resettlement planning document › ... › 76636 › 27245-phi-larp.pdf · resettlement planning...

Resettlement Planning Document

The resettlement plan is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB’s Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature.

Resettlement Plan for the Can-Asujan Small Reservoir Irrigation Project Final Project Number: 27245 May 2003

PHI: Southern Philippines Irrigation Sector Project

Prepared by: National Irrigation Administration; PRIMEX

Republic of the Philippines

National Irrigation Administration

Asian Development Bank

Southern Philippines Irrigation Sector ProjectSouthern Philippines Irrigation Sector Project (SPISP)

(ADB Loan No. 1668-PHI)

LAND ACQUISITION AND RESETTLEMENT PLAN LAND ACQUISITION AND RESETTLEMENT PLAN FOR THE CANFOR THE CAN--ASUJAN ASUJAN

SMALL RESERVOIR SMALL RESERVOIR IRRIGATION PROJECTIRRIGATION PROJECT

MAY 2003 MAY 2003

MIGUEL D. LOPEZMIGUEL D. LOPEZ Rural SociologistRural Sociologist

Pacific Rim Innovation Pacific Rim Innovation Management and Exponents Inc.Management and Exponents Inc.

ã LARP for the Can-asujan SRIP

i May 2003

SOUTHERN PHILIPPINES IRRIGATION SECTOR PROJECT

LAND ACQUISITION AND RESETTLEMENT PLAN

FOR THE CAN-ASUJAN SMALL RESERVOIR IRRIGATION PROJECT

TABLE OF CONTENTS Page List of Figures iii List of Tables iv List of Annexes v List of Acronyms vi Executive Summary vii 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1

1.1 Description of the Project 1 1.2 Financial Aspects of the LAR Compensation Process 4 1.3 Types of Impact/ Steps for Mitigation of Impacts 4 1.4 Rehabilitation and Impact Mitigation Measures 7 1.5 Objectives of the LARP 7

2.0 LAND ACQUISITION AND RESETTLEMENT PLAN (LARP)

REQUIREMENT 9 2.1 NIA-SPSISP/PGAN Resettlement Policy and Program

Framework 9 2.2 Pre-condition to Civil Works Implementation 9 2.3 Rationale for the full LARP for the Can-asujan SRIP 9

3.0 LEGAL BACKGROUND 10 3.1 NIA-SPISP RPPF and ADB Resettlement Guidelines 10 3.2 Eligibility 13 3.3 Cut-off Date 13

4.0 BASELINE INFORMATION AND SOCIO-ECONOMIC

CHARACTERISTICS OF PROJECT AFFECTED PERSONS/ FAMILIES 15

4.1 PAPs/PAFs, their Location and Scope of Impacts 15 4.2 Socio-economic Status of the Affected Persons 17 4.3 Compensation, Relocation and Rehabilitation Requirements 18


ii May 2003

5.0 RELOCATION AND COMPENSATION ENTITLEMENTS 21

5.1 Resettlement and Compensation Entitlements 21

6.0 REHABILITATION 29 6.1 Livelihood Development and Income Restoration 29

7.0 ORGANIZATIONAL FRAMEWORK 31

7.1 Institutional Arrangement 31 7.2 Role of NGO in LARP Implementation 34

8.0 COMPLAINTS AND GRIEVANCE REDRESS MECHANISM 36

8.1 Complaints and Grievance Procedures 36 8.2 Redress Procedures 36

9.0 PUBLIC PARTICIPATION - DISCLOSURE, CONSULTATION

AND PARTICIPATION 38 9.1 Disclosure 38 9.2 Consultation and Participation 38 9.3 Gender Equity and Women Participation 39

10.0 LARP COST AND BUDGET 41

10.1 Budget Requirement 41 10.2 Flow of Funds 42

11.0 SUPERVISION AND MONITORING 44

11.1 Internal and External Monitoring 44 11.2 Schedules 45 11.3 Indicators for Monitoring and Evaluation 51

REFERENCES 53


iii May 2003

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure 1 - SPISP Subproject Areas including the Can-asujan SRIP 2 Figure 2 - Location Map of the Can-asujan SRIP 3 Figure 3 - Location Map of the Proposed Submerged Area 5 Figure 4 - Organizational Framework for the Can-asujan LARP Implementation 35 Figure 5 - Implementation Schedule 46


iv May 2003

LIST OF TABLES

Table 1 - Summary of Affected Households and Assets, Submerged and Dam Construction Areas 15 Table 2 - Summary of ROW Acquisition in the Irrigation Service Areas 17 Table 3 - Agreements on Resettlement and Compensation, Submerged and Dam Construction Areas 19 Table 4 - Summary of ROW Acquisition in the Service Area 20 Table 5 - Number of Affected Families/Persons and Resettlement Options Provided 20 Table 6 - SPISP Resettlement Policy Entitlement Matrix 22 Table 7 - Entitlement Matrix of the Can-asujan SRIP LARP 27 Table 8 - Proposed Budget for the LARP 41 Table 9 - Indicators for Internal Monitoring 51 Table 10 - Indicators for External Monitoring 52


v May 2003

LIST OF ANNEXES

Annex A - Complete List of PAPs in the Submerged and Dam Areas

Annex B - Complete List of PAPs in the Rice and Vegetable Areas Annex C - List of PAF/Ps for Full Resettlement and their Compensation

Package

Annex D - Relocation Site Development Plan Annex E - Draft MOA between the NIA and PAF/Ps Annex F - List of PAF/Ps for transfer Assistance and/or Compensation

Only Annex G - List of APs for Compensation Only

G1 - Main Cultivators/ Resident Only G2 - “Absentee” Land Claimants

Annex H - MOA Between the “Absentee” Land Claimants and Resident

Only Annex I - List of Claimants/Resident Cultivators Who Did Not Reach

Agreement or Sharing Annex J - List of APs in the Service Area Whose Land is Subject of

Expropriation Annex K - Information Booklet Prototype on the Can-asujan LARP Annex L - List of Meetings and Consultations with PAF/Ps Annex M - TOR for the Engagement of the External Evaluation Agency Annex N - Samples Signed Agreements for Different Areas


vi May 2003

LIST OF ACRONYMS ADB - Asian Development Bank AP - Affected People CENRO - Community Environment and Natural Resources Officer CIP/S - Communal Irrigation Project/ System CPMO - Central Project Management Office DA - Department of Agriculture DAR - Department of Agrarian Reform DECS - Department of Education, Culture and Sports DENR - Department of Environment and Natural Resources DOH - Department of Health EA - Executing Agency EO - Executive Order IA - Irrigation Association IDO - Irrigation Development Officer EIA - Environment Impact Assessment LARP - Land Acquisition and Resettlement Plan LGU - Local Government Unit MARO - Municipal Agrarian Reform Officer MCM - Million Cubic Meters MOA - Memorandum of Agreement MOU - Memorandum of Understanding MSWDO - Municipal Social Welfare and Development Office NIA - National Irrigation Administration NIP/S - National Irrigation Project/ System NPC - National Power Corporation NGO - Non-governmental Organizations NSO - National Statistics Office PAP - Project Affected Person PAF - Project Affected Families PAC - Provincial Appraisal Committee PDD - Project Development Department PIMT - Participatory Irrigation Management and Transfer PIO - Provincial Irrigation Office PMES - Participatory Monitoring and Evaluation System PNP - Philippine National Police PRA - Participatory Rural Appraisal PO - People’s Organization PSC - Project Steering Committee RA - Republic Act RPPF - Resettlement Policy and Program Framework ROW - Right-of-Way RSS - Rural Sociology Specialist SPISP - Southern Philippines Irrigation Sector Project SPMO - Sub-Project Management Office SRIP/S - Small Reservoir Irrigation Project/ System TGI - Target Group Identification TL/IMS - Team Leader/Irrigation Management Specialist TSAG - Turnout Service Area Group


vii May 2003

Executive Summary The Can-Asujan Small Reservoir Irrigation Project (SRIP) in Cebu in the Central Visayas Region is a core sub-project of the Southern Philippine Irrigation Sector Project (SPISP), which will irrigate an existing dry land farming area supporting about 1,370 households and will improve the reliability of food supply and raise farmer incomes in the area, many of which are at or below the poverty level. The sub-project consists of two main components: (i) a reservoir, built on the Can-Asujan River, and (ii) a lower gravity-fed irrigation service area of about 772 ha fed from the upstream reservoir. A 25-m hard fill dam will be built in a narrow, steep sided valley section of the Can-Asujan River to create the reservoir. It will cover approximately 32.85 ha of land at conservation level and about 7 ha at minimum operating level as well as temporarily affect some 15 ha of land at the dam construction site. The land areas affected are located in two barangays, namely Can-Asujan and Calidngan, of the Municipality of Carcar, some 40 km south of Cebu City. In the irrigation service area, approximately 6.7116 ha are subject of ROW acquisition for the construction of irrigation facilities. The proposed submersion will directly affect 182 households in both the proposed submerged area and at the dam construction site who are either cultivators or residents located in the affected areas as well as users of communal resources or facilities at the said sites. Of the 182 APs, 129 are cultivators and/or residents of the affected plots while 53 are absentee-claimants. Dislocation and displacement will take mainly the form of loss of agricultural and residential lands (permanent and temporary) due to the proposed submersion of 32.85 ha of land and temporary use of 12.58 ha during construction of the dam and ancillary facilities, total or partial loss of residential and some other temporary or permanent structures, loss of supplemental income source due to dislocation from the land being cultivated as well as loss of access to communal resources and facilities. Loss of income as derived from agricultural activities on the land acquired for the reservoir will be minimal as the survey of the project-affected families (PAFs) and project-affected persons (PAPs) indicated that only about 11 percent of household income is derived from the cultivation of land. Also, during dismantling of houses and transfer of the affected households to the relocation sites, there will be an income loss for a brief period of time when household heads and working members who will be on leave from their regular employment and source of livelihood, are engaged in the dismantling of structures and relocation activities. Furthermore, at the proposed irrigation service areas, right-of-way (ROW) acquisition shall be undertaken for the construction of canals and other irrigation facilities, which will require the provision of approximately 6.2338 ha of land as equity and/or donation to the project (for beneficiary farmers) and expropriation and payment of the required lot parcels from 464 landowners and farmers. They are the subject of the Land Acquisition and Resettlement Plan (LARP) of the Can-asujan SRIP. Civil works and construction activities and the eventual submersion of residential and agricultural lands for the reservoir and buffer zones will be confined to the 32.85 ha of proposed submerged areas in Bgy. Can-Asujan and Calidngan and 12.58 ha for the dam construction in Bgy. Can-asujan. To minimize further


