research methodology in market microstructure kee h. chung state university of new york at buffalo

214
Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Upload: sibyl-richards

Post on 27-Dec-2015

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Research Methodology in Market Microstructure

Kee H. Chung

State University of New York

at Buffalo

Page 2: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

What is market microstructure?

Traditional asset pricing aims to understand what should be the price of a security.

It does not, however, address how prices adjust to reflect news.

Nor does it explain how investors’ subjective assessment of a security “get into” the price.

Page 3: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

In practice, news and investors’ valuations are incorporated into security prices through trading.

This means that the specific trading rules, and the strategies traders develop in response to these rules, will affect how asset prices change over time in response to new information.

Page 4: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

“Market microstructure is the study of the process and outcomes of exchanging assets under explicit trading rules.” (Maureen O’Hara, a former president of the American Finance Association)

Market microstructure has a profound impact on the real world – on traders, broker/dealers, exchanges, regulators, and policy makers alike.

Page 5: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Why do we care?

Data guided by theory, theory guided by data

Market design issuesAgency auction marketDealer marketElectronic limit order books

Page 6: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Market performance issues• Transaction costs• Shock absorption/resiliency• Trading halts

Efficiency – welfare issues• Is insider trading bad?

Page 7: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo
Page 8: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Topics to be covered

Part I: Foundation and ProtocolsOrders and order propertiesMarket structureOrder-driven marketsDealer markets

Page 9: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Part II: Analytics and ModelsInformed trading and market efficiency Bid-ask spreadsMeasurement of trading (execution) costAdverse selection modelsSpread component models

Page 10: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Part III: Select Topics Trade classification Nasdaq controversy, stock price clustering,

and SEC market reforms Order preferencing Market structure and execution costs High frequency trading (HFT) Market segmentation: Efficiency vs

competition Minimum price variation (tick size) and

decimalization

Page 11: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Part III: Select Topics (Continued) Competition in dealer market Intraday patterns and test of alternative

theories Spread and depth: Joint decision variables Trades, information, and prices Commonality in liquidity Liquidity and asset pricing Market microstructure and interactions with

other areas

Page 12: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Chapter 4 Orders and Order

Properties

Page 13: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Orders Orders are instructions to trade that

traders give to brokers and exchanges that arrange their trades.

Orders always specify• The security to be traded• The quantity to be traded• The side of the order (buy or sell)

Page 14: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Orders may specify• Price specifications• How long the order is valid• When the order can be executed• Whether they can be partially filled or not

Page 15: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Who uses orders? Traders that either do not have direct

access to the markets, or do not have the time to monitor the markets use orders.• Have to anticipate what is going to happen.• Have to clearly delineate contingencies. Use

standard orders to avoid mistakes.

Page 16: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Traders who use orders are at a disadvantage vis-à-vis professional traders.

• Risk of misunderstandings• Conflicts of interest• Speed of reaction to changing market

conditions• Cancellations can be time consuming• Access to order flow information

Page 17: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Some important terms 1

Bid: buy order specifying a price (price is called the bid).

Offer: sell order specifying a price (price is called offer or ask).

Best Bid: standing buy order that bids the highest price bid.

Best offer: standing sell order that has the lowest price offer.

Page 18: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Some important terms 2

Dealers have an obligation to continuously quote bids and offers, and the associated sizes (number of shares), when they are registered market markers for the stock.

Their quotes also have to be firm during regular market hours.

Page 19: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Some important terms 3 Public orders with a price limit can also

become the market bid or offer if they are at a better price than those currently quoted by a registered market maker.

The market’s best bid and offer constitute the inside market, the best bid/ask, or the BBO. The best bid and offer across all markets trading an instrument is called the NBBO.

Page 20: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Some important terms 4 The difference between the best offer and

the best bid is the bid/ask spread, or the inside spread (touch).

Orders supply liquidity if they give other traders the opportunity to trade.

Orders demand liquidity (immediacy) if they take advantage of the liquidity supplied by other traders’ orders.

Page 21: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

What are agency/proprietary orders? Orders submitted by traders for their own

account are proprietary orders.• Broker-dealers and dealers.

Since most traders are unable to directly access the markets, most order are instead agency orders.• Presented by a broker to the market.

Page 22: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Market ordersInstruction to trade at the best price

currently available in the market.

• Immediacy• Buy at ask/sell at bid => pay the bid/ask

spread• Price uncertainty

Fills quickly but sometimes at inferior prices.

Page 23: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Used by impatient traders and traders who want to be sure that they will trade. It is usually thought that insiders use that type of order.

When submitting a market order execution is nearly certain but the execution price is uncertain.

Takes liquidity from the market in terms of immediacy. They then pay a price for immediacy, which is the bid-ask spread.

Page 24: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Market order: Example 1

Suppose that the quote is 20 bid, 24 offered. Suppose that the best estimate of the true value of the security is 22.

A market buy order would be executed at 24 for a security worth 22.

The price paid would be 24 and therefore the price of immediacy would then be 2.

Page 25: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Market order: Example 2

A market sell order would be executed at 20 for a security worth 22.

The price received would be 20 and therefore the price of immediacy would then be 2.

The price of immediacy is the bid-ask spread.

Page 26: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Price improvement

Price improvement is when a trader is willing to step up and offer a better price than that of the prevailing quotes (at order arrival).

Who benefits from price improvement? Who loses from price improvement?

Page 27: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Market impact Large market orders tend to move prices.

Liquidity might not be sufficient at the inside quotes for large orders to fill at the best price.

Prices might move further following the trade.• Information and liquidity reasons.

Page 28: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Market impact: Example For example, suppose that a 10K share

market buy order arrives in IBM and the best offer is $100 for 5K shares.

Half the order will fill at $100, but the next 5K will have to fill at the next price in the book, say at $100.02 (where we assume that there is also 5K offered).

The volume-weighted average price for the order will be $100.01, which is larger than $100.00.

Page 29: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Limit orders A limit order is an instruction to trade at

the best price available, but only if it is no worse than the limit price specified by the trader.

• For a limit buy order, the limit price specifies a maximum price.

• For a limit sell order, the limit price specifies a minimum price.

