social capital 2011

Upload: cutiekitty

Post on 02-Apr-2018

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/27/2019 Social Capital 2011

    1/70

    Social Capital

  • 7/27/2019 Social Capital 2011

    2/70

    Class Exercise:The Open Source Movement

    Consider the GNU/Linux movement as an example ofcooperative, collective action

    How and why did it arise? That too in a high-tech,

    high-rewards environment.What are the motivations of its participants?

    What factors affect its success or failure?

    What are its implications for economic markets?

    Can such virtual communities be successful andcreate social capital?

    Are there limits to what such communities can do?

  • 7/27/2019 Social Capital 2011

    3/70

    Humans and Society

  • 7/27/2019 Social Capital 2011

    4/70

    Meditation 17

    Nuc lento sonitu dicunt, morieris.

    Now this bell tolling softly for another, says to me, Thou must die.

    ...No man is an island, entire of itself;

    every man is a piece of the continent, a part of the main.

    If a clod be washed away by the sea, Europe is the less,

    as well as if a promontory were,as well as if a manor of thy friend's or of thine own were.

    Any man's death diminishes me, because I am involved in mankind;

    and therefore never send to know for whom the bell tolls;

    it tolls for thee...

    John Donne,

    Devotions Upon Emergent Occasions 1624

  • 7/27/2019 Social Capital 2011

    5/70

    Quotes for ThoughtMargaret Thatcher: Theres no such thing as society

    Albert Hirschman: the ideological justification of thepursuit of individual interest and personal satisfactionundermines the essential elements of community andpublic life, such as cooperation, concern for thewelfare of others, and voluntary contribution of onesown personal resources to help create benefits for thecommunity.

    Hannah Arendt: Being fully human involves threetypes of human action: family life, work, and vivaactiva or public life, in which we collectively createcivil spheres.

  • 7/27/2019 Social Capital 2011

    6/70

    The Market vs The Polis:Deborah Stone

    Critique of The Rationality Project

    Standard economic analysis of people andsociety too limiting and misleading

    People are not just self-interest maximizingindividuals, aiming for efficiency all the time

    People do not interact with other people inmarket contexts alone

    People are part of communitiesTherefore, they are living and acting in a Polis

    (Aristotles democratic city-state)

  • 7/27/2019 Social Capital 2011

    7/70

    Community & Public InterestMembership of community is primary political issue

    Membership in a community defines social,economic and political rights; And responsibilities

    Communities have a collective will

    Public interest:

    Individual interests held in common

    Goals on which there is consensus

    Things good for community as community Defining public interest is often loaded with conflict

  • 7/27/2019 Social Capital 2011

    8/70

    Influence

    People in society do not think & act like atoms;they are subject to influence and persuasion

    They care about what others think and do

    Our thoughts and actions are affected byeducation, persuasion, socialization

    Influence collective behavior; bandwagoneffects, fads, panics

    Influence can morph into coercionPeople find it hard to dissent from mainstream

  • 7/27/2019 Social Capital 2011

    9/70

    Cooperation

    In polis, cooperation as key as competition

    Politics involves seeking allies and building

    coalitions to compete with opponentsAny time you go beyond two people

    Cooperation is essential to power

    Nazi orders executed by cooperative prisoners

    Compare Markets: cooperation is negative

    Collusion, oligarchy, price-fixing, insider trading

    In polis, cooperation is positive, & is the norm

  • 7/27/2019 Social Capital 2011

    10/70

    GroupsGroups and organizations are the

    building blocks of the polis People belong to groups, even if not explicitly

    Policy making also involves how groups areformed and re-formed to achieve public goals

    Groups are important because decisions in thepolis are collective

    Peoples actions are affected by roles,procedures, and audiences of group &organizational settings

  • 7/27/2019 Social Capital 2011

    11/70

    Information

    In a rational world, information is complete,perfect and available to everyone

    In the polis, information is

    InterpretiveTherefore politics all about controlling interpretation

    IncompleteFull context of Advani speech on Jinnah in Pakistan

    Strategically withheld or manipulatedTherefore, Freedom of Information Bills

    Media, not necessarily helpful, due to its biases

  • 7/27/2019 Social Capital 2011

    12/70

    Passion

    In market, economic resources governed bylaws of matter; resources are finite, scarce,consumed

    In polis, laws of passion operateBehave more like emotions than matter

    Passion feeds on itself

    Compassion, patriotism, solidarity grow with use

    Whole is greater than sum of its parts

    Things can mean many things at once

    Can turn negative as well?

