report atthekorbl. if. r. ,perak
TRANSCRIPT
I I
I I
F~'
-. J
I I
ITTO PROJECT: FD 1/5/90REV. Iru)
F\
r~',
REPORT
SOILSAND SOILPROPERTIES
.-,
LJ
ATTHEKORBl. IF. R. ,PERAK
On
APPENDIXl
I ^
SHAMSl. TDDINJUSOP
AJIkylAD HIJSNI MOHD HANIF
I, _.
I I
-
Department of SoilscieneFaculty of Agriculture
11niversitiPutra Malaysia43400 Serdang, Selamgor
Malaysia
1997
r'
I'I I
^
CONTENTS
Introduction
I,
The Project Area
Soil Sampling
Soil Type and Soil Properties
Fertility Status
Recommendation
Acknowledgements
Appendix
~ I
I,
2:1g^
I ^
3
3
L,
6
I,
I__
8
10
12
I ^
14
15
,-
I
,- ,
I
r-
I
r'
,.
A proposal was submitted to tlie International Tropical Timber Organization
(ITTO) to fund a project entitled Rehabilitation of Natural Forests, Korbu, F. R. , Perak.
The project was approved, and work started in 1993 under the supervision of Forestry
Department Peninsular Malaysia. A team of consultant from UpM was appointed to
implement and monitor the project. The project area is compartment 181, within the
Korbu Forest Reserve (Fig. I).
L_
I '
Introduction
I^
been encroached by shifting cultivators.
Part of the compartment 181 is logged-over forest, while some other areas have
considered as degraded natural forest. The aim of tlie project is to develop silvicultural
systems for rehabilitation of the degraded forest based o11 field studies. Data on soils and
soil properties would be useful for the successful implementation of the project.
I *I,
,
L ,'
Tliis report summarises soil characteristics ill the project area with a view of
evaluating their fertility in relation to the growth of forest species. Methodology of soil
sampling is fully described in tliis report.
At tliis point in time, the entire area is
Tile study area is in compartment 181, Korbu Forest Reserve, located about 50
kiri south-west of Kuala Kangsar, Perak. Plate I gives a pictorial account of the forest
species in tile area. The site is o11 the western foothills of the Main Raring, situated at
Project Area
3
r~~~'-- r~~~ , -,^
,--
N
,-- ,--..--
4:~
750
-^.
Figure I. Compartment 181, Korbu F. R: the study area
*
500
\*
I
\
. I
,\*
,
,--^
I
\
. I
.It. ",
\
I.,.
,*.L\\
* .
\
I,
,.-- ,
**...,..
\ ,
:.::\\,\
7<,' ',,, \
. : ~
.^--^-.
I
~::..\\ \.
\
.\,\\*
,--^
\
\
\
.\
\ \:\\\
\\. \
.\.*
\
Key :
\
\
\~.~\\ ,, ..\~..~\\ ,, ..\
~.~ ,.~~~ ~\ ,- -~.. , ,.\
- -,. .....,\,. ,. ....
~" If ...*' ~"''~'<.'J I, ',.- I
1' I .~'. , , ,,I~~~' + ,.,*..",' I' ,' ,
\.\\ .,-. ,F~.~,11 ,', '.' A ' ~_I
~~ I ,.' f'
". I, '\r, I ,,._.,',.. \, I I ." ---.., ~~--".
11 \\.. ::.~.
~,, ,,~ ...
."... \
.,.~-*.,,.** :. 750-.~.-> ~, \ ..\ \.
~"'~'~ " ," 0 400, -.,_.. I ,
O ~~~~~!14, '
: O I
' I
^.,
^ ^^~
. .
* *,,\ . ~
.. ,F' ~
Contour LLne
(in feet)
, -.
**
\
.\
River
\
*,\\
11
..
---.
.
\
, * ..\
\..
..
..
^^-.
-^~
! '\'
,
:
---
Road
500
SCA I Lop Boundry
1000
.. .. .... \~,,
..
~\\.\
,
Meters
,I.
,
,
I'
, -.:
f ~~:
an elevation of 150 - 300 in a. s. I. The general terrain of the area is considered
undulating to hilly, having an average slope of > 25% in some part of the area (Plate
2).
