efm- data rate analysis

22
EFM- Data rate analysis Part I: upper-bound channel capacity Ikanos: Behrooz Rezvani, Sam Heidari Alcatel: Thierry Pollet, Michael Beck Globespan: Massimo Sorbara ST Micro: Christophe Del Toso Marvell: Runsheng He, Nersi Nazari John Cioffi: Stanford University Gord Ressies: Zarlink Contact: [email protected]

Upload: others

Post on 22-Feb-2022

8 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

EFM- Data rate analysisPart I: upper-bound channel capacity

Ikanos: Behrooz Rezvani, Sam HeidariAlcatel: Thierry Pollet, Michael BeckGlobespan: Massimo SorbaraST Micro: Christophe Del TosoMarvell: Runsheng He, Nersi NazariJohn Cioffi: Stanford UniversityGord Ressies: Zarlink

Contact: [email protected]

Copper Channel Capacity and Applications

n Copper channel capacity = Economicsn Maximum rate

n Metro Fiber extension- I.e E-PON, FTTC, etc. for the last 1-2 kft is very expensive

n Desired full capacity (upstream+downstream)n 100 Mbps – Fast Ethernet applications

n Maximum reachn 6+ kft reach covers Majority of businesses within USA

and most of loops in Europe/Japan/Int. n Desired full capacity (upstream+downstream)

n 10+ Mbps – Ethernet application

n Using the Spectrum up to 12 MHz

Channel Capacity Issues

n Reference Channel noisen Spectral Compatibility issuesn Cross-talk (FEXT and NEXT)n Ham Channel n RFI ingressn Bridge-Tapsn Advanced error control codes

Spectral Compatibility

n Compatibility below 1.1 MHz: T1.417n POTS and Voicegrade services, EBS, DDSn ISDNn HDSL, HDSL2, SHDSLn ADSLn 2B1Q SDSL

n Compatibility beyond 1.1 MHzn Different frequency plans have been approved by

standards bodies: 998, 997.

Reed Solomon coding and other advanced coding architectures

n RS codes have about 3 dB coding gainn Concatenated RS+Trellis codes results to about 5.5

dB coding gain. n This method had been used extensively in ADSL modems.

The encoder is very simple and it is a 4D Wei code.

n Turbo code potentially has a high coding gain (7 dB). Advanced coding schemes (Turbo, LDPC) have been discussed very actively at ITU-Tn Turbo code has been used in wireless/OFDM applications

A potential programmable Turbo Trellis Architecture

IFFT

MapperFast Tones

Option: Trellis

Mapper

Interleavedpathand

TTCMTones

π_π_11

Data

RSC-1

RSC-2

Puncture

Delay

fast bits

π_π_22

Turbo Encoder

Psudo-Random

PermutationBlock

RSEncoder

DelayInterleaved path

Proposed EFM System

n Utilizing most of the existing VDSL standardsn Well understoodn Faster Time to Market

n Programmable Frequency Plan, Spectrally compliant with:n In public network, all existing systems including

VDSL 998/997n In MxU applications, with services below 1.1 MHz

Potential Spectrally FriendlyProgrammable PSD

998 BA:

997 BA:

12

D U D UU

-40 dBm/Hz

-60 dBm/Hz

0.025 0.3 0.5

-70 dBm/Hz

3.75 5.2 8.5 MHz

0.025 0.3 0.5 3.00 5.1 7.0 12 MHz

Symmetric rate vs. distance with 14, 11,and 8 bits/sec/Hz maximum

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

0 1 2 3 4 5 6

distance (kft)

Th

rou

gh

pu

t (M

bp

s)

14bits/sec/Hz

11bits/sec/Hz

8bits/sec/Hz

• -140 dBm/Hz AWGN

• 20 equivalent length self FEXT

• 7 dB coding gain

• 24 awg

Rate vs distance for separate bandsMaximum of 14 bits/sec/Hz

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

0 1 2 3 4 5 6

distance (kft)

Th

rou

gh

pu

t (M

bp

s)

25-300 & 300-500 kHz band

3.75MHz-5.2MHz band

8.5MHz-12MHz band

500kHz-3.75MHz band

5.2MHz-8.5MHz band

• -140 dBm/Hz AWGN

• 20 equivalent length self FEXT

• 7 dB coding gain

•Maximum of 14 bits/sec/Hz

•24 awg

Rate vs distance for separate bandsMaximum of 8 bits/sec/Hz

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

0 1 2 3 4 5 6

distance (kft)

Th

rou

gh

pu

t (M

bp

s)

25-300 & 300-500 kHz band

3.75MHz-5.2MHz band

8.5MHz-12MHz band

500kHz-3.75MHz band

5.2MHz-8.5MHz band

• -140 dBm/Hz AWGN

• 20 equivalent length self FEXT

• 7 dB coding gain

•Maximum of 8 bits/sec/Hz

•24 awg

Symmetric rate vs distance for cancellation 4dB of FEXT cancellation

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

0 1 2 3 4 5 6

distance (kft)

Th

rou

gh

pu

t (M

bp

s)

no FEXTcancellation

with FEXTcancellation

• -140 dBm/Hz AWGN

• 20 equivalent length self FEXT

• 7 dB coding gain

•Maximum of 14 bits/sec/Hz

•24 awg

Upstream rate for 2 different methods of UPBO

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

0 1 2 3 4 5 6

distance (kft)

