184

References

Ädel, A., & Erman, B. (2012). Recurrent word combinations in academic writing by native and non-native speakers of English: A lexical bundles approach. English for Specific Purposes , 31 (2), 81–92. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2011.08.004

Alexander, O. (2010). The leap into TEAP: The role of the BALEAP competency framework in the professional development of new EAP teachers . Paper presented at the English for Academic Purposes in University Settings: Teacher and Learner Competencies Conference, Bilkent University, Ankara, Turkey, 18–19 June. Retrieved from http://www.sml.hw.ac.uk/documents/research/Bilkent_Paper2010.pdf

Alexander, O. (2012). Exploring teacher beliefs in teaching EAP at low proficiency levels. Journal of English for Academic Purposes , 11 (2), 99–111. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2011.12.001

Alexander, O. (2013). Uncovering teacher beliefs in EAP. In L. Blaj-Ward & S. Brewer (Eds), Snapshots of EAP research journeys (pp. 11–14). London: BALEAP. Retrieved from http://www.baleap.org.uk/media/uploads/restes/Snapshots_of_EAP_Research_Journeys_May2013–1.pdf

Alexander, O., Argent, S., & Spencer, J. (2008). EAP essentials: A teacher’s guide to principles and practice . Reading: Garnet Education.

Altbach, P. G., & Knight, J. (2007). The internationalisation of higher education: Motivation and realities. Journal of Studies in International Education , 11 (3), 290–305. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1028315307303542

Arkoudis, S., Baik, C., & Richardson, S. (2012). English language standards in higher education . Camberwell, Vic: ACER.

Askew, S., & Lodge, C. (2000). Gifts, ping-pong and loops: Linking feedback and learning. In S. Askew (Ed), Feedback for learning (pp. 1–18). London: Routledge Falmer.

Augsburg, T. (2005). Becoming interdisciplinary: An introduction to interdisciplinary studies (2nd ed.). Dubuque, Iowa: Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company.

AUQA (2009). Good practice principles for English language proficiency for interna-tional students in Australian universities . Retrieved from http://pandora.nla.gov.au/pan/127066/20110826–0004/www.auqa.edu.au/files/otherpublications/good%20practice%20principles%20for%20english%20language%20profi-ciency%20report.pdf

Bachman, L., & Palmer, A. (2010). Language assessment in practice: Developing language assessments and justifying their use in the real world . Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Bakhtin, M. (1981). Discourse in the novel. In M. Holquist (Ed), The dialogic imagi-nation: Four essays by M. Bakhtin , trans. C. Emerson & M. Holquist (pp. 259–422). Austin: University of Texas. Press.

BALEAP (2008). Competency framework for teachers of English for academic purposes . Retrieved from http://www.baleap.org.uk/projects/teap-scheme

References 185

BALEAP (2011). The BALEAP accreditation scheme handbook . Retrieved from http://www.baleap.org.uk/media/uploads/pdfs/baleap-accreditation-scheme-hand-book.pdf

BALEAP (2013). Can do framework for EAP syllabus design and assessment . Retrieved from http://www.baleap.org.uk/media/uploads/teap/Can_Do_Framework__with_sample_activities_April_2013.pdf

Banerjee, J., & Wall, D. (2006). Assessing and reporting performances on pre-ses-sional EAP courses: Developing a final assessment checklist and investigating its validity. Journal of English for Academic Purposes , 5 (1), 50–69. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2005.11.003

Barcelos, A. (2006). Researching beliefs about SLA: A critical review. In A. Barcelos & P. Kalaja (Eds), Beliefs about SLA: New research approaches (pp. 7–34). New York: Springer.

Barkhuizen, G., & Wette, R. (2008). Narrative frames for investigating the experiences of language teachers. System , 36 (3), 372–387. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2008.02.002

Barkhuizen, G., Benson, P., & Chik, A. (2013). Narrative inquiry in language teaching and learning research . Abingdon: Routledge.

Barnard, R., & Burns, A. (2012). Introduction. In R. Barnard & A. Burns (Eds), Researching language teacher cognition and practice: International case studies (pp. 1–10). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.

Barnard, R., & Burns, A. (Eds) (2012). Researching language teacher cognition and practice: International case studies . Bristol: Multilingual Matters.

Basturkmen, H. (2010). Developing courses in English for specific purposes . Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Baxter Magolda, M. B. (1992). Knowing and reasoning in college: Gender-related patterns in students’ intellectual development . San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Bazeley, P., & Jackson, K. (2013). Qualitative data analysis with NVivo . London: Sage. Becher, T., & Trowler, P. R. (2001). Tribes and territories: Intellectual enquiry and the

culture of disciplines (2nd ed.). Buckingham: Open University Press. Belcher, D. (2013). The future of ESP research: Resources for access and choice.

In B. Paltridge & S. Starfield (Eds), The handbook of English for specific purposes (pp. 535–551). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

Belcher, D., Johns, A. M., & Paltridge, B. (Eds) (2011). New directions in English for specific purposes research . Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

Benesch, S. (2001). Critical English for academic purposes: Theory, politics and prac-tice . Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Bennett, J. (2008). On becoming a global soul: A path to engagement during study abroad. In V. Savicki (Ed), Developing intercultural competence and transfor-mation (pp. 13–31). Sterling, VA: Stylus.

Benson, P. (2011). Teaching and researching autonomy (2nd ed.). Abingdon: Routledge. Benson, P., Barkhuizen, G., Bodycott, P., & Brown, J. (2014). Second language iden-

tity in narratives of study abroad . Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Biber, D. (1988). Variation across speech and writing . Cambridge: Cambridge

University Press. Biber, D., Conrad, S., Reppen, R., Byrd, P., & Helt, M. (2002). Speaking and writing

in the university: A multi-dimensional comparison. TESOL Quarterly , 36 (1), 9–48. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3588359

186 References

Biggs, J. B., & Tang, C. S. K. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university (4th ed.). Maidenhead: Open University Press.

Bitchener, J. (2010). Writing an applied linguistics thesis or dissertation: A guide to presenting empirical research . Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Blackmore, J. (2009). Academic pedagogies, quality logics and performative univer-sities: Evaluating teaching and what students want. Studies in Higher Educa-tion , 34 (8), 857–872. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03075070902898664

Blaj-Ward, L. (2010, 30 November). First ResTES event: info and call for presenta-tions [Message to BALEAP electronic mailing list].

Blaj-Ward, L. (forthcoming). Building research capacity through an AcLits-inspired pedagogical framework. In T. Lillis, K. Harrington, M. Lea, & S. Mitchell (Eds), Working with academic literacies: Research, theory, design .

Blaj-Ward, L., & Brewer, S. M. (2013). Snapshots of EAP research journeys . London: BALEAP. Retrieved from http://www.baleap.org.uk/media/uploads/restes/Snapshots_of_EAP_Research_Journeys_May2013–1.pdf

Bloch, J. (2013). Technology and ESP. In B. Paltridge & S. Starfield (Eds), The handbook of English for specific purposes (pp. 385–401). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

Borg, S. (2006). Teacher cognition and language education : Research and practice. London: Continuum.

Borg, S. (2012). Current approaches to language teacher cognition research: A methodological analysis. In R. Barnard & A. Burns (Eds), Researching language teacher cognition and practice: International case studies (pp. 11–29). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.

