resettlement action plan (rap) for ayer-kamdini...
TRANSCRIPT
RURAL ELECTRIFICATION AGENCY
Resettlement Action Plan (RAP) for Ayer-Kamdini-Minakulu-
Bobi and Environs in Northern Uganda (75
km)Final Report
RESCO PROPERTY CONSULTANT SURVEYORS11/12/2010
RP1490 V4
ii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
GLOSSARY OF TERMS............................................................................................................................. VI
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY..........................................................................................................................VIII
1. INTRODUCTION.........................................................................................................................................11.1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION..........................................................................................................................11.2. THE AIM OF THE RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN..............................................................................21.3. OBJECTIVES OF THE RAP.....................................................................................................................2
1.3.1. Approach and Methodology..............................................................................................21.3.1.2.Census...........................................................................................................................................31.3.1.7.Inventory of lost and affected Assets.........................................................................41.3.1.8.Socio-economic Surveys and Studies..........................................................................51.3.2. Analysis of Surveys and Studies....................................................................................7
2. PROJECT IMPACTS AND AFFECTED PERSONS.......................................................................9
2.1. PROJECT AFFECTED PERSONS.............................................................................................................92.2. SOCIO-ECONOMIC BASELINE OF PAPS.............................................................................................9
2.2.1. Age and Gender.......................................................................................................................92.2.2. Educational Attainment.....................................................................................................102.2.3. Ethnicity.....................................................................................................................................112.2.4. Livelihoods and Employment.........................................................................................112.2.5. Ownership and Particulars of the affected Person............................................112.2.6. Burial Sites................................................................................................................................132.2.7. Income Sources......................................................................................................................132.2.8. General Information about Children..........................................................................142.2.9. Impaired Persons..................................................................................................................152.2.10. Production Systems.............................................................................................................172.2.11. Social Network and Support System.........................................................................19
3. LEGAL FRAMEWORK FOR LAND ACQUISITION AND COMPENSATION.......................20
3.1. RELEVANT NATIONAL LAWS....................................................................................................................203.2. OTHER LAWS...........................................................................................................................................213.2.1. THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT ACT (1997)............................................................................................21
3.2.2. Land Acquisition Act (1965)...................................................................................................223.2.3. Land Tenure Regimes and Transfer of Land....................................................................22
3.3. VALUATION AND COMPENSATION OF ASSETS........................................................................................243.4. WORLD BANK REQUIREMENTS................................................................................................................254. INSTITUTIONAL RESPONSIBILITIES...................................................................................................27IN IMPLEMENTING THIS RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN, THREE KEY STAKEHOLDERS HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED INCLUDING THE MINISTRY OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT, MINISTRY OF LANDS, HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT AND REA.....................................................................................................................................27
4.1. Rural Electrification Agency.......................................................................................................274.2. Ministry of Local Government...................................................................................................27
iii
4.3. Ministry of Lands, Housing and Urban Development........................................................274.4. Related Line Ministries.................................................................................................................284.4.1. Ministry of Energy and Mineral Development......................................................284.4.2. Ministry of Agriculture, Animal Industry and Fisheries..................................284.4.3. Ministry of Health.................................................................................................................284.4.4. Ministry of Education and Sports................................................................................284.4.5. Ministry of Water, Lands and Environment...........................................................294.4.6. Ministry of Works, Housing and Communication................................................294.4.7. Ministry of Finance, Planning and Economic Development..........................29
4.5. IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE.............................................................................................................29
5. COMPENSATION FRAMEWORK..................................................................................................30
5.1. KEY PRINCIPLES....................................................................................................................................305.1.1. COMPENSATION AND RESETTLEMENT PACKAGES.....................................................................305.2. ELIGIBILITY.............................................................................................................................................325.3. RATES APPLIED.....................................................................................................................................335.3.1. GENERAL REMARKS AND ASSUMPTIONS....................................................................................335.3.2. CUT-OFF DATE..................................................................................................................................345.3.3. VALUATION CERTIFICATE................................................................................................................34
6. RESETTLEMENT ASSISTANCE AND RESTORATION OF LIVELIHOODS........................37
6.1. LIVELIHOOD RESTORATION STRATEGIES.........................................................................................376.2. SPECIAL ASSISTANCE FOR WOMEN AND VULNERABLE GROUPS...............................................37
7. PUBLIC CONSULTATION, PARTICIPATION AND DEVELOPMENT PLANNING...........39
7.1. COMMUNITY PERCEPTIONS OF THE PROJECT.................................................................................397.2. COMMUNITY CONCERNS......................................................................................................................397.2.1. IMPACT ON PROPERTY AND CULTURAL SITES...........................................................................39
8. GRIEVANCE MECHANISM.............................................................................................................. 41
8.1. MECHANISMS OF GRIEVANCE AND APPEALS.................................................................................418.1.1. Reconciliatory Procedure.................................................................................................418.1.2. Written Complaints to REA..............................................................................................418.1.3. Legal Redress..........................................................................................................................42
8.2. PUBLIC DISCLOSURE............................................................................................................................42
9. MONITORING, EVALUTION AND REPORTING FRAMEWORK..........................................43
9.1. Internal monitoring process.......................................................................................................439.1.1. During resettlement............................................................................................................439.1.2. After resettlement................................................................................................................449.1.3. Key Activities and Responsibilities.............................................................................44
9.2. EXTERNAL EVALUATION PROCESS..........................................................................................................449.2.1. Process Indicators................................................................................................................459.2.2. Outcome Indicators..............................................................................................................459.2.3. Key activities and responsibilities.......................................................................................46
9.3. RAP COMPLETION REPORT......................................................................................................................46
iv
9.4. COMPLETION AUDIT.................................................................................................................................46
v
GLOSSARY OF TERMSCompensation—Payment in cash or in kind for an asset or a resource that is acquired or affected by a project at the time the asset needs to be replaced.
Cut-off date—Date of completion of the census and assets inventory of persons affected by the project. Persons occupying the project area after the cutoff date are not eligible for compensation and/or resettlement assistance. Similarly, fixed assets (such as built structures, crops, fruit trees, and woodlots) established after the date of completion of the assets inventory, or an alternative mutually agreed on date, will not be compensated.
Host population—People living in or around areas to which people physically displaced by a project will be resettled who, in turn, may be affected by the resettlement.
Economic displacement—Loss of income streams or means of livelihood resulting from land acquisition or obstructed access to resources (land, water, or forest) resulting from the construction or operation of a project or its associated facilities.
Involuntary resettlement—Resettlement is involuntary when it occurs without the informed consent of the displaced persons or if they give their consent without having the power to refuse resettlement.
Land expropriation—Process whereby a public authority, usually in return for compensation, requires a person, household, or community to relinquish rights to land that it occupies or otherwise uses
OD 4.30—The World Bank Group Operational Directive on Involuntary Resettlement. OD 4.30 embodies the basic principles and procedures that underlie IFC’s approach to involuntary resettlement associated with its investment projects.
Project-affected household—All members of a household, whether related or not, operating as a single economic unit, who are affected by a project.
Project-affected person—Any person who, as a result of the implementation of a project, loses the right to own, use, or otherwise benefit from a built structure, land (residential, agricultural, or pasture), annual or perennial crops and trees, or any other fixed or moveable asset, either in full or in part, permanently or temporarily.
vi
Physical displacement—Loss of shelter and assets resulting from the acquisition of land associated with a project that requires the affected person(s) to move to another location.
Replacement cost—The rate of compensation for lost assets must be calculated at full replacement cost, that is, the market value of the assets plus transaction costs. With regard to land and structures, IFC defines “replacement costs” as follows:
agricultural land—the market value of land of equal productive use or potential located in the vicinity of the affected land, plus the cost of preparation to levels similar to or better than those of the affected land, plus the cost of any registration and transfer taxes;
land in urban areas—the market value of land of equal size and use, with similar or improved public infrastructure facilities and services preferably located in the vicinity of the affected land, plus the cost of any registration and transfer taxes;
household and public structures—the cost of purchasing or building a new structure, with an area and quality similar to or better than those of the affected structure, or of repairing a partially affected structure, including labor and contractors’ fees and any registration and transfer taxes. In determining the replacement cost, depreciation of the asset and the value of salvage materials are not taken into account, nor is the value of benefits to be derived from the project deducted from the valuation of an affected asset.
Resettlement Action Plan (RAP)—The document in which a project sponsor or other responsible entity specifies the procedures that it will follow and the actions that it will take to mitigate adverse effects, compensate losses, and provide development benefits to persons and communities affected by an investment project.
Resettlement assistance—Support provided to people who are physically displaced by a project. Assistance may include transportation, food, shelter, and social services that are provided to affected people during their relocation. Assistance may also include cash allowances that compensate affected people for the inconvenience associated with resettlement and defray the expenses of a transition to a new locale, such as moving expenses and lost work days.
vii
EXECUTIVE SUMMARYThe Government of Uganda, recognizing the importance of energy in transforming the quality of life of Ugandans, embarked on the process of systematic energy planning with the formulation of a National Energy Policy for Uganda in September 2002. The Energy Policy Goal is “ to meet the energy needs of Uganda’s population for social and economic development in an environmentally sustainable manner
Project DescriptionThe Government of Uganda has received financing from the World Bank towards the cost of the Energy for Rural Transformation Project Phase II, and intends to apply part of the loan proceeds to make payments under the contracts for Consultancy Services for Detailed Action Plan (RAP) for the Ayer-Kamdini-Minakulu-Bobi and Environs in Northern Uganda (75km). The proposed 75 kilometres Ayer-Kamdini-Bobi-Minakulu power distribution line project covers three district of Kole Oyam and Gulu, 10 sub countries and 84 villages/LCI cells. The study was to prepare a Resettlement Action Plan to establish compensation and resettlement costs for the PAPs before the implementation of the project.
The aim of the Resettlement Action Plan The purpose of the consultancy is to prepare a detailed RAP to establish the social impacts associated with setting up of these 33kV lines, ROW of clearing and setting of temporary camps for equipment storage construction and compensation of other resettlement costs for the Project Affected Persons (PAPs). The RAP has been carried out in a way that respects Uganda Government Policies as well as the World Bank’s O.P. 4.12 Involuntary Resettlement.Objectives of the RAPSpecifically, the resettlement action plan focused on determining the extent of resettlement impacts associated with establishment of the distribution line, and put in place measures to mitigate those impacts. The impacts here are to do with land/way-leaves acquisition and the accompanying loss or interruption of the livelihoods of the project affected people due to construction activities related to the proposed distribution lines. Additionally, this resettlement action plan aimed at carrying out consultations with relevant stakeholders, including potentially affected persons, to obtain their views and suggestions regarding the social impacts of the proposed project and measures to cover the losses.
Approach and Methodology
viii
The first task in planning resettlement was to identify a project’s adverse impacts and the populations that will be affected. As noted above, this usually requires the participation of qualified experts who have appropriate training and experience. Resettlement planning involves more than simple cadastral surveys or inventories of affected assets. Consultation with officials of local government, community leaders, and other representatives of the affected population was essential to gaining a comprehensive understanding of the types and degrees of adverse project effects. Property valuation and assessment of compensation awards has been carried out within the broad terms of reference (TOR) of the RAP study for the proposed Ayer-Kamdini- Minakulu -Bobi power distribution line project.
An inventory of lost and affected assets at the household, enterprise, and community level was undertaken in order to ascertain all losses that will result for each household, enterprise, or community affected by the project. Socioeconomic surveys and studies of all affected people were undertaken in order to understand socio-economic condition of the potentially affected persons in the project areas the study will used the sustainable livelihoods approach which is a way to improve understanding of the livelihoods of poor people. Analysis of surveys and studies to establish compensation parameters were undertaken in order, to design appropriate income restoration and sustainable development initiatives, and to identify baseline monitoring indicators; and analysis of the data collected in the census, assets inventory, and socioeconomic studies.
Project Impacts and Affected PersonsDetailed list of affected persons is attached as an annex to this report. Given that a 10 meter strip will be required for the way leaves and noting that most of the affected plots are within road reserves, this assessment team found that only crops and trees will be affected. There are Eighty Four (84) affected villages, in Kole, Oyam and Gulu Districts. The total number of claimants is 1143 and the assessed total compensation is Shs.95,675, 252/- (Ninety Five Million Six Hundred Seventy Five Thousand Two Hundred Fifty Two Thousand Shillings Only). Implementation ScheduleHaving assigned the different organizational responsibilities, this team anticipates that the RAP implementation is likely to cover a period of 13 months. The sequencing of activities bears in mind that some activities can be undertaken at the same time.
Compensation FrameworkInformation from the socio-economic survey and census guided the selection of the most appropriate compensation packages while bearing in mind the different scenarios. Due to lack of Area Compensation Rates for newly created districts of Oyam and Kole, the consultant applied/used the current
ix
Area Compensation Rates of Gulu district to arrive at the compensation awards to the PAPs.
Cut-off DateThe date of the valuation/assessment is November 2010
BudgetThere are Eighty Four (84) affected villages, in Kole, Oyam and Gulu Districts. The total number of claimants is 1143 and the assessed total compensation is Shs.95,675,252/- (Ninety Five Million Six Hundred Seventy Five Thousand Two Hundred Fifty Two Thousand Shillings Only). Resettlement Assistance and Restoration of LivelihoodsWherever possible, the Government of Uganda tries to avoid or minimize the displacement of people by exploring alternative project designs The Rural Electriction Agency guided by the Wayleaves Act, provides for realignment of power lines in order to minimize displacement of households or businesses. International guidelines like the IFC recommends that project sponsors undertake the necessary actions on behalf of all affected people, including members of the host communities in which displaced people will be settled.
Special Assistance for Women and Vulnerable GroupsThe Resettlement Planning team identifies this as the most appropriate option for resettlement assistance and livelihood restoration given that although women form a small percentage of the affected households, the nature of tenure agreements in Northern Uganda that is customary in nature makes women more vulnerable to access to productive resources. As a result women tend to suffer more than men as a result of social changes. Therefore throughout the development of this RAP some of the immediate and practical measures are proposed to improve women’s adaptation to resettlement.
Public Consultation, Participation and Development PlanningGenerally, most communities that were consulted were happy with the proposed project. They noted that some of the villages were previously connected to power but the facilities got vandalized during the war. It was observed that most of the trading centers had the potential to grow like Corner Mowlem but this was hampered by no power in the area. Most communities wondered when the actual work would begin given the need for power in schools, health centers and other related infrastructure including the trading centre. Other issues that were raised include impact of the power line on cemeteries and graveyards and payment for the crops destroyed, and were informed on the crops that would be identified during the census and valued, impact on structures and whether property would
x
be lost whether trees were not allowed under the wayleaves and would have to be compensated. On the compensation framework, one community member wondered whether compensation rates were negotiable suggesting that previous rates that have been found to be unfavorable and the method of compensation would be adopted. Additionally, community members wondered whether they will be given work to help in putting up the power line and were informed that should transmission come, employment opportunities would be availed where need. Members suggested that some of the opportunities that they should benefit from include cutting of trees, clearing of land and digging holes. On grievances, one community member narrated that previous power line planners did not compensate them for the crops lost and wondered what procedure they should use in case they have complaints. Considering that there is no structure at the moment, they were advised to inform or report this to the RDC. However, a grievance mechanism has been recommended in this report to manage the grievance process. Grievance MechanismRegardless of its scale, involuntary resettlement inevitably gives rise to grievances among the affected population over issues ranging from rates of compensation and eligibility criteria to the location of resettlement sites and the quality of services at those sites. There is need to ensure that procedures are in place to allow affected people to lodge a complaint or a claim (including claims that derive from customary law and usage) without cost and with the assurance of a timely and satisfactory resolution of that complaint or claim.
Monitoring, Evaluation and Reporting FrameworkThe purpose of monitoring and evaluation for this RAP will be to report about the effectiveness of the implementation of the RAP, covering resettlement, disbursement of compensation and effectiveness of public involvement, amongst others. Monitoring and purposeful evaluation will be key factors for successful resettlement activities. Monitoring will also entail evaluation of effectiveness of the grievance management process. The monitoring Framework proposed in this RAP includes a review of financial disbursements, compensation complaints and grievance redress, adherence to compensation payment schedule, support of vulnerable PAPs. RAP completion report During RAP implementation the consultant will submit to REA quarterly progress reports, after completion of resettlement, a final report will be submitted by REA prior to preparation of the project implementation report. This report will give overall assessment of the RAP process indicating activities undertaken, success of mitigation action ns and monitoring and well as useful lessons learnt.
xi
Completion AuditThe purpose of Completion Audit will be to establish whether REA implemented all activities needed to ensure compliance proposed resettlement commitments and applicable national and international policies.
xii
1. INTRODUCTIONThe Government of Uganda, recognizing the importance of energy in transforming the quality of life of Ugandans, embarked on the process of systematic energy planning with the formulation of a National Energy Policy for Uganda in September 2002. The Energy Policy Goal is “ to meet the energy needs of Uganda’s population for social and economic development in an environmentally sustainable manner”. The Policy covers the various energy sub-sectors including: Power, Petroleum, New and Renewable Sources of Energy, and Atomic Power. While the sub-sectors are supply based, the Policy also covers energy demand issues and proposes strategies and plans for supplying the required energy. One of the strategies highlighted is the implementation of the Rural Electrification Strategy and Plan 2001-2010 (RESP) which has been passed by Cabinet in February 2001, as dictated by Section 63 of the Electricity Act 1999. Statutory Instrument No. 75 of 2001, The Electricity (Establishment and Management of the Rural Electrification Fund) Instrument 2001, established three inter-related mechanisms for management of Uganda’s rural electrification program namely, the Rural Electrification Fund (REF), the Rural Electrification Board (REB) and the Rural Electrification Agency (REA) all supervised by the Minister responsible for Energy. REA serves as the Secretariat to the Board whose principal responsibility is to ensure management of the Fund for equitable promotion of rural electricity access and connectivity.
1.1. Project DescriptionThe Government of Uganda has received financing from the World Bank towards the cost of the Energy for Rural Transformation Project Phase II, and intends to apply part of the loan proceeds to make payments under the contracts for Consultancy Services for Detailed Action Plan (RAP) for the Ayer-Kamdini-Minakulu-Bobi and Environs in Northern Uganda (75km). The proposed 75 kilometres Ayer-Kamdini-Bobi-Minakulu power distribution line project covers three district of Kole Oyam and Gulu, 10 sub countries and 84 villages/LCI cells. The study was to prepare a Resettlement Action Plan to establish compensation and resettlement costs for the PAPs before the implementation of the project. The study was carried in the way that takes into account the Uganda Laws/policies as well as the social safeguard policies of the World Bank and other funding agencies.
The proposed construction of distribution lines is associated with
Construction of HV power lines consisting of line structures, accessories and conductors;
Cleaning of right of way as necessary Construction of HV/LV sub stations and associated infrastructure;
Construction of the low voltage reticulation for the covered trading centres and towns;
Construction of the workers’ camp and storage facilities for the project materials
The project located in Northern Uganda will include the construction of 33kv line of a route length of at least 65 km with LV networks at selected potential load centers divided up as detailed below:
1. 43.5 km of 33 kV power line from Corner Aboke to Kamdini Township including tee-offs to Atapara Mission and Loro Teacher Training College;
2. Tee-offs of 4km to Aber, 2km to Loro PTC, and 3.5km to Atapara Mission;
3. 25 km of 33kV power line from Bobi to Minakulu to Kamdini
1.2. The aim of the Resettlement Action Plan The purpose of the consultancy is to prepare a detailed RAP to establish the social impacts associated with setting up of these 33kV lines, ROW of clearing and setting of temporary camps for equipment storage construction and compensation of other resettlement costs for the Project Affected Persons (PAPs). The RAP has been carried out in a way that respects Uganda Government Policies as well as the World Bank’s O.P. 4.12 Involuntary Resettlement.
1.3. Objectives of the RAPSpecifically, the resettlement action plan focused on determining the extent of resettlement impacts associated with establishment of the distribution line, and put in place measures to mitigate those impacts. The impacts here are to do with land/way-leaves acquisition and the accompanying loss or interruption of the livelihoods of the project affected people due to construction activities related to the proposed distribution lines.
Additionally, this resettlement action plan aimed at carrying out consultations with relevant stakeholders, including potentially affected persons, to obtain their views and suggestions regarding the social impacts of the proposed project and measures to cover the losses. The outcome of the consultations are reflected in the RAP report and incorporated into the project design as appropriate. The results of the consultations will be made available to all relevant stakeholders, including potentially affected persons.
1.3.1. Approach and Methodology
1.3.1.1. Reconnaissance and consultations
2
The consultancy team comprising valuers, surveyors, sociologists and the RAP specialist visited the district of Kole, Oyam and Gulu and went through the areas of the proposed wayleaves route/project site. The objective of this activity was to get firsthand experience of the project area as to well as introduce the tam and the project to the local leaders.The consultant met and made consultations with the district and subcounty leaders in Kole, Oyam and Gulu districts. The purpose of these meetings was for the consultant to introduce himself and the project and seek support/assistance and cooperation of the leaders in having easy entry to the communities while doing fieldwork. Consultation meetings enabled the consultant to receive guidance in planning sensitization and public awareness meetings for the project affected persons at a village levels.
1.3.1.2. CensusProperty valuation and assessment of compensation awards was carried out within the broad terms of reference (TOR) of the RAP study for the proposed Ayer-Kamdini- Minakulu -Bobi power distribution line project. In accordance with the scope, the valuation task of the study were to:-
(a) Identify the project affected person using procedures approved by the Chief Government Value, carry out detailed valuation of all affected land, properties and livelihoods affected by the project, which provided the basis for compensation/resettlement.
(b) Compile land acquisition and resettlement costs for areas that PAPs are to be resettled if any.
(c) Ensure the data collection during valuation is done on forms acceptable to the Chief Government Valuer and the process is properly witnessed by the client.
(d) Ensure that all property such as houses and PAPs are photo document, including damaged crops, for easy identification during disclosure and payments.
(e) Witnessing the valuation exercise: REA staff shall sign on behalf of the client during the valuation exercise. Other signatories were be the Consultant and local council and the independent NGO
(f) The valuation data base is to be duplicated one copy to the client and the other to the consultant during the valuation process.
(g) An independent Witness NGO were appointed by the client to witness the valuation exercise.
1.3.1.3. Mobilization and SensitizationThe consultant carried out mobilization and sensitization of the PAPs at village levels in all areas affected by distribution line. Mobilization and sensitization was aimed at preparing the PAPs for the activities under the
3
assignment. The consultant was able to explain to the PAPs the possible route (project site) the likely damage to be caused, the process and basis of assessment of damages for compensation. The PAPs were also told of the benefits that would accrue to the area in general because of the provision of electricity supply. The consultant informed the PAPs of the available mechanism to address any grievances that may arise during project implementation. The views and concerns of the communities would be recorded.
1.3.1.4. Identification of the Project siteThe client provided the consultant with maps defining the routes of the proposed power line. The consultant sought further information from the design consultants which were used by the surveyors to define the route on the ground. The route of the power line determined the districts, the sub counties, parishes, villages and individual land holdings affected by the project.
1.3.1.5. Sensitization of PAPsGuided by the route and in consultation with the district and sub county officials the consultant was able to identify locations venues for PAPs sensitization meetings. Then the consultant prepared a program for the meetings. In the meetings the valuation team together with other members of the consultancy team explained the Government policies on rural electrification, assessment and payment compensation for any damages and urged communities to cooperate and support the field team. The consultancy team explained the basis of assessment, the methodology and how grievances would be addressed.
1.3.1.6. Field Data CaptureAfter carrying out consultations and sensitization, the surveyors defined the 10 metres wayleaveas corridors including the different individual land holdings and identified of the land owners. The crops, economic trees and other assets to be affected were referenced, enumerated and detailed entered on the assessment forms. The exercise was witnessed by the beneficiaries and the LCI chair persons. The forms were stamped by LCI chairperson as proof of the data collected. This census was undertaken in order to enumerate the affected people and register them according to location; register the affected population by residence or locality; establish a list of legitimate beneficiaries before the project’s onset that counters spurious claims from those moving into the project area solely in anticipation of benefits; lay a framework for subsequent socioeconomic research needed to establish fair compensation rates and to design, monitor, and evaluate sustainable income restoration or development interventions; and providing a baseline for monitoring and evaluation.
4
1.3.1.7. Inventory of lost and affected AssetsAn inventory of lost and affected assets at the household, enterprise, and community level was undertaken in order to ascertain all losses that will result for each household, enterprise, or community affected by the project. The survey accounted for land acquisition and loss of physical assets as well as loss of income—temporary or permanent—resulting from displacement of household members from employment or income-generating resources.