viii May 2003

adverse impact, all construction activities will be coordinated and synchronized to ensure the harvest of crops and recovery of other useful products before the flooding of the area. Relocation and compensation payment shall be undertaken first before starting with the civil works activities. A socio-economic survey and inventory of assets and properties within the affected areas in the proposed reservoir and in the proposed dam site were undertaken in January-March 2001 and July-August 2002, respectively, the results of which will serve as a benchmark for determining the impact of the Project on the PAFs and the basis for formulating mitigating measures included as part of this LARP. The LARP was prepared in accordance with the Bill of Rights of the Constitution of the Republic of the Philippines and other legal enactments relevant to resettlement and relocation, the NIA-SPISP/PGAN Resettlement Policy and Program Framework and the Asian Development Bank (ADB) requirements and guidelines on resettlement based on its latest version on the Handbook on Resettlement. The proposed dam and reservoir areas are classified as timberland area. Timberland cannot be titled but because of population intrusion in many areas, its use and occupation is being tolerated and condoned by the government through a program of community stewardship and leasehold. However, the affected area is not covered by any stewardship or leasehold arrangements whether individual or communal; nonetheless, there are 182 households (148 in the proposed water reservoir area and 34 in the dam construction site of which 10 also have properties in the reservoir area) and who had encroached and established their residence therein and have cultivated the land for agriculture. Most of these APs are resident farmers deriving a portion of their household income from the cultivation of the occupied land, while a few are residents only in the area. Of those who cultivate and reside on the land, some lay claim to the right to use the occupied parcel; however, a number have merely been entrusted to cultivate it by the original cultivator of the land, who now reside somewhere else, and merely get a share of the harvest from the present cultivator. The latter however, in most cases continue to pay tax declaration to the local government for the improvement on the land. There are also six communal resources and facilities (2 chapels, access road and spillway, 1 water spring box, and 2 domestic water supply source) in the proposed submerged area, which will be submerged. Some households outside the affected area depend on these resources and will stand to lose access to and use of them. Furthermore, right-of-way (ROW) acquisition in the irrigation service area will involve approximately 6.2338 ha of land of which 5.6587 ha are privately owned while the rest (.5751 ha) are public land. Of the total ROW requirement, 2.0631 ha has been donated, 1.5606 ha had been provided as equity to the project (a requirement for SPISP development), 1.6544 ha permitted easement in privately-owned lands, 0.5751 ha permitted easement in public lands, and 0.3806 ha recommended for expropriation after failure of the negotiation. The average


ix May 2003

market value of land in the area is P150 per sqm. The land provided as equity, donation and for compensation were valued on the given fair market value. The PAFs of the reservoir and dam sites as well as the ROW acquisition in the service area are the subjects of the Can-asujan SRIP LARP. The full-range of resettlement and compensation package for the PAFs will include the following options:

• Titled replacement land (equivalent to 60 percent of the ROW acquired lot1), of which 25 percent of the purchase cost will have to be amortized over a period of 15-25 years as the case maybe and treated as the PAF’s counterpart or equity.

• Core house and assistance in the reconstruction of the houses. • Relocation and transfer assistance. • Compensation for the titled land at fair market value. • Compensation for the loss of structures (residential and others). • Compensation for loss of land improvements like crops and others. • One-time disturbance compensation for every affected household. • Income restoration for lost income during the relocation and transfer period. • Livelihood training. • Access to credit facility and livelihood development fund.

Entitlement to particular options in the resettlement and compensation package will need to meet given criteria. In the proposed submerged and dam areas (which has been verified to be timberland), those who will lose the land they are cultivating as well as the land where their houses have been constructed are entitled to full resettlement, compensation and rehabilitation; they will be given replacement land which will be developed (provided access road, power and water) by NIA, a core house, relocation and transfer assistance, disturbance compensation, payment on the assessed value for the improvement on the land, income restoration allowance during the relocation period, livelihood training and access to livelihood fund. Those who will lose their farm and residential land but have other plots outside the affected area to transfer to and opted only to relocate their houses to the unaffected lots are entitled to the rest of the items in the package available to the re-settlers except for the replacement land. The cultivators but non-residents who will lose the farmland but are cultivating other plots outside the affected area can avail only of compensation on the assessed value on land improvement, disturbance fee as well as the rehabilitation measures. Those who are non-resident and non-cultivator but have proven user right to the land (e.g., payment of tax declaration are entitled to a portion of the compensation on land improvement as well as the disturbance fee shared with their entrusted resident cultivators. Majority of the APS has already agreed on the sharing of compensation, based on

1 Based on the Consultant’s (Agricultural Economist) economic analysis, the recommended size- ratio (60-65%) of replacement land will be more than sufficient to cover for the lost agricultural income from the original plot as well as cover the amortization cost and leave sufficient savings for the household given the current income and expenditure pattern.


x May 2003

a ratio ranging from 30:70 to 50:50 for claimant and cultivator, respectively. For those who have not reached agreement on the sharing, the amount intended for compensation of the improvement shall be deposited in escrow as determined by the court and the property concerned shall be expropriated. In the irrigation service area, beneficiary farmers are required to provide as part of their project equity the value of the land acquired for ROW; land valuation will be based on the fair market value or zonal value, whichever is higher. If the value of the ROW acquired from a particular beneficiary farmer exceeds that of his required equity contribution, whatever difference or excess will be treated as advance payment to his dues on future irrigation service fee (ISF). The non-beneficiary landowners who are not willing to donate or sell the land subject to ROW acquisition will undergo expropriation proceeding; however, cash compensation based on the fair market value of the land will be deposited in escrow account per the court decision and eventually available. NIA will provide replacement for the lost communal resource and properties. For the road cum spillway, which will be submerged, NIA will construct an access road from the point just beyond the submerged portion of the road, build a 40 m bridge spanning a narrow point in the upstream portion of the reservoir to connect at other side to the access road leading to the barangay center. Also, the lost domestic water sources will be replaced with three deep wells. Furthermore, one chapel in each barangay will be constructed to replace the ones lost. LARP preparation had been ongoing since mid-2000. Implementation will start with the acquisition and development of the resettlement site beginning January 2002. Before dismantling and transfer of any structure is undertaken in the affected area, compensation payment for the various losses should have been settled first. The PAFs/PAPs had requested that they be compensated first before any dismantling or relocation activities are undertaken. Payment of compensation will be made by NIA direct to the concerned PAPs, where both husband and wife, if applicable, will receive the compensation and sign an acknowledgement and a disclaimer. There are also activities, which should occur before actual LARP implementation can begin and they are as follows:

• Approval by the NIA management and concurrence of the ADB of the LARP and its policy framework;

• Agreement between the NIA, the municipal government of Carcar and the PAFs representatives on the LARP to govern all activities with regard to land acquisition, compensation and resettlement in the sub-project;

• Establishment of working groups to assist in the implementation of the LARP; and

• Community mobilization and public information campaign. The Can-Asujan SRIP Land Acquisition and Resettlement Plan will require approximately PHP 53,167,340M for the acquisition and development of relocation sites and compensation for lost assets and properties as well as other rehabilitation-related costs.


xi May 2003

NIA will provide the necessary resources, manpower and budget to cover all costs related to LARP implementation including payment of compensation and allowances to PAFs/PAPs, monitoring and management. The NIA-PIO Cebu will be primarily responsible for coordinating the implementation of the LARP including resettlement site development, relocation, and compensation payment. It will closely liaise with the municipal government, the working groups and the organization of the re-settlers to ensure that other interventions to uplift the living standard and quality of life of the PAFs/PAPs are undertaken. A non-governmental organization (NGO) maybe contracted to assist the PAFs in the implementation of a livelihood development program. The Consultant Team shall monitor the implementation of the LARP in the course of the Project life while external evaluation will be undertaken by an external body, preferably a NGO to assess whether the stated objectives of the LARP had been achieved.


1 May 2003

1.0 INTRODUCTION 1. This Report provides the Asian Development Bank (ADB) and the Central Project Management Office (CPMO) of the Southern Philippines Irrigation Sector Project (SPISP) of the National Irrigation Administration (NIA) with the Land Acquisition and Resettlement Plan (LARP) for project-affected families (PAFs) and project affected persons (PAPs) of the Can-Asujan Small Reservoir Irrigation Project (SRIP).

2. The LARP includes the following elements:

i) Needs and concerns of project affected families and persons (PAF/Ps) - alternatives and options are presented that will permit the PAF/Ps to accommodate their individual resettlement concerns at minimum cost to them;

ii) Policies and procedures from the SPISP-NIA and PGAN

Resettlement Policy and Program Framework (RPPF) that will provide resettlement assistance to improve the living standard of the PAF/Ps;

iii) Recommendations from the various offices of the National and Local

Governments;

iv) Lessons learned from previous resettlement activities of the NIA and the LGU; and

v) Guidance provided by various Bank and Government policies, laws

and regulations. 1.1 Description of the Project 3. The Can-Asujan SRIP, a core sub-project of the SPISP is in Cebu in Central Visayas Region (see Figure 1 on the SPISP subproject areas and Figure 2 for the Can-Asujan SRIP Location Map). Cebu is mainly a mountainous island-province with a very limited area suitable for irrigation. The economy of Cebu is agriculture-based with majority of the population dependent on agriculture for their source of income. The majority of the farmers are dependent on rain-fed agriculture from poor upland soil and the long dry season has created an unreliable condition for food production. 4. The construction of a small reservoir will provide water to a gravity-fed irrigation service area of about 772 ha benefiting some 1,370 households in the municipality of Carcar, about 40 km south of Cebu City. The system will be sufficient to maintain at least two crops of rice per year and in selected areas, support the cultivation of high value vegetable crops such as eggplant, okra and string beans and the like. With water available all year round, crop production is optimized. Thus, the sub-project will assure food availability and help increase the income level of the beneficiary farmers and alleviate poverty situation in the rural areas of Carcar.