Page 30: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Limit orders: Examples If you submit a limit buy order for 100

shares (round lot) of Dell with limit price of $20. This means that you do not want to buy those 100 shares of Dell at a price above $20.

If you submit a limit sell order for 100 shares (round lot) of Dell with limit price of $24. This means that you do not want to sell those 100 shares of Dell at a price below $24.

Page 31: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

If the limit order is executable (marketable), than the broker (or an exchange) will fill the order right away.

If the order is not executable, the order will be a standing offer to trade.• Waiting for incoming order to obtain a fill.• Cancel the order.

Standing orders are placed in a file called a limit order book.

Page 32: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Limit price placement: (from very aggressive to least aggressive)

Marketable limit order: order that can immediately execute upon submission (limit price of a buy order is at or above the best offer),

At the market limit order: limit buy order with limit price equal to the best bid and limit sell order with limit price equal to the best offer,

Behind the market limit order: limit buy order with limit price below the best bid and limit sell order with limit price above the best offer.

Page 33: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Market Microstructure Seminar - T&E Chapter 4

Page 34: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Market Microstructure Seminar - T&E Chapter 4

Page 35: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

A standing limit order is a trading option that offers liquidity

A limit sell order is a call option and a limit buy order is a put option. Their strike prices are the limit prices.

A limit order is not an option contract (not sold).

The option is good until cancelled or until the order expires.

The value of the implicit limit order option increases with maturity.

Page 36: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Why would anyone use limit orders?

The compensation that limit order traders hope to receive for giving away free trading options is to trade at a better price.

However, options might not fill (execution uncertainty).• Chasing the price.

Page 37: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Limit order traders might also regret having had their order filled (adverse selection)…• What could cause a limit order to regret

obtaining a fill?• How would this fact affect strategies

involving limit orders?

Page 38: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Market Microstructure Seminar - T&E Chapter 4

Page 39: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Market Microstructure Seminar - T&E Chapter 4

Page 40: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Market Microstructure Seminar - T&E Chapter 4

Page 41: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Stop orders

Activates when the price of the stock reaches or passes through a predetermined limit (stop price). When the trade takes place the order becomes a market order (conditional market order).

Buy only after price rises to the stop price. Sell only after price falls to the stop price.

Page 42: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Stop orders are typically used to close down losing positions (stop loss orders).

Mainly used on market orders and few on limit orders.

Page 43: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Example: Suppose that the market for Dell is currently 20 bid, 24 offered.

Suppose that you place a stop loss order for 1,000 shares of Dell at a stop price of 15.

Suppose that after having placed that order, the market falls to: 13 bid, 15 offered. The bid price passed your stop price.

Your order is then executed at 13 provided there is enough quantity at that price.

The stop price may not be the price at which you are executed, as above.

Page 44: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Difference between stop orders and limit orders

The difference lies in their relation with respect to the order flow.

A stop loss order transacts when the market is falling and it is a sell order. Therefore such an order takes liquidity away from the market (it must be accommodated so it provides impetus to any downward movement).

Page 45: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

A limit order trades on the opposite side of the market movement. If the market is rising, the upward movement triggers limit sell orders.

Outstanding limit orders provide liquidity to the market.

Page 46: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Tick-sensitive orders Traders who want to condition their orders

on the last price change submit tick-sensitive orders.• Uptick = current price is above the last

price• Downtick = current price is below the last

price• Zero-tick = current price is the same as

last price

Page 47: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Tick-sensitive orders

Do tick-sensitive orders demand or supply liquidity?

How do tick-sensitive orders compare to limit orders?

How are tick-sensitive orders affected by the minimum price-increment?

Page 48: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Order validity and expiration instructions Day orders (DAY) Good-till-cancel (GTC)

orders Good until orders Good-this-week

(GTW) orders, good-this-month (GTM) orders

Immediate-or-cancel (IOC) orders

Fill-or-kill (FOK) orders, good-on-sight orders

Good-after-orders Market-on-open

(MOO) orders Market-on-close

(MOC) orders

Page 49: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Quantity instructions

All-or-none (AON) orders

Minimum-or-none (MON) orders

All-or-nothing, and minimum acceptable quantity instructions

Page 50: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Other order instructions Spread orders Display instructions

• Hidden/Ice-berg/reserve orders Substitution orders

Special settlement instructions• Regular-way settlement• Cash settlement• How do these affect the cost of trading?

Page 51: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Chapter 5

Market Structures

Page 52: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Trading sessions

Trades take place during trading sessions.

• Continuous market sessions • Call market sessions

Page 53: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Continuous markets

Traders may trade at anytime while the market is open.

Traders may continuously attempt to arranger their trades.

Dealer markets or quote driven markets are, by definition, continuous markets.

Page 54: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Pros and cons of continuous markets Pros for continuous markets

• Traders can arrange their trades whenever they want.

• Information may be incorporated very fast into prices.

Cons for continuous markets• more volatile

Page 55: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Call markets Traders may trade in call markets only

when the market is called.

You may have all securities called at the same time or only some. The market may be called several times per day.

Used to open sessions in continuous markets (Bourse de Paris, NYSE,…). Also used for less active securities, bonds,….

Page 56: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Pros and cons of call marketsPros for call markets

• Focus the attention of traders on the same security at the same time.• Less volatility

Cons for call markets

• Information may need a lot of time to be incorporated into prices.

Page 57: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Execution systems

The execution system matches the buyers with the sellers.

quote-driven markets

order-driven markets

brokered markets

hybrid markets

Page 58: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Quote-driven dealer markets

In pure quote-driven markets, dealers participate in every trade.

Dealers provide all the liquidity and quote bid and ask prices. Those quotes are firm for some specified size, i.e., the dealers must honor them.

If the investor wants to trade a different size, there will be negotiation between the investor and the dealer.

Page 59: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Buy orders decrease the dealer’s inventory position whereas sell orders increase the dealer’s inventory position.

The dealer can then attract or reject order flow given her inventory position. The bid-ask spread’s placement will then reflect her inventory position.

Page 60: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

When the dealer’s inventory position is low, she sets both a high bid price and a high ask price.