Borg, S. (2013). Teacher research in language teaching . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Bowles, H., & Seedhouse, P. (2007). Interactional competence and the LSP classroom. In H. Bowles & P. Seedhouse (Eds), Conversation analysis and LSP (pp. 305–329). Berlin: Peter Lang.

Brewer, S. M., & Blaj-Ward, L. (2013, September). Snapshots of EAP research(er) jour-neys . Poster presented at the BAAL Annual Conference, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, UK.

Briggs, A. R. J., Coleman, M., & Morrison, M. (Eds) (2012). Research methods in educational leadership and management (3rd ed.). London: Sage.

British Council (2012). Accreditation UK handbook 2012 and 2013 . Retrieved from http://www.britishcouncil.org/2012–13_accreditation_uk_handbook.pdf

Brooks, L. (2009). Interacting in pairs in a test of oral proficiency: Co-constructing a better performance. Language Testing , 26 (3), 341–366. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0265532209104666

Brooks, R., & Waters, J. (2011). Student mobilities, migration and the internationalisa-tion of higher education. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Brown, E., G. Gibbs, & Glover, C. (2003). Evaluation tools for investigating the impact of assessment regimes on student learning. Bioscience Education E-Journal, 2 . Retrieved from http://journals.heacademy.ac.uk/doi/pdf/10.3108/beej.2003.02000006

Brown, J. D. (2009a). Foreign and second language needs analysis. In M. H. Long & C. J. Doughty (Eds), The handbook of language teaching (pp. 269–293). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.

References 187

Brown, J. D. (2009b). Open-response items in questionnaires. In J. Heigham & R. Croker (Eds), Research methods in applied linguistics (pp. 200–219). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Brown, J. D. (2012). Commentary: Questionnaires. In R. Barnard & A. Burns (Eds), Researching language teacher cognition in practice: International case studies (pp. 39–44). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.

Bruce, I. (2008). Academic writing and genre . London: Continuum. Bruce, I. (2011). Theory and concepts of English for academic purposes . Basingstoke:

Palgrave Macmillan. Burns, A. (2010). Doing action research in English language teaching: A guide for prac-

titioners . New York: Routledge. Burton, J. (2012). Commentary: Oral reflective journals. In R. Barnard & A. Burns

(Eds), Researching language teacher cognition in practice: International case studies (pp. 171–177). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.

Chan, C. S. C. (2009). Forging a link between research and pedagogy: A holistic framework for evaluating Business English materials. English for Specific Purposes , 28 (2), 125–136. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2008.12.001

Chang, Y.-Y. (2012). The use of questions by professors in lectures given in English: Influences of disciplinary cultures. English for Specific Purposes , 31 (2), 103–116. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2011.08.002

Chapelle, C. (Ed) (2013) . The encyclopaedia of applied linguistics . Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

Charles, M. (2012). ‘Proper vocabulary and juicy collocations’: EAP students eval-uate do-it-yourself corpus-building. English for Specific Purposes , 31 (2), 93–102. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2011.12.003

Charles, M. (2014). Getting the corpus habit: EAP students’ long-term use of personal corpora. English for Specific Purposes , 35 . doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2013.11.004

Cheng, A. (2006). Understanding learners and learning in ESP genre-based instruc-tion. English for Specific Purposes , 25 (1), 76–89. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2005.07.002

Cheng, A. (2011). EAP classroom research: Basic considerations and future research questions. In D. Belcher, A. M. Johns, & B. Paltridge (Eds), New directions in English for specific purposes research (pp. 44–72). Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.

Cheng, M. (2011). ‘Transforming the learner’ versus ‘passing the exam’: Understanding the gap between academic and student definitions of quality. Quality in Higher Education , 17 (1), 3–17. doi: http://dx.doi.org./10.1080/13538322.2011.554634

Clifton, J. (2006). Facilitator talk. ELT Journal , 60 (2), 142–150. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/elt/cci101

Coleman, J. (2012). Foreword. In A. Doiz, D. Lasagabaster, & J. M. Sierra (Eds), English-medium instruction at universities: Global challenges . Bristol: Multilingual Matters.

Coleman, M. (2012). Interviews. In A. R. J. Briggs, M. Coleman, & M. Morrison (Eds), Research methods in educational leadership and management (3rd ed.) (pp. 250–265). London: Sage.

Connolly, P. (2007). Quantitative data analysis in education: A critical introduction using SPSS . Abingdon: Routledge.

188 References

Copland, F., & Garton, S. (2011). ‘I felt that I do live in the UK now’: International students’ self-reports of their English language speaking experiences on a pre-sessional programme. Language and Education , 25 (3), 241–255. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2011.566617

Cowie, N. (2009). Observation. In J. Heigham & R. A. Croker (Eds), Qualitative research in applied linguistics: A practical introduction . Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Cuthbert, R. (2011). Failing the challenge of institutional evaluation: How and why managerialism flourishes. In M. Saunders, P. Trowler, & V. Bamber (Eds), Reconceptualising evaluation in higher education: The practice turn (pp. 133–138). Maidenhead: Open University Press.

Davidson, F., & Cho, Y. (2001). Issues in EAP test development: What one institu-tion and its history tell us. In J. Flowerdew & M. Peacock (Eds), Research perspec-tives on English for Academic Purposes (pp. 268–297). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Deane, M., & O’Neill, P. (Eds) (2011). Writing in the disciplines . Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

de Chazal, E. (2014). English for Academic Purposes . Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Denicolo, P. (Ed) (2014). Achieving impact in research . London: Sage. Deroey, K. L. B., & Taverniers, M. (2012). Just remember this : Lexicogrammatical

relevance markers in lectures. English for Specific Purposes , 31 (4), 221–233. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2012.05.001

Doiz, A., Lasagabaster, D., & Sierra, J. M. (Eds) (2012a). English-medium instruction at universities: Global challenges . Bristol: Multilingual Matters.

Doiz, A., Lasagabaster, D., & Sierra, J. M. (2012b). English as L3 at a bilingual university in the Basque country, Spain. In A. Doiz, D. Lasagabaster, & J. M. Sierra (Eds), English-medium instruction at universities: Global challenges . Bristol: Multilingual Matters.

Donahue, C. (2011). Cross-cultural approaches to writing and disciplinarity. In M. Deane & P. O’Neill (Eds), Writing in the disciplines (pp. 14–29). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Douglas, D. (2013). ESP and assessment. In B. Paltridge & S. Starfield (Eds), The handbook of English for specific purposes (pp. 367–383). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

Dunworth, K. (2013). Degrees of proficiency: Building a strategic approach to univer-sity students’ English language assessment and development . Office for Learning and Teaching Report. Retrieved from http://www.olt.gov.au/project-degrees-proficiency-building-strategic-approach-university-studentsapos-english-language-ass

Durrant, P., & Mathews-Aydinli, J. (2011). A function-first approach to identi-fying formulaic language in academic writing. English for Specific Purposes , 30 (1), 58–72. doi: http://dx.doi.or/10.1016/j.esp.2010.05.002

Edge, J. (2003). Alternative discourses: An interview with Julian Edge. ELT Journal , 57 (4), 386–394. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/elt/57.4.386

Edvardsson Stiwne, E., &Jungert, T. (2010). Engineering students’ experiences of transition from study to work. Journal of Education and Work , 23 (5), 417–437. doi: http://dx.doi.org/101080/13639080.2010.515967

References 189

Elder, C., Bright, C., & Bennett, S. (2007). The role of language proficiency in academic success: Perspectives from a New Zealand university. Melbourne Papers in Language Testing , 12 (1), 24–58. Retrieved from http://wayback.archive-it.org/1148/20130404065745/http://ltrc.unimelb.edu.au/mplt/papers/12_1_2_Elder.pdf

English, F. (2011). Student writing and genre: Reconfiguring academic knowledge . London: Bloomsbury.

