consolidated audit report on the official development ......awol absent without leave bac bids and...
TRANSCRIPT
2017
Consolidated Audit Report
on
Official Development Assistance
Programs and Projects
TABLE OF CONTENTS Page
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Legal Basis 1
1.2 Scope and Sources 2
1.3 Methodology 4
2.0 HIGHLIGHTS OF THE REPORT
2.1 Gross Commitments 6 2.2 Availments 7 2.3 Undrawn Commitments 7 2.4 Repayments 8 2.5 Debt Service Expenditures for the year 8 2.6 Commitment Fees for the year 9 2.7 Audit Observations and Recommendations 9
3.0 STATUS OF ODA-FUNDED PROJECTS
3.1 Cumulative Gross Loan Commitments 10
3.2 Availments 14
3.3 Undrawn Commitments 19
3.4 Repayments 21
3.5 Debt Service Expenditures 25
3.6 Outstanding Balances 28
4.0 AUDIT OBSERVATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
4.1 Consolidated Audit Observations and Recommendations 33
A. Project Sustainability 33
B. Project Implementation and Management 35
C. Financial Management 49
D. Compliance with Existing Laws, Rules and Regulations and Provisions of the MOA
60
E. Reliability of Financial Statements 70
4.2 General Audit Recommendations 76
4.3 Status of Implementation of Prior Years’ Audit Recommendations 77
5.0 CHARTS
I Loan Structure by Sector and Creditor Type Indicating the Number of Loans Contracted and CNLC
3
II Loan Status 6
III CGLC, CL and CNLC 6
IV Schedule of Availments and Undrawn Balances by Type of Creditor 7
V Loan Availments, Repayments and Balances by Type of Creditor 8
VI Comparative Repayments in relation to Availments 22
VII Debt Service Expenditures 25
VIII Outstanding Balance by Creditor Type 28
IX Number of Loans and Outstanding Balances by Sector 29
6.0 TABLES
I Status and Breakdown of Loans 3
II Current and Cumulative Loan Availments by Project and Government Sector
7
III Debt Service Expenditures by Creditor Type 9
IV Debt Service Expenditures by Sector 9
V Commitment Fees Paid by Type of Creditors and Loans 9
VI List of New ODA Loans 10
VII Cancelled Commitments for 2017 10
VIII Schedule of Cumulative Net Loan Commitments by Creditor 11
IX Schedule of Cumulative Net Loan Commitments by Sector 13
X Schedule of Cumulative Net Loan Commitments by Implementing Agency
13
XI Cumulative and Current Year Availments by Creditor 14
XII Cumulative and Current Year Availments by Project Sector 16 XIII Cumulative and Current Year Availments by IA 16
XIV Programs and Projects for Implemention by Various IAs out of CY 2017 Availments
17
XV Schedule of Loans with Undrawn Balances by Creditor 19
XVI Schedule of Undrawn Balances by Project Sector 20
XVII Schedule of IAs with Undrawn Balances 21
XVIII Cumulative and Current Year Repayments by Creditor 22
XIX Cumulative and Current Year Repayments by Project Sector 23
XX Cumulative and Current Year Repayments by IA 24
XXI Debt Service Expenditures by Creditor 25
XXII Debt Service Expenditures by Implementing Agencies 26
XXIII Debt Service Expenditures by Project Sector 27
XXIV Changes on Loan Outstanding Balance 28
XXV Outstanding Balances by Specific Creditor 28
XXVI Five Loans under each Project Sector with big Outstanding Balances 30
XXVII Outstanding Balances by Government Sector 31
XXVIII Outstanding Balances by IA 32
XXIX Operational Status of Completed Projects 33
XXX Status of Implementation of PY’s Audit Recommendations 77
4 Ps Pantawid Pamilyang Pilipino Program
AARNR Agriculture, Agrarian Reform and Natural Resources
ABC Approved Budget for the Contract
ACSP Agricultural Credit Support Project
ACT Area Coordinating Teams
ADB Asian Development Bank
AFC Automated Fare Collection
AO Accountable Officer
APP Annual Procurement Plan
ARBP PH II Arterial Road Bypass Project, Phase II
ARCP II Agrarian Reform Communities Project II
ARE Acknowledgement Receipt for Equipment
ARIIP Agno River Integrated Irrigation Project
AWOL Absent without leave
BAC Bids and Awards Committee
BFAR Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources
BIR Bureau of Internal Revenue
BOC Bureau of Customs
BRS Bank Reconciliation Statement
BS Bank Statements
BSPMC Barangay Sub-project Management Committee
BTr Bureau of the Treasury
CA Certificate of Acceptance
CAAR Consolidated Annual Audit Report
CADF Carbon Asset Development Program
CAMDP Clark Area Municipal Development Project
CAR Cordillera Administrative Region
CAs Cash Advances
CBFMMP Community-Based Forest and Mangrove Management Project
CBRT Cebu Bus Rapid Transit
CCC Commodity Credit Corporation
CCP Coastal Commodity Package
CCT/MCCT Conditional Cash Transfer/Modified Conditional Cash Transfer
CEMTSMMP Capacity Enhancement of Mass Transit Systems in Metro Manila Project
CFI Community Financial Institution
CHARMP Cordillera Highland Agricultural Resource Management Program
CHI-I China National Construction and Agriculture Machinery I
CIB-LCCA Cash in Bank – Local Currency, Current Account
CIP Construction In Progress
CIS Communal Irrigation Systems
CLC Cumulative Loan Cancellation
CNLC Cumulative Net Loan Commitment
CNS/ATM Communication, Navigation, Surveillance/Air Traffic Management
CO Central Office
COA Commission on Audit
CSC Civil Service Commission
CTEs Contract Time Extensions
LIST OF ACRONYMS
LIST OF ACRONYMS
CY Calendar Year
DA Department of Agriculture
DAR Department of Agrarian Reform
DARPO Department of Agrarian Reform Provincial Office
DBM Department of Budget and Management
DBP Development Bank of the Philippines
DENR Department of Environment and Natural Resources
DepEd Department of Education
DFIMDP Diversified Farm Income and Market Development Project
DILG Department of Interior and Local Government
DMAD Debt Monitoring and Analysis Division
DO Department Order
DOE Department of Energy
DOF Department of Finance
DOH Department of Health
DOTr Department of Transportation
DPWH Department of Public Works and Highways
DSWD Department of Social Welfare and Development
DTI Department of Trade and Industry
DV Disbursement Voucher
ECGD Export Credit Guarantee Department - Deutsche Bank
EDC Export Development Corporation
EHRDP Expanded Human Resources Development Program
EIB European Investment Bank
ENP Emergency Network Project
EO Executive Order
EPC Estimated Project Cost
E-Trike Energy Efficient Electric Vehicles Project
EU-HSPSP II EU-Health Sector Policy Support Programme
FAP Foreign-assisted Projects
FAR Financial Accountability Report
FFIs Foreign Funding Institutions
FLAD Foreign Loan Accounting Division
FMP Forest Management Project
FMR Farm-to-Market Road
FO Field Office
FXRC Foreign Exchange Risk Cover
FY Fiscal Year
GAA General Appropriations Act
GAM Government Accounting Manual
GCF General Control Fund
GID Governance and Institutions Development
GMDSSP Global Maritime Distress Safety System Project
GOCCs Government Owned and Controlled Corporations
GPPB Government Procurement Policy Board
GSIS Government Service Insurance System
HOPE Head of the Procuring Entity
LIST OF ACRONYMS
IA Implementing Agency
IARCDSP Italian Assistance to the Agrarian Reform Community Development Support
Program
IBRD International Bank for Reconstruction and Development
I-BUILD Intensified Building up of Infrastructure and Logistics for Development
IIRUP Inventory and Inspection Report of Unserviceable Property
IMA Implementation Management Agreement
IMOs Irrigation Management Offices
Infra Infrastructure
InfRES Infrastructure for Rural Productivity Enhancement Sector Project
INREMP Integrated Natural Resources and Environmental Management Project
I-REAP
Investments in Rural Enterprises and Agriculture and Fisheries Productivity
IRR Implementing Rules and Regulations
ITT Industry, Trade and Tourism
JEV Journal Entry Voucher
JICA Japan International Cooperation Agency
JRMPP Jalaur River Multi Purpose Project Stage
JSDF Japan Social Development Fund
KALAHI-
CIDSS
Kapit-Bisig Laban sa Kahirapan-Comprehensive and Integrated Delivery of
Social Services
KC-AF KALAHI CIDSS - Additional Financing
KC-NCDDP KALAHI CIDSS - National Community-Driven Development Project
LAF Livelihood Assistance Fund
LBP Landbank of the Philippines
LCCA Local Currency Current Account
LCE Local Chief Executive
LD Liquidated Damages
LGUs Local Government Units
LIGs Livelihood Interest Groups
LRT Light Rail Transit
LRTA Light Rail Transit Authority
LRV Light Rail Vehicles
MASELCO Masbate Electric Cooperative
MBUSSP Mindanao Basic Urban Services Sector Project
MCW Magna Carta on Women
MDFO Miunicipal Development Fund Office
MDP Monthly Disbursement Program
MDS Modified Disbursement System
MESP Missionary Electrification Subsidy Program
MIMAROPA Mindoro, Marinduque, Romblon, Palawan
MINSAAD Mindanao Sustainable Agrarian and Agriculture Development
MLGU Municipal Local Government Unit
MM Municipal Monitor
MOA Memorandum of Agreement
MOMARO Mindoro Oriental Marinduque Romblon
MOOE Maintenance and Other Operating Expenses
LIST OF ACRONYMS
MRD Monthly Report of Disbursement
MSCIP Maritime Safety Capability Improvement Project
MSIP III Maritime Safety Improvement Project, Phase 3
MSSP Manila Second Sewerage Project
MWSS Manila Water and Sewerage System
NAC National Advisory Committee
NBAC-SEPP New Bohol Airport Construction and Sustainable Environmet Protection Project
NCA Notice of Cash Allocation
NCAA Non-Cash Availment Authority
ND Notice of Disallowance
NEDA National Economic Development Authority
NFA National Food Authority
NG National Government
NGAs National Government Agencies
NGAS New Government Accounting System
NGDAD National Government Debt Accounting Division
NGOs/POs Non-Governmental Organizations/Peoples' Organization
NIA National Irrigation Administration
NICIS Non-intrusive Container Inspection System
NIS National Irrigation Systems
NISRIP National Irrigation Sector Rehabilitation and Improvement Project
NOL No Objection Letter
NPCO National Project Coordination Office
NPMO National Project Management Office
NPS-ENRMP National Program Support for Environment and Natural Resources
Management Project
NRIMP National Roads Improvement and Management Project
NS Notice of Suspension
NYI Not Yet Implemented
ODA Official Development Assistance
ORs Official Receipts
OTC Over the Counter
PAD Project Appraisal Document
PAR Property Acknowledgment Receipt
PAS Philippine Accounting Standards
PB Progress Billings
PCCP Portland Cement Concrete Pavement
PD Presidential Decree
PEEP Philippine Energy Efficiency Project
PENRO Provincial Environment and Natural Resources Office
PHP Philippine Peso
PIA PHIVIDEC Industrial Authority
PIDP Participatory Irrigation Development Project
PLGU Provincial Local Government Unit
PMO Project Management Office
PMU Project Monitoring Unit
LIST OF ACRONYMS
PO Purchase Order
POPSTIRP Pepeng Short-Term Infrastructure Rehabilitation Projects
PPADP Puerto Princesa Airport Development Project
PPCGCDP Philippine Ports and Coast Giard Capability Development Project
PPE Property, Plant and Equipment
PPELC PPE Ledger Card
PPIADP Puerto Princesa Airport Development Project
PPMIU Provincial Project Management Implementing Unit
PPRPC Pantawid Pamily Regional Program Coordinator
PPSAS Philippine Public Sector Accounting Standards
PR Purchase Request
PRDP Philippine Rural Development Project
PREMRP Pasig River Environment Management and Rehabilitation Project
PRES Philippine Rural Electrification Service
PRRC Pasig River Reconstruction Commission
PS-DBM Procurement Service – Department of Budget and Management
PSO Project Support Office
PTA Philippine Tourism Authority
PTR Property Transfer Form
PWDs Persons with Disabilities
PWS Potable Water System
PWU Provincial Women's Union
QPRO Quarterly Physical Report of Operation
QTP Qualified Third Party
RA Republic Act
RCI Report of Checks Issued
RD Regional Director
RFO Regional Field Office
RFQ Request For Quotation
RIIDP Road Improvement and Institutional Development Project
ROW Right-of-Way
RPCI Report on the Physical Count of Inventory
RPCO Regional Project Coordination Office
RPCPPE Report on the Physical Count of Property, Plant and Equipment
RPMO Regional Project Management Office
RSMI Report of Supplies and Materials Issued
RUPP Road Upgrading & Preservation Project
RZOA Raiffeissen Zentralbank Osterreich Aktiengeselschaft
SARO Special Allotment Release Order
SBC Small Business Corporation
SBMA Subic Bay Metropolitan Authority
SC Supreme Court
SCBAA Statement of Comparison of Budget and Actual Amounts
SCHARMP Second Cordillera Highland Agricultural Resource Management Project
SFP Statement of Financial Performance
SHS Solar Home Systems
SL Subsidiary Ledger
LIST OF ACRONYMS
SP Sub-projects
SPMB Subproject Monitoring Board
SPs Sub-Projects
SPSP Social Protection Support Project
SRCD Social Reform and Community Development
SREs Statement of Receipts and Expenditures
SRPMO Sub-Regional Project Management Office
SRRDP Social Reform Related Feeder Ports Development Projects
SSAF Sources and Application of Funds
SSC Staff Selection Committee
SUSIMO Sub-project Site Management Office
SWD Social Welfare and Development
SWDRP Social Welfare and Development Reform Project
TADP Third Airports Development Project
TCT Transfer Certificate of Title
TE Time Extension
TESDA Technical Education and Skills Development Authority
TIEZA Tourism Infrastructure and Enterprise Zone Authority
TS Technical Specifications
TSC Technical Support Consultant
TSPs Technical Service Providers
TWG Technical Working Group
UBCPRD Urgent Bridges Construction Project-Rural Development
UME-DEMS Upgrading of the Medical Equipment of DEMS
USPL U.S. Public Law
WB World Bank
WFP Work and Financial Plan
WHO World Health Organization
YRP Yolanda Reconstruction Program
ZDN Zamboanga del Norte
ZDS Zamboanga del Sur
ZSP Zamboanga Sibugay Province
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1
CONSOLIDATED AUDIT REPORT ON OFFICIAL DEVELOPMENT ASSISTANCE
FOR THE CALENDAR YEAR 2017
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Legal Basis
Official Development Assistance is governed by Republic Act (RA) No. 8182, approved on June 11, 1996 as amended by RA No. 8555, approved on February 26, 1998, entitled:
The law was issued to facilitate the absorption and optimize the utilization of ODA
resources. It also excluded ODA loans from foreign debt limit of US$10 billion or its equivalent in other foreign currencies as set under Presidential Decree (PD) No. 1939, the law amending RA No. 4860. The ODA loan remains the preferred source of financing priority development projects of the country due to its lower interest rate and longer maturity periods compared to other foreign loans.
Under Section 2 of RA 8182, ODA is defined as a loan, or a loan and grant, which
meets all of the following criteria:
a. It must be administered with the objective of promoting sustainable social and economic development and welfare of the Philippines;
b. It must be contracted with governments of foreign countries with whom the
Philippines has diplomatic, trade relations or bilateral agreements or which are members of the United Nations, their agencies and international or multilateral lending institutions;
c. There are no available comparable financial instruments in the capital market;
and
d. It must contain a grant element of at least twenty-five percent (25%). Grant element is the reduction enjoyed by the borrower whenever the debt service payments which shall include both principal and interest and expressed at their present values discounted at ten percent (10%) are less than the face value of the loan or loan and grant. The grant element of a loan or loan and grant is computed at the ratio of (i) the difference between the face value of the loan or loan and grant and the debt service payments to (ii) the face value of the loan or the loan and grant.
Public debt is governed by RA No. 4860, issued on August 8, 1966. Under Section
1 of this Act, the President of the Philippines is authorized, in behalf of the Republic of the Philippines, to contract such loans, credits and indebtedness with foreign governments, agencies or instrumentalities of such foreign governments, foreign financial institutions, or
“An Act Excluding Official Development Assistance (ODA) from the Foreign Debt Limit in order to Facilitate the Absorption and Optimize the Utilization of ODA Resources, Amending for the Purpose Paragraph 1, Section 2 of RA No. 4860, as amended”.
2
other international organizations, with whom, or belonging to countries with which, the Philippines has diplomatic relations, as may be necessary and upon such terms and conditions as may be agreed upon, to enable the Government of the Republic of the Philippines (ROP) to finance, either directly or through any government office, agency or instrumentality or any government-owned or controlled corporations, industrial, agricultural or other economic development purposes or projects authorized by law. It is also provided in this section that the authority of the President of the Philippines shall include the power to issue, for the purposes herein before stated, bonds for sale in the international markets, the income from which shall be fully tax-exempt in the Philippines.
The total amount of loans, credits and indebtedness, excluding interests, which the
President is authorized to incur, as provided under Section 2 thereof, shall not exceed US$1 billion or its equivalent in other foreign currencies at the exchange rate prevailing at the time the loans, credits and indebtedness are incurred, provided that the total loans, credit and indebtedness incurred shall not exceed US$250 million or its equivalent in other currencies in the fiscal year of the approval of the Act, and US$250 million or its equivalent in other currencies every fiscal year thereafter.
The foreign debt limit was, however, increased under PD No. 1939 issued on June
27, 1984 amending RA No. 4860 to an amount not exceeding US$10 billion or its equivalent in other foreign currencies at the exchange rate prevailing at the time the loans, credits or indebtedness are incurred at terms of payment of not less than 10 years except those contracted in the interest of national security and rehabilitation resulting from natural calamities. Section 2 of PD No. 1939 further amended the last paragraph of Section 3 of RA 4860 to read as follows:
The President, under Section 20, Article VII, of the 1987 Philippine Constitution, may
also contract or guarantee foreign loans in behalf of the Philippines with the prior concurrence of the Monetary Board, and subject to such limitations as may be provided by law. The Monetary Board shall, within thirty days from the end of every quarter of the calendar year, submit to Congress a complete report of its decision on applications for loans to be contracted or guaranteed by the Government or government-owned and controlled corporations (GOCC) which would have the effect of increasing the foreign debt, and containing other matters as may be provided by law. As discussed earlier, ODA loans are excluded from foreign debt limit of US$10 billion or its equivalent pursuant to RA No. 8182.
1.2 Scope and Sources 1.2.1 The report contains data on 459 ODA loans consisting of 73 program loans and 386
project loans contracted and guaranteed by the National Government (NG) from January 1, 1995 to December 31, 2017. Project loans are foreign loans obtained to finance specific projects. On the other hand, Program loans are multi-purpose foreign loans not intended to finance specific projects, but are conditioned on basic changes
“The total amount of loans, credits or indebtedness incurred, and the proceeds of bonds, securities or other evidences floated or issued, which may be guaranteed by the President under this Section shall not be more than US$7.5 billion or its equivalent in other foreign currencies at the exchange rate prevailing at the time the guarantee is made excluding interests and other normal banking charges imposed or charged by the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD), the Asian Development Bank (ADB) and other similar international financial institutions”.
3
in economic, monetary or fiscal policies, among others. RA No. 8182, as amended by RA No. 8555, applies only to loans contracted from January 1, 1995 onward.
The status and breakdown of 459 ODA loans with cumulative net loan commitment (CNLC) 1amounting to P1.93 trillion (US$38.64 billion) are presented in Table I.
1.2.2 The loans were obtained from bilateral, multilateral and commercial creditors and utilized for various projects under the Sector of Infrastructure (Infra); Social Reform and Community Development (SRCD); Industry, Trade and Tourism (ITT); Agriculture, Agrarian Reform and Natural Resources (AARNR); and Governance and Institutions Development (GID). The graphical presentation of the loan structure by Sector and Creditor Type is shown in Chart I.
Chart I – Loan Structure by Sector and Creditor Type Indicating the Number of Loans Contracted and CNLC
1 The specified amount of loan or line of credit is made available to the named borrower at a certain interest rate, during a certain period and,
usually, for a certain purpose. The cumulative net loan commitment (CNLC) is the amount of loan commitments after deducting the amount of
commitments cancelled as of the given period.
Program Project Total USD PHP
4 43 47 9.24 461.62
2 11 13 1.74 86.89
2 10 12 1.70 85.17
1 1 0.03 1.72
67 325 392 27.63 1,380.29
0 7 7 0.03 1.51
73 386 459 38.64 1,930.31
USD 15.07 23.56
PHP 753.08 1,177.24
Difference between totals and sum of components is due to rounding off.
Closed
Table I – Status and Breakdown of Loans
StatusBreakdown
CNLC
(in billion)
Not Yet Effective
Active
New:
Newly Signed/ Effective
Cancelled
Total
CNLC (in billion) 38.64
1,930.31
4
(Chart I, continued)
1.2.3 The data are sourced from the following:
a) Status Report on NG Direct and Guaranteed Loans prepared by the Debt
Monitoring and Analysis Division (DMAD), Bureau of the Treasury (BTr) showing the details of foreign loans by loan account number, creditor and implementing agency with summary on the type of loans and creditors.
b) List of ODA loans signed during the year forwarded to the Commission on Audit
(COA) by the Department of Finance (DOF) and Status of Loans submitted by the National Economic Development Authority (NEDA).
c) Summary of Debt Service Expenditures - Foreign prepared by the National
Government Debt Accounting Division (NGDAD), BTr showing payments by the NG broken down into Principal, Interests, Commitment Fees and Other Charges for the Direct and Relent Loans.
d) Actual Debt Service, ODA - Funded Projects prepared by concerned GOCCs
showing direct payments by the GOCCs to their creditors for the NG Guaranteed loans.
1.2.4 The Project Status and Consolidated Audit Observations and Recommendations as
of December 31, 2017 to be presented later are based on the reports submitted by the concerned auditors of the implementing agencies.
The above table does not include Foreign-Assisted Projects (FAPs) funded from ODA grants.
1.3 Methodology
COA maintains database on ODA loans which is updated annually based on the Status Report submitted by the DMAD BTr, the list of new loans submitted by DOF, the status of loans extracted from NEDA Report and project status as reported by the implementing agencies (IAs).
Based on updated database file, COA prepares schedules of ODA loans by creditor,
sector and IA indicating the data on commitments, availments, repayments, and undrawn and outstanding balances per loan account and project. COA adopted the sectoral classifications of loans/projects being used by NEDA. The data are presented in tables and charts with narrative discussion.
US$ PHP
Bilateral 45 6 11 140 20 222 92.85 44.30 37.37 667.52 57.87 18.01 899.91
Commercial 8 1 1 37 12 59 11.51 1.23 0.31 58.07 8.99 1.60 80.12
Multilateral 44 16 13 53 52 178 108.91 174.97 33.55 164.13 468.73 19.02 950.29
Total PhP 97 23 25 230 84 459 213.27 220.50 71.23 889.72 535.59 38.64 1,930.31
4.27 4.41 1.43 17.81 10.72 38.64
Difference between totals and sum of components is due to rounding off.
Infra. SRCDTotal
Total US$
CNLC by Sector and Creditor Type
(in billion)
AARNR GID ITT Infra. SRCD AARNR GID ITT
Number of Loans Contracted by
Sector
Total
Source/
Creditor
Type
5
All balances were translated to local currency equivalent using the BSP weighted average rate at reporting date which was published on the first working day of the ensuing year. Third currency balances are first converted to US Dollars (USD) before translating to Philippine Peso (PhP) using the exchange rate at reporting date.
Considering the provisions under Section 8 (b) of RA No. 8182, as amended,
mandating COA to conduct an audit of ongoing and completed projects and submit report to Congress, COA directed Auditors of the National Government Agencies (NGAs), GOCCs and Local Government Units (LGUs) implementing ODA funded projects to undertake the audit of said projects and submit their ODA Audit Report to their Cluster and Sector head for consolidation. The consolidated report are required to be submitted to the Office of the Assistant Commissioner, National Government Sector (NGS), for preparation of overall consolidated Audit Report on ODA Funded Projects. The consolidated audit observations and recommendations were grouped into audit issues for emphasis.
2.0 HIGHLIGHTS OF THE REPORT
6
2.0 HIGHLIGHTS OF THE REPORT
The NG contracted 459 ODA loans (including seven cancelled loans), from 1995 to 2017, with Cumulative Gross Loan Commitments (CGLC) of P2.14 trillion (US$42.93 billion) and Cumulative Net Loan Commitments (CNLC) of P1.93 trillion (US$38.64 billion) for financing 409 programs and projects of the Government. Of the total CNLC, P1.48 trillion (US$29.65 billion), representing 76.75 percent, was availed as of December 31, 2017, leaving total undrawn amount of P448.85 billion (US$8.98 billion). The undrawn amount represents 23.25 percent of the CNLC. On the other hand, of the total amount availed of P1.48 trillion (US$29.65 billion) as of December 31, 2017, cumulative repayment as of the same period amounted to P562.64 billion (US$11.26 billion) leaving outstanding balance of P918.53 billion (US$18.37 billion), as presented in Chart II.
Chart II – Loan Status (in billion PhP)
CGLC CLC CNLC CNLCCum.
Availments
Undrawn
Balances
Cum.
AvailmentsRepayments
Outstanding
Balances
Amount 2,144.68 214.37 1,930.31 1,930.31 1,481.47 448.85 1,481.47 562.64 918.83
Percentage 100.00 10.00 90.00 100.00 76.75 23.25 100.00 37.98 62.02 In 2017, 10 ODA loans were contracted with net loan commitments of P74.85 billion
(US$1.50 billion). Of the net loan commitments, only P299.75 million (US$6.0 million) were availed leaving undrawn amount of P74.55 billion (US$1.49 billion). This amount represents 99.60 percent of the total net loan commitments for the loans contracted during the year. On the other hand, debt service expenditures for 2017 amounted to P66.97 billion inclusive of interest of P16.20 billion, commitment fee of P230.17 million, guaranty fee of P644.21 million and other charges of P1.41 billion.
Of the 409 programs and projects financed out of these loans, 336 were completed, 53
are on-going, 8 are yet to be started, while 12 were cancelled.
2.1 Gross Commitments – P2.14 trillion (US$42.93 billion)
The CGLC from 459 ODA loans as of December 31, 2017 amounted to P2.14 trillion or US$42.93 billion. Of the amount, P214.37 billion (US$4.29 billion) or 10.0 percent represents Cumulative Loan Cancellations (CLC) leaving CNLC of P1.93 trillion (US$38.64 billion), as graphically presented in Chart III.
Chart III – CGLC, CLC and CNLC (in billion PhP)
7
(Chart III, continued)
US$ PHP US$ PHP US$ PHP
1 Bilateral 222 20.05 1,001.85 2.04 101.94 18.01 899.91 46.62
2 Commercial 59 1.90 94.78 0.29 14.67 1.60 80.12 4.15
3 Multilateral 178 20.98 1,048.05 1.96 97.76 19.02 950.29 49.23
459 42.93 2,144.68 4.29 214.37 38.64 1,930.31 100.00
Difference between totals and sum of components is due to rounding off.