  • 7/27/2019 Social Capital 2011

    13/70

    THE MYTH OF INDIVIDUALISM:Wayne E. Baker

    The cultural belief that everyone succeeds orfails on the basis of individual efforts andabilities.

    This fiction is that society consists of a set ofindependent individuals, each of whom actsto achieve goals that are independentlyarrived at, and that the functioning of the

    social system consists of the combination ofthese actions of independent individuals.

  • 7/27/2019 Social Capital 2011

    14/70

    Networks are the Reality

    Success is social: It depends on ourrelationships with others.

    All the ingredients of success that wecustomarily think of as individualnatural talent, intelligence, education,effort, and luckare intricately

    intertwined with networks.

  • 7/27/2019 Social Capital 2011

    15/70

    Getting a Job

    Getting a job is one of the best-known uses of networks. The vast majority of people dont find jobs through

    advertisements, headhunters, electronic bulletin boards(like monster.com), or other formal methods.

    These methods work, of course, and you should neverneglect them.

    But more people find jobs through personal contactsthan by any other means.

    (The reverse is also true: most employers find goodpeople by tapping networks of personal contacts. In

    fact, some companies institute organized programs toencourage workers to refer their contacts to thecompany

  • 7/27/2019 Social Capital 2011

    16/70

    Venture Capital

    Seventy-five percent of start-ups and new businessesfind and secure financing through the informalinvesting grapevinethe social networks of capitalseekers and investors.

    Capital seekers and providers find each other viafriends, colleagues, acquaintances, and well-connectedbusiness associates such as attorneys, insuranceagents, and accountants.

    This informal capital market is estimated to be so

    large that the amount of capital it provides is muchgreater than the financing supplied via the professionalventure capital market.

  • 7/27/2019 Social Capital 2011

    17/70

    High Finance

    Social networks play a major role in decisions topurchase the stock of giant companies, too, such asthose traded on the New York Stock Exchange.

    Polls of investors reveal that most institutional and

    individual investors decide to buy based on informationfrom a friend or business associate, or because theyknow someone who bought the stock.

    Contrary to popular wisdom, few investors makedecisions using such impersonal techniques as

    sophisticated technical analysis of a companysfundamentals.

  • 7/27/2019 Social Capital 2011

    18/70

    Connectedness Enhances Healthand Longevity!

    To gain the benefits of connection, it didnt matterwhat kind of connection a person had. For example,you could live alone, but have frequent contact withfriends or relatives, and be protected.

    Or you could belong to various voluntaryorganizations, but not participate in any religiousactivity, and still be protected.

    Or your connection could come from church andfamily, but not from any volunteer organization,

    and you would still be protected. The key to gaining the benefits of connection was

    to have several kinds of connection, but the kindscould vary from person to person

  • 7/27/2019 Social Capital 2011

    19/70

    Paradoxically

    Better networks improve wealth, health, andhappiness. Individuals andorganizations reapthe benefits of better networks. Thats goodnews.

    The even better news is that all of us canlearn how to build better networks.

    But theres a catch. If we create networkswith the sole intention ofgetting something,we wont succeed.

    We cantpursue the benefits of networks; thebenefits ensue from investments inmeaningful activities and relationships.

  • 7/27/2019 Social Capital 2011

    20/70

    Bourdieu: Social Class Matters

    Social networks, can produce or reproduceinequality.

    Upper layers of society have higher levels of

    social capital, especially throughassociational networks (formal social capital)

    Countries with high levels of inequalitymagnified these differences between classes,giving the upper classes further advantages

    (The CAT and IIM are open, competitiveways of joining upper class networks!)

  • 7/27/2019 Social Capital 2011

    21/70

    In terms the TV generation cangrasp

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1tPQ-xOLSSE

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1tPQ-xOLSSEhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1tPQ-xOLSSEhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1tPQ-xOLSSEhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1tPQ-xOLSSEhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1tPQ-xOLSSEhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1tPQ-xOLSSE
  • 7/27/2019 Social Capital 2011

    22/70

    SOCIAL CAPITAL AND NATIONS

  • 7/27/2019 Social Capital 2011

    23/70

    Institution Building in Iraq

    Robert Putnam: The US approach to reconstructing Iraq is

    fundamentally flawed.

    You can hand out largessebuild bridges, roads andschoolsbut you cannot build democracy easily byimposing it from above.