,-.
.^
I~
I '
I__
I-
Ll
.
- ". r*h
4
,,
The climate of the area is characterized by rainfall of high intensity and long
duration. The annual rainfallis more than 2000 min. There is a distinct dry period from
February to June. The average temperature is 27'C. Past record suggests that the soils
are highly 16ached, resulting in low nutrient contents and, therefore, of low fertility.
Thus, rehabilitation of the degraded forest can be difficult and costly.
Plate I.
A
L.
LI
:
A photograph showing luxuriant tropicalforest, within the Korbu Forest Reserve.
5
,--.
I~'
The study area is bordered by a land development scheme, whicli nave been
allocated to deserving settlers. Tile land in the scheme 11as been properly terraced for
planting rubber (Plate 3). Soil erosion is a major limitation for crop growtli as the slope
Is steep and the land is subjected to rainfall of higli intensity
I~'
I_
I
Two types of sampling were carried out: I) to get soil samples for determination
of soil series; and 2) to get samples for evaluating fertility status
Soil Sampling and Analysis
the dominant rock types were examined and identified at suitable stops, The area is
characterized by two major rock types, namely granite and shale. Sites for digging soil
pits for profile description were carefully chooseii to get representative samples. Based
on dominant rock type distribution, a profile was described in 11/6 soil developed from
granite and three profiles were described in the soils developed from shale (two on
normal shale and another o11 ferrugenous SIIale)
Soil Profile: The study area was traversed by a 4-wheel vehicle (Fig. I) where
I_
L
of officers from the Forestry Department Peninsular Malaysia
collected from the various experimental plots mine project area
Soils for Fertilit These soils were sampled by workers under strict supervisioi\
The samples were
6
I'
I~ ~
.
r~'
,*?' .. .4e. *=;, ..*,.%?,. 5 .,..,! ,,, ._.,>
. . ,,.= , ~ , ... .=,:......,. .,.-, e:,--../-. ., *.,-. ,-, . ,'~ ~ ' ,,.,"'4*' *. ..-*--. ...,<,*.',
<9;. ,SI'!^;_ , ,* - r- " "'' '^.,;*,$$;.*,*-,?.. t, s*:;"*', I
Plate 2.
.
r
I.
,
A^. I41
~...
A photograph showing steep terrain and roadcutting, exposing shale undergoing weathering.
* ~
' !f, ,:,. t!*"
.@ .;,^,? ,.,~,
.,
.*
..
^^
I
^
$1;*Pi
..
Plate 3.
.
*
A photograph showing properly terracedland ready for rubber cultivation.
7
I
-,"
V
^
^
-\
I
\
I
Tile soils were brought back to the Department of Soil Science, Universiti Putra
Malaysia for analysis. Soil analyses for the soil profiles carried out include pH, basic
eXchangeable cations, eXchangeable A1, nitrogen, organic carbon, phosphorus, texture and
cation-eXchange capacity (NH, OAc). The data so obtained were used for determination
of soil series and soil fertility evaluation. Additional analyses for experimental plot
samples were carried out. The analyses were for determination of micronutrients (Fe,
Mn, Zn, Cu).
This section deals witli profile description and soil properties on site. The data
only represent properties of the soils in the profile and in the area close by.
Soil Type and Soil Properties (Appendix I)
fairly fiat topography (4-5% slope). The soil, developed from granite, is well-drained.
It is characterized by reddish brown sandy clay loam topsoil changing to clay at depth
below 91 cm. Soil structures are moderate, medium, subangular blocky and thin, patchy
Pedon I: PI SCA/D
cutans are present in the subsoil. The soil call be classified as an Ultisol. It is called Bt
Terniang Series according to the Malaysian Soil Classification System.
This profile is situated in the shifting cultivation area on
eXchangeable basic cations are low, untypical for soils under forest cover. Available P
pH (HD) is 5.45 in the topsoil, decreasing to 4.54 ill the B23t
is low and so are N and organic carbon. EXchangeable Alls low ill the topsoil, but the
value is moderately 11igli at depth. The CEC 11as a value typical for a soil under strongly
16achiiig environments.