Evans, S. (2008). Reading reaction journals in EAP courses. ELT Journal , 62 (3), 240–247. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccm018

Farrell, T. (2007). Reflective language teaching: From research to practice . London: Continuum.

Farrell, T. C. S. (2012). Commentary: Think aloud. In R. Barnard & A. Burns (Eds), Researching language teacher cognition in practice: International case studies (pp. 137–141). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.

Feak, C. B., & Swales, J. M. (2013). Tensions between the old and the new in EAP textbook revision: A tale of two projects. In N. Harwood (Ed), English language teaching textbooks (pp. 299–319). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Field, J. (2012). Oral reflective journals. In R. Barnard & A. Burns (Eds), Researching language teacher cognition in practice: International case studies (pp. 162–171). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.

Fitch, K. (2013). A disciplinary perspective: The internationalisation of Australian public relations education. Journal of Studies in International Education , 17 (2), 136–147. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1028315312474898

Flint, A., Oxley, A., Helm, P., & Bradley, S. (2009). Preparing for success: One institution’s aspirational and student-focused response to the National Student Survey. Teaching in Higher Education , 14 (6), 607–618. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13562510903315035

Flowerdew, J. (2001). Ethnographically inspired approaches to the study of academic discourse. In J. Flowerdew (Ed), Academic discourse (pp. 235–252). Harlow: Longman.

Flowerdew, J. (2013). Discourse in English language education . Abingdon: Routledge.

Flowerdew, L. (2005). ‘Integrating traditional and critical approaches to syllabus design: the “what”, the “how” and the “why?” ’. Journal of English for Academic Purposes , 4 (2), 135–147. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2004.09.001

Flowerdew, L. (2013). Needs analysis and curriculum development in ESP. In B. Paltridge & S. Starfield (Eds), The handbook of English for specific purposes (pp. 325–346). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

Foster, M. (2010). Online study skills resource SPICE. HEA Case study . Retrieved from: http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/resources/detail/internationalisation/case_story_induction_Monika_Foster

Foster, M. (2011). Engaging students in enhanced academic transitions – a case of online study skills resource SPICE (Student Pre-arrival Induction for Continuing Education). Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education , 3 . Retrieved from http://www.aldinhe.ac.uk/ojs/index.php?journal=jldhe&page=article&op=view&path%5B%5D=71&path%5B%5D=80

Foster, M. (2013). Engaging students in academic transition. In J. Ryan (Ed), Cross-cultural teaching and learning for home and international students:

190 References

Internationalisation of pedagogy and curriculum in higher education (pp. 97–109). London: Routledge.

Freeman, D. (2012). Commentary: Focus groups. In R. Barnard & A. Burns (Eds), Researching language teacher cognition in practice: International case studies (pp. 80–86). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.

Frohman, R. (2012). Collaborative efforts work! Reflections on a two-year relation-ship between Faculty of Health and International Student Services – Language and Learning Unit. Journal of Academic Language and Learning , 6 (3), A47–A58. Retrieved from http://journal.aall.org.au/index.php/jall/article/view/185/154

Fulcher, G., & Davidson, F. (Eds) (2012). The Routledge handbook of language testing . London: Routledge.

Ganobcsik-Williams, L. (Ed) (2006). Teaching academic writing in higher education . Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Ganobcsik-Williams, L. (2011). The writing centre as a locus for WiD, WAC, and Whole-institution writing provision. In M. Deane & P. O’Neill (Eds), Writing in the disciplines (pp. 250–264). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Garton, S. (2008). Teacher beliefs and interaction in the language classroom. In S. Garton & K. Richards (Eds), Professional encounters in TESOL: Discourses of teachers in teaching (pp. 67–86). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Gebhard, J. (2012). Commentary: Observation. In R. Barnard & A. Burns (Eds), Researching language teacher cognition in practice: International case studies (pp. 119–124). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.

Gebril, A. (2009). Score generalisability of academic writing tasks: Does one test method fit it all? Language Testing , 26 (4), 507–531. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0265532209340188

Geddie, K. (2012). Constructing transnational higher education spaces: International branch campus developments in the United Arab Emirates. In R. Brooks, A. Fuller, & J. Waters (Eds), Changing spaces of education: New perspectives on the nature of learning (pp. 39–58). Abingdon: Routledge.

Gladman, A. (2012). Focus groups. In R. Barnard & A. Burns (Eds), Researching language teacher cognition in practice: International case studies (pp. 68–80). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.

Goodfellow, R., & Lea, M. R. (Eds) (2013). Literacy in the digital university: Critical perspectives on learning, scholarship and technology . Abingdon: Routledge.

Grammatosi, F., & Harwood, N. (2013). An experienced teacher’s use of the text-book on an academic English course. In N. Harwood (Ed), English language teaching textbooks (pp. 178–204). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Green, A. (2014). Exploring language assessment and testing: Language in action . Abingdon: Routledge.

Gu, Q. (2011). An emotional journey of change: The case of Chinese students in UK higher education. In L. Jin & M. Cortazzi (Eds), Researching Chinese learners: Skills, perceptions and intercultural adaptations (pp. 212–232). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Hamp-Lyons, L. (2011a). English for academic purposes. In E. Hinkel (Ed), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 89–105). New York: Routledge.

Hamp-Lyons, L. (2011b). Editorial. English for academic purposes: 2011 and beyond. Journal of English for Academic Purposes , 10 (1), 2–4. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2011.01.001

References 191

Harrington, K. (2011). The role of assessment in ‘Writing in the Disciplines’. In M. Deane & P. O’Neill (Eds), Writing in the disciplines (pp. 48–64). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Hartley, P., Hilsdon, J., Keenan, C., Sinfield, S., & Verity, M. (Eds) (2011). Learning development in higher education . Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Harwood, N. (2005). What do we want EAP teaching materials for? Journal of English for Academic Purposes , 4 (2), 149–161. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2004.07.008

Harwood, N. (Ed) (2010). English language teaching materials . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Harwood, N. (Ed) (2013). English language teaching textbooks . Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Hawkins, H. (2014). For creative geographies: Geography, visual arts and the making of worlds . Abingdon: Routledge.

HEFCE (2008). Counting what is measured or measuring what counts? League tables and their impact on higher education institutions in England . HEFCE. Retrieved from http://www.hefce.ac.uk/pubs/year/2008/200814/; http://www.hefce.ac.uk/media/hefce1/pubs/hefce/2008/0814/08_14.pdf

Heigham, J., & Croker, R. A. (Eds) (2009). Qualitative research in applied linguistics: A practical introduction . Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Hinkel, E. (Ed) (2011). Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning . New York: Routledge.