    For democracy to flourish, people need to feel thatthey have been involved in creating it.

    You need to create Social Capital.

    Without social capital, societies fall apart, even ifthe roads are smooth and the trains run on time.

  • 7/27/2019 Social Capital 2011

    24/70

    Social capital theory suggests that ordinary Iraqis need tofeel not only that they are the ones making decisions but thatthey are the ones who actually carry them out.

    Unfortunately, the US has centralized decision making.

    US should have waited for the Iraqi people to rebuildconnections among themselves and to then make decisionsabout what they want and whereshould have waited forsocial capital to arise organically, through legitimate

    democratic processes. Sadly for Iraq, though external agents have a tough time

    helping social capital grow, they can cause social capital todecline. Both Saddam Hussein's divisive rule and the chaosfollowing the U.S. invasion have increased the distrust

    ordinary Iraqis have for one another, lowering social capital.

  • 7/27/2019 Social Capital 2011

    25/70

    Putnam on Social Capital

    Social capital refers to:

    how responsible people in a community feel for each other.

    how closely people in the community are interconnected.

    People tend to obey the rules not because they areworried about cops but because they have obligations toother people.

    "In the U.S., tax compliance is powerfully predicted by thelevel of social capital in a community.

    Levels of social capital predict everything from the qualityof schools and local government, to the risk a country willgo down in corruption or blow up in civil war.

  • 7/27/2019 Social Capital 2011

    26/70

    Summarizing Social CapitalDeborah Stone

    Relations of influence and loyalty, norms of altruismand participation, and a past tradition of organizedcooperative efforts constitute a form of capital.

    Communities are best able to overcome the barriersto collective action when they have a large stockpileof these attitudes, norms and existing groups.

    A widespread sense of trust comes from shared

    experiences with other members of the communityand encourages people to participate in collectiveefforts.

  • 7/27/2019 Social Capital 2011

    27/70

    Norms of reciprocity, of give and take andresponsibility for the well-being of others,encourage civic engagement as well.

    And lastly, if a community has a dense network ofvoluntary associations, these serve as channels ofparticipation for the collective good, so that ahistory of civic engagement builds on itself.

    All of these factors create social capital, which,like physical assets or material wealth, can beused to harness individual energies for thecommon good.

  • 7/27/2019 Social Capital 2011

    28/70

    Social Capital Works Through Multiple Channels

    a. Information flows (e.g. learning about jobs, aboutelection candidates, exchanging ideas, etc.) depend onsocial capital

    b. Reciprocity norms (mutual aid) rely on social networks.

    Bonding networks that connect folks who are similarsustain particularized (in-group) reciprocity strongties and emotional support.

    Bridging networks that connect individuals who arediverse sustain generalized reciprocity weak ties.

    c. Collective action depends upon social networks (e.g.,role of the black church in the civic rights movement)

    d. Broader identities & solidarity are encouraged by socialnetworks that help translate an "I" into a We" mindset.

  • 7/27/2019 Social Capital 2011

    29/70

    Some Intellectual History

    From David Halperns SocialCapital

  • 7/27/2019 Social Capital 2011

    30/70

    Durkheim (1893)

    A nation can be maintained only if, between the stateand the individual, there is interposed a whole seriesof secondary groups near enough to the individuals toattract them strongly in their sphere of action and drag

    them, in this way, into the general torrent of civic life Societies with high levels of social cohesion and

    solidarity have less suicide than those with socialdislocation and loose social bonds.

    Society can support individuals through mutual moral

    support, which instead of throwing the individual onhis own resources, leads him to share in the collectiveenergy and supports his own when exhausted

  • 7/27/2019 Social Capital 2011

    31/70

    Bourdieu

    Social capital is the sum of the resources,actual or virtual, that accrue to an individualor a group by virtue of possessing a durable

    network of more or less institutionalisedrelationships of mutual acquaintance andrecognition. Acknowledging that capital cantake a variety of forms is indispensable to

    explain the structure and dynamics ofdifferentiated societies

    Capital: economic, cultural, and social

  • 7/27/2019 Social Capital 2011

    32/70

    Coleman

    Like other forms of capital, socialcapital is productive, making possiblethe achievement of certain ends that

    in its absence would not be possible

  • 7/27/2019 Social Capital 2011

    33/70

    Social Capital and Democracy

    Democracyrequires organized competitionfor power.