1.3.1.8. Socio-economic Surveys and StudiesThe RAP identified all people affected by the project and all adverse impacts on their livelihoods associated with the project’s land acquisition. Typical effects include breakup of communities and social support networks; loss of dwellings, farm buildings, and other structures (wells, boreholes, irrigation works, and fencing), agricultural land, trees, and standing crops; impeded or lost access to community resources such as water sources, pasture, forest and woodland, medicinal plants, game animals, or fisheries; loss of business; loss of access to public infrastructure or services; and reduced income resulting from these losses.
Socioeconomic surveys and studies of all affected people were undertaken in order to understand socio-economic condition of the potentially affected persons in the project areas the study will used the sustainable livelihoods approach which is a way to improve understanding of the livelihoods of poor people. It draws on the main factors that affect poor people's livelihoods and the typical relationships between these factors. The two key components of the Sustainable Livelihoods Approach are: a framework that helps in understanding the complexities of poverty and a set of principles to guide action to address and overcome poverty. The framework places people, particularly rural poor people, at the centre of a web of inter-related influences that affect how these people create a livelihood for themselves and their households.
Closest to the people at the centre of the framework are the resources and livelihood assets that they have access to and use. These can include natural resources, technologies, their skills, knowledge and capacity, their health, access to education, sources of credit, or their networks of social support. The extent of their access to these assets is strongly influenced by their vulnerability context, which takes account of trends (for example, economic, political, and technological), shocks (for example, epidemics, natural disasters, civil strife) and seasonality (for example, prices, production, and employment opportunities). Access is also influenced by the prevailing social, institutional and political environment, which affects the ways in which people combine and use their assets to achieve their goals. These are their livelihood strategies.
5
People are the main concern, rather than the resources they use or their governments. SLA is used to identify the main constraints and opportunities faced by poor people, as expressed by them. It builds on these definitions, and then supports poor people as they address the constraints, or take advantage of opportunities. The framework is neither a model that aims to incorporate all the key elements of people's livelihoods, nor a universal solution. Rather, it is a means of stimulating thought and analysis, and it needs to be adapted and elaborated depending on the situation.
Therefore, the methodology that was used for this assessment is that of mixed methods, integrating both quantitative and qualitative methods. It includes a review of related literature on policies, a socio-economic survey that will be used to determine the vulnerability context of community members that are translated into negative or positive socio-economic impacts as well as strategies that will be proposed to help them cope or adapt to the negative impacts in order to improve their livelihood outcomes. The qualitative aspects of this assessment include meetings, in-depth interviews with key informants and community meetings.
Figure 1: Sustainable Livelihoods Framework
The study was undertaken in three main phases:
a.) Mobilization and Planning: This phase included the desk study and development of field instruments. The literature that was reviewed included policy documents, district development plans of affected districts as well as other related literature. It also includes mobilization for sensitization meetings
b.) Fieldwork: Data Analysis and Synthesisc.) Report Writing
Mobilization and Planning
6
This phase included the desk study and development of field instruments. The literature that was reviewed included policy documents, district development plans of sub counties covered by the project areas as well as other related literature. A reconnaissance visit of sub counties and districts was undertaken in order to help plan for the sensitization meetings and the detailed field activities. A structured questionnaire will be developed and pretested for accuracy as well as interview guides that were to be used for the key informant interviews. Two research assistants were selected from the localities and trained for a period of two days. During the training sessions, we will be able to agree on terms and descriptions of different phenomenon that will help in the interpretation of the data.
Fieldwork
The fieldwork was undertaken between the months of September and October where a census of the potentially affected households was undertaken. In situ, local characteristics of different social groups within communities will be taken into account while selecting respondents and indicators such gender, ethnicity and age will be taken into consideration in order to understand labor dynamics, employment opportunities and gaps, literacy levels and access to social services amongst others. Community meetings were conducted in the project affected area in order to understand the social cultural set up within the communities that would help determine the fears that communities have towards the project. Key informant interviews were undertaken with local government staff and other development partners in the area to determine the strength of local institutions and national policies that would help sustain the project mitigation measures.
The processing of the socio-economic data began soon after the start of fieldwork, completed questionnaires were returned periodically from the field to a data processing center, first in the field where they were checked for consistency and check for response errors. The data was then entered into SPSS coded and cleaned in Kampala. The data entry ended in October and data analysis was completed within two weeks.
1.3.2. Analysis of Surveys and Studies
Analysis of surveys and studies to establish compensation parameters were undertaken in order, to design appropriate income restoration and sustainable development initiatives, and to identify baseline monitoring indicators; and analysis of the data collected in the census, assets inventory, and socioeconomic studies serves three ends: 1) it provides information needed to establish an entitlement matrix for household- and community-level compensation; 2) it yields basic economic and social information needed to design appropriate livelihood restoration and development
7
interventions; and 3) it provides quantifiable demographic, economic, educational, occupational, and health indicators for future monitoring and evaluation of RAP implementation.
This information was essential to designing livelihood restoration measures for affected households and communities. Likewise, the assessments of losses resulting from the effects of the project are better understood in the context of the overall household and community economies. Household data can, in turn, was disaggregated to identify economic strata within communities (the poorest and most vulnerable households, households dependent on remittances, etc.) and to identify appropriate assistance as well as development strategies for the populations affected by the project. Socioeconomic studies also yield important information on the ways in which affected communities are organized and function. These studies provided the team with an understanding of leadership and decision making processes within the community that may function independently of the prevailing political and administrative structures. This understanding also helps resettlement planners to identify informal social support networks that are important for the survival of the community, particularly more vulnerable members of the community such as households headed by women, the impoverished, and groups that suffer social and economic discrimination.
8
2. PROJECT IMPACTS AND AFFECTED PERSONS
This chapter is a presentation of the project affected persons as identified in the census and registration exercise. Census and registration provide information on the scale and complexity of the required resettlement planning (for example, the size, distribution, and socioeconomic diversity of the population). The census must encompass all people adversely affected by the project, regardless of their legal status—landowner, holder of land rights, tenant, illegal squatter—or whether they are actually living on an affected site at the time of the census. In other words, lack of legal land title does not disqualify people from resettlement assistance. Private landowners and holders of rights to land as well as any person currently occupying public or private land for shelter, business purposes, or other sources of livelihood (caretakers, squatters, scavengers) should be included in the census.
While landless people or squatters may not be eligible for land compensation, they may be eligible for resettlement assistance, compensation for assets (such as shelters and standing crops, orchards, or woodlots), and, where practicable, the benefits of development interventions, which may include provision of land. Resettlement planners must give particular attention to vulnerable groups living in the project area. These groups may include households headed by women or children, people with disabilities, the extremely poor, the elderly, and groups that suffer social and economic discrimination, including indigenous peoples and minorities. Members of vulnerable groups may require special or supplementary resettlement assistance because they are less able to cope with the physical and/or economic displacement than the affected population in general.
2.1. Project Affected PersonsDetailed list of affected persons is attached as an annex to this report. The affected persons are presented as an annex in this report. Given that a 10 meter strip will be required for the way leaves and noting that most of the affected plots are within road reserves, this assessment team found that only crops and trees will be affected. There are Eighty Four (84) affected villages, in Kole, Oyam and Gulu Districts. The total number of claimants is 1143 and the assessed total compensation is Shs.95,675,252/- (Ninety Five Million Six Hundred Seventy Five Thousand Two Hundred Fifty Two Thousand Shillings Only).
2.2. Socio-Economic Baseline of PAPs2.2.1. Age and Gender
Results from the socio-economic survey suggest that a bigger percentage of the PAPs fall within the 40 – 64 age bracket. This age group is still economically active and forms a significant proportion of the labor force.
9
39%
46%
9%7%
Age Distribution of Project Affected Persons
18 - 39 years40 - 64 years65+ yearsNR
85%
15%
Gender Distribution in Affected Areas
MaleFemale
85% of the affected households are men while 15% are females, suggesting that female households form part of the vulnerable groups of this study given that are a minority. Recommendations have been made in the resettlement and livelihood restoration component.
2.2.2. Educational Attainment
Investment in education contributes to the accumulation of human capital, which is essential for higher incomes and sustained income growth. Formal education is highly instrumental and even necessary to improve the production capacity of a nation and discusses the rationality behind investment in human capital. Empirical evidences of human capital model reveal that investment in education has positive correlation with economic growth and development. Results from the socio-economic survey suggest that most of the respondents interviewed had maximum level of educational attainment of primary school level.
Education affects many aspects of life, including individual demographic and health behavior. Studies have shown that educational level is strongly associated with contraceptive use, fertility, and the general health status, morbidity, and mortality of children. In each household, for all persons age five years or older, data were collected on the highest level of education attended and the highest grade completed at that level.
Results from the socio-economic survey suggests that 59% of the affected household Upper Primary as their highest level of educational attainment. The implication for these levels is that a bigger proportion of the population would need more skills in order to engage in nonfarm income generating activities. In order to transform livelihood assets into livelihood outcomes, communities need software processes that can help strengthen their coping and livelihood strategies.
10
2.2.3. Ethnicity
The ethnic groups in an area give an indication on how diverse a community is and also which minority groups exist in the area. 98% of affected households are Langi.
2.2.4. Livelihoods and Employment
Results from the socio-economic survey that over 78% of households interviewed were engaging in subsistence agriculture this means that over reliance on agro-based that are the least in terms of economic returns is the main reason why there is mass poverty in the affected areas. Benefits from non farm income generating activities can help boost the production and productivity of a household, however due to low levels of education attainment, this is not possible.
1%
12%
78%
2% 0%7%
1%
Occupations of Project Affected Persons
Casual LaborerCivil ServantFarmerNRRetiredSelf EmployedStudent
2.2.5. Ownership and Particulars of the affected Person
In order to understand the vulnerability context of affected persons it was important to understand their level of access to natural or productive assets like land. The results from the socioeconomic survey suggest that 98% of affected persons that were identified own the land that is affected while the
11
10%
59%
17%
5%7%1%
Highest Level of Edu-cational Attainment
Lower Primary (P1 - P4)
Upper Primary (P5 - P7)
O'Level A'LevelTertiary Other
other 2% include co-owners and tenants. It is already observed that most of the affected persons are males and hence the few that are women are likely to remain vulnerable to change due to their limited.As northern Ugandans return home, land is becoming a major source of tension, and it is the most vulnerable members of society – women, children, former abductees – who will suffer most. The majority of land in northern Uganda is held by customary tenure i.e. through informal rules enforced by traditional clan structures. Results from the socio-economic survey confirm this observation by revealing that 93% of affected households have land under the customary tenure agreement. Under customary tenure, the concept of land ‘ownership’ is misleading, because future generations are considered to have rights to the land. People are ‘custodians’ rather than owners of land. But to function as it should, the system of customary tenure is reliant on social cohesion and stable family units. It has difficulty accommodating the breakdown in social order, the greater number of children born out of wedlock, and the increase in cohabitation that conflict and displacement have produced. Results from the socio-economic survey suggest that of those who own land 98% have encumbrances on that land given that family members can claim the land and are thus licencees. 98% of these structures are used for both residential and small businesses. Hence maintaining cohesion between families is important for sustainable livelihoods and ensuring access to housing.
98%
2%1%
Encumberances On Af -fected Land
Claim by Family MembersDocuments AvailableNo Idea
90%
10%
Usage of Structures on Affected Plot
Residential OnlyResidential & Small Busi-ness
However, this cohesion is threatened by the fact that Northern Uganda’s population is extraordinarily young, with a median age of 14 for females and 13 for males.16 Many young people having grown up in the camps, knowledge of customary land law has diminished, including about the rights of widows and orphans, who under Acholi customary law are granted access
12
to land. Formal structures for dealing with land disputes, such as local council courts, are weak and often corrupt. Efforts should be made both to strengthen formal legal structures and to integrate the traditional clan system and knowledge within those structures, for example by calling elders to sit as witnesses on local council courts during cases involving land.
2.2.6. Burial Sites
Project affected persons were asked whether they have any graveyards or burial sites located within the 10 me way leave area. According to the constitution of the Republic of Uganda, under Article 37 every person has a right to belong to, enjoy, practice and profess, maintain and promote any culture, cultural institution or tradition in community with others. Under the National Objectives and Directive Principles Of State Policy, the State is obliged under objective XXIV and XXVII To promote protect and preserve cultural values and practices which enhance the dignity and wellbeing of Ugandans. Under objective XXV the State is obliged to preserve, promote and generally promote the culture of preservation of public property and Uganda’s heritage the state is also obliged under the objective to promote and implement energy policies that will ensure that people’s basic needs and those of environmental protection are met.According to the socio-economic studies, 70% of affected households were found to have burial sites on the affected plots. However, further analysis revealed that of those burial sites and graveyards, only 4% were likely to be located under the way leaves. In this regard and with consultation of communities, graveyards will be avoided so that they don’t have to be relocated. The impact on graveyards is therefore not significant given the mitigation measure that has been integrated in the compensation framework.
2.2.7. Income Sources
PAPs were asked what their primary, secondary and tertiary sources of income with the aim of assessing the project impacts in relation to the livelihoods. Results from the socio-economic survey suggest that 87% primarily depend on crop production as an income sources.
13
1%
29%
71%
Households With or Without Burial Sites in Affected Plot
N/ANo Burial Site in Affected PlotBurial sites in Affected Plot
0% 3%
9%
87%
1%
Primary Income Sources of Affected Households
Animal HusbandryBusinessFormal Employ-mentCrop Hus-bandryNone
Given the subsistence nature of crop production, marketing constraints and price fluctuations, farmers in the project area remain vulnerable to price and climatic shocks. Furthermore, as the major income source in the project affected area, crop damage causes a significant income loss. Moreover, even without any agricultural shock, crop production under rain fed conditions is subject to seasonality. Thus, other sources of income are needed to smooth consumption and income across the cropping season and post-harvest season. Under risky environments, risk-averse poor households tend to diversify sources of income away from agriculture to decrease risk ex ante.
In adapting to these shocks, farmers in the project area have opted for animal rearing as a tertiary source of income. Engaging in livestock provides an opportunity to gain access to liquid assets that they can use during times of need specifically economic hardships while enhancing food security. During the socio-economic survey, 99% of the households have small ruminants with mainly include goats followed by poultry which suggests that most have adopted alternative approaches to achieving food security. The absence of large ruminants could be attributed to the fact that most households are still building their physical assets that would help them in adapting to the changing economic needs. Prior to the conflict, the Acholi people kept large numbers of cattle, which were a source of wealth and pride. Because much of the livestock was wiped out and virtually all other assets destroyed during the conflict, land has become the only resource for many. Restocking cattle populations could reduce the pressure on land. This is one of many policy tools that will need to be employed if future land disputes are to be mitigated.
2.2.8. General Information about Children
On average each household has 1.447619 children under 5 years, 2.52 are of school going age, 2.07 are in primary school, 1.57 are in secondary school,
14
1% 1%
99%
Others Sources of Income for Project
Affected Households
Crop Hus-bandryBusinessAnimal Husbandry
while 1.42 are attending tertiary institutions. Although the USE and UPE programmes are in place, many parents are still burdened with provision of scholastic materials and food amongst others and hence still have a high dependency ratio. School enrolment in Oyam has been on increase since inception of UPE from about 20,613 from inception of UPE in 1997 (10,817 boys and 9,796 girls), 97,506 in 2006 when Oyam started as a District to the present enrolment of 112,091 (57,043 boys and 55,048 girls). At household level, only 11.4% of survey respondents were of school going age but not attending school. As shown in the graph below, most of the children walk to school and hence any impact relating to relocating schools take into account the impact on children.
68%
23%
1%8%
Means of Transport for School Going Children
WalkPublic MeansPrivate MeansOthers
This assessment team has found that no physical infrastructure will be affected by this project and there is no impact on children in the affected villages relating to increased walking distance to schools that would reduce their performance.
2.2.9. Impaired PersonsPreviously referred to as disabled persons, persons with impairment are identified as vulnerable given the existing institutions that constrain their participation in all activities of life. Results from the socio-economic survey suggest that only 4% of the affected persons are living with some form of impairment. As shown in the graph below, of those who were impaired, only small percentages had physical, visual, mentally and hearing impairments.
15
1% 1% 4%2%
92%
Nature of Impairement in Project Af -fected Households
HearingVisualPhysicalMentalOther
The category of other forms of impairment could include people living with HIV/AIDs or any other persons that are chronically ill including the elderly. The restoration packages proposed in this plan have taken care of these vulnerable groups.Against this background, PAPs were asked to identify the type of health facilities that they have access to. Results suggest that 52% have access to health facility III only 32% have access to referral hospitals.
32%
2%52%
14%
0%
Access to Health Facilities in Project Area
HospitalHealth facility IVHealth facility IIIHealth facility IIHealth facility I
In terms of distance to the nearest health facility, the majority have to walk less than 5km to their nearest health facility. This means that in terms of health infrastructure, community members remain vulnerable and poor.
16
According to the community, poor health is one of the effects of poverty. It produces a vicious cycle. Poor health leads to inability to work, which in turn leads to failure to produce food/earn income. This eventually leads to poverty. A person who is in such a trap is vulnerable to disease and death.
Less than 5km
5 – 10km 10 or more0
50100150200250
Distance to the Nearest Health Facility
Series1
Distance
Freq
uency
Having appreciated the health vulnerability, the assessment team integrated these concerns in the design of the power line and when community members were asked whether they foresaw that the health facilities would be affected; 82% said that they would be affected while 18% said that they would not be affected. In the planning phase, such institutions were avoided.
2.2.10. Production Systems
Understanding production systems in important in addressing gender production constraints at household level as they give an indication of the contribution of crops grown on affected plot affect total household income. Results suggest that on a scale of 1 – 10, there is a 50% chance that affected crops will have a significant impact on household incomes as shown in the graph below.
17
The most predominant crop grown is maize and is considered as a cash crop for many households. The price of maize per kilo fluctuates depending on the production levels. At the moment a kilo goes for 200 Uganda Shillings.
However, further analysis revealed that of those crops that are likely to be affected, most are either in the background of the plot or in the right of way.
18
2.2.11. Social Network and Support System
Given that no household will be physically relocated, the analysis on social networks and support system has been excluded from this baseline survey. Most community members will continue associating with community organizations in the area.
19
3. LEGAL FRAMEWORK FOR LAND ACQUISITION AND COMPENSATION
The legal framework of a RAP describes all laws, decrees, policies and regulations relevant to the resettlement activities associated with a project. Using the IFC guidelines, this RAP identifies, reviews and abides by all laws of the host country that are applicable to land acquisition and involuntary resettlement including the scope of the power of eminent domain and the nature of compensation associated with it, both the procedures for assessing compensation values and the schedule for making compensation payments; the legal and administrative procedures applicable, including the appeals process and the normal time for such procedures; land titling and registration procedures; and laws and regulations relating to the agencies responsible for implementing resettlement and those related to land compensation, consolidation, land use, environment, water use, and social welfare.
The Constitution of the Republic of Uganda and the Land Act Cap 227 require that compensation is paid if a development project would damage structures or other property, or take private land. The same requirement is provided by World Bank policies and guidelines. World Bank’s Operational Policy 4.12 “Involuntary Resettlement" requires that displaced persons are compensated at full replacement cost and assisted during the relocation. While it is noted that no person shall be physically displaced by the project this section below, national laws and those of WB relevant to this RAP are discussed.
3.1. Relevant National LawsFor land take and displacement of people, specific attention is drawn to two Ugandan laws that are applicable to land tenure, compensation and resettlement, namely:
i) The Constitution of the Republic of Uganda, 1995ii) The Land Act, Cap 227
a) The Constitution of the Republic of Uganda (1995) creates for government and local authorities a statutory power of compulsory acquisition of land in public interest, and makes provision, inter alia, for the “prompt payment of fair and adequate compensation” prior to the taking of possession of any privately-owned property.
20
Such compensation is assessed in accordance with the valuation principles laid out in Section 78 of the Land Act (Cap 227), briefly outlined below:
i) The value for customary land is the open market value of unimproved land;
ii) The value of buildings on the land is taken at open market value for urban areas, and depreciated replacement cost for rural areas;
iii) The value of standing crops on the land is determined in accordance with the district compensation rates established by the respective District Land Board. Annual crops which could be harvested during the period of notice to vacate given to the landowner/ occupier of the land are excluded in determining compensation values;
iv) In addition to the total compensation assessed, there is a disturbance allowance paid of 15% or, if less than six months’ notice to vacate is given, 30% of the total sum assessed.
b) The Land Act principally addresses four issues namely; holding, control, management and land disputes. As regards tenure, the Act repeats, in Section 3, provisions of Article 237 of the Constitution which vests land ownership in the citizens of Uganda, to be held under customary, freehold, mailo or leasehold tenure systems. However, the Land Act provides for acquisition of land or rights to use land for public works.
Regarding control of land use, the Act reaffirms statutory power of compulsory acquisition conferred on the government and local authorities under articles 26 (2) and 237(2) (a) of the Constitution (Section 43). Since the Act does not repeal the Land Acquisition Act No. 14 of 1965, it is assumed that this legislation, meets requirements of Article 26(2) of the Constitution that requires a law to be in place for the payment of compensation and access to the courts. The Act also requires that landowners manage and utilize land in accordance with regulatory land use planning (Sections 44 and 46). Section 77(2) of the revised edition (2000) of the Land Act 1998 provides for a disturbance allowance on top of the computed compensation amount as shown below:
i) 30% of compensation amount if quit notice is given within 6 months.
ii) 15% of compensation amount if quit notice is given after 6 months.
21
The above will be two key legal instruments under which compensation and resettlement will be implemented in this RAP but there are other relevant laws as discussed below.
3.2. Other Laws3.2.1. The Local Government Act (1997)
Local Government Act 1997 provides for the system of Local Governments, which is based on the District. Under Kole, Gulu and Oyam (the districts traversed by the power line) there are lower local governments and administrative units, namely Local Council I, II, II, IV and V. Chairperson of LC IV is the political head of a district while the Chief Administrative Officer (CAO) is its technical head. This system provides for elected Councils whereby chairmen nominate the executive committee of each council, functions of which include:a.) Initiating and formulating policy for approval by council;b.) Overseeing the implementation of Government and Council policies,
and monitoring and coordinating activities of Non-Government Organizations in the district; and
c.) Receiving and solving disputes forwarded to it from lower local governments.
3.2.2. Land Acquisition Act (1965)This Act makes provision for procedures and method of compulsory acquisition of land for public purposes whether for temporary or permanent use. The Minister responsible for land may authorize any person to enter upon the land, survey the land, dig or bore the subsoil or any other actions necessary for ascertaining whether the land is suitable for a given public purpose. However, compensation should be paid to any person who suffers damage as a result of such actions.The Land Acquisition Act stops at payment of compensation to affected people. In Uganda, it is not a legal requirement for a project to purchase alternative land for affected people. Once affected people are promptly and adequately compensated, the project proponent’s obligations stop at this extent and there is no legal requirement or provision that people should be moved or provided with alternative land. Therefore, in Ugandan legal context, once people are compensated, they are expected to vacate affected properties without further claim and in this lies a major contrast with WB requirements.
22
3.2.3. Land Tenure Regimes and Transfer of LandArticle 237 of the Constitution, 1995, vests land ownership in citizens of Uganda and identifies four land tenure systems, namely: customary; freehold; mailo; and leasehold. The incidents of these systems are detailed under Section 4 of the Land Act (Cap 227). These tenure systems are provided relevant to the road project are outlined below:
3.2.3.1. Customary TenureThe customary tenure is the most dominant tenure arrangement in the Acholi region. Important attributes include the following:
The tenure is governed by rules generally accepted as binding and authoritative by the class of persons to which it applies. In other words customary regime is not governed by written law.
Land is owned in perpetuity. Customary occupants are occupant of former public land, and occupy
land by virtue of their customary rights; they have proprietary interest in the land and are entitled to certificates of customary ownership which may be acquired through application to the Parish Land Committee and eventual issuance by the District Land Board.
3.2.3.2. Freehold TenureA number of households have free hold tenure and this tenure has the following attributes:
This tenure derives its legality from the Constitution of Uganda and its incidents from the written law.
It involves the holding of land in perpetuity or for a period less than perpetuity fixed by a condition.
It enables the holder to exercise, subject to the law, full powers of ownership.
3.2.3.3. Leasehold TenureThis tenure system is:
Created either by contract or by operation of the law; A form under which the landlord of lessor grants the tenant or
lessee exclusive possession of the land, usually for a period defined and in return for a rent;
The tenant has security of tenure and a proprietary interest in the land.
