youth knowledge and attitudes about mental illness otto wahl & dayna zatina university of...
TRANSCRIPT
Youth knowledge and Youth knowledge and attitudes about mental attitudes about mental
illnessillness
Otto Wahl & Dayna ZatinaOtto Wahl & Dayna ZatinaUniversity of HartfordUniversity of Hartford
Amy Lax, Janet Susin, & Lorraine KaplanAmy Lax, Janet Susin, & Lorraine KaplanNAMI Queens/NassauNAMI Queens/Nassau
Rationale for the current Rationale for the current studystudy• Mental illnesses are common among youth.
• Youth knowledge and attitudes will affect treatment seeking.
• Youth knowledge and attitudes will affect peers who experience psychiatric disorders.
• Youth knowledge attitudes set the foundation for adult attitudes.
• Compared to adult attitudes, relatively little is known about youth views of mental illnesses.
Highlights of previous Highlights of previous researchresearch• Multiple measures—survey, story-telling, stick figure
drawings of social distance
• Limited psychometric evaluation of measures.
• Wide range of ages and developmental levels.
• Main results:
– Knowledge about mental illnesses limited, especially at younger ages.
– Specific, consistent attitudes not found
– But generally, even younger school age children see mental illnesses in a more negative light than they see physical illnesses.
Current ResearchCurrent Research• Participants = 88 middle school students
(7th grade)– From two U.S. schools (Connecticut and South
Carolina)– 1 public, 1 private– 50% male and 50% female– 13% Minorities
• This was the first part of a larger study to assess the impact of a middle school mental health education curriculum on knowledge and attitudes. Goals of part 1 were:– To establish a measure appropriate for middle
school students– To establish a baseline of knowledge and
attitudes toward mental illnesses.
Instrument DevelopmentInstrument Development• Knowledge and attitudes questionnaire
– Selected knowledge items based on previous research, current adult instruments, and facts stressed in the teaching curriculum.
– Similar selection for attitude items.
• Social distance measure modified for middle school experiences
• Language reviewed by advisory board of school teachers and educators and modified to fit middle school students
• Reading level of items analyzed via Microsoft program, leading to further modification of items. Lower level items were placed earlier in the questionnaires.
Study MeasuresStudy Measures• Knowledge and attitude questionnaire
– 35 items– 18 Knowledge and 17 attitude questions– Likert choices from Strongly Agree to Strongly
Disagree (5-point scale)– Questionnaire included reverse items (where
disagreement rather than agreement indicated greater knowledge and more positive attitudes)
– Reverse items were reverse scored so that higher scores indicate greater knowledge and more positive attitudes
• Social Distance measure (8 items)– Willingness to interact in specific situations– 5-point Likert choices—Definitely Unwilling to
Definitely Willing– Higher scores indicate greater acceptance
Psychometric properties of Psychometric properties of measuresmeasures
• Internal consistency (Kappa)– Knowledge: .45– Attitudes: .82– Social Distance: .90
• Test-retest reliability– Knowledge: .67– Attitudes: .82– Social Distance: .90
Knowledge: The Good Knowledge: The Good NewsNews
• Overall knowledge was reasonably good
• Mean overall knowledge score was 64.82 (max = 90).
• The majority of students knew that
– mental illness is not contagious (89%)
– “psycho” and “maniac” are unacceptable terms to describe people with mental illnesses (63%)
– mental illnesses have biological causes (60%)
– people with mental illnesses are not violent and dangerous (58%)
Knowledge: Not-so-good Knowledge: Not-so-good NewsNews
There were numerous gaps in specific knowledge.
• Only 58% agreed that people with mental illnesses are not violent and dangerous.
• Only a minority of students knew that
– people with bipolar disorder are sometimes overconfident and overly energetic (10%)
– severe forms of mental illness can be treated successfully (11%)
– schizophrenia does not involve multiple personalities (18%)
– mental illness is often mistaken for drug abuse (23%)
– people with mental illnesses have included famous people such as astronauts, presidents, and baseball players (33%)
– mental illness and mental retardation are not the same things (41%)
Attitudes and Social Attitudes and Social Distance:Distance:
The Good NewsThe Good News• Expressed attitudes were generally positive.
– Overall attitude score: 63.35 (max = 85)
– Overall social distance score: 20.56 (max = 40)
• The majority of students
– Agreed that a person with a mental illness can be a good friend (91%)
– Agreed that people with mental illnesses deserve respect (86%)
– Indicated they would be willing to have someone with a mental illness
• In a class with them (72%)
• As a neighbor (67%)
Attitudes and Social Attitudes and Social Distance:Distance:
No-so-good NewsNo-so-good News• The downside of the good news:
– More than 1 in 4 are not willing to have someone with a mental illness in a class with them.
– One third are not willing to have someone with a mental illness as a neighbor.
• A substantial percentage of students agreed that
– it would be embarrassing to have a mental illness (39%)
– children with mental illnesses should not be in regular classrooms (28%).
– they have little in common with someone with a mental illness (28%)
• Only a minority of students indicated they would be willing to
– invite someone with a mental illness to their home (44%)
– work on a class project with someone with a mental illness (38%)
– go on a date with someone with a mental illness (20%)
ConclusionsConclusions• It is possible to develop measures of youth
knowledge and attitudes that are reliable, internally consistent, and informative.
• Results from these measures suggest:
– There is substantial need for improvement in youth knowledge and attitudes related to mental illnesses.
– Educational efforts with youth should convey information about specific disorders and their manifestations and differences.
– Work with youth should encourage greater acceptance and tolerance of peers with psychiatric disorders.