8
In general,
.
.
.
I I
.
I
I IL,
II I
,
slope. The area is also under shifting cultivation. Tile soil, developed froin shale, is
well-drained. Patchy clay coatings are present o11 ped faces whicliineetthe requirement
of all argillic norizon. It is characterized by dark yellowisli brown, clay soil, witli
moderate, medium, subangular blocky structures tliroughout tlie profile. The soil is
classified as all Ultisol, and under the Malaysiaii Soil Classification System it is called
Bungor Series.
Pedoii 2: P2 SCA/A Tliis soil is situated on a nilly terrain, having 30 - 40%
The soilis acidic in reaction, naving pH(H, 0) of less than 5 in the topsoil, This
Is consistent witli the Inoderately 111gli eXchangeable A1 in that horizon. EXchangeable
Ca, Mg and K are moderately higli ill the topsoil, but low in the subsoil. Nitrogen is
moderately high, but organic carbon and available P are very low for soil under forest
cover
I I
^L
area is very hilly, with an average slope of 100%. The drainage condition is good. The
soil, whicli is characterized by the presence of argillic horizon, is developed on shale
The colour of the topsoilis yellowisli brown, changing to red at depth. The topsoilis
sandy clay, overly ing clay loam. The soil, whicli is named as 16rain Series, is also an.
'I
Pedoii3: P3 LOF
Ultisol.
The soil profile is situated in the logged-over forest. The
The pH of this soilis very low, naving values less than 4.5. This is due 10 11/6
presence of 11igli eXchangeable A1 ill the soil. The eXchangeable Ca and Mg are very
low, and so are organic carbon and available P
9
\
Catioii-exchanoe ca acit
nutrients against removal by crops, erosion or 16achiiig. It is affected by organic matter
content in the soil. The CEC across blocks is Inediuin to moderately low to medium,
ranging from 5.9 to 13.5 cmol (+)/kg soil. This is typical of logged-over forest soil as
opposed to cropped soil whicliis moderately low to low in rating. Minimal variation in
F1
I ,-
CEC
CEC exists between blocks.
J
CEC is a measure of tile capacity of a soil to retain
Macro-elements
Mucli of the total N is not available to the plant and only gives some idea of the nitrogen
that the plant can use. The InGall N value across blocks is about 0.2% whicli is rated as
medium. Cropped soils usually has < 0.2% total N. Total N and % C are related; the
NP K CaandM
higher the % C the better the soil will be in term of available N and soil structure.
Variation in % N and % C is minimal, althougli 4 plots nave extremely low value of <
The % C in the soils is very low as compared to undisturbed forest soil.
Total N was measured by the kjeldahl method.
0.6 % C.
The available P ranges from very low to moderately low. Samples from block
B (Nos. 8, 11 & 12) contain very low available P. The soils are deficient in P and
responds in varying degrees to P fertilizer
because of the presence of moderate to 11igli Fe content; Fe forIn a Fe-P fixation
complex. The available Ca and Mg contents are moderately 11igli. The requirement for
calciuin fertilizer is 1101 common for forest species. As some forest species (leguines) are
sensitive to low pH, addition of ground do loinatic limestone (GML) 1101 only increase the
soil pH but correct the Ca and Mg deficiency 10 a certain extent
I_
Another reason for P being deficient is
11
Micro-elements Fe Mii Zn and Cu
forest species planted o11 acid soil. The analysis showed that the soils nave adequate Fe
and Mn. Most of the soils in the blocks nave low to 1116diuiii amount of Cu and Zii
Increasing tlie soil test value of available Cu and Zii to about 5 Itg/g is considered
adequate for forest species.
I
J
Application of Fe and Mii is not required for
The overall soil fertility status in the project area is low. Nutrients call be
supplemented 10 alleviate the soil fertility, thereby increasing the yield and to protect the
trees against stress, pest and diseases.
There are 3 main types of tree species that are planted viz. fruit tree (durian),
legume and lion-legume. The fertilizer guide are listed according to the above
classification and given in tables below:
Reconunendatio"
Fruit tree (Durian) for fruits and timber.