When the dealer’s inventory position is high, she sets both a low bid and a low ask.

Page 61: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Examples of Dealer Markets:

• NASDAQ• London International Stock Exchange

(SEAQ)• OTC Bond Markets• Foreign Exchange Markets

Page 62: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

General features of a dealer market Multiple dealers, geographically dispersed,

electronically linked. No consolidation of trading: No “floor”. Virtually all customer trades are with a dealer. The dealer is the intermediary. Customers rarely trade against other customers. Dealers trade among themselves. Regulation and transparency are poor relative to

floor markets. Dealers may compete among themselves, but have

a lot of information and market power relative to customers.

Page 63: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Dealer market: NASDAQ/SEAQ

Two or more market makers per stock Trades were mainly phone negotiated Roughly 95% of the volume went

through MM book No central limit order book. Small order execution automated, but

not larger orders. Complete decentralization

Page 64: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Dealer obligations

Provide quotes during trading hours Offer “best execution” Report trades in a timely manner Fair communication

Page 65: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

In an order-driven auction market, all traders issue orders to the exchange.

Buyers and sellers regularly trade with each other without the intermediation of dealers.

But dealers may choose to trade. Order driven markets may be organized as

continuous markets or as call markets.

Order-driven markets (Ch. 6)

Page 66: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Brokered markets

Brokers match up buyer and seller.• Search is often required to match buyer

and sellers for less liquid items, and for large blocks of securities

• Brokers specialize in locating counterparts to difficult orders

• Concealed traders• Latent traders

Page 67: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Examples of brokered markets include:• Block trading (stocks and bonds)• Real estate• Business concerns

Page 68: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Hybrid markets

Hybrid markets mix aspects of the various structures.

The most common hybrid markets are those with dealer-specialists.

These markets are order-driven auction markets in which the specialist must provide liquidity under some circumstances.

Most US stock exchanges and options exchanges have specialist systems.

Page 69: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Market information systems

It is of utmost important that orders are not lost and that order instructions are understood.• Ticker symbols• Order routing systems• Order presentation systems• Messaging systems

Page 70: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

The information created by trading is valuable.• Market data systems report trades to the

public• Broadcast services

Price and sale feeds Ticker tapes Quotation feeds

Transparency is a key feature of markets.• Ex ante vs. ex post transparency

Page 71: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Chapter 6Order-driven Markets

Page 72: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Order-driven markets

Most important exchanges are order-driven markets.

Most newly organized trading systems are electronic order-driven markets.

All order-driven markets use order precedence rule and trade pricing rule.

Page 73: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Examples of pure order-driven markets- Tokyo Stock Exchange,

- KSE, KOSDAQ

- Paris Bourse,

- Toronto Stock Exchange,

- Most Future Markets,

- Most European Exchanges for equities (Milan, Barcelona, Madrid, Bilbao, Zurich,….)

Page 74: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Types of order-driven markets

Oral auctions

Rule-based order matching systems• Single price auctions• Continuous order book auctions• Crossing networks

Page 75: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

In order-driven markets, trading rules specify how trades are arranged:

- order precedence rules: match buy orders with sell orders

1. Price priority2. Time precedence or time priority

- trade price rules: determine the trade price1. Uniform pricing rule (single price auction)2. Discriminatory pricing rule

Page 76: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Oral auctions Used by many futures, options, and stock

exchanges.• The largest example is the US government long

treasury bond futures market (CBOT, 500 floor traders).

Traders arrange their trades face-to-face on an exchange trading floor.• Cry out bids and offers (offer liquidity)• Listen for bids and offers (take liquidity)• “Take it” = accept offer• “Sold” = accept bid

Page 77: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Open outcry rule – the first rule of oral auctions

• Traders must publicly announce their bids and offers so that all other traders may react to them (no whispering…).

• Traders must also publicly announce that they accept bids/offers.

• Why is this necessary?

Page 78: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Order precedence rules• Price priority

Should a trader be allowed to bid below the best bid, above the best ask in an oral auction?

• Time precedence Is time precedence maintained for subsequent

orders at the best bid or offer? Why? Why not? How can a trader keep his bid or offer “live”? The minimum tick size is the price a trader has to

pay to acquire precedence.

• Public order precedence Why do you think this is necessary?

Page 79: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Trade pricing rule

• Trades take place at the price that is accepted, i.e., the bid or offer.

• Discriminatory pricing rule.Why do you think it is called

discriminatory? Who gets the surplus?

Page 80: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Trading floors

• Trading floors can be arranged in several rooms as on the NYSE, with each stock being traded at a specific “trading post.”

• Trading floors can also be arranged in “pits” as in the futures markets.

Page 81: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Rule-based order-matching systems

Used by most exchanges and almost all ECNs.

Trading rules arrange trades from the orders that traders submit to them.

No face-to-face negotiation. Most systems accept only limit orders.

• Why do you think most systems are reluctant to accept market orders?

Page 82: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Orders are for a specified size. Electronic trading systems process the

orders. Trades may take place in a call, or

continuously.• A new order arrival “activates” the trading

system. Systems match orders using order

precedence rules, determine which matches can trade, and price the resulting trades.

Page 83: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Order precedence rulesPrice priority

• Market orders always rank above limit orders.

• Limit buy orders with high prices have priority over limit buy orders with low prices

• Limit sell orders with low prices have priority over limit sell orders with high prices.

Page 84: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Time precedence• Under time precedence, the first order at

a given price has precedence over all other orders at that price. Gives orders precedence according to their time of submission.

• The pure price-time rule uses only price priority and time precedence.

• Floor time precedence to first order at price. All subsequent orders at that price have parity (Oral auction)

Page 85: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Display precedence• Why do markets use display

precedence?Size precedence

• Some markets give precedence to small orders, other markets favor large orders (NYSE).

Public order precedence • Public orders have precedence over

member orders at a given price.

Page 86: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Trades are arranged by matching the highest ranking buy orders with the highest ranking sell orders.

Order precedence rules are used to rank orders.

Order precedence rules vary across markets. However, the first rule is almost always price priority.

