lab group presentation

Upload: shabi-aziz

Post on 06-Apr-2018

223 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/2/2019 LAB Group Presentation

    1/11

    Presentation on

    COMPETITION ACT 2002

    Prepared By

    Group 13

    Shabi Aziz (49)

    Hussain Ahmed (47)

  • 8/2/2019 LAB Group Presentation

    2/11

    COMPETITION ACT, 2002

    The Competition Act, 2002 came into existence in January2003.

    However, the Act could not be notified due to legal hassles.

    Finally, the Parliament in September, 2007 passed the

    Competition (Amendment) Act, 2007 and the Act becameoperational.

    CCI (Competition Commission of India)came into existenceon 1st March, 2009.

    Provisions were notified on May 20, 2009. The provisions relating to Combinations were notified w.e.f

    1st of June, 2011.

  • 8/2/2019 LAB Group Presentation

    3/11

    PREAMBLE OF COMPETITION ACT,2002

    To prevent practices having adverse effect oncompetition.

    To promote and sustain competition in markets.

    To protect the interests of consumers.

    To ensure freedom of trade carried on by otherparticipants in markets in India.

  • 8/2/2019 LAB Group Presentation

    4/11

    Properties of the Act

    The Act deals with following kind of agreements.Horizontal Agreements

    Agreement to limit production and/or supply;

    Agreement to allocate markets;

    Agreement to fix price;

    Bid rigging or collusive bidding;

    Vertical Agreements

    Tie-in arrangement;

    Exclusive supply / distribution arrangement;

    Resale price maintenance;

    Refusal to deal.

  • 8/2/2019 LAB Group Presentation

    5/11

    ABUSE OF DOMINANCE

    Abuse of dominant position includes: Imposing unfair conditions or price.

    Predatory pricing.

    Limiting production/market or technicaldevelopment.

    Creating barriers to entry.

    Applying dissimilar conditions to similar transactions.

    Denying market access, and

    Using dominant position in one market to gainadvantages in another market.

  • 8/2/2019 LAB Group Presentation

    6/11

    6

    Combinations

    MRTP Act

    Provisions of the MRTP Act regarding registration ofundertakings, establishment of new undertakings, take-

    overs, mergers and amalgamation were criticized on theground that they were based on an impractical anduntenable proposition that BIG is BAD

    Ultimately, these provisions were repealed in 1991

  • 8/2/2019 LAB Group Presentation

    7/11

    7

    Combinations

    Competition Act The Competition Act seeks to regulate any acquisition,

    acquiring of control, mergers or amalgamations if itresults in assets or turnover exceeding specified monetarylimits

    Concept of voluntary notice is introduced. On receipt ofsuch notice, Competition Commission can inquire and approve the combination, or

    direct that the combination shall not take effect, or

    propose modifications

    If no such Order is passed within a time-bound frame, thecombination is DEEMED TO HAVE BEEN APPROVED.

  • 8/2/2019 LAB Group Presentation

    8/11

    8

    Combinations

    Powers of Competition Commission

    It can :

    issue a Show Cause Notice to the parties

    direct the parties to publish details of the combination invite members of the public to file written objections

    pass appropriate Orders

    Two questions are worth considering :

    Is this just a back-door entry of earlier provisions of the MRTP Act?

    Will monetary limits fixed five years ago remain relevant fiveyears hence ?

  • 8/2/2019 LAB Group Presentation

    9/11

    9

    Case Studies

    Columbia AVIANCA, Columbias largest airline planned a merger with

    the countrys second largest airline, ACE.

    Justifications given for the merger were :

    AVIANCA had huge accumulated losses, and the mergerwould be a potential answer to its financial problems The merged airline could effectively compete with foreign

    carriers in the international market HELD : Merger would be anti-competitive : The merged

    airline would be FOUR times the size of its nearest domesticrival.

  • 8/2/2019 LAB Group Presentation

    10/11

    Case on Competition Act

    http://mrtpc2.pdf/http://mrtpc2.pdf/
  • 8/2/2019 LAB Group Presentation

    11/11

    Thank You