Incorporate 100 g organic fertilizer: 6 (% N): 15(%PPP : 3(%K, 0): I(% MgO)
+ TB (trace elements) willI topsoil to fill up the 0,125 In' planting 1101e.
12
I,
Time of A
1st year
Iication
6tli moiltli
2nd year
T e of FertilizeI
12th moritli
and Rate
6th moritli
200 g of 8:4:4:23(%CaO) + TB
Itree
3rd year
12tli month
,,
4tli year and above repeat as for the 3rd year with addition of 500 0 of PR ill alternateyear.
f'
200 g of phosphate )rock (PR) + 200 g )12:12:17:2+TE
6tli montli
Metliod
' I
I__.
12tli month
2
Ring apply evenly about20 cm froin plant base
11
300 g of PR + 500 g)of 12:12:17:2+TB )
Non-legume for timber
About 40 cm from
plant base
11
Incorporate 50 g of GML (ground magnesium limestone) + 100 g of PR at
planting
Time of A
About 80 cm from
plant base
1st year
Iication
1st month
6th month
12tli month
2nd year
T e of Fertilizer
and Rate
3rd year and above
6tli moritli
12th Inonth
100 g of 15:15:6:4
Itree
11
I,
200 g of 15:15:6:4
Method
11
500 g of 15:7:18:2
Ring apply evenly about20 cm from base
Ring apply about 40 cmfrom base
13
Ring apply about 8() cmI'Tom base
I~~3
,.
Legume for timber
I'I
I~
Incorporate 100 g of GML and 100 g of PR at planting
Time of A
I'
-,
I I
I ~
1st year
Iication
I
2nd year
1st montli
6tli Inontli
12tli month
T e of FertilizeI
and Rate
3rd year and above
6tli moritli
12tli Inontli
100 g of 15:15:6:4
Itree
,I
I
(Fertilizers are best applied at the onset of the rainy season)
11
200 g of 0:15:6:4
Once a tightly coupled nutrient cycling system is established (5 10 years)
minimal or no fertilization is required for the legume and non-legume species
I_
J
Method
11
400 g of 0:14:17:2
As ill2
As ill2
We like to record our appreciation and gratitude to Universiti Putra Malaysia,
International Tropical Timber Organization, Forestry Department Peninsular Malaysia,
Assoc. Prof. Mohd. Basri Hamzah, Assoc. prof. Ashari Muklitar and Y. B. Dato' Hj
Mohd. Darus bill Hj. Mallmud for financial and Ieclinical support
I_
As in 2
Acknowledgements
14
I~
f
Podon
Series
ClassificationLand use
SlopeDrainageParent material
Diagnostic horizonLocation
Described byExperimentDate
I~
I'
I.
A^I
PI(SCA/D)Bt TerniangUltisol
Shifting cultivationundulating, 4-5% slopewell-drained
graniteargillicInO project, Korbu, PerakShamshuddin, HUSniRehabilitation of natural forest
August 29, 1996
r
I '
I *
\
A1
I. _.
O - 18
B2jj 18 - 43
Ban
Reddish brown (10YR 514); sandy clay loam; moderate, medium,subangular blocky; friable; many, medium-coarse roots; clear, smooth.
Reddish brown (10YR 4/6); sandy loam; weak, medium, subangularblocky; thin, patchy clay coatings on ped faces; friable; many medium-fine roots; diffuse, smooth.
Yellowish red (10YR 4/6); sandy clay; moderate, medium, subangularblocky; thin, patchy clay coatings on ped faces; friable; few, mediumroots; diffuse, smooth.
Reddish brown (2.5YR 4/6); clay; moderate, medium, subangular blocky;thin, patchy clay coatings on ped faces; friable; few, fine roots.
Profile Descri tion
43 - 91
B23j 91+
L
15
r'~~'
., r ~ I~~ --
Depth
(cm)
,-.-~ r
Horizon
,--^
O-18
14-83
43-91
91+-.
O\
pH
HzO KCl
-^-~
A1
B21t
B22t
B23t
,^ ,^--.
Basic cations (NH, OAc)
Ca Mg K
5.45
5.09
4.72
4.54
Chemical Analysis for Fedon PI
4.10
400
3.65
3.75
<
,^-.