    Civility (mutual respect) required for

    democracy is learnt in associationalnetworks. (Walzer)

    Association leads to trust, which in turnaids cooperation.

    A strong active civil society is also neededto make democracy work (need to allow forcivilized dissent and plurality of views).

  • 7/27/2019 Social Capital 2011

    34/70

    Insights

    Stocks of social capital, such as trust,

    norms, and networks, tend to be self-reinforcing and cumulative. Successful

    collaboration in one endeavour buildsconnections and trust social assetsthat facilitate future collaboration inother, unrelated tasks. As withconventional capital, those who havesocial capital tend to accumulate more.

  • 7/27/2019 Social Capital 2011

    35/70

    Social capital can lead to exclusive in-groups Racist and casteist exclusion

    Old boys clubs and glass ceilings

    Family values & social norms can hinder growth Womens participation in society and work may be

    blocked by tradition, norms, religion.

    Free speech and creativity may be curbed by thepressure to conform.

    Social capital can be built using hatred, where acommunity is united by demonizing the other.Can lead to horrible effects. Holocaust & Hitler; the banality of evil.

    Caveat: -ve Aspects of Social Capital

  • 7/27/2019 Social Capital 2011

    36/70

    How Putnam Rediscovered Social Capital

    "You tell me how many choral societies thereare in an Italian region, and I will tell youplus or minus three days how long it will take

    you to get your health bills reimbursed by itsregional government." (Robert Putnam,Interview, 1995)

    http://muse.jhu.edu/demo/journal_of_democracy/v006/putnam.interview.htmlhttp://muse.jhu.edu/demo/journal_of_democracy/v006/putnam.interview.html
  • 7/27/2019 Social Capital 2011

    37/70

    What Makes Some Regions MoreEconomically Vibrant than Others?

    What makes regional governments in NorthernItaly more effective than others in the South?

    Answer: Not budgets or policy frameworks

    Key factor: Vibrancy of associational life andthe level of trust between strangers

    High social capital: participation in horizontalassociations (e.g., choral society); high trust

    Low social capital: vertical or hierarchicalsocial organization dominant; power &patronage; high distrust; reliance on family

  • 7/27/2019 Social Capital 2011

    38/70

    So, for Putnam, Social Capital

    Has Three Components

    Moral obligations and norms (cooperation)

    Social values (especially generalized trust)

    Social networks (esp. voluntary associations) If a region has a well-functioning economic

    system and a high level of politicalintegration, these are the result of the

    regions successful accumulation of socialcapital

  • 7/27/2019 Social Capital 2011

    39/70

    Fukuyama: Implications for CountriesEconomic Evolution

    Most economic activity is carried out by organizationsthat require a high degree of social cooperation.

    The ability to form organizations depends oninstitutions like property rights, contracts, and asystem of commercial law.

    It also requires a high degree of trust in strangers. US, Germany and Japan have high associational

    activity, hence high social cooperation and trust Thus they are characterized by corporate forms of

    businessideal for modern business success

    Taiwan, Italy and Francecountries with low socialtrusthave more family firms Countries with very low levels of social trust and

    ineffective institutions, like Russia, do not nurturefree market capitalism

  • 7/27/2019 Social Capital 2011

    40/70

    How to Nurture Social Capital?

    Start with children!

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5exvfbnFMUg

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5exvfbnFMUghttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5exvfbnFMUghttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5exvfbnFMUghttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5exvfbnFMUg
  • 7/27/2019 Social Capital 2011

    41/70

    Hows America Doing In Terms OfSocial Capital?

  • 7/27/2019 Social Capital 2011

    42/70

    De Tocquevilles Travels in early USA

    Alexis De Tocqueville: French visitor to USA in 1876

    Americans are forever forming associations of all sorts

    Involvement in public affairs brings the individual out ofsocial isolation, redirecting his personal interest into

    causes for the general good. It leads the individual to become involved in creating

    social capital.

    Social capital, a participatory culture, and a belief inequality makes American democracy work

    Opposite of civic participation is the pursuit of privatefinancial interests.

    Argues that immersing oneself in commercial marketsdiminishes the individuals role as a "citizen".

