february 25, 2014 kim field and brian jones uoit educ 5205g

20
February 25, 2014 Kim Field and Brian Jones UOIT EDUC 5205G

Upload: knox

Post on 23-Feb-2016

38 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

February 25, 2014 Kim Field and Brian Jones UOIT EDUC 5205G. KIDS ONLINE. Who, What & When?. Sonia Livingstone, Leslie Haddon, Anke Gorzig and Kjartan Olafsson with members of the EDU Kids Online Network - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: February 25, 2014 Kim Field and Brian Jones UOIT EDUC 5205G

February 25, 2014Kim Field and Brian JonesUOIT EDUC 5205G

Page 2: February 25, 2014 Kim Field and Brian Jones UOIT EDUC 5205G

Who, What & When?Sonia Livingstone, Leslie Haddon, Anke

Gorzig and Kjartan Olafsson with members of the EDU Kids Online

Network

Over 25 000 face-to-face interviews with European children and their parents

in 25 countries

2009 to 2011

KIDS ONLINE

Page 3: February 25, 2014 Kim Field and Brian Jones UOIT EDUC 5205G

Why?❖ To provide a rigorous

evidence base to support stakeholders in their efforts to maximise online opportunities for children while minimizing the risk of harm associated with internet use

KIDS ONLINE

Page 4: February 25, 2014 Kim Field and Brian Jones UOIT EDUC 5205G

Because...KIDS ONLINE

❖ Going online is thoroughly embedded in children’s lives

❖ internet use is increasingly individualised,

privatised & mobile ❖ 9-10 year old internet users spend an

average of 58 minutes online per day

❖ 15-16 year old internet users spend an average of 118 minutes online per day

Page 5: February 25, 2014 Kim Field and Brian Jones UOIT EDUC 5205G

Opportunities & Risks

KIDS ONLINE

OPPORTUNITIES RISK

OPPORTUNITIESRISK

Page 6: February 25, 2014 Kim Field and Brian Jones UOIT EDUC 5205G

The Balancing ActKIDS ONLINE

Page 7: February 25, 2014 Kim Field and Brian Jones UOIT EDUC 5205G

Online Opportunities

INCREASED OPPORTUNITIES

=experimenting with

relationships, intimacy & identity

VITAL to growing up & learning to cope in the

adult world

KIDS ONLINE

BUT

INCREASED OPPORTUNITIES

=linked to vulnerability &

the potential for harm

Page 8: February 25, 2014 Kim Field and Brian Jones UOIT EDUC 5205G

KIDS ONLINE

Risks vs Harm

4 MAIN RISKS:1.Seeing sexual images2.Receiving sexual

messages3.Being bullied4.Meeting online contacts

offline

HARM: ❖ the child’s

self-report of how bothered or upset they felt

Page 9: February 25, 2014 Kim Field and Brian Jones UOIT EDUC 5205G

KIDS ONLINE

Sexual Images & Sexual Messages

❖ 14% of 9-16 year olds have seen sexual images online BUT… only ¼ of these were upset (40% of their parents are unaware)

❖ 11% of 11-16 year olds have seen nudity online❖ 8% of 11-16 year olds have seen someone having sex online❖ 8% of 11-16 year olds have seen genitals online❖ 2% of 11-16 year olds have seen violent sex online❖ 2% of 11-16 year olds have been asked to talk about sexual acts online❖ 2% of 11-16 year olds have been asked for an image of their genitals online❖ 15% of 11-16 year olds have received sexual messages on their mobile devices

BUT… only ¼ of these were upset by this (52% of their parents are unaware)

❖ 3% of 11-16 year olds have sent sexual messages to someone online❖ more older children report exposure to sexual content &more males have seen

sexual images BUT… younger children and females are more upset by it❖ a child more who encounters risks offline is more likely to encounter risks online

Page 10: February 25, 2014 Kim Field and Brian Jones UOIT EDUC 5205G

KIDS ONLINE

Sexual Images & Sexual Messages

? These statistics, if replicated today would be similar/the same?

? Parents of 11-16 yrs are generally unaware of the extent of the sexual images their children have seen online ?

? Low percentages of 11-16 yrs admit actually being upset by online sexual images and messages. It follows then, that when these images or messages are not directly connected to them that they don’t see it as harmful ?

? Online Sexual images are easily accessible in schools ?

? 11-16 years olds have little apprehension about sending sexual images of themselves to someone they think they can trust ?

Comments?

Page 11: February 25, 2014 Kim Field and Brian Jones UOIT EDUC 5205G

KIDS ONLINE Online Bullying❖ 6% of 9-16yrs olds report having been bullied online❖ 3% of 9-16yrs olds report having bullied other online❖ 56% of online bullies say they have also bullied people

off-line❖ 55% of online bully victims report being bullied off-line❖ Those who do not bully others report not being bullied by

others off-line or online❖ Girls reported being more upset by online bullying than

boys❖ 36% of online victims of bullying try to fix the situation

themselves❖ 77% of online victims of bullying tell someone (a friend or

a parent)❖ 46% of online victims block the person sending the

hurtful messages

What does the EU Kids Online survey tell us?