a a t

g i y

a t

AKLAN

CAPIZ

ANTIQUE ILOILO

NEGROSOCCIDENTAL

NEGROSORIENTAL

GUIMARASCEBU

BOHOL

SOUTHERNLEYTE

LEYTE

SAMAR

NORTHERNSAMAR

EASTERNSAMAR

BILIRAN

AGUSANDELNORTE

SURIGAODEL SUR

AGUSANDEL SUR

MISAMISORIENTAL

BUKIDNON

DAVAODEL NORTE

LANAODELNORTE

NORTHCOTABATO

MAGUINDANAO

LANAODEL SUR

SULTANKUDARAT

SOUTHCOTABATO

DAVAODELSUR

DAVAOORIENTAL

MISAMISOCCIDENTAL

ZAMBOANGADELNORTE

ZAMBOANGADEL SUR

BASILAN

SULU

TAWI-TAWI

Cebu City

Ilo-ilo City

Roxas City

Ormoc City

ButuanCity

Marawi City

DipologCity

Bacolod City

Gingoog City

TaclobanCity

CalbayogCity

Oroquieta City

Tagbilaran City

Malaybalay City

CatbaloganCity

Dumaguete City

Kidapawan City

Gen.Santos City

Cagayande Oro City

ZamboangaCi ty

Tagum Cityt

Davao Ci y

REGION VI

REGION VII

REGION X

CARAGA

REGION IX

ARMM

REGION XI

REGION VIII

REGION XII

LAKE MAINIT

LAKE LANAO

LOCATION MAPLOCATION MAP

Small Reservoir Irrigation System

National Irrigation System

Communal Irrigation System

Non-core Sub-project

Core Sub-project

National Irrigation Administration National Irrigation Administration Southern Philippines Irrigation Sector Project Southern Philippines Irrigation Sector Project

( N I A ( N I A -- S P I S P )S P I S P )

MAGBALLO SRIP

CAN-ASUJAN SRIP

DAUIN SRIP

KANAWAY-SAN ROQUE CIS

CANTILAN NIS

CABADBARAN NIS

CALAYAGON CIS

ACLAN-AMONTAY CIS

GIBONG NIP

GIBONG RIGHT BANK SUBPROJECT

LOGUM NIS

Kabankalan, Negros Occidental(Service Area = 800 hectares)

Carcar, Cebu(Service Area = 772 hectares)

Dauin, Negros Oriental

(Service Area = 800 hectares)

Kitcharao, Agusan del Norte(Service Area = 107 hectares)

Cantilan, Surigao del Sur(Service Area = 2,500 hectares)

Cabadbaran, Agusan del Norte

(Service Area = 2,450 hectares)

Buenavista, Agusan del Norte(Service Area = 250 hectares)

Nasipit, Agusan del Norte(Service Area = 130 hectares)

Prosperidad, Agusan del Sur

(Service Area = 1,400 hectares)

Veruela, Agusan del Sur

(Service Area = 665 hectares)

RUGNAN NISLumba-Bayabao,Lanao del Sur(Service Area = 3,050 hectares)

(Service Area = 2,583 hectares) * includes 665 ha GIBONG LEFT BANK SUBPROJECT(Service Area = 2,167 hectares )

BAOBO NIS(Service Area = 1,900 hectares)

Map of the Philippines

N

Figure 1. Location Map of SPISP Subprojects


4 May 2003

5. The sub-project will tap water from the Can-Asujan River, a small seasonal river in Carcar, with a 40 sq km cleared watershed and with an annual discharge of 0.98 cms, at the proposed dam site. A 25-m hard fill dam and a spillway will be built in a narrow, steep-sided valley section of the river to create a small reservoir, which at conservation level (spillway crest) will have the capacity to impound 2.45 million cubic meters (MCM) of water and at a minimum operating level, 0.15 MCM. 6. The reservoir will be contained within a single un-branched channel in a narrow section of the river, where the dam and the spillway could be constructed. At conservation level the reservoir will submerge approximately 32.85 ha of land (see Figure 3), which will be the subject of the land acquisition and resettlement plan (LARP). In addition, during the construction of the dam, approximately 12.54 ha of land in the dam construction site will be affected resulting in the temporary displacement of a number of households and the loss of the improvement on the land. 7. In addition to the reservoir and the dam the project will entail the construction of a canal system in the reservoir service area. Right-of-Way (ROW) acquisition for the construction of canals and irrigation facilities in this area will amount, approximately to 6.2338 ha of land. 1.2 Financial Aspects of the LAR Compensation Process 8. An important factor that is essential to understand the LAR compensation strategy adopted for the project rests on the way civil works financing is to be shared between Government, ADB and beneficiary communities that is 75% for Government and ADB and 25% for the beneficiaries. The beneficiaries share of the civil works budget will be paid through fees by each single beneficiary in proportion the area of their serviced plots. 9. Based on this scheme LAR impacts affecting beneficiaries will be discounted as equity from their fees. LAR for the project will thus entail a pecuniary payment only when the value at market rate of the land lost by one project beneficiary offsets the amount he/she has they have to pay in fees as a contribution to project finances. 1.3 Types of Impacts/ Steps for Mitigation of Impacts 10. The sub-project has the potential to improve food security in the area and increase the level of income of the beneficiary farmers and contribute to the local economy. The farmers at present rely primarily on rain-fed agriculture. With long spell of dry season in the area, crop production is not assured. The project will provide a regular supply of water, enabling at least two crops of rice per year and a continuous cultivation of high value vegetable crops. Together with positive impacts, however the project will also require land acquisition and therefore affect negatively a number of families. Impacts and land acquisition strategies differ in relation to project component and in relation to the degree the Project affected Families (PAF) directly benefit from the positive impacts. The two main components here considered are the dam/reservoir and the canal system to be built in the service area.


5 May 2003

11. In order to assess the impacts of the project ad hoc topographic surveys and plot mapping were undertaken in the proposed reservoir and dam construction site to determine its relative size and plot boundaries as basis for assessment and valuation of improvement therein. Improvement in terms of structures and crops in each plot was also inventoried. Owners, cultivators and residents of the land were interviewed to determine their socio-economic status. Land classification was verified with the Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR). 1.3.1 Dam/ Reservoir Impacts 12. The construction of the dam and reservoir will result into the permanent loss of around 32.85 ha of land, which will be eventually submerged and temporarily affect approximately 12.54 ha of land for the dam construction site. The nature of the impact is the permanent or temporary loss of agricultural and residential lands in the reservoir area and dam construction site and the total or partial loss of residential and other structures as well as crops and trees therein. In addition to these heavier impacts there will be minimal loss of income as derived from the cultivation of the land. Per survey result, PAFs derive only about 11 percent of household income from land cultivation. Small short-term income losses will also occur during the relocation and transfer of the Affected Families (AF). As the settlers in dam or reservoir affected areas are not direct beneficiaries of the project compensation for these impacts will be provided to various categories of PAFs in full without equity contribution and through a combination of land for land and cash provisions. These provisions will also reflect the fact that these settlers are occupying illegally an area classified by the Department of Environment and Natural Resources as “Timberland”1. 1.3.2 Service Area Impacts 13. The construction of main and lateral canals and ancillary facilities in the irrigation service area will require around 6.2338 ha of land for ROW. The nature of impact is in the form of loss of land and loss of potential income from the land as well as the improvement on the land. PAF losses in this area will vary from minimal to substantial according to the type of canal that causes the impact. As agreed in the course of an intensive consultation process all direct beneficiaries in this area will provide the land affected by ROW acquisition in form of equity as explained in section 1.2 above. It is noted that in no case it occurred that the value of the land lost by a PAF exceeded the value of the contributions fees due for project financing. 14. In the case of non-beneficiary farmers affected by ROW acquisition non-equity mechanism will be adopted and the impacts will be compensated in full at market rates. An exception to this general principle are a number of non-direct beneficiaries members of the irrigation association affected by very small land losses that have voluntarily chosen to give up their land for free.

1 Timberland is an old term that continues to be used to describe public lands (lands owned by the Government). Generally, these are lands with slopes of 18 percent or more and covered with forest for protection or production. Timberlands are administered by DENR.


7 May 2003

1.4 Rehabilitation and Impact Mitigation Measures 15. To minimize the negative impact, measures will be taken to ensure that the farmers within the affected areas would have enough time to continue farming their respective plots and harvest their crops before actual construction and reservoir submersion begin. PAF/Ps will be informed of the schedule of implementation including the civil works. Civil works at the dam site and reservoir area will not commence unless payment for compensation and relocation had been effected. Full disclosure of the impact and the mitigating measures will be undertaken. 16. During the dismantling and transfer of structures to the relocation sites, there will be possible income loss for a brief period of time. Household heads and working members of the household will be compensated for the loss of income for the time they spend on relocation activities. 17. As part of the rehabilitation measure, organization and training as well as technical and financial assistance for the APs will be provided. 1.5 Objectives of the LARP 18. Economic, social and environmental problems are often aggravated because of the involuntary and the unintended displacement of people by the development project. Displacement often ends up in the dismantling of production systems where assets and income sources of affected households and individuals are lost; dislocated people transferred to an alien location without the necessary preparation and consideration of absorptive capacity could have disastrous effect on the environment; or social and community networks are disturbed such as the dispersion of kin group, breakdown of traditional authority or cultural identity, often result in disruptive conflicts and loss of identity and social commitment. The Can-asujan SRIP would impact not only the communities and households within the irrigation service areas but also those in the proposed reservoir and dam areas. 19. The primary objective of the LARP for the Can-Asujan SRIP is to minimize and mitigate the negative impacts of the project through the provision of compensation, relocation and rehabilitation assistance to people directly affected, with such assistance eventually contributing to an improved living standard of the PAFs. 20. The LARP aims to accomplish the following:

(i) Present a strategy to achieve the objectives of the NIA-SPISP/PGAN Resettlement Policy and Program Framework;

(ii) Provide a plan for implementation of the stated strategies to ensure

timely acquisition of assets, payment of compensation and delivery of other benefits to project affected persons;

(iii) Ensure that the Plan enables the PAF/Ps to improve and/or maintain

their income level and living standard from pre-project level;


8 May 2003

(iv) Define the principles and mechanics for public consultation and information campaign;

(v) Estimate resources required to implement the recommended

interventions; and

(vi) Provide a plan for monitoring and supervision of LARP implementation.