  • 7/27/2019 Social Capital 2011

    43/70

    Putnams Findings: Americans vote less and participate in civic affairs less

    Volunteering: womens groups, Scouts, Red Cross, down

    Family also on the decline

    Countertrends

    Church membership up

    Membership in Tertiary organizations up (cheque bookmembership; no interaction with other members)

    Professionalization of the third sector NGOs

    Support group membership up Other findings: Trust

    Trust in people down

    Trust in government down

  • 7/27/2019 Social Capital 2011

    44/70

    Causes

    Movement of women into the workforce Less volunteering

    Mobility and migration

    People less rooted Demographic transformations and effect of

    changes in economic organization Supermarkets, Internet shopping dont enable

    meaningful relationships

    Technological transformation of leisure People spending time in front of the TV rather

    than hanging out with neighbours

  • 7/27/2019 Social Capital 2011

    45/70

    Implications and Prescriptions

    Putnam: warns that Americas stock of social capitalthe very fabric of our connections with each other, hasplummeted, impoverishing our lives and communities.This is worrisome.

    He quotes many studies (e.g., North vs South Italy)that show a correlation between high levels of civicculture, comfortable lifestyles and positive economicoutcomes.

    He claims that the interactions which create socialcapital are most likely to occur in egalitariancommunities where people voluntarily contribute timeand effort and receive positive reinforcement.

    If peoples interactions in society are declining, & theyare bowling alone, bad for American democracy

  • 7/27/2019 Social Capital 2011

    46/70

    Post 9/11

    Social Capital grew in the USA This is a pattern among countries at warwars

    strengthen feeling of solidarity and communitybonding

    Peoples interest in public affairs grew Among young from 8 to 35 percent

    Increase in confidence in government From 44 to 51 percent in re federal govt Trust increased 19 percent in local govt

    Trust increased 14 percent in police But!

    Trust in Arabs & immigrants fell by 11 percent

  • 7/27/2019 Social Capital 2011

    47/70

    The Internet and Social Capital

  • 7/27/2019 Social Capital 2011

    48/70

  • 7/27/2019 Social Capital 2011

    49/70

    The Internet & Social Capital

    The Internet transforms social capital

    Facilitates spatially dispersed communitiesof shared interest

    The Internet diminishes social capital Draws people away from family, friends

    Reduces involvement in local community

    The Internet supplements social capital Another means of communication

    Increases existing social contact

  • 7/27/2019 Social Capital 2011

    50/70

  • 7/27/2019 Social Capital 2011

    51/70

    And Internet Hinders Social Capital?

    The Internet may be diverting people fromtrue community because online interactionsare inherently inferior to face-to-face andeven phone interactions

    Internet accelerating move from all-encompassing, socially controllingcommunities to individualized, fragmentedpersonal communities

    When Internet engages people in asocial

    activities, more than TV, its immersivenesscan turn people away from community,organizational and political involvement, anddomestic life

  • 7/27/2019 Social Capital 2011

    52/70

    Facebook and Maintained Capital

    Social networking sites likeFacebook are enhancingthe ability of people tostay in touch with

    communities to which theypreviously belonged

    This helps maintain stocksof social capital built overtime, but affected byphysical mobility andmigration

  • 7/27/2019 Social Capital 2011

    53/70

  • 7/27/2019 Social Capital 2011

    54/70

    Social Capitals Implications for India

    A h h V h C l

  • 7/27/2019 Social Capital 2011

    55/70

    Ashutosh Varshney on CommunalViolence and Social Capital

    Studies pairs of similar Indian cities (minority %)

    One set has communal riots; other does not. Why?

    Ahmedabad vs Surat; Hyderabad vs Lucknow

    Key are Intercommunal Interactions & Networks

    Intercommunal Interaction:

    Quotidian or everyday interaction, e.g., shops

    Associational interaction, e.g., civic networks

    Associational Interaction Key to Defusing Tension Integrated civic groups quash rumors & prevent riots

    Can construct politically: Gandhi, Congress big tent

  • 7/27/2019 Social Capital 2011

    56/70

    Social Capital at the Grassroots Railway Porters in Dadar

    Drawn mainly from certain villages in Maharashtra

    Entry into profession mainly on kinship links

    Create rules and norms of cooperation

    Create cooperative society for social & financialsupport, especially for emergencies

    Draw on village as insurance & medical support

    Social capital larger in villages?

    Familial networks act as support system Can be conservative; against change or risk taking

  • 7/27/2019 Social Capital 2011

    57/70

    Social Capital in the Slums

    Slum Clearance Policy Involves Relocation When slum populations are displaced, social

    networks are ruptured.

    Social networks are linked to group identity, safety,solidarity, livelihood and survival and formed on thebasis of caste, religion, neighbourhood and livelihood.