Creditor Type No. of
Loan
CGLC CLC CNLC % to
Total
Total
% to CGLC 100.00 10.00 90.00
2.2 Availments – P1.48 trillion (US$29.65 billion)
ODA loans availed by the Government were intended to implement programs and projects of the different sectors. Total cumulative availments from 452 loan accounts (excluding cancelled loans) as of December 31, 2017 amounted to P1.48 trillion (US$29.65 billion). Of the total availments, P70.21 billion (US$1.41 billion) were availed in CY 2017. The current year and cumulative loan availments by creditor type, and distribution by project and government sector are presented in Table II.
US$ PHP US$ PHP US$ PHP
1 AARNR 0.14 7.02 9.99
2 GID 0.02 0.99 1.41
3 ITT - - -
4 Infra. 0.31 15.27 21.75
5 0.94 46.93 66.85
Total 1.41 70.21 100.00 Total 1.41 70.21 100.00 Total 1.41 70.21 100.00
1 AARNR 3.42 170.86 11.53
2 GID 3.91 195.58 13.20
3 ITT 1.43 71.22 4.81
4 Infra. 11.86 592.49 39.99
5 9.03 451.33 30.46
Total 29.65 1,481.47 100.00 Total 29.65 1,481.47 100.00 Total 29.65 1,481.47 100.00
Difference between totals and sum of components is due to rounding off.
76.55
10.63 0.72
3 Multilateral 15.70 784.42 52.95 3 NGAs 22.70
2Commercial 1.60 80.04 2 LGUs 0.21
1,134.10
5.40
Cumulative Availments
1Bilateral 12.35 617.00 41.65 1 GOCCs 6.74
95.66
336.73 22.73
3 Multilateral 1.13 56.60 80.63 3 NGAs
2 LGUs -
SRCD
0.02 0.99
1.34
- -
67.16
2Commercial 1.41
4.34 0.06 3.05
2017 Availments
1Bilateral 0.25 12.61 17.97 1 GOCCs
Project
Sector
Amount % to
Total Creditor Type
Amount % to
Total
Go vern-
ment
Secto r
Amount % to
Total
Table II- Current and Cumulative Loan Availments by Project and Government Sector (in billion)Sources Distribution
SRCD
2.3 Undrawn Commitments – P448.85 billion (US$8.98 billion)
The undrawn commitments of P448.85 billion (US$8.98 billion) as of December
31, 2017 represents 23.25 percent of the CNLC. Shown in Chart IV is the graphical presentation of CNLC, in relation to availments and undrawn balances as of December 31, 2017, summarized by type of creditor.
Chart IV- Schedule of Availments and Undrawn Balances by Type of Creditor (in billion PhP)
8
(Chart IV, continued)
US$ PHP US$ PHP US$ PHP
1 Bilateral 18.01 899.91 12.35 617.00 68.56 5.66 282.91 31.44
2 Commercial 1.60 80.12 1.60 80.04 99.90 0.00 0.08 0.10
3 Multilateral 19.02 950.29 15.70 784.42 82.55 3.32 165.86 17.45
38.64 1,930.31 29.65 1,481.47 76.75 8.98 448.85 23.25
Difference between totals and sum of components is due to rounding off.
Total
Creditor Type CNLC
Cumulative
Availments % to
CNLC
Undrawn
Commitments % to CNLC
2.4 Repayments – P562.64 billion (US$11.26 billion) and Outstanding Balances – P918.83 billion (US$18.39 billion)
Out of the cumulative availments of P1.48 trillion (US$29.65 billion), P562.64 billion (US$11.26 billion) was already repaid with outstanding balances of P918.83 billion (US$18.39 billion). The amount is equivalent to 62.02 percent of the total cumulative availments which represents balances from 330 loan accounts out of 452 total loan (net of cancelled loans) accounts.
Shown in Chart V are the loan cumulative Availments, Repayments and Balances
as of December 31, 2017, summarized by type of creditor.
Chart V - Loan Availments, Repayments and Balances by Type of Creditor
(in billion)
US$ PHP US$ PHP US$ PHP
1 Bilateral 12.35 617.00 5.05 252.16 40.87 7.30 364.84 59.13
2 Commercial 1.60 80.04 1.14 57.14 71.39 0.46 22.90 28.61
3 Multilateral 15.70 784.42 5.07 253.34 32.30 10.63 531.08 67.70
29.65 1,481.47 11.26 562.64 37.98 18.39 918.83 62.02 Total
Creditor Type
Cumulative
Availments Repayments
% to
Avail-
ments
Outstanding
Balances % to
A vailments
2.5 Debt Service Expenditures for the year – P66.97 billion
During the year, the total debt service payments to creditors amounted to P66.97 billion inclusive of interest, commitment fees and other charges, as presented in Table III.
9
Principal Interest Commit-
ment Fees
Guaranty
Fee
Other
Charges Total
% to
Total
1 Bilateral 20,397.97 4,893.28 111.56 462.39 964.34 26,829.55 40.06
2 Commercial 2,521.84 772.40 6.07 50.12 140.47 3,490.89 5.21
3 Multilateral 25,562.95 10,537.82 112.54 131.70 306.87 36,651.88 54.73
48,482.76 16,203.50 230.17 644.21 1,411.69 66,972.32 100.00
72.39 24.19 0.34 0.96 2.11 100.00
Difference between the totals and the sum of the components is due to rounding off.
Table III- Debt Service Expenditures by Creditor Type (in million PHP)
Creditor Type
Total
% to Total
By Project Sector, 36.42 percent of debt service expenditures represent
repayment to loans falling under infrastructure sector, as shown in Table IV.
Principal Interest Commit-
ment Fees
Guaranty
Fee
Other
Charges Total
% to
Total
1 AARNR 7,292.11 2,070.64 47.27 21.55 161.75 9,593.33 14.32
2 GID 11,074.12 2,372.47 1.60 - 268.14 13,716.33 20.48
3 ITT 3,674.43 518.23 0.22 60.51 30.56 4,283.94 6.40
4 Infra. 18,493.26 4,466.42 72.75 562.16 795.15 24,389.74 36.42
5 SRCD 7,948.84 6,775.75 108.33 - 156.07 14,988.98 22.38
48,482.76 16,203.50 230.17 644.21 1,411.69 66,972.32 100.00
72.39 24.19 0.34 0.96 2.11 100.00
Table IV - Debt Service Expenditures by Sector (in million PHP)
Sector
Total
% to Total
Difference between the totals and the sum of the components is due to rounding off.
2.6 Commitment Fees for the year – P230.17 million
Commitment fees paid for 35 loan accounts during the year alone for the undrawn balance amounted to P230.17 million or 0.24 percent of the undrawn balances of these accounts amounting to P96.11 billion, as presented in Table V.
NG Direct NG-
Guaranteed
NG
Relent Total
1 Bilateral 18 50,401.15 76.59 34.97 - 111.56 0.22
2 Commercial 2 61.78 6.07 - - 6.07 9.82
3 Multilateral 15 45,647.31 112.32 0.22 - 112.54 0.25
35 96,110.24 194.98 35.18 - 230.17 0.24
84.71 15.29 - 100.00
Difference between the totals and the sum of the components is due to rounding off.
Table V- Commitment Fees Paid by Type of Creditors and Loans (in million PHP)
Total
% to Total
Creditor TypeUndrawn
Balance
Commitment Fees % to
Undrawn
balance
No. of
Loans
2.7 Audit Observations and Recommendations
The audit observations and recommendations, summarized and grouped together
by audit issues or by nature of deficiencies were presented in Part 4. Details are discussed in the Annual Audit Reports of the concerned Agency.
3.0 STATUS OF ODA LOANS –
FUNDED PROGRAMS AND
PROJECTS
10
3.0 STATUS OF ODA LOANS – FUNDED PROGRAMS AND PROJECTS
3.1 Cumulative Gross Loan Commitments (CGLC) – P2.14 trillion (US$42.93 billion)
As discussed earlier, of the 459 loans contracted by the NG as of December 31, 2017 with CGLC amounting to P2.14 trillion (US$42.93 billion), 10 loans amounting to P74.85 billion (US$1.50 billion), representing 3.49 percent, were secured and signed during the year.
The 10 new loans were secured by NGAs and GOCCs with 48.29 percent of the gross
commitment going to the Social Reform and Community Development Sector with the DILG, TESDA/DTI/DOLE and BTr/SEC as the implementing agencies. The projects to be financed from the new loans for implementation by 11 NGAs and LBP are tabulated in Table VI.
During the year, commitments amounting to P19.91 billion (US$398.53 million)
covering eight loan accounts were cancelled, as presented in Table VII.
US$ PHP US$ PHP US$ PHP
TOTAL 1.50 74.85 100.00 0.01 0.30 100.00 1.49 74.55 100.00
Agriculture, Natural Resources & Agrarian Reform 0.12 6.02 8.05 0.01 0.30 100.00 0.11 5.72 7.68
1 PH-P264 Harnessing Agribusiness
Opportunities through Robust
and Vibrant Entrepreneurship
LBP JICA 0.04 2.19 36.42 - - - 0.04 2.19 38.32
2 8762-PH Inclusive Partnerships for
Agricultural Competitiveness
Project
DAR IBRD 0.07 3.31 55.01 - - - 0.07 3.31 57.89
3 200000177
3-PH
Scaling-Up the Second
Cordillera Highland
Agricultural Resource
DA IFAD 0.01 0.52 8.57 0.01 0.30 100.00 0.00 0.22 3.78
Infrastructure 0.66 32.83 43.86 - - 0.00 0.66 32.83 44.03
4 3589-PHIInfrastructure Preparation
and Innovation Facility
DOTr/
DPWHADB 0.10 5.00 15.22 - - - 0.10 5.00 15.22
5 PH-P265Cavite Industrial Area Flood
Risk Management ProjectDPWH JICA 0.14 7.09 21.59 - - - 0.14 7.09 21.59
6 8784-PH
Metro Manila Flood
Management Project (MMFMP -
Phase 1) (cofinanced w ith
AIIB)
DPWH/
MMDAIBRD 0.21 10.37 31.59 - - - 0.21 10.37 31.59
7000023-1-
PHL
Metro Manila Flood
Management Project (MMFMP -
Phase 1) (cofinanced w ith
IRBD)
DPWH/
MMDAAIIB 0.21 10.37 31.59 - - - 0.21 10.37 31.59
Social Reform & Community Development 0.72 36.00 48.10 - - 0.00 0.72 36.00 48.29
8 CPH 1026
01 R
Local Governance Finance
and Fiscal Decentralization
Reform Program, Subprogram
2
DILG AFD 0.12 6.03 16.74 - - - 0.12 6.03 16.74
9 3530-PHI Facilitating Youth-School-to-
Work Transition Program -
Subprogram 1
TESDA/
DTI/DOLEADB 0.30 14.99 41.63 - - - 0.30 14.99 41.63
10 3595-PHI Encouraging Investment
through Capital Market
Reforms Program -
Subprogram 2
BTr/SEC ADB 0.30 14.99 41.63 - - - 0.30 14.99 41.63
Table VI - List of New ODA Loans (in billion)Loan Account
No.Name of Project IA
Cre-
ditor
Commitments % to
Total
Availments % to
Total
Undrawn Balance % to
Total
USD PHP
398.53 19,909.81
AGRICULTURE, AGRARIAN REFORM AND NATURAL RESOURCES 1.65 82.60
1 PH-P242 Agrarian Reform Infrastructure Support Project,
Phase III
DAR JBIC 1.15 57.67
Total
Table VII - Cancelled Commitments for 2017 (in million)
Loan Account No. Name of Project IA CreditorAmount
11
3.1.1 By Creditor
The CNLC, considering cancellations as of December 31, 2017, is presented by creditor in Table VIII.
USD PHP
2 2311 PHI Integrated Coastal Resources Management Project DENR ADB 0.50 24.94
INFRASTRUCTURE 396.66 19,816.39
3 PH-P243 Environmental Development Project DBP JBIC 0.28 14.10
4 2964-PHI Market Transformation through Introduction of
Energy Efficient Electric Vehicles Project
DOE ADB 268.06 13,391.76
5 8261-PHI Market Transformation Thru Introduction of Energy
Efficient Electric Vehicles Project
DOE ADB 91.70 4,581.06
6 BAC (213.469) Improvement of Nat'l Secondary Road System DPWH BAC 0.07 3.46
7 PH-P244 Agricultural Credit Support Project LBP JBIC 36.55 1,826.00
SOCIAL REFORM AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 0.22 10.81
8 KFW
No.7113011
Health Sector Reform Project DOH KFW 0.22 10.81
Difference between the totals and the sum of the components is due to rounding off.
(Table VII, continued)
Loan Account No. Name of Project IA CreditorAmount
USD PHP USD PHP USD PHP
459 42,929.69 2,144,681.28 4,290.98 214,368.60 38,638.71 1,930,312.67 100.00
Bilateral 222 20,053.80 1,001,847.64 2,040.45 101,936.99 18,013.34 899,910.66 46.62
1 JICA 125 15,475.74 773,136.94 1,622.98 81,080.61 13,852.76 692,056.33 35.85
2 ECGD 5 771.36 38,535.54 - - 771.36 38,535.54 2.00
3 BNP PARIBAS 4 1,065.45 53,227.53 344.56 17,213.55 720.89 36,013.99 1.87
4 KEXIM 15 629.10 31,428.80 14.71 735.12 614.39 30,693.68 1.59
5 AFD 5 556.26 27,789.42 - - 556.26 27,789.42 1.44
6 KFW 21 344.90 17,230.55 35.00 1,748.70 309.90 15,481.85 0.80
7 USPL 10 235.00 11,740.13 0.87 43.59 234.13 11,696.54 0.61
8 AIIB 1 207.60 10,371.44 - - 207.60 10,371.44 0.54
9 IBRD 1 207.60 10,371.44 - - 207.60 10,371.44 0.54
10 ICO 9 117.36 5,863.17 0.02 1.00 117.34 5,862.16 0.30
11 ANZ/EFIC 1 97.68 4,879.77 2.32 115.69 95.36 4,764.08 0.25
12 EFIC 3 89.48 4,470.48 0.22 10.86 89.27 4,459.62 0.23
13 FP 9 46.56 2,326.20 2.45 122.42 44.11 2,203.78 0.11
14 EIB 1 36.68 1,832.28 - - 36.68 1,832.28 0.09
15Natixis
(French Gov't)1 34.40 1,718.60 - - 34.40 1,718.60 0.09
16 Artigiancassa 1 31.59 1,578.19 - - 31.59 1,578.19 0.08
17 KFAED 1 21.29 1,063.82 1.54 76.80 19.76 987.02 0.05
18 SOCIETE GEN 1 15.09 753.96 - - 15.09 753.96 0.04
19 KBC 1 13.69 684.03 0.00 0.00 13.69 684.03 0.04
20 Fortis Bank 1 10.23 511.09 - - 10.23 511.09 0.03
21 ITALY II 1 9.79 489.02 0.04 2.17 9.75 486.85 0.03
22 Belgian 1 7.62 380.43 0.06 2.88 7.56 377.55 0.02
23 JFA 1 4.86 242.72 0.04 1.80 4.82 240.92 0.01
24 SFD 1 20.00 999.16 15.64 781.20 4.36 217.97 0.01
No. of
Loans
Table VIII- Schedule of Cumulative Net Loan Commitments by Creditor
(in million)
CreditorCGLC CLC CNLC % to
Total
CNLC
Total
Commitments
12
Inclusive of the CNLC are current year’s commitments on new loans amounting to P74.85 billion (US$1.50 billion) as presented in Table VI.
3.1.2 By Project Sector
Of the CNLC, 46.09 percent was intended for the implementation of projects categorized under the infrastructure sector account, as presented in Table IX.
USD PHP USD PHP USD PHP
25 SIDA 1 2.24 112.02 0.01 0.59 2.23 111.43 0.01
26 LEONIA BANK 1 2.22 110.91 0.00 0.00 2.22 110.91 0.01
Multilateral 178 20,978.62 1,048,049.84 1,956.94 97,764.59 19,021.68 950,285.26 49.23
1 ADB 86 11,535.35 576,282.95 1,187.59 59,329.82 10,347.75 516,953.13 26.78
2 IBRD 72 9,103.56 454,795.75 742.56 37,096.64 8,361.01 417,699.11 21.64
3 IFAD 11 201.21 10,052.20 8.76 437.71 192.45 9,614.49 0.50
4 OPEC 6 97.00 4,845.93 16.37 817.56 80.63 4,028.36 0.21
5 EIB 1 26.50 1,323.89 - - 26.50 1,323.89 0.07
6 NDF 2 15.00 749.13 1.66 82.85 13.34 666.28 0.03
Commercial 59 1,897.27 94,783.79 293.59 14,667.03 1,603.68 80,116.76 4.15
1 CEXIM 6 790.52 39,492.61 220.60 11,020.64 569.92 28,471.97 1.47
2 BAC 6 236.14 11,797.00 0.07 3.46 236.07 11,793.54 0.61
3 ECGD 5 142.97 7,142.68 - - 142.97 7,142.68 0.37
4 EDC 2 124.44 6,216.77 2.26 112.96 122.18 6,103.82 0.32
5BNP
PARIBAS5 147.21 7,354.24 38.22 1,909.29 108.99 5,444.95 0.28
6 CAMC 2 59.97 2,995.76 4.07 203.23 55.90 2,792.54 0.14
7 BBV 5 52.15 2,605.36 0.02 1.00 52.13 2,604.36 0.13
8 RZOA 2 47.10 2,353.09 - - 47.10 2,353.09 0.12
9 FP 10 40.09 2,002.93 2.19 109.19 37.91 1,893.74 0.10
10 CCDF 2 45.54 2,274.89 14.58 728.56 30.95 1,546.34 0.08
11Banco
Santander1 25.75 1,286.61 - - 25.75 1,286.61 0.07
12 ANZ/EFIC 1 23.44 1,171.14 0.59 29.42 22.85 1,141.72 0.06
13 BA 1 22.50 1,124.05 0.02 1.13 22.48 1,122.92 0.06
14 ERSTE 1 21.91 1,094.80 0.00 0.00 21.91 1,094.80 0.06
15 NIB 1 21.38 1,068.06 - - 21.38 1,068.06 0.06
16 ICO 1 18.95 946.57 - - 18.95 946.57 0.05
17 ING Bank 1 17.61 879.72 - - 17.61 879.72 0.05
18 EFIC 1 14.80 739.38 0.72 36.08 14.08 703.30 0.04
19 SOCIETE GEN 1 12.65 632.00 0.12 5.77 12.54 626.23 0.03
20 Fortis Bank 1 7.99 399.38 - - 7.99 399.38 0.02
21 Bancaja 1 7.01 350.42 - - 7.01 350.42 0.02
22 SIDA 1 10.00 499.58 3.81 190.15 6.19 309.43 0.02
23 NDF 1 7.14 356.73 6.33 316.15 0.81 40.58 0.00
0.00 - less than five thousand.
Difference between totals and sum of components is due to rounding off.
No. of
Loans
(Table VIII, continued)
CreditorCGLC CLC CNLC % to
Total
CNLC
13
3.1.3 By Implementing Agency
Around 80.36 percent of the CNLC represents loans by the NGAs of which 26.51 and 15.87 percent were availed by the DOF and DPWH, respectively. The implementing agencies (IAs) of the loans secured are presented in Table X.
USD PHP% to
TotalUSD PHP
% to
TotalUSD PHP
% to
Total
Infra. 20.44 1,021.36 47.62 2.63 131.64 61.41 17.81 889.72 46.09
SRCD 10.88 543.38 25.34 0.16 7.78 3.63 10.72 535.59 27.75
GID 4.94 246.75 11.51 0.53 26.26 12.25 4.41 220.50 11.42
AARNR 5.10 254.56 11.87 0.83 41.28 19.26 4.27 213.27 11.05
ITT 1.57 78.64 3.67 0.15 7.41 3.46 1.43 71.23 3.69
Total 42.93 2,144.68 100.00 4.29 214.37 100.00 38.64 1,930.31 100.00
% to CGLC
Difference between totals and sum of components is due to rounding off.
Table IX - Schedule of Cumulative Net Loan Commitments by Sector (in billion)
Project
Sector
CGLC Cumulative Cancellation CNLC
10.00 90.00100.00
USD PHP USD PHP USD PHP
Total 459 42,929.69 2,144,681.28 4,290.98 214,368.60 38,638.71 1,930,312.67 100.00
NGAs 323 33,665.72 1,681,872.28 2,616.47 130,713.83 31,049.25 1,551,158.45 80.36
1 DOF 41 10,802.65 539,678.86 561.39 28,046.07 10,241.26 511,632.79 26.51
2 DPWH 87 6,475.35 323,495.35 344.42 17,206.49 6,130.93 306,288.86 15.87
3 DOTr 42 5,116.51 255,610.64 389.59 19,462.94 4,726.92 236,147.71 12.23
4 DSWD 9 2,765.23 138,145.26 4.41 220.10 2,760.82 137,925.16 7.15
5 DepEd 13 1,622.43 81,053.14 76.97 3,845.04 1,545.46 77,208.10 4.00
6 DAR 25 1,327.97 66,342.53 105.41 5,266.15 1,222.55 61,076.38 3.16
7 DA 23 1,229.53 61,425.09 204.92 10,237.41 1,024.61 51,187.68 2.65
8 DILG 11 755.34 37,735.27 43.76 2,186.39 711.58 35,548.88 1.84
9 DENR 13 803.54 40,143.04 408.09 20,387.18 395.45 19,755.86 1.02
10 DOE 4 778.51 38,892.90 403.73 20,169.61 374.78 18,723.29 0.97
11 TESDA 6 370.72 18,520.40 7.30 364.65 363.42 18,155.75 0.94
12 SC 2 321.90 16,081.48 1.29 64.44 320.61 16,017.04 0.83
13 DOH 19 339.90 16,980.95 27.49 1,373.23 312.42 15,607.72 0.81
14 BTr/SEC 1 300.00 14,987.40 - - 300.00 14,987.40 0.78
15 BOC 2 184.76 9,230.26 0.12 6.05 184.64 9,224.21 0.48
16 BFAR 9 178.50 8,917.71 20.36 1,017.23 158.14 7,900.49 0.41
17 PRRC 2 88.69 4,430.88 12.00 599.51 76.69 3,831.37 0.20
18 OCD 1 60.31 3,012.97 - - 60.31 3,012.97 0.16
19 BFP 2 49.44 2,469.88 - - 49.44 2,469.88 0.13
20 NAMRIA 1 25.75 1,286.61 - - 25.75 1,286.61 0.07
21 DOT 1 18.12 905.18 0.70 34.87 17.42 870.31 0.05
22 PMMA 2 16.03 801.06 0.10 4.82 15.94 796.24 0.04
23 UP 2 13.56 677.35 - - 13.56 677.35 0.04
24 OP 4 9.98 498.54 0.14 7.00 9.84 491.54 0.03
25 BIR 1 11.00 549.54 4.30 214.65 6.70 334.88 0.02
GOCCs 129 9,033.42 451,291.40 1,656.82 82,771.28 7,376.60 368,520.12 19.09
1 DBP 24 1,706.88 85,272.13 296.90 14,832.56 1,409.98 70,439.57 3.65
Table X - Schedule of Cumulative Net Loan Commitments by Implementing Agency
(in million)
IACGLC Cumulative Cancellation CNLC
% to
Total
CNLC
No. of
Loans
14
3.2 Availments – P1.48 trillion (US$29.65 billion)
As of December 31, 2017, cumulative availments reached P1.48 trillion (US$29.65
billion), equivalent to 76.75 percent of the CNLC, as presented in Chart II. Of the total availments, P70.21 billion (US$1.41 million) or 4.74 percent were availed during the year. 3.2.1 By Creditor
The cumulative and current year availments from different creditors are presented in Table XI with cumulative availments from multilateral and bilateral creditors at 80.63 percent and 17.97 percent, respectively. Only around 1.41 percent was availed for commercial loans.
USD PHP USD PHP USD PHP
2 LBP 23 1,371.69 68,526.72 170.56 8,521.06 1,201.12 60,005.66 3.11
3 PSALM 18 1,459.70 72,923.87 297.96 14,885.68 1,161.74 58,038.19 3.01
4 NIA 13 842.67 42,098.09 53.83 2,689.29 788.84 39,408.80 2.04
5 LRTA 7 885.78 44,251.91 145.04 7,246.16 740.74 37,005.76 1.92
6 BCDA 1 525.90 26,272.99 8.00 399.86 517.90 25,873.13 1.34
7 MWSS 6 394.46 19,706.53 29.83 1,490.42 364.63 18,216.11 0.94
8 PPA 4 258.58 12,918.11 8.50 424.64 250.08 12,493.47 0.65
9 LWUA 7 273.84 13,680.29 90.23 4,507.57 183.61 9,172.73 0.48
10 NLRC 2 400.00 19,983.20 219.21 10,951.05 180.79 9,032.15 0.47
11 SBMA 5 246.58 12,318.41 73.06 3,650.07 173.51 8,668.34 0.45
12 PNOC 2 180.98 9,041.59 87.36 4,364.12 93.63 4,677.47 0.24
13 PHIVIDEC 1 73.63 3,678.58 0.01 0.45 73.62 3,678.13 0.19
14 NPC 3 213.48 10,664.88 148.10 7,399.02 65.37 3,265.86 0.17
15 SBGFC 3 56.22 2,808.48 0.26 12.97 55.96 2,795.51 0.14
16 PNR 2 46.68 2,332.24 0.01 0.28 46.68 2,331.96 0.12
17 PFDA 1 24.99 1,248.20 - - 24.99 1,248.20 0.06
18 NFA 3 19.86 992.09 0.04 1.89 19.82 990.20 0.05
19PTA
(TIEZA)1 12.04 601.67 0.01 0.67 12.03 601.01
0.03
20 LLDA 2 15.00 749.37 8.20 409.49 6.80 339.88 0.02
21 PEZA 1 24.46 1,222.04 19.70 984.06 4.76 237.99 0.01
LGUs 7 230.55 11,517.59 17.68 883.49 212.86 10,634.10 0.55
1 ARMM 6 191.99 9,591.52 6.46 322.89 185.53 9,268.63 0.48
2 PG-LDN 1 38.55 1,926.07 11.22 560.61 27.33 1,365.47 0.07
Difference between totals and sum of components is due to rounding off.