9 May 2003

2.0 LAND ACQUISITION AND RESETTLEMENT PLAN (LARP) REQUIREMENT

2.1 NIA-SPISP/PGAN Resettlement Policy and Program Framework 21. The rehabilitation, construction and development of SPISP subprojects and their irrigation systems will require the acquisition of areas within the proposed irrigation systems for ROW for canals, pipeline, hydraulic structure, and access/maintenance roads and water impounding systems. These acquisitions could result into the potential loss of agricultural and residential lands, and the improvements therein as well as the possible displacement of households. Whenever possible, dislocation and relocation will be avoided. Nonetheless, in cases where this is unavoidable, the NIA-SPISP/PGAN Resettlement Policy and Program Framework (RPPF) has been formulated to provide the basis to adequately address resettlement issues likely to emerge from the acquisition of lands for irrigation development and improvement, whether relocation of PAFs is required or not. The RPPF is utilized as basis for the development of the land acquisition and resettlement plan (LARP) for the Can-asujan SRIP. 2.2 Pre-condition to Civil Works Implementation 22. Before construction can begin for the Can-asujan dam and reservoir, the LARP should be formulated and implemented so that PAF/Ps can be compensated, relocated and rehabilitated. Based on the impact assessment undertaken for the sub-project, PAF/Ps were identified, census was undertaken and the scope of impact assessed through surveys of farm and residential lots affected and the inventory and valuation of affected assets therein and the type of resettlement and rehabilitation issues that need to be addressed. 2.3 Rationale for a Full LARP for the Can-asujan SRIP 23. Following the NIA-SPISP/PGAN RPPF and the ADB guidelines on resettlement, the Can-asujan SRIP requires a full resettlement plan given the scope of the resettlement issues encountered. There are 182 PAFs, which will be affected either temporarily or permanently by the project within the proposed reservoir and dam areas; in the irrigation service areas, some 464 farmer beneficiaries and non-beneficiary landowners will be affected by the ROW requirement. This implies a significant resettlement program; accordingly, a full-scale LARP needs to formulated and implemented.


10 May 2003

3.0 LEGAL BACKGROUND 3.1 NIA-SPISP RPPF and ADB Resettlement Guidelines 24. To respond to the resettlement issues identified in the SPISP implementation, the SPISP-NIA and PGAN Resettlement Policy and Program Framework (detailed in a separate Report) has been formulated and promulgated to guide the manner by which the individual subproject will address these issues. The principles outlined in the Asian Development Bank’s (ADB) “Handbook on Resettlement”: A Guide to Good Practice (ADB: 1998), “Involuntary Resettlement” (ADB, 1995) and EO 1035 on Providing the Procedures and Guidelines for the Expeditious Acquisition by the Government of Private Real Properties or Rights thereon for Infrastructure and other Government Projects form the basis in preparing the RPPF. The principles and the resettlement measures stemming from there will apply to all subprojects of NIA-SPISP and PGAN and will require the definition and formulation of a subproject-specific Land Acquisition and Resettlement Plan (LARP). 25. The LARP had incorporated the following elements: (i) Recommendations of the working groups represented by representatives from various departments of the central and local government units and the PAF/Ps; (ii) Lessons learned from previous resettlement initiatives of different line agencies and the local government units; and (iii) the felt needs of the PAF/Ps. 26. The RPPF outlines the specific guidelines and procedures to prepare the compensation, relocation and rehabilitation schemes summarized as follows:

a) Resettlement and land acquisition will be minimized as much as possible. Where land acquisition is unavoidable, the system will be designed to minimize adverse impact, especially on the vulnerable groups.

b) PAF/Ps will be compensated, relocated and rehabilitated, if required

so as to improve their standard of living, income earning capacity and production capacity, or at least to restore them to pre-Project levels.

c) All PAF/Ps residing, cultivating, or having rights over resources

within the Project area after the conduct of the community census and survey are entitled to compensation for their losses and/or income rehabilitation. Lack of legal right or title to the assets (land, structures and /or crops) taken for the Project will not bar the PAP from receiving compensation, rehabilitation and relocation measures to achieve the objectives set forth under this Policy. But in case the land to be acquired for ROW is classified as public land, concerned PAF/Ps will need to provide equity contribution for the purchase of land replacement; such equity maybe amortized over a period of time (15-25 years), which will not constitute a financial burden to the PAFs. All previous claims and unresolved issues related to resettlement or compensation in the area of each subproject,


11 May 2003

including the outstanding claims arising out of the agrarian reform under RA 3844, RA 6389 and RA 6657, will be resolved in accordance with applicable Philippine laws and regulations, prior to initiating any new land acquisition measures on the respective subproject.

d) The means of resettlement are: compensation at equivalent

replacement costs for lands, houses and other structures, replacement agricultural land of at least equal productive capacity, replacement of residential land of equal size, dislocation allowance and transition subsidies, compensation for assets, and appropriate rehabilitation measure to compensate for loss of livelihood and income from the cultivation of the land.

e) PAFs required to relocate due to the acquisition of their houses by

the project will be provided full assistance for transportation and re-establishment of their home and will be provided a dislocation allowance, in addition to provision of residential land and the replacement cost of their home (refer to (d) above).

f) Replacement residential and agricultural land will be as close as

possible to the land that was lost and acceptable to the PAF/P. g) Cash compensation may be paid in lieu of land-for-land

compensation provided that: (i) PAF/P receives fair market value for the land and assets on it plus transaction costs, without any deductions for depreciation; (ii) prior agreement has been reached on land acquisition through a negotiated settlement at a rate acceptable to the PAP/PAF, but in no case shall it be less than the fair market value plus transaction costs; (iii) land is not available in the proximity of the Project area; (iv) PAF/Ps willingly accepts cash compensation for land; and (v) cash compensation is accompanied by appropriate rehabilitation measures which together with project benefits results in the restoration of PAF/Ps incomes to at least pre-Project levels.

h) PAF/Ps whose lands are acquired for construction of infrastructure

that is directly related to SPISP implementation may apply their compensation for loss of land to their equity contribution for construction and or rehabilitation of the subproject. The equity contribution for such lands will be based upon the fair market value plus transaction costs.

i) PAF/Ps who are Project beneficiaries and who have a significant

portion (greater than 20 percent) of their land acquired for ROW are entitled to compensation for the loss of land (the portion in excess of 20 percent) and rehabilitation for loss of income potential on said proportion. Rehabilitation is negotiated with the PAF/Ps and may include, replacement lands of equal productive potential, training and support for new livelihood activities, and compensation for loss


12 May 2003

of income. PAF/Ps who are non-project beneficiaries, shall also be covered by the aforementioned provisions.

j) The resettlement transition period will be minimized with land-for-

land and/or cash compensation provided to the PAF/Ps, and the rehabilitation measures completed prior to the expected start-up date of civil works in the respective subprojects.

k) Resettlement plans will be implemented following consultations with

the PAF/Ps and will have the endorsement of the PAF/Ps. l) The previous level of community services and access to resources

will be maintained or improved after resettlement. m) Any acquisition of, or restriction on access to resources owned or

managed by PAF/Ps as common property will be mitigated with arrangements ensuring access of those PAF/Ps to equivalent resources on a continuing basis.

n) Financial and physical resources for resettlement and rehabilitation

will be made available as and when required and altogether prior to land dispossession, displacement or house demolition.

o) Resettlement programs will include adequate institutional

arrangements to ensure effective and timely design, planning and implementation of resettlement and rehabilitation measures.

p) Adequate arrangements for effective and timely internal and external

monitoring will be made on implementation of all resettlement measures. An independent agency/organization (not related to PGAN, NIA, or Department of Agriculture) will be contracted to conduct external monitoring activities.

q) To avoid influx of outsiders and speculators, there shall be a cut-off

date set for eligibility for inclusion in the LARP. Normally, this is set as the date immediately after the survey to establish the size and location of the affected lots as well as the census of the concerned PAFs had been undertaken.

r) Provision of compensation for land, houses and replacement of

other communal assets as well as the implementation of resettlement will need to be concluded prior to the physical take-over of land, houses and communal assets as part of the ROW requirement of the Project.


13 May 2003

3.2 Eligibility 27. The PAF and PAP include any household and person who at the cut-off date of the sub-project were located within the affected areas and its components or part thereof, and would have the adverse impact on the following:

(i) standard of living; (ii) right, title or interest in any house, land (including agricultural and

residential) or any improvements therein whether permanent or semi-permanent acquired or possessed in full or in part; or

(iii) business, occupation, place of work or residence.

28. PAPs in this context will refer to Project Affected Persons (PAP) and consists of all members of a household residing under one roof and operating as a single economic unit, who are adversely affected by the Project, or any of its components. For resettlement purposes, project affected persons will be considered as members of Project Affected Families (PAF). 29. The eligibility criteria include the following:

(i) PAF/Ps who will stand to lose totally or partially the right of ownership and/or use of arable lands in the proposed reservoir area, dam construction site and/or irrigation service areas;

(ii) PAFs who will also stand to lose their residential lands;

(iii) PAFs who stand to lose residential and other structures in the

affected areas;

(iv) PAF/Ps who stand to lose standing trees and crops on the affected lands;

(v) PAF/Ps who stand to lose access to communal resources and

facilities such as source of water supply, road, bridges and the like; and

(vi) PAFs whose source of livelihood and income is disrupted and/or

interrupted. 3.3 Cut-off Date 30. The cut-off date set on the eligibility for inclusion in the Can-asujan LARP was the date immediately after the conduct of the plot mapping and the census of PAF/Ps in the affected areas. Those who were not in identified and included in the census will not qualify for inclusion in the LARP. 31. The census and baseline surveys, which were carried out prior to the preparation of the LARP served as the basis for determining the cut-off date for


14 May 2003

the eligibility in the Can-asujan LARP. This was done to prevent possible speculation and spurious claim that may result due to the implementation of the Can-asujan SRIP. The census and asset inventory were carried out between January-March 2001 in the proposed submerged area and in August 2002 in the dam site. Therefore, for purposes of entitlements to project affected families (PAFs) and project-affected persons (PAPs) in these sites, the cut-off dates were 01 April 2001 for the PAF/Ps in the submerged area and 31 August 2002 for PAF/Ps in the dam site. The cut-off date for inclusion in the LARP of PAF/Ps within the irrigation service area was mid-March 2003 when ROW negotiation is deemed finalized. Concerned APs who are not willing to donate the ROW required plot and/or are not willing to sell the concerned plot shall be subject of expropriation proceedings.