23
Although only these latter forms of tenure are legally defined under the Land Act, the context of common law also recognizes the statute of “Licensee” or “Sharecroppers”, these terms having similar meanings in practice.Licensees are persons granted authority to use land within for agricultural production. Traditionally, such production would be limited to annual crops. Licensees have no legal security of tenure or any propriety right in the land. Their tenure is purely contractual.
3.2.3.4. Mailo TenureThe Mailo Land Tenure was not found in most of the villages that are covered by the project area
3.2.3.5. Right of Spouse and ChildrenThe rights of spouse and children are protected under the Constitution of Uganda and the Land Act (Cap 227). The consent of spouse and children must be acquired prior to any transaction by the head of household on land on which the family ordinarily resides. Section 40 of the Land Act, 1998 requires that no person shall:
a. Sell, exchange, transfer, pledge, mortgage or lease any land; or enter into any contract for the sale, exchange, transfer, pledge, mortgage or lease of any land;
b. Give away any land inter vivos, or enter into any transaction in respect of land: In the case of land on which the person ordinarily resides with his
or her spouse, and from which they derive their sustenance, except with the prior written consent of the spouse;
In the case of land on which the person ordinarily resides with his or her dependent children of majority age, except with the prior written consent of the dependent children of majority age;
In the case of land on which the person ordinarily resides with his or her dependent children below the majority age, except with the prior written consent of the Committee1;
In the case of land on which ordinarily reside orphans below majority age with interest in inheritance of the land, except with prior written consent of the Committee.
1 “Committees “ are defined under Section 65 of the Land Act ; they are Parish Land Committees.
24
3.3. Valuation and Compensation of Assets Land take, compensation and relocation were the most frequent issues of debate encountered during consultations with PAP. Hence, at the core of this RAP is an aim to ensure project development embraces equitable and appropriate compensation approaches that meet Ugandan law and international requirements. Valuation and compensation are in accordance with rates set at district level for crops and “non-permanent” structures. The rates, which are enacted by District Land Boards, are established and updated at District level. Permanent structures are valued on a case-by-case basis. However, to meet World Bank requirements, in some cases, additional compensation measures will have to be identified by the Project in order to ensure that all households improve, or at least restore, their livelihoods and standards of living. Since no household will be moved by the project, this applies to income restoration where roadside businesses are temporarily disrupted or lost.
3.4. World Bank RequirementsWorld Bank’s Operational Policy 4.12 on involuntary resettlement requires that affected persons should be compensated at full replacement cost and assisted during relocation. There are some stark gaps between Uganda and WB resettlement requirements. For example, as earlier mentioned, a project proponents are not legally bound to neither procure alternative land nor provide relocation assistance to affected people if they provided fair financial compensation based on a legally accepted valuation process. In a number of situations, as shown in table above, WBG requirements are more favorable to affected persons than Ugandan law. REA is committed to undertaking appropriate compensation approaches to meet both Ugandan law and World Bank requirements such as;a.) Compensating for loss of income after affected persons are displaced.b.) Compensation for tenants who might not have legal land rights, but
have undertaken development or farming activities on affected land.c.) Wherever feasible and acceptable to affected persons, provide land-
for-land compensation. d.) Provide property owners with cash compensation at full replacement
cost.e.) Wherever appropriate, provide skills assistance to affected farmers in
areas such as improved crop and animal husbandry and records keeping.
However, regarding to project impacts identified in this RAP a gap analysis was undertaken so as to plan for unforeseen circumstances.
25
Table 1: analysis of gaps between World Bank Requirements and Ugandan requirements
Impact World Bank requirement
Uganda requirement Gaps and how these will be addressed
Loss of crops and trees
Compensation for crops, trees, and other fixed assets at full replacement cost and should be sufficient to enable affected people to restore their standard of living after resettlement.
Sharecroppers: Not entitled to compensation for land, entitled to compensation for crops.
Annual (seasonal) crops: No compensation since the 3 or 6-month notice is supposed to allow people to harvest their annual crops.
Perennial crops: Cash compensation based upon rates per square meter /bush/tree/plant established at District level plus disturbance allowance (15% or 30%). Rates are calculated as the one-year net agricultural income. Disturbance allowance is meant to compensate the re-establishment period for these crops.
Gap.
Crops and temporary structures affected have been documented in this report and will be compensated. A disturbance allowance will be paid to overcome any time delays.
For perennial crops, compensation will be based on estimated income lost for 3 years, so as to provide replacement value. A disturbance allowance will be paid as per Uganda law.
Loss of structures and other improvements (fences, etc) including communal structures
Compensation for structures should cover full replacement cost exclusive of depreciation and inclusive of all fees (such as construction permits and title charges) and labour costs.
Owners of “Permanent” Buildings:Valuation by valuer + disturbance allowance (15%). Valuation is based on depreciated market value.
Walls: classed as permanent structures, but value calculated on investment method.
Owners of “Non-permanent” Buildings:Cash compensation based upon rates per square meter established at District level plus disturbance allowance (15%).
Note: Rates are based on depreciated market value.
Tenants of structures: repayment of unused rent, and 6 months notice to vacate structure.
Fences: barbed wire fences valued by government rate,
Gap.
Where affected project will provide compensation based on replacement value. This will include the payment of government valuation rates and payment of a disturbance allowance. However, no permanent structures are likely to be affected.
26
based on the investment method.
27
4. INSTITUTIONAL RESPONSIBILITIESIn implementing this resettlement action plan, three key stakeholders have been identified including the Ministry of Local Government, Ministry of Lands, Housing and Urban Development and REA.
4.1. Rural Electrification AgencyREA has a lean management structure comprising of four departments responsible for Project Planning, Project Monitoring & Evaluation, Public Information & Outreach, and Finance & Administration, respectively. The Agency has, in addition, positions of Internal Audit and Legal Services (reporting to the Board). An Environmental Officer has recently been recruited to address and ensure compliance to social and environmental safeguards. Therefore in implementing this RAP, this official will oversee the implementation with support from the Project Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation Unit. However, given its lean structure, a consultant is likely to implement the RAP
4.2. Ministry of Local Government The staff at the district level and sub county level is mandated to ensure that there are minimal disruptions in communities. The District Environment Officers, Community Development Officers and the Sub County Chiefs have been actively involved in the planning processes for this RAP. This is in line with the national policies and guidelines of the Government of Uganda and is done to ensure equitable compensation and minimize social disruptions or negative effects on people’s livelihoods arising from construction of roads. Compensations assist those who have lost assets as a result of a development project to maintain their livelihood through income restoration. Local Councils are responsible for local policy matters, economic development, resolving local conflicts and providing orderly leadership and democratic practices at the grass roots level in their respective areas. The system has facilitated mass participation in government affairs and awakened the rural population to their rights of citizenship and obligations particularly regarding involvement in development programs and projects. In the project-affected area LC1s and LC3s are very active and directly interact with the affected population. These councils will thus be helpful during identification of rightful property owners and resolving compensation grievances.
4.3. Ministry of Lands, Housing and Urban DevelopmentThe Chief Government Valuer in the Valuation Division in the Ministry of Housing and Urban Development is responsible for approving the Valuation Roll. This demands fair and transparent compensation and as such all property valued are first inspected by the Chief Government Valuer. Chief
28
Government Valuer’s office is also involved in resolving public complaints that arise from land acquisition valuations and compensation payments.
4.4. Related Line MinistriesThe Government of Uganda recognizes energy as a key input in all sectors. The implementation of rural electrification therefore, necessitated a multi-sectoral approach. The project design includes specific components for key sectors namely; Health, Education, Water, Local Government, Private Sector, Community Based Organizations and Financial Institutions.
4.4.1. Ministry of Energy and Mineral DevelopmentThe Minister of Energy and Mineral Development is the principal political head responsible for Electricity policy formulation, planning and development. The Ministry prepares the Energy Policy and Strategic Plans. The Minister appoints the members of the Rural Electrification Board. In the RAP implementation, REA will be guided by the scrotal polices and guidelines regarding compensation for affected persons.
4.4.2. Ministry of Agriculture, Animal Industry and FisheriesConsidering that most of affected items are trees and crops, the The Ministry of Agriculture, Animal Industry & Fisheries would be brought on board to help support livelihood restoration strategies. The agricultural modernization program (PMA and NAADS) could be used as opportunities for increasing incomes by raising farm productivity through use of appropriate energy. Additionally, the Energy for Rural Transformation (ERT) agricultural support component has identified key projects where energy is a major constraint like coffee, tea and fish processing; horticulture production, processing and marketing; dairy and poultry production. It is also developing subsidy guidelines. Rural Electrification Agency (REA) should provide the leadership for policy guidelines to ensure effective coordination and harmonization of incentive measures for Rural Electrification development in the country.
4.4.3. Ministry of HealthThe Ministry of Health is involved in energy projects targeting improvement of health institutions, diagnostic services/laboratory equipment, cold storage for blood and vaccines, water supply pumping and heating, communication, health education and data management. The strategy is to use electricity and other renewable sources of energy to improve energy efficiency and management in the health sector. Once again, Rural Electrification Agency (REA) is a major player in establishing demand trends and patterns and ensuring coordinated efforts.
4.4.4. Ministry of Education and SportsThe Ministry of Education & Sports, through its Department of Education Planning (DEP), is interested in rural electrification to facilitate improvement of the quality of education in rural areas and develop energy policy
29
guidelines for energy and Information Communication Technology (ICT) in post-primary education. A pilot phase is already underway in some 10 districts. Ministry of Education and Sports is, therefore, REA’s important client in terms of meeting the ministry’s expectations.
4.4.5. Ministry of Water, Lands and EnvironmentThe Ministry of Water, Lands & Environment’s Department of Water Development (DWD) aims to improve water supply services through adaptation of appropriate energy packages to water supply systems in small towns and rural growth centres. Fourteen towns are targeted under the pilot phase. Rural Electrification Agency (REA) has to encourage investment in small power projects to support realization of the vision of “water for all” within the shortest time possible.
4.4.6. Ministry of Works, Housing and CommunicationThe Ministry of Works, Housing & Communications is responsible for infrastructure policy and development including roads and communications, crucial for successful development of Rural Electrification. Ministry of Works, Housing & Communications also participates in the annual meetings of stakeholders.
4.4.7. Ministry of Finance, Planning and Economic DevelopmentThe Ministry of Finance, Planning & Economic Development is responsible for mobilization of development funds within the framework of the Poverty Eradication Action Plan (PEAP). Accordingly, the Poverty Monitoring and Analysis Unit in the ministry undertake regular Monitoring & Evaluation of Rural Electrification to assess the impact of the initiatives on the quality of life of the people. REA has to coordinate its Monitoring & Evaluation strategies and operations with the ministry.
4.5. Implementation ScheduleHaving assigned the different organizational responsibilities, this team anticipates that the RAP implementation is likely to cover a period of 13 months. The sequencing of activities bears in mind that some activities can be undertaken at the same time. Details are shown in the table below.
Table 2: RAP Implementation Schedule
Activities 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13RAP ApprovalRAP DisclosureAgreement with EntitlementsCompensation Payment
Contractor Begins work,
Grievance Management
RAP MonitoringCompletion Audit
30
31
5. COMPENSATION FRAMEWORK
This section is a presentation of the compensation framework that include a description of the compensation guidelines established by the Government of Uganda; the methodology used to value losses, the proposed types and levels of compensation to be paid, the compensation and assistance eligibility criteria and how the compensation will be paid.
5.1. Key Principles
The key principles committed upon by REA in this RAP are the following:- Resettlement and compensation of Project-Affected People (PAP) will
be carried out in compliance with Ugandan legislation, IFC’s Performance Standard 5 and WB OP 4.12,
- All physically or economically displaced people will be offered an option between either a full resettlement package, including the provision of replacement residential land and a house, or cash compensation,
- Past experience in Uganda has shown that cash compensation, although very sought after by many household heads, could be detrimental in the medium term, to other household members, particularly the females and children; the Project will make every effort to promote resettlement rather than cash compensation, and this plan is designed accordingly,
- The economies in the affected villages are largely agro-based and that most households are just beginning to restore their livelihoods after a war. Hence compensation measures have taken into account this vulnerability context,
- The RAP will be implemented in a gender-sensitive manner: consents of female spouses will be sought, as provided by Ugandan regulations,
- Given that REA works through partnerships with lead Government Ministries, the Agency will help link PAP’ that will help them in restoring their affected livelihoods, and will provide transitional assistance as necessary as long as livelihoods are not restored to their previous level; specific livelihood restoration activities will target women,
- The RAP implementation and outcomes will be monitored and evaluated as part of a transparent process,
- PAPs be informed and consulted during the whole course of RAP development, implementation and evaluation.
5.1.1. Compensation and Resettlement Packages
Information from the socio-economic survey and census guided the selection of the most appropriate compensation packages while bearing in mind the scenarios below.
32
5.1.1.1. The Affected Household Is Neither Physically Nor Economically Displaced
This means in practice that the remaining land is deemed economically viable and no residential building has to be removed. Such situations of rather benign impact apply to the overwhelming majority of affected households. In these cases, cash compensation will be offered and no resettlement option will be offered. Cash compensation will be at District Land Board rates for land, crops, and structures, with payment of disturbance allowance as per Ugandan regulations. An uplift will be added to this compensation to meet full replacement value requirements, as rates established by District Land Boards usually do not meet this requirement.
5.1.1.2. The Affected Household Is Physically Displaced but not Economically Affected
The construction of a replacement house will be offered wherever the residential building has to be removed or relocated nearby. Depending on situations, resettlement may involve the construction of a replacement house: - either on the remaining part of the plot if the remaining land holding in the neighborhood of the affected plot is deemed economically viable, or if the household’s livelihood is not based on agriculture, and if the affected household agrees to such a solution; in such cases, no replacement agricultural land will have to be provided and the household will simply continue to use the land they previously farmed or continue to engage in their non-agricultural activities, while dwelling in their new residence;- or on another resettlement plot if the remainder of the affected plot is not economically viable; in such situations, replacement agricultural land of similar potential will also have to be provided in the vicinity of the residential resettlement plot. Residential land will be provided to resettlers under secure tenure (either freehold or very long term leases), regardless of the previous regime of occupation. Agricultural land will be provided under the same regime of occupation as the land it replaces in the previous location.
5.1.1.3. The Affected Household Is Economically Displaced but not Physically Displaced
In such situations, the residential building of the affected household is not affected, but land take is such that their agricultural sustainability is jeopardized. In these situations, compensation will be provided through the provision of replacement agricultural land, with or without physical relocation of the homestead, depending on whether replacement land is available in the vicinity.
Given the nature of the development, situation 1 was selected as the most appropriate on the basis that although a 10 meter is needed to set up the way leave, the land owner can continue to utilize land under the way leave
33
for crops but not trees. No structures will be demolished but rather if found that some will be affected, the line will be diverted. Furthermore, while trees are not allowed under the wayleaves, cash compensation is proposed for trees and crops affected. Hence, cash compensation will be at District Land Board rates for land, crops, and structures, with payment of disturbance allowance as per Ugandan regulations.
5.2. Eligibility
The basis of valuation for compensation lies in the constitution of the Republic of Uganda 1995 and the Land Act 1998
The Constitution of the Republic of Uganda, 1995, Article 26
a.) Every person has a right to own property either individually or in association with others.
b.) No person shall be compulsorily deprived of property or any interest in or right over property of any description except where the following conditions are satisfied
a. The taking of possession or acquisition is necessary for public use or in the interest of defense, public safety, public order, public morality or public health; and
b. The compulsory taking of possession or acquisition of property is made under a law, which makes provision
i. Prompt payment of fair and adequate compensation, prior to the taking of possession or acquisition of the property; and
ii. A right of access to a court of law by any person who has an interest or right over the property.
The Land Act, 1998:a.) The District Land Tribunal shall, in assessing compensation referred to
in paragraph (b) of subsection (1) of section 77 take into account the following:-
a. In the case of a customary owner, the value of land shall be the Market Value of the unimproved land;
b. The value of the buildings, which shall be taken at Market Value in urban areas and Depreciated Replacement Cost in rural areas;
c. The value of standing crops on the land, excluding annual crops which could be harvested during the period of notice given to the owner, tenant or licence.
b.) In addition to compensation assessed under this section, there shall be paid as a Disturbance Allowance of fifteen per cent or if less that six months’ notice to give vacant possession is given, thirty present of any sum assessed under subsection (1) of this section.
34
c.) The rates set out in the list of District Compensation Rates referred to in paragraph (e) of subsection (1) of section 60 of this Act shall be used in determining the amount of compensation payable.
The crops, trees and other assets likely to be damaged affected recorded on compensation assessment were carefully analyzed and rates applied and computations made to determine the compensation payable to the PAPs. The handwritten information on the assessment form including the location of every individual PAP, entries of crops/trees and the rates applied were typed to produce schedules for the valuation report of the PAP study. These are the guiding principles and strategies used to establish what and who should qualify to be assessed for compensation payment:-
i. TORs emphasize physical identification, verification and valuation for compensation of properties to be affected/damaged by the construction of the power line and not acquisition of wayleaves.
ii. Valuation and assessment of properties to be based on approved area district compensation rates.
iii. Land and buildings to be left out except if considered adversely affected/damaged by the construction of the proposed power line.
iv. Trees in forests owned by government to be paid if claimed by individual complainants who have licenses/permits.
v. Complainants/Claimants to retain copy of the field assessment form.vi. Compensation Assessment to cover only crops and trees to be
destroyed/affected during the survey and construction of the power line
vii. Obtain consents from registered land owners and occupants in accordance with the law.
viii. Assess damage of destroyed crops/trees found in the road reserves such as fruit trees and perennial crops.
ix. Disturbance Allowance of 15% be allowed x. Prepare separate compensation assessment reports for the whole
proposed line route.
5.3. Rates Applied
Due to lack of Area Compensation Rates for newly created districts of Oyam and Kole, the consultant applied/used the current Area Compensation Rates of Gulu district to arrive at the compensation awards to the PAPs.
5.3.1. General Remarks and Assumptions
Inspection, survey and data capture of the affected property were carried out in the presence of the PAPs or their representatives, local leaders LCI officials of the villages and the neighbors. In urban centers where plots for building were genuinely affected by the proposed power line, assessment for
35
compensation was done on full value. Assessment of crops and economic trees was carried out using Gulu District Area Compensation Rates. In commercial forest assessment was limited to 10 meters wayleaves corridor and more trees may be affected during the construction of the power line. A Statutory Disturbance Allowance of 15% as been allowed. Details of assessment/valuation of every claimant’s properties have been provided in this report.
5.3.2. Cut-off Date
The date of the valuation/assessment is November 2010
5.3.3. Valuation Certificate
There are Eighty Four (84) affected villages, in Kole, Oyam and Gulu Districts. The total number of claimants is 1143 and the assessed total compensation is Shs.95,675,252/- (Ninety Five Million Six Hundred Seventy Five Thousand Two Hundred Fifty Two Thousand Shillings Only). A summary of affected crops and trees as well as the numbers of affected persons are presented in the table below.
Item Name of Village Number of Affected Persons
Value of crops/Trees
15% Dist Allowance
Total Compensation Award
1. Corner Mowlem 13 490,125 73,519 563,6442. Te-Okole 11 979,000 146,850 1,125,8503. Acero ‘A’ 11 195,500 29,325 224,8254. Alyat ‘A’ 4 115,500 17,325 132,8255. Alyat ‘B’ 17 600,000 90,000 690,0006. Acero ‘B’ 9 743,000 111,450 854,4507. Acero ‘A’ 10 125,500 18,825 144,3258. Ajaya 24 1,304,000 195,600 1,499,6009. Aguga ‘A’ 16 338,000 50,700 388,700
10. Alidi ‘A’ 3 1,196,000 179,400 1,375,40011. Ongor 33 1,982,775 297,416 2,280,19112. Atyeto ‘A’ 7 366,500 54,975 421,47513. Komcankweri 8 4,127,000 619,050 4,746,05014. Pip 3 218,000 32,700 250,70015. Iyanyi ‘A’ 5 157,000 23,550 180,55016. Iyanyi ‘B’ 8 448,000 67,200 515,20017. Obinga Omii 8 607,851 91,178 699,02918. Adyeda 7 321,680 48,252 369,93219. Anyalo 17 757,400 113,610 871,010
36
20. Odong Oyere 6 582,300 87,345 669,64521. Akaidebe ‘B’ 33 1,565,500 234,825 1,800,32522. Akaoidebe ‘A’ 3 1,798,000 269,700 2,067,70023. Alica 17 2,033,750 305,063 2,338,81324. Acan Koma 11 1,903,825 285,574 2,189,39925. Barmwony 14 1,782,500 267,375 2,049,87526. Barlye C 16 6,233,125 934,969 7,168,09427. Otwe 17 1,253,750 188,063 1,441,81328. Abongo Okere 8 1,467,326 220,099 1,687,42529. Aboloneno 43 1,374,000 206,100 1,580,10030. Awe Ikwo 36 1,650,500 247,575 1,898,07531. Dam Amalo 20 1,133,225 169,984 1,303,20932. Dam Apiny 10 879,000 131,850 1,010,85033. Lwala 8 746,500 111,975 858,47534. Alobo Lac 15 266,000 39,900 305,90035. Barcal 21 1,010,252 151,538 1,161,79036. Adak ‘B’ 12 515,500 77,325 592,82537. Adak ‘A’ 33 2,023,750 303,563 2,327,31338. Alyec 10 1,977,000 296,550 2,273,55039. Twocan Ikweri 4 137,000 20,550 157,55040. Cekwere 7 341,500 51,225 392,72541. Corner Atapara 14 1,588,138 238,221 1,826,35942. Abuli 9 450,825 67,624 518,44943. Awelo Makweri 28 1,919,525 287,929 2,207,45444. Oketo Bito 4 2,772,000 415,800 3,187,80045. Awaripiny 11 473,288 70,993 544,28146. Okarawok 17 1,038,500 155,775 1,194,27547. Arok 6 136,250 20,438 156,68848. Dog Abam 2 211,000 31,650 242,65049. Amukugungu 5 235,500 35,325 270,82550. Kamdini town 19 1,310,500 196,575 1,507,07551. Abanya ‘B’ 5 339,500 50,925 390,42552. Abanya ‘A’ 18 1,043,800 156,570 1,200,37053. Alyec 21 1,974,500 296,175 2,270,67554. Pukica 8 261,000 39,150 300,15055. Boroboro ‘B’ 9 366,500 54,975 421,47556. Boroboro ‘A’ 9 221,000 33,150 254,15057. Barolimo 6 132,000 19,800 151,80058. Aruku Long 6 352,000 52,800 404,80059. Abang Trading 17 565,163 84,774 649,937
37
centre60. Abako 10 251,788 37,768 289,55661. Amwa trading
centre36 2,049,375 307,406 2,356,781
62. Amwa Headquarters
17 681,118 102,168 783,286
63. Waring 17 439,200 65,880 505,08064. Opati ‘B’ 2 224,000 33,600 257,60065. Opati ‘A’ 5 243,000 36,450 279,45066. Lango 14 395,250 59,288 454,53867. Bobi 12 1,081,875 162,281 1,244,15668. Teyao 3 68,650 10,298 78,94869. Omolo 13 925,188 138,778 1,063,96670. Alati ‘A’ 9 218,893 32,834 251,72771. Arak East 22 1,195,000 179,250 1,374,25072. Odyanyo 1 4,000 600 4,60073. Akuki East 29 1,053,804 158,071 1,211,87574. Alolekwe 3 167,113 25,067 192,18075. Ngutcati 19 910,926 136,639 1,047,56576. Coo Pe Bwone 2 2,089,875 313,481 2,403,35677. Centre ‘B’ 15 1,090,786 163,618 1,254,40478. Minakulu
trading centre40 1,321,500 198,225 1,519,725
79. Aromonyongo 22 3,740,500 561,075 4,301,57580. Idipo 20 1,011,875 151,781 1,163,65681. Obalowat 12 130,428 19,564 149,99282. Awii Mon Ward 14 683,903 102,585 786,48883. Kulu Otit 18 1,201,300 180,195 1,381,49584. Pato trading
centre16 878,401 131,760 1,010,161
1143 878401 12,479,381 3328136
38
6. RESETTLEMENT ASSISTANCE AND RESTORATION OF LIVELIHOODS
Wherever possible, the Government of Uganda tries to avoid or minimize the displacement of people by exploring alternative project designs The Rural Electriction Agency guided by the Wayleaves Act, provides for realignment of power lines in order to minimize displacement of households or businesses. International guidelines like the IFC recommends that project sponsors undertake the following actions on behalf of all affected people, including members of the host communities in which displaced people will be settled:
6.1. Livelihood Restoration StrategiesThe livelihood restoration strategies proposed, aim at increasing participation of all stakeholders so that affected persons do not become more vulnerable. Hence this team has undertaken the following in order to ensure that affected persons are not significantly affected.
a.) The team informed affected people of their options and rights concerning resettlement;
b.) Provided technically and economically feasible options for resettlement based on consultation with affected people and assessment of resettlement alternatives;
c.)Given that no physical relocation is required, the team has not provided affected people with prompt and effective compensation at full replacement value for loss of assets due to project activities; but only compensation for crops;
d.) Since no physical relocation is necessary, disturbance allowance has been factored in the compensation package
e.) It is recommended therefore, that where necessary, affected persons be linked to other projects that can provide them with development assistance in addition to compensation for lost assets described above such as land preparation, agricultural inputs, and credit facilities and for training and employment opportunities.