Holliday, A. (2007). Doing and writing qualitative research (2nd ed.). London: Sage.

Holme, R. & Chalauisaeng, B. (2006). The learner as needs analyst: The use of participatory appraisal in the EAP reading classroom. English for Specific Purposes , 25 (4), 403–419. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2006.01.003

Humphries, S. (2012). Observation. In R. Barnard & A. Burns (Eds), Researching language teacher cognition in practice: International case studies (pp. 109–119). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.

Hyland, F., & Lo, M. (2006). Examining interaction in the teaching practicum: Issues of language, power and control. Mentoring and Tutoring , 14 (2), 163–186. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13611260500493535

Hyland, K. (2005). Metadiscourse . London: Continuum. Hyland, K. (2006). English for academic purposes: An advanced resource book .

Abingdon: Routledge. Hyland, K. (2008). As can be seen: Lexical bundles and disciplinary variation.

English for Specific Purposes , 27 (1), 4–21. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2007.06.001

Hyland, K. (2009a). Academic discourse: English in a global context . London: Bloomsbury.

Hyland, K. (2009b). Specific purposes programmes. In M. H. Long & C. J. Doughty (Eds), The handbook of language teaching (pp. 201–217). Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.

Hyland, K. (2012). Disciplinary identities: Individuality and community in academic discourse . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

IIE (2013). English-taught master’s programs in Europe . Retrieved from http://www.iie.org/Research-and-Publications/Publications-and-Reports/IIE-Bookstore/English-Language-Masters-Briefing-Paper-2013-Update

192 References

Iwashita, N. (2005). An investigation of lexical profiles in performance on EAP speaking tasks. Spaan Working Papers , 3 , 101–112. Retrieved from http://www.cambridgemichigan.org/sites/default/files/resources/SpaanPapers/Spaan_V3_Iwashita.pdf

Jaques, D., & Salmon, G. (2007). Learning in groups: A handbook for face-to-face and online learning (4th ed.). London: Routledge.

Jenkins, J. (2013). English as a lingua franca in the international university . Abingdon: Routledge.

Jones, C., Ramanau, R., Cross, S., & Healing, G. (2010). Net generation or Digital Natives: Is there a distinct new generation entering university? Computers and Education , 54 (3), 722–732. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.09.022

Kennelly, R., Maldoni, A., & Davies, D. (2010). A case study: Do discipline-based programmes improve student learning outcomes? International Journal for Educational Integrity, 6 (1), 61–73. Retrieved from http://www.ojs.unisa.edu.au/index.php/IJEI/article/view/671/501

Kiely, R. (2000). Programme evaluation by teachers: An observational study (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.

Kinginger, C. (2009). Language learning and study abroad: A critical reading of research . Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Krause, K. L. (2011). Whole-of-university strategies for evaluating the student experience. In M. Saunders, P. Trowler, & V. Bamber (Eds), Reconceptualising evaluation in higher education: The practice turn (pp. 139–144). Maidenhead: Open University Press.

Krekeler, C. (2006). Language for special academic purposes (LSAP) testing: The effect of background knowledge revisited. Language Testing , 23 (1), 99–130. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1191/0265532206lt323oa

Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2012). How should the higher education workforce adapt to advancements in technology for teaching and learning. Internet and Higher Education , 15 (4), 247–254. doi: http://dx.doi.org10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.12.002

Kuteeva, M. (2011). Wikis and academic writing: changing the writer–reader relationship. English for Specific Purposes , 30 (1), 44–57. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2010.04.007

Lea, M. R. (2004). Academic literacies: A pedagogy for course design. Studies in Higher Education , 29 (6), 739–756. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0307507042000287230

Lea, M. R. (2013). Reclaiming literacies: Competing textual practices in a digital higher education. Teaching in Higher Education , 18 (1), 106–118. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2012.756465

Lea, M. R., & Jones, S. (2011). Digital literacies in higher education: Exploring textual and technological practice. Studies in Higher Education , 36 (4), 377–393. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03075071003664021

Lea, M., & Street, B. (1998). Student writing in higher education: An academic literacies approach. Studies in Higher Education , 23 (2), 157–172. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03075079812331380364

Lea, M. R., & Street, B. V. (2006). The ‘Academic Literacies’ model: Theory and applications. Theory into Practice , 45 (4), 368–377. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4504_11

References 193

Leask, B. (2009). Using formal and informal curricula to improve interactions between home and international students. Journal of Studies in International Education , 13 (2), 205–221. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1028315308329786

Leask, B. (2013). Internationalising the curriculum in the disciplines: Imagining new possibilities. Journal of Studies in International Education , 17 (2), 103–118. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1028315312475090

Lee, I. (2003). L2 writing teachers’ perspectives, practices and problems regarding error feedback. Assessing Writing , 8 (3), 216–237. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2003.08.002

Leki, I. (2000). Writing, literacy, and applied linguistics. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics , 20 , 99–115. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0267190500200068

Leung, M. W. H., & Waters, J. L. (2013). British degrees made in Hong Kong: An enquiry into the role of space and place in transnational education. Asia Pacific Education Review , 14 (1), 43–53. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12564–013–9250–4

Levin, D. M. (2001). Language learners’ sociocultural interaction in a study abroad context (Unpublished PhD dissertation). Indiana University, Bloomington, IN.

Li, J. (2012). Think aloud. In R. Barnard & A. Burns (Eds), Researching language teacher cognition in practice: International case studies (pp. 128–136). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.

Lillis, T. (2006). Moving towards an ‘Academic Literacies’ pedagogy: Dialogues of participation. In L. Ganobcsik-Williams (Ed), Teaching academic writing in higher education (pp. 30–45). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Lillis, T., & Scott, M. (2007). Defining academic literacies research: Issues of epis-temology, ideology and strategy. Journal of Applied Linguistics , 4 (1), 5–32.

Liu, J.-Y., Chang, Y.-J., Yang, F.-Y., & Sun, Y.-C. (2011). Is what I need what I want? Reconceptualising college students’ needs in English courses for general and specific/academic purposes. Journal of English for Academic Purposes , 10 (4), 271–280. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2011.09.002

Long, M. H. (2005). Methodological issues in learner needs analysis. In M. H. Long (Ed), Second language needs analysis (pp. 19–76). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Long, M. H. (Ed) (2005). Second language needs analysis . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Lowie, W., & Seton, B. (2013). Essential statistics for applied linguistics . Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Lucas, U., & Leng Tan, P. (2013). Developing a capacity to engage in critical reflection: Students’ ‘ways of knowing’ within an undergraduate business and accounting programme. Studies in Higher Education , 38 (1), 104–123. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.569706

Macalister, J. (2011). Refreshing a writing course: The role of evaluation. In J. Macalister & P. Nation (Eds), Case studies in language curriculum design: Concepts and approaches in action around the world (pp. 114–128). New York: Routledge.