Page 87: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Trade pricing rules

Single price auctions use the uniform pricing rule. Most continuous order-driven markets use the discriminatory pricing rule.

Page 88: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

All matched orders are executed at the same price.

This rule is used for opening markets in many equities markets, following trading halts for many continuous markets, and in the AZX,….

Uniform pricing rule

Page 89: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

In a continuous market trade takes place when an incoming order is matched with a standing limit order.

Under the discriminatory pricing rule, the trade price is the limit price of the standing limit order.

Discriminatory pricing rule

Page 90: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Example – Pure price-time precedenceTime Trader Buy/Sell Size Price

12:02 Sammy Sell 100 $20.05

12:06 Steve Sell 200 $20.06

12:15 Bern Buy 500 $20.06

12:16 Susie Sell 300 $20.08

12:20 Ben Buy 200 Infinite

12:21 Bob Buy 100 $20.08

12:24 Sandy Sell 500 $20.12

12:25 Bev Buy 500 $20.08

12:27

12:27

Bill

Seth

Buy

Sell

200

200

$20.05

$20.10

Page 91: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Example – the order bookSellers Buyers

Trader Size Price Size Trader

Sammy 100 $20.05 200 Bill

Steve 200 $20.06 500 Bern

$20.08 100 Bob

Susie 300 $20.08 500 Bev

Seth 200 $20.10

Sandy 500 $20.12

Infinite 200 Ben

Page 92: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Clearing the order book with a call at 12:30

Sellers Buyers

Trader Size Price Size Trader

Sammy 100 0 $20.05 200 Bill

Steve 200 100 0 $20.06 500 Bern

$20.08 100 Bob

Susie 300 0 $20.08 500 200 Bev

Seth 200 $20.10

Sandy 500 $20.12

Infinite 200 0 Ben

Page 93: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Trades in the example - call

Buyer Seller Quantity Price?

Ben Sammy 100 Infinity, $20.05

Ben Steve 100 Infinity, $20.06

Bob Steve 100 $20.08, $20.06

Bev Susie 300 $20.08

Page 94: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Example–the order book after the call

Sellers Buyers

Trader Size Price Size Trader

$20.05 200 Bill

$20.06 500 Bern

$20.08 200 Bev

Seth 200 $20.10

Sandy 500 $20.12

Page 95: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Example - What should be the price/prices?

Possibilities include:• Infinite• $20.05• $20.06• $20.08

The price/prices depends on the trade pricing rules.

Page 96: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

What should be the price/prices?

Single price auctions use the uniform pricing rule: • Everyone gets the same price.

Continuous two-sided auctions and a few call markets use the discriminatory pricing rule.• Trades occur at different prices.

Crossing networks use the derivative pricing rule.• The price is determined by another market.

Page 97: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Uniform pricing rule

All trades take place at the same “market clearing price.”• The market clearing price is determined

by the last feasible trade.Matching by price priority implies that

this market clearing price is also feasible for all previously matched orders.

Page 98: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

In Example 1, the last feasible trade is between Bev and Susie, so the market clearing price is $20.08.• Sam, Steve and Susie are happy with a

market clearing price of $20.08 since they were willing to sell at $20.08 or lower.

• Ben, Bob, and Bev are happy to with a market clearing price of $20.08 since they were willing to buy at $20.08 or higher.

Page 99: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

If the buy and sell orders in the last feasible trade specify different prices, the market clearing price can be at either the price of the buy or the price of the sell order.

The trade pricing rules will dictate which one to use.

Page 100: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Supply and Demand

The single-price auction clears at the price where supply equals demand.

• At prices below the market clearing price, there is excess demand.

• At prices above the market clearing price, there is excess supply.

Page 101: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Single price auctions maximize the volume of trading by setting the price where supply equals demand.

• Because prices in most securities markets are discrete, there is typically excess demand or excess supply at the market clearing price.

• In the Example, what is the excess demand or supply?

Page 102: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

The single price auction also maximizes the benefits that traders derive from participating in the auction.

• Trader surplus for a seller = the difference between the trade price and the seller’s valuation

• Trader surplus for a buyer = the difference between the buyer’s valuation and the trade price.

• Valuations are unobservable, but we may assume that they at least are linked to limit prices.

Page 103: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Example: Demand and Supply

$20.04

$20.05

$20.06

$20.07

$20.08

$20.09

$20.10

$20.11

$20.12

$20.13

0 300 600 900 1200 1500

SupplyDemand

Page 104: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Discriminatory Pricing Rule

Continuous two-sided auction markets maintain an order book.

• The buy and sell orders are separately sorted by their precedence.The highest bid and the lowest offer are

the best bid and offer respectively.

Page 105: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

• When a new order arrives, the system tries to match this order with orders on the other side. If a trade is possible, e.g., the limit buy

order is for a price at or above the best offer, the order is called a marketable order.

If a trade is not possible, the order will be sorted into the book according to its precedence.

Page 106: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Discriminatory Pricing Rule

Under the discriminatory pricing rule, the limit price of the standing order dictates the price for the trade.

If the incoming order fills against multiple standing orders with different prices, trades will take place at multiple prices.

Page 107: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Continuous trading @12:02Sellers Buyers

Trader Size Price Size Trader

Sammy 100 $20.05

$20.06

$20.08

$20.08

$20.10

$20.12

Infinite

Page 108: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Continuous trading @12:06

Sellers Buyers

Trader Size Price Size Trader

Sammy 100 $20.05

Steve 200 $20.06

$20.08

$20.08

$20.10

$20.12

Infinite

Page 109: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Continuous trading @12:15

Sellers Buyers

Trader Size Price Size Trader

Sammy 100 0 $20.05

Steve 200 0 $20.06 500 200 Bern

$20.08

$20.08

$20.10

$20.12

Infinite

Page 110: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Continuous trading @12:16

Sellers Buyers

Trader Size Price Size Trader

Sammy 100 0 $20.05

Steve 200 0 $20.06 500 200 Bern

Susie 300 $20.08

$20.08

$20.10

$20.12

Infinite

Page 111: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Continuous trading @12:20

