example you could rent a digital camera
from the library. The camera would be delivered to the library by someone that don´t
use it so often.”
Rous
› “something for everyone @ Sello”› “In library there should be a quiet place for those who are studying. Usually people
talk so there should be separated places for studying people. Then there could be a
room for people to hang out and there you could talk as loud as you want to. It would
be a place for young people but also olders.”