Macallister, C. (2013). Researching one’s own approach to EAP management and curriculum: How a library bound researcher became an EAP ethnographer. In L. Blaj-Ward & S. Brewer (Eds), Snapshots of EAP research journeys (pp. 30–33). London: BALEAP. Retrieved from http://www.baleap.org.uk/media/uploads/restes/Snapshots_of_EAP_Research_Journeys_May2013–1.pdf

194 References

Manh, L. D. (2012). English as a medium of instruction in Asian universities: The case of Vietnam. Language Education in Asia , 3 (2), 263–267. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5746/LEiA/12/V3/I2/A14/Manh

Masuhara, H., & Tomlinson, B. (2010). Applications of the research results for materials development. In B. Tomlinson & H. Masuhara (Eds), Research for mate-rials development in language learning: Evidence for best practice (pp. 410–424). London: Continuum.

McGrath, I. (2002). Materials evaluation and design for language teaching . Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

McGrath, I. (2013). Teaching materials and the roles of EFL/ESL teachers. Practice and theory . London: Bloomsbury.

McGuigan, N., & Kern, T. (2010). Leaping over the perceptual threshold in accounting courses: Embracing sustainable assessment and learning design . Paper presented at the ATN Assessment Conference 2010. Assessment: Sustainability, Diversity and Innovation. Retrieved from http://www.iml.uts.edu.au/pdfs/McGUIGAN.pdf

Merrick, B. (2004). Broadening our horizons: International students in UK universities and colleges . London: UKCOSA.

Mertova, P. (2013). Internationalisation and quality in higher education: Perspectives of English, Australian and Czech senior academics. In J. Ryan (Ed), Cross-cultural teaching and learning for home and international students (pp. 69–81). London: Routledge.

Miller, D. (2011). ESL reading textbooks vs. university textbooks: Are we giving our students the input they may need? Journal of English for Academic Purposes , 10 (1), 32–46. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2010.12.002

Mills, D., & Morton, M. (2013). Ethnography in education . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Mitchell, S., & Evison, A. (2006). Exploring the potential of writing for educa-tional change at Queen Mary, University of London. In L. Ganobcsik-Williams (Ed), Teaching academic writing in UK higher education: Theories, practices and models (pp. 68–84). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Monroe, J. (2002). Writing and revising the disciplines . Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

Monroe, J. (Ed) (2003). Local knowledges, local practices: Writing in the disciplines at Cornell . Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.

Montgomery, C. (2010). Understanding the international student experience . Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Munn, P. (2008). Building research capacity collaboratively: Can we take owner-ship of our future? British Educational Research Journal , 34 (4), 413–430. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01411920802065664

Myers, G. (2010). The discourse of blogs and wikis . London: Continuum. Nesi, H., & Gardner, S. (2006). Variation in disciplinary culture: University tutors’

views on assessed writing tasks. In R. Kiely, P. Rea-Dickins, H. Woodfield, & G. Clibbon (Eds), Language, culture and identity in applied linguistics (pp. 99–117). British Studies in Applied Linguistics, 21. London: Equinox Publishing.

Nesi, H., & Gardner, S. (2012). Genres across the disciplines: Student writing in higher education . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Ng, J. (2012). Questionnaires. In R. Barnard & A. Burns (Eds), Researching language teacher cognition in practice: International case studies (pp. 30–38). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.

References 195

Nicol, D. (2013). Resituating feedback from the reactive to the proactive. In D. Boud & E. Molloy (Eds), Feedback in higher and professional education: Understanding it and doing it well . Abingdon: Routledge.

Norton, L. S. (2009). Action research in teaching and learning: A practical guide to conducting pedagogical research in universities . Abingdon: Routledge.

OECD (2013). Education at a glance . Retrieved from http://www.keepeek.com/Digital-Asset-Management/oecd/education/education-at-a-glance-2013/indicator-c4-who-studies-abroad-and-where_Eag-2013–23-en#page1

Orsmond, P., & Merry, S. (2010). Feedback alignment: Effective and ineffective links between tutors’ and students’ understanding of coursework feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education , 36 (2), 125–136. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02602930903201651

Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research , 62 (3), 307–332. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/00346543062003307

Paltridge, B., & Phakiti, A. (Eds) (2010). Continuum companion to research methods in applied linguistics . London: Continuum.

Paltridge, B., & Starfield, S. (Eds) (2013). The handbook of English for specific purposes. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

Paran, A., & Sercu, L. (Eds) (2010). Testing the untestable in foreign language educa-tion . Buffalo, NY: Multilingual Matters.

Parkinson, J. (2011). The Discussion section as argument: The language used to prove knowledge claims. English for Specific Purposes , 30 (3), 164–175. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2011.03.001

Pearlman, D. M., & Gates, N. A. (2010). Hosting Business Meetings and Special Events in Virtual Worlds: A Fad or the Future? Journal of Convention and Event Tourism , 11 (4), 247–265. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15470148.2010.530535

Perkins, D. N., & Salomon, G. (1988). Teaching for transfer. [Rpt. in] T. Augsburg (Ed) Becoming Interdisciplinary (2nd ed.) (pp. 146–154). Dubuque, Iowa: Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company.

Phipps, S., & Borg, S. (2009). Exploring tensions between teachers’ grammar teaching beliefs and practices. System , 37 (3), 380–390. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2009.03.002

Pilcher, N., Cortazzi, M., & Jin, L. (2011). Different waves crashing into different coastlines? Mainland Chinese learners doing postgraduate disserta-tions in the UK. In L. Jin & M. Cortazzi (Eds), Researching Chinese learners: Skills, perceptions and intercultural adaptations (pp. 292–313). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Post, D. H. (2010). The transition from teaching general English to English for academic purposes: An investigation into the challenges encountered by teachers (Unpublished master’s dissertation). University of Bath, Bath, UK.

Prensky, M. (2011). Digital wisdom and homo sapiens digital. In M. Thomas (Ed), Deconstructing digital natives: Young people, technology and the new literacies (pp. 15–29). Abingdon: Routledge.

Prosser, M. (2011). Student ‘satisfaction’ or student ‘experience’: Interpreting and acting on evaluation results. In M. Saunders, P. Trowler, & V. Bamber (Eds), Reconceptualising evaluation in higher education: The practice turn . Maidenhead: Open University Press.

196 References

Purser, E. (2011). Developing academic literacy in context: Trends in Australia. In M. Deane & P. O’Neill (Eds), Writing in the disciplines (pp. 30–47). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

QAA (2013a). Educational oversight: One year on . Gloucester: The Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education. Retrieved from www.qaa.ac.uk/Publications/InformationAndGuidance/Documents/EO-one-year-on.pdf

QAA (2013b). Conference programme. Educational Oversight: Enhancing quality in UK higher education . 19 February 2013, Senate House, London, UK.

Qian, D. (2007). Assessing university students: Searching for an English language exit test. RELC Journal , 38 (1), 18–37. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0033688206076156

Read, J. (2008). Identifying academic language needs through diagnostic assess-ment. Journal of English for Academic Purposes , 7 (3), 180–190. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2008.02.001

Read, J. (2013). Issues in post-entry language assessment in English-medium universities. Language Teaching , FirstView Article, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0261444813000190

Read, J., & von Randow, J. (2013). A university post-entry English language assessment: Charting the changes. International Journal of English Studies , 13 (2), 89–110. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.6018/ijes.13.2.185931

Reason, R. (1998). Three approaches to participative inquiry. In N. K. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds), Strategies of qualitative research (pp. 261–291). London: Sage.