Sellers Buyers

Trader Size Price Size Trader

Sammy 100 0 $20.05

Steve 200 0 $20.06 500 200 Bern

Susie 300 100 $20.08

$20.08

$20.10

$20.12

Infinite 200 0 Ben

Page 112: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Continuous trading @12:21

Sellers Buyers

Trader Size Price Size Trader

Sammy 100 0 $20.05

Steve 200 0 $20.06 500 200 Bern

Susie 300 100 0 $20.08 100 0 Bob

$20.08

$20.10

$20.12

Infinite 200 0 Ben

Page 113: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Continuous trading @12:24

Sellers Buyers

Trader Size Price Size Trader

Sammy 100 0 $20.05

Steve 200 0 $20.06 500 200 Bern

Susie 300 100 0 $20.08 100 0 Bob

$20.08

$20.10

Sandy 500 $20.12

Infinite 200 0 Ben

Page 114: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Continuous trading @12:25

Sellers Buyers

Trader Size Price Size Trader

Sammy 100 0 $20.05

Steve 200 0 $20.06 500 200 Bern

Susie 300 100 0 $20.08 100 0 Bob

$20.08 500 Bev

$20.10

Sandy 500 $20.12

Infinite 200 0 Ben

Page 115: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Continuous trading @12:27

Sellers Buyers

Trader Size Price Size Trader

Sammy 100 0 $20.05 200 Bill

Steve 200 0 $20.06 500 200 Bern

Susie 300 100 0 $20.08 100 0 Bob

$20.08 500 Bev

Seth 200 $20.10

Sandy 500 $20.12

Infinite 200 0 Ben

Page 116: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Summary continuous tradingBuyer Seller Size Price Bid Offer

$20.05x100

$20.06x100

Bern Sammy 100 $20.05

Bern Steve 200 $20.06

$20.06x200

$20.06x200 $20.08x300

Ben Susie 200 $20.08

$20.06x200 $20.08x100

Bob Susie 100 $20.08

$20.06x200

$20.06x200 $20.12x500

$20.08x500 $20.12x500

$20.08x500 $20.10x200

Page 117: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Discriminatory vs. uniform pricing rules

Taking the orders as given, large impatient traders (e.g., liquidity demanders: marketable limit orders) prefer the discriminatory pricing rule (to exploit better price).

Taking the orders as given, standing limit order traders (liquidity suppliers) prefer the uniform pricing rule (to maximize surplus).

Page 118: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

However, orders are not given.• Limit order traders tend to price their orders

more aggressively under the uniform pricing rule.

• Can you explain this prediction?• Why would large traders want to split their

orders when trading under the uniform pricing rule?

• What role can trading halts have in affecting the pricing rules?

Page 119: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Continuous versus call markets The single price auction produces a larger

trader surplus than the continuous auction when processing the same order flow (example).• Concentration of order flow increases

total trader surplus.• In practice, traders will not send the

same order flow to call and continuous markets.

Page 120: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

The single price auction will typically trade a lower volume than the continuous auction.

• In our example, both trade 600 shares…• See textbook example (Table 6-7 & 6-8)

However, there is another benefit of the continuous market – it allows traders to trade when they state their demands.

Page 121: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Additional examples

Page 122: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Example 2: Batch market and surplus

Page 123: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo
Page 124: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo
Page 125: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo
Page 126: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo
Page 127: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo
Page 128: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Example 3: Batch and continuous: Trading volume

Page 129: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo
Page 130: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo
Page 131: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Continuous systemIn that case orders are arranged as soon as they arrive if

they can be matched with outstanding orders.

At 10:00, Sean submits the first order (a limit buy order with price 200 for 300 shares). As the book is empty, his order will have to wait in the order book.

At 10:02, Siobhan submits the second order (a limit sell order with price 201 for 200 shares). As the maximum price for the limit buy order is lower than the minimum price for the limit sell order, those two orders cannot be matched. As a result, the market is 200 bid for 300, 200 offered at 201. The bid-ask spread is 1.

Page 132: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo
Page 133: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo
Page 134: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo
Page 135: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo
Page 136: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo
Page 137: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo
Page 138: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo
Page 139: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Electronic trading platforms Centralized order-driven market with

automated order routing. Decentralized computer network for

access. Member firms act as brokers or principals. No designated market makers Central limit order book/information

system/clearing and settlement Off-book trading is sometimes significant

Page 140: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

The (limit order) book

The broker might have other limit orders besides ours. A collection of unexecuted limit orders is a “book”.

The book may have buy and sell orders. In US futures pits, each broker may have

his/her own book. In many other markets, the book is

consolidated: all unexecuted limit orders are recorded in one book.

Page 141: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

The electronic limit order book All orders are limit orders. The book is electronically visible. “Anyone” may enter an order. There has to be some established

relationship for clearing and credit purposes. The electronic limit order book is probably

the most common form of new market organization today, but it is far from universal.

Page 142: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

The Island ECN (now INET)

Island is a limit order market Island is an Electronic Communications

Network (ECN) It has no trading floor. All orders are sent

electronically.

Page 143: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

A survey of usage Some markets have a single consolidated

limit order book, where everything happens.

This is mostly true of the Tokyo Stock Exchange, Euronext, the Singapore Stock Exchange, the Taiwan Stock Exchange, etc., etc.

Other markets are fragmented.

There are multiple limit order books in different physical venues (or computers).

Page 144: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

In addition to the Island ECN, there is a limit order book for IBM at the New York Stock Exchange, the Boston Stock Exchange, the Pacific Stock Exchange, etc., etc.

The largest (deepest) limit order book for IBM is at the NYSE.

Page 145: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Different markets/different solutions

The pit markets in US futures exchanges do not have a centralized limit order book.

The Chicago Board Options Exchange does have a centralized book (run by a clerk).

The NYSE has a limit order book, run by the specialist. (But there are other books in NYSE-listed stocks on regional exchanges and other dealers.)

NASDAQ has multiple books.

Page 146: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Terminology

A centralized limit order book is often referred to as a “CLOB” (pron. kl.b)

Hard CLOB: All activity is forced (by law) through the book.

Soft CLOB: A CLOB exists, but trades can take place outside of it.