15 May 2003

4.0 BASELINE INFORMATION AND SOCIOECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS OF PROJECT AFFECTED PERSONS/FAMILIES

4.1 PAPs/PAFs, their Location and Scope of Impacts 32. The project will have adverse impact on a total of 646 PAFs, of which 148 are from the proposed reservoir area, 34 from the dam area (of which 10 also have plots in the reservoir area) while 158 and 306 are beneficiary farmers and non-beneficiary landowners, respectively, from the irrigation service area. The 182 PAFs from both the submerged and dam area (see Annex A for the complete list) will stand to lose approximately 45 ha of residential and agricultural land as well as its improvement such as houses and other structures, perennial crops and trees; in addition there are communal facilities from which the community outside the affected area will lose access to such as water supply facilities, chapels and road. Table 1 below provides the list of losses that will be experienced in the submerged and dam areas.

Table 1. Summary of Affected households and Assets, Submerged and

Dam Construction Areas Affected Households, Assets and Properties

Submerged Area

Dam Area

Both

Total

Affected Lands 32.85 ha 12.54 ha - 45.38 ha No. of Affected HH 148 24 10 182 HH No. of Affected Residential Structures

49 houses

12

-

61 houses

No. of Storage Facility 17 1 - 18 No. of animal pens 18 - - 18 Sari-sari stores 4 - - 4 Water tank 1 - - 1 Chapel 3 - - 3 Water Source 3 - - 3 Road/spillway 1 - - 1 Trees and Crops Per Inventory Per Inventory Per Inventory Source: Socio-economic Survey and Asset Inventory, SPISP, 2001 and 2002. 33. The project reservoir will submerge approximately 32.85 ha of land, composed of 156 plots, which are cultivated and/or resided in by 148 PAFs. Improvement on these plots were inventoried and assessed. Permanent and semi-permanent crops were surveyed and valuated while structures like houses, storage sheds, animal pens and the like were counted, measured and valuated on the basis of the current cost of materials and labor. Data were included in the corresponding files for the individual PAFs2. Of the 148 PAFs, full resettlement and compensation for land improvement is required for 41 cultivators and /or residents only, compensation for structures, trees and crops is required for 71 non-resident cultivators and 53 absentee land claimants while compensation for lost crops and existing structures as well as assistance in the transfer of residence is required for 17 resident cultivators. Per inventory, in addition to crops and

2 A file was created and contains the information collected and assessed concerning each PAF.


16 May 2003

trees, 49 houses, 17 storage facilities, 18 animal pens, 4 commercial structures (sari-sari stores), 3 chapels, a water tank and an access road will also be affected. 34. The dam construction will temporarily affect some 12.5378 ha of land cultivated and/or resided in by some 34 PAFs (of which 10 PAFs also have plots in the proposed reservoir area). In addition to crops and trees, there are 12 houses and 1 storage structure that will need to be moved somewhere else. 35. The Project staff verified the land classification of the affected area and the Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR) has confirmed that the entire 32.85 ha submerged area and 12.5378 ha dam construction site are part of the classified timberland area within the Can-Asujan-Calidngan district. It is a declared forest zone of the watershed, which is non-alienable and disposable and in principle cannot be titled and settled. No community forestry stewardship or leasehold had been awarded for the affected area. The 182 cultivators and/or residents identified therein are considered “informal dwellers”. However, many of these informal dwellers have occupied the area for an average of 30 years already. 36. The 772-ha irrigation service area on the other hand is composed of 369 ha of rice land and 403 ha of vegetable area. The rice lands are located in Bgys. Liburon, Poblacion 1 & 3, Bolinawan and Ocana while the vegetable areas are in Bgy. Can-asujan, Valladolid, Perellos, Tuyom and part of Liburon. Approximately 6.2338 ha of the total 772.0 ha irrigation service area will be acquired for ROW. A total of 464 farmers and/or landowners are affected by ROW acquisition in the service area, of which 158 are beneficiary farmers while 306 are non-beneficiary landowners. In the rice area, there are 24 beneficiary farmers who are affected of which 21 provided approximately 0.4577 ha as equity and 3 allowed easement in 0.0756 ha; on the other hand, there are 120 non-beneficiary landowners who are affected of which 67 has donated to the IA approximately 1.2415 ha for ROW, 43 allowed easement in approximately 0.7503 ha. However, approximately 0.1644 ha needs to be expropriated from 10 landowners. In the vegetable area, on the other hand, 127 beneficiary farmers had provided 1.1029 ha as equity, 7 allowed easement in approximately 0.0474 ha while 186 non-beneficiary landowners are affected with 84 donating to the IA approximately 0.8216 ha, another 80 allowed easement in approximately 0.7811 ha while approximately 0.2162 ha will be expropriated from 22 landowners. Furthermore, around 0.5751 ha has been permitted easement in public lands in both the rice and vegetable areas. See Annex B for the complete list. 37. The summary of ROW acquisition in the irrigation service area is shown in Table 2 below.


17 May 2003

Table 2. Summary of ROW Acquisition in the Irrigation Service Areas SERVICE

AREA No of

Farmers Total Land (ha)

Ave Market Value

(P/sqm)

Equity (sqm)

Donation (sqm)

Easement (sqm)

For Exprop (sqm)

Req. ROW GRAND

TOTAL (sqm) BENEFICIARY FARMERS

Rice Area 24 37.73 150 4,577.10 756.20 5,333.30 Vegetable Area 134 127.19 150 11,028.90 473.60 11,502.50 Subtotal 158 164.92 15,606.00 1,229.80 16,835.80

NONBENEFICIARY LANDOWNERS Rice Area 120 167.12 150 12,414.90 7,502.60 1,644.20 21,561.70 Vegetable Area 186 208.90 150 8,216.20 7,810.80 2,162.40 18,189.40 Subtotal 306 376.03 20,631.10 15,313.40 3,806.60 39,751.10

PUBLIC LANDS Rice Area - - 150 - - 2,563.40 - 2,563.40 Vegetable Area - - 150 - - 3,187.60 - 3,187.60 Subtotal - - - - 5,751.00 - 5,751.00 GRAND TOTAL 464 540.95 150 15,606.00 20,631.10 22,294.20 3,806.60 62,337.90

Source: Cebu-PIO, 2003. 38. The proportion of individual plots of land acquired for ROW of the subproject does not exceed the 20 percent of total cut-off limit. (The RPPF requires the inclusion in the compensation and rehabilitation measures of those PAFs if 20 percent or more of their total landholding is affected by the ROW acquisition). Payment for ROW acquisition is set at the fair market value of the land in the area. In the service area, the average fair market value of land was reported to be P150 per sq. m. No PAP has provided land for the ROW requirement whose fair market value exceeds his equity contribution requirement. 4.2 Socio-economic Status of the Affected Persons 39. As early as 1998, the NIA Cebu-PIO commenced dialogues and community-based information campaign to ensure that the concerned households and PAF/Ps in both the reservoir and dam construction sites and service areas were aware of the implications of the proposed project. Topographic and plot maps were prepared based on surveys undertaken in 2000 and later updated in early 2001 and 2002. Socioeconomic surveys and asset inventory on the land and census of the people affected were likewise undertaken. The NIA undertook the initial valuation of assets and other improvements on the land (structures and crops), using the procedures and appraisal system of the local Municipal Assessor Office. 40. The socioeconomic survey results serve as benchmark for determining the impact of the Project on PAF/Ps and basis for formulating mitigating measures included as part of the LARP. In addition, the asset inventory determines the level of compensation and replacement for assets and properties, including personal and communal, which need to be included as part of the LARP. 41. A socioeconomic survey was undertaken in the proposed reservoir and dam sites last January-March 2001 and August 2002, respectively. The result showed that the average household size is 5.5 members. In a sample of 98 households, 88 have male household heads while 10 have female household heads. There are 99 children reported to be still going to school. A typical household has stayed and cultivated the land for 31 years on average. Only three households reported less than five years as the duration of their stay and cultivation of the area. Almost all have lived in the area for most of their lives.


18 May 2003

42. The average size of land claimed and/or tilled in the affected area is 3,977 m2. Typically, some 70 m2 are utilized for housing while the rest of the plot is used for agricultural activities. Most (92 percent) household respondents are aware that their agricultural and residential lands are in Timberland area. Eight respondents claimed that their agricultural lands are in A&D3 area but verification with DENR revealed it to be otherwise. 43. The average annual household income is P 66,834, of which around 11 percent is contributed by farm income. The bigger proportion (89 percent) of the total household income is from non-agriculture related activities. Working members of the household are employed either as laborer, painter, plumber, welder in construction works, house helper, driver, sales clerk, office worker, furniture maker, cook, seamstress, photographer, daycare teacher, local government official, or engaged in small buy-and-sell businesses. It should also be noted that farming is not the sole domain of male members of the household. 44. Women often play a crucial role in agricultural activities particularly in vegetable cultivation. 45. The incidence of poverty in the project area is around 60 percent, which is very much higher than the national poverty incidence of 34.2 percent (NSO, 2000).

4.3 Compensation, Relocation and Rehabilitation Requirements 46. Of the 148 directly affected PAFs in the reservoir area, 49 (24 in Can-Asujan and 25 in Calidngan) have houses and reside within the said affected area, of which 39 are cultivators whose residence are on the cultivated land itself while 10 are non-cultivators but have residential structures within; the rest (99 households) are cultivators but do not reside within the land they cultivate. Of the 49 resident households, only 41 (39 resident-cultivators and 2 residents only category) had expressed the intent to relocate to a relocation site since they are going to lose everything that they have (land, their house and other land improvement). This group will require the full resettlement and compensation package. The rest (8 households) have other farms or houses to transfer to outside of the affected area. They only opted for transfer assistance and compensation on lost assets. The other 99 PAFs composed of 57 non-resident cultivators (who have other cultivated plots outside the affected areas) and 42 land “claimants” will receive compensation for the affected properties found on the land. Thus, there are 41 PAFs who will be subject of full resettlement and relocation while 107 PAFs will receive transfer assistance, compensation, disturbance and other similar fees as well as livelihood assistance. 47. The communal facilities (access road cum spillway, water supplies and chapels) in the submerged area, which will be affected, will also be replaced to enable the affected households outside the submerged area to continue having access to such. For residents outside of the proposed reservoir area, but affected 3 A and D lands are Alienable and Disposable lands. These are titled or public lands, which have been declared suitable for disposal (distribution for titling) by the Government. At present, conversion of public lands to disposable lands is a function of Congress.


