root. (a) arabidopsis - plant cell ·  · 2014-12-24supplemental figure 1 – h2b-gfp expression...

11
Supplemental Data. Rosa et al. (2014). Plant Cell 10.1105/tpc.114.133793 1 Supplemental Figure 1 – H2B-GFP expression in Arabidopsis root. (A) Arabidopsis root expressing H2B-GFP protein fusion in the different developmental zones (M – division zone; EZ – elongation zone; DZ – differentiation zone), scale bar represents 100 μm. (B) Cell division showing complete incorporation of H2B-GFP in the chromatin. The nucleus on the left is undergoing division while the one on the right is in G2 stage, scale bar represents 5 μm.

Upload: trannga

Post on 25-Apr-2018

234 views

Category:

Documents


5 download

TRANSCRIPT

Supplemental Data. Rosa et al. (2014). Plant Cell 10.1105/tpc.114.133793

1

Supplemental Figure 1 – H2B-GFP expression in Arabidopsis root.

(A) Arabidopsis root expressing H2B-GFP protein fusion in the different

developmental zones (M – division zone; EZ – elongation zone; DZ –

differentiation zone), scale bar represents 100 µm. (B) Cell division

showing complete incorporation of H2B-GFP in the chromatin. The nucleus

on the left is undergoing division while the one on the right is in G2 stage,

scale bar represents 5 µm.

Supplemental Data. Rosa et al. (2014). Plant Cell 10.1105/tpc.114.133793

2

Supplemental Figure 2 - Arabidopsis root meristem diagram.

A schematic diagram showing tissues in Arabidopsis root meristem. (adapted from

(Heo et al., 2011))

Supplemental Data. Rosa et al. (2014). Plant Cell 10.1105/tpc.114.133793

3

Supplemental Figure 3 – De novo synthesis in H2B-GFP dynamics during the

cell cycle.

(A) De novo synthesis rates calculated as a percentage of initial intensities for H2B-

GFP protein after a period of 1h in the different developmental zones showing no

significant differences on protein abundance (p-value 0.2365, one-way ANOVA).

Values represent mean±s.e. (n=6-8). (B) FRAP curves for a non-chromatin-binding

protein (MS2CP-GFP), showing similar recoveries within the different

developmental regions. Values represent mean±s.e. from at least 10 cells. (C)

FRAP curves for H2B-GFP in the division zone on 4-day-old Col-0 plants (circles)

and on CHX (50ng/ml) treated plants (squares). (D) Estimated mobile fractions in

division for the described treatments. Values represent mean±s.e. from at least 5

cells. (Student’s t test, n.s. not-significant). (E) Representative images of whole

nucleus bleaching experiment in the presence of CHX, showing no significant

recovery after 1h. (F) Quantification from fluorescence recovery from experiment

depicted in C, Values represent mean±s.e. from 5 cells (Student’s t test, *P< 0.05).

Supplemental Data. Rosa

Supplemental Figure 4

(A) FRAP data for H2A

zone (empty circles) and differentiati

fractions for H2A

of 60min in division zone (empty circles) and differentiation zone (black circles).

Estimated mobile fractions

Supplemental Data. Rosa

Supplemental Figure 4

FRAP data for H2A

zone (empty circles) and differentiati

fractions for H2A-GFP

of 60min in division zone (empty circles) and differentiation zone (black circles).

stimated mobile fractions

Supplemental Data. Rosa et al. (2014). Plant Cell

Supplemental Figure 4 - FRAP analysis for H2A

FRAP data for H2A-GFP Left: recovery kinetics over a period of 60min in division

zone (empty circles) and differentiati

GFP. (C) FRAP data for H4

of 60min in division zone (empty circles) and differentiation zone (black circles).

stimated mobile fractions for H4

et al. (2014). Plant Cell

FRAP analysis for H2A

GFP Left: recovery kinetics over a period of 60min in division

zone (empty circles) and differentiation zone (black circles).

FRAP data for H4

of 60min in division zone (empty circles) and differentiation zone (black circles).

for H4-GFP. (Student’s

et al. (2014). Plant Cell 10.1105/tpc.114

4

FRAP analysis for H2A-GFP and H4

GFP Left: recovery kinetics over a period of 60min in division

on zone (black circles).