6.2. Special Assistance for Women and Vulnerable Groups
The Resettlement Planning team identifies this as the most appropriate option for resettlement assistance and livelihood restoration given that although women form a small percentage of the affected households, the nature of tenure agreements in Northern Uganda that is customary in nature makes women more vulnerable to access to productive resources. As a result women tend to suffer more than men as a result of social changes. Therefore throughout the development of this RAP some of the immediate and practical measures are proposed to improve women’s adaptation to resettlement including:
39
ensuring that land titles and compensation entitlements are issued in the name of both spouses;
reducing women’s workloads by providing, for example, standpipes, hand pumps, grinding mills, woodlots, fuel efficient stoves, ox carts, and plows by linking them to other projects like NUSAF, NAADS, LGSMD that are implementing such activities;
improving health services by providing training for village midwives, primary health care centers, child spacing/family planning counseling, clean water supply, and sanitation training by linking them to development partners in specific locations;
improving family services by providing immunizations; and Increasing incomes by setting up credit groups, skills training, and
access to markets.
40
7. PUBLIC CONSULTATION, PARTICIPATION AND DEVELOPMENT PLANNING
Considering that the project has both environmental and social impacts, consultation was not a single conversation but a series of opportunities to create understanding about the project among those it has affected or and those it is likely to affect or interest, and to learn how these external parties view the project and its attendant risks, impacts, opportunities, and mitigation measures. Listening to stakeholder concerns and feedback gave the team valuable source of information that can improve project design and outcomes and help a company to identify and control external risks. It can also form the basis for future collaboration and partnerships. For stakeholders, a company’s consultation process is an opportunity to get information, as well as to educate company staff about the local context in which a project will take place, to raise issues and concerns, ask questions, and potentially help shape the project by making suggestions for the company to consider and respond to.
7.1. Community Perceptions of the Project
Generally, most communities that were consulted were happy with the proposed project. They noted that some of the villages were previously connected to power but the facilities got vandalized during the war. It was observed that most of the trading centres had the potential to grow like Corner Mowlem but this was hampered by no power in the area. Most communities wondered when the actual work would begin given the need for power in schools, health centres and other related infrastructure including the trading centre.
7.2. Community Concerns7.2.1. Impact on Property and Cultural Sites
Aside from the development, local leaders urged the team to compensate affected persons given that they were still restoring their livelihoods. Some community members were concerned about the impact of the power line on cemeteries and graveyards. However, they were informed that REA was going to use the road reserve so their areas will not be heavily affected. In addition to this community members raised concerns regarding payment for the crops destroyed, and were informed on the crops that would be identified during the census and valued. However, there was need for PAPs to cooperate with the team so that the identification process was undertaken in a participatory manner including affected persons and their leaders as witnesses. Furthermore, community members wondered whether there would be any impact on structures and whether property would be lost. The team allayed these fears noting that since most of the work would be done in the road reserve, it was unlikely that any structure would be
41
affected. Another community member wondered what he would do if he wanted to build on his land that already has a pole. For safety concerns, he was advised to construct 15meters from the pole and for others who wished that a mango should not be cut down but rather pruned, they were advised that trees were not allowed under the wayleaves and would have to be compensated.
7.2.2. Compensation Framework
On the compensation framework, one community member wondered whether compensation rates were negotiable suggesting that previous rates that have been found to be unfavorable. However, members were informed that some items like trees and poles for fences are fixed based on the district compensation rates generated by District Land Board. The compensation rates are updated every year to address price changes and inflation issues. Others wondered what the method of compensation would be adopted. They are informed that the results from the socio-economic survey and census would serve as an input in the method of compensation though cash compensation has been found to be the preferred option by most PAPs.
7.2.3. Community Benefits
Other concerns were relating to access to the power including whether they would be given a transformer or whether they would get security lights in their areas. Furthermore, community members wondered whether community infrastructure close to the line would be connected to the power line will pass nearby their school (primary) will government give the primary school power. They were informed that after the installation, the facility would be given to the relevant authorities that would ably meet these needs. Community members wondered whether they will be given work to help in putting up the power line and were informed that should transmission come, employment opportunities would be availed where need. Members suggested that some of the opportunities that they should benefit from include cutting of trees, clearing of land and digging holes.
7.2.4. Community Health and SafetyRegarding community health and safety, one community member wondered whether if a pole fells and killed someone what would Government compensate the affected one. The team informed members that there are laws that address issues of workers’ compensation and these are planned for in the Environmental and Social Management Plan. The contractor is mandated to comply with provision of working gear that protects the lives of the workforce.
7.2.5. Grievance Mechanism42
On grievances, one community member narrated that previous power line planners did not compensate them for the crops lost and wondered what procedure they should use in case they have complaints. Considering that there is no structure at the moment, they were advised to inform or report this to the RDC. However, a grievance mechanism has been recommended in this report to manage the grievance process.
8. GRIEVANCE MECHANISM
Regardless of its scale, involuntary resettlement inevitably gives rise to grievances among the affected population over issues ranging from rates of compensation and eligibility criteria to the location of resettlement sites and the quality of services at those sites. Timely redress of such grievances is vital to the satisfactory implementation of resettlement and to completion of the project on schedule. There is need to ensure that procedures are in place to allow affected people to lodge a complaint or a claim (including claims that derive from customary law and usage) without cost and with the assurance of a timely and satisfactory resolution of that complaint or claim.
In addition, the project may have to make special accommodations for women and members of vulnerable groups to ensure that they have equal access to grievance redress procedures. Such accommodation may include employment of women or members of vulnerable groups to facilitate the grievance redress process or to ensure that group representing the interests of women and other vulnerable groups take part in the process.
8.1. Mechanisms of Grievance and AppealsIn this regard, this resettlement planning team proposes that grievances are best redressed through project management, local government staff, political leadership and customary leaders. The traditional mechanisms for conflict resolution in the Acholi region have been widely used in providing psychosocial support for post conflict process management.
8.1.1. Reconciliatory ProcedureThis is an informal mechanism that will be applied to reach a resolution whenever minor contradictions and disagreements that may occur. It will include and oral or written appeal to the community based conflict resolution structure constituting of 1 member of the RAP implementation team (consultant), Sub County Chief/Community Development Officer, one Political Leader, 2 Elders and I religious leader. In order to build credibility of the commission, it is important that it includes different stakeholders that bring on board agreed principles and values that are attached to the Acholi Region. This approach is a mutual coordination mechanism to guarantee that mutual interests are served and disputes and contradictions are solved.
43
8.1.2. Written Complaints to REAWhen the complainant is dissatisfied and feels that a member of the RAP implementation unit in the community has infringed upon his legal rights and interests or is dissatisfied with the decision made he or she can write to the REA to lodge a written complaint. This complaint should be addressed within two weeks of receipt.
8.1.3. Legal RedressIf the complainant feels dissatisfied with the administrative arbitration decision by the REA under the supervision of the Environmental and Social Safeguards officer, the complainant will then seek legal redress in courts of law. If the complainant is not satisfied with the decision made above, he or she may logde an appeal to the civil court and an independent will be set up to supervise and inspect the compensation process.
8.2. Public DisclosureProject Affected persons will be informed of this mechanism during the RAP disclosure for their input and refinement so that they can fully understand their rights for grievance and appeal. When grievance and appeal happen, the related institutions including Village committee, REA should keep good record about it, and make it available to the external monitor for inspection and verification.
44
9. MONITORING, EVALUTION AND REPORTING FRAMEWORK
The purpose of monitoring and evaluation for this RAP will be to report about the effectiveness of the implementation of the RAP, covering resettlement, disbursement of compensation and effectiveness of public involvement, amongst others. Monitoring and purposeful evaluation will be key factors for successful resettlement activities. Monitoring will also entail evaluation of effectiveness of the grievance management process. The monitoring Framework proposed in this RAP includes a review of financial disbursements, compensation complaints and grievance redress, adherence to compensation payment schedule, support of vulnerable PAPs.
The Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) mechanism provides a basis to assess overall success and effectiveness of various resettlement processes and measures. This mechanism is based on two components:
a) Internal monitoring – undertaken by the implementation unit / Monitoring Officer in the Planning Department of REA; and,
b) External evaluations –by development partners, community development officers and/or environmental focal persons at district level and other national stakeholders.
9.1. Internal monitoring processThe specific objectives and tasks of the internal monitoring process include: a.) identification of suitable indicators; b.) Measurement of indicators at appropriate intervals; c.) creation of a mechanism to analyze M&E data against a pre-resettlement baseline; and d.) Setting up a system to regularly respond to M&E findings by adapting existing measures or by modifying implementation processes. This monitoring process will be used to analyze progress and change at regular intervals. It shall be linked to the various stages of the RAP, as follows:-
9.1.1. During resettlement
During resettlement, M&E should focus on resettlement issues such as:
Number of families that have been compensated; Number of people who have acquired legal papers to new property, Number of business owners who have restored their businesses, Efficiency and effectiveness of grievance redress mechanism.
45
9.1.2. After resettlement
Post resettlement monitoring should focus on rehabilitation issues and status on each of the measures should be assessed, for example: Success level of restoration of livelihoods Success level of restoration of assets Efficiency and effectiveness of grievance redress mechanism.
9.1.3. Key Activities and Responsibilities i) Set up a system: The RAP implementation team will provide a
monitoring form to be completed monthly by the M&E officer at each sub-county. The forms will cover aspects in Section 10.1.1 above. The information collected will be entered in an existing database at REA for further analysis and compilation into quarterly reports.
ii) Ongoing Monitoring: The M&E Officer for each location will be in-charge of regular monitoring of the implementation process. This will involve:
a) Feedback and inputs from the Implementation Officers.b) Reviewing of the resettlement database.c) Receiving reports from Grievance Officer and of the grievance
database.d) Receiving information from local representatives.e) Direct consultation with the resettled community at each
location.iii) Monthly reports: Consolidated monthly reports with key findings
from the on-going monitoring should be submitted to the implementation team and discussed every month and action points determined. This monthly progress review should aim to ensure that important issues are immediately rectified.
iv) Vulnerability assessment: It is essential that vulnerability is closely monitored in order to provide timely support to susceptible households. A vulnerability assessment shall occur as part of quarterly auditing of all households, and those households that are most vulnerable shall be prioritized for monthly auditing and targeted assistance. This may be undertaken by the implementation Officer. Key activities are:
a) Develop a set of criteria to identify vulnerable households (Note that this is intended to act as a guideline only and should be modified as appropriate).
b) Every three months visit vulnerable households to assess key needs/ issues (e.g. unemployment) with the rehabilitation process.
c) Develop a plan to address these issues in conjunction with the members of the household.
46
9.2. External Evaluation ProcessIn addition to the internal monitoring process, external assessment of the resettlement process should be undertaken through an external evaluation agency appointed by REA. The external evaluation process will be informed by internal monitoring reports prepared by REA, and also through independent surveys and consultation conducted by the evaluation agency. The evaluation system will be based on process and outcome indicators.
9.2.1. Process IndicatorsProcess indicators measure effectiveness of processes (consultation, grievance) and inputs like people, equipment and materials and identify areas where improvements to existing processes are required. These may include the following:
Transparency of the implementation process. Adequacy of staff and capacity of the implementation agencies. Compliance of the resettlement process with Ugandan law and
World Bank standards. Effectiveness of the Grievance Process. Adequacy and effectiveness of public involvement. Effectiveness of the internal monitoring mechanism.
9.2.2. Outcome IndicatorsOutcome indicators will assess effectiveness of the resettlement and changes that have occurred to the communities’ standard of living. Key indicators are outlined in Table below.
Table 3: Monitoring indicators during resettlementCategory Indicator
Fund disbursement
Number of PAPs paid Amount of money disbursed Number of PAPs not paid in prescribed time (respective quarter) Reasons for not paying PAPs who are due for payment Projected disbursements in the next quarter
Restoration of and assets livelihoods
Number of PAPs who have benefited from related entrepreneurial training Number of businesses restored Reasons for not re-establishing businesses Number of NGOs that have been linked to PAPs
Public involvement
Number of community level meetings Participation rates of local leaders and community in resettlement process
disaggregated by genderGrievance management
Number of grievances received Number of grievances resolved (at what level) Number of complaints reported to other government oversight bodies and outcomes
including how grievance was resolved Number of grievances refereed to Uganda Courts of Law Number of outstanding grievances and reasons for not resolving them
Custody of legal documents
Land title deeds received Land title returned to owners
Resettlement of vulnerable PAPs
Number of vulnerable PAPs resettled Kind of special assistance provided
47
9.2.3. Key activities and responsibilities REA will liaise with relevant ministries (MoLGD, MAAIF, MoFPED, Development partners) to undertake external evaluation of resettlement mid-term and at end of resettlement. These evaluations will focus on reviewing the process to-date and making necessary recommendations for modification to existing rehabilitation measures and other processes (e.g. grievance). This will allow modifications to the process and design packages that would help improve the effectiveness of REA in implementing the RAP. Considering that socio-economic baseline information is included in this report, a socio-economic survey at the external evaluation is necessary in order to assess the impact of the resettlement exercise.
9.3. RAP completion report During RAP implementation the consultant will submit to REA quarterly progress reports, after completion of resettlement, a final report will be submitted by REA prior to preparation of the project implementation report. The report shall indicate effectiveness of project implementation and disbursement of compensation payments, effectiveness of public consultations and socio-economic impacts of the road on roadside communities. This report will give overall assessment of the RAP process indicating activities undertaken, success of mitigation action ns and monitoring and well as useful lessons learnt.
9.4. Completion AuditA key aim of resettlement is to ensure compensation and other mitigation measures restore or enhance affected people’s quality of life and income levels. If affected PAPs quality of life can be demonstrated to have been restored, the resettlement and compensation process can be deemed “complete”. The purpose of Completion Audit will therefore be to establish whether REA implemented all activities needed to ensure compliance proposed resettlement commitments and applicable national and international policies. Specifically, the completion audit will be based on progress indicators and on outcome evaluation indicators and shall aim to assess whether compensation for all impacts of all affected people was undertaken; whether timely delivery of entitlements and compliance with Uganda’s and international resettlement requirements was undertaken; whether compensation frameworks were developed and implemented in a fair and transparent manner and adequate attention made to mitigating social impacts; and whether livelihoods have been restored.
48
ANNEXES
49
ANNEX 1: DETAILED LIST OF AFFECTED PERSONS
75KM AYER-KAMDINI AND BOBI-MINAKULU 33KV POWER LINE PROJECTVALUATION AND COMPENSATION ASSESSMENT REPORT
Item Name of Claimant Value of
crops/Trees
15% Dist Allowanc
e
Total Assessed
Compensation
ABOKE SUBCOUNTY CORNER MOWLEM
REA/AKBM/001 Lango Organic 30,000
4,500
34,500
REA/AKBM/002 Alele 50,000
7,500
57,500
REA/AKBM/003 Ekora William 97,000
14,550
111,550
REA/AKBM/004 Lokori Tom 59,375 8,906
68,281
REA/AKBM/005 Christine Lukeri 13,000
1,950
14,950
REA/AKBM/006 Obong Peter 71,875 10,781
82,656
REA/AKBM/007 Obong Peter 4,500
675
5,175
REA/AKBM/008 Okecha Sam 21,250
3,188
24,438
REA/AKBM/009 Evlyne Okecha Sam 1,125
169
1,294
REA/AKBM/010 Olugu Joel 2,000
300
2,300
REA/AKBM/011 Ogola Ray 25,000
3,750
28,750
REA/AKBM/012 Judith Okello Patrick 108,000
16,200
124,200
REA/AKBM/013 Olwata Lawrence 7,000
1,050
8,050
TE-OKOLEREA/AKBM/014 Omara Caroline
164,000 24,60
0 188,60
0
REA/AKBM/015 Ogwal Sam 9,000
1,350
10,350
REA/AKBM/016 Sylfo Akello 7,000
1,050
8,050
50
REA/AKBM/017 Acen Stella 281,000
42,150
323,150
REA/AKBM/018 Awino Mary 6,000
900
6,900
REA/AKBM/019 Joseph Opio Odongo 60,500
9,075
69,575
REA/AKBM/020 Opio Jimmy 80,000
12,000
92,000
REA/AKBM/021 Ajok Hellen 235,000
35,250
270,250
REA/AKBM/022 Onapa Parick 91,000
13,650
104,650
REA/AKBM/023 Okello Lawrence 20,500
3,075
23,575
REA/AKBM/024 Ekwaro Ambrose 25,000
3,750
28,750
ACERO 'A'REA/AKBM/025 Omara Jasper
6,000 90
0 6,90
0
REA/AKBM/026 Omara Francis 4,000
600
4,600
REA/AKBM/027 Phobe Okello Dick 5,000
750
5,750
REA/AKBM/028 Francis Ogwang 1,000
150
1,150
REA/AKBM/029 Okello Fred 50,000
7,500
57,500
REA/AKBM/030 Ocen James 25,000
3,750
28,750
REA/AKBM/031 Okello T. and Topachu J.
50,000
7,500
57,500
REA/AKBM/032 Topachu James 12,500
1,875
14,375
REA/AKBM/033 Omara David 7,000
1,050
8,050
REA/AKBM/034 Ongom Tabu 10,000
1,500
11,500
REA/AKBM/035 Owaca J. and kello T. 25,000
3,750
28,750
ALYAT 'A'REA/AKBM/036 Ogwang Richard A.