19 May 2003

by the loss of communal facilities and infrastructure due to their submergence, NIA will replace the lost facilities with equivalent or improved facilities. 48. In the dam site, 34 PAFs4 (23 cultivators and 11 non-resident land “claimants”) will lose the improvement (trees and crops) on the land, of which 9 PAFs will need to transfer residential and other structures outside of the affected area during the period of dam construction. All of the 34 PAFs opted to avail of compensation package with those who will need to transfer residence getting transfer assistance, on the understanding that after the dam construction they can go back to their land and farm them again. 49. The agreements on the resettlement and compensation of PAFs in the submerged and dam construction areas are shown in Table 3 below. Of the 182 PAFs (129 are resident-cultivators of the plots while 53 are absentee-claimants), 41 qualify for the full resettlement and compensation package while 141 (of which 17 will be provided transfer assistance to their own plots outside of the affected areas) are entitled to the other compensation measures. For communities who will lose access to facilities, which will be lost due to land submersion, replacement facilities of equivalent value and easier access will be provided. All PAFs will have equal opportunity of accessing the rehabilitation measures, i.e., training and livelihood development fund. Table 3. Agreements on Resettlement and Compensation, Submerged and

Dam Construction Areas

Location of APs Expressed

Full Resettlement,

Relocation and

Compensation

House Transfer

Assistance and

Compensation

Compensation Only for Land Improvement

Compensation

for land improvement and land right

Total

Number Of

Household

Submerged Area

41

8

57

42.

1 48

Dam Construction

Site

-

9

7

8

24

Submerged and Dam Site

-

-

7

3

10

Subtotal 41 17 71 .53 182 Source: Census of PAFs, NIA: March 2001- August 2002. 50. The ROW acquisition in the service area as shown in Table 4 indicates the following: of the 6.2338 ha required for ROW, 1.5606 ha had been contributed as equity by beneficiary farmers, 2.0631 ha donated by non-beneficiary landowners, 1.6544 ha permitted easement in private lands, and 0.5751 ha permitted easement in public lands, while 0.3806 ha will be subject of expropriation.

4 Eight of the PAFs in the dam construction area have also arable lands in the submerged area: of the 8, 2 have availed of the full resettlement package and are included in the 41 resettlers in the submerged area.


20 May 2003

Table 4. Summary of ROW Acquisition in the Service Area Resettlement and Compensation Measures

Equity Donation Easement Compensation (Expropriation)

Category of PAFs

Number of PAFs or affected areas

Size of

Landholding (ha)

Size of ROW

Acquisition (ha) # of

PAFs Total Size

# of PAFs

Total Size

# of PAFs

Total Size

# of PAFs

Total Size

R 24 37.7311 0.5333 21 0.4577 - - 3 0.0756 - - Beneficiary Farmers

V 134 127.1887 1.1503 127 1.1029 - - 7 0.0474 - - Subtotal 158 164.9198 1.6836 148 1.5606 - - 10 0.1230 - -

R 120 167.1227 2.1562 - - 67 1.2415 43 0.7503 10 0.1644 Non-Bene Farmers V 186 208.9049 1.8189 - - 84 0.8216 80 0.7811 22 0.2162 Subtotal 306 376.0276 3.9751 - - 151 2.0631 123 1.5314 32 0.3806

R 6 areas - 0.2563 - - - - - 0.2563 - - Public Easement V 7 areas - 0.3188 - - - - - 0.3188 - -

R 144 204.8538 2.9458 21 0.4577 67 1.2415 46 1.0822 10 0.1644 Total V 320 336.0936 3.2880 127 1.1029 84 0.8216 87 1.1473 22 0.2162 G. TOTAL 464 540.9474 6.2338 148 1.5606 151 2.0631 133 2.2295 32 0.3806

Source: Cebu-PIO, 2003 51. Table 5 below summarizes the number of PAFs in the affected areas (submerged, dam and service areas) and the type of resettlement and rehabilitation options applicable. Table 5. Number of Affected Families/Persons and Resettlement Options

Provided Resettlement Options

Affected Areas

AP

Category

No of PAF

Relocation

Compensation Rehabilitation

House Transfer.

Compense, Rehab

Compen

se, Rehab

Contributed

As Equity

Donated

Permitted Easement

For

Exprop

Submerged Area

Non-bene

148

41

8

99

-

-

-

Dam Area Non-bene 34 - 9 25 - - - Beneficiary 158 - - - 148 - 10 - Non-Bene 306 - - - - 151 123 32 Public land - - - - - 13 areas -

Service Area Sub-total 464 - - - 148 151 133 32 TOTAL 646 41 17 124 148 151 133 32

Source: Cebu-PIO, 2003


21 May 2003

5.0 RELOCATION AND COMPENSATION ENTITLEMENTS 5.1 Resettlement and Compensation Entitlements 52. The LARP for Can-asujan SRIP incorporates the entitlement package outlined in the RPPF and shown in Table 6 below. 53. NIA-SPISP through its field office in Cebu-PIO established a Property Assessment and Valuation Committee with the participation of representatives of the Engineering and Institutional Development Divisions of the Cebu-PIO, Provincial and Municipal Assessor Office, Provincial Appraisal Committee, Office of the Mayor of Carcar, and the PAF/Ps from the affected barangays and service barangays of the Can-asujan SRIP. The Property Assessment and Valuation Committee determined the replacement value of the land, structures, crops and trees and other improvements therein in accordance with the fair market value and the associated transaction costs. 54. As a general rule, PAF/Ps losing agricultural land are to be compensated through “land for value” arrangements either with an equivalent piece of land of equal productive capacity and acceptable to them, or compensation in cash at fair market value plus transaction costs. In addition, those who lose (acquired as ROW) agricultural land will be compensated for the loss of standing crops, fruit trees or other trees at full market value as provided for in the Entitlement Matrix. Other forms of assistance shall also be extended by SPISP-NIA to ensure adequate mitigating measures to address adverse impact. The package will include disturbance compensation, demolition, relocation and transfer assistance, and livelihood assistance as the case maybe. 55. Only those who were included in the Plot Location Map5 and census within a given cut-off date are eligible for the resettlement and compensation package. The eligibility criteria is made part and parcel of this framework. 56. The matrix below will be used in the settlement of claims for compensation for lost assets of PAF/Ps based on the aforementioned principles and legal framework. Unless otherwise indicated, payment of compensation and other entitlements and the extension of assistance will be given to PAP households and not to the individuals.

5 The individual plots in the proposed submerged area and dam site, were mapped out by the staff of Cebu-PIO with the assistance of the cultivator/resident of the plot in order to have a basis to assess the scope of impact and determine the level of compensation on improvement of the land.


22 May 2003

Table 6. General SPISP Resettlement Entitlement Matrix as per the RPPF Type of Loss Application Definition of

entitled person Compensation Policy

Implementation Issues

Loss of arable land

A. Arable land subject of ROW acquisition for the reservoir, dam, irrigation canals and similar infrastructures of the subprojects.

A1. Persons (owners and tenants) who cultivate the affected parcel of land and landowners who do not cultivate the land

A1. Compensation is based on either land for land or land for value. If the former is opted, replacement land will be provided; if the latter is chosen, compensation will be based on its fair market value of land. A2. Land provided as equity or donated for ROW is also valuated based on its fair market value. A3. A one-time disturbance fee will be paid to APs of concerned parcels of land affected by ROW acquisition.

A1 - Replacement land acceptable and close to place of origin and provided the minimum social infrastructure. - Compensation will only be for A&D and titled land. Proof of land ownership is required. Claimants of non-A&D public land are not entitled to land compensation; but compensation for structures, crops and trees on affected land will be provided. -

Loss of residential land

Residential land located in ROW

a. Legal occupants of the land with certification from the relevant authorities b. Illegal occupants of the land

a. For farmers with residence in the cultivated area, the replacement land is inclusive of residential land. Farm establishment assistance will be provided only to cultivators of the affected lands. b. For household residents (but not cultivators) of the land (whether legal or illegal occupants of the land), a replacement home lot will be provided.

a. The productive value (income potential) of the replacement land will be equivalent to but not less than the productive value of the current property.


23 May 2003

Type of Loss Application Definition of entitled person

Compensation Policy


Loss of structures

a. Residential structures b. Other structures like fence, pigpen, chicken house, storage/drying facility, etc.) c. Communal structures like chapel, playground, basketball court, etc.

a. Legal owners of the houses b. Legal owners of the structures c. Community which owns the structure

a. Compensation in cash or in kind (e.g. housing materials) will be paid on the basis of the replacement value of the structures. Disturbance compensation will be paid only to those who are residents and whose houses are in the ROW area. b. Compensation on the basis of the replacement value of the structures c. Equivalent replacement.

a. Assessment and valuation of the structure should have the participation of the PAF/Ps b-Ditto- c. Cash compensation should be avoided

Loss of communal resources

a. Natural spring which is the source of domestic water for the households b. Cultural sites

a. Households or community, which sourced their water from there. b. PAPs in ROW areas

a. Replacement in kind, if available, or compensation for loss and replacement with alternate water supply b. Negotiated disturbance compensation

a. Replacement should take into consideration the access to the replacement resource by the PAFs

Loss of standing crops/trees

a. Crops, trees, etc. located in the ROW area

a. Persons who either own the land and/or planted the crops in the said land

a. Compensation in cash based on replacement value of the crops, trees, etc.

a. If a tenant rather than the landowner himself cultivated the land, an agreed formula for sharing the compensation between the owner and the tenant should be arrived at.