Page 12: February 25, 2014 Kim Field and Brian Jones UOIT EDUC 5205G

KIDS ONLINE Online Bullying

? These statistics, if replicated today would be similar/the same?

? There is little connection between whether a person who is a bully online is also a bully off-line ?

? It is easier to be a bully online ?

? In your experience, young people who are not victims of bullying are also not bullies?

Comments?

What does the EU Kids Online survey tell us?

Page 13: February 25, 2014 Kim Field and Brian Jones UOIT EDUC 5205G

KIDS ONLINE

Meeting New Contacts Online

❖ 50% of 11-16yrs old find it easier to be themselves online than face-to-face❖ 87% of 11-16yrs olds are in touch with people online that they have met in

person first❖ 30% of 11-16yrs olds are in touch with people online who they have not met

face-to-face❖ 9% have gone to an off-line meeting with someone they met online for the first

time❖ 48% of 11-16yrs old who have met a person off-line (whom they met online) meet

a person not connected to their life previous to their online connection❖ 61% of of 11-16yrs old who have met a person off-line (whom they met online)

have parents who are unaware of this meeting❖ In an adult’s view, young people “meeting strangers on-line” is a risk❖ In a young person’s view, “meeting new friends on-line” is an opportunity.❖ Some young people who meet a person off-line whom they met online are:

sensation seekers, engagers of risky behaviour both on-line and off-line & have parents/guardians who place fewer restrictions on their internet use.

❖ 11% of 11-16yrs who met someone off-line (whom they met online) were bothered or upset by what happened (they were also more likely to be younger, have psychological difficulties and tended to be more vulnerable children

Page 14: February 25, 2014 Kim Field and Brian Jones UOIT EDUC 5205G

KIDS ONLINE

Meeting New Contacts Online

? As adults, meeting people off-line whom you’ve met online is risky ?

? As young people, meeting people off-line who you’ve met online is risky?

? As adults, meeting people on-line is an opportunity?

? As young people, meeting strangers on-line is an opportunity?

? As adults, meeting strangers on-line is risky?

Comments?

Page 15: February 25, 2014 Kim Field and Brian Jones UOIT EDUC 5205G

Predator’s Playground

http://www.ctvnews.ca/video?clipId=292096

❖ Next steps?❖ What can we do?

(Parent, Teacher, Administrator, Policy Maker etc.)

Page 16: February 25, 2014 Kim Field and Brian Jones UOIT EDUC 5205G

Policy Implications

Bullying: 1) Anti-bullying initiatives should be included in the promotion of internet use 2) on-line and off-line bullying is related and victims find it hard to escape 3) bullies have been victims themselves 4) education is needed because fewer than half tell another adult and fewer than half know how to block the person or delete their messages

Online Use: 1) Privatized (private locations); therefore, hard to supervise 2) restrict the internet vs finding other activities to do (inside and outside the home)

Social networking: 1)Privacy/safety settings are not user-friendly, 2)age restrictions can not be monitored

Contacts on line: 1) Parents’ awareness of what their child is up to is key

Page 17: February 25, 2014 Kim Field and Brian Jones UOIT EDUC 5205G

Recommendations Page 44/45 (Government, Industry, Awareness-raising, Children, Educators, Child Welfare, & Civil

Society)

A)Schools should take major responsibility for supporting children and their parents in gaining digital literacy and safety skills

B) Digital literacy and safety skills should be woven into curriculum

C) Expose children to a wider diversity of online activities while teaching critical literacy and safety skills

D)Children will tell peers when something upsets them, therefore schools should focus on peer mentoring.

EDU

CAT

OR

S

Page 18: February 25, 2014 Kim Field and Brian Jones UOIT EDUC 5205G

KIDS ONLINE Newer Risks

USER-GENERATED CONTENT

• Hate sites• Pro-anorexic sites• Non-suicidal self-harm

sites• Drug forums• Suicide sites PERSONAL DATA MISUSE

• Identity theft• Personal information abuse• Financial cheating

Page 19: February 25, 2014 Kim Field and Brian Jones UOIT EDUC 5205G

What children do onlinethe “ladder of opportunities”

school work & games100% of children

75% of children

86% of children

56% of children

23% of children

add watching video clips for information & entertainment

add interactivity (social networking, instant messaging & email)

add downloading films & music and sharing content via webcam or message boards

add visiting chat rooms, file-sharing, blogging and spending time in a virtual world

KIDS ONLINE

Page 20: February 25, 2014 Kim Field and Brian Jones UOIT EDUC 5205G