(Table X, continued)
IACGLC Cumulative Cancellation CNLC
% to
Total
CNLC
No. of
Loans
USD PHP USD PHP
Total Availments 459 29,654.25 1,481,466.99 100.00 1,405.30 70,205.95 100.00
Bilateral 222 12,350.44 617,003.36 41.65 252.50 12,614.17 17.97
1 JICA 125 9,776.84 488,431.19 32.97 237.02 11,841.19 16.87
2 ECGD 5 544.95 27,224.73 1.84 - - -
3 BNP PARIBAS 4 378.80 18,924.04 1.28 - - -
4 AFD 5 377.87 18,877.43 1.27 - - -
5 KEXIM 15 284.83 14,229.55 0.96 15.47 772.98 1.10
6 KFW 21 279.69 13,972.82 0.94 - - -
% to
Total
Table XI- Cumulative and Current Year Availments by Creditor (in million )
CreditorNo. of
Loans
Cumulative Availments CY Availments % to
Total
15
USD PHP USD PHP
7 USPL 10 234.13 11,696.54 0.79 - - 0.00
8 ICO 9 117.34 5,862.15 0.40 - - -
9 ANZ/EFIC 1 95.36 4,764.08 0.32 - - -
10 EFIC 3 89.27 4,459.62 0.30 - - -
11 FP 9 44.11 2,203.74 0.15 - - -
12 EIB 1 30.09 1,503.28 0.10 - - -
13 KFAED 1 19.76 987.02 0.07 - - -
14 SOCIETE GEN 1 14.59 729.12 0.05 - - -
15 KBC 1 13.69 684.03 0.05 - - -
16 Fortis Bank 1 10.23 511.09 0.03 - - -
17 ITALY II 1 9.75 486.85 0.03 - - -
18 Artigiancassa 1 7.95 397.34 0.03 - - -
19 Belgian 1 7.56 377.55 0.03 - - -
20 JFA 1 4.82 240.92 0.02 - - -
21 SFD 1 4.36 217.97 0.01 - - -
22 SIDA 1 2.23 111.43 0.01 - - -
23 LEONIA BANK 1 2.22 110.91 0.01 - - -
Multilateral 178 15,701.68 784,424.74 52.95 1,133.03 56,603.83 80.63
1 ADB 86 8,822.32 440,745.60 29.75 472.89 23,624.57 33.65
2 IBRD 72 6,666.57 333,048.28 22.48 646.62 32,304.05 46.01
3 IFAD 11 117.91 5,890.36 0.40 7.23 361.02 0.51
4 OPEC 6 58.36 2,915.72 0.20 6.29 314.18 0.45
5 EIB 1 23.19 1,158.50 0.08 - - -
6 NDF 2 13.34 666.28 0.04 - - -
Commercial 59 1,602.12 80,038.89 5.40 19.78 987.95 1.41
1 CEXIM 6 569.61 28,456.44 1.92 - - -
2 BAC 6 234.82 11,731.24 0.79 19.78 987.95 1.41
3 ECGD 5 142.97 7,142.68 0.48 - - -
4 EDC 2 122.18 6,103.82 0.41 - - -
5 BNP PARIBAS 5 108.99 5,444.95 0.37 - - -
6 CAMC 2 55.90 2,792.54 0.19 - - -
7 BBV 5 52.13 2,604.36 0.18 - - -
8 RZOA 2 47.10 2,353.09 0.16 - - -
9 FP 10 37.91 1,893.71 0.13 - - -
10Credit Com'l de
France2 30.95 1,546.34 0.10 - - -
11 Banco Santander 1 25.75 1,286.61 0.09 - - -
12 ANZ/EFIC 1 22.85 1,141.72 0.08 - - -
13 Bank of America 1 22.48 1,122.92 0.08 - - -
14 ERSTE 1 21.91 1,094.80 0.07 - - -
15 NIB 1 21.38 1,068.06 0.07 - - -
16 ICO 1 18.95 946.55 0.06 - - -
17 ING Bank 1 17.61 879.72 0.06 - - -
18 EFIC 1 14.08 703.30 0.05 - - -
19 SOCIETE GEN 1 12.54 626.23 0.04 - - -
20 Fortis Bank 1 7.99 399.38 0.03 - - -
21 Bancaja 1 7.01 350.42 0.02 - - -
22 SIDA 1 6.19 309.43 0.02 - - -
23 NDF 1 0.81 40.58 0.00 - - -
Difference between totals and sum of components is due to rounding off.
% to
Total
(Table XI, continued)
CreditorNo. of
Loans
Cumulative Availments CY Availments % to
Total
16
3.2.2 By Project Sector
Cumulatively, the infrastructure sector is the greatest beneficiary of ODA loans at 39.99 percent. However, for current year, the SRCD sector availed significant percentage of the loan at 66.85 percent.
3.2.3 By Implementing Agency
The NGAs’ availments reached P1.13 trillion (US$22.70 billion) or 76.55 percent of the total cumulative availments. The GOCCs availed P336.73 billion (US$6.74 billion) or 22.73 percent while LGUs availed P10.63 billion (US$0.21 billion) or 0.72 percent. The cumulative and current year availments by IAs, grouped by government sector, is presented in Table XIII.
USD PHP USD PHP
Total Availments 29.65 1,481.47 100.00 1.41 70.21 100.00
1 Infra. 11.86 592.49 39.99 0.31 15.27 21.75
2 SRCD 9.03 451.33 30.46 0.94 46.93 66.85
3 GID 3.91 195.58 13.20 0.02 0.99 1.41
4 AARNR 3.42 170.86 11.53 0.14 7.02 9.99
5 ITT 1.43 71.22 4.81 - - 0.00
CY Availments % to
Total
Table XII - Cumulative and Current Year Availments by Project Sector (in billion)
CreditorCumulative Availments % to
Total
USD PHP USD PHP
Total Availments 458 29.65 1,481.47 100.00 1.41 70.21 100.00
NGAs 322 22.70 1,134.10 76.55 1.34 67.16 95.66
1 DOF 41 9.74 486.78 32.86 - - -
2 DPWH 87 4.23 211.12 14.25 0.18 9.06 12.90
3 DSWD 9 2.07 103.35 6.98 0.56 27.98 39.85
4 DOTr 42 1.35 67.58 4.56 0.08 3.81 5.43
5 DepEd 13 1.28 63.91 4.31 0.13 6.46 9.21
6 DAR 25 0.95 47.26 3.19 0.02 1.15 1.64
7 DA 23 0.69 34.38 2.32 0.10 4.81 6.85
8 DILG 11 0.59 29.52 1.99 0.25 12.49 17.79
9 DOE 4 0.34 16.79 1.13 - - -
10 SC 2 0.32 16.02 1.08 - - -
11 DOH 19 0.31 15.59 1.05 - - -
12 DENR 13 0.22 10.97 0.74 0.01 0.40 0.57
13 BOC 2 0.18 9.22 0.62 - - -
14 BFAR 9 0.10 4.78 0.32 0.00 0.01 0.01
15 PRRC 2 0.08 3.83 0.26 - - -
16 TESDA 6 0.06 3.13 0.21 - - -
17 OCD 1 0.06 3.01 0.20 - - -
18 BFP 2 0.05 2.41 0.16 0.02 0.99 1.41
19 NAMRIA 1 0.03 1.29 0.09 - - -
20 DOT 1 0.02 0.87 0.06 - - -
21 PMMA 2 0.02 0.80 0.05 - - -
22 UP 2 0.01 0.68 0.05 - - -
23 OP 4 0.01 0.49 0.03 - - -
% to
Total
CY Availments % to
Total
Table XIII - Cumulative and Current Year Availments by IA (in billion)
IACumulative AvailmentsNo. of
Loans
17
DOF and DPWH availed most of the loan with percentage share of 32.86 and 14.25, respectively, of the total cumulative availments of P1.48 trillion (US$29.65 billion). During the year, DSWD had the highest at 39.85 percent of the total current year availments. The programs and projects for which loans were availed in CY 2017, implemented by various agencies are presented in Table XIV.
USD PHP USD PHP
24 BIR 1 0.01 0.33 0.03 - - -
GOCCs 129 6.74 336.73 22.73 0.06 3.05 4.34
1 DBP 24 1.40 70.10 4.73 - - -
2 PSALM 18 1.16 58.04 3.92 - - -
3 LBP 23 1.01 50.55 3.41 0.05 2.34 3.33
4 LRTA 7 0.74 37.01 2.50 - - -
5 NIA 13 0.53 26.30 1.78 0.01 0.65 0.92
6 BCDA 1 0.52 25.87 1.75 - - -
7 MWSS 6 0.25 12.62 0.85 0.00 0.06 0.08
8 PPA 4 0.25 12.49 0.84 - - -
9 NLRC 2 0.18 9.03 0.61 - - -
10 SBMA 5 0.17 8.67 0.59 - - -
11 LWUA 7 0.12 5.88 0.40 0.00 0.01 0.01
12 PNOC 2 0.09 4.68 0.32 - - -
13 PHIVIDEC 1 0.07 3.68 0.25 - - -
14 NPC 3 0.07 3.27 0.22 - - -
15 SBGFC 3 0.06 2.80 0.19 - - -
16 PNR 2 0.05 2.33 0.16 - - -
17 PFDA 1 0.02 1.25 0.08 - - -
18 NFA 3 0.02 0.99 0.07 - - -
19 PTA (TIEZA) 1 0.01 0.60 0.04 - - -
20 LLDA 2 0.01 0.34 0.02 - -
21 PEZA 1 0.00 0.24 0.02 - - -
LGUs 7 0.21 10.63 0.72 - - -
1 ARMM 6 0.19 9.27 0.63 - - -
2 PG-LDN 1 0.03 1.37 0.09 - - -
0.00 - less than five million
% to
Total
CY Availments % to
Total
(Table XIII continued)
IACumulative AvailmentsNo. of
Loans
USD PHP
1,405.30 70,205.95 100.00
1,344.28 67,157.77 95.66
560.04 27,978.51 39.85
1 3369-PHI 100.00 4,995.80
2 ADB2662
PHI
1.03 51.39
3 3100-PHI 100.40 5,015.71
4 8335-PH 138.61 6,924.84
5 8584-PH Social Welfare Development and Reform
Project 2
220.00 10,990.76
Table XIV - Programs and Projects for Implemention by Various IAs out of CY 2017 Availments
(in million)
IA/ Loan Account No./Project Name CreditorCY Availments
% to Total
Total
NGAs
DSWD
IBRD
Social Protection Support Project
ADB
KALAHI-CIDSS National Community-
Driven Development Project
18
USD PHP
250.00 12,489.50 17.79
1 3505-PHI Local Government Finance and Fiscal
Decentralization Reform Program -
Subprogram 2
ADB 250.00 12,489.50
181.33 9,058.71 12.90
1 PH-P261 Davao City Bypass Construction Project
(South and Center Sections)0.63 31.37
2JBIC PH-
P253
Flood Risk Management Project for
Cagayan River, Tagoloan River, and Imus
River
17.52 875.30
3 PH-P259 Flood Risk Management Project for CDO
River1.47 73.63
4 PH-P258 Metro Manila Interchange Construction
Phase VI0.40 19.75
5 PH-P260 Metro Manila Priority Bridges Seismic
Improvement Project0.61 30.42
6IBRD 7552
PH
National Roads Improvement and
Management Project 2IBRD 15.75 786.75
7 PHL-17 Integrated Disaster Risk Reduction and
Climate Change Adaptation Measures in
the Low Lying Areas of Pampanga Bay
0.32 16.11
8 PHL-18 Panguil Bay Bridge Project 0.63 31.43
9OPEC
1446P
Road Improvement and Institutional
Development ProjectOPEC 4.85 242.31
10JBIC PH-
P250
Arterial Road Bypass Project, Phase II9.20 459.56
11JBIC PH-
P249
Central luzon Link Expressway Project35.39 1,767.81
12JBIC PH-
P252
Pasig-Marikina River Channel
Improvement Project, Phase III
24.87 1,242.29
13 PH-P247 Road Upgrading and Preservation 60.95 3,045.11
14ADB2836-
PHI
Road Improvement and Institutional
DevelopmentADB 8.74 436.86
129.40 6,464.57 9.21
1 8344-PH Learning, Equity and Accountability
Program Support Project
IBRD 129.40 6,464.57
96.26 4,808.92 6.85
1 IBRD 8421-
PH
Phillippine Rural Development Project IBRD 89.86 4,489.37
2 200000177
3-PH
Scaling-Up the Second Cordillera
Highland Agricultural Resource
6.00 299.75
4 IFAD 749-
PH
Second Cordillera Highland Agricultural
Resource Mgnt. Project (CHARM2)
1.60 79.91
5 IFAD 767-
PH
Rapid Food Production Enhancement
Programme
(1.20) (60.11)
76.27 3,810.47 5.43
1 JBIC PH-
P228
New Communications, Navigations
Surveillance/Air Traffic Mgmt. (CNS/ATM)
System Development ProjectJICA
11.85 592.00
2 PH-P255 Capacity Enhancement of Mass Transit
Systems in Metro Manila Project
1.83 91.47
3 PH-P256 New Bohol Airport Construction and
Sustainable Environmet Protection Project
13.16 657.23
4 PH-P257 Maritime Safety Capability Improvement
Project for the Philippine Coast Guard
34.92 1,744.33
5 PHL-11-
EDCF
Puerto Princesa Airport Development
Project
KEXIM 14.52 725.44
23.10 1,154.06 1.64
1 ADB2465
PHI
Agrarian Reform Communities Project II ADB 7.80 389.62
(Table XIV, continued)
IA/ Loan Account No./Project Name CreditorCY Availments
% to Total
DA
DOTr
DAR
JICA
DILG
JICA
DepEd
DPWH
KEXIM
JICA
IFAD
19
3.3 Undrawn Commitments – P448.85 billion (US$8.98 billion)
Of the 459 ODA loans from 43 creditors, commitments for 96 loans from 19 creditors were not fully drawn with undrawn balances of P448.85 billion (US$8.98 billion) as of December 31, 2017.
3.3.1 By Creditor
The loans with biggest undrawn balances or unavailed commitments are loans from JICA under bilateral creditors which represent 45.37 percent of the total undrawn balances. The loans with undrawn balances are presented in Table XV.
USD PHP
2 JBIC PH-
P251
Mindanao Sustainable Agrarian and
Agriculture Development Project
JICA 13.86 692.57
3 OPEC
1225-P
Agrarian Reform Communities and
Projects II
OPEC 1.44 71.87
19.78 987.95 1.41
1 AG. No.
234.967
Capability Building Program, Phase II BAC 19.78 987.95
7.96 397.79 0.57
1JBIC PH-
P248
Forestland Management ProjectJICA
3.58 178.63
2ADB2311
PHI
Integrated Coastal Resources
Management Project
(0.02) (1.11)
3 2957-PHI 3.72 186.09
5 I-890-PH IFAD 0.68 34.17
0.15 7.30 0.01
1 PH-1258 Fisheries, Coastal Resources and
Livelihood ProjectIFAD 0.15 7.30
61.01 3,048.18 4.34
46.81 2,338.75 3.33
1 8162-PH Metro Manila Waste Water Management
Project
IBRD 46.30 2,312.89
2 JBIC PH-
P244 Agricultural Credit Support Project JICA 0.52 25.86
12.99 648.73 0.92
1IBRD 7709
PH
Participatory Irrigation Development
Project
IBRD 6.70 334.87
2JBIC PH-
P254
National Irrigation Sector Rehabilitation
and Improvement Project
JICA 6.28 313.86
1.11 55.46 0.08
1 3377-PHI Angat Water Transmission Improvement
Project
ADB 1.11 55.46
0.10 5.23 0.01
1 3389-PHI Water District Development Sector Project ADB 0.10 5.23
LWUA
(Table XIV, continued)
IA/ Loan Account No./Project Name CreditorCY Availments
% to Total
NIA
MWSS
DENR
BFAR
GOCCs
LBP
Integrated Natural Resources and
Environmental Management Project
ADB
BFP
USD PHPNo. of
LoansUSD PHP
% to
Total
Total 1,153.78 57,640.31 90 8,984.46 448,845.69 100.00
Bilateral 251.98 12,588.31 48 5,662.90 282,907.30 63.03
1 JICA 236.51 11,815.34 21 4,075.93 203,625.14 45.37
Table XV - Schedule of Loans with Undrawn Balances by Creditor (in million)
Creditor
Cumulative Availments Undrawn Balances
20
3.3.2 By Project Sector
The infrastructure sector with the highest cumulative net commitments has also the biggest undrawn balances of P297.23 billion (US$5.95 billion) representing 66.22 percent of the total undrawn balances of P448.85 billion (US$8.98 billion), as presented in Table XVI.
USD PHPNo. of
LoansUSD PHP
% to
Total
2 BNP PARIBAS - - 3 342.09 17,089.94 3.81
3 KEXIM 15.47 772.98 8 329.56 16,464.14 3.67
4 ECGD - - 3 226.41 11,310.81 2.52
5 AIIB - - 1 207.60 10,371.44 2.31
6 IBRD - - 1 207.60 10,371.44 2.31
7 AFD - - 2 178.39 8,911.99 1.99
8 Natixis (French Gov't) - - 1 34.40 1,718.60 0.38
9 KFW - - 3 30.21 1,509.03 0.34
10 Artigiancassa - - 1 23.64 1,180.85 0.26
11 EIB - - 1 6.59 329.00 0.07
12 SOCIETE GEN - - 1 0.50 24.85 0.01
13 FP - - 1 0.00 0.04 0.00
14 ICO - - 1 0.00 0.02 0.00
Multilateral 882.02 44,064.04 37 3,320.00 165,860.52 36.95
1 IBRD 646.62 32,304.05 12 1,694.44 84,650.83 18.86
2 ADB 221.88 11,084.78 15 1,525.43 76,207.53 16.98
3 IFAD 7.23 361.02 6 74.55 3,724.13 0.83
4 OPEC 6.29 314.18 3 22.27 1,112.64 0.25
5 EIB - - 1 3.31 165.39 0.04
Commercial 19.78 987.95 5 1.56 77.87 0.02
1 BAC 19.78 987.95 2 1.25 62.30 0.01
2 CEXIM - - 1 0.31 15.52 0.00
3 FP - - 1 0.00 0.03 0.00
4 ICO - - 1 0.00 0.02 0.00
Loans fully availed are not included in the list.
Difference between totals and sum of components is due to rounding off.
(Table XV, continued)
Creditor
Cumulative Availments Undrawn Balances
USD PHP USD PHPNo. of
LoansUSD PHP
1 Infra. 17,809.37 889,720.43 11,859.68 592,485.76 55 5,949.69 297,234.66 66.22
2 SRCD 10,720.87 535,593.36 9,034.13 451,327.06 14 1,686.74 84,266.31 18.77
3 ARRNR 4,269.05 213,273.34 3,419.98 170,855.46 22 849.07 42,417.88 9.45
Table XVI - Schedule of Undrawn Balances by Project Sector (in million)
Creditor
CNLC Cumulative Availments Undrawn Balances% to
Total
21
3.3.3 By Implementing Agency
DOTr has the highest undrawn balance which represent 37.56 percent of the total undrawn amount and 89.46 percent of the CNLC. There were no availments from loans intended for the construction/implementation of North-South Commuter Railway Project, Cebu Bus Rapid Transit Project and Maritime Safety Capability Improvement Project II with total CNLC of P116.26 billion (US$2.33 billion). This amount alone already represents 25.90 percent of the total undrawn amount. Along with DOTr are 13 other agencies with unavailed commitments ranging from 53.84 percent to 100.00 percent as of December 31, 2017, as shown in Table XVII.
3.4 Repayments – P562.64 billion (US$11.26 billion)
As of December 31, 2017, cumulative repayments to principal loans reached P562.64 billion (US$11.26 billion), which is equivalent to 37.98 percent of the total cumulative
USD PHP USD PHPNo. of
LoansUSD PHP
4 GID 4,413.68 220,498.70 3,914.95 195,582.84 2 498.74 24,915.85 5.55
5 ITT 1,425.73 71,226.84 1,425.51 71,215.86 3 0.22 10.98 0.00
Total 38,638.71 1,930,312.67 29,654.25 1,481,466.99 96 8,984.46 448,845.69 100.00
% to CNLC 100.00 76.75 23.25
Difference between totals and sum of components is due to rounding off.
(Table XVI, continued)
Creditor
CNLC Cumulative Availments Undrawn Balances% to
Total
USD PHP USD PHPNo. of
LoansUSD PHP
Total 13,130.22 655,959.37 4,145.76 207,113.68 91 8,984.46 448,845.69 100.00 68.43
NGAs 12,077.41 603,363.02 3,729.20 186,303.34 76 8,348.21 417,059.68 92.92 69.12
1 DOTr 3,771.70 188,426.46 397.45 19,855.75 14 3,374.25 168,570.71 37.56 89.46
2 DPWH 3,084.74 154,107.30 1,179.72 58,936.67 27 1,905.01 95,170.63 21.20 61.76
3 DSWD 1,701.10 84,983.75 1,008.98 50,406.67 4 692.12 34,577.08 7.70 40.69
4 DOF 500.00 24,979.00 2.50 124.90 1 497.50 24,854.11 5.54 99.50
5 DA 549.91 27,472.23 213.54 10,667.88 4 336.37 16,804.36 3.74 61.17
6 TESDA 307.00 15,337.11 6.24 311.60 2 300.76 15,025.50 3.35 97.97
7 BTr/SEC 300.00 14,987.40 - - 1 300.00 14,987.40 3.34 100.00
8 DAR 683.39 34,140.88 406.85 20,325.44 9 276.54 13,815.44 3.08 40.47
9 Deped 600.00 29,974.80 333.75 16,673.48 2 266.25 13,301.32 2.96 44.38
10 DENR 201.27 10,054.95 25.33 1,265.40 3 175.94 8,789.56 1.96 87.42
11 DILG 208.28 10,405.15 87.65 4,378.66 2 120.63 6,026.49 1.34 57.92
12 BFAR 67.34 3,364.28 4.82 240.74 2 62.52 3,123.54 0.70 92.84
13 DOE 40.24 2,010.37 1.57 78.64 2 38.67 1,931.73 0.43 96.09
14 BFP 49.44 2,469.88 48.20 2,408.13 2 1.24 61.75 0.01 2.50
15 DOH 13.00 649.45 12.60 629.38 1 0.40 20.07 0.00 3.09
1,052.81 52,596.35 416.56 20,810.34 15 636.25 31,786.01 7.08 60.43
1 NIA 429.35 21,449.32 166.97 8,341.59 4 262.37 13,107.73 2.92 61.11
2 LBP 351.47 17,558.54 162.25 8,105.76 4 189.21 9,452.78 2.11 53.84
3 MWSS 123.30 6,159.82 11.26 562.37 1 112.04 5,597.45 1.25 90.87
4 LWUA 72.30 3,612.13 6.41 320.08 2 65.90 3,292.04 0.73 91.14
5 DBP 54.32 2,713.62 47.59 2,377.68 2 6.72 335.94 0.07 12.38
6 NPC 22.08 1,102.92 22.08 1,102.85 2 0.00 0.07 0.00 0.01
Difference between totals and sum of components is due to rounding off.
GOCCs
Table XVII - Schedule of IAs with Undrawn Balances (in million)
Sector/ IA
Cumulative Availments Undrawn Balances% to
Total
% to
C N LC
CNLC
Loans fully availed are not included in the list.
22
availments of P1.48 trillion (US$29.65 billion). This is relatively higher by 1.55 percent compared to 2016 repayments in relation to availments of only 36.43 percent. Of this amount, P48.04 billion (US$0.96 billion) or 8.54 percent represent repayments during the year. Comparative figures in five years are presented in Chart VI.
Chart VI – Comparative Repayments in relation to Availments
3.4.1 By Creditor
The details of repayments by creditors are shown in Table XVIII.
USD PhP USD PhP
2017 29.65 1,481.47 11.26 562.64 37.98
2016 27.51 1,369.07 10.02 498.80 36.43
2015 26.12 1,230.59 9.06 426.77 34.68
2014 24.13 1,079.53 8.33 372.56 34.51
2013 23.29 1,034.02 7.60 337.23 32.61
Year
Cumulative
Availments
(in billion)
Cumulative
Repayments
(in billion)
% to
Cumulative
Availments
USD PHP USD PHP
Total Repayment 11,262.25 562,639.37 100.00 961.54 48,036.53 100.00
Bilateral 5,047.45 252,160.59 44.82 413.51 20,658.19 43.01
1 JICA 3,575.02 178,600.77 31.74 321.22 16,047.47 33.41
2 ECGD 535.59 26,756.92 4.76 3.12 155.94 0.32
3 BNP PARIBAS 198.20 9,901.65 1.76 37.88 1,892.40 3.94
4 KFW 144.64 7,225.73 1.28 5.54 276.69 0.58
5 USPL 134.05 6,697.08 1.19 10.66 532.73 1.11
6 ANZ/EFIC 95.36 4,764.08 0.85 - - -
7 EFIC 89.27 4,459.62 0.79 - - -
8 KEXIM 72.35 3,614.58 0.64 11.26 562.50 1.17
9 ICO 49.54 2,475.13 0.44 5.58 278.52 0.58
10 AFD 36.19 1,807.78 0.32 12.06 602.59 1.25
11 EIB 30.09 1,503.28 0.27 - - -
12 FP 19.13 955.55 0.17 1.78 88.74 0.18
13 KFAED 18.50 924.18 0.16 1.26 62.84 0.13
14 Fortis Bank 10.23 511.09 0.09 - - -
15 ITALY II 9.75 486.85 0.09 - - -
16 SOCIETE GEN 8.76 437.47 0.08 1.46 72.91 0.15
17 KBC 8.22 410.42 0.07 1.10 54.72 0.11
18 SFD 4.36 217.97 0.04 - - -
19 JFA 2.89 144.55 0.03 0.24 12.05 0.03
20 SIDA 2.23 111.43 0.02 - - -
21 LEONIA BANK 2.22 110.91 0.02 - - -
22 Belgian 0.87 43.58 0.01 0.36 18.07 0.04
Multilateral 5,071.07 253,340.64 45.03 500.30 24,994.07 52.03
1 ADB 3,382.92 169,004.02 30.04 317.70 15,871.46 33.04
2 IBRD 1,618.30 80,847.22 14.37 175.52 8,768.59 18.25
3 OPEC 24.32 1,215.10 0.22 3.66 182.72 0.38
4 EIB 23.19 1,158.50 0.21 - - -
Table XVIII - Cumulative and Current Year Repayments by Creditor (in million)
CreditorCumulative Repayments % to
Total
CY Repayments % to
Total
23
3.4.2 By Project Sector
Of the cumulative and current year repayments, 55.52 percent and 39.19 percent, respectively, were paid for the loans falling under the infrastructure sector accounts as presented in Table XIX.
3.4.3 By implementing Agency
The details on repayments by government sector and implementing agency showing that NGAs’ share represent 66.56 percent and 79.38 percent of the cumulative and current year repayments, respectively, are presented in Table XX.
USD PHP USD PHP
5 IFAD 20.33 1,015.85 0.18 3.16 157.98 0.33
6 NDF 2.00 99.94 0.02 0.27 13.33 0.03
Commercial 1,143.72 57,138.14 10.16 47.73 2,384.27 4.96
1 CEXIM 290.73 14,524.20 2.58 25.92 1,294.95 2.70
2 ECGD 142.97 7,142.68 1.27 - - -
3 EDC 122.18 6,103.82 1.08 - - -
4 BAC 119.50 5,969.87 1.06 13.20 659.30 1.37
5 BNP PARIBAS 105.47 5,269.11 0.94 0.54 27.05 0.06
6 CAMC 55.90 2,792.54 0.50 - - -
7 BBV 52.13 2,604.36 0.46 - - -
8 FP 34.83 1,740.06 0.31 1.27 63.38 0.13
9 Credit Com'l de
France
30.95 1,546.34 0.27 - - -
10 RZOA 27.43 1,370.28 0.24 3.81 190.27 0.40
11 Banco
Santander
25.75 1,286.61 0.24 - - 0.40
12 ANZ/EFIC 22.85 1,141.72 0.23 - - -
13 Bank of America 22.48 1,122.92 0.20 - - -
14 NIB 21.38 1,068.06 0.20 - - -
15 ING Bank 17.61 879.72 0.19 - - -
16 EFIC 14.08 703.30 0.16 - - -
17 SOCIETE GEN 12.54 626.23 0.12 - - -
18 ERSTE 8.22 410.55 0.11 1.83 91.23 0.19
19 Fortis Bank 7.99 399.38 0.00 0.80 40.18 0.08
20 SIDA 6.19 309.43 0.00 - - -
21 Bancaja 2.40 119.66 0.00 0.34 17.09 0.04
22 NDF 0.15 7.30 0.00 0.02 0.81 0.00
- Loans without repayments for the current year are either fully paid or still within the grace period.