FRAP data for H4-GFP Left: recovery kinetics over a period

of 60min in division zone (empty circles) and differentiation zone (black circles).

. (Student’s t test, **

10.1105/tpc.114.133793

GFP and H4

GFP Left: recovery kinetics over a period of 60min in division

on zone (black circles).

GFP Left: recovery kinetics over a period

of 60min in division zone (empty circles) and differentiation zone (black circles).

test, **P< 0.01; ***

133793

GFP and H4-GFP.

GFP Left: recovery kinetics over a period of 60min in division

on zone (black circles). (B) Estimated

GFP Left: recovery kinetics over a period

of 60min in division zone (empty circles) and differentiation zone (black circles).

< 0.01; ***P< 0.001).

GFP Left: recovery kinetics over a period of 60min in division

stimated mobile

GFP Left: recovery kinetics over a period

of 60min in division zone (empty circles) and differentiation zone (black circles). (D

< 0.001).

GFP Left: recovery kinetics over a period of 60min in division

mobile

GFP Left: recovery kinetics over a period

(D)

Supplemental Data. Rosa et al. (2014). Plant Cell 10.1105/tpc.114.133793

5

Supplemental Figure 5- FRAP analysis for HTA11-GFP.

(A) FRAP curves for pHTA11:HTA11-GFP (H2A.Z). Recovery kinetics over a period

of 60min in division zone (empty circles), elongation zone (grey triangles) and

differentiation zone (black circles). (B) Estimated mobile fractions of FRAP curves

depicted in A. Values represent means ± s.e. from at least 10 cells.

Supplemental Data. Rosa

Supplement

different developmental zones.

(A) Recovery kinetics over a period of 60min in division zone (empty circles),

elongation zone (grey circles) and differe

mobile fractions of division zone (white), elongation zone (grey circles) and

differentiation

Supplemental Data. Rosa

Supplemental Figure 6

different developmental zones.

Recovery kinetics over a period of 60min in division zone (empty circles),

elongation zone (grey circles) and differe

mobile fractions of division zone (white), elongation zone (grey circles) and

differentiation zone (black).

Supplemental Data. Rosa et al. (2014). Plant Cell

al Figure 6- Two

different developmental zones.

Recovery kinetics over a period of 60min in division zone (empty circles),

elongation zone (grey circles) and differe

mobile fractions of division zone (white), elongation zone (grey circles) and

zone (black).

et al. (2014). Plant Cell

wo-photon FRAP curves for pSCR:

different developmental zones.

Recovery kinetics over a period of 60min in division zone (empty circles),

elongation zone (grey circles) and differe

mobile fractions of division zone (white), elongation zone (grey circles) and

et al. (2014). Plant Cell 10.1105/tpc.114

6

photon FRAP curves for pSCR:

Recovery kinetics over a period of 60min in division zone (empty circles),

elongation zone (grey circles) and differentiation zone (black circles).

mobile fractions of division zone (white), elongation zone (grey circles) and

10.1105/tpc.114.133793

photon FRAP curves for pSCR:

Recovery kinetics over a period of 60min in division zone (empty circles),

ntiation zone (black circles).

mobile fractions of division zone (white), elongation zone (grey circles) and

133793

photon FRAP curves for pSCR:H2B-PAGFP

Recovery kinetics over a period of 60min in division zone (empty circles),

ntiation zone (black circles). (B) Estimated

mobile fractions of division zone (white), elongation zone (grey circles) and

PAGFP at the

Recovery kinetics over a period of 60min in division zone (empty circles),

Estimated

mobile fractions of division zone (white), elongation zone (grey circles) and

Supplemental Data. Rosa et al. (2014). Plant Cell 10.1105/tpc.114.133793

7

Supplemental Figure 7 - FRAP analysis for H2B-GFP after mitosis.

(A) Representative images of H2B-GFP expressing cells from the division zone

tracked for 2h after mitosis (asterisk). Scale bars: 5 µm. (B) FRAP curves for H2B-

GFP cells 2h after cell division; Insert: Estimated mobile fraction. Value represents

mean ± s.e. from at least 5 cells. (C) Representative images of cells tracked for 2h,

6h and 10h after cell division. The tracked cells are outlined in orange. Scale bars: 5

µm. The total integrated intensity of H2B-GFP in these cells is plotted as a function

of time. (D) FRAP curves for H2B-GFP from cells at 1h, 2h, 6h and 10h after cell

division, showing no significant differences in the recovery dynamics.