Rees, G., Baron, S., Boyask, R., & Taylor, C. (2007). Research-capacity building, professional learning and the social practices of educational research. British Educational Research Journal , 33 (5), 761–779. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01411920701582447

Rhoads, R., & Szelényi, K. (2011). Global citizenship and the university: Advancing social life and relations in an interdependent world . Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Richards, L. (2009). Handling qualitative data: A practical guide (2nd ed.). London: Sage.

Richardson, J. T. E. (2009). What can students’ perceptions of academic quality tell us? Research using the Course Experience Questionnaire. In M. Tight, K. H. Mok, J. Huisman, & C. C. Morphew (Eds), The Routledge international handbook of higher education (pp. 199–210). Abingdon: Routledge.

Richardson, L., & St Pierre, E. (2005). Writing: A Method of Inquiry. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds), Handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed.) (pp. 959–978). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Riddle, M. D., & Arnold, M. V. (2007). The day experience method: A resource kit. Retrieved from http://repository.unimelb.edu.au/10187/2059

Rizvi, F., & Lingard, B. (2010). Globalising education policy . Abingdon: Routledge. Robbins, J. (2011). What works in academic request email: A genre analysis with

teacher and student perspectives (Unpublished master’s dissertation). University of Essex, Colchester, UK. Retrieved from http://www.baleap.org.uk/media/uploads/dissertation-awards/Joy_Robbins_Dissertation_2011.pdf

Robbins, J. (2013, April). What works in academic email: A genre analysis with teacher and student perspectives . Presentation at the BALEAP Biennial Conference, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK. Retrieved from http://prezi.com/

References 197

xpskimt64dh-/what-works-in-academic-email-a-genre-analysis-with-teacher-and-student-perspectives/

Roberts, P., & Dunworth, K. (2012). Staff and student perceptions of support serv-ices for international students in higher education. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management , 34 (5), 517–528. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2012.716000

Robinson, L. (2013). Allowing for development in the EAP post-observation conference: Towards a flexible post-observation model (Unpublished master’s dissertation). University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.

Robinson-Pant, A. (2005). Cross-cultural perspectives on educational research . Maidenhead: Open University Press.

Robson, S., Leat, D., Wall, K., & Lofthouse, R. (2013). Feedback or feed forward? Supporting Master’s students through effective assessment to enhance future learning. In J. Ryan (Ed), Cross-cultural teaching and learning for home and inter-national students: Internationalisation of pedagogy and curriculum in higher educa-tion (pp. 53–68). London: Routledge.

Sambell, K., McDowell, L., & Montgomery, C. (2013). Assessment for learning in higher education. Abingdon: Routledge.

Saunders, M., Trowler, P., & Bamber, V. (Eds) (2011). Reconceptualising evaluation in higher education: The practice turn . Maidenhead: Open University Press.

Schmitt, N. (2010). Researching vocabulary: A vocabulary research manual . Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Sedgley, M. (2011). The assignment success programme. In P. Hartley, J. Hilsdon, C. Keenan, S. Sinfield, & M. Verity (Eds), Learning development in higher education (pp. 102–113). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Shipton, A. (2005). Being and becoming a student in HE: An appreciation of an evolving sense of self (Unpublished MPhil thesis). College of York St John, York, UK.

Shreeve, A. (2011). ‘Tell us about it!’ Evaluating what helps students from diverse backgrounds to succeed at the University of the Arts London. In M. Saunders, P. Trowler, & V. Bamber (Eds), Reconceptualising evaluation in higher education: The practice turn (pp. 181–185). Maidenhead: Open University Press.

Shreeve, A., & Blythman, M. (2011). Evaluating a UK Centre for Excellence in Teaching and Learning: Bottom-up evaluation in a top-down setting. In M. Saunders, P. Trowler, & V. Bamber (Eds), Reconceptualising evaluation in higher education: The practice turn (pp. 177–180). Maidenhead: Open University Press.

Sloan, D., & Porter, E. (2009). The management of English language support in postgraduate education: Changing student and staff perceptions. International Journal of Management Education , 7 (2), 51–58. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3794/ijme.72.188

Sloan, D., & Porter, E. (2010). Changing international student and busi-ness staff perceptions of in-sessional EAP: Using the CEM model. Journal of English for Academic Purposes , 9 (3), 198–210. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2010.03.001

Sloan, D., Porter, E., & Alexander, O. (2013). Yes, you can teach an old dog new tricks. Contextualisation, embedding and mapping: the CEM model, a new way to engage staff and students in the delivery of an English language and study skills support programme: a case study of Heriot-Watt and Northumbria

198 References

University. Innovations in Education and Teaching International , 50 (3), 284–296. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2012.760779

Smith, D. E. (2005). Institutional ethnography: A sociology for people . Lanham, MD: Alta Mira.

Smith, D. E. (Ed) (2006). Institutional ethnography as practice. Lanham, MD: Alta Mira.

Sovič, S. (2008). The international students’ experience project . Retrieved from http://www.arts.ac.uk/librarylearningandteaching/clipcetl/projects/internationalstudentsexperience/

Sovič, S. (2013). Classroom encounters: International students’ perceptions of tutors in the creative arts. In S. Sovič & M. Blythman (Eds), International students negotiating higher education (pp. 87–103). Abingdon: Routledge.

Stappenbelt, B., & Barrett-Lennard, S. (2008). Teaching smarter to improve the English communication proficiency of international engineering students – Collaborations between content and language specialists at the University of Western Australia. Australasian Journal of Engineering Education , 14 (2), 115–124. Retrieved from http://www.engineersmedia.com.au/journals/aaee/pdf/AJEE_14_2_Stappenbelt.pdf

Stoller, F. L., Horn, B., Grabe, W., & Robinson, M. S. (2005). Creating and vali-dating assessment instruments for a discipline-specific writing course: An inter-disciplinary approach. Journal of Applied Linguistics , 2 , 75–104.

Stoller, F. L., & Robinson, M. S. (2013). An interdisciplinary textbook project: Charting the paths taken. In N. Harwood (Ed), English language teaching text-books (pp. 262–298). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Swales, J. M. (2005). Research genres: Exploration and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Swales, J. M. (2009). When there is no perfect text: Approaches to the EAP practi-tioner’s dilemma. Journal of English for Academic Purposes , 8 (1), 5–13. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2008.11.003

Swales, J. M., Barks, D., Ostermann, A. C., & Simpson, R. C. (2001). Between critique and accommodation: Reflections on an EAP course for Masters of Architecture students. English for Specific Purposes , 20 (S1), 439–458. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0889–4906(01)00020–5

Tagg, C. (2012). The discourse of text messaging: Analysis of SMS communication . London: Continuum.

TEQSA (2013). TEQSA and the regulation of ELICOS . Retrieved from http://www.teqsa.gov.au/sites/default/files/FAQs_TEQSAandTheRegulationOfELICOS.pdf

Terraschke, A., & Wahid, R. (2011). The impact of EAP study on the academic experiences of international postgraduate students in Australia. Journal of English for Academic Purposes , 10 (3), 173–182. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2011.05.003

Thaiss, C. J., & Zawacki, T. M. (2006). Engaged writers and dynamic disciplines: Research on the academic writing life . Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook.

Tight, M. (2012). Researching higher education (2nd ed.). Maidenhead: Society for Research into Higher Education/Open University Press.