(Table XVIII, continued)
CreditorCumulative Repayments % to
Total
CY Repayments % to
Total
USD PHP USD PHP
Total Repayments 11,262.25 562,639.37 100.00 961.54 48,036.53 100.00
1 Infra. 6,253.10 312,392.33 55.52 376.84 18,825.98 39.19
2 GID 1,806.85 90,266.83 16.04 214.37 10,709.58 22.29
3 AARNR 1,423.19 71,099.72 12.64 130.70 6,529.35 13.59
4 SRCD 1,066.83 53,296.45 9.47 160.01 7,993.54 16.64
5 ITT 712.28 35,584.04 6.32 79.63 3,978.09 8.28
Table XIX - Cumulative and Current Year Repayments by Project Sector (in million)
Project SectorCumulative Repayments % to
Total
CY Repayments % to
Total
24
USD PHP USD PHP
Total 11,262.25 562,639.37 100.00 961.54 48,036.53 100.00
NGAs 7,496.11 374,490.79 66.56 763.28 38,131.71 79.38
1 DOF 2,551.92 127,488.57 22.66 309.95 15,484.36 32.23
3 DPWH 1,931.46 96,491.72 17.15 150.92 7,539.50 15.70
4 DOTr 749.31 37,433.94 6.65 36.41 1,818.88 3.79
5 DAR 433.86 21,674.97 3.85 46.88 2,342.21 4.88
6 DepEd 392.35 19,600.82 3.48 56.69 2,832.12 5.90
7 DILG 280.99 14,037.82 2.49 9.75 487.14 1.01
8 DA 244.29 12,204.45 2.17 27.86 1,391.94 2.90
9 DOE 208.60 10,421.03 1.85 26.39 1,318.47 2.74
10 DOH 158.90 7,938.36 1.41 20.68 1,033.26 2.15
11 SC 118.24 5,907.28 1.05 24.27 1,212.54 2.52
12 DENR 103.13 5,152.24 0.92 12.34 616.64 1.28
13 BOC 75.90 3,792.04 0.67 12.31 614.95 1.28
14 DSWD 74.95 3,744.55 0.67 15.64 781.50 1.63
15 BFAR 59.52 2,973.31 0.53 2.40 120.04 0.25
16 PRRC 32.61 1,629.04 0.29 4.42 220.87 0.46
17 NAMRIA 25.75 1,286.61 0.23 - - 0.00
18 TESDA 23.87 1,192.73 0.21 3.47 173.38 0.36
19 PMMA 8.66 432.77 0.08 0.30 14.82 0.03
20 UP 8.60 429.54 0.08 0.33 16.52 0.03
21 OP 6.63 331.37 0.06 0.24 12.00 0.02
22 DOT 4.00 199.76 0.04 0.57 28.53 0.06
23 BIR 1.68 83.79 0.01 0.56 27.93 0.06
24 BFP 0.88 44.10 0.01 0.88 44.10 0.09
GOCCs 3,627.77 181,236.00 32.21 192.46 9,614.73 20.02
1 PSALM 1,161.74 58,038.19 10.32 - - 0.00
2 LBP 519.34 25,945.22 4.61 39.49 1,972.97 4.11
3 DBP 445.28 22,245.11 3.95 38.41 1,919.05 3.99
4 LRTA 330.94 16,533.34 2.94 31.72 1,584.58 3.30
5 NIA 197.87 9,885.31 1.76 22.08 1,103.26 2.30
6 NLRC 180.79 9,032.15 1.61 - - 0.00
7 PPA 178.27 8,906.01 1.58 6.29 314.08 0.65
8 MWSS 119.72 5,981.04 1.06 14.85 741.69 1.54
9 BCDA 110.37 5,514.01 0.98 16.98 848.30 1.77
10 PNOC 93.63 4,677.47 0.83 - - 0.00
11 SBMA 64.95 3,244.97 0.58 6.14 306.66 0.64
12 LWUA 64.88 3,241.12 0.58 5.08 253.63 0.53
13 NPC 51.43 2,569.33 0.46 1.08 53.71 0.11
14 PFDA 24.99 1,248.20 0.22 - - 0.00
15 PHIVIDEC 19.31 964.79 0.17 2.41 120.59 0.25
16 NFA 17.89 893.83 0.16 0.55 27.65 0.06
17 SBGFC 17.27 862.87 0.15 3.09 154.30 0.32
18 PNR 17.03 850.59 0.15 3.11 155.30 0.32
19 PTA (TIEZA) 7.34 366.48 0.07 0.59 29.32 0.06
20 PEZA 2.56 127.72 0.02 0.23 11.61 0.02
21 LLDA 2.17 108.26 0.02 0.36 18.04 0.04
LGUs 138.37 6,912.58 1.23 5.81 290.09 0.60
1 ARMM 126.11 6,300.04 1.12 4.60 229.84 0.48
2 PG-LDN 12.26 612.54 0.11 1.21 60.25 0.13
Table XX - Cumulative and Current Year Repayments by IA (in million)
IACummulative Repayments % to
Total
CY Repayments % to
Total
25
3.5 Debt Service Expenditures for CY 2017 – P66.97 billion
Total debt service for the year amounted to P66.97 billion which is relatively higher by P5.85 billion or 9.57 percent when compared to debt service expenditures in 2016. Of the total payments, P 48.48 billion represents payment to principal which accounts to 72.39 percent of the total debt service expenditure for 2017. The remaining balance, which accounts to 27.61 percent represents payment for interest, commitment fee, guaranty fee and other charges as presented in Chart VII.
Chart VII - Debt Service Expenditures (in billion PhP)
3.5.1 By Creditor
Of the total debt service expenditures, P36.65 billion, equivalent to 54.73 percent represent payments to multilateral creditors with the biggest payments made to ADB in the amount of P21.52 billion representing 32.13 percent of the total debt service as presented in Table XXI.
GRAND TOTAL 66,972.32 100.00 48,482.76 16,203.50 230.17 644.21 1,411.69
Bilateral 26,829.55 40.06 20,397.97 4,893.28 111.56 462.39 964.34
1 JICA 20,447.92 30.53 15,319.85 3,870.89 89.96 446.64 720.57
2 BNP PARIBAS 2,186.34 3.26 1,799.96 264.61 - - 121.78
3 USPL 1,632.23 2.44 1,238.17 389.10 - - 4.96
4 KEXIM 702.97 1.05 546.24 137.81 - - 18.92
5 AFD 674.49 1.01 520.83 78.62 18.69 - 56.36
6 KFW 369.77 0.55 287.30 60.65 2.91 15.75 3.17
7 ICO 312.37 0.47 264.98 36.22 - - 11.17
8 ECGD 170.88 0.26 148.32 15.96 - - 6.60
9 FP 117.52 0.18 78.46 31.32 - - 7.74
10 SOCIETE GEN 66.82 0.10 59.89 0.30 - - 6.63
11 KFAED 64.32 0.10 59.60 3.91 - - 0.81
12 KBC 52.01 0.08 47.30 - - - 4.71
13 JFA 15.71 0.02 11.46 3.34 - - 0.92
14 Belgian 15.62 0.02 15.62 - - - -
15 Artigiancassa 0.56 0.00 - 0.56 - - 0.00
Commercial 3,490.89 5.21 2,521.84 772.40 6.07 50.12 140.47
1 CEXIM 1,735.74 2.59 1,257.47 396.90 - 49.24 32.12
2 BAC 808.98 1.21 569.85 160.99 1.60 - 76.54
Other
Charges
Table XXI - Debt Service Expenditures by Creditor
Particulars
Amount (in million PHP)
Total % to
TotalPrincipal Interest
Commit-
ment Fee
Guaranty
Fee
% of Increase
9.57
26
3.5.2 By Implementing Agency
The BTr payments for loans directly used by the NGAs and those relent to GOCCs amounted to P56.67 billion of which P40.98 billion or 72.31 percent represents payment to principal while P15.69 billion or 27.68 percent represent payments for interest, commitment fees and other charges. On the other hand, GOCCs payments direct to their creditors for loans guaranteed by the NG amounted to P10.31 billion as presented in Table XXII.
3 FP 538.45 0.80 392.19 138.92 4.47 0.89 1.99
4 RZOA 228.12 0.34 164.46 47.09 - - 16.57
5 ERSTE 111.88 0.17 78.85 24.85 - - 8.17
6 Fortis Bank 37.02 0.06 34.73 0.94 - - 1.35
7 BNP PARIBAS 26.88 0.04 23.38 - - - 3.49
8 ICO 2.69 0.00 - 2.69 - - 0.00
9 NDF 1.14 0.00 0.92 - - - 0.23
Multilateral 36,651.88 54.73 25,562.95 10,537.82 112.54 131.70 306.87
1 ADB 21,519.27 32.13 16,315.20 4,915.12 67.81 21.73 199.42
2 IBRD 14,589.68 21.78 8,812.45 5,534.09 44.73 109.97 88.44
3 IFAD 280.48 0.42 240.46 24.72 - - 15.30
4 OPEC 245.53 0.37 182.03 61.99 0.00 - 1.51
5 NDF 16.93 0.03 12.82 1.90 - - 2.21
Other
Charges
0.00 - less than five thousand
(Table XXI, continued)
Particulars
Amount (in million PHP)
Total % to
TotalPrincipal Interest
Commit-
ment Fee
Guaranty
Fee
Difference between totals and sum of components is due to rounding off.
GRAND TOTAL 66,972.32 100.00 48,482.76 16,203.50 230.17 644.21 1,411.69
56,666.67 84.612 40,976.65 14,097.51 194.98 - 1,397.52
100.00 72.31
NG-Direct 55,073.16 82.23 39,563.54 13,982.44 194.98 - 1,332.20
1 DOF 22,556.73 33.68 15,865.14 6,369.67 - 321.92
2 DPWH 9,341.31 13.95 7,059.91 1,843.92 27.65 409.83
3 DepEd 3,858.18 5.76 2,805.61 998.82 9.78 43.96
4 DAR 2,892.16 4.32 2,233.94 537.56 5.45 115.21
5 DSWD 2,508.01 3.74 778.54 1,644.18 72.54 12.75
6 DOTr 2,467.47 3.68 1,857.15 453.13 29.58 127.62
7 DA 1,832.84 2.74 1,471.98 345.33 - 15.52
8 NIA 1,490.83 2.23 1,070.71 374.23 2.26 43.64
9 DOE 1,476.97 2.21 1,255.32 150.06 4.78 66.82
10 SC 1,390.31 2.08 1,207.96 176.90 - 5.46
11 DOH 1,290.33 1.93 1,040.20 213.31 2.20 34.61
12 DENR 766.33 1.14 612.59 133.77 10.88 9.09
13 BOC 719.32 1.07 572.78 119.43 - 27.12
14 DILG 678.95 1.01 424.47 197.80 9.27 47.41
15 NPC 551.12 0.82 383.95 160.71 4.47 1.99
16 ARMM 318.16 0.48 227.13 86.29 - 4.74
17 PRRC 257.13 0.38 212.82 37.33 - 6.98
18 TESDA 211.59 0.32 158.65 41.27 - 11.68
Table XXII - Debt Service Expenditures by Implementing Agencies
Particulars
Amount (in million PHP)
Total % to
TotalPrincipal Interest
Commit-
ment Fee
Guaranty
Fee
Other
Charges
Paid by BTr
% to Total 27.69
27
3.5.3 By Project Sector
Of the total debt service expenditures for the year, 36.42 percent were payments for loans availed by the Infrastructure sector, as presented in Table XXIII.
19 BFAR 135.17 0.20 116.71 14.15 - - 4.32
20 PG-LDN 76.05 0.11 57.31 14.92 - 3.81
21 BIR 63.34 0.09 27.82 35.12 - 0.40
22 BFP 57.97 0.09 38.12 6.14 1.60 12.11
23 DOT 34.21 0.05 27.14 5.26 - 1.81
24 OCD 26.29 0.04 - 11.75 14.54 0.00
25 LLDA 25.29 0.04 17.98 7.07 - 0.25
26 UP 17.52 0.03 16.46 0.80 - 0.27
27 PMMA 17.17 0.03 12.81 2.74 - 1.62
28 OP 12.41 0.02 10.37 0.77 - 1.27
NG-Relent 1,593.51 2.38 1,413.11 115.07 - - 65.33
1 LRTA 1,213.07 1.81 1,061.49 96.64 - - 54.93
2 LBP 201.39 0.30 188.17 8.99 - - 4.23
3 PHIVIDEC 119.36 0.18 114.70 - - 4.66
4 SBGFC 34.45 0.05 27.97 6.02 - - 0.47
5 NFA 15.71 0.02 11.46 3.34 - - 0.92
6 MWSS 9.53 0.01 9.32 0.08 - - 0.13
10,305.65 15.388 7,506.11 2,105.99 35.18 644.21 14.16
NG-Guaranteed 10,305.65 15.39 7,506.11 2,105.99 35.18 644.21 14.16
1 LBP 2,483.61 3.71 1,890.84 359.15 0.53 230.64 2.45
2 DBP 2,232.79 3.33 1,662.37 564.94 5.26 - 0.23
3 BCDA 1,271.49 1.90 860.35 199.80 - 209.74 1.59
4 MWSS 1,061.99 1.59 741.23 252.33 - 66.31 2.12
5 NFA 1,048.28 1.57 723.00 323.18 - - 2.10
6 LRTA 621.36 0.93 469.14 109.70 - 42.52 0.00
7 PPA 418.64 0.63 300.02 81.25 - 37.37 0.00
8 SBMA 418.29 0.62 308.08 55.34 - 54.86 -
9 LWUA 301.93 0.45 245.22 56.00 0.71 - 0.00
10 PNR 205.70 0.31 153.19 46.85 - - 5.67
11 PEZA 201.88 0.30 122.15 51.04 28.69 - -
12 PTA
(TIEZA)
39.70 0.06 30.53 6.41 - 2.76
(Table XXII, continued)
Particulars
Amount (in million PHP)
Total % to
TotalPrincipal Interest
Commit-
ment Fee
Guaranty
Fee
Other
Charges
Paid by GOCCs
0.00 - less than five thousand
Difference between totals and sum of components is due to rounding off.
1 Infra. 24,389.74 36.42 18,493.26 4,466.42 72.75 562.16 795.15
2 SRCD 14,988.98 22.38 7,948.84 6,775.75 108.33 - 156.07
3 GID 13,716.33 20.48 11,074.12 2,372.47 1.60 - 268.14
4 AARNR 9,593.33 14.32 7,292.11 2,070.64 47.27 21.55 161.75
5 ITT 4,283.94 6.40 3,674.43 518.23 0.22 60.51 30.56
Total 66,972.32 100.00 48,482.76 16,203.50 230.17 644.21 1,411.69
72.39 24.19 0.34 0.96 2.11% to Total
Difference between totals and sum of components is due to rounding off.
Table XXIII - Debt Service Expenditures by Project Sector
Particulars
Amount (in million PHP)
Total % to
TotalPrincipal Interest
Commit-
ment Fee
Guaranty
Fee
Other
Charges
28
3.6 Outstanding Balance – P918.83 billion (US$18.39 billion)
As of December 31, 2017, ODA loans have outstanding balance of P918.83 billion (US$18.39 billion) which increased by P48.56 billion (US$0.91 billion) compared with last year’s balance of P870.27 billion (US$17.49 billion). The increase was due to adjustments, revaluation of foreign currency and availments and repayments during the year. The details are shown in Table XXIV.
3.6.1 By Type of Creditor
As to type of creditor, balances from Multilateral creditors represents 58 percent of the total balances. The outstanding balances to lenders by type of creditors are presented in Chart VIII.
Chart VIII – Outstanding Balances by Creditor Type (in billion PhP)
The specific creditors by type are presented in Table XXV.
US$ PHP
17.49 870.27 94.72
Adjustments 0.03 1.40 0.15
Forex Revaluation 0.43 24.99 2.72
CY Availments and Repayments 0.44 22.17 2.41
18.39 918.83 100.00
0.91 48.56 5.58
Balance as of December 31, 2017
Increase
Table XXIV - Changes on Loan Outstanding Balance
Particulars Amount (in billion) % to
Total
Balance as of December 31, 2016
Add/(deduct):
PhP531.08 (58%)
PhP364.84 (40%)
PhP22.90 (2%)
Multilateral Bilateral Commercial
US$ PHP
1 Multilateral 10.63 531.08 0.58
2 Bilateral 7.30 364.84 0.40
3 Commercial 0.46 22.90 0.02
18.39 918.83 100.00 Total
Creditor Type
Outstanding
Balances % to
Total
US$ PHP
18,392.00 918,827.62 100.00
7,302.99 364,842.77 39.71
1 JICA 6,201.82 309,830.42 33.72
2 AFD 341.68 17,069.65 1.86
3 KEXIM 212.48 10,614.97 1.16
4 BNP PARIBAS 180.60 9,022.39 0.98
5 KFW 135.06 6,747.08 0.73
6 USPL 100.07 4,999.46 0.54
7 ICO 67.80 3,387.02 0.37
8 FP 24.98 1,248.19 0.14
9 ECGD 9.36 467.81 0.05
Total
Bilateral
Table XXV - Outstanding Balances by Specific Creditor (in million)
Creditor Amount
% to Total
29
3.6.2 By Project Sector
The Project Sector with the highest outstanding balances is the Social Reform and Community Development (SRCD) sector while the Industry, Trade and Tourism (ITT) sector has the lowest outstanding balances as graphically presented in Chart IX.
Chart IX – Number of Loans and Outstanding Balances by Sector
US$ PHP
10 Artigiancassa 7.95 397.34 0.04
11 Belgian 6.69 333.97 0.04
12 SOCIETE GEN 5.84 291.65 0.03
13 KBC 5.48 273.61 0.03
14 JFA 1.93 96.37 0.01
15 KFAED 1.26 62.84 0.01
Multilateral 10,630.61 531,084.10 57.80
1 ADB 5,439.40 271,741.58 29.57
2 IBRD 5,048.26 252,201.06 27.45
3 IFAD 97.57 4,874.51 0.53
4 OPEC 34.04 1,700.62 0.19
5 NDF 11.34 566.34
Commercial 458.40 22,900.75 2.49
1 CEXIM 278.88 13,932.24 1.52
2 BAC 115.32 5,761.37 0.63
3 RZOA 19.67 982.81 0.11
4 ICO 18.95 946.55 0.10
5 ERSTE 13.70 684.25 0.07
6 Bancaja 4.62 230.76 0.03
7 BNP PARIBAS 3.52 175.84 0.02
8 FP 3.08 153.65 0.02
9 NDF 0.67 33.27 0.00
Difference between totals and sum of components is due to rounding off.
(Table XXIV, continued)
Creditor Amount
% to Total
30
(Chart IX, continued)
Difference between the totals and the sum of the components is due to rounding off.
The first five loans under each project sector with big outstanding balances are presented in Table XXVI.
2016 2017 2016 2017
AARNR 78 76 96.59 99.76
GID 19 20 112.50 105.32
ITT 18 18 37.84 35.63
Infra. 148 150 269.07 280.09
SRCD 65 66 354.27 398.03
Total 328 330 870.27 918.83
Project SectorNo. of loans Outstanding Balance (in billion PhP)
US$ PHP
18,392.00 918,827.62 100.00
5,606.58 280,093.43 30.48
1 PH-P226 Subic-Clark-Tarlac Expressw ay
ProjectBCDA JBIC 407.52 20,359.12 2.22
2 PH-P243 Environmental Development Project DBP JBIC 221.05 11,043.01 1.20
3 2282 PHI Pow er Sector Development
Program ClusterDOF ADB 210.74 10,527.90 1.15
4 PH-P247 Toad Upgrading and Preservation JBIC 200.64 10,023.67 1.09
5 7552 PH National Roads Improvement and
Management Project 2IBRD 186.44 9,314.04 1.01
2,108.09 105,316.01 11.46
1 2840-PHI Governance in Justice Sector
Reform Program- Subprogram 2DOF ADB 254.15 12,696.65 1.38
2 7913-PH
Food Crisis Response Development
Policy Operation: Supplemental
Support for Post-typhoon Recovery
DepEd IBRD 250.00 12,489.50 1.36
3 2489 PHI Governance in Justice Sector
Reform ProgramSC ADB 192.70 9,626.82 1.05
4 2450 PHI Development Policy Support
Program Cluster-Sub Program 2DOF ADB 189.59 9,471.57 1.03
5 7424 PH First Development Policy Loan
ProgramDOF IBRD 187.45 9,364.63 1.02
1,996.79 99,755.74 10.86
1 PH-CL 020MM Air Quality Improvement Sector
Development ProgramJBIC 227.94 11,387.54 1.24
2 7615 PH Food Crisis Response Development
Policy200.00 9,991.60 1.09
3 8421-PH Phillippine Rural Development
ProjectDA 171.74 8,579.76 0.93
4 PH-P199 Environmental Infrastructure
Support Credit Program, Phase IIDBP 131.91 6,589.82 0.72
5 PH-P242 Agrarian Reform Infrastructure
Support Project, Phase IIIDAR 101.46 5,068.87 0.55
7,967.30 398,030.61 43.32
1 3080-PHI
Emergency Assistance for Relief
and Recovery from Typhoon
Yolanda
DOF ADB 500.00 24,979.00 2.72
Social Reform & Community Development
DOF
IBRD
JBIC
Total Outstanding Balance
Infrastructure
Governance and Institution Development
Agriculture, Agrarian Reform and Natural Resources
Table XXVI - Five Loans under each Project Sector with big Outstanding Balances (in million)
Loan Account
No.Name of Project IA Creditor
Amount % to
Total
DPWH
31
3.6.3 By Government Sector
The loan balances by government sector with the NGAs having the highest outstanding balance representing 82.67 percent of the total loan balances are shown in Table XXVII.
3.6.4 By Implementing Agency
Table XXVIII shows the loan balances by implementing agency with the DOF and DPWH having the highest outstanding balances representing 39.10 percent and 12.48 percent of total loan balances.
US$ PHP
2 8085-PH Disaster Risk Management and
DevelopmentDOF 500.00 24,979.00 2.72
3 8328-PH
Second Development Policy Loan to
Foster Inclusive Grow th:
Supplemental Financing for Post-
Typhoon Recovery and Amendment
to the Original Loan Agreement
DOF 500.00 24,979.00 2.72
4 PH-SB1 Post Disaster Stand- by Loan DOF JBIC 445.40 22,251.29 2.42
5 7805-PH Social Welfare and Development
Reform ProjectDSWD IBRD 405.00 20,232.99 2.20
713.24 35,631.82 3.88
1 PH-P198 Industrial Support Services
Expansion Program, Phase IIDBP JBIC 226.56 11,318.60 1.23
2 2278 PHI Financial Market Regulation &
Intermediation Program ClusterDOF ADB 93.66 4,679.07 0.51
3 PH-P189 Domestic Shipping Modernization
Program, Phase IIDBP JBIC 93.21 4,656.36 0.51
4 2199 PHI Microfinance Development Program DOF ADB 61.10 3,052.18 0.33
5 4833 PH Support for Strategic Local
Development & Investment ProjectLBP IBRD 43.56 2,176.41 0.24
(Table XXVI, continued)
Loan Account
No.Name of Project IA Creditor
Amount % to
Total
Industry, Trade and Tourism
IBRD
NG Direct NG- RelentNG
GuaranteedTotal US$ PHP
16 9 50 75 3,112.58 155,498.11 16.92
5 5 74.49 3,721.52 0.41
250 250 15,204.93 759,607.99 82.67
271 9 50 330 18,392.00 918,827.62 100.00
PhP 780,673.35 21,138.52 117,015.74 918,827.62
US$ 15,626.59 423.13 2,342.28 18,392.00
Difference between the totals and the sum of the components is due to rounding off.
Table XXVII - Outstanding Balances by Government Sector
Implementing
Agency
Amount
(in million) % to
Total
GOCCs
LGUs
NGAs
Total
Amount
(in million)
No. of Loans
32
US$ PHP
330 18,392.00 918,827.62 100.00
250 15,204.93 759,607.99 82.67
1 DOF 37 7,191.84 359,290.11 39.10
2 DPWH 69 2,294.46 114,626.51 12.48
3 DSWD 9 1,993.75 99,603.53 10.84
4 DepEd 12 886.86 44,305.96 4.82
5 DOTr 25 603.37 30,143.06 3.28
6 DAR 18 512.15 25,585.97 2.78
7 DA 22 443.95 22,178.88 2.41
8 DILG 7 309.95 15,484.57 1.69
9 SC 2 202.37 10,109.76 1.10
10 DOH 12 153.11 7,649.29 0.83
11 DOE 3 127.52 6,370.53 0.69
12 DENR 11 116.38 5,814.07 0.63
13 BOC 2 108.73 5,432.17 0.59
14 OCD 1 60.31 3,012.97 0.33
15 BFP 2 47.32 2,364.02 0.26
16 PRRC 2 44.08 2,202.34 0.24
17 TESDA 5 38.78 1,937.51 0.21
18 BFAR 5 36.10 1,803.63 0.20
19 DOT 1 13.42 670.55 0.07
20 PMMA 1 7.28 363.48 0.04
21 BIR 1 5.03 251.10 0.03
22 UP 1 4.96 247.81 0.03
23 OP 2 3.21 160.17 0.02
GOCCs 75 3,112.58 155,498.11 16.92
1 DBP 17 957.98 47,858.52 5.21
2 LBP 13 492.57 24,607.67 2.68
3 LRTA 6 409.79 20,472.42 2.23
4 BCDA 1 407.52 20,359.12 2.22
5 NIA 12 328.59 16,415.77 1.79
6 MWSS 3 132.86 6,637.62 0.72
7 SBMA 2 108.56 5,423.37 0.59
8 PPA 2 71.81 3,587.45 0.39
9 PHIVIDEC 1 54.31 2,713.34 0.30
10 LWUA 6 52.84 2,639.57 0.29
11 SBGFC 3 38.69 1,932.64 0.21
12 PNR 2 29.65 1,481.37 0.16
13 NPC 2 13.94 696.46 0.08
14 PTA (TIEZA) 1 4.69 234.53 0.03
15 LLDA 2 4.64 231.62 0.03
16 PEZA 1 2.21 110.27 0.01
17 NFA 1 1.93 96.37 0.01
LGUs 5 74.49 3,721.52 0.41
1 ARMM 4 59.42 2,968.59 0.32
2 PG-LDN 1 15.07 752.93 0.08
Table XXVIII - Outstanding Balances by IA (in million)
Total Oustanding Balance
NGAs
No. of
Loans Creditor % to Total
Outstanding Balances
Difference between the totals and the sum of the components is due to rounding off.
4.0 AUDIT OBSERVATIONS
AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
33
4.0 AUDIT OBSERVATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
4.1 Consolidated Audit Observations and Recommendations
Audit Observations Recommendations
A. Project Sustainability
Sustainability of completed projects was not assured. Existing conditions of at least 17 projects with loan availments of P23.31 billion and existing loan balances of P13.98 billion would manifest inability of the implementing agencies/recipients to sustain the gain from the projects.
Based on the records provided by the BTr, 459 loan agreements were entered into from 1995 to 2017, of which 392 loans were closed from 1996 to 2017. The closed/ terminated loans were used to implement 63 programs and 288 projects, of which, only 275 were declared completed. Of the 392 loans, 284 have remaining loan balances ranging from P4.28 million to P24.98 billion.