25,000 3,75
0 28,75
0
51
REA/AKBM/037 Omara Francis 10,000
1,500
11,500
REA/AKBM/038 Opio William Nickson 39,000
5,850
44,850
REA/AKBM/039 Omara Jimmy Angulu 41,500
6,225
47,725
ALYAT 'B'REA/AKBM/040 Oyar Vicent
11,500 1,72
5 13,22
5
REA/AKBM/041 Agony Vento 10,000
1,500
11,500
REA/AKBM/042 Ocen Joseph 1,000
150
1,150
REA/AKBM/043 Late Akedo N. c/o Okello Martin
1,000
150
1,150
REA/AKBM/044 Opio Selestino 94,000
14,100
108,100
REA/AKBM/045 Oming Charlse 3,000
450
3,450
REA/AKBM/046 Namm Isaac 41,000
6,150
47,150
REA/AKBM/047 Okullo Richard 95,000
14,250
109,250
REA/AKBM/048 Ogwang Nelson 90,500
13,575
104,075
REA/AKBM/049 Rose Engole 6,000
900
6,900
REA/AKBM/050 Otyang Denis 51,000
7,650
58,650
REA/AKBM/051 Omodi Yubentino 25,500
3,825
29,325
REA/AKBM/052 Ebong Patrick 85,000
12,750
97,750
REA/AKBM/053 Docus Omara 57,000
8,550
65,550
REA/AKBM/054 Ocato John 4,000
600
4,600
REA/AKBM/055 Okello Lawrence 2,000
300
2,300
REA/AKBM/056 Ocen Leonard 22,500
3,375
25,875
LORO SUBCOUNTY52
ACERO 'B'REA/AKBM/057 Odong Alex
36,000 5,40
0 41,40
0
REA/AKBM/058 Opat Jimmy 55,000
8,250
63,250
REA/AKBM/059 Okullo Geofrey 47,000
7,050
54,050
REA/AKBM/060 Okello Kizito 21,000
3,150
24,150
REA/AKBM/061 Otur Robert 65,000
9,750
74,750
REA/AKBM/062 Ogwang Martin 95,000
14,250
109,250
REA/AKBM/063 Odung Geofrey 313,000
46,950
359,950
REA/AKBM/064 Iyit Francis 51,000
7,650
58,650
REA/AKBM/065 Oginya Odinga 60,000
9,000
69,000
ACERO 'A'REA/AKBM/066 Arit John
1,000 15
0 1,15
0
REA/AKBM/067 Ocen Tom 19,000
2,850
21,850
REA/AKBM/068 Ogwang Robert 4,000
600
4,600
REA/AKBM/069 Ayela Robert 14,000
2,100
16,100
REA/AKBM/070 Okello David 38,000
5,700
43,700
REA/AKBM/071 Akullu Milly 8,000
1,200
9,200
REA/AKBM/072 Ekol Moris 4,500
675
5,175
REA/AKBM/073 Tile Francis 4,500
675
5,175
REA/AKBM/074 Arit John 1,000
150
1,150
REA/AKBM/075 Obua Alfred 31,500
4,725
36,225
53
AJAYAREA/AKBM/076 Otim George
7,000 1,05
0 8,05
0
REA/AKBM/077 Lenga Richard 43,500
6,525
50,025
REA/AKBM/078 Lenga Evaster 53,000
7,950
60,950
REA/AKBM/079 Next to Ocen and Okot 65,000
9,750
74,750
REA/AKBM/080 Okot Y.Y. 138,000
20,700
158,700
REA/AKBM/081 Ogwang Bosco 40,000
6,000
46,000
REA/AKBM/082 Ayo Denis 25,000
3,750
28,750
REA/AKBM/083 Opio Moses 20,000
3,000
23,000
REA/AKBM/084 Hellen Opio 60,000
9,000
69,000
REA/AKBM/085 Ogwang David 5,000
750
5,750
REA/AKBM/086 Ocen Patrick 10,000
1,500
11,500
REA/AKBM/087 Owuni Richard 40,000
6,000
46,000
REA/AKBM/088 Opio Albino 40,000
6,000
46,000
REA/AKBM/089 Florence Oyat 20,000
3,000
23,000
REA/AKBM/090 Ocen Cipriano 30,000
4,500
34,500
REA/AKBM/091 Obua Denis 25,000
3,750
28,750
REA/AKBM/092 Obote Lawrence 180,000
27,000
207,000
REA/AKBM/093 Odongo Charlse 20,000
3,000
23,000
REA/AKBM/094 Rose Okello 36,000
5,400
41,400
REA/AKBM/095 Gira John 10,000
1,500
11,500
54
REA/AKBM/096 Okeny Vicent 73,000
10,950
83,950
REA/AKBM/097 Ojok Benson 147,000
22,050
169,050
REA/AKBM/098 Okello Alice 105,500
15,825
121,325
REA/AKBM/099 Lucy Olet 111,000
16,650
127,650
AGUGA 'A'REA/AKBM/100 Owiny Tito
10,000 1,50
0 11,50
0
REA/AKBM/101 Omara Kosia 50,000
7,500
57,500
REA/AKBM/102 Munu Denis Kalulu 1,000
150
1,150
REA/AKBM/103 Odyek Jonan 7,000
1,050
8,050
REA/AKBM/104 Okullo James 5,000
750
5,750
REA/AKBM/105 Ananga James 3,000
450
3,450
REA/AKBM/106 Omara Denis 5,000
750
5,750
REA/AKBM/107 Y.B Okello 25,000
3,750
28,750
REA/AKBM/108 Ekii Newton 29,000
4,350
33,350
REA/AKBM/109 Ongom Engenio 4,000
600
4,600
REA/AKBM/110 Okoya Jasper 5,000
750
5,750
REA/AKBM/111 Obong George 30,000
4,500
34,500
REA/AKBM/112 Okullo David 85,000
12,750
97,750
REA/AKBM/113 Ocen George 55,000
8,250
63,250
REA/AKBM/114 Okuku Anthony 14,000
2,100
16,100
REA/AKBM/115 Etenyu Emmanuel 10,000
1,500
11,500
55
ALIDI 'A'REA/AKBM/116 Alidi Primary School
1,176,000 176,40
0 1,352,40
0
REA/AKBM/117 Odongo Bonny 10,000
1,500
11,500
REA/AKBM/118 Omara Bosco 10,000
1,500
11,500
ONGOR
REA/AKBM/119 Okot Peter 44,000
6,600
50,600
REA/AKBM/120 Ojok William 342,565 51,385
393,950
REA/AKBM/121 Amuku Ambrose 61,550
9,233
70,783
REA/AKBM/122 Geofrey Ojok Newton 13,000
1,950
14,950
REA/AKBM/123 Oyar Martin 150,460
22,569
173,029
REA/AKBM/124 Rezabwani Otyang 135,700
20,355
156,055
REA/AKBM/125 Bongo Daniel 253,000
37,950
290,950
REA/AKBM/126 Grace Odyek 123,500
18,525
142,025
REA/AKBM/127 Okoo Alfred 21,000
3,150
24,150
REA/AKBM/128 Amuku Patrick 15,500
2,325
17,825
REA/AKBM/129 Omara Patrick 43,500
6,525
50,025
REA/AKBM/130 Elen Benson 10,000
1,500
11,500
REA/AKBM/131 Obong John 106,000
15,900
121,900
REA/AKBM/132 Abur Sylvia Otyang 106,000
15,900
121,900
REA/AKBM/133 Ojede Benson 46,000
6,900
52,900
REA/AKBM/134 Omara Jimmy 48,000
7,200
55,200
56
REA/AKBM/135 Olila Charlse 5,000
750
5,750
REA/AKBM/136 Opio Nickson 10,000
1,500
11,500
REA/AKBM/137 Okello Alfred 66,000
9,900
75,900
REA/AKBM/138 Ojede Milton 12,000
1,800
13,800
REA/AKBM/139 Okello Vicent 2,000
300
2,300
REA/AKBM/140 Odongo Jonan 60,000
9,000
69,000
REA/AKBM/141 Okullo David 50,000
7,500
57,500
REA/AKBM/142 Awany Paspiko 50,000
7,500
57,500
REA/AKBM/143 Owiny John Alfonse 62,000
9,300
71,300
REA/AKBM/144 Okello Vicent 20,000
3,000
23,000
REA/AKBM/145 Okello Wilfred 32,000
4,800
36,800
REA/AKBM/146 Doi (Prison Officer) 2,000
300
2,300
REA/AKBM/147 Opio (Builder) 1,000
150
1,150
REA/AKBM/148 Luzino Opiny 40,000
6,000
46,000
REA/AKBM/149 Odong Quintino 41,000
6,150
47,150
REA/AKBM/150 Ogwal 2,000
300
2,300
REA/AKBM/151 Odyek Tony C/o Okori Sam
8,000
1,200
9,200
ATYETO 'A'
REA/AKBM/152 Omara Emmy 10,000
1,500
11,500
REA/AKBM/153 Otyang George 10,000
1,500
11,500
57
REA/AKBM/154 Ongol Moses 16,000
2,400
18,400
REA/AKBM/155 Opio Tony 20,000
3,000
23,000
REA/AKBM/156 Ongol Moses 150,000
22,500
172,500
REA/AKBM/157 Okello Peter Odyek 70,500
10,575
81,075
REA/AKBM/158 Geofrey Okello Opio 90,000
13,500
103,500
KOMCANIKWERIREA/AKBM/159 Omor Charlse
3,019,000 452,85
0 3,471,85
0
REA/AKBM/160 Oboo Emmanuel 15,000
2,250
17,250
REA/AKBM/161 Aida Okedi 8,000
1,200
9,200
REA/AKBM/162 Omor Charlse 978,000
146,700
1,124,700
REA/AKBM/163 Okeng Moses 5,000
750
5,750
REA/AKBM/164 Oleke Dickens 51,000
7,650
58,650
REA/AKBM/165 Omara Augustine 50,000
7,500
57,500
REA/AKBM/166 Bua Bosco 1,000
150
1,150
PIP
REA/AKBM/167 Odongo Denis 25,000
3,750
28,750
REA/AKBM/168 Iyanyi Primary School 141,000
21,150
162,150
REA/AKBM/169 Rev. Omara Francis 52,000
7,800
59,800
IYANYI 'A'REA/AKBM/170 Opio Denis
40,000 6,00
0 46,00
0
REA/AKBM/171 Okello Moris 2,000
300
2,300
58
REA/AKBM/172 Abule Francis 20,000
3,000
23,000
REA/AKBM/173 Ogwal James 25,000
3,750
28,750
REA/AKBM/174 Ogwal J.B. 70,000
10,500
80,500
IYANYI 'B'
REA/AKBM/175 Odongo Bosco 20,000
3,000
23,000
REA/AKBM/176 Okello Peter 40,000
6,000
46,000
REA/AKBM/177 Olila Francis 17,000
2,550
19,550
REA/AKBM/178 Ameny Richard 12,000
1,800
13,800
REA/AKBM/179 Olobo George 32,000
4,800
36,800
REA/AKBM/180 Anam Silvesto 30,000
4,500
34,500
REA/AKBM/181 Obua Denis 197,000
29,550
226,550
REA/AKBM/182 Okello Denis 100,000
15,000
115,000
OBANGA OMII
REA/AKBM/183 Ngole William 4,000
600
4,600
REA/AKBM/184 Ogal Jonan 22,000
3,300
25,300
REA/AKBM/185 Ongom Beatrice 58,538 8,781
67,319
REA/AKBM/186 Omara Nickson 54,563 8,184
62,747
REA/AKBM/187 Okello Nelson 78,000
11,700
89,700
REA/AKBM/188 Odyek Geofrey 3,000
450
3,450
REA/AKBM/189 Ocen Nickodemus 64,750
9,713
74,463
REA/AKBM/190 Ongom Peter Jenty 323,000
48,450
371,450
59
ADYEDAREA/AKBM/191 Corina Odyek
156,000 23,40
0 179,40
0
REA/AKBM/192 Ogwang Nelson 88,680
13,302
101,982
REA/AKBM/193 Ogwal Christopher 11,000
1,650
12,650
REA/AKBM/194 Odongo Alex 10,000
1,500
11,500
REA/AKBM/195 Ogwal Emmanuel 4,000
600
4,600
REA/AKBM/196 Okello Charlse 10,000
1,500
11,500
REA/AKBM/197 Okello Alfred 42,000
6,300
48,300
ANYALO
REA/AKBM/198 Olugu James 60,000
9,000
69,000
REA/AKBM/199 Onapa Omara 7,000
1,050
8,050
REA/AKBM/200 Ongom Stephen 76,000
11,400
87,400
REA/AKBM/201 Otim Matiya 31,000
4,650
35,650
REA/AKBM/202 Agen John 90,000
13,500
103,500
REA/AKBM/203 Akaki Simon 7,000
1,050
8,050
REA/AKBM/204 Ogwang Moses 10,000
1,500
11,500
REA/AKBM/205 Next to Ogwang Moses 30,000
4,500
34,500
REA/AKBM/206 Obong William 60,000
9,000
69,000
REA/AKBM/207 Moro Jasper 20,000
3,000
23,000
REA/AKBM/208 Lama George 87,000
13,050
100,050
REA/AKBM/209 Okello John 10,000
1,500
11,500
60
REA/AKBM/210 Odongo Dick 25,000
3,750
28,750
REA/AKBM/211 Igach Godfrey 40,000
6,000
46,000
REA/AKBM/212 Omara Godfrey 10,000
1,500
11,500
REA/AKBM/213 Olugu James 124,400
18,660
143,060
REA/AKBM/214 Alip Joseph 70,000
10,500
80,500
ODONG OYERE
REA/AKBM/215 Farmer Field School 76,800
11,520
88,320
REA/AKBM/216 Olobo Geofrey 210,500
31,575
242,075
REA/AKBM/217 Erike Willy 10,000
1,500
11,500
REA/AKBM/218 Adenge Alterio 185,000
27,750
212,750
REA/AKBM/219 Odyeny Richard 7,500
1,125
8,625
REA/AKBM/220 Lucy Okello 92,500
13,875
106,375
AKAIDEBE 'B'REA/AKBM/221 Ouma Richard
70,000 10,50
0 80,50
0
REA/AKBM/222 Ekwaro Robert 120,000
18,000
138,000
REA/AKBM/223 Obua Peter 7,000
1,050
8,050
REA/AKBM/224 Okullo Alfred 14,000
2,100
16,100
REA/AKBM/225 Okwir Oscar 60,000
9,000
69,000
REA/AKBM/226 Apeuyo Tom 25,000
3,750
28,750
REA/AKBM/227 Okori Patrick 82,000
12,300
94,300
REA/AKBM/228 Okot James Wacha 5,000
750
5,750
61
REA/AKBM/229 Tyan Peter 8,000
1,200
9,200
REA/AKBM/230 Owiny Anthony 9,000
1,350
10,350
REA/AKBM/231 Obote Benson 30,000
4,500
34,500
REA/AKBM/232 Dunyiro Jasper 23,000
3,450
26,450
REA/AKBM/233 Ayoo Martin 31,500
4,725
36,225
REA/AKBM/234 Santa Okwir 60,000
9,000
69,000
REA/AKBM/235 Odongo Charlse 100,000
15,000
115,000
REA/AKBM/236 Odai David 20,000
3,000
23,000
REA/AKBM/237 Obonyo T.G 150,000
22,500
172,500
REA/AKBM/238 Rose Obuga 60,000
9,000
69,000
REA/AKBM/239 Ongiro George 20,000
3,000
23,000
REA/AKBM/240 Ouma Richard 65,000
9,750
74,750
REA/AKBM/241 Olobo Edward 5,000
750
5,750
REA/AKBM/242 Ebabu Joe 10,500
1,575
12,075
REA/AKBM/243 Angulu Bonny 2,500
375
2,875
REA/AKBM/244 Ogwok 46,000
6,900
52,900
REA/AKBM/245 Eagle Wings Academy 65,200
9,780
74,980
REA/AKBM/246 Omach James 20,000
3,000
23,000
REA/AKBM/247 Ogwal Patrick 20,000
3,000
23,000
REA/AKBM/248 Otak Charlse 10,000
1,500
11,500
REA/AKBM/249 Otim James 20,000
3,000
23,000
62
REA/AKBM/250 Okello Tablique 15,000
2,250
17,250
REA/AKBM/251 Loro Sub County Head Quarters
174,800
26,220
201,020
REA/AKBM/252 Loro Health Centre II 40,000
6,000
46,000
REA/AKBM/253 Loro S.S.S 177,000
26,550
203,550
AKAOIDEBE 'A'
REA/AKBM/254 St. Peters Church of Uganda
50,000
7,500
57,500
REA/AKBM/255 Loro Primary School 1,152,000
172,800
1,324,800
REA/AKBM/256 Loro Core Primary Teachers College
596,000
89,400
685,400
ALICAREA/AKBM/257 Ajwang Milly
25,500 3,82
5 29,32
5
REA/AKBM/258 Okullo Benson 35,000
5,250
40,250
REA/AKBM/259 Ongar Charlse 10,000
1,500
11,500
REA/AKBM/260 Aboko John 75,000
11,250
86,250
REA/AKBM/261 Okello Washington 10,000
1,500
11,500
REA/AKBM/262 Ojok Alfred 10,000
1,500
11,500
REA/AKBM/263 Otim Alele 12,000
1,800
13,800
REA/AKBM/264 Olwata okullo Richard 883,750 132,563
1,016,313
REA/AKBM/265 Ongwen Rashid 194,000
29,100
223,100
REA/AKBM/266 Scovia Tuma 67,000
10,050
77,050
REA/AKBM/267 Ogwal Inasimu 30,000
4,500
34,500
REA/AKBM/268 Lucy Atoma 27,600
4,140
31,740
63
REA/AKBM/269 Wacha Alfred 14,000
2,100
16,100
REA/AKBM/270 Apio Molly 14,000
2,100
16,100
REA/AKBM/271 Ana Akullo 396,900
59,535
456,435
REA/AKBM/272 Pastor Ongiru 209,000
31,350
240,350
REA/AKBM/273 Okech Esakali 20,000
3,000
23,000
ACAN KOMA
REA/AKBM/274 Loro Model Primary School
44,000
6,600
50,600
REA/AKBM/275 Odwe James 64,000
9,600
73,600
REA/AKBM/276 Agnes Ogwal 123,500
18,525
142,025
REA/AKBM/277 Apio Alice 204,025
30,604
234,629
REA/AKBM/278 Olak Dickson 45,000
6,750
51,750
REA/AKBM/279 Obong Sam 955,000
143,250
1,098,250
REA/AKBM/280 Opio Richard 24,500
3,675
28,175
REA/AKBM/281 Owacha Geofrey 170,000
25,500
195,500
REA/AKBM/282 Farmer Field School 118,800
17,820
136,620
REA/AKBM/283 Benson Opio 97,000
14,550
111,550
REA/AKBM/284 Ocen Alfred 58,000
8,700
66,700
BARMWONYREA/AKBM/285 Ogwal Simon
87,000 13,05
0 100,05
0
REA/AKBM/286 Ebong John 80,000
12,000
92,000
REA/AKBM/287 Obong George 70,000
10,500
80,500
64
REA/AKBM/288 Opio Bosco 50,000
7,500
57,500
REA/AKBM/289 Community Land Barmwony
20,000
3,000
23,000
REA/AKBM/290 Obura Sam 158,000
23,700
181,700
REA/AKBM/291 Okwir Charlse 62,500
9,375
71,875
REA/AKBM/292 Ogwal Richard Odur 8,000
1,200
9,200
REA/AKBM/293 Apollo Enesta 27,500
4,125
31,625
REA/AKBM/294 Odora Jimmy 148,000
22,200
170,200
REA/AKBM/295 Acai Francis 116,000
17,400
133,400
REA/AKBM/296 Calvin Erem 71,000
10,650
81,650
REA/AKBM/297 Otim Patrick 658,500
98,775
757,275
REA/AKBM/298 Alobo Dickens 226,000
33,900
259,900
BARLYE CREA/AKBM/299 Ayo Jasper
318,000 47,70
0 365,70
0
REA/AKBM/300 Olweny Geofrey 920,250
138,038
1,058,288
REA/AKBM/301 Ducu Gabriel 52,500
7,875
60,375
REA/AKBM/302 Ducu Emmanuel 198,750 29,813
228,563
REA/AKBM/303 Oyite Ambrose 26,250
3,938
30,188
REA/AKBM/304 Okwiji Michael 4,000
600
4,600
REA/AKBM/305 Emaro Sam 253,750 38,063
291,813
REA/AKBM/306 Ongom Israel 167,000
25,050
192,050
REA/AKBM/307 Esau Omara 345,000
51,750
396,750
65
REA/AKBM/308 Ongenga Jacob 433,000
64,950
497,950
REA/AKBM/309 Levi Niye 1,990,000
298,500
2,288,500
REA/AKBM/310 Ogwal Peter 25,000
3,750
28,750
REA/AKBM/311 Opara John 723,625 108,544
832,169
REA/AKBM/312 Okullo Peter Arach 698,500
104,775
803,275
REA/AKBM/313 Milly Okii 30,000
4,500
34,500
REA/AKBM/314 Okullo Peter Arach 47,500
7,125
54,625
ASABA SUBCOUNTY
OTWE
REA/AKBM/315 Ongwech David 227,000
34,050
261,050
REA/AKBM/316 Kiiza Washington 10,000
1,500
11,500
REA/AKBM/317 Okene Alex 50,000
7,500
57,500
REA/AKBM/318 Ojok Robert 12,000
1,800
13,800
REA/AKBM/319 Aporo George 20,000
3,000
23,000
REA/AKBM/320 Erume John 107,000
16,050
123,050
REA/AKBM/321 Apwony Ongom Denis 15,000
2,250
17,250
REA/AKBM/322 Okwe Richard 50,000
7,500
57,500
REA/AKBM/323 Omara Joe 50,000
7,500
57,500
REA/AKBM/324 Amony Nelson 70,250
10,538
80,788
REA/AKBM/325 Oyengo David 26,500
3,975
30,475
REA/AKBM/326 Etuk John 71,000
10,650
81,650
66
REA/AKBM/327 Arach Lawrence 50,000
7,500
57,500
REA/AKBM/328 Ojuko Quinto 50,000
7,500
57,500
REA/AKBM/329 Oyengo David 100,000
15,000
115,000
REA/AKBM/330 Apul Isaac 150,000
22,500
172,500
REA/AKBM/331 Abeja Charlse 195,000
29,250
224,250
LORO SUBCOUNTY ABONGO OKERE
REA/AKBM/332 Ogwang Leo 175,000
26,250
201,250
REA/AKBM/333 Molly Atim 50,370
7,556
57,926
REA/AKBM/334 Elen Tony 28,000
4,200
32,200
REA/AKBM/335 Odong Felix 247,375 37,106
284,481
REA/AKBM/336 Ongom Patrick 574,000
86,100
660,100
REA/AKBM/337 Odongo David 191,625 28,744
220,369
REA/AKBM/338 Otim Bob 106,456 15,968
122,424
REA/AKBM/339 Okullo Franco 94,500
14,175
108,675
ABOLONENOREA/AKBM/340 Okori Nelson
94,000 14,10
0 108100
REA/AKBM/341 Next to Okori Nelson 30,000
4,500 34500
REA/AKBM/342 Ekii Michael 9,000
1,350 10350
REA/AKBM/343 Ekwaro Peter 20,000
3,000 23000
REA/AKBM/344 Odila Richard 24,000
3,600 27600
67
REA/AKBM/345 Acak Joel 10,000
1,500 11500
REA/AKBM/346 Omara Nelson 77,500
11,625 89125
REA/AKBM/347 Omara Thomas 10,000
1,500
11,500
REA/AKBM/348 Next to Omara Thomas 25,000
3,750
28,750
REA/AKBM/349 Ayo Francis 43,000
6,450
49,450
REA/AKBM/350 Opio Alex 11,000
1,650
12,650
REA/AKBM/351 Opio Edward 7,000
1,050
8,050
REA/AKBM/352 Ayo Yoventino 10,000
1,500
11,500
REA/AKBM/353 Adong Lucy 8,000
1,200
9,200
REA/AKBM/354 Ana Okao 27,500
4,125
31,625
REA/AKBM/355 Opio Lawrence 10,000
1,500
11,500
REA/AKBM/356 Next to Opio Lawrence 6,000
900
6,900
REA/AKBM/357 Simao Engole 9,000
1,350
10,350
REA/AKBM/358 Ayo Yoventino 76,000
11,400
87,400
REA/AKBM/359 Obura Geofrey 1,000
150
1,150
REA/AKBM/360 Next to Obura Geofrey
20,000
3,000
23,000
REA/AKBM/361 Okullo (1) 5,000
750
5,750
REA/AKBM/362 Ogwang Nelson 30,000
4,500
34,500
REA/AKBM/363 Okullo (2) 156,000
23,400
179,400
REA/AKBM/364 Oloro Solomon 45,000
6,750
51,750
REA/AKBM/365 Ajwang Milly 12,000
1,800
13,800
68
REA/AKBM/366 Ojede Moses 40,000
6,000
46,000
REA/AKBM/367 Okot Christopher 32,000
4,800
36,800
REA/AKBM/368 Opio Solomon 13,000
1,950
14,950
REA/AKBM/369 Ocen William 6,000
900
6,900
REA/AKBM/370 Ongom Sam 36,000
5,400
41,400
REA/AKBM/371 Okello Edward 25,000
3,750
28,750
REA/AKBM/372 Owani Charlse 134,000
20,100
154,100
REA/AKBM/373 Ogwang Nelson 60,000
9,000
69,000
REA/AKBM/374 Grace Wani 22,000
3,300
25,300
REA/AKBM/375 Atim Stella 30,000
4,500
34,500
REA/AKBM/376 Engole George 10,000
1,500
11,500
REA/AKBM/377 Stella Atim 9,000
1,350
10,350
REA/AKBM/378 Wani Simon Peter 17,000
2,550
19,550
REA/AKBM/379 Obua Sam 11,000
1,650
12,650
REA/AKBM/380 Owani Patrick 65,000
9,750
74,750
REA/AKBM/381 Orinaya Atim 53,000
7,950
60,950
REA/AKBM/382 Ekii Walter 35,000
5,250
40,250
AWE IKWO
REA/AKBM/383 Charlse Opio Ojuka 41,500
6,225
47,725
REA/AKBM/384 Amonya Patrick 516,000
77,400
593,400
REA/AKBM/385 Okullo Vicent 40,000
6,000
46,000
69
REA/AKBM/386 Owiny Aloysious 18,000
2,700
20,700
REA/AKBM/387 Sarah Ogwang 5,000
750
5,750
REA/AKBM/388 Atim Buruno 110,000
16,500
126,500
REA/AKBM/389 Opido Jimmy 149,000
22,350
171,350
REA/AKBM/390 Oming Tom 20,000
3,000
23,000
REA/AKBM/391 Opiny Jimmy 90,000
13,500
103,500
REA/AKBM/392 Alur Charlse 3,000
450
3,450
REA/AKBM/393 Adyang Kenneth 90,000
13,500
103,500
REA/AKBM/394 Amonya Patrick 15,000
2,250
17,250
REA/AKBM/395 Otim Patrick Olwa 45,000
6,750
51,750
REA/AKBM/396 Ocen Jimmy 1,000
150
1,150
REA/AKBM/397 Ocrach Nicholas 40,000
6,000
46,000
REA/AKBM/398 Olipa James 40,000
6,000
46,000
REA/AKBM/399 Oder Thomas 10,000
1,500
11,500
REA/AKBM/400 Ogwal Lawrence 50,000
7,500
57,500
REA/AKBM/401 Amonya Patrick 20,000
3,000
23,000
REA/AKBM/402 Oyota Alfred 40,000
6,000
46,000
REA/AKBM/403 Achili John 20,000
3,000
23,000
REA/AKBM/404 Owani Pilate 40,000
6,000
46,000
REA/AKBM/405 Tia Albino 17,000
2,550
19,550