Page 147: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Limit order books: The problem areas Electronic limit order books are the

predominant continuous trading mechanism.

They do not seem to work well, however, in all circumstances. These include large trades, low activity securities and market breaks (“crashes”)

In these circumstances, some sort of active marketmaking presence (a dealer) seems to be necessary.

Page 148: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo
Page 149: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo
Page 150: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo
Page 151: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo
Page 152: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Chapter 10

Informed Traders and Market Efficiency

Page 153: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Informed traders

Acquire and act on information about fundamental values.

Buy (sell) when prices are below their estimates of fundamental value.

Include value traders, news traders, information-oriented technical traders, and arbitragers.

Page 154: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Fundamental values

The true values Not perfect foresight values Prices are said to informative when they

are equal to fundamental values Fundamental values are not predictable

(why?) Price changes in efficient markets are not

predictable (why?)

Page 155: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Informed traders make prices informative Because they buy (sell) when price is below

(above) their estimates of fundamental value, their trading move prices toward their estimates of fundamental value.

When informed traders accurately estimate values, their trading makes prices more informative.

Page 156: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

The market price is more informative (accurate) than individual value estimatesV = the true fundamental value,

P = the market price,

vi = value estimate of trader i; vi = V + ei, where E(ei) = 0,

Di = trader i’s desired position in the security;

Di = a(vi – P), where a is a constant.

From ∑ Di = ∑ a(vi – P) = 0 (i.e., zero net supply), we have

∑ a(vi – P) = 0 → a∑(vi – P) = 0 → ∑(vi – P) = 0 → ∑vi – ∑P = 0

→ ∑vi = ∑P = N * P → P = (1/N) ∑vi

P = (1/N) ∑vi = (1/N) ∑(V + ei) = V + eM, where eM = (1/N) ∑ei ≈ 0.

Page 157: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Informed trading strategies Must minimize price impact to maximize

profits. Trade aggressively when their private

information will soon become common knowledge.

Trade slowly when their private information will not soon become common knowledge.

Trade aggressively when other traders will act on the same information.

Page 158: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Liquidity and Predictability-Strategic Trading with Private Information and Price Impact

If you buy a contract, you receive $1 with a probability of π and zero with 1- π.

The market price of the contract is

P = 0.3 + ¼(Q/L), where Q is your trade size and L denotes liquidity.

Your profit = πQ – PQ = πQ – [0.3 + ¼(Q/L)]Q

Your profit is maximized when Q = 2L(π – 0.3)

Your maximum profit = L(π – 0.3)2

Page 159: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Styles of informed trading

Value traders – all information News traders – new information Information-oriented technical traders –

predictable price patterns Arbitragers – relative instrument values

rather than absolute instrument values

Page 160: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Informed trading profits

Precise and orthogonal estimates Impossibility of informationally efficient

markets (Grossman and Stiglitz) Three forms of efficient markets

hypothesis

Page 161: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Chapter 11

Order Anticipators

Page 162: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Order Anticipators

Front runners, Sentiment-oriented technical traders, Squeezers, Manipulation of stop orders

They do not make prices more informative or markets more liquid.

Tick size is important. They are all parasitic traders.

Page 163: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Front Runners Front running aggressive traders

• Profit from the price impact of aggressive traders. Discuss example.

• Illegal when they violate a confidential brokerage relationship.

Front running passive traders• Quote matching or penny jumping. Discuss

example.• Extract option values of the standing orders.

Page 164: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Front Running and Market Efficiency Make prices less informative when they

front run uninformed traders. Make prices more informative when they

front run informed traders. Long-run effect of informed traders may be

to make market prices less informative!• Why? Because traders invest less in

information due to smaller profits.

Page 165: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Front Running and Liquidity

Front runners make markets less liquid. They benefit the traders with whom they

trade when they improve prices to step in front of other traders.

They do so at the expense of the traders they front run. (Extracting option values)

Some traders become less aggressive when confronted with front runners.

Page 166: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Sentiment-Oriented Technical Traders They try to predict the trades that

uninformed traders will decide to make. They profit from the price impact of

uninformed trades. Their trading make market prices less

informative because they try to trade before uninformed traders.

They make markets less liquid for the traders they front-run.

Page 167: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Squeezers

They try to monopolize one side of a market so that anyone who must liquidate a position on the other side must trade with them.

Make prices less informative due to price manipulation.

Illegal in the US.

Page 168: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Manipulation of Stop Orders

“Gunning the market” Push prices up or down to activate stop

orders. Stop orders then accelerate those price

changes. They close their positions at a profit by

trading with the stop orders! Use example. Illegal in the US. But almost impossible to

enforce.

Page 169: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Chapter 13 &14

Dealers and Bid-Ask Spreads

Page 170: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

A broker acts as an agent for a customer,representing customer orders in the market (e.g., a real estate broker).A dealer takes the other side of customer trades (e.g., a used-car dealer).Much of US securities regulation applies to both brokers and dealers. The US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) refers to such people as “broker-dealers”. In fact, broker and dealer functions are quite distinct.

What defines a dealer?

Page 171: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Dealer quotes

Dealer spread vs. inside spread One-sided vs. two-sided market Firm vs. soft quotes Quoted vs. realized spread Best execution rule Order preferencing

Page 172: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

The bid-ask spread The bid-ask spread is the difference

between the ask price and the bid price (quoted spread).

The quoted spread gives an estimation of the remuneration of the service provided by dealers to traders. The remuneration increases with the spread.

Dealers make money by buying low and selling high. They lose money when market conditions lead them to buy at high prices and sell at low prices.

Page 173: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

The realized spread (difference between the price at which dealers effectively buy and sell their securities) is the true remuneration of providing liquidity.

The realized spread

Page 174: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Dealer inventories Inventories are positions that dealers have

on the security they trade. They may hold a long position or a short position.

Target Inventories are positions that dealers want to hold.

Dealers’ inventories are in balance when they are near the dealers’ target levels and out of balance otherwise.

Page 175: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Inventory risk

For risk averse dealers any difference between inventories is costly.

They then require compensation for absorbing transitory mismatches in supply and demand over time (transitory risk premium).