The concerned Auditors tried to determine from the monitoring reports or any available documents of the implementing agencies (IAs), the status/condition of these projects to establish whether the concerned IAs/recipients were able to sustain the projects established upon completion. Evaluation of documents submitted by the concerned Agency officials disclosed that of the 275 completed projects as of December 31, 2017, only the status of 105 projects were so far established as reflected in Table XXIX.
The status/condition of 170 projects cannot be established due to, among others, the following:
a) Inavailability of records and information considering that
employees who implemented the projects were no longer connected with the IA or recipient agency.
Management to require concerned officials to: a) Assess LIGs since more than
one-year business cycle has elapsed instead of just waiting for the completion payment of the Livelihood Assistance Fund (LAF); Issue termination notice to the LIGs as provided in the MOA in case of business operation failure; and retrieve the funds from Community Financial Institution (CFI) for terminated LIGs. (DA/ SCHARMP)
b) LGUs and other beneficiary associations, to include in their budget, funds for the maintenance of the transferred projects; and establish the obligations of each party in the MOA to sustain the projects. (various projects)
c) Implementing Agencies to include sustainability plan in the general plan of the project; to closely monitor the utilization of projects transferred to the recipient LGUs/associations; and to require them to submit Status Report showing the condition of the transferred project as well as problems, issues and concerns in the utilization of the turned-over project and act accordingly to sustain the project. (various projects)
d) Implementing agencies to
assess the capability of the recipient agency to sustain
AvailmentsOutstanding
Balance
88 216,201.20 99,068.41
10 19,483.60 12,188.64
7 3,828.66 1,793.55
170 411,016.80 182,212.67
275 650,530.26 295,263.27
Table XXIX - Operational Status of Completed Projects
Amount
(in million PHP)No. of
PojectsStatus
Operational
Partially Operational
Not Operational
No Status Reported
Total
34
Audit Observations Recommendations
b) Absence of monitoring by the IA of the status of completed projects.
As reported by the concerned Audit Teams, the status/condition of projects which were not sustained or fully sustained follows:
IA Project Amount
(Million P) Loan
Balances
Remarks
DA
SCHARMP
2.422 1,130.56 Various Livelihood Interest Groups (LIGs) have outstanding balances beyond the one-year business cycle due to poor business management, contrary to the MOA signed by the parties.
CHARMP Not Indicated
240.16 Out of 84 projects inspected, only 37 were maintained by the Local Government Units (LGUs) and 23 others rehabilitated; Seven other projects were damaged while 17 others were partly damaged. (DA CAR)
Most beneficiary POs who were expected to care, maintain and support the established plantation were already desolved. (DA/CAR)
DFIMDP 3.320 673.78 Of the 13 food terminals established in the different barangays in the Provinces of Cavite, Rizal and Laguna, out of funds transferred by DA to the LGUs and barangays as of December 31, 2009, only two remains operational. (DA RFO IV-A)
NPC PRES
0 696.46 Mini Grid System Component - Notwithstanding the high production cost and low collection efficiency from customers, NPC maintained the operation of 128 out of the 154 installed generator sets with the support from the MESP. The Solar Photovoltaic (PV) Systems - Out of the total 5,129 solar panel units installed, only owners of 307 units were able to replace battery to make them operational, 4,102 units are with discharged batteries; 5 units were reported accidentally burned; 4 units were reported stolen, and 801 units were reported defective. There were no reported collections from the Solar Home Systems (SHS) for CY 2017.
DOE PEEP 75.335 1,129.59
DOE failed to operationalize the Lamp Waste Management Facility (LWMF), one of the components of the project.
LRTA AFC 83.11 Replaced by new Automatic Fare Collection System or Beep Cards.
DILG ENP 843.17 Of the 16 units of ENP equipment, only one was operational with limited functions. It can only serve calls but unable to do recording. All other units were not serviceable due to obsolescence, gutted by fire or damaged by typhoon.
the project, otherwise transfer the project to an LGU committed to comply with the requirements, and worthy to be a project beneficiary. (various projects)
e) NPC to reassess the requirements and prospects of bringing power generation and the associated power delivery systems to commercial viability and lower production costs by coordinating with Masbate Electric Cooperative (MASELCO) for a possible Qualified Third Party (QTP) take over thru the Missionary Electrification Subsidy Program (MESP); Devise more efficient collection strategies/mechanism to improve collection efficiency of power receivables; Conduct physical inventory taking of defective SHS and prepare an assessment report on whether the continuance of the SHS component of the project would yield a more advantageous result; and Address the identified operational and mobilization issues. (NPC/PRES)
f) Negotiate with the identified LGUs/private organizations to operate the LWMF in order to serve its purpose; Provide the Audit Team with the updates/information on the results of the negotiation with the LGUs or other government and private organizations; and Provide justification as to why this transaction may not be disallowed in audit. (DOE/PEEP)
35
Audit Observations Recommendations
IA Project Amount
(Million P) Loan
Balances Remarks
DOTr GMDSSP 157.93 Abandoned by the contractor in CY 2000 due to non-payment of advance payment for variation order and extra management cost.
MSIP-3 461.53 No information in CY2017 report. Based on CY 2008 CAAR, project equipment were unserviceable/unutilized.
UP- PGH
UME- DEMS
247.81 In CY 2016, equipment costing 243.31 million were declared unserviceable due to wear and tear per Report of the Property and Supply Division.
DILG CAMDP 32.89 In CY 2016, the Buldozer, dump truck and five equipment under Solid Waste Management were reported unserviceable.
RWSSSP- 5
135.80 In CY 2016, some units were reported unserviceable due to: a. No water source; b. Not potable for daily use; c. With traces of lead; and d. Parts or facility are heavily damaged
which become irrepairable.
MBUSSP 6.38 788.50 Of the 39 subprojects, only status of 28 projects were reported, of which 27 are still serviceable. Lugait equipment with projects cost of P6.38 million was reported unserviceable.
PRRC PREMRP 1,928.72 Of the 59 components, 16 were not operational
BOC NICIS 5,432.17 One unit located at Port of Davao with pending case (BOC vs. Acquarius Container Yard), with status quo order from the court.
B. Project Implementation and Management
1. Completion of 17 projects within the loan period is
unlikely considering the reported project status. The benefits then to be derived therefrom will be delayed in addition to payments of commitment fees. Based on BTr report, out of the total debt service for CY 2017 alone, P230.17 million represents payment of commitment fees for delayed withdrawal/availment of loans.
Considering the status of implementation of 17 projects as reported by the concerned Auditor Teams, the timely completion of these projects is unlikely. The projects affected and their conditions follow:
IA Project Amount
(Million P) Remarks
DA PRDP Not Indicated
The project’s overall physical progress of 59 percent is not commensurate
Management to require concerned officials to: a) Formulate realistic and
attainable work plan and budget by: i) Preparing Monthly Disbursement Program (MDP) and ensuring that it matched with the budgetary and disbursement requirements; ii) Ensuring that programs, projects and activities are ready for implementation upon the release of allocated funds; and iii) Installing budget performance tracking and
36
Audit Observations Recommendations
IA Project Amount
(Million P) Remarks
DA PRDP with the actual disbursement status of 32 percent as of December 31, 2017 indicating very low fund utilization for the past three years of project implementation.
4,747.00 Out of P4.747 billion allotment received for CY 2017, only 15 percent or P716.861 million has been disbursed as of December 31, 2017. Unobligated balance of FY 2017 GAA amounted to P546.066 million or 26 percent.
316.832 Cash allocation of P316.832 million or 39 percent of the total allocation of P818.721 million received by NPCO, PSO Luzon B and RPCO IVB in CY 2017 was not utilized.
19,869.00 Of the 389 total subprojects in CYs 2014-2021 under the I-Build Project Component with aggregate project cost of P19.869 billion, 152 subprojects costing P6.637 billion were targeted for completion as of December 31, 2017. Of the targeted projects, only 67 subprojects costing P1.929 billion were completed leaving 85 subprojects costing P4.708 billion either ongoing, for implementation or cancelled/ terminated. Forty five of the uncompleted subprojects costing P1.653 billion are already beyond target date of completion.
1,899.00 Proposals for I-REAP subprojects remained low in the span of three years generating only 599 subproject proposals costing P1.899 billion or 47 percent out of the total cost allocation of P4.003 billion targeted to be implemented over the six-year project duration. Moreover, the required midterm assessment report was not yet submitted due to the delayed engagement of the third-party expert. Also, the 599 subproject proposals cover only 73 PLGUs out of the 81 PLGUs nationwide.
306.832 Of the 566 total subprojects to be implemented for CYs 2016-2019 under the I-REAP Project Component
similar system to monitor utilization of allotments to prevent lapsing of cash allocations and loan drawdowns. (DA/PRDP; DOTr/CEMTSMMP)
b) Fast track disbursement process to settle possible due and demandable obligations to fully utilize available NCA balances. (DA/PRDP)
c) Review operations to determine bottlenecks and/or reasons for low utilization of funds and act accordingly; Fast track resolution of issues, implementation of planned programs, projects and activities to avoid lapsing of cash allocation; Submit a catch up plan for the NCA received; and Accomplish MRDs or FAR No. 4 properly and completely in compliance with Appendix 23, GAM, Volume II. (DOTR/PPADP, NBAC-SEPP, New CNS/ATM, CEMTS-MMP, MSCIP Phase I, MSCIP, Phase II Cebu BRT & PCGCDP; DA/PRDP)
d) Provide COA with the list of WFP not obligated, reasons for non-obligation, documentary requirements of subprojects with extended contract time to evaluate validity thereof pursuant to the provisions of RA 9184 IRR, status of cancelled/ terminated subprojects and those with 10 percent and above negative slippages, and approval of any fund realignment. (DA/PRDP)
e) Revisit subproject profile of participating LGUs and prioritize proposals for PWS considering the additional
37
Audit Observations Recommendations
IA Project Amount
(Million P) Remarks
DA PRDP P439.092 million were targeted for completion as of December 31, 2017. Of the targeted projects, only 132 subprojects costing P132.260 million were completed leaving 210 subprojects costing P306.832 million still ongoing, or for implementation.
Not Indicated
Approved subprojects for communal irrigation system (CIS) and potable water system (PWS) remained substantially low at 6 and 32 percent, respectively, hence not corresponding with the targets specified in the Project Appraisal Document (PAD).
330.026 The accomplishments/work progress of the Construction of FMR subprojects in PLGU Camarines Sur, MLGUs Esperanza, Masbate and Sison, Surigao del Norte were notably sluggish contrary to the goals and objectives of PRDP, thus delaying the delivery of much needed roads.
305.066 Improvements of farm-to-market roads in Mountain Province, CAR are behind schedule.
3.291 The Mountain Province Arabica Coffee Enterprise project under (I-REAP) component has not yet been started despite availability of funds intended for the project.
1.536 Fund transfers from DA-CAR for the Philippine Rural Development Project remained unutilized contrary to provisions of the Memorandum of Agreement. (Municipality of Banko, CAR)
2.702 The procurement of various equipment for implementation of I-REAP subproject in PLGU Albay, was delayed by an average of 314 days from the time the purchase requests were issued until the receipt of the NOL2, thereby delaying its implementation. Moreover, MLGU Burgos, Ilocos Sur failed to immediately issue to the end-user the purchased farm tractor amounting to P0.950 million depriving the intended
financing under the I-Build Component; Submit the duly approved subproject profile eligible for expenditure of prioritized proponent LGU; and establish basis for evaluation and approval of proposal for other infrastructure subprojects. (DA/PRDP)
f) Direct the contractors to fast-track the completion of the projects, considering that these should have already been completed as of report date; and monitor regularly the status of implementation of the projects. (DA/PRDP)
g) Impose liquidated damages for the delay in project completion and take legal action as applicable; Demand from contractors repair of damaged portions of the projects; and consider providing sanctions for LGUs in case of non-compliance with terms and conditions in the scale-up of projects. (DA/PRDP/SCHARMP)
h) Address any project viability/ location sites, civil works or right of way issues during the planning or preliminary stage of procurement, prior to bidding and project implementation, to avoid delays and incurrence of additional cost. (DA/PRDP/ SCHARMP; NIA/JRMPII)
i) Ensure that the additional financing/fund realignment to cover the pipelined SPs is in line with the PRDP results framework as prescribed in the PAD; Submit disposition for the unfunded SP proposals amounting to P15.269 billion considering
38
Audit Observations Recommendations
IA Project Amount
(Million P) Remarks
DA PRDP user of the early use of the same.
Not Indicated
Additional expenses for materials and other inputs needed for the implementation of the projects were incurred using the contributed equity of the PG-CSOs. (PLGU Iloilo)
9,168.00 The remaining unprogrammed fund including the additional financing is still insufficient to cover the (a) pipelined sub-projects (SPs) pending approval costing P24.437 billion; and (b) projected number of PLGUs to engage as provided in the Project Appraisal Document (PAD).
SCHARMP 24.137 Three infrastructure subprojects were not fully implemented with unfinished portions costing P1.907 million as of December 31, 2017, as of closing date of the project, thereby, depriving the public of the services and benefits that could have been derived from the project.
Recon-struction of DA/ NAFC LDC Bldg.
16.322 Cash allocation of P16.322 million or 74 percent of the total allocation of P21.946 million received in CY 2017 for the construction of the new building was not utilized by Management.
NRIMPPII 0.023 The lapses in the procurement, delivery and distribution of Universal Testing Machines prolonged the attainment of the Agency’s objective of upgrading the capacity for material testing in Sub-Regional Laboratories and deprived the intended recipients of the immediate benefits that could be derived therefrom, as well as, incurrence of unnecessary expenses.
DOTr (7 Projects)
PPADP NBAC- SEPP New CNS/ ATM CEMTSMMP
MSCIP Phase I/II Cebu BRT &
PCGCDP
19.899 Of the total allotments received inclusive of continuing appropriations, the amount of P15.400 billion or 77.39 percent was obligated, leaving an unobligated allotment of P4.499 billion or 22.61 percent as of 31 December 2017. On the other hand, of the total cash allocations received of P4.549 million, only P2.358 billion was utilized, resulting in the reversion of P2.192 billion or 48.18 percent to the BTr.
the depleted fund for I-Build Component to ensure that these can still be implemented. Resolve the insufficient funding requirement for the remaining 14 PLGUs with pending SP proposal. (DA/PRDP)
j) Direct the LCE of MLGU Esperanza, Masbate to prioritize and take appropriate action in the implementation of Charcoal Briquette Production Enterprise to warrant timely delivery of the benefit therefrom. (DA/PRDP)
k) Require the LGUs to complete the projects immediately or return the unliquidated amounts to the SCHARMP and allocate funds for its operation and maintenance as required under the MOA; Resolve the problem on right of way for the installation of pipes; and Demand from the contractor repair of the damaged portions of the projects; (DA/SCHARMP)
l) Submit to COA, copy of the contract on the Procurement of New Rolling Stock LRV (4th Generation) and justifications/ causes of delay or negative slippages of the CEMTSMMP components and courses of actions taken to address delays; Prepare a revised Detailed Time Schedule and a catch-up/work plan to attain the target completion dates indicated in the contracts; Require all stakeholders to avoid/minimize delays in the procurement process and implementation of the project. (DOTr/CEMTSMMP)
39
Audit Observations Recommendations
IA Project Amount
(Million P) Remarks
CEMTSMMP 10,562.00 Despite availability of the loan facility amounting to ¥43.252 billion, financed by JICA to fund the Construction of the LRT Line 1 South (Cavite) Extension and LRT Line 2 East (Masinag) Extension Projects, implementation was delayed due to slow procurement process. The delay in project implementation also resulted in low utilization/availment of loan proceeds, hence, the accumulation of Commitment Fees for CYs 2013-2017.
DENR INREMP Not Indicated
DENR CAR has no disbursement for INREMP-LP and registered low disbursement rate of 66.67 percent for INREMP-GOP due to the delayed implementation of the project.
DOH EU-HSPSP II
415.000 Non-achievement of three targeted performance indicators required for the release of the variable tranche resulted in non-availment of €3.9 million grant; and Slow or delayed implementation of civil works/infrastructure resulted in unutilized grant amounting to P415 million.
NIA
JRMPP II
1,103.000 Completion of the project within the five (5) year period of November 28, 2012 to November 28, 2017 and extended project completion of September 2021 was affected by the following:
Delays in implementation resulted in deferment of provision of year-round irrigation to 31,840 hectares of farm lots in the Province of Iloilo. This is despite incurrence of cumulative expenses as of December 31, 2017.
Delay in procurement of Consultancy Services for the Detailed and Construction Supervision, and the Writ of Kalikasan.
As at year-end, the Engineering Department reported under its Status
m) Effectively plan and monitor the project accomplishment so that timely decisions can be undertaken, such as submission of requests in case of realignments, and follow-ups for the issuance of No Objection Letter (NOL) and Clearance from DBM for timely settlement of obligations. (DENR/INREMP)
n) Strengthen selections of targeted performance indicators to come up with a more attainable performance indicators that are within the control of the DOH; Include end-users during the selection and procurement planning of all civil works/infrastructure projects to minimize, if not totally avoid, changes delaying project implementation; and Monitor and strengthen coordination with IAs to ensure timely project completion. Also incorporate lessons learned from completed projects to avoid incurrence of the same project deficiencies in the future. (DOH/EU-HSPSP II)
o) Direct project engineers to ensure that plans and program of works are as accurate as possible to minimize variations; and Act with dispatch in resolving the existing issues/problems that are currently hampering/ delaying the completion of the projects. (NIA-JRMMPII)
p) ACT/RPMO personnel to: Closely monitor, supervise and provide technical assistance to the BSPMC during project
40
Audit Observations Recommendations
IA Project Amount
(Million P) Remarks
NIA
JRMPP II
Report an Overall Physical Weighted Accomplishment of only 13.56 percent despite availability of funds and personnel.
DSWD (2 Projects)
KC- NCDDP ADB & WB
Not Indicated
The project registered a physical accomplishment of 81.32 percent as of December 31, 2017, slightly below the 85 percent KC-NCDDP Results Framework for CY 2017 requirement per loan agreement, thus, falling short of its objective of providing selected community of improved access to services and infrastructure and to participate in more inclusive management planning, budgeting and implementation.
4,804.86 The lapses in monitoring and reporting by NPMO and Regional PMO resulted in low percentage of implementation/ downloading of community grants of 62.58 percent as against the 82.65 percent target per KC-NCDDP Operations Manual; and huge unutilized amount which remained in the bank as of December 31, 2017, thus depriving the community of the immediate benefits due them.
KALAHI- CIDSS Sub- Projects/ GPPB/BUB
Ineffective asset management of KALAHI-CIDSS Projects in subprojects such as in adequately maintained or damage projects, no longer fully functional, inactive and unregistered/ unaccredited associations for completed Income-Generating Projects.
BFAR Fish Coral
8.277 Cash allocation of 14.71 percent of the NCA of P56.257 million received as of December 31, 2017 was not utilized by management due to various constraints resulting in the reversion thereof and delay in the implementation of various activities.
implementation and immediately correct the defects/deficiencies noted for the full continuity and functionality of the SPs; Conduct regular coordination with other infrastructure government agencies to avoid overlapping of projects to the extent that completed KC projects are inadvertently removed to make way for other agency’s (e.g. DPWH) infra projects; Provide storage facilities before the delivery of the construction materials at the site for security; Institute necessary action against the RPMO/ACT/ BSPMC who were remiss in monitoring and evaluation of the SPs; and Ensure all work items necessary to make the project functional/operational are properly identified in the planning stage particularly in the preparation of the Program of Works. (DSWD-KC-NCDDP-ADB & WB)
q) NPMO/RPMO to:
Systematize downloading of funds and ensure that the available proceeds are implemented in accordance with approved budget, project milestones, and performance expectations; and Prepare monthly monitoring reports as feedback mechanism to ensure that project deficiencies and problems encountered are appropriately and immediately addressed by concerned officials. (DSWD/KC-NCDDP-ADB & WB)
r) DSWD RPMO of KALAHI- CIDDS to: Make representations with LGUs to monitor/revisit the different
41
Audit Observations Recommendations
projects implemented in the different municipalities and barangays; Continue the Sustainability Evaluation Test to ascertain the functionalities of the different subprojects; Require the contractor to immediately correct the defects/deficiencies noted for the full functionality of the SPs for the benefits of the intended beneficiaries in accordance with Section 12.5 of the Special Conditions of the Contract which provides for a warranty period of 15 years; to assess their status and functionality, in order to address the problems on a timely manner and avoid wastage of government funds. (DSWD/KALAHI-CIDSS: KKB or GPPB Project)
s) Ensure that programs, projects and activities are ready for implementation upon the release of the allocated funds; and Install budget performance tracking system to monitor the utilization of allotments in order to prevent the lapsing of cash allocations; (BFAR/Fish Coral)
2. Implementation of various projects was affected by either delayed/non-submission/inability of recipients to meet documentary requirements, or deficiencies in the contract and its implementation, delayed procurement process, or non-compliance with RA No. 9184 or contract covenants, among others, which may adversely affect completion of projects on time and/or effective utilization of completed projects. Further evaluation by the concerned audit team disclosed that the implementation of various projects are affected by the following conditions:
Management to require the
concerned officials to:
a) Closely coordinate with the
NEDA-ICC and the French
Government for the approval
and concurrence of the
amended Terms of Reference
to facilitate the awarding of the
contract to the winning
contractor and the registration
to the Financial Protocol to
avoid further delays in the
42
Audit Observations Recommendations
IA Project Amount
(Million P) Remarks
BFAR PHILO Project Phase 2
Not Indicated
The implementation of the project was not yet started after almost two years since the approval of the Loan Agreement in CY 2016 due to delayed procurement process which caused the non-registration of approved contracts to the Financial Protocol between the two contracting governments.
DA PRDP Non-preparation/revision of SP components and procurement plan/Work and Financial Plan (MLGU Placer, Masbate and PLGU Iloilo)
PRDP NPCO, PSOs
2,125.00 Various issues in the IMA entered into by the PSO Luzon B and proponent LGUs for the implementation of I-Build Component subprojects consisting of the following: a. Stipulations in the IMA as well as
its supporting documents were deficient/not submitted or not compliant with the I-Build Manual, GAA and IMA;
b. Schedules of releases of fund
inconsistent with the provisions in the I-Build Manual;
c. Signatories in the ORs, are non-
compliant with the DA General Memorandum Order on the delegated authority;
d. Incomplete documentary
requirements to support the fund transfer to the proponent LGU; and
e. Contract Cost in excess of
Estimated Project Cost (EPC)
Not Indicated
Various non-compliance in the implementation of I-REAP subprojects in PLGU Antique were noted including (a) retention of income by the recipient affecting subproject sustainability; (b) non-compliance on sale and collections procedures; (c) non-compliance on the disbursement of funds policy; (d)
implementation of the project.
(BFAR/PHILOPP2)
b) Municipal personnel
concerned in MLGU Placer,
Masbate to prepare and
submit the updated schedule
of disbursement and project
implementation plan;
(DA/PRDP)
c) PSO Luzon B to include in the
IMA all required provisions
including penalty
clause/sanctions in case of
non-compliance or non-
performance and
cessation/winding up of the
project/contract or support
IMA with document that would
compensate for the deficient
provisions to form part of the
terms and conditions, and
submit to the concerned
Auditor for audit to preclude
the issuance of NS, as
applicable;
d) Provide for the bases of two
different Schedule of Fund
Releases, and schedule of
fund release for the
improvement of Sta. Catalina
Norte-San Isidro-Kinatihan II-
Kinatihan I FMR located in
MLGU Candelaria, Quezon;
e) Issue a written policy in the
appropriate adjustment of
ABC in conjunction with the
existing provisions with RA
9184 IRR and GPPB
Resolution, as applicable,
define the extent of
“substantially higher” bid that
should be rejected outright
within the scope of PRDP
43
Audit Observations Recommendations
IA Project Amount
(Million P) Remarks
DA PRDP NPCO, PSOs
no binding contract agreement between the Lead PG and recipients resulting in undefined accountability of the contracting parties; and (e) non-maintenance of financial records contrary to the provisions of I-REAP Operations Manual, Enterprise Investment Agreement and Business Plan.
The project incurred negative slippage of 5.33 percent deviating from the approved plans and project's S-Curve; thus, delaying its completion and the benefits that the constituents could have derived therefrom. (CAR-Benguet)
The project was not constructed in accordance with the plans and specifications that might result to inferior quality of the project and eventually deny the constituents of its extensive utilization. (CAR-Benguet)
The implementation of the project was suspended due to non-compliance with the 18% gradient of the PRDP delaying its final completion and the benefits that farmers could derive therefrom. (CAR-Benguet)
0.314 Purchase of semi-expendable PPE outside the purpose for which it was intended or not utilized at all hence considered unnecessary.
PRDP
219.881 Concreting of Pinagwarasan to Lanot Road project (I-Build Component) was not completed on schedule or within the specified con- tract time, contrary to Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) and Section 2 of PD No. 1445, thus, the delivery of desired benefits of farmers and fishers to improve their lives was not achieved. (Camarines Norte)
Not Indicated
The project Rehabilitation/ Concreting of Poblacion-Farmington-Galingon-Balacbaan-Cabong-Tilubong FMR, Municipality of Tampilisan ZDN, is 39.751%
subproject procurement
consistent with prevailing
laws, rules and regulations,
and resolve the inconsistent
provisions in the IMA on
additional cost for contract
cost exceeding the EPC and
the bases thereof considering
the depleted fund for the I-
Build Component. (DA/PRDP)
f) PRDP Project Director to:
Direct the NPCO and PSO
Luzon B to submit proof,
document or report showing
that the identified 17
geotagged devices, DSLR
cameras were actually used
for its intended purpose to
preclude the issuance of ND
as a result of
unnecessary/excessive
procurement, and provide a
definite timeline for the
installation and utilization of
the fax machine as the use of
the equipment could not be
ascertained at a specific time.
g) Require the Head of NPCO to
identify each recipient of the
mobile wifi indicating the
reasons for the need for the
same with certification from
DA officials that no gadget of
similar nature was previously
issued to them. (DA/PRDP
NPCO, PSOs)
h) Strictly monitor
implementation of the project
in accordance with the plans
and specifications; Compel
the Contractor to immediately
complete the project and
repair defects, remove and
replace the sections with
44
Audit Observations Recommendations
IA Project Amount
(Million P) Remarks
DA PRDP complete per report of the PPMIU Resident Engineer. It was determined that as of December 31, 2017, the project should have been 42.22% completed thereby incurring a negative slippage of 2.47%. (Zamboanga del Norte)
The steel screen surrounding the Cacao Production and Marketing, Municipality of Piñan, ZDN for the vermicast was already partly damaged as evidenced by presence of rust. The project will be delayed by 1 to 2 months due to the grafting of the seedlings. The PPMIU of the PLGU did not conduct monitoring and evaluation of the project which is required under Section 5.0 of the signed IMA. (Zamboanga del Norte)
The Abaca Fiber, Municipality of Kalawit, and Swine Production and Marketing Enterprises, Municipality of Siayan, both ZDN projects, have not yet commenced. The PLGU has already set up its counterpart funds for the project. (Zamboanga del Norte)
DA
ARCP II 22.420 Delayed implementation and non-completion of the Rehabilitation with 2.0 km Concreting of Sitio Bolanao-Litolet FMR and Moyo-Sitio Pase FMR projects within the time frame, resulting in the cancellation of allocated funds in violation of Annex I, Revised IRR of RA No. 9184. (Zamboanga del Norte)
26.021 Non-completion within the time frame of the Concreting of Motibot- Sto. Rosario FMR as provided in the contract and Revised IRR of RA No. 9184.