14
250
63
15
~~I
35
25
35
15
14g/g
Na
A1
(KCl)
67
58
48
55
~~I
CEC (NH, OAc)
8
9
8
9
'~'I
>
5
24
121
202
<--- cmol(+)/kg --->
'I
N
4.5
3 .5
5.4
6.7
--.
O. C
<....-.. Vo -.---=>
0.13
0.08
0.10
0.10
P (Ag/g)
0.80
0.80
0.40
0.30
4
traces
traces
r~
'~I
r
I~'
--,
,
Pedon
Series
ClassificationLand use
SlopeDrainageParent material
Diagnostic horizonLocation
Described byExperimentDate
I
P2 (SCA/A)BungorUltisol
Shifting cultivationhilly, 30 - 40% slopewell-drained
SIIale
argillicITTO project, Korbu, PerakShallIshuddin, HUSniRehabilitation of natural forest
August 29, 1996
I
A1
I '
O- 10
B2jj
L_
10 - 50
B22t
Dark yellowish brown (10YR 4/6); clay; Inoderate, Inedium, subangularblocky; friable; few 11/6diuiii roots; clear. sinootli
Yellowisli brown (10YR 516); clay; moderate, medium, subangularblocky; tliin, paidiy clay coatings o11 ped faces; friable; common, fineroots; diffuse, smooth.
Yellowisli browii (10YR 514); clay; moderate, medium, subangularblocky; 11/1n, pareliy clay coalings o11 ped faces: friable; few, Inediumroots; diffuse, sinooth.
Dark yellowisli browii(10YR 4/6); clay; moderate, Inedium, subangular;thin, patcliy clay coatings o11 ped faces: I'riable; few, medium roots;presence of rerinite activities.
PI'onIe Descri tion
50 - 100
B23t 100+
L,
17
I r~~ IT' r'~.
r~~~' r~'.L
Depth
(cm)
Horizon
,^-^-.
L_
O-10
10-50
50-100
100+F~
co
pH
HzO KCl
A1
B21t
B22t
B23t
F~~- r~~.
Basic cations (NH, OAc)
Ca Mg K
4.74
4.63
4.5 I
5.05
Chemical Analysis for Fedon P2
--.
3.61
3.67
3.60
3.81
<
157
71
31
54
,-- .
105
70
25
20
14g/g
Na
I_
A1
(KCl)
103
106
78
77
--^
CEC (NH, OAc)
_ _I
11
9
8
7
----..^
>
--- ~
108
197
247
17
<--- cmol(+)/kg --->
.-^...^-,
N
9. I
9.8
9.3
10.9
O. C
<---...- 9, "0 --...->
0.18
0.16
0.13
0.16
P ("g/g)
030
0.01
0.01
0.04
3 .3
traces
traces
O. I
-,
I
-J
Podon
Series
Classification
Land use
SlopeDrainageParent material
Diagnostic horizonLocation
Described byExperimentDate
P3 (LOF)16raiii
Ultisol
logged-over foresthilly, 100% slopewell-drained
SIIale
argillicITTO project, Korbu, PerakShamshuddin, HUSniRehabilitation of natural forest
Auousi 29, 1996
I~
A1 O - 8
B2jt
,-
8 - 40
B22t
L_,
Yellowish brown (10YR 518); sandy clay; 1110derate, 11/6dium, subangularblocky; t'riable; few. tille roots.
Reddisli yellow (5YR 618): clay loam; moderate, Inedium, subangularblocky; 1/11n, patchy clay coatings o11 ped faces; friable; few, mediumroots; diffuse, sinootli
Reddisli yellow (5YR 616); sandy clay; weak, 1116dium, subangular blocky:thin, patcliy clay coatings on ped faces: friable; few, coarse roots; clear,smooth
Red (5YR 518); sandy clay: weak, medium, subangular blocky; thin,patchy clay coalings o11 ped faces; common, quartz gravels; friable; noroots
40 - 95
PI'ome Descri tion
B23j 95+
L
19
r~' I'~ I"~ r~~ ^^
Depth
(cm)
,^-^-
I _
Horizon
r~-\ - .