The larger the mismatch, the greater the risk the dealer must assume and the greater the compensation required by dealers.

Page 176: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Dealer inventory control Dealers may act to control their inventories. As dealers’ prices affect other traders’

trading decisions, the placement of the dealers’ bid-ask spread may be used to control their inventories.

When dealers’ inventories are below (above) their target inventories, they must buy (sell) the security.

Page 177: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Dealers increase their prices (bid and ask) when they want to increase their inventory.• Higher bid prices encourage traders from selling

to them and higher ask prices discourage traders from buying from them.

Dealers decrease their prices when they want to decrease their inventory.• Lower bid prices discourage traders from selling

to dealers and lower ask prices encourage traders from buying from the dealers.

Page 178: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Depth (size) control

Page 179: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Inventory risk Diversifiable inventory risk

• When future price changes are independent of inventory imbalances

• Can be minimized by dealing in many instruments

Adverse selection risk• When future price changes are inversely related

to inventory imbalances• Arises when dealers trade with informed traders

Page 180: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Adverse selection losses Informed traders buy when they think that

prices will rise and sell otherwise. When dealers trade with informed traders,

• prices tend to fall after the dealers buy and rise after the dealers sell (i.e., future price changes are inversely related to inventory imbalances)

• their realized spreads are often negative.

Page 181: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Dealer optimization problem Dealers always gain to liquidity-motivated

transactors.

Dealers can balance the losses made on informed trading with the profits made on uninformed trading.

Page 182: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Dealer optimal responses when sold to an informed trader

Raise ask price and lower ask size Raise bid price and increase bid size Buy from another trader at his ask price Buy a correlated instrument

Page 183: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Dealer optimal responses when bought from an informed trader

Lower ask price and raise ask size Lower bid price and reduce bid size Sell to another trader at his bid price Sell a correlated instrument

Page 184: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Dealer optimal responses when the next trader is an informed traders Ask price = the best estimate of

fundamental value, conditional on the next trader being a buyer. (regret-free price)

Bid price = the best estimate of fundamental value, conditional on the next trader being a seller.

Because dealers generally do not know whether the next trader is well informed, they use the probability that the next trader is well informed.

Page 185: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Bid/ask spreads – Chapter 14

The spread is the compensation dealers and limit order traders receive for offering immediacy.

The most important factor in order placement decision (market vs. limit orders)

The most important factor in dealer’s liquidity provision decision

The most important chapter of the book.

Page 186: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Dealer spreads

Monopoly dealers Low barriers to entry in most markets In many markets, dealers face competition

from public limit order traders Normal vs. economic profits – Dealers

earn only normal profits in competitive dealer markets

Page 187: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Components of the spread Transaction cost component

• Transitory spread component• Covers the normal costs of doing business,

monopoly profits, risk premium• Responsible for bid-ask bounce

Adverse selection component• Compensate dealers for losses to informed

traders• Permanent spread component

Page 188: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Two explanations for adverse selection component Information perspective

• The difference in the value estimates that dealers make conditional on the next trader being a buyer or a seller

Accounting perspective• The portion of the spread that dealers must

quote to recover from uninformed traders what they lose to informed traders

Page 189: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

V = the unconditional value of a securityP = the probability that the next trader is an

informed traderV+E = the value of the security when an

informed trader wants to buyV-E = the value of the security when an

informed trader wants to sellThe next trader is equally likely to be a buyer

or a seller.

Definition and assumption

Page 190: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Conditional expectation of the security value given that the next trader is a buyer

= (1-P)V + P(V+E) = V + PE

Conditional expectation of the security value given that the next trader is a seller

= (1-P)V + P(V-E) = V - PE

Adverse selection component of the spread = (V + PE) – (V - PE) = 2PE

Information model

Page 191: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Accounting modelLet B is the dealer’s bid price and A is the dealer’s ask price.

Conditional expectation of dealer profit given that the next trader is a seller

= (1-P)(V-B) + P[(V-E) - B] = V - B – PE.Conditional expectation of dealer profit given that the next

trader is a buyer = (1-P)(A-V) + P[A - (V+E)] = A - V – PE.Since the next trader is equally likely to be a buyer or a

seller, the expected dealer profit is = ½(V – B – PE) + ½(A – V – PE) = ½(A – B) – PE.

Finally, setting ½(A – B) – PE = 0, we obtain A – B = 2PE.

Page 192: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Uninformed traders lose to informed traders When uninformed traders use limit orders

• Informed traders trade on either the other side or the same side, depending on their private information.

• Uninformed traders either regret trading or regret not trading.

When uninformed traders use market orders• Pay large spreads (due to informed trading)

Page 193: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Determinants of equilibrium spreads in continuous order-driven markets

Information asymmetry among traders (+++) Time to cancel limit orders (++) Volatility (++) Limit order management costs (+) Value of trader time (+) Differential commission between limit and

market orders Trader risk aversion (+)

Page 194: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Cross-sectional determinants of equilibrium spreads – Primary

Information asymmetry Volatility

• Limit order option values increase with volatility• Inventory risks increase with volatility• Asymmetry problem increases with volatility

Utilitarian trading interest• Utilitarian traders are uninformed - lower adverse selection• High volume stocks have lower order processing costs, smaller

inventory risks, more limit order trading, smaller timing option value, and more dealer competition

Page 195: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

An example: I buy 100 shares of ABC. When I decide to buy the shares, the market is

50 bid, 51 offered. I actually buy at 51.20, paying a $29 commission.

Cash outflow = 5,120 + 29 = 5,149 When I make the decision to sell, the market is 54 bid, 54.50 offered. I

actually sell at 54, paying a $29 commission.

Cash inflow = 5,400 – 29 = 5,371

My net cash flow is 5,371 – 5,149 = 222. [A return of 4.31%(= 222/5,149)]

In my paper portfolio, I buy and sell at the midpoint of the bid and ask quotes at the time I decide to trade.