REA/AKBM/406 Onyany Alfred 20,000
3,000
23,000
70
REA/AKBM/407 Omara Sam 20,000
3,000
23,000
REA/AKBM/408 Semi Olot 41,000
6,150
47,150
REA/AKBM/409 Otak Patrick 60,000
9,000
69,000
REA/AKBM/410 Ecum Patrick 31,000
4,650
35,650
REA/AKBM/411 Ojok Ceaser 10,000
1,500
11,500
REA/AKBM/412 Okello Kosia 20,000
3,000
23,000
REA/AKBM/413 Odeng Bosco 1,000
150
1,150
REA/AKBM/414 Odyek Lawrence 5,000
750
5,750
REA/AKBM/415 Acanga Edonge Agoro 5,000
750
5,750
REA/AKBM/416 Etonga Silvesto 5,000
750
5,750
REA/AKBM/417 Okecha Patrick 5,000
750
5,750
REA/AKBM/418 Ocan Michael 7,000
1,050
8,050
ABER SUBCOUNTY DAM AMALO
REA/AKBM/419 Agenowong Sam 32,000
4,800
36,800
REA/AKBM/420 Agong Peter 10,000
1,500
11,500
REA/AKBM/421 Onedi Bosco 20,000
3,000
23,000
REA/AKBM/422 Arya Polly 75,000
11,250
86,250
REA/AKBM/423 Odyek Willy 38,725 5,809
44,534
REA/AKBM/424 Okullo Sam 115,000
17,250
132,250
REA/AKBM/425 Odongo Richard 27,000
4,050
31,050
71
REA/AKBM/426 Otyal Francis 10,000
1,500
11,500
REA/AKBM/427 Awuchu Daniel 2,000
300
2,300
REA/AKBM/428 Alyata Lawrence 21,000
3,150
24,150
REA/AKBM/429 Ayo Patrick 10,000
1,500
11,500
REA/AKBM/430 Odongo Santo 85,000
12,750
97,750
REA/AKBM/431 Ongom David 106,000
15,900
121,900
REA/AKBM/432 Odongo Simon 40,000
6,000
46,000
REA/AKBM/433 Amoko Joseph 20,000
3,000
23,000
REA/AKBM/434 Ocen Moses 20,000
3,000
23,000
REA/AKBM/435 Otuke Benard 35,000
5,250
40,250
REA/AKBM/436 Olunyi William 80,000
12,000
92,000
REA/AKBM/437 Obwor Emmanual 326,500
48,975
375,475
REA/AKBM/438 Olwa 60,000
9,000
69,000
DAM APINYREA/AKBM/439 Okwanga Quirino
95,000 14,25
0 109,250
REA/AKBM/440 Otim Kenneth 20,000
3,000
23,000
REA/AKBM/441 Okech Godfrey 170,000
25,500
195,500
REA/AKBM/442 Okacha Geofrey 19,000
2,850
21,850
REA/AKBM/443 Ogwal David 24,000
3,600
27,600
REA/AKBM/444 Owiny Okwonga 18,000
2,700
20,700
REA/AKBM/445 Ogwang Robert 12,000
1,800
13,800
72
REA/AKBM/446 Acipa Pasca 90,000
13,500
103,500
REA/AKBM/447 Amuja Denis 7,000
1,050
8,050
REA/AKBM/448 Ogwang Robert 424,000
63,600
487,600
LWALAREA/AKBM/449 Oryem Vicent
60,000 9,00
0 69,000
REA/AKBM/450 Okello Bonny 25,000
3,750
28,750
REA/AKBM/451 Opio Robert 50,500
7,575
58,075
REA/AKBM/452 Onyang Kassim 138,000
20,700
158,700
REA/AKBM/453 Adupa Robert 50,000
7,500
57,500
REA/AKBM/454 Oyite Jasper 13,000
1,950
14,950
REA/AKBM/455 Oceng George 100,000
15,000
115,000
REA/AKBM/456 Fr. Oryang Mem. Primary School
310,000
46,500
356,500
ALOBO LAC
REA/AKBM/457 Okwany Alfred 15,000
2,250
17,250
REA/AKBM/458 Obira Bosco 4,000
600
4,600
REA/AKBM/459 Akao Roseline 2,000
300
2,300
REA/AKBM/460 Odyek Mike 5,000
750
5,750
REA/AKBM/461 Florence Adong 10,000
1,500
11,500
REA/AKBM/462 Angwen Kerobina 58,000
8,700
66,700
REA/AKBM/463 Ogwal Denis 10,000
1,500
11,500
REA/AKBM/464 Okeny Geofrey 18,000
2,700
20,700
73
REA/AKBM/465 Adeli Seraphino 18,000
2,700
20,700
REA/AKBM/466 Ebila Robert 20,000
3,000
23,000
REA/AKBM/467 Odongo Mark 70,000
10,500
80,500
REA/AKBM/468 Onap Richard 10,000
1,500
11,500
REA/AKBM/469 Ogwal Anthony 1,000
150
1,150
REA/AKBM/470 Alunya Odongo 10,000
1,500
11,500
REA/AKBM/471 Okwanga Robert 15,000
2,250
17,250
BARCALREA/AKBM/472 Amuko Tom
10,000 1,50
0 11,500
REA/AKBM/473 Okello Paskali 15,000
2,250
17,250
REA/AKBM/474 Nyangkoni Julius 10,000
1,500
11,500
REA/AKBM/475 Agonyo Robert 7,000
1,050
8,050
REA/AKBM/476 Ojok David 115,000
17,250
132,250
REA/AKBM/477 Pastor Ayee Benson 7,000
1,050
8,050
REA/AKBM/478 Okello Nelson 60,000
9,000
69,000
REA/AKBM/479 Okii David 15,000
2,250
17,250
REA/AKBM/480 Obyelo Tommy 40,000
6,000
46,000
REA/AKBM/481 Santa Eyit 10,000
1,500
11,500
REA/AKBM/482 Obyelo Patrick 15,000
2,250
17,250
REA/AKBM/483 Omara Vicent 101,000
15,150
116,150
REA/AKBM/484 Ebil Tom 39,375 5,906
45,281
74
REA/AKBM/485 Okello Bosco 5,000
750
5,750
REA/AKBM/486 Ebil George 15,000
2,250
17,250
REA/AKBM/487 Owiny Robert 10,000
1,500
11,500
REA/AKBM/488 Odyek Peter 10,000
1,500
11,500
REA/AKBM/489 Obyelo Hudson 48,877 7,332
56,209
REA/AKBM/490 Odyek Richard 10,000
1,500
11,500
REA/AKBM/491 Ongora Charlse 203,000
30,450
233,450
REA/AKBM/492 Odyek Peter 264,000
39,600
303,600
KAMDINI SUBCOUNTY
ADAK 'B'
REA/AKBM/493 Odyek Peter 54,000
8,100
62,100
REA/AKBM/494 Opio Richard 20,000
3,000
23,000
REA/AKBM/495 Okore Norbert 9,000
1,350
10,350
REA/AKBM/496 Ocen Martin 20,000
3,000
23,000
REA/AKBM/497 Opio Cipriano 25,000
3,750
28,750
REA/AKBM/498 Ogwang Cipriano 82,000
12,300
94,300
REA/AKBM/499 Oduke Ambrose 12,500
1,875
14,375
REA/AKBM/500 Odongo Tony 45,000
6,750
51,750
REA/AKBM/501 Okodi Jasper 91,000
13,650
104,650
REA/AKBM/502 Ngole Alfred 120,000
18,000
138,000
REA/AKBM/503 Okullo Walter 32,000
4,800
36,800
75
REA/AKBM/504 Okodi Jasper 5,000
750
5,750
ADAK 'A'
REA/AKBM/505 Teke George 20,000
3,000
23,000
REA/AKBM/506 Ocen Nelson 40,000
6,000
46,000
REA/AKBM/507 Odyek Albino 10,000
1,500
11,500
REA/AKBM/508 Adak Church of Uganda 15,000
2,250
17,250
REA/AKBM/509 Okot Dick 20,000
3,000
23,000
REA/AKBM/510 Olum Tobby 79,500
11,925
91,425
REA/AKBM/511 Okol Michael 9,250
1,388
10,638
REA/AKBM/512 Otoo Terrence 542,500
81,375
623,875
REA/AKBM/513 Okello Fred 93,500
14,025
107,525
REA/AKBM/514 Olum Yokusafati 40,000
6,000
46,000
REA/AKBM/515 Odongo Vicent 40,000
6,000
46,000
REA/AKBM/516 Okala Alex 75,000
11,250
86,250
REA/AKBM/517 Ayo Charlse 35,000
5,250
40,250
REA/AKBM/518 Alonga Joel 20,000
3,000
23,000
REA/AKBM/519 Okodi David 25,000
3,750
28,750
REA/AKBM/520 Okali Alex 50,000
7,500
57,500
REA/AKBM/521 Oukalle Dok 30,000
4,500
34,500
REA/AKBM/522 Acin David 40,000
6,000
46,000
REA/AKBM/523 Ogwang Akodo 40,000
6,000
46,000
76
REA/AKBM/524 Otia Geofrey 20,000
3,000
23,000
REA/AKBM/525 Opio Bruno 55,000
8,250
63,250
REA/AKBM/526 Ogwal Francis 50,000
7,500
57,500
REA/AKBM/527 Adupa George 20,000
3,000
23,000
REA/AKBM/528 Ongora Ray 45,000
6,750
51,750
REA/AKBM/529 Olot George 15,500
2,325
17,825
REA/AKBM/530 Owiny George 236,000
35,400
271,400
REA/AKBM/531 Opio Odyek 38,000
5,700
43,700
REA/AKBM/532 Okudu Samuel 7,000
1,050
8,050
REA/AKBM/533 Nurse 34,000
5,100
39,100
REA/AKBM/534 Ongu Ego Tom 20,500
3,075
23,575
REA/AKBM/535 Okello Simon 25,000
3,750
28,750
REA/AKBM/536 Ekii Lawrence 158,000
23,700
181,700
REA/AKBM/537 Ongada George 75,000
11,250
86,250
ABER SUBCOUNTY ALYEC
REA/AKBM/538 Ayo Tom Richard 40,000
6,000
46,000
REA/AKBM/539 Selima Olwa Shaban 10,000
1,500
11,500
REA/AKBM/540 Okullo Ojok 1,775,000
266,250
2,041,250
REA/AKBM/541 Otogo Pius 6,000
900
6,900
REA/AKBM/542 Ayo Tony 20,000
3,000
23,000
77
REA/AKBM/543 Ogwang Patrick 20,000
3,000
23,000
REA/AKBM/544 Ayini Jimmy 40,000
6,000
46,000
REA/AKBM/545 Odongo Felix 30,000
4,500
34,500
REA/AKBM/546 Odongo Dick 12,000
1,800
13,800
REA/AKBM/547 Ogwang Patrick 24,000
3,600
27,600
TWOCAN IKWERIREA/AKBM/548 Otyang Jimmy
20,000 3,00
0 23,000
REA/AKBM/549 Ester Ajik 26,000
3,900
29,900
REA/AKBM/550 Ocen Egach 71,000
10,650
81,650
REA/AKBM/551 Anana Terensio 20,000
3,000
23,000
CEKWEREREA/AKBM/552 Odongo Luis
143,000 21,45
0 164,450
REA/AKBM/553 Otim Ronald 500
75
575
REA/AKBM/554 Ogwal Felix 20,000
3,000
23,000
REA/AKBM/555 Opio Francis 27,000
4,050
31,050
REA/AKBM/556 Otwal Egwel 6,000
900
6,900
REA/AKBM/557 Patricia Amyuru 45,000
6,750
51,750
REA/AKBM/558 Atim Raymond 100,000
15,000
115,000
CORNER ATAPARAREA/AKBM/559 Egwel Richard
20,000 3,00
0 23,000
REA/AKBM/560 Acire Tomoi 20,000
3,000
23,000
78
REA/AKBM/561 Angulu Ceaser 10,000
1,500
11,500
REA/AKBM/562 Akello Enester 22,000
3,300
25,300
REA/AKBM/563 Olobo Robert 75,825 11,374
87,199
REA/AKBM/564 Oryang Dan 411,175 61,676
472,851
REA/AKBM/565 Ojok Stephen 108,013
16,202
124,215
REA/AKBM/566 Alele William 70,625
10,594
81,219
REA/AKBM/567 Lucy Opito 71,000
10,650
81,650
REA/AKBM/568 Obadia Oryang Estate 392,000
58,800
450,800
REA/AKBM/569 Tommy Opito 30,000
4,500
34,500
REA/AKBM/570 Opito Denis 37,500
5,625
43,125
REA/AKBM/571 Kia Florence 245,000
36,750
281,750
REA/AKBM/572 Benard Opito 75,000
11,250
86,250
KAMDINI SUBCOUNTY ABULI
REA/AKBM/573 Obadia Oryang Estate 139,000
20,850
159,850
REA/AKBM/574 Ojoka Jackson 42,325 6,349
48,674
REA/AKBM/575 Okello Santo 47,000
7,050
54,050
REA/AKBM/576 Okii Ricky 60,000
9,000
69,000
REA/AKBM/577 Owing Amos 25,000
3,750
28,750
REA/AKBM/578 Atoo James 34,500
5,175
39,675
REA/AKBM/579 Dr. Oryem Vicent 50,000
7,500
57,500
REA/AKBM/580 Oday Francis 30,000
4,500
34,500
79
REA/AKBM/581 Otim Jacinta 23,000
3,450
26,450
ABER SUBCOUNTY AWELO MAKWERI
REA/AKBM/582 Selestino Okite 45,000
6,750
51,750
REA/AKBM/583 Abonyu Margret 30,000
4,500
34,500
REA/AKBM/584 Epila Robert 10,000
1,500
11,500
REA/AKBM/585 Otango 65,000
9,750
74,750
REA/AKBM/586 Omara Francis 2,000
300
2,300
REA/AKBM/587 Opio Charlse 2,000
300
2,300
REA/AKBM/588 Owiny Jimmy 256,400
38,460
294,860
REA/AKBM/589 Odung Denis 20,000
3,000
23,000
REA/AKBM/590 Onyera William 43,000
6,450
49,450
REA/AKBM/591 Otwal Wilson 14,000
2,100
16,100
REA/AKBM/592 Opio Christopher 8,000
1,200
9,200
REA/AKBM/593 Jabulon Ogwang 69,625 10,444
80,069
REA/AKBM/594 Ogwang Leko 116,000
17,400
133,400
REA/AKBM/595 Benet Odong 7,000
1,050
8,050
REA/AKBM/596 Ogwal Leko 46,000
6,900
52,900
REA/AKBM/597 Jedikea Mono C/O Ayiny Jimmy
21,000
3,150
24,150
REA/AKBM/598 Okello Oloro 20,000
3,000
23,000
REA/AKBM/599 Orech Kenneth 16,000
2,400
18,400
80
REA/AKBM/600 Opio Christopher 10,000
1,500
11,500
REA/AKBM/601 Okite Nelson 33,000
4,950
37,950
REA/AKBM/602 Otim Sam 23,000
3,450
26,450
REA/AKBM/603 Okwanga Washington 40,000
6,000
46,000
REA/AKBM/604 Alinga Constance 60,000
9,000
69,000
REA/AKBM/605 Olugu Terensio 18,500
2,775
21,275
REA/AKBM/606 Ojok William 590,000
88,500
678,500
REA/AKBM/607 Okwanga Jolly Ojok 5,000
750
5,750
REA/AKBM/608 Otim Robert 325,000
48,750
373,750
REA/AKBM/609 Okodi Jimmy 24,000
3,600
27,600
OKETO BITOREA/AKBM/610 Olugu Mudu Kayo
205,000 30,75
0 235,750
REA/AKBM/611 Ayo Julius Peter 213,000
31,950
244,950
REA/AKBM/612 Dollotiya Otim 374,000
56,100
430,100
REA/AKBM/613 Dollotiya Munu Ocol 1,980,000
297,000
2,277,000
AWARIPINYREA/AKBM/614 Aber Primary School
158,500 23,77
5 182,275
REA/AKBM/615 Oluma David 10,088
1,513
11,601
REA/AKBM/616 Atik Cherulaka 40,000
6,000
46,000
REA/AKBM/617 Okello Robin 11,000
1,650
12,650
REA/AKBM/618 Opito Washington 40,000
6,000
46,000
81
REA/AKBM/619 Acut Nelson 5,000
750
5,750
REA/AKBM/620 Olwit Benard 15,000
2,250
17,250
REA/AKBM/621 Odongo Francis 111,000
16,650
127,650
REA/AKBM/622 Okello Nelson 30,000
4,500
34,500
REA/AKBM/623 Otim Vicent 2,700
405
3,105
REA/AKBM/624 Ogwal Denis 50,000
7,500
57,500
OKARAWOKREA/AKBM/625 Abang Lucy
437,500 65,62
5 503,125
REA/AKBM/626 Simpo Odyek 20,000
3,000
23,000
REA/AKBM/627 Olugu Oribo 10,000
1,500
11,500
REA/AKBM/628 Anyuru Anthony 40,000
6,000
46,000
REA/AKBM/629 Maritina Kasajja 10,000
1,500
11,500
REA/AKBM/630 Florence Akech 5,000
750
5,750
REA/AKBM/631 Omara John 120,000
18,000
138,000
REA/AKBM/632 Opio Moses 11,000
1,650
12,650
REA/AKBM/633 Odongo Thomson 60,000
9,000
69,000
REA/AKBM/634 Mitolesi Okwanga 45,000
6,750
51,750
REA/AKBM/635 Nawome Obete 75,000
11,250
86,250
REA/AKBM/636 Okodi Adupa 75,000
11,250
86,250
REA/AKBM/637 Alice Engede 30,000
4,500
34,500
REA/AKBM/638 Akello Betty 22,000
3,300
25,300
82
REA/AKBM/639 Atyang Charlse 30,000
4,500
34,500
REA/AKBM/640 Onyala Abdu 23,000
3,450
26,450
REA/AKBM/641 Akello Milly 25,000
3,750
28,750
AROK
REA/AKBM/642 Okello Richard 4,000
600
4,600
REA/AKBM/643 Aguma Tony 7,000
1,050
8,050
REA/AKBM/644 Opio Christopher 21,500
3,225
24,725
REA/AKBM/645 Ojok William 23,500
3,525
27,025
REA/AKBM/646 Okenyi Christopher 66,750
10,013
76,763
REA/AKBM/647 Olugu Jefenia 13,500
2,025
15,525
KAMDINI SUBCOUNTY DOG ABAM
REA/AKBM/648 Rada Grace 118,000
17,700
135,700
REA/AKBM/649 Ajok Marther 93,000
13,950
106,950
AMUKUGUNGUREA/AKBM/650 Ojuka Mark
20,000 3,00
0 23,000
REA/AKBM/651 Odongo Moses 24,000
3,600
27,600
REA/AKBM/652 Akello Rose 37,875 5,681
43,556
REA/AKBM/653 Elwa Amos 30,625
4,594
35,219
REA/AKBM/654 Alunyu Saidi 123,000
18,450
141,450
KAMDINI TOWN BOARDREA/AKBM/655 Okello Olong
3,000 45
0 3,450
83
REA/AKBM/656 Odongo (Mechanic) 17,500
2,625
20,125
REA/AKBM/657 Okello Yewe 471,500
70,725
542,225
REA/AKBM/658 Ogwal Small 193,000
28,950
221,950
REA/AKBM/659 Joyce Ogwal 144,500
21,675
166,175
REA/AKBM/660 Ogwang Sam 3,000
450
3,450
REA/AKBM/661 Mama Anjelina 20,000
3,000
23,000
REA/AKBM/662 Nengo Emmanuel 50,000
7,500
57,500
REA/AKBM/663 Omony Nelson 50,000
7,500
57,500
REA/AKBM/664 Ogwang Sam's Sister 50,000
7,500
57,500
REA/AKBM/665 Owelo Lawrence 16,500
2,475
18,975
REA/AKBM/666 Adimu Simon 50,000
7,500
57,500
REA/AKBM/667 Sofia 2,000
300
2,300
REA/AKBM/668 Bank Manager (Next to Atik Serulaka)
20,000
3,000
23,000
REA/AKBM/669 Onzi Saidi 23,000
3,450
26,450
REA/AKBM/670 St. Peter and Paul Catholic Church
27,000
4,050
31,050
REA/AKBM/671 Agwa Jenesio 9,000
1,350
10,350
REA/AKBM/672 Ecat Moses 63,000
9,450
72,450
REA/AKBM/673 Joyce Obonyo 97,500
14,625
112,125
ABANYA 'B'REA/AKBM/674 Alunyu Fred
76,000 11,40
0 87,400
REA/AKBM/675 Rose Alunyu 232,500
34,875
267,375
84
REA/AKBM/676 Welo 6,500
975
7,475
REA/AKBM/677 Owor Moses 1,000
150
1,150
REA/AKBM/678 Okello Albino 23,500
3,525
27,025
ABANYA 'A'REA/AKBM/679 Juspin Akello
197,000 29,55
0 226,550
REA/AKBM/680 Ocen Ambrose 50,000
7,500
57,500
REA/AKBM/681 Okello Yurumoi 14,500
2,175
16,675
REA/AKBM/682 Emat Joyce Ongom 49,500
7,425
56,925
REA/AKBM/683 Owiny Saidi 40,000
6,000
46,000
REA/AKBM/684 Ocila Odongo 38,000
5,700
43,700
REA/AKBM/685 Odongo Willy 51,000
7,650
58,650
REA/AKBM/686 Ocen Augustine 120,000
18,000
138,000
REA/AKBM/687 Kinyera John Bosco 35,000
5,250
40,250
REA/AKBM/688 Otim Justine 86,000
12,900
98,900
REA/AKBM/689 Omara Alfred 36,000
5,400
41,400
REA/AKBM/690 Obote Martin 53,000
7,950
60,950
REA/AKBM/691 Owelo Jimmy 20,000
3,000
23,000
REA/AKBM/692 Okello Vicent 40,000
6,000
46,000
REA/AKBM/693 Okello Ngai 32,900
4,935
37,835
REA/AKBM/694 Otoo Alino 32,900
4,935
37,835
REA/AKBM/695 Pamela Akello 108,000
16,200
124,200
85
REA/AKBM/696 Omara Patrick 40,000
6,000
46,000
ALYEC
REA/AKBM/697 Terensio Omwony 67,000
10,050
77,050
REA/AKBM/698 Karens Apoto 16,000
2,400
18,400
REA/AKBM/699 Joyce Angiru 90,000
13,500
103,500
REA/AKBM/700 Okello Nick 92,000
13,800
105,800
REA/AKBM/701 Ogoro Alfred 2,000
300
2,300
REA/AKBM/702 Ogwal Dickens 22,000
3,300
25,300
REA/AKBM/703 Opio Charlse 67,500
10,125
77,625
REA/AKBM/704 Odongo Raymond 41,000
6,150
47,150
REA/AKBM/705 Abok John 209,000
31,350
240,350
REA/AKBM/706 Okello Jimmy 35,000
5,250
40,250
REA/AKBM/707 Otwal Nelson 50,000
7,500
57,500
REA/AKBM/708 Ojok Awar 10,000
1,500
11,500
REA/AKBM/709 Fabiano Welo 121,000
18,150
139,150
REA/AKBM/710 Ojok Jack 10,000
1,500
11,500
REA/AKBM/711 Omach Lawrence 267,000
40,050
307,050
REA/AKBM/712 Odida Vicent 50,000
7,500
57,500
REA/AKBM/713 Okello Richard 87,500
13,125
100,625
REA/AKBM/714 Ilwar Raymond 225,000
33,750
258,750
REA/AKBM/715 Omara Salvor 500,000
75,000
575,000
86
REA/AKBM/716 Ojok Jimmy 2,000
300
2,300
REA/AKBM/717 Ogwang Patrick 10,500
1,575
12,075
PUKICAREA/AKBM/718 Ayang Lillian
50,000 7,50
0 57,500
REA/AKBM/719 Opendo James 50,000
7,500
57,500
REA/AKBM/720 Ocen Mark 30,000
4,500
34,500
REA/AKBM/721 Okello Richard 36,000
5,400
41,400
REA/AKBM/722 Opio Geofrey 20,000
3,000
23,000
REA/AKBM/723 Odongo Richard 5,000
750
5,750
REA/AKBM/724 Ongole Bosco 20,000
3,000
23,000
REA/AKBM/725 Aleny Primary School 50,000
7,500
57,500
BOROBORO 'B'REA/AKBM/726 C/O Ogwal Terence
180,500 27,07
5 207,575
REA/AKBM/727 Bosco Onyanga 89,000
13,350
102,350
REA/AKBM/728 Okello Ejep 17,000
2,550
19,550
REA/AKBM/729 Otuk Richard 20,000
3,000
23,000
REA/AKBM/730 Otoo Akol 20,000
3,000
23,000
REA/AKBM/731 Owingi Patrick 10,000
1,500
11,500
REA/AKBM/732 Ochen Quinto 5,000
750
5,750
REA/AKBM/733 Okoko Patrick 20,000
3,000
23,000
REA/AKBM/734 Opio Tobby 5,000
750
5,750
87
BOROBORO 'A'REA/AKBM/735 Florence Opio
130,000 19,50
0 149,500
REA/AKBM/736 Adiyo Raymond 12,000
1,800
13,800
REA/AKBM/737 Achaya Richard 7,000
1,050
8,050
REA/AKBM/738 Ochol Patrick 20,000
3,000
23,000
REA/AKBM/739 Atim Robert 9,000
1,350
10,350
REA/AKBM/740 Ochon Patrick 20,000
3,000
23,000
REA/AKBM/741 Owar Sam 15,000
2,250
17,250
REA/AKBM/742 Okello Francis 6,000
900
6,900
REA/AKBM/743 Atim Quinto 2,000
300
2,300
BAROLIMO
REA/AKBM/744 Arido Joel 15,000
2,250
17,250
REA/AKBM/745 Ogwang Johnson 10,000
1,500
11,500
REA/AKBM/746 Ojok Paul 5,000
750
5,750
REA/AKBM/747 Omari 50,000
7,500
57,500
REA/AKBM/748 Odur Richard 2,000
300
2,300
REA/AKBM/749 Edule Innocent 50,000
7,500
57,500
ARUKU LONGREA/AKBM/750 Acila Felix
92,000 13,80
0 105,800
REA/AKBM/751 Ayo Alfred 40,000
6,000
46,000
REA/AKBM/752 Otim Benedict 30,000
4,500
34,500
88
REA/AKBM/753 Laba 65,000
9,750
74,750
REA/AKBM/754 Otim Lawrence 120,000
18,000
138,000
REA/AKBM/755 Odongo Joseph 5,000
750
5,750
MYENE SUBCOUNTY
ABANG TRADING CENTRE
REA/AKBM/756 Ogang Alex 44,625 6,694
51,319
REA/AKBM/757 Adupa Quinto 20,000
3,000
23,000
REA/AKBM/758 Ameny Robert 10,000
1,500
11,500
REA/AKBM/759 Ogwang Amos 20,000
3,000
23,000
REA/AKBM/760 Adupa Peter 50,000
7,500
57,500
REA/AKBM/761 Adigi Charlse 40,000
6,000
46,000
REA/AKBM/762 Okola Geofrey 6,300
945
7,245
REA/AKBM/763 Okello Denis 20,000
3,000
23,000
REA/AKBM/764 Egach George 5,000
750
5,750
REA/AKBM/765 Okello Das 10,000
1,500
11,500
REA/AKBM/766 Owoola Bosco 45,000
6,750
51,750
REA/AKBM/767 Omara Felix 60,000
9,000
69,000
REA/AKBM/768 Clama Alex 50,000
7,500
57,500
REA/AKBM/769 Ministry of Works 62,000
9,300
71,300
REA/AKBM/770 Nyoro Bonny 10,238
1,536
11,774
REA/AKBM/771 Angwech Dorcus 60,000
9,000
69,000
89
REA/AKBM/772 Olila Ernesto 52,000
7,800
59,800
ABAKOREA/AKBM/773 Obote Jimmy
11,000 1,65
0 12,650
REA/AKBM/774 Obote Margret 10,000
1,500
11,500
REA/AKBM/775 Odongo Florence 45,000
6,750
51,750
REA/AKBM/776 Atik Robert 10,000
1,500