    We always lived with our people, people that belonged toour caste, religion, region, it was almost like living with a

    joint family. Now it has changed after coming here. We areso many of us living together that belong to differentcastes, religion, region and even slums. (Focus groupparticipant at a rehabilitation site).

  • 7/27/2019 Social Capital 2011

    58/70

    So Social Capital, Good or Bad?

    Positive impacts of social networks in slums:

    Social safety nets of urban poor. Gives sense ofbelonging in a hostile city where many are migrants.

    Social networks amongst women influences work,activities, community and political participation.

    Helps dwellers better negotiate with local authorities.

    Negative impacts:

    Social networks remain influenced by caste, religion,language and space (proximity dictates membership).

    Networks are often small, fragmented and lead toexclusion: hard to enter as an outsider.

  • 7/27/2019 Social Capital 2011

    59/70

    Social Capital and Merit

    Indias urban middle classes have extensivesocial networks

    These confer an economic advantage overothers

    Their less able children are still able to findgood jobs whereas less well connectedworking class children must rely on theirabilities to help them stand out and succeed

    Background and Social Class matter notjust Merit

    S i l C it l I li ti f

  • 7/27/2019 Social Capital 2011

    60/70

    Social Capital Implications forBusiness

  • 7/27/2019 Social Capital 2011

    61/70

    Coase, the Firm, & Social Capital

    Economic advantages in bringing together groupof people with complementary skills and divisionof labourCoase: The Theory of the Firm

    Minimizes transaction costs, contracts,

    bargaining Firm as an example of bonding social capital.

    Individuals develop shared norms (corporateculture, mission).

    Sanctions ensure conformance Links b/w firms & trading partners also important

  • 7/27/2019 Social Capital 2011

    62/70

    Building Silicon Valley

    Bonding inside firms and bridging across firmsfacilitates economic growth, e.g., Silicon Valley

    May need an existing network of expertise, e.g., auniversity, as a base (Cambridge, UK Science Park)

    Tacit knowledge exchange, Co-opetition Route 128, near Boston, failed to let go of

    traditional norms of hierarchy, secrecy, self-sufficiency, territoriality, compared to Silicon Valley

    Policy Implication: Invest not just in science &technology, invest also in social capital formation inthese sectors

  • 7/27/2019 Social Capital 2011

    63/70

    Social Capital in Business

    In the business context, social capitalrefers to the relationships that makebusinesses work effectively

    Social capital may be under threatbecause of:

    Volatility and virtuality

    Inadequacy of managers in understandingand promoting social capital

  • 7/27/2019 Social Capital 2011

    64/70

    Building Social Capital

    Making Connections

    A real commitment to retention

    Promoting from within

    Giving people time and space to bond inperson

    Facilitate personal conversations

    Fostering durable networks

  • 7/27/2019 Social Capital 2011

    65/70

    Building Social Capital

    Enabling Trust Trust thrives where managers give

    employees no reason to distrust

    Transparency Confidence in rule of law

    Show trust trust begets trust Trust employees judgement

    Send clear signals that employees are valued Reward trust

  • 7/27/2019 Social Capital 2011

    66/70

    Building Social Capital

    Fostering Cooperation

    Give people a common sense of purpose

    Reward cooperation with incentives

    Establish rules for cooperation

    Hire for cooperation

  • 7/27/2019 Social Capital 2011

    67/70

    1. Lead with credibility & caring

    2. Invest in frontline leadership

    3. Hire & train for relational competence

    4. Use conflicts to build relationships5. Bridge the work/family divide

    6. Create boundary spanners

    7. Measure performance broadly

    8. Keep jobs flexible at the boundaries

    9. Make unions your partners10. Build relationships with suppliers

    Relat ional Coo rdinat ion

    Shared goals, knowledge,

    mutual respect

    Frequent, timely, problem-solving

    communication

    Qual i ty Perform ance Eff ic iency Perform ance

    Southwest

    Airlines

    Source: Gittell, 2004

    Celebrating a Culture of Caring

  • 7/27/2019 Social Capital 2011

    68/70

    Celebrating a Culture of Caringat Southwest Airlines

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VOkwtB5SLVY

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VOkwtB5SLVYhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VOkwtB5SLVYhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VOkwtB5SLVYhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VOkwtB5SLVY
  • 7/27/2019 Social Capital 2011

    69/70

    END

  • 7/27/2019 Social Capital 2011

    70/70