I buy 100 shares at 50.50 and sell at 54.25 = 375 (a 7.43% return)

The implementation shortfall is 375 – 222 = 153 (ignoring interest)

Alternatively, the implementation shortfall is 7.43% – 4.31% = 3.12%

Page 196: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Further analysis The cost of a trade is explicit cost + implicit cost

Explicit cost: commission (net of any rebates of goods or services, “soft dollars”)

Implicit cost: the cost of interacting with the market.

The initial purchase was made $0.70/sh above the BAM, so the implicit cost = $70

The final sale was made $0.25/sh below the BAM, so the implicit cost = $25

The implicit cost computed with respect to the BAM is the effective cost. The effective cost is a useful measure for market orders.

Page 197: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Effective cost

Page 198: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

The effective spread

Effective spread = 2 x effective cost

For the initial purchase, the effective spread

= 2 x $0.70 = $1.40 / share.

Intuition

The quoted (posted) spread is 51 – 50 = 1. If a buyer pays $0.70 above the BAM and sells $0.70 below the BAM, they are effectively facing a bid-ask spread of $1.40.

Page 199: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Realized cost and realized spread

For executed trades, the realized cost is the transaction price relative to the BAM at some time subsequent to the trade.

This impounds price movements after the trade (including the price impact due to the information in the trade).

Page 200: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Realized cost and realized spread

Page 201: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

An interpretation of the realized cost This cost can be interpreted as the profit realized

by the other (contra) side (e.g., dealer) of the trade, assuming the contra side could lay off the position at the new BAM.

Example• The dealer sells to the customer at 100.09.• Five minutes later, the market is bid 100.02, 100.12

offered (BAM = (100.02+100.12)/2 = 100.07.)• The realized cost is 0.02.• This would be the dealer’s profit if he could reverse

the trade (purchase the stock) at the subsequent BAM.

Page 202: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

SummaryQuoted Spread = (Ask – Bid)

= [(Ask – M) + (M – Bid)],

where M = (1/2)(Ask + Bid) = the midpoint of the bid and ask.

Effective Spread = 2Abs(T – M) = 2D(T – M)

= 2 x Effective Cost,

where T = the transaction price,D = +1 for customer buy order and

-1 for customer sell order.

Page 203: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Price Impact = D(M+ – M).Price Impact measures decreases in M following

customer sells and increases in asset value following customer buys, which reflect the market’s assessment of the private information the trades convey. Such price moves constitutes a cost to market makers, who buy prior to price decreases and sell prior to price increases.

Realized Spread = Effective Spread - Price Impact= 2D(T – M) - 2D(M+ – M) = 2D(T - M+) = 2 x Realized Cost= Market making revenue, net of losses to better-informed traders

Page 204: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

The effective cost of a sequence of market orders Oftentimes traders break up large orders into smaller

ones, and feed them to the market over time. In a sequence of orders, the cumulative price impact

means that later orders will trade at worse prices than early ones.

For a buy sequence, the effective cost is:(volume weighted average purchase price) –(BAM prevailing at time of trading decision)

Suppose the BAM is 10.00. We buy 100 shares at 10.10, 500 shares at 10.25 and 400 shares at 10.50.

• The vol wtd average purchase price is 10.335/share.• The effective cost is $0.335 per share.

Page 205: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Inferring impact costs from effective and realized spreads

Suppose the BAM = $10.00. We want to buy 1,000 shares.

The effective cost of one 1,000 share order is $0.30/sh. If we split the order into two 500 share trades, we pay

500 x ($10.00 + $0.20) + 500 x ($10.00 + $0.35)

= $10,275 Relative to the initial midpoint, the trading cost is 275

($0.275/sh)

Page 206: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Measuring market impact

Statistical tools from time series analysis attempt to correlate orders with subsequent price movements. See Chung et al. (2004)

General considerations.• Market impact is not the same for all orders in all

markets.• Large orders have higher impact than smaller orders.• Orders perceived as originating from “smart” traders

will have high impact.• Orders that execute in markets that cater to retail

investors will have low impact.

Page 207: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Measuring the cost of limit orders For a single limit order there are no summary

measures comparable to effective and realized spreads.

Market orders always execute. The only issue is price.

Limit orders often don’t execute.• How should we account for an order that wasn’t filled?• What is the cost of a delayed execution?

It is possible to measure the effective cost of strategies that use limit orders if the strategy ensures an (eventual) execution.

Page 208: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

The cost of a first-limit-then-market strategy Situation: the trader must fill an order by some pre-set time (like the

close of trading). Strategy

• First use limit orders at (or away from) the market.• If a limit order doesn’t execute within some pre-set time, replace it with a

more aggressively priced order.• Repeat.• If no limit orders have been filled by the end of the day, switch to a market

order.

Example: It’s 10am. I have to buy 100 shares by today’s close. The market is 20.50 bid 20.60 offered.

• I put in a buy limit order at 20.50.• If the order hasn’t executed in 30 minutes, I’ll cancel and replace with a

buy limit order priced at 20.51, etc.• If no fill by the close, I’ll cancel the limit order and submit a market order.

Page 209: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Adverse selection model &

Components of bid-ask spreads

(see lecture notes)

Page 210: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Chapter 20Volatility

Page 211: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Volatility Fundamental volatility is due to

unanticipated changes in instrument values • Price changes due to adverse selection

spread component contribute to fundamental volatility

Transitory volatility is due to trading activity by uninformed traders

Page 212: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Fundamental volatility factors

Unexpected changes in Interest rates and credit rating (bonds) Factors that affect firm value (stocks) National inflation rates, macroeconomic

policies, and trade and capital flows (currencies)

Cash market supply and demand (commodities)

Page 213: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Other factors that affect fundamental volatility Storage costs

High storage costs → small inventories

→ demand shocks → high price volatility Perishable goods Fundamental uncertainties

• High PE ratios, high political risks, highly leveraged firms

Page 214: Research Methodology in Market Microstructure Kee H. Chung State University of New York at Buffalo

Transitory volatility Arises when the demands of impatient

uninformed traders cause prices to diverge from fundamental values.

These price changes are transitory because prices eventually revert to fundamental values.

The transaction cost component of the bid-ask spread contributes to transitory volatility (i.e., bid-ask bounce).

Bid-ask bounce causes negative serial correlation in transaction price changes. See Roll’s model.