11,500
REA/AKBM/777 Okello Daniel 12,000
1,800
13,800
REA/AKBM/778 Wokorach Denis 20,000
3,000
23,000
REA/AKBM/779 Okello Samuel 50,000
7,500
57,500
REA/AKBM/780 Okello Tony 9,788
1,468
11,256
REA/AKBM/781 Omara Constantino 71,500
10,725
82,225
REA/AKBM/782 Oyio Sam 12,500
1,875
14,375
AMWA TRADING CENTRE
REA/AKBM/783 Okello Tony Oguta 13,875 2,081
15,956
REA/AKBM/784 Omara Akoch 30,500
4,575
35,075
REA/AKBM/785 Ayo Sam 5,000
750
5,750
REA/AKBM/786 Wana Patrick 1,000
150
1,150
REA/AKBM/787 Ogang Hassan 50,000
7,500
57,500
REA/AKBM/788 Alodo Lilly 47,000
7,050
54,050
REA/AKBM/789 Angwe Robert 20,000
3,000
23,000
REA/AKBM/790 Ojok Patrick 22,000
3,300
25,300
90
REA/AKBM/791 Ayo Kojjo 202,000
30,300
232,300
REA/AKBM/792 Okot Mustafa 75,000
11,250
86,250
REA/AKBM/793 Adupa Walter 10,000
1,500
11,500
REA/AKBM/794 Olugu Ocen 10,000
1,500
11,500
REA/AKBM/795 Ayo James 13,000
1,950
14,950
REA/AKBM/796 Opira Bonny 50,000
7,500
57,500
REA/AKBM/797 Olwa 75,000
11,250
86,250
REA/AKBM/798 Aweri Luzino 7,000
1,050
8,050
REA/AKBM/799 Odongo Pacelle 60,000
9,000
69,000
REA/AKBM/800 Egoo Richard 10,000
1,500
11,500
REA/AKBM/801 Odongo 50,000
7,500
57,500
REA/AKBM/802 Obong Jeventino 60,000
9,000
69,000
REA/AKBM/803 Olwii James 65,000
9,750
74,750
REA/AKBM/804 Olwii Robert 100,000
15,000
115,000
REA/AKBM/805 Rose Otim 285,000
42,750
327,750
REA/AKBM/806 Odongo Richard 10,000
1,500
11,500
REA/AKBM/807 Oduka Coxson 15,000
2,250
17,250
REA/AKBM/808 Odongo Geofrey 35,000
5,250
40,250
REA/AKBM/809 Awor Christine 20,000
3,000
23,000
REA/AKBM/810 Omonya Michael 287,000
43,050
330,050
REA/AKBM/811 Okello Richard 12,000
1,800
13,800
91
REA/AKBM/812 Omara J.B. 50,000
7,500
57,500
REA/AKBM/813 Oyera Moses 5,000
750
5,750
REA/AKBM/814 Omuta Justo 5,000
750
5,750
REA/AKBM/815 Opio Daniel 152,500
22,875
175,375
REA/AKBM/816 Kojjo Lawrence 127,000
19,050
146,050
REA/AKBM/817 Adong Concy 39,500
5,925
45,425
REA/AKBM/818 Okiro Ojok 30,000
4,500
34,500
AMWA HEADQUARTERSREA/AKBM/819 Ekwang Jolly
41,000 6,15
0 47,150
REA/AKBM/820 Arach Fred 27,000
4,050
31,050
REA/AKBM/821 Omara Francis 41,480
6,222
47,702
REA/AKBM/822 Omara Stephen 1,000
150
1,150
REA/AKBM/823 Adong Lilly 11,700
1,755
13,455
REA/AKBM/824 Ongari Jolly 13,000
1,950
14,950
REA/AKBM/825 Odongo Robert 10,625
1,594
12,219
REA/AKBM/826 Biron Itot 2,500
375
2,875
REA/AKBM/827 Odongo Ray 47,000
7,050
54,050
REA/AKBM/828 Olwa Elbagilo 34,500
5,175
39,675
REA/AKBM/829 Agweng Molly 72,813 10,922
83,735
REA/AKBM/830 Olwa Yakobo 18,000
2,700
20,700
REA/AKBM/831 Otim Geofrey 110,000
16,500
126,500
92
REA/AKBM/832 Omuta Victor 150,500
22,575
173,075
REA/AKBM/833 Ogwang Tony 39,000
5,850
44,850
REA/AKBM/834 Okello Lawrence 18,500
2,775
21,275
REA/AKBM/835 Angwet Sam 42,500
6,375
48,875
WARINGREA/AKBM/836 Okoyi Rose
10,200 1,53
0 11,730
REA/AKBM/837 Inyak Denis 5,000
750
5,750
REA/AKBM/838 Olet Silvesto 33,500
5,025
38,525
REA/AKBM/839 Otoo Tony 30,000
4,500
34,500
REA/AKBM/840 Achan Philiph 20,000
3,000
23,000
REA/AKBM/841 Okoko Richard 500
75
575
REA/AKBM/842 Oyengo Francis 15,000
2,250
17,250
REA/AKBM/843 Ojok Albino 98,500
14,775
113,275
REA/AKBM/844 Okello Quinto 40,000
6,000
46,000
REA/AKBM/845 Okello William 11,000
1,650
12,650
REA/AKBM/846 Aboke Robert 52,000
7,800
59,800
REA/AKBM/847 Olobo Geofrey 17,000
2,550
19,550
REA/AKBM/848 Tito Okello 44,000
6,600
50,600
REA/AKBM/849 Ayo Richard 22,000
3,300
25,300
REA/AKBM/850 Omara John 6,000
900
6,900
REA/AKBM/851 Olobo Geofrey 30,500
4,575
35,075
REA/AKBM/852 Otim Alex 4,000
600
4,600
93
MINAKULU SUBCOUNTY OPATI 'B'
REA/AKBM/853 Ekwang Richard 67,500
10,125
77,625
REA/AKBM/854 Odongo Francis 156,500
23,475
179,975
OPATI 'A'REA/AKBM/855 Ojok Hudson
15,000 2,25
0 17,250
REA/AKBM/856 Ocen Patrick 70,000
10,500
80,500
REA/AKBM/857 Aget Kalsto 64,000
9,600
73,600
REA/AKBM/858 Abanya David 59,000
8,850
67,850
REA/AKBM/859 Obua Denis 35,000
5,250
40,250
LANGOREA/AKBM/860 Ojok Peter
10,000 1,50
0 11,500
REA/AKBM/861 Opunyo Sam 68,750
10,313
79,063
REA/AKBM/862 Kiwanuka 27,000
4,050
31,050
REA/AKBM/863 Odongo Francis 30,000
4,500
34,500
REA/AKBM/864 Ogweng Richard 65,000
9,750
74,750
REA/AKBM/865 Engola Pius 13,000
1,950
14,950
REA/AKBM/866 Okiba Sam 21,000
3,150
24,150
REA/AKBM/867 Ongom Francis 21,000
3,150
24,150
REA/AKBM/868 Oloa Robert 45,000
6,750
51,750
REA/AKBM/869 Ayo Sam 10,000
1,500
11,500
REA/AKBM/870 Engola Pius 51,250
7,688
58,938
94
REA/AKBM/871 Acipa Sylvia 12,500
1,875
14,375
REA/AKBM/872 Adupa Alex 10,000
1,500
11,500
REA/AKBM/873 Engola Richard 10,750
1,613
12,363
BOBIREA/AKBM/874 Ojok Peter
90,000 13,50
0 103,500
REA/AKBM/875 Ogola Bonny 20,375
3,056
23,431
REA/AKBM/876 Abila Enestina 70,000
10,500
80,500
REA/AKBM/877 Ocen Patrick 46,500
6,975
53,475
REA/AKBM/878 Kilama 123,000
18,450
141,450
REA/AKBM/879 Sabina Kiba 575,000
86,250
661,250
REA/AKBM/880 Odongo Walter 5,000
750
5,750
REA/AKBM/881 Okello Lawrence 10,000
1,500
11,500
REA/AKBM/882 Otwal Lawrence 47,000
7,050
54,050
REA/AKBM/883 Mone David 75,000
11,250
86,250
REA/AKBM/884 Ojok Robert 10,000
1,500
11,500
REA/AKBM/885 Otim Moses 10,000
1,500
11,500
TEYAOREA/AKBM/886 Lia Richard
1,000 15
0 1,150
REA/AKBM/887 Oryenyo Joel 44,500
6,675
51,175
REA/AKBM/888 Okello Geofrey 23,150
3,473
26,623
OMOLO
95
REA/AKBM/889 Atiro Shabin 13,875 2,081
15,956
REA/AKBM/890 Awuma Loy 11,875 1,781
13,656
REA/AKBM/891 Ogwang Robert 22,750
3,413
26,163
REA/AKBM/892 Nyero Moses 9,000
1,350
10,350
REA/AKBM/893 Opio Patrick 176,688 26,503
203,191
REA/AKBM/894 Otoo Quinto 157,000
23,550
180,550
REA/AKBM/895 Odongo Simon 142,500
21,375
163,875
REA/AKBM/896 Oyet Silvio 56,000
8,400
64,400
REA/AKBM/897 Omara Bob 43,000
6,450
49,450
REA/AKBM/898 Okodi Charlse 76,000
11,400
87,400
REA/AKBM/899 Bongo Felix 140,000
21,000
161,000
REA/AKBM/900 Awuma Grace 36,500
5,475
41,975
REA/AKBM/901 Abor David 40,000
6,000
46,000
ALATI 'A'REA/AKBM/902 Bongo Felix
44,000 6,60
0 50,600
REA/AKBM/903 Onyik Geofrey Paul 36,000
5,400
41,400
REA/AKBM/904 Awar George 500
75
575
REA/AKBM/905 Ocen Denis 49,705
7,456
57,161
REA/AKBM/906 Ogwang Alterio 31,250
4,688
35,938
REA/AKBM/907 Ogom Bosco 15,313 2,297
17,610
REA/AKBM/908 Ogwang Alterio 8,125
1,219
9,344
96
REA/AKBM/909 Ogwete Miseari 1,000
150
1,150
REA/AKBM/910 Ogwang David 33,000
4,950
37,950
ARAK EASTREA/AKBM/911 Okite
17,000 2,55
0 19,550
REA/AKBM/912 Acen Selina 32,000
4,800
36,800
REA/AKBM/913 Ocoo Tom 40,000
6,000
46,000
REA/AKBM/914 Jooreye 20,000
3,000
23,000
REA/AKBM/915 Ogwang Peter 20,000
3,000
23,000
REA/AKBM/916 Ebong Alex 50,000
7,500
57,500
REA/AKBM/917 Erem Moses 46,000
6,900
52,900
REA/AKBM/918 Awal Francis 79,500
11,925
91,425
REA/AKBM/919 Ogwang Cipriano 2,000
300
2,300
REA/AKBM/920 Owiny Vicent 25,000
3,750
28,750
REA/AKBM/921 Erem Robert 20,000
3,000
23,000
REA/AKBM/922 Okello Charlse 120,000
18,000
138,000
REA/AKBM/923 Odeya Bosco 100,000
15,000
115,000
REA/AKBM/924 Ojok Leo 170,000
25,500
195,500
REA/AKBM/925 Erem Geofrey 9,000
1,350
10,350
REA/AKBM/926 Ojok Bosco 65,000
9,750
74,750
REA/AKBM/927 Ayo Alex 10,000
1,500
11,500
REA/AKBM/928 Obang Patrick 70,000
10,500
80,500
97
REA/AKBM/929 Madam Ana Akao 1,000
150
1,150
REA/AKBM/930 Dengo Ejebyo 155,000
23,250
178,250
REA/AKBM/931 Okello Geofrey 106,000
15,900
121,900
REA/AKBM/932 Owo John Odyambo 37,500
5,625
43,125
ODYANYOREA/AKBM/933 Anyuru Richard
4,000 60
0 4,600
AKUKI EASTREA/AKBM/934 Ogwere Vincent
306,000 45,90
0 351,900
REA/AKBM/935 Olobo Kasim 30,875
4,631
35,506
REA/AKBM/936 Oyepa Simon 24,915 3,737
28,652
REA/AKBM/937 Menya Christopher 4,000
600
4,600
REA/AKBM/938 Okunu Nickson 25,000
3,750
28,750
REA/AKBM/939 Welo Vicent 101,500
15,225
116,725
REA/AKBM/940 Menya Christopher 12,000
1,800
13,800
REA/AKBM/941 Ayo Patrick 4,024
604
4,628
REA/AKBM/942 Awio Beatrice 18,870
2,831
21,701
REA/AKBM/943 Moto Wilfred 73,000
10,950
83,950
REA/AKBM/944 Akulu Aidah 7,400
1,110
8,510
REA/AKBM/945 Apio Lucy 3,000
450
3,450
REA/AKBM/946 Ogwang Simon Peter 29,500
4,425
33,925
REA/AKBM/947 Asio Betty 4,400
660
5,060
REA/AKBM/948 Odida Francis 25,000
3,750
28,750
98
REA/AKBM/949 Yakobo Olugu 24,500
3,675
28,175
REA/AKBM/950 Onyeki George 16,000
2,400
18,400
REA/AKBM/951 Otoo Tom 12,000
1,800
13,800
REA/AKBM/952 Alele Jusphine 50,000
7,500
57,500
REA/AKBM/953 Tile Geofrey 1,500
225
1,725
REA/AKBM/954 Oyo Lawrence 140,800
21,120
161,920
REA/AKBM/955 Ocen Fred 12,500
1,875
14,375
REA/AKBM/956 Ochong Richard 7,000
1,050
8,050
REA/AKBM/957 Okello Martin 3,000
450
3,450
REA/AKBM/958 Odongo Jasper 10,000
1,500
11,500
REA/AKBM/959 Acut Jimmy 20,000
3,000
23,000
REA/AKBM/960 Okello Richard 11,770
1,766
13,536
REA/AKBM/961 Obua Susan 14,375 2,156
16,531
REA/AKBM/962 Arawu Rose 60,875
9,131
70,006
ALOLEKWEREA/AKBM/963 Oming Moses
26,500 3,97
5 30,475
REA/AKBM/964 Oyugi Mark 93,663 14,049
107,712
REA/AKBM/965 Oyugi Mark 46,950
7,043
53,993
NGUTCATIREA/AKBM/966 Joyce Obong
79,000 11,85
0 90,850
REA/AKBM/967 Oryet Jimmy 80,000
12,000
92,000
99
REA/AKBM/968 Adoch Florence 117,875 17,681
135,556
REA/AKBM/969 Owani Bosco 30,000
4,500
34,500
REA/AKBM/970 Oryem Denis 5,000
750
5,750
REA/AKBM/971 Owani Alfonse 20,000
3,000
23,000
REA/AKBM/972 Christine Magoti 20,000
3,000
23,000
REA/AKBM/973 Ojok Santo 20,000
3,000
23,000
REA/AKBM/974 Moro Lawrence 35,000
5,250
40,250
REA/AKBM/975 Albina Otim 10,000
1,500
11,500
REA/AKBM/976 Otim Wilbert 139,063 20,859
159,922
REA/AKBM/977 Omara Alfred 171,125 25,669
196,794
REA/AKBM/978 Okello Jimmy 7,975
1,196
9,171
REA/AKBM/979 Opwonya Patrick 8,388
1,258
9,646
REA/AKBM/980 Byarugaba Richard 2,000
300
2,300
REA/AKBM/981 Moro Francis 8,000
1,200
9,200
REA/AKBM/982 Sylvester Ogwal 10,000
1,500
11,500
REA/AKBM/983 Ongulu Otim 90,500
13,575
104,075
REA/AKBM/984 Omoro Serogam 57,000
8,550
65,550
COO PE BWONEREA/AKBM/985 Adel Primary School
232,500 34,87
5 267,375
REA/AKBM/986 Minakulu Parish 1,857,375 278,606
2,135,981
MINAKULU TRADING CENTRE 'B'
100
REA/AKBM/987 Ogwang Emmanuel 60,000
9,000
69,000
REA/AKBM/988 Odongo Julius Peter 36,000
5,400
41,400
REA/AKBM/989 Omara Leo 121,500
18,225
139,725
REA/AKBM/990 Atim Agnes 56,000
8,400
64,400
REA/AKBM/991 Olaka Tony 50,000
7,500
57,500
REA/AKBM/992 Okai Wilbert 80,000
12,000
92,000
REA/AKBM/993 Oryang Geofrey 60,000
9,000
69,000
REA/AKBM/994 Ogwete Vicent 31,000
4,650
35,650
REA/AKBM/995 Bala Abdalah 25,000
3,750
28,750
REA/AKBM/996 Agwata Tom 10,000
1,500
11,500
REA/AKBM/997 Agwai Raymond 351,375 52,706
404,081
REA/AKBM/998 Ogwal Francis 63,505
9,526
73,031
REA/AKBM/999 Olet Richard 80,406
12,061
92,467
REA/AKBM/1000 Otim Alfred 31,000
4,650
35,650
REA/AKBM/1001 Okori Lawrence 35,000
5,250
40,250
MINAKULU TRADING CENTRE 'A'
REA/AKBM/1002 Opio Lawrence 185,500
27,825
213,325
REA/AKBM/1003 Okot Denis 7,000
1,050
8,050
REA/AKBM/1004 Apunyu Tony 12,000
1,800
13,800
REA/AKBM/1005 Opio Albino 14,500
2,175
16,675
REA/AKBM/1006 Omonyi Tony 11,500
1,725
13,225
101
REA/AKBM/1007 Oyugi Robert 50,000
7,500
57,500
REA/AKBM/1008 Okello Ceaser 92,500
13,875
106,375
REA/AKBM/1009 Opio Walter 20,000
3,000
23,000
REA/AKBM/1010 Lagada Silvesto 7,000
1,050
8,050
REA/AKBM/1011 Otoo Patrick 32,000
4,800
36,800
REA/AKBM/1012 Ocho Richard 22,500
3,375
25,875
REA/AKBM/1013 Akai Stella 2,000
300
2,300
REA/AKBM/1014 Angulu Gaetano 20,000
3,000
23,000
REA/AKBM/1015 Ekong Alfonsio 50,000
7,500
57,500
REA/AKBM/1016 Akao Stella 18,000
2,700
20,700
REA/AKBM/1017 Okumu Rose 20,000
3,000
23,000
REA/AKBM/1018 Oryang Fabio 50,000
7,500
57,500
REA/AKBM/1019 Okech Philiph 20,000
3,000
23,000
REA/AKBM/1020 Amenya Alex 20,000
3,000
23,000
REA/AKBM/1021 Adupa Doreen 20,000
3,000
23,000
REA/AKBM/1022 Obal Geofrey 20,000
3,000
23,000
REA/AKBM/1023 Akol Alfonse 84,000
12,600
96,600
REA/AKBM/1024 Ituk Sipi 10,000
1,500
11,500
REA/AKBM/1025 Ojera Martin 25,000
3,750
28,750
REA/AKBM/1026 Ogwang Sam 10,000
1,500
11,500
REA/AKBM/1027 Ogom Robert 5,000
750
5,750
102
REA/AKBM/1028 Ogwang Joe 20,000
3,000
23,000
REA/AKBM/1029 Olobo John 40,000
6,000
46,000
REA/AKBM/1030 Obote Richard 20,000
3,000
23,000
REA/AKBM/1031 Atiang Lachere 45,000
6,750
51,750
REA/AKBM/1032 Orech Nelson 62,000
9,300
71,300
REA/AKBM/1033 Okot Christine 3,500
525
4,025
REA/AKBM/1034 Odongo Lwanga 47,000
7,050
54,050
REA/AKBM/1035 Ayo Nelson 45,000
6,750
51,750
REA/AKBM/1036 Ojok Innocent 12,000
1,800
13,800
REA/AKBM/1037 Owuma 35,000
5,250
40,250
REA/AKBM/1038 Okello Charlse 29,500
4,425
33,925
REA/AKBM/1039 Bua Yakobo 60,000
9,000
69,000
REA/AKBM/1040 Alobo Paul 44,000
6,600
50,600
REA/AKBM/1041 Okello Justine 30,000
4,500
34,500
AROMONYONGOREA/AKBM/1042 Akwin
5,000 75
0 5,750
REA/AKBM/1043 Okello Justine 21,000
3,150
24,150
REA/AKBM/1044 Omodo Geofrey 45,000
6,750
51,750
REA/AKBM/1045 Acako Anjuleta 2,000
300
2,300
REA/AKBM/1046 Adwong Kilara 5,000
750
5,750
REA/AKBM/1047 Odongo George 10,000
1,500
11,500
103
REA/AKBM/1048 Omach Geofrey 50,000
7,500
57,500
REA/AKBM/1049 Omara Douglas 52,500
7,875
60,375
REA/AKBM/1050 Oryang Dominic 12,500
1,875
14,375
REA/AKBM/1051 Bua Thomas 100,000
15,000
115,000
REA/AKBM/1052 Okello Nobert 77,500
11,625
89,125
REA/AKBM/1053 Apolo Halima 30,000
4,500
34,500
REA/AKBM/1054 Ogwal Denis Dicken 30,000
4,500
34,500
REA/AKBM/1055 Ongom Raymond 39,500
5,925
45,425
REA/AKBM/1056 Okello Innocent 181,000
27,150
208,150
REA/AKBM/1057 Gabriel Oling Olang 254,000
38,100
292,100
REA/AKBM/1058 Ongom Basil 409,500
61,425
470,925
REA/AKBM/1059 Alobo John 47,000
7,050
54,050
REA/AKBM/1060 Opio Bul 32,000
4,800
36,800
REA/AKBM/1061 Ongom Geofrey 290,000
43,500
333,500
REA/AKBM/1062 Ocen Peter 9,000
1,350
10,350
REA/AKBM/1063 Ongom Geofrey 2,038,000
305,700
2,343,700
BOBI SUBCOUNTY IDIPO
REA/AKBM/1064 Achan Jusphine 117,500
17,625
135,125
REA/AKBM/1065 Cathrine Janjok 57,000
8,550
65,550
REA/AKBM/1066 Oryema Peter 12,000
1,800
13,800
104
REA/AKBM/1067 Owor .A. Thomas 43,000
6,450
49,450
REA/AKBM/1068 Nyeko Kenedy 106,000
15,900
121,900
REA/AKBM/1069 Anek Marther 150,000
22,500
172,500
REA/AKBM/1070 Ongom Alfred 175,000
26,250
201,250
REA/AKBM/1071 Inyang Stephen 33,375 5,006
38,381
REA/AKBM/1072 Karen Okello 4,000
600
4,600
REA/AKBM/1073 Owor Ray 38,000
5,700
43,700
REA/AKBM/1074 Bhazil Opoka 4,000
600
4,600
REA/AKBM/1075 Akuru David 5,000
750
5,750
REA/AKBM/1076 Ongier-giu Kenedy 129,000
19,350
148,350
REA/AKBM/1077 Okello Onyany 7,000
1,050
8,050
REA/AKBM/1078 Acaye Goddy 2,000
300
2,300
REA/AKBM/1079 Okumu Alfred 32,000
4,800
36,800
REA/AKBM/1080 Mohammed 24,000
3,600
27,600
REA/AKBM/1081 Akello Rose 56,000
8,400
64,400
REA/AKBM/1082 Agwayi Opoka 10,000
1,500
11,500
REA/AKBM/1083 Akii Jasper 7,000
1,050
8,050
OBALOWATREA/AKBM/1084 Odongo Isaac
29,000 4,35
0 33,350
REA/AKBM/1085 Sarafino Ochong 2,500
375
2,875
REA/AKBM/1086 Atoo Geofrey 7,000
1,050
8,050
105
REA/AKBM/1087 Adero Neko 18,000
2,700
20,700
REA/AKBM/1088 Ojok (Son of Olugu) 7,000
1,050
8,050
REA/AKBM/1089 Akao Cecelia 7,000
1,050
8,050
REA/AKBM/1090 Onek Caro 4,000
600
4,600
REA/AKBM/1091 Okidi Richard 6,500
975
7,475
REA/AKBM/1092 Opio Anania 4,500
675
5,175
REA/AKBM/1093 Sunday Mpairwe Patrick
8,509
1,276
9,785
REA/AKBM/1094 Ogwal Patrick 11,419 1,713
13,132
REA/AKBM/1095 Mariano Odoki 25,000
3,750
28,750
AWII MON WARDREA/AKBM/1096 Ogwal Fred
9,500 1,42
5 10,925
REA/AKBM/1097 St. Thomas P/Sch. Minakulu
84,000
12,600
96,600
REA/AKBM/1098 Palwo Parish Minakulu 36,500
5,475
41,975
REA/AKBM/1099 Olinga Boniface 20,500
3,075
23,575
REA/AKBM/1100 Odaga Bai 223,700
33,555
257,255
REA/AKBM/1101 Odongo Acha 8,813
1,322
10,135
REA/AKBM/1102 Obak Richard 38,340
5,751
44,091
REA/AKBM/1103 Ayela Patrick 14,100
2,115
16,215
REA/AKBM/1104 Okello Acit 60,875
9,131
70,006
REA/AKBM/1105 Komakech Moses 46,500
6,975
53,475
REA/AKBM/1106 Ojok Odongo Opuk 14,750
2,213
16,963
REA/AKBM/1107 Omara Ajulio 43,200
6,480
49,680
106
REA/AKBM/1108 Ochen Mark 31,125 4,669
35,794
REA/AKBM/1109 Amone Alice 52,000
7,800
59,800
KULU OTITREA/AKBM/1110 Odongo Lwanga
157,500 23,62
5 181,125
REA/AKBM/1111 Okot Nuru 62,125 9,319
71,444
REA/AKBM/1112 Omony Geofrey 69,550
10,433
79,983
REA/AKBM/1113 Tereza 49,250
7,388
56,638
REA/AKBM/1114 Odong Sudan 51,250
7,688
58,938
REA/AKBM/1115 Okello Ceaser 27,250
4,088
31,338
REA/AKBM/1116 Obak Vincent 21,750
3,263
25,013
REA/AKBM/1117 Ameny Peter 19,000
2,850
21,850
REA/AKBM/1118 Aneka Ekuka Camilo 35,000
5,250
40,250
REA/AKBM/1119 Otim Albino 15,000
2,250
17,250
REA/AKBM/1120 Banya Otim 274,000
41,100
315,100
REA/AKBM/1121 Awio Innocent 67,000
10,050
77,050
REA/AKBM/1122 Ongole Celestino 1,500
225
1,725
REA/AKBM/1123 Atine Ongole 17,500
2,625
20,125
REA/AKBM/1124 Adoch Betorina 48,125 7,219
55,344
REA/AKBM/1125 Obonyo Ceke 32,000
4,800
36,800
REA/AKBM/1126 Labeja 136,000
20,400
156,400
REA/AKBM/1127 Omara Rufino 117,500
17,625
135,125
107
PATO TRADING CENTREREA/AKBM/1128 Amongi Grace
5,500 82
5 6,325
REA/AKBM/1129 Okot Felix 43,000
6,450
49,450
REA/AKBM/1130 Odongo Boniface 2,000
300
2,300
REA/AKBM/1131 Atube Nelson 5,000
750
5,750
REA/AKBM/1132 Opio Jasper 41,000
6,150
47,150
REA/AKBM/1133 Opira Simon 374,500
56,175
430,675
REA/AKBM/1134 Obur 36,000
5,400
41,400
REA/AKBM/1135 Alonyo Doreen 23,513 3,527
27,040
REA/AKBM/1136 Okello Abic 44,013
6,602
50,615
REA/AKBM/1137 Otoo Bosco 6,500
975
7,475
REA/AKBM/1138 Ogwang Tony Blair 4,875
731
5,606
REA/AKBM/1139 Odongo Moses 2,000
300
2,300
REA/AKBM/1140 Olango Michael and Oyuru John
25,000
3,750
28,750
REA/AKBM/1141 Oyuru John 44,000
6,600
50,600
REA/AKBM/1142 Bobi Subcounty Headquarters
19,000
2,850
21,850
REA/AKBM/1143 Bobi Community Polytechnic
202,500
30,375
232,875
GRAND TOTAL (USH) 95,675,252
108
ANNEX 2: MINUTES OF COMMUNITY MEETINGS Date Location Concerns Raised Recommendations02/09/10 Aboke
MowlemIssue of putting up a transformer rose, who will be concerned with putting it up. Local leaders suggest government does that in order to truly benefit the people.