24 May 2003

Type of Loss Application Definition of entitled person

Compensation Policy


Displacement from rented and occupied residential structures

Households renting or leasing housing structures as place of residence

Legitimate occupants of the residential unit as certified by proper authority

Disturbance compensation shall be paid to these renters

If these renters are also tenant cultivator, then they are entitled to land replacement and they will be assisted in establishing their residence in the land they will be cultivating. If they are merely resident renters, they will be assisted in finding a residential unit they can rent in the same community.

57. As a result of the census, socio-economic survey and series of consultation, five categories of resettlement, compensation and entitlements packages were formulated and agreed upon with the PAF/Ps and incorporated in the LARP. 5.1.1 Full Resettlement, Compensation and Rehabilitation 58. There are 41 PAFs (see Annex C for the complete list and the compensation measures for this group) who stand to lose the entire land they are cultivating as well as the improvements therein (houses and other structures, trees and crops) and have no other plots outside the affected area to transfer and relocate to; they opted for full resettlement and compensation. They are entitled to a replacement agricultural plot with equivalent production capacity. A titled land located in Bgy. Guadalupe of the Municipality of Carcar, will be provided by NIA with access road, electricity, domestic water supply and irrigation facility; this shall serve as its replacement (see Annex D for the Site Development Plan). Seventy five percent of the cost of land replacement will be subsidized by NIA but the concerned PAFs will have to provide 25 percent equity for the cost of purchase. The said equity contribution maybe amortized by the individual PAFs over a period of 15-25 years depending on their individual paying capacity. The amortization payment will start three years after the completion of the relocation activities. A draft MOA between the NIA and concerned PAFs on this arrangement is shown in Annex E. Moreover, only 60 percent of the size of the ROW acquired land shall be replaced given the result of the economic study of the Agricultural Economist (Consultant). The study showed that the potential production and income from the replacement land will be more than adequate to compensate for the lost agricultural income, and cover the amortization payment on the 25 percent counterpart for the purchase of the replacement land and with some savings to boot. The 60 percent replacement is also considered an ideal ratio that will still enable the APs to cover the amortization payment within the period of 15-25 years. A copy of the Report of the Agricultural Economist is part of the Annex of the RPPF.


25 May 2003

59. The PAFs will also receive free of charge a core house6 valued at not less than PHP50,000 per unit as well as assistance in the transfer of the old housing materials to the resettlement site, a disturbance compensation equivalent to PHP10,000 per household and an income restoration fee of P200 per day for at least 4 days per household during the period of relocation and transfer. They will also be compensated for the assessed value of the affected structures and the improvement on the land. Livelihood training and credit facility for the livelihood project will also be made available to them to ensure that their living standard is equal to or higher than the previous condition. Annex C has presented the detailed computation of the benefit package for the individual re-settlers. 5.1.2 Relocation through Transfer Assistance and Compensation 60. There are 17 PAFs in the submerged area whose houses maybe affected, who chose not to avail of the replacement land because they have other lands outside the affected area they can transfer their house to. Instead, they opted to relocate their houses to their other plots outside of the affected areas. They will be entitled to a core house and relocation and transfer assistance, compensation for the lost and damages to the land improvement (houses and other structures, trees and crops), disturbance compensation and income restoration as well as access to livelihood development training and credit assistance. On the other hand, the 12 transferees in the dam site will move back and use again the land for residential and cultivation purposes after the dam construction. Except for the core house, they will be entitled to all the compensation and benefits provided the 8 transferees. Annex F shows the specific compensation package for this group. 5.1.3 Compensation 61. The other 99 PAFs in the submerged area and 34 PAFs in the dam construction site who are non-resident farmers in the affected area are entitled to compensation for lost assets and improvements. They will be given disturbance compensation, compensation for land improvement (structures, trees and crops) as well as livelihood development assistance. Inventory and valuation of affected improvement and other assets had been undertaken previously with the assistance and participation of concerned PAFs. Of the 133 PAFs, which qualify for the compensation only, 53 are absentee land claimants (42 and 8 in the submerged and dam area, respectively and 3 in both the submerged and dam areas). Annexes G1 and G2 show the compensation details for the compensation only group. Compensation for the land improvement and disturbance will be shared between the resident cultivator and non-resident land “claimant” based on a formula agreed upon between the two parties as shown in a sample memorandum of agreement (MOA) in Annex H. Based on the result of the negotiation, the sharing scheme ranges from a ratio of 30:70 to 50:50 for the claimant and cultivator, respectively. If the absentee land claimant and his resident cultivator has not arrived at an agreement after the given cut-off date, the subproject will file with the appropriate Regional Trial Court a request for expropriation of concerned properties and deposit in an escrow account the equivalent amount intended for the compensation on the affected structures, 6 The core house is a block masonry house without interior finished partitions to provide option to the owners to develop it their way. In general, this is better quality structure than most residents now occupy.


26 May 2003

crops and trees in specified parcels of land. Upon approval by the court of the said proceeding, the subproject will take over the concerned areas (reservoir and dam sites). Annex I shows the list of plots where claimants and their corresponding cultivators have not arrived at sharing agreement, which will be subject of expropriation proceeding. To ensure that the concerned cultivators are not unduly affected by the delay of payment in the compensation on improvement, release of payment for those items that can already be done will be facilitated by the subproject. 62. The row required land for irrigation facilities (6.2337 ha) in the service areas is only about one percent of the total affected land of 541 ha. The equity contribution was valued at the fair market price ranging from P 150-350 per m2. No PAF has provided as equity land with value exceeding his required individual equity contribution. Those that may have to be acquired by the project from non-beneficiaries who want cash compensation will be paid the equivalent fair market value of the land plus transaction costs. This however will only apply to those A&D and privately owned lands. APs whose land is subject of expropriation will be paid the equivalent amount deposited in escrow account in their favor as soon as the Regional Trial Court has decided on the case. Annex J shows the list of APs in the service area (rice and vegetables) whose lands are subject of expropriation. 5.1.4 Replacement of Lost Communal Facilities and Structures 63. There is an existing road cum spillway in the Calidngan area, which will be submerged. The community members wanting to commute to Can-asujan do not have alternative access. NIA will construct an all weather road and a 40 m one-lane bridge spanning a narrow section of the reservoir and connecting to the existing road leading to the barangay center. Likewise, the two chapels and three water supplies, which will be affected, will be replaced. 64. The entitlements for resettlement are laid out in the Entitlement Matrix in Table 7, following the guidelines in the RPPF. The NIA staff initially conducted a comprehensive asset inventory and assessed the value of the properties based on current value of the materials used in the construction of structures and crops being cultivated in the affected area. Later on, in accordance with the Philippine law, the Provincial Appraisal Committee (PAC) assisted the NIA-Cebu PIO in the final valuation of the affected assets before compensations are finally paid.


27 May 2003

Table 7. Entitlement Matrix of the Can-asujan SRIP LARP Type of Loss

Application Definition of Entitled Person

Compensation Policy Implementation Issues

Loss of Arable Land

a. Approximately 33 ha of arable land in upstream area in Bgys. Can-asujan and Calidngan to be made into a reservoir for the Can-asujan SRIP. b. Approximately 6.2338 ha of land in the service area (the rice and vegetable areas required for ROW.)

A1. 131 residents and cultivators who totally or partially lose the right to cultivate the land a2. 53 absentee claimants who show proof of access right to the land. B1 Beneficiary landowners providing affected land as equity against their fees b.2. Non-beneficiary landowners

a1. Land will not be compensated but as rehabilitation measure those who qualify for relocation (41) will receive irrigated replacement land in the service areaand disturbance fee as well as compensation on the market value of damaged structures and crops (142). If the resident cultivator is tied with a sharecropping a2. No land compensation butf compensation for their share of land improvement (trees and crops) and disturbance fee. B1 affected Land is valuate at marketrates and its value is discounted from the Afs fees. b.2 Payment of cash compensation on the basis of the fair market value of the land for non-donors.

a. Equity contribution by PAFs (resettlers) of 25 percent of purchase cost on land replacement, which maybe amortized on a monthly basis over a period of 15- 25 years based on capacity to pay. The rest of the value of replacement land will be subsidized by NIA. B1. In no case the value of the land lost by one AF fully offset the AF fees. Therefore no pecuniary compensation will be disbursed..

Loss of Residential land

a. Residential land that will be lost as a result of submersion and dam construction

a. Legal and illegal occupants of the land

a. Farmers with houses in the cultivated land, replacement land is inclusive of residential plot. - For resident but not cultivator, replacement house lot will be provided. - Relocation and transfer assistance provided. - Disturbance compensation provided.

a. Equity contribution by PAFs (resettlers) of 25 percent of purchase cost at market value on land replacement, which maybe amortized on a monthly basis over a period of 15- 25 years based on capacity to pay. The remaining 75% of the value of replacement plots will be subsidized by NIA

Loss of Structures

a. Residential Structures b. Other structures such as fence, storage/drying facility,

a. Legal owners of the houses b. Legal owners of other structures

a. Compensation in kind provided on basis of the replacement value of lost structures. For 41 re-settlers, a core house valued at P50,000 will be given b. Compensation is based on the replacement value of the

a. Assessment and valuation of the structure with the participation of the PAF/Ps concerned. b. Assessment and valuation of the structure with the participation of


28 May 2003

Type of Loss

Application Definition of Entitled Person

Compensation Policy Implementation Issues

animal pens, etc. c. Communal structures like chapel and access road.

c. Community which own the structures

lost structures. c. Replacement structures of equivalent if not greater value will be provided.

the PAF/Ps concerned. c. Easy access of affected community to the replacement facility will be ensured.

Loss of communal resources and facilities

a. Source of domestic water b. Access road

a. Households, which source their water from there. b. Community members which utilize said facility

a. Replacement with alternate water supply. b. Replacement with similar facility

a. Replacement will ensure the easy access by the PAPs. b. Replacement will ensure the easy access by the PAPs.

Loss of Standing Crops

a. Crops, trees located in the ROW area

a. Person who either own the land or planted the crops/trees

a. Compensation in cash based on the assessed value of the inventories crops, trees, etc.

a. If a tenant is the cultivator of the trees and crops rather than the landowner or claimant himself, an agreement on the sharing of the compensation should be arrived at.

Loss of non farm income during relocation period

a. Employment income

a. Employed PAFs who will experience loss of income during period of relocation and transfer

a. Income restoration fee at P200/day for 4 days will be provided to cover the period of dislocation and transfer of residence.

a. Only those PAFs with employed family heads during the relocation period will be provided the reimbursement on income loss.