DA PRDP 0.200 4.613
Deficiencies in the implementation of the Concreting of Bukang Liwayway- Makandring FMR at Bgy. Langogan and preparation of the ABC and POW was not in accordance with the guidelines set forth under DPWH DO No. 22 dated February 18, 2015, thus, resulting in excessive contract costs. (Puerto Princesa)
severe honeycombs or any
defective installed items; and
institute legal actions against
the contractor for failure to
undertake and/or complete
the project within the periods
specified in the contract.
(DA/PRDP/Puerto Princesa &
Mt. Provinces)
i) Consider a different gradient
for PRDP projects
implemented in the Province
of Benguet or whole of
Cordillera Administrative
Region because of the terrain
in the region; and henceforth,
conduct survey on all
proposed project sites to
determine their actual
physical conditions before the
preparation of plans and
specifications to prevent
suspension of the projects
during implementation.
(DA/PRDP)
j) Comply with the provisions of
the IMA and the Manual of
implementation for PRDP I-
Build project specifically the
imposition of liquidated
damages for all contract or
project which incurred
delayed. Should there be time
extension, submit all pertinent
documents for evaluation.
(DA/PRDP)
k) Monitoring & Evaluation Sub-
Unit, and the Procurement
Sub-Unit to provide necessary
assistance to fast-track
procurement of goods
necessary for implementation
of the project "Mountain
Province Arabica Coffee
45
Audit Observations Recommendations
IA Project Amount
(Million P) Remarks
I-REAP 305.066 The implementation of four FMR projects is behind schedule resulting in delayed delivery of better road networks to the intended beneficiaries. (Mt. Province)
3.291 The project component has not yet been started despite the availability of funds intended for the project.
MINSAAD Not Indicated
Implementation and completion of various Agri-Business, Agro-Forestry, and Infrastructure Projects was not implemented within the time frame, thus, delaying delivery of benefits to the intended beneficiaries. (Compostela Valley)
Rice seedlings distributed did not sustain for long time due to unsuitable climate condition, thus, did not benefit the beneficiaries. (Compostela Valley)
Implementation of seventeen MINSAAD projects of DARPO Davao del Sur is considerably delayed with only two being completed as of December 31, 2017, depriving the intended beneficiaries of the benefits expected to be derived from its purpose. (Compostela Valley)
DENR FMP Insufficient funds in PENROs Ifugao and Quirino and delayed mobilization of People’s Organization in PENROs Quirino, Nueva Vizcaya and Iloilo
Not Indicated
The Work and Financial Plan on the site Development Contract with the People's Organizations was not strictly followed resulting in the delayed implementation of the same and the low utilization of funds. (Iloilo)
DSWD
KC- NCDDP ADB & WB
15.340 Fourteen SPs were found deficient due to failure of RPMO/SRPMO as well as project proponents to monitor and resolve project issues, thus, may compromise the efficient and effective use of the facility and not in keeping with KC-NCDDP Community Empowerment Activity Cycle and Monitoring and Evaluation Sub-
Enterprise". (DA-Mt. Province/
PRDP)
l) Consult
residents/beneficiaries and
consider their
recommendation and other
factors that would affect the
output of the projects to avoid
wastage of resources.
(DA/MINSAAD)
m) Instruct personnel to closely
monitor accomplishment and
mobilization of the POs to
ensure project completion by
year 2022. (DENR/FMP)
n) Instruct the PPMO to monitor
and evaluate the adherence of
the POs to the WFP for SD
contracts awarded to ensure
the proper implementation of
the projects; and Adopt
measures or catch up plan to
address the delayed
implementation of the
activities in the SD contracts;
(DENR/FMP)
o) ACTs and RPMOs personnel
to: Regularly monitor the on-
going and unimplemented
SPs especially those at the
far-flung areas and fast track
their completion; Request
assistance from the LGUs in
the acquisition of project sites;
Make representation with the
concerned government
agencies for the immediate
release of clearances and
permits needed for the
projects; Enjoin the
community to work within the
timeline of the project
implementation; Furnish the
46
Audit Observations Recommendations
IA Project Amount
(Million P) Remarks
Manual for Program Implementer.
SPSP 1,205.80 The account balances of CCT/MCCT beneficiaries under the cash card, prepaid card, and FCB mode of payment included 1.89 million accounts with balance of P1.206 billion, ranging from P501 to more than P50,000 that were not withdrawn from 30 to 2,190 days upon pay-out, thereby showing that there is no immediate need for the financial assistance, and casting doubt on the eligibility of the chosen beneficiaries. Moreover, 32,783 accounts with a total balance P108.614 million have no date of last monetary activity, but still included in the list of beneficiaries.
DA
SCHARMP 0.286 The project, “Rehabilitation of Masla-Duagan Farm to Market Road” still incurred deficiencies as re-validated and re-inspected by COA Technical Services.
DOTr CBRT
312.65 Transfer of the procurement of Technical Support Consultant (TSC) by the Department of Transportation (DOTr) to the Procurement Service – Department of Budget and Management (PS-DBM) despite having its own Bids and Awards Committee (BAC) caused further overall delay in the implementation of Cebu Bus Rapid Transit (CBRT) Project for more than one year and two months as of year-end and incurrence of unnecessary administrative cost of P2.952 million in the form of service fee. The delay in project implementation also resulted in low utilization/availment of loan proceeds hence the accumulation of CFs for CYs 2015-2017.
NBACSEPPCEMTSMMP: CBRT Project; New CNS/ATM
1,333.53 Recoupment of CY 2016 balance of the account Advances to Contractors of P3,411.100 million and additional advances of P217.471 million during the year, or a total of P3.629 billion was only P2.295 billion or 67.28 percent thereby, leaving a balance of the account of P1,333.526 million as
BSPMCs with the list of good
standing contractors and
suppliers; and blacklist erring
contractors and suppliers.
(DSWD/KC-NCDDP-ADB &
WB)
p) Officials to remit in full to the
BTr the amount refunded by
conduits representing
unclaimed cash grants of prior
years; and Revisit and
strengthen the policy on
forfeiture of unclaimed cash
grants and remittance of
refunds to the BTr to ensure
that government resources
are maximized.
(DSWD/SPSP)
q) Issue final notice to Contractor
to correct deficiency,
otherwise, ND will be issued
covering the amount of
deficiency. (DA/SCHARMP)
r) Submit the reason/causes of
the delay and/or negative
slippages of the project
components, and work plan to
address the delays, and
justification on the transfer of
procurement of TSC to the
PS–DBM despite WB and
GPPB’s recommendations;
Prepare a catch-up/work plan
to attain the target completion
dates indicated in the agreed
timelines; Require all
stakeholders to
avoid/minimize further delays
in the procurement process of
the remaining project’s
components and their
implementation; and Require
the PMO-CBRT to adopt an
effective project monitoring
47
Audit Observations Recommendations
IA Project Amount
(Million P) Remarks
Project; MSCIP & PPADP
at year-end. The low recoupment rate could be attributed to the delayed submission of claims for progress billings of the consultant for New Bohol Airport Construction and Sustainable Environment Protection Project (NBACSEPP).
DPWH
CLLExP, ARBP II, PMRCIP II, FRMP, RUPP and RIIDP
27.647 Delayed procurement procedure and project implementation by selected contractors; and current issues on relocation of informal settlers and viability/practicability of project sites which should have been addressed during feasibility or preliminary engineering study.
NRIMPP II
0.023 Lapses in the procurement, delivery and distribution of Universal Testing Machines resulting in incurrence of unnecessary expenses.
DOE E-Trikes 94.029 The specifications of some items offered by the winning bidder were not in conformity with the Agency requirements and contract specifications. Further, the reasonableness of the contract cost could not be determined due to the absence of detailed breakdown of the Approved Budget for the Contract (ABC) and Contract Cost. There was only six months remaining before the closing of the loans. Commitment charges and management fees were incurred due to low loan availment.
MDFO ARCP 2 Not Indicated
Delayed/Non-submission of or inability of the LGUs to meet documentary requirements for the release of fund for sub-projects.
NIA PIDP 44.74 The leniency of BAC and TWG resulted in the award of a contract for Mindoro Oriental Marinduque Romblon (MOMARO) IMO to a non-compliant/ineligible contractor as discussed below:
Completeness of information in the Contractor’s Key Personnel’s Affidavit of Commitment to Work on the Contract to know whether the Contractor and his key
system and to fully utilize the
work of the Financial
Management Specialist to
maximize loan availments and
avoid accumulation of CFs.
(DOTr/CBRT)
s) Ensure continuous and
effective monitoring of
additions/payments and
recoupments of Advances to
Contractors and require all the
PMOs to adopt an effective
project monitoring system;
require contractors and/or
consultants to expedite
submission of Claims for
Payment or Progress Billings;
and submit
reason/justification on the late
filing of the said PBs and
actions taken by PMOs.
(DOTr/NBACSEPP;CEMTSM
MP:CBRT Project; New
CNS/ATM Project; MSCIP;
and PPADP)
t) Adopt efficient and timely
procurement procedure and
comply with duly responsive
strategies adopted to
accelerate fund utilization;
Prepare catch up plan to
ensure that the projects are
implemented on targeted
schedule; Impose liquidated
damages; and initiate
termination/rescission of
contract on projects with
liquidated damages of 10
percent and negative
slippages of more than 15
percent due to contractor’s
fault or negligence, pursuant
to Section 68 and Annex I, of
the Revised IRR of RA 9184;
Disclosed during the planning
48
Audit Observations Recommendations
IA Project Amount
(Million P) Remarks
personnel have on-going project/s with other IMOs within the NIA MIMAROPA Region not verified.
No proof of actual inspection of equipment and/or evaluation of ownership or lease/purchase agreement supporting the Equipment Utilization Schedule of on-going projects of the Contractor to ensure that equipment are still available for Contract implementation.
Comparison of the List of Contractor’s Equipment disclosed that the Contractor pledged some equipment which were already provided in the first two (2) Contracts with MOMARO IMO.
Duly-approved Construction Safety and Health Program and Contractor’s Environment Management Plan were not submitted.
Surety bond was posted by the Contractor instead of either of the required forms, particularly, cash, cashier’s/manager’s check, or bank guarantee.
NIA ARIIP Not Indicated
ARIIP is yet to be fully turned-over to NIA Regional Office No. I which is not in accordance with NIA Memorandum Circular No. 43 S. of 2007 and Plans of Action under Unnumbered NIA Memorandum dated March 24, 2015, thus affecting the account balances reflected in the financial statements of the Regional Office.
DBP DSSDP The Branch granted loans to private corporations out of ODA funds contrary to Section 4 of RA No. 8182 dated June 11, 1996, thus depriving other bonafide recipients of government priority economic and social development projects of needed funds. ODA shall not be availed of or utilized directly or indirectly for the Financing for private to commercial credit. Wadeford
stage any problems on
relocation of informal settlers
and viability of the project
discovered during preliminary
engineering study should be.
(DPWH/CLLExP, ARBP II,
PMRCIP II, FRMP, RUPP,
RIIDP & NRIMPP II;
DA/PRDP)
u) Provide explanation and/or
basis for accepting the
winning bidder’s offer despite
its non-conformity with the
required technical
specifications and provide the
detailed breakdown of the
ABC and Contract Cost.
Henceforth, require the
establishment of an ABC for
all projects, including ADB-
funded projects, as a basis to
determine if the bidders’ offer
is acceptable or not. (DOE/E-
Trikes)
v) Identify issues/difficulty in the
submission or compliance by
LGUs with documentary
requirements and provide
technical assistance to LGUs
as deemed necessary to
maximize availment of grants.
(MDFO/ARCP 2)
w) BAC and TWG to: Ensure that
procurement requirements
are consistently followed from
bid documents to project
completion, and that bid
evaluation and post-
qualification procedures
prescribed in the Revised IRR
of RA No. 9184 and GPPB
Manual of Procedures for the
Procurement of Infrastructure
Projects are strictly followed;
49
Audit Observations Recommendations
IA Project Amount
(Million P) Remarks
Foundation, Inc. and Saint Dominic School of Kalibo, are private corporations with ready access to commercial credit. (Region VI)
and Require the Head of the
Procuring Entity (HOPE) of
NIA-Occidental Mindoro IMO
to request the IAS and the
Legal Department of the NIA-
HO to conduct investigation to
determine the extent of
participation of the members
of the BAC and its TWG
including NIA officials in the
award of contracts to non-
compliant contractors and to
file appropriate charges, if
warranted. (NIA-PIDP)
x) Coordination with the former
officials of ARIIP who are
presently employed in
ARISEP in the turn-over of
completed project. Any
concerns relating to the
turnover must be discussed
by both parties and resolved.
In addition, assistance from
the Construction CMD of NIA
CO may be sought in case of
issues which could not be
resolved by the parties
involved in the turn-over.
(NIA/ARIIP)
y) Grant only term loans to
borrowers whose program
and projects are in
consonance with the national
priority projects pursuant to
Section 4 of RA No. 8182
dated June 11, 1996, and
submit valid justification for
the deviation from the criteria.
(DBP/DSSDP)
C. Financial Management
1. Payments were made even for transactions with incomplete/inadequate documentation, without legal basis or non-compliant with existing rules and regulations, among others. In other cases, payments
Management to require the
concerned officials to:
50
Audit Observations Recommendations
were made in full without deducting the required retention money.
In a number of instances, transactions without legal basis
and/or with incomplete or inadequate supporting
documents or non-compliant with existing rules and
regulations were just the same paid. The Team also
noted payments in full without deducting the required
retention money:
IA Project Amount
(Million P) Remarks
DA PRDP Not Indicated
Contractors/PG paid despite incomplete supporting documents. (PLGUs Bataan; Camarines Sur; Camarines Norte; Guimaras, Iloilo MLGUs Paoay, Ilocos Norte; Buenavista, Quezon; Nasipit, Agusan del Norte; Trento, Agusan del Sur)
Time extensions were granted several times despite deficient documentary requirements. (PLGUs Camarines Norte; Iloilo MLGU Veruela, Agusan del Sur)
Other deficiencies in the submission of contract and liquidation reports (PLGUs Sorsogon; Guimaras; Iloilo)
Travel expenses amounting to P300.00 or less incurred by the officials and employees of RPCO IV-A were not supported by a Certification of Expenses Not Requiring Receipts as required by COA Circular No. 2017-01 dated June 19, 2017.
Several claims for travelling expenses and per diems by the PRDP for the period August 2016 to June 2017 were paid in excess of the amounts allowed under EO No. 248 as revised under EO No. 298 dated March 23, 2004, thus, considered as excessive expenditures pursuant to COA Circular No. 2012-003 dated October 29, 2012. (Region II)
DA PRDP Not Indicated
Non-deduction of retention money from the claim of Contractors. (CLGU Lucena, Quezon and PLGU Albay) Absence of or expired performance security. (PLGU Albay and MLGU Trento, Agusan del Sur)
a) Submit all required
supporting document
including evidentiary support
on contract time extension;
computation of ABC and its
supporting Market Survey
and true copy of the JEV
issued by Region XII,
covering recorded receipt of
two units excavator,
transferred from the books of
the NIA Central Office, ARE
and report of Physical Count
of PPE as of December 31,
2014 and December 31,
2015 duly verified by the
COA Auditor to evaluate the
propriety of payments to the
contractor/PG. See to it that
disbursements of public
funds are supported with
complete documentation in
compliance with the
provisions of Section 4 of PD
1445.
(DENR/INREMP/FMP;
DA/PRDP; NIA/NISRIP)
b) PPMIU of PLGU Sorsogon
to ensure that PRDP
transactions are legal and
valid; require submission of
liquidation documents,
physical and financial
reports in accordance with
existing guidelines.
(DA/PRDP)
c) Comply with the existing
laws, rules and regulations
regarding the payment of
travelling expenses and per
diems and refund the excess
claims. (DA/PRDP)
d) Accountant to withhold the
uncollected/deficient
51
Audit Observations Recommendations
IA Project Amount
(Million P) Remarks
DA 0.354 Payments for Representation Expenses, Relocation Allowance in PSO Visayas and various purchases in RPCO XI were not supported with valid documentary requirements to prove the reasonableness and necessity of the transactions, thus, rendered the occurrence and validity of the disbursements, doubtful.
15.803 Honorarium/ incentive was paid to DA officers and employees detailed to NPCO, PSO Luzon A, RPCOs II, III, X and XI on a part-time or full-time basis without complying with the guidelines set forth in the DBM Circular No. 2007-2 dated October 1, 2007 and COA Circular No. 2012-001 dated June 14, 2012, thus, documentary requirements to support the payment thereof were inadequate.
The payment of performance incentive on March 2, 2017 by the PRDP to its consultants/ COS/project-hired and DA personnel has no legal basis and not in accordance with National Budget Circular No. 433 dated March 1, 1994 and Civil Service Commission (CSC) Resolution No. 020790 dated June 5, 2002, thus, considered as irregular and excessive expenditures pursuant to COA Circular No. 2012-003 dated October 29, 2012. (Region II)
2.305 The procurement procedural lapses such as non-posting of the Invitation to Bid and posting of 5% performance security in the claim for the implementation of I-REAP sub-projects for civil works portion, Oriental Mindoro Calamansi Trading Center and Buying Station, with a total contract cost of P2,305,362.00 violated Sections 21.2.1 (b) and 39.2 of the Revised IRR of RA No. 9184. Moreover, the paid disbursement vouchers on this claim were not supported with complete documentation contrary to Section 4.6 of PD No.1445.
retention money from
subsequent billings of
contractors in CLGU
Lucena, Quezon and PLGU
Albay, and to strictly
implement proper
withholding of retention
money on partial billings by
contractors, as applicable;
(DA/PRDP)
e) BAC and/or PEO of PLGU
Albay and MLGU Trento,
Agusan del Sur to strictly
comply with the Revised IRR
of RA No. 9184 on the proper
posting of performance
security and require
contractors to renew the
performance bond as
applicable and furnish the
Auditor a copy thereof;
f) Monitor implementation of
infrastructure projects with
more than one year contract
duration; (DA/PRDP)
g) Stop the practice of paying
honoraria to DA employee
assigned to the PRDP on a
part-time or full-time basis;
and Require the concerned
personnel to refund the
amount of the honoraria
received. (DA/PRDP)
h) Stop payment of salary
differential to full-time
detailed officials/personnel
in NPCO, RPCOs II and III,
PSOs Luzon A and Visayas
pending the Decision on the
Petition for Review filed by
the PRDP before the COA-
CP on November 6, 2017 on
the disallowed salary
52
Audit Observations Recommendations
IA Project Amount
(Million P) Remarks
DA PRDP- I-REAP I-BUILD
77.934 The incomplete submission of documents for the final inspection of the PRDP I-BUILD infrastructure subprojects, Concreting of Bagong Silang-Macatoc Farm to Market Road (FMR) at Victoria and Concreting of Dulangan I-II FMR, Baco, Oriental Mindoro, and I-REAP civil works portion, Construction of Oriental Mindoro Calamansi Trading Center at Bayanan II, Calapan City and Buying Station at Poblacion III, Victoria, Oriental Mindoro, with a total contract cost of P77,934,368.49, violated COA Circular No. 2012-001 dated June 14, 2012 and COA Circular No. 2009-001 dated February 12, 2009.
PRDP 5.426 Salary differential equivalent to the difference between the PRDP rate and basic salary rate was paid to full time DA/PLGU personnel designated to work in NPCO, PSOs Luzon A and Visayas, RPCOs II and III on a full-time basis contrary to Section 58, General Provisions of RA No. 10717 or the FY 2016 GAA and DBM Budget Circular No. 2007-2 dated October 1, 2007.
Not Indicated
Defective road construction of PLGU Isabela was noted in the implementation of I-Build and I-REAP subprojects.
PRDP- I-REAP I-BUILD
1.426 PSO Mindanao continued to grant year-end incentive to DA organic personnel on detail to PRDP and to
personnel on consultancy contract of services despite the absence of legal basis.
DA PRDP- I-REAP I-BUILD
2.938 The Approved Budget for Contract (ABC) and contract cost of the Rehabilitation of Imbang-Grande-Tagubong-Gemumua-Agahon-Agtabo FMR, Passi City in PLGU Iloilo are over by P2.375 million and P2.192 million, respectively, due to the erroneous mathematical computation of 1,800.70 square meters in the total area of Item 311-Portland Cement Concrete Pavement (PCCP). Likewise, the contract cost for the
differential granted in CY
2015 and the response of
DBM on the letter of inquiry
submitted by PRDP as to the
validity of payment to full-
time employees. (DA/PRDP)
i) PLGU Isabela to ensure that
all work items are computed
using the Detailed Unit Price
Analysis of DPWH to avoid
incurrence of over costing of
contracts and those found to
be defective based on
results of Technical
Evaluation and Inspection by
COA TAS be corrected
and/or rectified. Request for
re-evaluation/inspection
upon correction of the
deficiency. (DA/PRDP)
j) PLGU Iloilo to review the
computations in the ABC
and Contract Cost for the
quantity take off versus
COA Calculation which
resulted in the variance
indicated in the TSO Report;
and effect corrections, if
warranted; and MLGUs
Trento, Agusan Del Sur and
Nasipit, Agusan Del Norte to:
Instruct the Municipal
Accountant and Treasurer to
withhold/deduct the excess
amount from the amount
payable to the contractor,
otherwise, a ND will be
issued. (DA/PRDP)
k) Comply with the provisions
and guidelines in the
Revised IRR of RA No. 9184
particularly on budget
allocation, preparation of the
approved budget for the
53
Audit Observations Recommendations
IA Project Amount
(Million P) Remarks
DA Rehabilitation/Concreting of FMR in PLGU Isabela and MLGU Trento, Agusan del Sur and Rehabilitation of CIS in PLGU Nasipit, Agusan del Norte was found to be excessive considering that it is higher than the COA estimated cost. (PLGUs Iloilo, Isabela, MLGUs Trento, Agusan del Sur and Nasipit, Agusan del Norte).
PRDP RPCO X
1.087 Catering Services of various trainings and seminars in CY 2016 and 2017 were paid prior to the perfection of the terms and conditions agreed upon per Purchase Order (PO), contrary to the provisions of the Revised IRR of RA No. 9184.
0.424 Purchases of plane tickets on official travels of personnel were not included in the approved Annual Procurement Plan (APP) of the agency and procured without competitive bidding contrary to IRR and RA No. 9184, thus, no assurance that the prices obtained/offered were the lowest costs prevailing in the market.
IBRD-WB- PRDP project
0.200 4.613
The COA TAS noted several deficiencies in the implementation of Concreting of Bukang Liwayway- Makandring Farm to Market Road (IBRD-WB-PRDP project) at Bgy. Langogan. Moreover, preparation of the ABC and Program of Work (POW) was not in accordance with the guidelines set forth under DPWH Department Order (DO) No. 22 dated February 18, 2015, thus, resulting to excessive contract costs. (RO 4B, Palawan)
Not Indicated
Payment of Progress Billing for the Concreting of Bukang Liwayway to Makandring Farm to Market Road Project, Barangay Langogan did not meet the required minimum physical percentage of accomplishment based on the schedule stated on the PRDP Project Implementation Management Agreement (IMA).
Provisions of RA No. 9184 not
observed resulting in irregular expenditures. Several goods and services were purchased without any
contract, procurements
involving catering services,
procurements based on the
approved APP, documentary
requirements such as duly
signed request for
Quotations by the
prospective suppliers; and
Pre and Post Repair
Inspection Report. (various
projects)
l) Submit all lacking
documents to the Audit
Team and COA-TAS for the
final evaluation and
inspection of the affected
projects. (DA/PRDP/I-
REAP/I-BUILD/IBRD)
m) Stop the practice of
procuring plane tickets
directly from DAMPC,
instead include its cost in
cash advances granted to
the concerned personnel in
accordance with EO No. 248
dated May 19, 1995, as
amended by EO No. 248A
dated August 14, 1995 and
EO No. 298 dated March 23,
2014. (DA/PRDP)
n) Require the recipients of the
CY 2017 Year-End
Incentive, performance
incentive and honorarium to
refund the amount received
in full; and Stop the grant of
unauthorized benefits.
(DA/PRDP;
DENR/InREMP/FMP)
o) Prepare the ABC and POW
in accordance with the
revised guidelines set forth
under DPWH DO No. 197
54
Audit Observations Recommendations
IA Project Amount
(Million P) Remarks
perfected contract and/or fully/partially delivered/rendered prior to the approval/issuance of the Purchase Request (PR), Request For Quotation (RFQ) and Purchase Order (PO). Procurement of goods and services not coursed through the Bids and Awards Committee (BAC); and business name and address of prospective suppliers not indicated in the RFQ when issued, and procurement of motorcycle is irregular. (Ifugao, CAR)
DAR ARCP II 0.784 There were project expenses charged to GCF in CY 2017 although funds transferred were for prior years and without the corresponding legislative enactment for the use thereof for current expenses, contrary to Section 28, Chapter 4, Book VI of EO No. 292. Likewise, expenses thereto were not properly documented and recorded.
CONVER-
GE 0.385 A fixed monthly honoraria were given
to personnel without valid and justifiable basis.
MINSAAD 0 Mobile paid for CY 2017 was not supported with authority/Special
Order specifying the officials and employees entitled to mobile privileges.
DENR
INREMP
0.460 Disbursements for catering services during the conduct of four days Seminar-Trainings in PENRO-Lanao del Norte exceeded the approved budgets for the activities in violation of the provisions of Sections 10 and 31.1 of the Revised IRR of RA No. 9184, Section 4 of PD No. 1445 and COA Circular No. 2012-001 dated June 14, 2012, thereby casting doubt on the validity of the transactions paid.
PENRO Ifugao
Not Indicated
Payment for reimbursement of travelling expenses of PENRO-Bukidnon personnel during CY 2017 were not evaluated with regard to its urgency and necessity, as the number of days allegedly travelled in achieving their respective purposes were excessive.
dated October 7, 2016; and
Require all contractors of the
affected projects to refund
the total excess cost of
P4,613,412.88 or deduct the
same from any money claim
or retention fee due them or
other securities posted by
them; and to repair the
defects and other installed
items or unperformed works
noted amounting to
P200,141.25 or deduct the
amount of cost deficiencies
from any money claim or
retention fee due them or
other securities posted by
them. (DA/ IBRD-WB-PRDP
project)
p) Strictly comply with the MOA
or IMA, particularly in the
financial management
system for National
Government Agency funded
programs/ projects/activities
in a manner adequate to
reflect the operations of the
City Government in carrying
out the Sub-project or any
part thereof.
q) Refrain from using the
balance of the GCF for
current year expenses.
(DAR/ARCP II)
r) Submit legal basis for the
payment of honoraria with
report of accomplishments
showing level of difficulty of
their duties and
responsibilities, the extent of
productivity and quality of
performance of the
recipients of honoraria.
(DAR/CONVERGE)
55
Audit Observations Recommendations
IA Project Amount
(Million P) Remarks
FMP
0.425 Payment of Honoraria to DENR RO VI and PENRO Iloilo officials and personnel was not included in CY 2017 FMP Work and Financial Plan (WFP), thus, may be considered illegal expenditures.