Concern raised that since independence this issue of a step down generator has been raised but nothing done about it.
Question asked that since the power line is on one side of the road, will the people on the opposite side get power.
Issue raised that the major problem of Aboke is a step down, is needed for the improvement of Aboke health center, secondary school, primary school, trading center. All these
Members were informed that everyone will benefit no matter which side of the road they are on.
REA to follow up in project execution
109
show that the area is developing but no power.
02/09/10 Loro Sub County
Concerns about whether they will be given a transformer.
Question asked about whether they will get security lights in their areas.
Issue about the questions that the social team will ask, that after being asked these questions will something be done for them after they give out their details.
Question asked that since the power line will pass nearby their school (primary) will government give the primary school power.
Question asked that the transformer to provide power in the area, will it be bought by government or the project affected persons.
Relevant district authorities to follow up
Communities were informed that information would be used to design compensation packages for affected persons as well as livelihood restoration activities.
Communities were informed that the government will provide the transformer.
110
L.C.11 vice chairman, Odera Alfred in his closing remarks encouraged community to cooperate with team, and to pass on the message to those who are not around.
03/09/10 Ongor/Entebbe Trading Centre
Member asked whether they will be given work to help in putting up the power line.
Concerned about crops destroyed, how they will be compensated.
Issue of whether this project is political, informed that it is from government and has nothing to do with politics.
Issue of having poles on one side of the road, does that mean those on the other side will not get power.
Will this power line supply public institutions like churches, hospitals and schools
Contractor should give the affected communities first priority in job recruitment. REA to monitor progress of such positive benefits
Details are highlighted in this report
More sensitization on the role of REA in service delivery
Community members informed that most service delivery is driven by the needs of communities and these will be taken into accountCommunities were informed that given that impacts of the project are low it is
111
Concern of if people refuse to allow power officials to work or destroy property on their land.
Mr. Buluro area councilor said that the people of this area have welcomed the idea of power; his only request is that we employ the locals and buy poles from them to benefit the members.
unlikely that many people will be affected
03/09/10 Iyani Will crops found in the right of way be compensated?
That sometime back when another group came and put up cables, dug trenches they were told it was a road reserve, no one was paid.
That if a pole passes in someone’s compound or above someone’s house, what will be done?
Are compensation rates negotiable,
Informed they will and particulars of which ones exactly.
Informed that they will move the poles and avoid the houses.
Informed that trees and poles have fixed values that government has set.
Community health 112
can PAP’s bargain?
What if a pole falls and kills someone, will the government compensate the affected one.
and safety mitigation measures to be highlighted in the ESIA
04/09/10 Gwokoneno Issue raised that in the past, villages around where given a transformer but they did not get. Wants to know if it will be the same this time. Asks why they do not put a transformer in the trading center.
Community members wondered whether they would be charged for poles.
Will this project provide the youth with jobs. Suggestion made that villagers are willing to do the cutting of trees, clearing and digging holes.
What if the power line is passing over the graveyard?
Informed that the transformer put in Inya will supply a big area, it does not necessarily mean every area or village gets a transformer.
Informed that if they want power in their houses they will have to buy poles for themselves and that rural electrification will be in charge of that.
Informed that yes, there is cutting of trees, putting poles. Much cheaper to get workers from here.
Informed that it is not likely because the line is passing in the road reserve.
113
Concern of whether those affected along the line coming from the PTC are going to be compensated.
04/09/2010 Loro Township Are we going to give transformers to every trading center?
What is the method of compensation, what is going to be compensated exactly?
Complain that there is no transformer in Amido Trading center.
Members wondered how soon the project was going to start?
Are the PAP’s going to be paid after the project or before?
Incase poles or wires break and destroy someone’s property, how will they be compensated.
Informed of the different area where the transformers are going to be put.
Informed on what crops will be considered and
Informed that after this exercise of valuation and establishing the cost of construction then it will be begin.
Informed that before the project starts.
114
04/09/2010 Obangongera Trading Centre
Chairman L.C.1 asks whether they are going to pay for the coming power line or the old one as well.
When the power line passes over a house is it destroyed.
Will security lights be provided?
Will we be supplying power to people’s homes?
Will there be a gap between the existing power line and new one?
That the previous power line planners did not compensate them, what procedures should they use in case they have complaints they want to pass on?
When will they start paying for this project?
What rates do
Informed that we are concerned with the new one.
Informed that no house will be destroyed.
Informed that it is up to the community to organize themselves for this.
Informed that it is up to them to apply to REA and be connected to the grid.
Informed that they have to meet.
A grievance mechanism has been proposed in this report and will be disclosed to community members
Informed after valuation and before they put up the poles.
Informed that they 115
they use for compensation and what are they.
Are surveyors going to pay them some small money when they pass in their areas or land?
can get the rates at the district office.
06/09/2010 Odike TC When a pole falls on a house, will they compensate?
Will those on the opposite side of the road get power?
What of having power in the houses?
Will there be security lights put up?
What if the mango tree is in the way of the line, is one allowed to prune it instead of having it cut down?
Informed that rural electrification will compensate them
Informed that they will have to apply to REA
Informed it is up to the town council to put up that.
Informed that no, it will cut down if it is in the way.
07/09/2010 Kamdini Sub County Headquarters
When a pole falls on a house, will they compensate?
Where will the surveyors start from?
Informed that rural electrification will compensate them
116
Where will the transformers be located?
Does the community pay a cost to get power in the homes?
What if one wants to build on their land but there is a pole?
Informed of the different areas where they will be.
Informed that REA is responsible for connecting them with power in their homes
Informed to build 15meters from the pole.
07/09/2010 Aruko Long Trading Centre
What if the pole is on the house?
What trees will be compensated?
When will the putting up of poles start?
That the community is ready to provide labour.
What are the compesation rates for the trees?
Concern of manual labour brought up, they kept insisting that they should be considered.
What if one does not agree with
Informed that the pole will not be placed on the house.
Informed that all those trees that individual benefits from will be compensated
Informed that right now they are just planning for the route where the power line will pass.
Informed that the district land board is responsible for that.
Informed that the land board first comes to the ground
117
the compensation rates paid and refuses what’s being offered. What should they do next? Should they go to court?
before rates are fixed.
08/09/2010 Amwa Trading Centre
What about the grave yards, how do they affect electricity?
Are we going to provide them with security lines?
Are trees that are going to be cut down going to taken by us or will remain?
What if houses are in the right of way, what will be done?
Will construction of poles and putting up power lines provide us with employment?
If one is on the opposite side of the road where there are no poles, will one get power.
When will the construction start?
Informed that poles will not be put on graves
Informed the local council will be in charge of that.
Informed that the trees will remain there’s and they can do as they please with them.
Informed poles will be move to avoid the houses.
Informed yes there are opportunities to employ them.
118
What will be the cost of getting a plow from one side of the road to another?
That they should be given a grace period to use power of one month for free.
Soon after the entire field information is collected.
Informed REA will be in charge of that.
08/09/2010 Aminomir Trading Centre
Why are some trees that are used for food not also valued like others?
Is compensation going to districts or owners themselves?
How much will it cost to have power in our houses?
Are community members going to be considered for some work when the construction starts?
Informed that others tress grow naturally and are not planted
Informed owners themselves
Informed that we do not know the prices but if used extravagantly then they will be charged highly.
08/09/2010 Awe Betty Trading Centre
What if the poles take a huge area of the land?
What if a pole is in line with a mango tree will it be cut down?
Informed that the poles will be in the road reserve.
119
Can REA buy the poles from us, informed they have to talk to rural electrification and REA for that? What is being used for payment, cards or meter box
How long will it take for the project to start?
With power in the house, how much will it cost?
Informed as soon as we take the report back and it is approved.
Informed it will depend on how much power is being used.
09/09/2010 Oyam District What about people’s houses where the wire will pass.
Who would be in charge of paying the electricity bills?
One member was told that people have already been paid; he is asking whether it is true.
Will the locals be involved in the project?
The team will put that into record but no payment will be made unless there is a destruction or damage caused on the structure.
The bills are to be paid by the beneficiary of the power, just like water
Informed no and that the payment will be done after the assessment after the field data has been processed and presented to the government and World Bank.
Informed it will be the contractors work to decide.
120
What if one wants power in his house, will the government provide for that?
What is the extent of the land taken by the line?
How long will the power take to reach Minakulu tc?
Will they provide a generator metre box for all?
In case of damage caused by the power, who will be responsible?
Informed no and that they have to apply to REA.
Informed only 10m from tarmac.
Informed no, and that anyone who wants power will apply to REA for the metre box as a routine.
The government will be responsible.
09/09/2010 Bobi Sub County
What about trading centers that are off the main road; what plan is there for them?
When will the actual project start? There are many houses within the 10m length.
What if the pole is to be placed where the house is, what will be done?
The transformers distributed are effective to distribute enough power to the surrounding area the locals to write to REA if they need power in their homes.It has already started assessment of damaged and payment to be done before poles is put up.
The house will be spared and poles adjusted. However all structures will be
121
noted during the assessment as earlier explained.
09/09/2010 Pato Trading Centre
Will the power serve only one side of the road? No it will serve all sides.
In all, the community leaders demonstrated their need for power and promised to cooperate when needed.
09/09/2010 Minakulu T.C Will there be need to pay for the poles on the opposite side off the road?
Who will be in charge of putting up security lights?
How much is the collection fee to other households?
Why don’t they pay for cereal crops?
How long will the programme take to start?
Someone has been asking for 20,000 for bringing electricity per
No it is in the project that those poles be distributed along the road.
The security light is managed and paid for by the town council or the community as is done in other countries.Informed that we do not know and that REA is in charge of that?Informed that they easily harvest and grow them, they have short gestation periods and farmers can easily continue to grow the crops.Informed that it started already. Informed that it is not politics but a development programme.
Informed that no money will be asked for this project except when
122
household. is it part of the exercise.?
individuals want power to their houses which will be at a later stage.
10/09/2010 Wirao Trading Centre
What will be done to the residents on the opposite side of the road?
A school is located 8km from the main road. Will the government provide the school with power?
How will the prices of trees be established?
What if the poles position rests on a house what will be done?What if the transformer is not strong enough?What if the wire breaks and causes damage. Who will be responsible?If the transformer is damaged who will be
Transformers will be placed to step down power and this line will run on the opposite side of the road to distribute the power to the households.Informed that, this project is limited to the main road and a few specified links, Anymore extensions will be through a written request to REA office.The valuers will use compensation rates made by the district to value all the agriculture and forest produce. The valuers do not decide on their own. The poles will be extended away from the houses.
During construction it will be the contractor, after that it will be government to pay for the damages.
123
responsible?10/09/2010 Atapara
HospitalThe hospital requires more voltage than the 200kv given because more institutions and machines are being introduced in the area.There should be community involvement in work such as digging holes and clearing the way.When will the project start?
Where will power be tapped from?
When will the crops be counted?
Will they consider newly planted crops / trees?Who will connect power to their houses?Are we allowed to continue using the land / road reserve after the wires have been placed?
Soon, though payment will be first be done.
From corner molem, moving along the tarmac; at ayer t c, a branch or link will be made to the hospital.
Starting next week; but the locals will be informed first through the L C 1.
Yes; from seedlings to maturity all will be considered.
The individuals will hire qualified technicians to do the work for them.
Yes they can, but do not grow crops/ trees that will grow tall and cause damage to the wires.
124
ANNEX 3: LAND OWNER /TENANT/LICENSEE VERIFICATION QUESTIONNAIRE33 KV Ayer-Kamdini-Minakulu-Bobi Distribution LINE
Consultant: RESCO
Names of Enumerator....................................................................Date………………………………….
Section 1: Personal Identification
Project Affected Person
Age completed years
Sex Marital Status
Highest level of Education
Tribe Occupation Religion Serial no. on PAP’s copy
Date of enumeration
Section 2: Location of Information
District County Sub-County Parish LC II Village Plot Ref Designation
Section 3: Ownership and Particulars of the affected Person
What is your status in relation to the Land ownership?
How did you acquire this land?
1= Bought
Which year did you acquire the land?
From whom?
Give Name
Do you possess any land Title or agreement for ownership or tenancy?
How do you hold this land?
1= In possession of title.
For how long have you been on this affected plot?
1= Since
What is the predominant land tenure system in this Sub county?
1 =
Is there any encumbrances on this land like;
1= yes, Claim by: family members.
2= Yes,
What types of structures/Fixtures are on this land?
1= Residential
If tenant how much do you pay per month?
1= Owner
2= Licensee
3= Tenant
4= Co-owner
5= Co-Tenant
6= Others (Specify)
2= Renting
3= Inherited
4= Given as a gift.
5= Just settled
6= Other (Specify)
1= Land Title
2=Agreement
3=Tenancy
2= Inherited but no title.
3=Tenant on titled land.
4= On public land (customary)
5= Other Specify
birth.
2= 0-10 years
3=10-20 years
4= over 20 years
Customary
2= Freehold tenure.
3= Leasehold
4= Mailo land
5= Other specify
mortgage/lien.
3= No, all documents available.
4= No, and no documentation available.
5= I don’t know
6= Other specify
only.
2= Residential and small business.
3=Small business
Do you have land holdings elsewhere?
Have you buried family members on this land? If yes, how many
Are they in the right of or way leave?
Do you wish to relocate them?
Which village?
Is it one of the land holdings?
Indicate the main source of income
Secondary source of Income
Other activities done on this land that generate income.
Section 4: Demographic Profile of affected Household
Name Sex
1 = M
2 = F
Age (yrs)
Relationship to HH Head
1 = Father
2= Wife
3= Son
4= Daughter
5= Sister
6= Brother
What is your/their main occupation?
1= Private formal/manufacturing
2= Private formal/service
3= Private formal/retail
4= Student
5= Private informal/service
How far is the work/school from here?
Record as stated
2= Not Applicable
How do you/they/get to work?
1= At site
2= by public means
3= by personal vehicle
4= by bicycle/motorcycle
What is your marital status?
1= Married/cohabiting
2= Single never married.
3= Single separate/ Divorced
What is the highest level of education you/ XX attained/currently in ?
1= None
2= Primary school
3= Ordinary Level
Of what religious affiliation is this HH?
1= Catholic
2= Protestant
3= Islam
2
7= Grand father
8= Grand mother
9= Other
6= Private informal/retail
7= Private Agricultural
8= Public Government
9= Non-governmental
10= Religious
11= Not employment
5= by foot
6= in boarding school
7= other specify
8= Not applicable
4= Widow / widower
4= Tertiary Level
4= Other specify
Section 5: General Information concerning children
How many children are below5 years old?
How many children are going to schools?
How many are in primary level? How many are in secondary level?
How many are at University?
By what means do they get to school?
1= Walk
2= by public means
3= by private means
4= Others
Do you have any handicapped persons living in this HH?
1 = Yes
2 = No
What is the nature of handicap?
1= Blind
2= Deaf/dumb
3= Crippled
4= Mental
5= Other
What is the type of health facility in this area?
1= Hospital
2= Health facility IV
3= Health facility III
4= Health facility II
5= Health facility I
Is the healthy facility located along the power line right of way?
1= Yes
2= No
3=Don’t know
How far is the nearest Health Unit?
1= Less than 5km
2= 5 – 10km
3= 10 or more
What is the major source of food for this household?
1= Buy from the market
2= Grown on this parcel
3= Grown elsewhere
4= Other (Specify
3
Section 6: Production Systems
If grown on parcel, what proportion contributes HH consumption? (Elaborate on the scale of 10 and get the number that contributes to total consumption)
Does this HH keep any animals or birds?
1= Yes
2= No
If yes, which animals?
1= Birds Poultry
2= Piggery
3= Goats
4= Cows
5= Other (specify)
If cultivation of crops, what are the main crops grown and how much does the household earn from each crop?
1=Maize
2=Sweet potatoes
3=Cassava
4=Beans
5=Rice
6=Other (specify)
Where are these crops grown? (Tick in the appropriate box)
1=In the background of the household
2=Farm
3=Along the power line right of way
Who owns the land on which you grow crops?
1=HH head
2=Uncle
3=Wife
4=Clan
5=Landlord
6=Other (Specify)
What is the land tenure for your land?
1=Customary
2=Freehold tenure
3=Leasehold
4=Mailo
5= Kibanja
6=Other (Specify).
Where do you usually sell your produce?
1= Don’t sell at all
2= Local Market
3= Outside market (far from home)
4= Outside the district
What problems have you experienced in your production activities? (Multiple response)
1= Drought
2= Lack of sufficient land
3= Lack of tools, like hoes
If livestock, what are the main animals and how much does the household earn from each livestock
(Give details in table below)
Where do you graze the livestock?
1= Private own land
2= Private borrowed land
3= Customary land
4= Public land
5= Hired
What problems have you experienced in livestock rearing?
1=drought
2=lack of pasture/land
3=Animal disease
4= cattle theft
5=Expensive drugs
4
5= Others (specify 4= Lack of markets
5= Lack of good access to markets.
6= Others (specify) 6=No help from Govt
Section 6: Socio Network and Support System
Given the portion of your land that is marked for construction of a transmission line, do you think that you need to move to another place?
1= Yes
2= No
Where would you move to?
0=Not applicable
1=On same piece of land
2=Buy land else where
3=To the city
4=Further upcountry
5=Other (Specify)
Please give reasons for the location preferred…..
0=Not Applicable
1=Land is mine
2=It is cheaper
3=Schools and hospitals near
4=My clan stays there
5=Other (Specify)
How would you like your situation handled?
1=Compensation in cash
2=Land for land compensation
3=House built for me
4=Other (specify)
Do you have any relatives living in this Sub-county?
1= Yes
2= No
Do they live/is it within this parish?
1= Yes
2= No
Do you belong to any community organization in this parish?
1= Yes
2= No
From whom do you normally seek advice to solve your personal and HH problems?
(Multiple response)
1= Sister/Brother
2= Parents
3= Friends
Where do you bury;
1=Cemetery
2=Bijja
4=On this land
5=other (specify)
5
4= Religious leader
5= Counseling Services
6= Other specify
Section 8: Income of Affected Household
What is the Main Source of income of the household
1= Salary
2= Husbands Salary
3= Business on land
4= Business located elsewhere
5= Rent collected from affected land
6= Rent collected from elsewhere
7= Agriculture activity on affected land
8= Agriculture activity on land elsewhere
9= Transfer income (Pension/handouts)
10= Other specify
What is the secondary source of income of the household
1= Salary
2= Husbands Salary
3= Business on land
4= Business located elsewhere
5= Rent collected from affected land
6= Rent collected from elsewhere
7= Agriculture activity on affected land
8= Agriculture activity on land elsewhere
9= Transfer income (Pension/handouts)
What other activities generate income for this household
0=No other
1= Fishing
2= Hunting
3= Poultry
4= Other
Compared to other residents in this Parish, in what category of standard of living would you put this HH?
(Enumerator use discretion to judge)
1= Rich
2= Average
3= Poor
4= Very Poor
What would you estimate to be the total income for this HH
Section 9: Health Hygiene and Sanitation
6
What are the most common diseases affecting your Family?
1= Malaria
2= Respiratory Track Infection (RTI)
3= Diarrhea
4= HIV/AIDS/STD
5= Measles=
6= Intestinal Worms
7= Hernia
8= Other specify
When was a member of the family last hospitalized?
1= In the last week
2= In the last month
3= In the last 6 months
4= Never
What type of Latrine do you use?
1= Bush
2= Hole in ground
3= Pit latrine
4= VIP
5= Flush Toilet
6=Communal Latrine
What is the source of your water?
1= Pond/unprotected well
2= Protected well
3= spring
4= Borehole
5=Tap Water (Stand pipe)
6=Piped Water in house
What is the distance to the water source
1= 100 metres
2= 100-500 metres
3= 500 – 1km
4=1 – 1.5km
5= over 5 km
Next of Kin (Names) Relationship Address / Contact
1=Brother
2= Sister
3= Husband
3=Wife
4= Daughter
5=Son
6=Father
7
7=Mother
8=Other (Specify)
I …………………….. Declare that the information above given by me is true and correct and I know this of my own knowledge. Signed by me
……………. …. On the …….day of ………. 2010
Representative LC! (In Witness): ………………………………………………… ……………………………………………………………………………………………
Name Signature Date
Representative Parish Land Committee ………………………………………….. ……………………………………………………………………………………………
Name Signature Date
8