O-8
8-40
40-95
95+IQo
pH
H20 KCl
I~~~'
A1
B21t
B22t
B23t
f'~~"'L_ _ __.
4.32
4.12
4.10
4.10
Basic cations (NH, OAc)
Ca Mg K
Chemical Analysis for Fedon P3
,^,
3.05
4.27
3.06
3.17
<
14
2
6
2
,-^
26
4
3
2
ICg/g
Na
--^
A1
(KCl)
61
49
36
30
~'~"I
CEC (NH, OAc)
7
6
6
5
--.
>
244
140
201
216
<--- cmol(+)/kg --->
'~~I -.
N
14.3
15.3
15.5
16.4
.-^
O. C
<------- 9. "0 ------>
0.15
0.11
0.12
0.09
P (/"g/g)
0.80
0.30
0.20
0.70
7
0.8
traces
traces
I
^^
.
L
J
.
Pedon
Series
ClassificationLand use
SlopeDrainageParent material
Diagnostic norizonLocation
Described byExperimentDate
P4 (LOF)Chat
Ultisol
logged-over foresthilly, 100% slopewell-drained
forrugenous shaleargillicITTO project, Korbu, PerakSIIainshuddin, HUSniRehabilitation of natural forest
August 29, 1996
A1 O- 18
B2 , 18 - 50
B22i
Strong brown (7.5YR 516); clay; weak, 11/6dium, subangular blocky;friable; many, fine roots: clear, smooth
Yellowisli red (5YR 518); clay; weak, 11/6dium, subaiigular blocky; thin,patchy clay coatings on ped faces; friable; many, fine-mediuin roots;diffuse, sinootli
Strong brown (7.5YR 518); clay: weak, medium, subangular blocky; thin,patchy clay coalings o11 ped faces; friable; Inaiiy, fine-medium roots;diffuse, smooth
Yellowisli red (5YR 518); clay; weak, medium, subangular blocky; thin.patchy clay coatings o11 ped faces; t'riable; 110 roots; clear, smooth.
Red (2.5YR 4/8): gravelly clay; weak, medium, subangular blocky; thin,patchy clay coatings o11 ped faces; friable: Inaiiy, quartz gravels; no roots
50 - 90
Profile Desci. i tion
B23j 90 - 140
B24t 140+
21
,^--. r~~~ r
Depth
(cm)
r~'~~ I _ .
Horizon
^--..
O-18
18-50
50-90
90-140
140+I\,IQ
pH
H20 KCl
r'-
A1
B21t
B22t
B23t
B24+
-- .
4.26
4.39
4.31
4.50
491
Basic cations (NH, OAc)
Ca Mg K
--- .
Chemical Analysis for Fedon P4
,~^~*
3.35
3.65
3.63
3.90
4.02
<
r~~'\
7
7
6
8
4
,^-.
. ------,
6
5
4
4
ICg/g
Na
-^
A1
(KCl)
50
49
19
20
16
-^\
CEC (NH, OAc)
8
9
9
12
9
>
.-^.^
254
249
212
197
145
<--- cmol(+)/kg --->
^-\
- ,
.^.^
N
10.5
8.6
7.8
7.6
5 . I
O. C
<--...-- Vo ------>
,
009
0.22
0.11
0.10
0.09
P (^g/g)
060
0.90
0.75
0.59
0.49
5
traces
O. I
traces
traces
F"'~~'
.----,
r" ---
.
r~~ r'~
^P2B2t, 019
IP3B2t, o19IP4B2t, 019
Researcher: DR. AHMAD HUSNl
Analysis by: ARIFFINPrepared By: hanifSample:Date:
Sample
I~".