Non-deduction of retention money for warranty as required under Section 54.5 and Section 62 of the 2016 Revised IRR of RA No. 9184, thus, correction of defects for the works done was not assured. (PENRO-Ifugao)
0.707 Plantation sites with total area of 138.53 hectares were established within the existing natural forest contrary to DENR Memorandum Circular No. 11, dated Oct. 11, 1988 thus resulting in overpayment. (CAR, Ifugao)
0.055 Honoraria paid to DENR RO VI officials involved in the implementation of the Forestland Management Project (FMP) was charged against the Fund 101 Trust contrary to Section 4 (3) of PD No. 1455 and DBM Budget Circular No. 2007-002 dated October 1, 2007, thus, may be considered as illegal expenditures. (Region VI)
0.114 Repair of vehicle in PENRO Ifugao is beyond the 30 percent maximum allowable cost of repair of vehicle, thus, considered unnecessary and excessive.
DENR PENRO Kalinga
INREMP 0.434 Unit costs of contracts awarded for the implementation of afforestation and reforestation projects for CY 2016 are inconsistent with FMB Technical Bulletin 1-2, thus unnecessarily increasing expenditures. (CAR, Kalinga)
LBP YRP Not Indicated
The Progress billings/payments to LGUs and Contractors for the projects lacks documents required in the separate Agreement to the Financing and Project Agreement and related Progress Billing Procedures. The YRP Special Deposit Account disclosed deviations from the terms
s) Submit justification for
charging the expenses to the
project instead of from the
regular funds and the basis
for claiming in excess of
P1,000.00 monthly
allocation for division chiefs;
and concerned claimants to
attach a copy of the SO
entitling them to cellphone
allowances.
(DAR/MINSAAD)
t) Discontinue the practice of
charging to Fund 101 Trust
account, expenses which
was not related to the
purpose for which the trust
was created.
(DENR/INREMP/FMP)
u) PENRO Ifugao to consider
disposing fully depreciated
vehicle and no longer
economical to maintain to
avoid further incurrence of
expenses and make
representation with the DBM
for acquisition of a new
vehicle. (DENR/FMP)
v) Request the repair shop
concerned to fix air
conditioning unit of the
vehicle free of charge; and
deduct retention for warranty
security or require special
bank guarantee pursuant to
Section 62.1 of the 2016
Revised IRR of RA No. 9184.
(DENR/FMP-PENRO
Ifugao)
w) Submit justification on
payment of plantation site
within the existing natural
56
Audit Observations Recommendations
IA Project Amount
(Million P) Remarks
and conditions of the Separate Agreement to the Financing and Project Agreement, such as: non-submission of certain requirements for progress billings/payments; and the total amount of ORs issued by the Contractor does not correspond/reconcile with the total amount released to LGUs. These were not supported by ORs.
NIA
PIDP
0 The documents supporting payments made to Equi-Parco Construction Company for Contract No. PIDP11-C-BRISN-3 were not complete, contrary to Section 4(6) of PD No. 1445. Thus, validity and propriety of payments could not be ascertained. The incomplete documentation, along with the non-approval of key personnel replacements and quantity changes, inconsistent signatories, and excessive time extension without supporting no objection document from World Bank (WB) and without approved revised PERT/CPM Network Diagram; are indicative of poor execution, supervision, monitoring, and evaluation of the procurement and implementation of the Project.
NISRIP
13.365 The non-submission of documentary requirements for procurement of goods for the supply and delivery of one (1) unit Hydraulic Excavator, crawler mounted and one (1) unit Hydraulic Excavator, crawler swampy, cast doubt on the propriety of the disbursement. Likewise, the inconsistencies in the dates of the delivery and acceptance of the equipment as shown/reported in various documents resulted in inadequate imposition of liquidated damages (LD). LD should have been computed from September 28, 2014 to July 22, 2015, equivalent to 296 days in the amount of P1.34 million, but the penalty imposed and paid by the contractor per NIA’s OR No. 221250 dated May 26, 2017 was only P44,045.83, short of P1.29 million.
forest. Henceforth, consider
the existence of micro forest
in future reforestation
contracts to avoid waste of
government funds.
(DENR/FMP/PENRO-
Ifugao)
x) Make representation with
higher authorities for
clarifications on the
inconsistencies in unit cost
and submit replies to the
office of the auditor; and
Amend contracts awarded if
warrantied to avoid
disallowance in audit.
(DENR/INREMP/PENRO-
Kalinga)
y) Comply with disbursement
procedures in the Separate
Agreement Financing and
Project Agreement between
the KfW and LBP, and
related Progress Billing
Procedures to ensure
successful implementation
of the project; and Require
LGU to submit ORs issued
by the Contractor for funds
received. (LBP-YRP)
z) PIDP PMO to submit lacking
documents and ensure
adequate supervision over
implementation of the
Contract; Monitor the
equipment mobilized and
key project personnel
deployed in the Project;
Prepare and submit Daily
Inspector’s Report to PIDP
PMO; and Completely
evaluate work
accomplishment to
determine whether each
57
Audit Observations Recommendations
IA Project Amount
(Million P) Remarks
Hotel accommodation and meals of personnel from other Offices were paid from NIA INIMO Fund 501 LFPs contrary to Section 6 of Executive Order No, 298, s. 2004. (Region I)
TIEZA BEIP 442.636 Transfer Certificate of Title (TCT) to the Investment Properties acquired by TIEZA either by purchase or donation remained not in its name.
work item delivered is
compliant with the Technical
Specifications (TS) of similar
contracts. (NIA-PIDP)
aa) Impose liquidated damages
for every delay in the
subproject implementation;
Bill the contractor and collect
the remaining liquidated
damages; Initiate the
conduct of an investigation
to determine the extent of
participation of NIA officials
and employees in the
delivery of equipment
resulting in non-imposition of
the maximum liquidated
damages and file
appropriate charges if
warranted.
(NIA/NISRIP;DA/PRDP)
bb) Payment of travel expenses
shall be strictly in
accordance with Section 6,
EO No. 298 s. 2004, in case
of payment of actual
expenses, the necessity of
such expense shall be
certified by the head of the
agency. (NIA/NISRIP)
cc) Expedite the transfer of the
real properties’ title in the
name of TIEZA. (BEIP)
2. The financial reports/documents were not submitted to the concerned Auditors within the period prescribed under existing laws, rules and regulations.
The concerned implementing agencies failed to submit to the concerned Audit Teams financial statements and reports within the period prescribed under foreign donors’ guidelines/manuals, existing laws, rules and regulations. Thus, timely audit actions cannot be undertaken as in the following instances:
Management is required to:
a) Accountant, Focal Person
and Finance Unit to
immediately submit DVs,
IMA, Purchase Orders,
contracts duly supported,
terminal reports, Statement
of Receipts and
Expenditures and all
58
Audit Observations Recommendations
IA Project Amount
(Million P) Remarks
DA PRDP 61.535 The accounting and financial reports/statements and DVs and/or Statement of Receipts and Expenditures and RCI of three PSOs, four RPCOs, eight PLGUs and six MLGUs were not submitted for review within the prescribed period contrary to Sections 6.7.1 and 6.7.2 of PRDP Financial Management Operations Guidelines.
666.608 Copy of IMA, POs and contracts together with supporting documents were not submitted by RPCO V, PSO Mindanao and MLGU Trento, Agusan del Sur within five days after its perfection, contrary to COA Circular No. 2009-001, RA No. 9184 Revised IRR, World Bank Procurement Guidelines and PRDP Operations Manual (FMOM).
Not Indicated
Bank Reconciliation Statements (BRS) under MDS and Trust accounts were not in conformity with the prescribed GAM format and were not submitted within the prescribed period. (Region II)
SCHARMP 1.310 Sixty one (61) DVs pertaining to the period September and December 2017 remained unsubmitted as of audit date.
EHRDP Not Indicated
Approved Terminal Report and financial reports to establish the physical and financial accomplishment of the Program not submitted.
DENR FMP INREMP
Not Indicated
BRS were not submitted within the prescribed period, contrary to Section 5, Chapter 21 of the GAM, Volume I; Section 74 of PD No. 1445 and COA Circular No. 92-125A.
The Monthly Report of Official Travels and Monthly Report of Fuel Consumption were not submitted, contrary to COA Circular No. 2013-002.
accounting and financial
reports to COA, otherwise,
suspension of the salaries of
concerned personnel will be
recommended until they
complied with the
requirements of the
Commission; Strictly
observe the reglementary
period in the submission
thereof as stated in the
PRDP FMOM and existing
laws, rules and regulations.
(DA/PRDP/EHRDP/
SCHARMP; LBP/CADF)
b) Submit BRS and Monthly
Reports of Official Travels
and Fuel Consumption
within the timeframe
established by regulations;
and Coordinate with the
Government Service Banks
on the use of internet
banking facility, particularly
on its capability to access
and download statement of
accounts/bank statement
needed in the preparation of
BRS and use the prescribed
format provided in GAM
Volume II in the preparation
of BRS.
(DENR/FMP/INREMP;
DA/PRDP)
59
Audit Observations Recommendations
IA Project Amount
(Million P) Remarks
FMP
Not Indicated
CY 2017 DVs for the months of June and August to December 2017 for Fund 102-GOP; and May to December 2017 for Fund 102-LP, not yet submitted.
LBP
There was significant delay in the submission of the financial statements and supporting documents resulting in the late issuance of Audit Report for the year ended December 31, 2016, contrary to paragraph 2.06 (c) of the Annex to the CADF Grant Agreement and further affecting bank reputation. The Special Account Statement, Statement of Expenditures and Notes to Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2016 were submitted only on January 30, 2018.
3. Implementing agencies failed to revert back or remit collections and unused balances and interest income generated therefrom to the BTr.
Huge amounts of unutilized funds and collections were not reverted back or remitted by the concerned implementing agencies to the BTr and remained in their respective depositary accounts:
IA Project Amount
(Million P) Remarks
DA PRDP 0.325 NPCO and PSO Mindanao failed to comply on the mandatory remittance of various collections and refunds due to BTr.
1.539 Interest income was not remitted to the BTr by NPCO, PSOs Luzon B and Mindanao contrary to Section 65 of PD No. 1445.
DAR
ARCP II 48.731 DAR continued to maintain the General Control Fund (GCF) under Account No. 0702-1042-03 with an unbooked balance despite the absence of authority to maintain thereof from the Permanent Committee contrary to the Joint COA and DBM Circular No. 4-2012 dated September 11, 2012.
Management to require
concerned officials:
a) Accountants to deposit to the
BTr the unremitted
performance bond, other
refunds and interest income
generated therefrom and
from foreign currency
deposits. (DA/PRDP;
DENR/InREMP;
MDFO/NPS/ENREMP/MRD
P2 and LOGOFIND)
b) Revert back the balance of
the GCF Trust account to the
National Treasury.
(DAR/ARCP II)
c) NPMO to coordinate with
LBP on the status of cash
cards issued to beneficiaries
and make necessary actions
to recover the amount to be
remitted to the Btr; Expedite
the validation, investigation
60
Audit Observations Recommendations
IA Project Amount
(Million P) Remarks
DENR INREMP 0.202 Interests earned from foreign currency account deposits for CY 2017 were not remitted to the BTr.
MDFO NPS- ENRMP MRDP2 & LOGO-
FIND
108.571 Cash balances from proceeds from refunds of unexpended balances made by LGUs, unutilized cash balances from completed projects, and interests earned from three (3) completed projects not remitted to the BTr.
DSWD SPSP
5,385.00 Refunds from LBP conduits in CYs 2013 to 2017, representing unclaimed cash grants of 4Ps beneficiaries for OTC mode of payment, were not returned to the BTr pursuant to Section 88 of the General Provisions of the GAA.
DOH WHO 2.130 Unspent amount of P2.076 million and Interest Income in the amount of P55,428.09 was unreturned due to non-submission of accomplishment utilization reports for every biennium activities/project funded under WHO.
POPSTIRP
2.910 Unutilized cash balances of dormant accounts and interest income earned were not remitted to the BTr.
or re-assessment of the
eligibility of concerned
beneficiaries and fast tract
the implementation of the
resolution to address the
problem; Intensify
monitoring and follow-up of
beneficiaries by field
personnel and update the
data base for non-
compliant/delisted
beneficiaries; and Strictly
implement the NAC
Resolution No. 41, Series of
2017. (DSWD-SPSP)
d) Program Manager to
immediately coordinate with
the implementing agencies
to submit accomplishment
and/or utilization reports and
forward the same to the
Finance Staff for the proper
disposition of the unspent
cash balance of the previous
biennium. Also the Finance
Staff to immediately remit
the interest income to the
BTr. (DOH/WHO)
D. Compliance with Existing Laws, Rules and Regulations and Provisions of the MOA
1. Existing laws, rules and regulation were not observed
and/or complied with in the implementation of various
projects.
Further review of the documents by the concerned audit
teams disclosed the following:
IA Project Amount
(Million P) Remarks
DA
InfRES Not Indicated
Advances to PS-DBM sourced from InfRES project funds aged four to seven years were still outstanding in the books despite completion and closure of the project.
Management is required to:
a) Provide for the proper
disposition of the Due from
NGAs-PS (DBM) pertaining
to account balances of
completed projects.
(DA/InfRES)
b) PSO Mindanao to
consistently follow-up
liquidation of long overdue
CAs for travel from personnel
who are no longer connected
with the agency and exhaust
61
Audit Observations Recommendations
IA Project Amount
(Million P) Remarks
DA PRDP 0.610 Non-compliance with the guidelines pertaining to the grant, utilization, and liquidation of cash advances in PSO Mindanao resulting in the accumulation of unliquidated cash advances aged from 28 days to 579 days as of December 31, 2017.
Not Indicated
Out of nine implemented sub-projects of the PRDP, only two were liquidated thereby leaving seven unliquidated as of date contrary to COA Circular No. 94-013 due to delay in processing of liquidations. (Region 5, Sorsogon)
Various deficiencies were noted in the liquidation reports submitted by Proponent Groups contrary to pertinent accounting rules and other financial requirements mentioned in the
Not Indicated
PRDP-IREAP Financial Management Operations Guidelines. (Region 5, Sorsogon)
15.541 Despite purchase and utilization of 12 motor vehicles for NPCO and PSO Luzon B, no markings of “For Official Use Only” were seen on these units, contrary to COA Circular No. 75-6 dated November 7, 1975
11.149 The PPE accounts of NPCO, PSO Luzon B and RPCO V were not insured with the GSIS or any financially sound and reputable insurance companies against damage or loss through theft, fire and other fortuitous events, which is not in consonance with RA No. 656 or the Property Insurance Law as amended by PD No. 245 dated July 13, 1973.
Not Indicated
PRDP Accountable/ Property Officers accountable for the various PPE were not properly bonded, contrary to Treasury Circular No. 02-2009 dated August 6, 2009.
all means to settle the
unliquidated balance; Stop
the practice of treating
special purpose CA as petty
operating expenses under
regular CAs; Instruct
Accountant to verify
accountable officer’s
liquidation reports (LRs) and
either record these within 10
days upon receipt if
complete; demand
immediate submission of
lacking documents to enable
drawing of entries for
liquidation; Stop the grant of
additional CAs unless the
previous CA is settled or a
proper accounting thereof is
made; Direct all AOs to
liquidate CAs within the
prescribed period, and at the
end of the year; and Instruct
the Accountant to require all
AOs to use the RCD form in
liquidating special CAs.
(DA/PRDP)
c) NPCO and PSO Luzon B to:
Provide explanation for the
failure to procure the
required stickers/ prescribed
markings for all the PRDP
motor vehicles; Submit
definite timeline for the
procurement of the
prescribed markings in
compliance with COA
Circular Nos. 75-6 and 75-
6a; and Submit report on the
follow-ups made by the
PRDP on the status of
unissued government vehicle
plates with the LTO.
(DA/PRDP)
62
Audit Observations Recommendations
IA Project Amount
(Million P) Remarks
DA PRDP
2.042 The withholding tax rate used in the payment of honorarium to part-time personnel for CYs 2016 and 2017 was only 10 percent contrary to the provisions prescribed under Revenue Regulations No. 10-2008 dated July 08, 2008 resulting in the under-withholding of tax amounting to P1.075 million and P0.967 million.
4.215 Withholding taxes on government payments in RPCO V and 4B, Oriental Mindoro were not remitted to the BIR within the period prescribed under Revenue Regulation No. 2-98.
4.215 The Withholding taxes on Value-Added Tax and Creditable Income Taxes Withheld-Expanded were not remitted within ten days following the end of the month contrary to BIR Revenue Regulation (RR) 4-2002 dated March 26, 2002
67.589 Non-compliance with laws, rules and regulations resulted in the total disallowances and suspensions in the audit of various transactions amounting to P70.696 million of which P3.107 million were settled, thereby, leaving an outstanding balance of P67.589 million. a. Non-compliance on the policy
on partial settlement of audit disallowances in NPCO, PSOs Luzon B and Mindanao – P6.094 million.
b. Non-settlement of resigned/separated consultants and DA personnel no longer assigned to NPCO, PSOs Luzon B and Mindanao – P4.615 million.
c. Low settlement of suspended accounts in RPCO V – 1.19%
Not Indicated
Settlement of audit disallowances with Notice of Finality of Decision (NFD) were not strictly complied and approved request for instalment payment enforced/
d) Direct the PAccO to prioritize
the processing of PRDP
liquidation reports to reflect
correct and timely events in
the financial reports to be
furnished to its oversight
agencies. (DA/PRDP)
e) Direct the PPMIU to train and
supervise adequately the
Proponent Groups on
financial requirements and
procedures to correct any
deficiencies in accomplishing
liquidation reports based on
accounting rules and
procedures including those
prescribed in the PRDP
manuals. (DA/PRDP)
f) Accountable Officers for all
PPE of NPCO, PSO Luzon B
and RPCO V in coordination
with the Accounting Division,
to facilitate the preparation
and submission of the list of
insurable PPEs for inclusion
in the annual work and
financial plan, so that the
necessary insurance
coverage for all the assets
can be applied with the GSIS
or other reputable insurance
companies. (DA/PRDP)
g) Accountable Officers to be
properly and sufficiently
bonded pursuant to existing
COA rules and regulations;
(DA/PRDP)
h) Accounting Office to (i)
submit proof of remittance of
the under withheld taxes to
BIR in excess of the
allowable statutory amount of
P82,000.00, as applicable;
63
Audit Observations Recommendations
IA Project Amount
(Million P) Remarks
DA PRDP implemented in violation to Section 7.1 of COA Circular 2009-006 dated September 15, 2009 and COA Resolution No. 2017-021 dated November 3, 2017. (Region II)
Project signages in PLGU Iloilo were not compliant and updated with the information required in Item 3.6.4 of the PRDP I-Build Operations Manual and COA Circular No. 2013-003, thus, deprive the people of information on matters of public concern and participation in the monitoring and validation of the efficiency of project implementation, contrary to the transparency and accountability principle on the use of public funds.
15.523 Interest earned from PRDP I-BUILD and I-REAP GOP Counterpart and Loan Proceeds Trust Funds were not transferred to the General Fund, contrary to Section 305(d) of RA No. 7160, otherwise known as the Local Government Code of 1991, thus, they were not considered as part of the local funds which are available for the payment of expenditures and obligations of the Municipality. (Region 4A, Quezon Province)
Not Indicated
Copy of the MOA was not provided to the PGS prior to fund transfer from PRDP and deposit of corresponding LGU counterpart contrary to COA Circular No. 2012-001. (Region 5, Sorsogon)
0.443 Salaries of several job order employees for the “Muyung Project” were inappropriately charged against the Local Counterpart, instead of the Grant, contrary to the approved project proposal and itemized budget, which could adversely affect the attainment of the goals and objectives of the project. (CAR-Ifugao)
and (ii) ensure that
appropriate withholding
taxes are deducted from any
payments in accordance with
the Revised Withholding Tax
Table/ schedule in the TRAIN
Law and to remit to BIR
within the prescribed period
starting CY 2018.
(DA/PRDP)
i) NPCO, PSO Luzon B and
Mindanao, RPCO V to
submit a request for
settlement of disallowances
on installment basis in
accordance with COA
Resolution No. 2017-021,
otherwise refund
immediately are unsettled
balances and enforce
settlement from
resigned/separated
employees by sending
demand letters; Take legal
actions to compel concerned
consultants to refund their
overdue liabilities and
consider withholding a
retention money equivalent
to one/half month
consultancy fee earned for
the first month of service to
compensate for any future
loss in case of AWOL or
similar instances; and Submit
complete supporting
documents of transactions
suspended in audit,
otherwise, initiate the
necessary administrative
and/or criminal action in case
of unjustified failure/refusal to
effect compliance with the
settlement of suspensions.
(DA/PRDP)
64
Audit Observations Recommendations
IA Project Amount
(Million P) Remarks
DFIMDP 2.703 BPI could not determine the employees/officials responsible or accountable for the various PPE recorded in the books sourced from DFIMDP funds as of December 31, 2017 due to the failure of the Property Officer to maintain the PAR, or formerly ARE.
DENR CBFMMP 1.202 PARs were not issued/renewed every three years and every time there is a change in accountability, thus, exposing the property to the risk of possible loss or misuse.
FMP
Not Indicated
Budget of at least five percent was not allocated for gender and development in the Work and Financial Plan for CY 2017, contrary to Section 37 A.2 of RA No. 9710 or the Magna Carta on Women (MCW) and its IRR.
0.062 Cash advances for traveling expenses of PENRO Iloilo amounting to P61,608.00 were not liquidated by the concerned accountable officers within the prescribed period resulting in the non-recording of traveling expenses in the period these were incurred.
DENR FMP- PENRO Ifugao
Not Indicated
Proper procurement process was not followed in the repair of vehicle and retention money was not deducted for warranty contrary to RA No. 9184.
DOH
EU-HSPSP II
243.613 Non-liquidation of fund transfer to Implementing Agencies (IAs), contrary to COA Circular No. 94-013 dated December 13, 1994.
WHO UNICEF
7.094 0.393
Fund transfer to nine implementing agencies remained unliquidated for six to nine months due to non-monitoring of project status by program managers.
DPWH
RIIDP 1.280 Unrecouped cash advances from completed projects. This should have been recouped from the progress billings of the contractor.
j) Enforce
compliance/settlement of the
audit disallowances and
comply strictly with the
provisions of COA Circular
2009-006 dated September
15, 2009 and COA
Resolution No. 2015-031
dated August 20, 2015, as
amended by COA Resolution
2017-021 dated November 3,
2017.
k) PPMIU to require the
Provincial Engineering Office
to ensure that all required
information in the Project
Signboard be provided and
updated; and in the
prescribed size that can be
clearly seen by the public.
(DA/PRDP)
l) Municipal Accountant to
effect the transfer of interest
income from CY 2015 to CY
2017 totaling P15,523.67 to
the General Fund and
prepare correcting entry to
reflect the interest income
earned on June 2017 in
relation to IREAP.
(DA/PRDP)
m) Direct the PPMIU to secure
immediately a copy of the
MOA from the DA to ensure
that PRDP transactions are
legal and valid. (DA/PRDP)
n) Charge the salaries of the
Administrative Officer and
Assistant against the grant
component instead of the
local counterpart of the
“Muyung Fund” pursuant to
65
Audit Observations Recommendations
IA Project Amount
(Million P) Remarks
This is outstanding for more than one year.
KC-NCDDP– ADB, WB, Additional Financing & JSDF Grant for CEDPPP
Not Indicated
The completed infrastructure projects under the KC-NCDDP, KC-NCDDP Additional Financing and JSDF-CDED SLP as of December 31, 2017 were not immediately made available in the agency’s website, contrary to Section 92 on Transparency in Infrastructure Projects per GAA, thus, depriving the right of the people to information on matters of public concerns at the least possible cost on public funds.
KC- NCDDP ADB & WB
5,109.00 The non-liquidation of fund transfers to various NGOs/POs and the pending/unrecorded liquidations with Community-Beneficiaries and KC-NCDDP Field Offices Finance resulted in the minimal settlements, long outstanding accounts, and accumulation of the account balance as at year-end contrary to Sections 5.3 and 5.4 of COA Circular No. 2007-001.
DSWD KC- NCDDP
448.357 Capital expenditures of infrastructure projects were categorized in the budget proposals of DSWD as MOOE instead of Capital Outlays, thus, capital expenditures were accounted as Subsidies-Others, contrary or inconsistent with the state policy on the preparation/ formulation of budget proposal that harmonize budgetary and accounting code classification of government expenditures.
4Ps 10,746.00 Funds transferred to the LBP of P183.357 billion for OTC payments to the 4Ps beneficiaries has unliquidated balance of P10.746 billion as of December 31, 2017, of which P4.655 billion or 43.32 percent represents fund transfers from CY 2012 to 2016, thus, not in keeping with Section V-B, paragraph 8 of DSWD and
the Grant Agreement and the
itemized budget; (DA/PRDP)
o) Property Officer to determine
the Accountable Officers who
are in possession of the PPE
procured under DFIMDP.
(DA/DFIMDP)
p) Issue PARs every time there
is change in accountability or
custodianship to actual users
of equipment and renew the
PARs issued to end-users
every three years thereafter
to properly establish
accountability over the use
and custody of the assets.
(DENR/CBFMMP)
q) Officials and employees
concerned to immediately
liquidate their cash advances
and see to it that all cash
advances are liquidated as
required upon return of
accountable officers to their
permanent official stations.
(DENR/FMP)
r) PENRO Ifugao to consider
disposing fully depreciated
vehicle and no longer
economical to maintain in
accordance with existing
regulations to avoid further
incurrence of expenses and
make representation with the
DBM for acquisition of a new
vehicle. (DENR/FMP-
PENRO Ifugao)
s) Accountant to draw adjusting
entries to reflect the correct
balance of the Due from
NGOs/POs and Financial
66
Audit Observations Recommendations
IA Project Amount
(Million P) Remarks
LBP MOA dated July 14, 2011.
DOTr CBRTP, NBACSEPP TADP, & LADP
75.19 Of the 2017 year-end aggregate balance of P535.45 million of accounts Due from NGAs, Due from GOCCs and Due from LGUs, 85.96 percent or P460.26 million was aged below one year and the 14.04 percent or P75.19 million had been outstanding for more than a year to over ten years. The liquidation of the 2016 ending balance of P88.99 million was registered at 15.50 percent or P13.80 million only as of 31 December 2017 due to dormancy of Due from GOCC and Due from NGAs prior years’ balances of P47.41 million and P10.47 million, respectively.
DAR IARCDSP 0.028 Withheld taxes of prior years were still not remitted to the BIR as of December 31, 2017, contrary to DOF, DBM and COA Joint Circular No. 1-2000.
Assistance accounts.
(DENR/ SCHARMP)
t) Project Manager/PMO to
exert all efforts by requiring
the IAs to immediately submit
liquidation/ utilization reports
as well as accomplishment
reports on funds transferred;
(DOH/EU-HSPSP II;
DOH/WHO/UNICEF)
u) Submit Inventory report of
PPEs and other documents
that form part of the phase-
out plan of the Project in
compliance with DO No.
2017-0238; Execute deed of
donation of completed
project to the recipient LGU
and coordinate with the
Accounting Division to record
partially/completed
infrastructure projects.
(DOH/ EU-HSPSP II)
v) Management to direct the
Chief Accountant to facilitate
the recoupment of advances
to contractors amounting to
P1,280,146.48 relative to
completed RIIDP contracts.