Tomlinson, B., & Masuhara, H. (2010). Published research on materials develop-ment for language learning. In B. Tomlinson & H. Masuhara (Eds), Research for materials development in language learning: Evidence for best practice (pp. 1–18). London: Continuum.

References 199

Tribble, C. (2009). Writing academic English – a survey review of current published resources. ELT Journal , 63 (4), 400–417. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccp073

Trowler, P. (2012). Doing insider research in universities . Kindle Edition. http://www.amazon.co.uk/Research-Universities-Doctoral-Education-ebook/dp/B006JI3SGK/ref=pd_sim_kinc_2

Trowler, P., Saunders, M., & Bamber, V. (2012). Tribes and territories in the 21st century: Rethinking the significance of disciplines in higher education . Abingdon: Routledge.

Tsui, A. B. M., & Tollefson, J. W. (2007). Language policy and the construction of national cultural identity. In A. B. M. Tsui & J. W. Tollefson (Eds), Language policy, culture and identity in Asian contexts (pp. 1–24). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Turnbull James, K., & Collins, J. (2008). Meeting the challenge of leading in the 21st century: Beyond the deficit model of leadership development. In K. Turnbull James & J. Collins (Eds), Leadership learning: Knowledge into action (pp. 13–34). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Turner, Jo. (2010). Language in the academy: Cultural reflexivity and intercultural dynamics . Bristol: Multilingual matters.

Turner, Ju. (2011). The case for one-to-one academic advice for students. In P. Hartley, J. Hilsdon, C. Keenan, S. Sinfield, & M. Verity (Eds), Learning develop-ment in higher education (pp. 91–101). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

UKCISA (2011a). International student services in colleges and universities 2010–2011: A benchmarking survey . London: UKCISA. Retrieved from http://www.ukcisa.org.uk/Info-for-universities-colleges–schools/Publications–research/resources/22/International-student-services-in-colleges-and-universities-2010–11-a-benchmarking-survey-April-2011

UKCISA (2011b). International student services in colleges and universities 2010–2011: Self-audit tool . Retrieved from http://www.ukcisa.org.uk/resources/23/International-student-services-in-colleges-and-universities-2010-11-self-audit-tool

van Lier, L. (2004). The ecology and semiotics of language learning: A sociocultural perspective . Amsterdam: Kluwer Academic Publishing.

Wallace, M. (1991). Training foreign language teachers: A reflective approach . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Walsh, S. (2011). Exploring classroom discourse: Language in action . Abingdon: Routledge.

Walsh, S. (2013). Classroom discourse and teacher development . Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Walsh, S., & O’Keeffe, A. (2009). Applying CA to a modes analysis of higher educa-tion spoken academic discourse. In H. Bowles & P. Seedhouse (Eds), Conversation analysis and LSP (pp. 101–140). Berlin: Peter Lang.

Ward, J. (2009). A basic engineering English word list for less proficient founda-tion engineering undergraduates. English for Specific Purposes , 28 (3), 170–182. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2009.04.001

Waters, J. L., & Leung, M. W. H. (2013). Emergent inequalities in transnational higher education: The case of British TNE in Hong Kong . Presentation at the Higher Education Academy seminar Furthering Equality in International Higher Education, University of Surrey, 29 January 2013. Retrieved from http://www.

200 References

heacademy.ac.uk/assets/documents/seminars/Themes_2012–2013/WSST02/Dr_Waters_Dr_Leung_presenation_WSST02.pdf

Watson Todd, R. (2003). EAP or TEAP? Journal of English for Academic Purposes , 2 (2), 147–156. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1475–1585(03)00014–6

Wharton, S. (2012). Epistemological and interpersonal stance in a data descrip-tion task: Findings from a discipline-specific learner corpus. English for Specific Purposes , 31 (4), 261–270. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2012.05.005

Wilson, K. (2008). Facilitator talk in EAP reading classes. ELT Journal , 62 (4), 366–374. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccm067

Wilson, K. (2009). Reading in the margins: EAP reading pedagogies and their critical, postcritical potential (Unpublished doctoral thesis). University of Technology, Sydney, Australia. Retrieved from http://epress.lib.uts.edu.au/research/handle/10453/20104

Wingate, U. (2011). A comparison of ‘additional’ and ‘embedded’ approaches to teaching writing in the disciplines. In M. Deane & P. O’Neill (Eds), Writing in the disciplines (pp. 65–87). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Wong, J., & Waring, H. Z. (2010). Conversation analysis and second language peda-gogy: A guide for ESL/EFL teachers . New York: Routledge.

Wright, E. (2012). EAP tutors’ perceptions of teaching and assessing ESAP and the training required for it at the University of Nottingham Ningbo China (Unpublished master’s dissertation). Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield Hallam, UK.

Xiao, Y. (2011). Book review. Academic discourse: English in a global context, Ken Hyland. Journal of English for Academic Purposes , 10 (3), 198–199. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2010.02.009

Yorke, M. (2013). Surveys of ‘the student experience’ and the politics of feed-back. In S. Merry, M. Price, D. Carless, & M. Taras (Eds), Reconceptualising feed-back in higher education: Developing dialogue with students (pp. 6–18). Abingdon: Routledge.

Yorke, M., & Vaughan, D. (2012). Deal or no deal? Expectations and experiences of first-year students in Art and Design. Retrieved from http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/assets/documents/disciplines/Art-Design/deal_or_no_deal.pdf

201

academic discourse, 13, 26, 36, 57–65, 69–70, 83–4, 94, 181

Academic Literacies, 8, 34–6, 40, 59, 60, 70

Academic Word List, 71academic writing, 34–9, 57–64, 69–71,

79–80accreditation of EAP courses, 114, 145,

146–8, 164Accreditation UK, 147action plan, 148–9, 169action research, 15–16, 21, 49, 67,

114, 143, 178argument essays, 64, 70, 79, 96assessment, 1, 31–2, 37–8, 66, 80–1,

90–1, 103–6, 107, 124–7, 131, 137, 161, 163–4, 167–8

assessment criteria, 32, 105, 124–5autoethnography, 118, 135awards for EAP dissertations, 10, 76,

142

BALEAP, 8, 10, 19, 77, 129, 160BALEAP Accreditation Scheme, 114,

145, 146–7, 164BASE, 61BAWE, 64beliefs of teachers, 58, 114–16, 123,

137bias, 17, 29blogs

for data collection and dissemination, 89, 117–19

and student writing, 41, 42, 76

Can Do, 82, 105case study, 16, 21, 101, 155, 173CEM model (Sloan & Porter), 47,

164–6CIC, 120classroom discourse, 119–20CLT, 115

coding, 76cohesion, 60Competency Framework, 59, 113, 114,

115, 147, 181concordances, 66, 76, 95constructive alignment, 25, 164, 166content analysis, 158conversation analysis, 60cooperative principle, 60corpora, 60–5, 71–2, 76, 81, 83, 94–5course design, 25, 35, 58, 65, 68–9, 87,

89, 178course evaluation, 88, 95, 108–10,

146–8, 161–5, 166–72course feedback, 154course objectives, 67, 88, 160course representative, 110, 154, 167CPD, 117–18crit (critique, in Architecture), 62, 66critical discourse analysis, 60critical reading skills, 95–8critical thinking, 95–8, 162criticality, 60, 97, 98curriculum, 26, 30, 33, 34, 36, 49–51,