Supplemental Data. Rosa

Supplemental Figure

Representative immunolabeling images of

(A) differentiation zone

and hag1

Supplemental Data. Rosa

Supplemental Figure

Representative immunolabeling images of

differentiation zone

hag1-6 mutant.

Supplemental Data. Rosa et al. (2014). Plant Cell

Supplemental Figure 8 – H2B acetylation in

Representative immunolabeling images of

differentiation zone (B) with an antibody against H2BK20ac, in wild

mutant.

et al. (2014). Plant Cell

H2B acetylation in

Representative immunolabeling images of

with an antibody against H2BK20ac, in wild

et al. (2014). Plant Cell 10.1105/tpc.114

8

H2B acetylation in hag1-

Representative immunolabeling images of Arabidopsis

with an antibody against H2BK20ac, in wild

10.1105/tpc.114.133793

-6 mutant.

Arabidopsis nuclei from the division zone

with an antibody against H2BK20ac, in wild

133793

nuclei from the division zone

with an antibody against H2BK20ac, in wild-type plants

nuclei from the division zone

type plants

Supplemental Data. Rosa et al. (2014). Plant Cell 10.1105/tpc.114.133793

9

Supplemental Figure 9 – RHD6-GFP and RSL4-GFP expression after TSA

treatment.

(A-D) 3-day-old wild-type roots expressing RHD6-GFP and RSL4-GFP. After

overnight incubation with TSA (100 ng/ml) expression of RHD6-GFP was extended

to the cell in the differentiation zone (B), while RSL4-GFP expression was reduced

to fewer cells in the elongation zone (D). Scale bars represent 100 µm.

RHD6:GFP RHD6:GFP + TSA RSL4:GFP RSL4:GFP + TSA

A B C D

Supplemental Data. Rosa et al. (2014). Plant Cell 10.1105/tpc.114.133793

10

Supplemental Figure 10 – HTA11-GFP expression in the root.

4 day-old wild-type root showing HTA11-GFP (H2A.Z-GFP) expression in the

meristem, elongation and progressively fading along the differentiation zone.

Supplemental Data. Rosa et al. (2014). Plant Cell 10.1105/tpc.114.133793

11

Supplemental Table 1 - Primers used in this study

Forward Reverse Used for

5’GGGGACAAGTTTGTACAAAAAAGCAGGCTTC

ATGGCGAAGGCAGATAAGAAACC3’

5’GGGGACCACTTTGTACAAGAAAGCTGGGTCA

GAAC TCGTAAAACTTCGGTAACCGC3’ Cloning H2B

5’GGGGACAAGTTTGTACAAAAAAGCAGGCTTC

ATGGCGGGTCGTGGTAAAAC3’

5’GGGGACCACTTTGTACAAGAAAGCTGGGTCA

TCGTCTTCAGCAGATGGC3’ Cloning H2A

5’GGGGACAAGTTTGTACAAAAAAGCAGGCTTC

ATGTCAGGAAGAGGAAAAGG3’

5’GGGGACCACTTTGTACAAGAAAGCTGGGTCA

CCACCAAATCCATATAGAG3’ Cloning H4

5’AAAAAGCAGGCTTCATGGTGAGCAAGGGCG

AG3’

5’AGAAAGCTGGGTCTTACTTGTACAGCTCG3’ Cloning PAGFP

5’GGGGACAACTTTGTATAGAAAAGTTGACAAT

TTTGAATCCATTCTCAAAGC3’

5’GGGGACTGCTTTTTTGTACAAACTTGTGGAG

ATTGAAGGGTTGTTGGTCG3’ Cloning pSCR

References

Heo, J.O., Chang, K.S., Kim, I.A., Lee, M.H., Lee, S.A., Song, S.K., Lee, M.M.,

and Lim, J. (2011). Funneling of gibberellin signaling by the GRAS transcription

regulator scarecrowlike 3 in the Arabidopsis root. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A 108:

2166-2171.