(DPWH/RIIDP)
w) FOs to issue demand letter to
organizations concerned
pursuant to the guidelines
set forth in COA
Memorandum No. 2017-010
and compel them to refund
the unliquidated amounts,
otherwise, file appropriate
legal action, if warranted;
Include in the MOA
stipulations, such as the
responsibility of the
concerned NGOs/POs to
67
Audit Observations Recommendations account and settle the funds
transferred and the legal
sanctions in case of failure to
liquidate the same; and
Require KC-Regional PMO
to fast track review and
evaluation of liquidation
documents for immediate
recording in the books.
(DSWD/KC-NCDDP-ADB &
WB)
x) DSWD FO No. XIII to prepare
its budget proposals for
capital expenditures on
infrastructure projects in
accordance with existing
budgetary policies so that
capital expenditures are
captured, from the time of
budget appropriation until
funds are disbursed, under
capital outlay accounts.
(DSWD/KC-NCDDP)
y) LBP to strictly adhere to the
provisions of the MOA and to
explain or justify the non-
release of needed cash for
the 4Ps beneficiaries, if
warranted. (DSWD/4Ps)
z) Monitor strictly the
compliance by the IAs with
the provisions of COA
Circular No. 94-013 and
MOAs on the timely
submission of liquidation
reports for fund transfers to
avoid long outstanding and
dormancy of balances of
Inter-Agency Receivables; In
cases where submission of
liquidation reports is already
nil, require the IAs to issue
certifications that the
projects funded out of the FT
68
Audit Observations Recommendations have been completed and
recognized in the books of
accounts, duly verified by
their respective COA
Auditors. These certifications
shall be used as supporting
documents in recording
liquidation in the DOTr
books; and Consider the
filing of a request for write-off
of dormant long outstanding
accounts with the COA
pursuant to COA Circular No.
2016-005 dated December
19, 2016. (DOTr/CBRTP,
NBACSEPP, TADP, &
LADP)
aa) Immediately cause the full
remittance to the BIR of all
unremitted withheld taxes
and review and analyze the
entries in the General
Ledger and prepare the
necessary adjustments.
(DAR/IARCDSP)
2. The provisions and/or requirements under the
Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) or
contract/project document or Project Operations
Manual were not strictly observed and/or not
complied with in the implementation of various
projects.
As reported by the concerned audit teams, certain
provisions in the MOA or contract/project document were
not observed in the implementation of the following
projects:
IA Project Amount
(Million P) Remarks
DA PRDP 0.253 The amount of P252,915.21 representing 10 percent counterpart of PLGU Ilocos Norte was not actually provided by MLGU Vintar, Ilocos Norte which is not in accordance with the prescribed cost-sharing stated in the IMA, thus the non-usage of the
Management is required to:
a) PLGU Ilocos Norte to
appropriate P252,915.21
representing its share for the
Solar Drying Pavements
sub-project as stated in the
IMA. (DA/PRDP)
b) Ensure the submission of
required reports within the
deadline set to enable the
Audit Team to promptly audit
and settle the agency’s
transactions and accounts.
(DA/PRDP)
c) Make representation with the
BTr for the necessary
amendment to the pertinent
69
Audit Observations Recommendations
IA Project Amount
(Million P) Remarks
said amount.
Not Indicated
Monthly, quarterly and annual report were not submitted to the Audit Team contrary to the I-Build Operations Manual and Financial Management Operations Manual of the PRDP. (CAR/Apayao)
DBP
EDP-NW
9.268 The MOA by and between the BTr and DBP was not revisited and amended as mutually agreed upon by both parties, particularly the computation by the Bank of FXRC claims from the BTr on foreign-denominated ODA borrowings that is not aligned with the pertinent provisions of the MOA, resulting in a net overclaim for CY 2017.
The Bank did not levy penalty for all 2017 payments of FRXC claims received after 10 banking days from the BTr receipt of the billing, contrary to the provisions of the MOA by and between the NG/BTr and the DBP.
LBP ACSP Not Indicated
The Revolving Fund Account for the Agricultural Credit Support Project was not established, thus, deviating from Section 6, Article III of the Loan Agreement between LBP and JICA. The LBP, instead, used its current fund pooling system with booking/tagging mechanism capable of monitoring fund movements. In principle, the requirements of Section 6(1) of the Loan Agreement is satisfied. JICA should defer the issuance of no objection to the request pending resolution of some matters with LBP.
NFA 1995 USPL Title I Program
Not Indicated
In CY 2017, NFA has complied with the terms and conditions on payment of the principal and interest provided in the MOA. Based on the letter of Commodity Credit Corporation (CCC) submitted by Management to the Audit Team, its record is reconciled with NFA’s books.
portion of the MOA treating
on the application of
exchange rates for the
computation of FXRC claims
based on mutual agreement
by both parties. (DBP/EDP-
NW)
d) Apply the provision of the
MOA on the imposition of
penalty for payments
received after 10 banking
days from BTr’s receipt of
DBP’s billing. (DBP/EDP-
NW)
e) Pursue with JICA the
approval of the existing fund
pooling system for the
booking and monitoring of
ACSP-funded accounts to
comply with the requirement
of Section 6(1) of the Loan
Agreement No. PH-P244.
(LBP-ACSP)
f) Obtain copies of documents
from the creditor evidencing
payments made on the loans
with the corresponding
interests. (NFA/ 1995 USPL
Title I Program)
70
Audit Observations Recommendations
IA Project Amount
(Million P) Remarks
However, the afore-mentioned letter is not sufficient as it is not considered official, even the information provided therein did not substantiate all the payments made by NFA.
E. Reliability of Financial Statements
The propriety and accuracy of FS accounts of various projects cannot be established due to inclusion of unserviceable PPE and/or exclusion of other accounts, unreconciled balances and errors in recording, among others.
As reported by the concerned Auditors, the financial records of the following projects were unreliable due to the following reasons:
IA & Project Accounts Amount
(Million P) Remarks
DA/ PRDP
PPE
0.091 Damaged PPE were not yet reported as unserviceable, not yet disposed and were still carried in the books of PSO Visayas.
2.694 Non-inclusion of PPE accounts in the RPCPPE of NPCO and PSO Visayas
CIB 103.173 Absence of BRS and Ledger in PSO Mindanao
Receivables-NDs/NCs
2.333 The Receivables – Disallowances/ Charges reported is doubtful due to the existence of an unreconciled amount. (Region II)
CIB-LCCA 28.465 Twenty-four (24) unreleased commercial checks at year end were not reverted back to the cash account as of December 31, 2017 thus, understated the Cash in Bank – Local Currency, Current Account as of December 31, 2017.
Due from LGUs & CIP
75.93 Expended fund transfer still outstanding in the receivable accounts of PSO Luzon B
8.766 Unadjusted and/or unreconciled variance between the balance per books and the results of confirmation of receivable accounts in PSO Luzon B
Accounts Payable & Other Payables
15.885 Overstated due to a misclassification of account and insufficiency of supporting documents to support the validity of some claims (Region II)
Due to NGAs
0.803 Non-maintenance of SL Due to National Government Agencies (NGAs) account.
Books vs FAR
29.069 85.388
Unreconciled amounts of obligation and disbursement between PRDP NPCO report and those presented in the
Management to require concerned officials to:
a) Prepare the Inventory and Inspection Report of Unserviceable Property and submit to the Accountant for the preparation of JEV to clear the PPE accounts from unserviceable property. (DA/PRDP/SHARMP; DENR/CB FMMP)
b) Conduct physical inventory
of all properties including unserviceable property for disposal; and prepare RPCPPE to include all PPE accounts in the NPCO and PSOs and to exclude all PPE transferred to the agencies. (Various Projects)
c) Request depositary bank to
release Bank Statement on time, and Accountant to prepare BRS and corresponding adjusting entries and to submit to COA for verification of the ending balances of cash accounts recorded in the books. (Various Projects)
d) Direct the Accountant to draw a JEV to recognize necessary adjustments and to draw a JEV at the end of each year to adjust the reversion of unreleased commercial checks to the cash account at year end
71
Audit Observations Recommendations
IA & Project Accounts Amount
(Million P) Remarks
Financial Accountability Report (FAR).
Inventory 0.287 Purchases of inventory items in NPCO and RPCO V were directly recognized as expense accounts contrary to the prescribed perpetual inventory item per Section 9, Chapter 8 of GAM for NGAs Volume I.
Not Indicated
Agricultural produce, supplies and materials purchased were not recorded first as inventories in the books of accounts resulting in ineffective control and misstatement of the financial statements. (CAR/Ifugao)
PPE 0.387 Irregular procurement of motorcycles
DA/ SCHARMP
Due from NGOs/ POs and Expense Account
3.350 Fund transfers treated as expense instead of recording as Due from NGOs/POs; thereby understating the account Due from NGOs/POs and overstating the expense account.
PPE 11.974 Equipment found during inspection of P0.117 million, unserviceable but remained in the books of accounts of P0.915 million equipment; and equipment transferred to other agencies which remained in the books costing P10.942 million
SCHARMP 3.350 Recorded directly as an expense instead of recording it as Due from
NGOs/POs, thereby understating the account Due from NGOs/POs and overstating the expense account
DA/ DFIMDP
PPE 2.047 Difference between property records of P12.272 million and accounting records of P10.225 million.
DA/ InfRES
Inventory 0.300 Overstated due to non-preparation of RSMI
0.264 Non-moving SL account balances since October 2014
PPE Not Indicated
Non-recording of Communication Equipment in the books of INFRES which are included in the RPCPPE and found during the physical count
DAR/ ARCP II
Receivable Accounts
11.300 Overstated due to non-reconciliation of balances with IAs; IAs not also compelled to submit liquidation reports within the prescribed period, thus, accumulating receivable balances.
Cash
Not Indicated
Non-submission of BRS for the GCF Trust Fund (Account No. 0702-1042-03) and FAPsO MDS with Account No. 2070-9015-04
Non-submission of the Statement of Comparison of Budget and Actual Amount
DAR/ ARCP II GOP and LP
PPE
12.167 Property and Equipment for Distribution and other Property Plant and Equipment (PPE) and the corresponding accumulated depreciation amounting to P1,006,663.12 were recognized in the
whenever applicable; Ensure that issuance of check and approval of related DVs are based on valid claims and duly supported with complete documentation. (DA/PRDP)
e) LGUs to fast track submission of liquidation documents to DA and other government agencies for the adjustment of account balance and for fair presentation in the books of the Due from LGUs and CIP accounts for I-Build Component and expense account for I-REAP Component.
f) Accounting and Budget Divisions to resolve the discrepancies of the fund utilization status report between the records of PRDP NPCO and in the FAR. (DA/PRDP)
g) Submit to the Accountant and to COA accurate and properly accomplished RPCPPE not later than January 31 of each year as prescribed in the GAM for NGAs. (Various Projects)
h) Accountant of NPCO and RPCO V to observe the proper accounting in the purchase of inventory items using the prescribed perpetual inventory system. (DA/PRDP)
i) Identify issues/difficulty in the submission or compliance with documentary requirements and provide technical assistance to LGUs as deemed necessary to the
72
Audit Observations Recommendations
IA & Project Accounts Amount
(Million P) Remarks
books under Fund 158 and Fund 102 ARCP II-GOP and LP despite the absence of supporting documents and actual receipt of PPE and crediting Subsidy from Central Office thus, affecting the reliability of the balance of the said accounts as of December 31, 2017. (Region IX)
DAR/ CONVERGE
CIB-LCCA 4.659 Unaccounted difference between book and bank balances and non-preparation of adjusting entry/ies to reflect the said variance.
Due from Central Office & Subsidy from Central Office
5.687 Recording in the books under Fund 102-ARCP II-LP & GOP, Fund 102- Project ConVERGE funding checks not yet received by debiting Due from Central Office and crediting Subsidy from Central Office, resulting in the overstatement/ misstatement of the said accounts as of December 31, 2017 (Region IX)
Due from Operating Unit (asset account); Training Expense; &
3.817
4.522
Transactions were recorded in the books despite the absence of appropriate basis for recognition of the same, resulting in the misstatements of Due from Operating Unit (asset account) of P3.817 million; Training
Payables 7.065 Expense (expense account) of P4.523 million and Payables as of December 31, 2017 of P7.065 million. (Region IX)
Payables; Expenses; & Asset Accounts
48.018 7.268 40.750
Transactions were recognized in the books under Fund 102 despite the absence of perfected contracts/POs and actual receipt of goods and services, resulting in the overstatement of expenses for the Payables and assets as of December 31, 2017.
DARPO- ZDS/ CONVERGE
Subsidy and Due from Central Office
49.412 Recognition in the books under Fund 102-Project Converge of Subsidy from Central Office without corresponding receipt of fund overstated Subsidy and Due from Central Office.
Payable Accounts
11.954 Recording of obligations under Fund 102-Project Converge for the procurement of farm inputs/hauling trucks in favor of the DARRO IX to avoid the lapsing and reversion of unused appropriation was not in keeping with Section 11 of the GAM- Volume I.
Due from Central Office & Subsidy from Central Office
32.778 The agency recorded in its books of accounts Subsidy from Central Office (Credit) for funding checks not yet received and debiting Due from Central Office under Fund 102-Project Converge based on verbal instruction from DAR Central Office, resulting in the overstatement of the said accounts as of December 31, 2017.
maximize availment of grants. (DAR/ARCP II)
j) Accountants to draw adjusting entries to restate beginning balances or correct erroneous entry and/or reflect correct balances of PPE and Cash in Bank accounts and all other affected accounts or reclassify account to appropriate account. (Various projects)
k) Prepare and regularly
update SLs including SLs for Due to NGAs, Advances to Contractors, CIP, and PPE to support the reported balances in the books of accounts. (Various Projects)
l) Accountant to reconcile with project personnel to determine the variance/unreconciled figures and disposition and propriety of, outstanding inventory items as well as analyze the non-moving subsidiary account balances and effect adjustments, if warranted. (DA/InfRES/PRDP)
m) Management adjust and
restate the beginning balances of the affected accounts as of January 1, 2018 to reflect the correct account balances. (DAR/ CONVERGE)
n) Ensure that obligations recorded are duly supported with documents as required under existing laws and regulations. (DA/CONVERGE)
o) Stop the practice of recording Subsidy Income
73
Audit Observations Recommendations
IA & Project Accounts Amount
(Million P) Remarks
DAR/ IARCDSP
Cash Not Indicated
Non-submission of the SCBAA and BRS for FAPsO MDS with Account No. 2070-9015-04
DAR/ MINSAAD
Consultancy Services
2.238 Understated Consultancy Services due to non-inclusion of the tax portions on payments of consultancy services
Duties, Taxes and Licenses
0 Overstated by the same amount due to recording of the tax portions as separate Taxes, Duties and Licenses expense
Travelling Expenses
0.039 Honoraria for the month of December 2017 recorded as Travelling Expenses.
Cash 163.432 Overstated Inter-agency Receivables Accounts due to non-reconciliation of balances with IAs and non-submission of liquidation reports within the prescribed period
DENR/ CBFMMP
PPE (Fund 102 and 171)
5.201 Absence of physical inventory and non-submission of the RPCPPE and IIRUP
CIP-LI and LI-RPs (Fund 102 and 171)
66.469 Completed projects not reclassified to the appropriate fixed asset account Land Improvement, Reforestation Projects before transferring the accounts to Fund 101
DENR/ FMP
Inventory 1.702 Unreconciled balance of P287,402.60 between the accounting and property records of Region II; and failure to conduct the physical count of inventories and to submit the RPCI in FMB and Region III
Fuel, Oil & Lubricants Expenses
Not Indicated
Non-submission of the Monthly Report of Official Travels and the Monthly Reports of Fuel Consumption. (Region 6, Iloilo)
Advances to Contractors
31.622 SLs not maintained in PENRO Iloilo, thus, reconciliation with the GL controlling account not possible
Office Equipment and ICTE
0.126 Absence of disclosure regarding the existence of one unit Nikon SLR D800 digital camera with complete accessories which was not returned by the former Assistant Secretary, FASPS and error in recording the digital camera under account Office Equipment instead of account Information and Communications Technology Equipment
DENR/ INREMP
CIB-LCCA 0.151 Unreconciled book and bank balances
DOH/ EU- HSPSPII
Inventory PPE
17.767 Non preparation of Report of Supplies and Materials (RSMI); and Property Transfer Form (PTR) for inventory issuances and property/asset transferred, as well as non-conduct of physical inventory count
CIP PPE
3.990 Completed and accepted birthing facility not yet reclassified/transferred to the appropriate PPE account
not yet received and require the Accountant to make an adjustment restating the balance of the account balances as at January 1, 2018. (DA/CONVERGE)
p) Instruct Budget Officer to prepare and submit the SCBAA to the Office of the Auditor for verification. (DAR/ARCP II/ IARCDSP)
q) Update the recording of liquidation reports submitted by the IAs; exert effort in reconciling the balances of the accounts with the IAs (NGAs and GOCCs); and Issue demand letters to concerned IAs to liquidate funds utilized or refund unutilized amount of completed projects. (DAR/ARCP II/MINSAAD)
r) Accountant to adhere to
applicable laws in the proper recording of transactions. (DAR/MINSAAD; DA/SCHARMP)
s) Request from the Implementing Agency/Contractor/End-users, submission of final report/required documents as basis for reclassifying the account CIP-Land Improvement to appropriate account. (AVIAN, 2WHSMP and BIP-RIOC401-NTCCO Phase II)
t) Exert efforts in retrieving the digital camera by sending demand letters to the former DENR official for the return of the equipment; Provide necessary disclosure in the Financial Statements regarding the status of the equipment, nature of prior
74
Audit Observations Recommendations
IA & Project Accounts Amount
(Million P) Remarks
16.064 Non-recording of partially and completed infrastructure project due to failure to prepare inventory of PPE
AVIAN, 2WHSMP and BIP- RIOC401- NTCCO
Inventory PPE
12.059 26.110
Non-preparation/maintenance/ submission of reports of issuances and non-proper turn-over of previous Property Officer, deterring also the closure of the books of accounts
Phase II CIP 9.449 Non-submission of Certificate of Completion by the IAs and Acceptance of the end-users of completed constructions projects
MWSS – NWSDP, UATP & MSSP
CIP 759.297 Completed projects not transferred to appropriate asset account and inclusion of unreconciled accounts
DOTr PPE 25.673 Errors/omissions in recording of transactions; non-conduct of physical count of properties; non-submission of Report on the Physical Count of (RPCPPE) and non-maintenance of PPE Ledger Cards (PPELCs)
DPWH NRIMP PII
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Not Indicated
Non-preparation of periodic BRS
POPSTIRP DPWH NRIMP
PPE 375.192 PPE accounts misclassified as Construction in Progress – Buildings and Other Structures
PII POPSTIRP
Intangible Assets
61.183 Recorded in the book at zero net book value for project G-07 Database Management System, computer software due to the practice of using an estimated useful life of five (5) years for its intangible assets
DPWH/ RIIDP
RUPP
CIP-IA 155,879.670 Due to various errors/omissions and existence of unreconciled balances amounting to P23.072 billion
PMRCIP PIII
NRIMP PII ARBP II
Accounts Payable
12,857.511 Due to non-reversion of long outstanding/ undocumented payables and unrecorded direct payment to contractors/ consultants by the FLI
FRMP MMICP VI CLLeX MPBSIP
Due to BIR 43.809 Unremitted taxes withheld and existence of negative SL balances representing amount remitted for taxes withheld without setting-up the account, double remittance of taxes withheld and amount still for reconciliation by the Accounting Division.
NIA PIDP
Various Accounts
136.14 Undisclosed prior period adjustments made to correct prior period errors which restated some account balances in CY 2015 in the Notes to Financial Statements contrary to Philippine Public Sector Accounting Standards (PPSAS) No. 3
Accum. Depreciation
7.66 Difference between the depreciation for the year presented in the Statement of Financial Performance (SFP) of P23.209 million and the amount of
period errors and amount of correction for each line item affected. (DENR/FMP)
u) Submit immediately the Monthly Report of Official Travels with the corresponding Reports of Fuel Consumption to the Audit Team for verification of the recorded Fuel, Oil & Lubricants Expenses and henceforth, within a reasonable period every month thereafter; and Advise the designated drivers of the agency to properly accomplish the trip tickets. (DENR/FMP)
v) Supply and Property Division to consistently/regularly prepare the RSMI and PTR for every issuance of inventories and transfer of properties. (DOH/EU-HSPSPII; DA/InFRES)
w) Review and analyze the cost
of completed projects and make necessary reclassification to the appropriate PPE accounts, supported with Certificate of Completion and Acceptance, and compute for the Accumulated Depreciation of the six Completed Projects from the year of completion. (Various Projects)
x) Chief Accountant to review the useful life of intangible assets at least each reporting period to determine if expectations differ from previous estimates in accordance with Section 11, Chapter 12, Volume I of the GAM. (DPWH/NRIMPPII)
y) Analyze and review non-moving SL accounts
75
Audit Observations Recommendations
IA & Project Accounts Amount
(Million P) Remarks
provision of depreciation presented in the Notes to Financial Statements No. 8 – PPE of P30.872 million. The variance indicates that an adjustment was made in the accumulated depreciation for CY 2015 but the balance was not restated
NIA PIDP
Various Accounts
233.73 Difference between the reported amounts of funds received, fund utilized and fund balance of P26.537 million, P132.120 million and P75.076 million, respectively, in the Statement of Sources and Application of Funds (SSAF) and in the Financial Statements; The Statement of Comparison of Budget and Actual Amount was also not prepared contrary to PPSAS No. 1
PPE 1,423.69 Non-inventory taking of PPE costing P37.346 million, variance of P27.07 million between the result of physical count and recorded PPE, non-allocation of overhead cost of P86.875 million to CIP and Water Systems accounts, and absence of documents to support the transfer of equipment in the amount of P34.164 million to NIA offices
CIB-LCCA 7.89 Non-submission of documents supporting the BRS, discrepancy between book balance and the corresponding bank statements, and non-adjustment of reconciling items. (Regions III, IV-B and XI)
including Payable Accounts and revert balances outstanding for two (2) years or more, undocumented and without valid/ actual claimants, pursuant to Section 98 of PD 1445 and EO 109 dated June 10, 1999; and make representation with the DBM, aside from sending follow-up letters, for immediate issuances of the NCAA to facilitate recording of direct payments made to contractors/ consultants. (DPWH/RIIDP, ARBP II, FRMP, MMICP VI, RUPP, CLLeX, MMPBSIP; DA/InFRES)
z) Remit amounts due to BIR;
Analyze and reconcile negative balances in SL accounts and review the records of taxes withheld/ remitted. (DPWH/ NRIMP PII CLLeX)
aa) Accounting Division of Central and Regional Offices to reconcile records with Foreign Loan Accounting Division (FLAD) and PIDP PMO and make necessary adjustments in the books of accounts and FLAD and PMO reports. FLAD and PMO to prepare statement of comparison of actual expenditures against the approved budget per project component. (NIA-Various accounts)
bb) Reconcile the depreciation
amount reflected in the SFP and the Notes to FS (NIA-Accumulated Depreciation).
cc) Allocate management fee and general engineering supervision and
76
Audit Observations Recommendations
administrative cost to various projects implemented; and
dd) Submit Invoice Receipts and PARs or AREs covering equipment transferred by CO to various NIA offices and Property Division to submit to Accounting Division certified true copies of Invoice Receipts for all assets transferred. (NIA-PIDP)
4.2 General Audit Recommendations
In view of the significance of the foregoing observations and the need for appropriate actions by the Implementing Agencies and oversight agencies, we recommend the following:
4.2.1 For the Implementing Agencies
Consider project readiness and ability to implement, own and maintain the project before submitting project design/proposal to ensure smooth implementation of the project and avoid delay and unnecessary commitment fees and other charges; Identify potential/actual problems and root causes of delays in project implementation using among others, the NEDA-PMS Quarterly Alert Mechanism Report and take necessary and appropriate measures to address the same; Exert best efforts to comply with loan conditionalities within the prescribed period/target date to facilitate project start-up activities; Strictly follow existing accounting and auditing rules and regulations on the grant, utilization and liquidation of cash advance/fund transfer to prevent accumulation of account balances; Maintain the required accounting records and reconcile reciprocal and related accounts including cash account and bank balances; Conduct regular physical inventory of supplies and equipment and reconcile accounting and property records.
4.2.2 For the Oversight Agencies
4.2.2.1 National Economic Development Authority
4.2.2.1.1 Sustain the review of necessity of projects, project design and implementation strategies, and absorptive capacity of implementing agencies to undertake and sustain/maintain; and
77
4.2.2.1.2 In the review of project feasibility studies, consider lessons learned
from similar projects as aid in determining project design deficiencies and viability of the project.
4.2.2.2 Department of Finance
4.2.2.2.1 Facilitate request for loan cancellation with the Foreign Funding
Institutions (FFIs) to minimize payment of commitment fees. Ensure that the amounts of loans contracted are necessary and can be absorbed by the IAs;
4.2.2.2.2 Institute a system where IAs are informed of commitment fees paid by
the NG due to delays in project implementation and require explanation from the IAs on the causes of delay; and
4.2.2.2.3 Establish effective networking among IAs, LGUs, DBM and other concerned agencies. Facilitate compliance with loan conditions to ensure loan effectiveness and timely completion of projects.
4.2.2.3 Department of Budget and Management
4.2.2.3.1 Ensure adequate and timely release of project funds, both loan/grant
proceeds and GOP counterpart funds;
4.2.2.3.2 Consider inclusion of debt service and commitment fees against implementing agencies’ budget for proper accountability and reporting of expenditures; and
4.2.2.3.3 Release immediately the Non-Cash Availment Authority to facilitate the recording of settlement of liabilities for goods delivered and services rendered.
4.3 Status of Implementation of Prior Years’ Audit Recommendations
Out of the 586 prior years’ (PYs) audit recommendations included in prior years’ Consolidated Annual Audit Reports of 32 National Government Agencies (NGAs), Government Owned and Controlled Corporations (GOCCs), and Local Government Units (LGUs), 250 or 43 percent were implemented, 188 or 32 percent were partially implemented or implementation in-progress, 66 or 11 percent were yet to be implemented, while status of implementation of 82 or 14 percent are still for verification, as presented in Table XXX.
78
Among the reasons cited for the partial or non-implementation of the audit recommendations are:
Failed biddings of projects; Fortuitous events like bad weather condition; Lack of manpower complement; Management’s inaction in effecting adjustments due to, among others,
incomplete turned-over documents or non-availability of documents, delayed preparation of completion reports, unsettled billings, non-creation of committee to conduct examination and verification of operator’s books of accounts;
Uncorrected weaknesses in existing processes and procedures; Unclean database and/or not updated data/information; Unclear guidelines and criteria in the selection of beneficiaries; Weak coordination between and among parties; Non-reconciliation of records; Delayed issuance by DBM of NCAA; Delayed/non-reconciliation of accounts or reconciliation in process; Non-disposal of unserviceable properties; Agencies plan to seek approval from DBM to utilize unused fund balances; Projects terminated; With pending issues with the Court and/or Arbitral Tribunal; Concerned employees no longer in the service or cannot be located; On-going adjustments of subsidiary ledger; Contractor’s inaction; Non-issuance of demand letters on due and demandable accounts; Delayed and/or non-submission of financial statements, and other financial and
operational reports, and documentary requirements including liquidation reports despite notices and constant follow-ups;
Slow procurement process and Road Right of Way (ROW) issues and concerns; Ownership/acquisition issues and concerns;