68, 83–4, 118, 132, 147, 177

data analysis software, 17–18, 76, 95, 168, 170

data creation, 16, 176data making, 17, 176data, transcription of, 28–9, 119, 122datasets, 5Degrees of Proficiency, 155–6, 160DELNA, 90–1, 103desk research, 155diagnostic assessment, 45, 90–2, 103,

131diary/journal, 27, 66, 89, 96, 97–8,

100–1, 135–6, 141, 154digital immigrants, 42digital literacy, 39–43, 54, 75, 80digital natives, 39, 42

Index

202 Index

disciplinarity, 24–6, 36, 50–1, 62–4, 83–4, 97–8, 124–5, 138, 158, 162, 163

disclosure, 22, 44display questions, 96dissemination, 8, 10, 22, 46, 54, 130,

132, 152, 155, 169, 176–9, 183dissertation

to disseminate EAP research, 7, 10, 92, 116–19, 126, 142, 177, 178

student writing, 33, 89document analysis, 62, 80, 81, 89, 94,

155, 157, 172dramatised account, 94, 178

ecological validity, 98, 119EGAP, 6, 117elite interviews, 171emails, 42, 60, 76–8EMI, 12, 102, 107–8, 137, 180employability, 26, 32–3, 34, 68, 150English as a lingua franca in

academia, 14, 64English for Specific Purposes (journal),

5, 61EOP, 68ESAP, 6, 116–18ESP, 5, 57, 60, 104, 179–80Etherpad, 94ethics, 15–16, 22, 43, 90, 93, 97, 109,

114, 116, 140, 143, 170, 172, 177ethnography, 14, 16, 21–2, 41, 54, 67,

83, 84, 101, 103, 121, 155, 177, 178Evernote, 78expert informant, 67expository texts, 70, 72, 96–7

feedback (on student work), 30–2, 106–7, 124–7

field notes, 93–4, 140, 157focus groups, 44, 45, 52, 61, 62, 90,

98, 110, 112, 117, 135–6, 138, 140, 156–7, 164, 175

foreshadowed problem, 93

genre, 58, 60genre analysis, 62–4, 66genre pedagogy, 67–8, 70, 76–8, 81,

84, 178

hedging language, 61, 69hypothesis, 22

IELTS, 14, 103in-sessional, 5, 42, 45, 57, 65, 68,

78, 80, 83, 89, 99, 106–7, 124, 130, 131–2, 161, 164–6, 168–70

insider research, 20–3, 26, 35, 43, 53–4, 66, 68, 81, 84, 118, 135, 138, 153

institutional talk, 60interests and priorities in research, 2,

15, 84, 144, 166, 180internationalisation, 38, 43, 48–53,

149, 170–1inter-rater reliability in data analysis,

61, 76interview transcripts, see data,

transcription ofinterviews, 16, 28–9, 31, 32, 44, 52,

66, 76, 102, 109, 111, 112, 119, 124, 128, 137, 139, 154, 171

Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 5, 59

knowledge (declarative, functioning), 25

leadership in EAP, 133–4, 137, 142, 144, 160

league tables, 151, 173learning outcomes, 25, 80, 113, 165lectures, 36, 61, 81, 89, 109, 181

management data, 134management in EAP, 106, 116, 128,

133–4, 136, 159, 164materials development, 69–75, 80–3materials evaluation, 69–75, 78, 132metadiscourse, 79multimodal texts, 16, 37, 41

narrative frames, 135–6narrative inquiry, 16, 101National Student Survey, 30, 38,

150–4needs analysis, 57–64, 86–92

Index 203

observationas research method, 16, 88, 92–4,

139–40, 156of teaching, 127–31, 147, 160

occluded genres, 62one-to-one support, 46, 97–8, 161

participatory appraisal methodology, 87–9

peer reviewstudents, 79, 96, 106tutors, 163

policy, 3, 7, 12, 20, 48–50, 146, 156, 160, 164, 166–7

politeness (linguistic), 60, 77, 158portfolio, 31, 66, 106–7, 125–7, 131,

175positionality of researcher, 2, 3, 8, 22,

43, 54, 100, 116, 137, 182post-observation conference, 127–30pragmatics, 60, 77pre-sessional, 5, 57, 83, 97, 99–101,

104–6, 108–10, 114, 128–31, 134, 147, 164, 167

professional services, 11, 43–7, 53, 134, 149, 154

qualitative research, 9, 16–18, 22, 44, 74, 83, 87, 92, 101, 117, 119, 140, 162, 172–3, 176, 178

quality in higher education, 38, 48, 52, 74, 78, 95, 107–10, 114, 145–61, 180

quality of EAP provision, 161–74questionnaire, 16, 28, 79, 87, 88, 89,

99, 107, 115–17, 137–8, 150, 154, 155, 167, 172

reading reaction journals, 96referential questions, 96, 121reflective essays, 27–8reflexivity in research, 9, 17, 21, 54,

100, 115, 123, 126–7, 137–42, 143, 161, 170, 171, 175–83

register (academic), 14, 59, 71reliability, 61, 76, 172research ethics committee, 93research questions, 9, 21, 23, 54, 103,

111, 140, 177, 180–1

researcher development, 8–10, 181–3resource allocation, 142–5ResTES, 8, 19Review of Educational Oversight, 145,

147–9

sampling (in research), 33, 39, 108, 171

self-report data, 28, 39, 90, 99self-study resource, 52seminars (for students), 82, 122, 133SETT, 120Snapshots of EAP Research Journeys, 9social constructivist approach, 7social English, 101social networking, 40, 76social networks (Montgomery), 101social practice approach, 22, 23, 166speech act theory, 60staff development, 114, 116, 120, 127,

131–2, 134–6, 156, 162, 180statistics, 9, 18, 30, 71, 151, 161, 168stimulated recall, 120, 137, 140student mobility, 12, 13, 48, 51, 180student satisfaction surveys, 150–5,

162, 164, 167–8study abroad, 98–102, 177surveys, 30, 39, 42, 44–6, 50, 54, 87,

140sustainability of EAP provision, 12syllabus, 68–9, 84, 106, 129, 131Systemic Functional Linguistics,

59–60, 62

tacit knowledge, 21, 29–30, 34, 127, 128

teacher talk, 119–22technology, 39–43, 75–80Tell us about it!, 153–4tests, 45, 91, 103–4text messaging, 41textbooks, 14, 69–74, 139–40thematic analysis, 9, 109, 168thematic development, 60thesis, 33, 176thick description, 93–4think aloud, 137, 140, 141transfer of knowledge, 27, 32, 40, 80,

82

204 Index

transferability of research findings, 84, 131

transnational education, 13, 48tutorials, 89, 97–8, 162, 168Twitter, 76, 89–90

validity, 2, 7, 10, 18, 26, 77, 84, 98, 103–6, 119, 123, 138, 146, 156, 161, 166, 172, 179

Vitae, 181vocabulary, 61, 71–2, 81, 83, 92–5, 116

wants, 87, 88, 93web, 40, 42, 78wikis, 41, 42, 76, 78, 79workplace communication, 33, 64,

73, 82Writing in the Disciplines, 36–7