'~~~~'~~~ ~~~ ~~~~~~~'~~~~ ~'~Particlesizedistributionmicron^)~~~~~ ~'~ ~ ~~~~~~t~~~~'~~~Total microns _! !clay sill I, eryfi"esand finesand med"in, ""d c, arsesandl~ "I'day Sill Sand~~~; SoilTextureClass* I0-2 ^ 2-20 20-50150-100 100-250 250,500 >500 'Tota1' <2 2.50 >50 UsDA ^
, ~{3.49 ~~~I 8:4^~~' ~ ~glib~ "~4:6:23~ 1:0i~~~ Td:81~ ' Ton4~~'~9'91^~ I 13.49' ~~18.19~~~~^8.25 I sandyioam^ 36.70 27.49 8.01 17.73 0.09 4.27 15.64 99.93 36.70 35.50 27.73 ^ clayloam
51.34 I 7.61 9.33 23.18 0.45 476 330 9997/5/34 16.94 31.69 clay I
I\>LAi
*************
.,^..-\\-- -,
Soil Physics LaboratorySoil Science Department
UNIVERSITI PERTANIAN MALAYSIA
,^^-~
.- J
.-^
- - - ----.
-.---~ ,--^\
---.,.^.-^\ .^
r'~- r'~.
r'~~~L
To:
r~
Attn:
r
Referenceour your
I BLOCKA I
2
r~~~.
IQJ:~
3
4
f'\
Water
\-
SOIL SCIENCEDEPARTMENT
(SOIL FERTILITYand REMEDIATION SECTION)
5
2
pH
4.88
6
3
,.-
4.53
.-
IN KCL
7
4
4.58
APPENDTX TT
J
4.21
8
5
r~~'.
meq/100g
4.65
I_ _
402
9
6
CEC
4.50
406
10
7
,--.-~
4.42
9.4
4.13
11
8
RESULT OF SOIL ANALYSIS
440
6.6
4.14
%
12
9
4.53
8.5
4.03
N
13 BLOCKB I
10
4.60
0.20
6.5
401
11
,--^
5.03
0.31
8.7
4.05
12
P
4. 86
0.31
8.0
4.12
6.55
* - not deterTwine, not enough sample
,
.^
- -.
4.59
0.18
5.9
4.24
3.53
K
0.34
4.62
8.5
4/7
5.50
1/9
,--^____I
0.18
8. I
550
406
54
0.22
Ca
106
5.89
4.10
72
234
^-^-\
0.21
9.3
4.88
-J
74
1/8
0.17
*
4.03
Mg
55
84
0.18
88
9.5
3.95
54
150
ug/g
A1
0.22
90
3 .76
Sample Received:Sample Type: SoilAnalisis:
64
204
68
"I
0.21
314
108.2
66
4/8
86
017
re
289.1
4.88
103
132
78
-^.--\
.
183.9
6.16
844
74
110
52
224.8
Mn
3.95
894
90
238
46
222.6
813
16
*
498
56
238.2
1092
19
74
Zn
674
100
298.0
782
25
*
3
142
2166
512
23
178
Cu
4
134
232.7
905
14
2
*
192. I
585
12
3
%C
2
58
141.6
604
18
2
0.84
170.6
726
15
2
0.28
228.2
677
31
4
2
0.97
640
53
3
1.30
689
44
4
3
1.59
22
9
2
1.39
10
3
3
1.17
9
5
1.22
2
5
1.98
4
1.32
3
1.32
1.51
1.45
.
r" I~"~ ,^^~
To:
,^
- ^ ---.
Attn:
Referenceour your
I~~'~~
14 BLOCKB 2
,-----.
15
IQco
16
,-^\
17
Water
SOIL SCIENCEDEPARTMENT
(SOIL FERTILITYand REMEDIATION SECTION)
18
3
pH
,
5.04
19
4
4.49
IN KCL
20
5
4.44
4.36
21
6
I'.
meq/100g
4.65
4.03
22
7
CEC
4.30
401
23
8
4.65
9.5
408
9
24
RESULTOF SOIL ANALYSIS
4. 86
8.7
3.96
25 BLOCKC I
%
10
,--^\
4.50
4.02
8.5
N
26
11
477
4.12
0.15
8.9
12
,^\
4.45
0.21
3.98
8.2
P
446
*
018
4.07
7.56
* - riot deternune, not enough sample
2
,-^-\
4.45
0.21
10
398
3.57
K
0.15
8.7
5.00
3.97
3.99
79
-^-\_I
0.27
8 . 8
3.98
605
70
0.18
13.5
Ca
4.18
5.50
69
.-^\
162
0.18
8.0
461
56
122
0.18
9.7
2.44
Mg
55
,.-.^.^.\
100
030
8.6
66
3.41
*
242
I
0.17
A1
56
4.61
Sample Received:Sample Type: SoilAnalisis:
67
70
'~"~'I
0.18
58
2.83
82.2
55
*
0.15
90
2.83
Fe
341.1
100
338
-.^.-.