Th

rou

gh

pu

t (M

bp

s) no PBO

freqdependentPBO1

freqdependentPBO2

• -140 dBm/Hz AWGN

• Uniformly distributed FEXT disturbers

• 7 dB coding gain

•Maximum of 14 bits/sec/Hz

•24 awg

Symmetric rate vs. distance for various maximum bits/sec/Hz

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

0 1 2 3 4 5 6

distance (kft)

Th

rou

gh

pu

t (M

bp

s)

14bits/sec/Hz

11bits/sec/Hz

8bits/sec/Hz

• -140 dBm/Hz AWGN

• 20 equivalent length self FEXT

• 5.5 dB coding gain

• 24 awg

Rate vs distance for different bands

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

0 1 2 3 4 5 6

distance (kft)

Th

rou

gh

pu

t (M

bp

s)

25-300 & 300-500 kHz band

3.75MHz-5.2MHz band

8.5MHz-12MHz band

500kHz-3.75MHz band

5.2MHz-8.5MHz band

• -140 dBm/Hz AWGN

• 20 equivalent length self FEXT

• 5.5 dB coding gain

•Maximum of 14 bits/sec/Hz

•24 awg

Rate vs distance for different bands

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

0 1 2 3 4 5 6

distance (kft)

Th

rou

gh

pu

t (M

bp

s)

25-300 & 300-500 kHz band

3.75MHz-5.2MHz band

8.5MHz-12MHz band

500kHz-3.75MHz band

5.2MHz-8.5MHz band

• -140 dBm/Hz AWGN

• 20 equivalent length self FEXT

• 5.5 dB coding gain

•Maximum of 8 bits/sec/Hz

•24 awg

Symmetric rate with 4dB of FEXT cancellation

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

0 1 2 3 4 5 6

distance (kft)

Th

rou

gh

pu

t (M

bp

s)

WithoutFEXTCancellation

With FEXTcancellation

• -140 dBm/Hz AWGN

• 20 equivalent length self FEXT

• 5.5 dB coding gain

•Maximum of 14 bits/sec/Hz

•24 awg

Upstream rate utilizing 2 different methods of UPBO

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

0 1 2 3 4 5 6

distance (kft)

Th

rou

gh

pu

t (M

bp

s)

no PBO

freqdependentPBO1

freqdependentPBO2

• -140 dBm/Hz AWGN

• Uniformly distributed FEXT disturbers

• 5.5 dB coding gain

•Maximum of 14 bits/sec/Hz

•24 awg

Non-stationary noise and Network capacity, FDD Vs TDD

n TDD must Synchronize the frames across all systems in a cable

n TDD is more vulnerable to the effects of a single line losing sync

n TDD has more latency (delay for buffering data until next ping-pong cycle)

n TDD signal is cyclo-stationary n TDD is less flexible for Symmetric vs Asymmetric

services co-existence.

Power Back-Off (PBO)

n UPBO is employed to provide spectral compatibility between loops of different lengths deployed in the same binder

n Equations used in PBO are as follows: 2***),(* fkDDfILPSDPSD coupNDFEXT NN

=Where, DN is the disturbers distance and N=0, 1, …, nk: FEXT constantf: frequency in Hz.

And

<

=otherwisePSD

DDDfILPSDPSD refNadj

DN ,

,),(*

max

2max

=otherwiseD

DDDD

N

UOINUOIcoup ,

,

Where,PSDmax is given as –60 dBm/HzDadj is Dref – DN. Note that DN coul d refer to a user or a disturberDcoup is the effective coupling path between the UOI and the disturber who is causing the FEXT.DUOI is the user of interest distance.

4

4

D adj = D ref - D 2

4

4 User @distance1 =D 1

Reference length= D ref

User @distance2 =D 2

User @distance n = D n

4 User @distance0 =D 0

4

4

D adj = D ref - D 2

4

4 User @distance1 =D 1

Reference length= D ref

User @distance2 =D 2

User @distance n = D n

4 User @distance0 =D 0

COST: One Line card, all PSD band options.

n One linecard supports all frequency plansn Simple or no discrete front-end filteringn Programmable Frequency or Time domain

multiplexingn FDD – allocate bandwidth to upstream and downstream

by use of provisioning software for each application

Recommended Specification based on current state of technology

n Long Reach and High performance EFM with maximum data-rate of 100 Mbps totaln Maximum reach of 6 kft and minimum data rate of 10+ Mbits totaln Maximum bandwidth of 12 MHz with option to support up to 14 bits/sec/Hz capacity

n Flexible spectral shaping with variable bandwidth for downstream and upstream band allocationn Utilizing most of the existing VDSL standardsn Well understoodn Faster Time to Marketn Programmable Frequency Plan, Spectrally compliant with:

n In public network, all existing systems including VDSL 998/997n In MxU applications, with services below 1.1 MHz

n Low complexity discrete front-endn Will reduce costn Allows flexible spectral shaping

n Turbo and or trellis coding in conjunction with RS codingn Frequency dependant PBO for maximum bundle capacity is preferred