36
5.16
333.7
638
76
190
*
215.1
6.01
Mn
906
62
3 16
92
430.3
692
10
49
172
72
387.2
867
30
58
292
Zn
86
238.2
914
14
146
2
50
329.2
741
14
328
Cu
2
54
141.6
698
7
3
62
416.9
772
35
2
3
%C
1/6
3 12.9
107 I
39
2
5
283.2
693
1.21
12
3
3
091
112.6
762
50
8
2
145
792
6
2
2
0.56
10/4
15
4
4
1.54
7
2
3
1.54
42
4
3
1.45
2
2
1.63
2
5
1.73
1.70
1.90
1.42
*
r-^~~.
.---i--- , .
\
I ___
To:
I~~T
Attn:
I'\
Referenceour your
,^~
27
,-- \
28
I\,o
29
,^\
30
3
----..
Water
SOIL SCIENCEDEPARTMENT(SOIL ERRTIUTYand REMEDIATIONSECTION)
31
4
pH
,-----~
32
5
----.
458
IN KCL
33
6
462
34
,^---\
7
449
meq/100g
401
35
8
4.06
CEC
4.05
36
--^-\
9
4.60
3.97
37 BLOCKD I
10
-,
RESULT OFSOIL ANALYSIS
4.46
7.9
3.78
38
,^^-
11
%
4.96
4.01
110
39
N
12
4.46
4.09
11.5
,^\
460
0.20
4.25
*
2
- - ,
P
4.70
0.14
7. 8
3.98
* - riot deterimne, not enough sample
3
,---.-\
5.10
0.24
4.02
8.5
5.12
5.00
0.20
4.05
K
6. 8
531
,^-~
6.9
024
4.26
6.55
52
NO SAMPLE
8 . I
0.39
421
4.61
Ca
.-^\
34
74
014
4.96
54
102
0.20
8.5
8.72
Mg
,-^._ I
*
106
0.14
6. 8
17.83
49
80
0.18
ug/g
30
A1
8.49
Sample Received:Sample Type: SoilAnalisis:
.-^\
58
*
0.18
6.12
36
101
192
0.15
30
450
232.2
Fe
64
^-^
124
5.39
*
167.6
61
220
56
372.3
10.58
Am
982
57
252
40
473.3
968
59
266
64
445. I
1060
22
67
174
Zn
84
3 12.9
637
33
240
102
120. I
940
11
332
3
80
Cu
144.6
653
2
2
86
315.9
550
34
2
96
2
131.9
%C
991
7
94. I
1035
22
2
73.3
669
1.71
13
468
145
12
2
2.00
354
72
1.75
87
0.41
59
2
1.91
2
1.68
2
2
0.33
1.59
2
*
1.01
1.58
r-
,
r~~. i~~T I~~~
I
To:
r~~'
Altn:
r' I'~
our
40
I"
I\>\I
your
.-^
4
SOIL SCIENCEDEPARTME(SOIL FERTILITY EDIATION SECTION)
,^-.
534
45
L_
46
,-^-.
47
4.31
48
9
.----.-\
,
10
437
6.9
11
4.54
,-.-.
RESULTOF SOIL ANALYSIS
12
4.46
432
4.00
I~^-.
021
4.10
* - not determine
4.04
~--^-\
6.71
K
9.0
not enough sample
,-.^~.
Ca
2
0.23
---.I
IVlg
85
62
5.78
""~I
A1
72
110
Sample Received:Sample Type: SoilAnalisis:
47
90
---.
Fe
120
48
80
32
Mn
52
309.9
32
3 14.4
240.4
Zn
757
266.8
807
582
Cu
13
768
7
8
%C
4
5
2
2
I . 6
1.32
205
I ,--- ,-~-~ ,--^ I~~~\ ,~--~ ,---- -~'~* ,--.- I----\