Loss of agricultural income opportunity

a. Rehabilitation Measures

a. All cultivators who will experience loss of income from agriculture

a. All PAFs will be trained for specific livelihood undertakings and funds and technical support will be provided

a. NGO may be contracted to manage this component

Note: Please note signed sample agreements for compensation related to type of

loss are presented in Annex N. All agreements regardless of type of loss are available in Can-asujan Subproject Office, Carcar, Cebu.


29 May 2003

6.0 REHABILITATION

6.1 Livelihood Development and Income Restoration 65. Per RPPF, for PAF/Ps who have lost their entire productive base (meaning agricultural land, businesses, jobs, other sources of income) or a portion thereof, regardless of whether they have lost their houses, rehabilitation will be required. Their incomes must be restored by means of access to new opportunities, which are facilitated by SPISP. These new opportunities may take the form of compensation, replacement of lost lands, training to increase or provide new skills, and other support mechanisms, such as loans or seed money for improved agricultural production, fisheries, and livestock. 66. For the PAF/Ps of the Can-asujan SRIP, the LARP incorporates a rehabilitation plan that will enhance and improve the income level of concerned PAF. To rehabilitate the PAF/Ps, the Can-asujan LARP will undertake the following strategies:

• For PAF/Ps near or within the construction site of the dam and the reservoir, preferential consideration for employment as construction staff in the infrastructure works will be arranged with the Cebu-PIO contractors; this will provide temporary employment to PAPs as they begin the process of resettlement;

• Micro-financing for development of small enterprises – women will be the focus of this strategy;

• Fisheries – PAF/Ps near the proposed reservoir; • Vegetable and fruit production – Cebu PIO will provide technical assistance

and funds for demonstrations; and • Livelihood training – skills to increase the income potential for PAPs.

67. For rehabilitation in the case of lost lands: during negotiation, PAF/Ps will have the choice of compensation or replacement for lost land. The replacement land will ensure that long-term income base is provided the concerned PAF/Ps. Cash compensation for loss of land will be discouraged, but maybe available on a case-to-case basis. 68. Land replacement procedure in the case of the PAF/Ps in the proposed submerged area will be on the basis of land-for-value arrangement. That is, replacement land will not be on one-on-one basis. Based on the comparative study of productivity of replacement land and that of the lost land, NIA will replace 65 percent of the total size of the lost land considering that the production capacity of the replacement land compared to the lost land is more than 3 times. The higher production capacity of the replacement land is made possible through the provision of irrigation facility and technical assistance extended by NIA-SPISP. 69. Since the lost land (reservoir and dam sites) is classified as public land, the PAF/Ps will have to contribute as equity the equivalent of 25 percent on the cost of acquisition of the replacement land. The equity contribution maybe amortized by concerned PAFs over a period of 15-25 years depending on their capacity to


30 May 2003

pay. The title to the land will be issued in favor of both the husband and wife or in the case of single headed household, in favor of the head. The title will be available to the re-settlers upon the completion of the amortization payment; and, if the PAF so wishes, amortization can be completed within a shorter period of time after which the land documents shall immediately be turned over to the concerned PAF. 70. Agreements shall be arrived at through a process of negotiations whereby the PAF/Ps with the LGU representatives and Cebu-PIO try to arrive at consensus. Results of the negotiations are subject to the grievance redress procedures as discussed in Section 8. 71. During the period of relocation when the concerned PAF/Ps will be dismantling and transferring residence, the head of the household who is normally working for their livelihood will have to be absent from work. An income restoration allowance computed at P200 per day per household for at most four days will be provided. This is to ensure that no disruption in income occur during the relocation period.


31 May 2003

7.0 ORGANIZATIONAL FRAMEWORK 7.1 Institutional Arrangement 72. The responsibility for planning and implementing all activities under the LARP as shown in Figure 4, are as follows:

a) NIA has overall responsibility for planning and implementing all activities under the Program Framework under the guidance of the Project Consultants. NIA-CPMO will coordinate and report on the progress in the sub-projects, and will handle resettlement issue requiring actions and attention at central and field levels. NIA-CPMO has overall control and management of the project resettlement budget.

b) Funds for the resettlement program will be provided by NIA from

budgetary allocation for the Project; NIA Regional Offices will monitor the implementation of land acquisition and resettlement activities. Responsibilities of NIA System Offices include planning, coordination of field implementation, financial control, information exchange and inter-agency liaison, internal inspection and day-to-day monitoring.

The Cebu-PIO IDD, with the assistance of the PAF/Ps, will carry out resettlement activities under the supervision of the Provincial Irrigation Engineer. The PIO will be in charge of undertaking the various tasks laid out in the LARP including identification, census and asset inventory, and socio-economic surveys, dissemination of sub-project information to PAF/Ps, establishment of transparent mechanisms for land valuation/asset assessment, grievance redress, and administration of all compensation-related matters, and the identification, acquisition and development of the proposed relocation site.

c) The Office of the Mayor of Carcar will coordinate the activities of the

various government and non-government agencies along the implementation of the resettlement and compensation program. It ensures that the interest of its constituency is protected.

d) Grievance Redress Committee

The Grievance Redress Committee composed of representatives from various line agencies and PAFs will be responsible for dealing with grievance of PAPs concerning compensation and resettlement issues. The process will involve the case or complaint being referred first to the duly designated community organization, which will review its merit and/or provide immediate response. If the case cannot be acted upon or resolved at this level, and if found meritorious it will be referred to the Grievance Redress Committee for appropriate action.


32 May 2003

e) Provincial Appraisal Committee

The Provincial Appraisal Committee is the duly designated government body at the provincial level tasked with assessing and valuating assets and properties for acquisition and/or disposal by the government. NIA will ask the assistance of the PAC for the appraisal of the PAF/Ps’ assets that need to be compensated by the Project. Likewise, the resettlement land, which needs to be acquired for the PAF/Ps has to be appraised by PAC before the purchase can be effected.

f) Municipal Agriculture Office

The Municipal Agriculture Office will assist concerned PAF/Ps through the provision of technical inputs and coordination to ensure the success of the livelihood (aquaculture and vegetable cultivation) program implementation. An assigned Agricultural Technician shall guide the PAF/Ps in this endeavor.

g) Municipal Social Welfare and Development Office

The Municipal Social Welfare and Development Office will assist in the formulation and implementation of a livelihood program to address the possible income displacement that the PAF/Ps may experience and restore them to a level previously enjoyed. They will undertake training and capability building activities. The livelihood development fund for aquaculture and other livelihood projects/activities of the Project shall be supplemented with funds from the Office of the Mayor to finance other income generating projects of the PAF/Ps.

h) Municipal Health Office

The Municipal Health Office will be responsible for ensuring that medical attention is provided the PAF/Ps and staff who will be assisting the PAF/Ps during the relocation activities. The MHO will also be conducting periodic medical missions in the resettlement site while the barangay health station in the host barangay is still being strengthened to ensure that it is able to provide health care for additional clients.

i) Community Environment and Natural Resources Officer

The Department of Environment and Natural Resources through its Community Environment and Natural Resources Officer (CENRO) will assist the Project in facilitating the titling of plots to be awarded to the re-settlers. It will also help the Project staff in clarifying issues concerning the status of tenurial rights in timberland and public lands as well as assist in the verification of the status of the resettlement land to be purchased by the Project.


33 May 2003

j) Municipal and Barangay Officials

Officials of the affected barangays play an important role in facilitating and coordinating the various activities of the project and ensuring that the interest of their constituents is protected. It will serve as the formal channel for relaying to the various stakeholders especially the PAF/Ps the appropriate information on the intentions and actions of the NIA. In this way, speculations and misinformation about the project are minimized and/or corrected.

k) Local Philippine National Police

Representatives of the local Philippine National Police will provide assistance in the course of relocation and resettlement to ensure peace and order and to protect life and property. They will also be asked to maintain a presence in the resettlement site to complement the peace brigade (Barangay Tanod) of the host barangay while the resettlement activities are being stabilized.

l) Task Forces and Action Groups

At community level, various task forces and action groups will also be organized and mobilized. The Committee on Public Information and Documentation will be responsible for providing and feeding back information on procedures for relocation, benefits and compensation, coordinate community meetings and document process of resettlement activities. The Committee on Demolition, Relocation and Transfer will coordinate and assist the NIA on dismantling and transfer activities. It will identify and organize the labor force among family members for the dismantling of houses and other structures, ensure that the families are properly organized for their scheduled transfer to the designated relocation site, and that the corresponding households are provided the necessary support and logistics. In the course of the implementation of the LARP, other organizations will be established to complement efforts and activities of existing ones as well as to ensure that the re-settlers participate in the effort and are mobilized as a community. Some of these organizations are: Homeowners’ Association The re-settlers will be organized into an association of homeowners. It will be governed by by-laws, rules and regulations and headed by officers elected annually, which will oversee the community affairs. The Association shall spearhead the formulation and implementation of the Community Development Plan with the participation of the community members. It shall assist the NIA in the collection of monthly amortization of fees to ensure that its members are updated on dues and that title to their lots is eventually transferred.


34 May 2003

Livelihood Development Groups In response to the need to provide livelihood opportunities and augment income, the women re-settlers will also be organized and provided skills in planning and undertaking income-generating activities. This will be particularly true for vegetable cultivation in the resettlement site. Likewise the other PAF/Ps who chose to remain within the area adjacent to the reservoir will also be assisted in engaging in aquaculture project. Seed money and technical assistance will be provided by NIA, which will also call on other relevant line agencies to provide technical support. A qualified NGO will be contracted to be responsible for the organization and capacity building of the concerned PAPs.

7.2 Role of NGO in LARP Implementation 73. NIA may engage an NGO to assist in the organization, training and coordination of the livelihood development program. It will provide management and administrative support to the PAF/Ps in the implementation of their respective livelihood projects. The NGO that will be contracted must have the necessary expertise in aquaculture and vegetable production activities. It shall maintain a presence in the resettlement site as well as the reservoir to ensure immediate response to the needs of the PAF/Ps. The NGO will be provided technical backup and support by NIA staff and Consultant as well as the local cooperating agencies and the LGU.


35 May 2003

Figure 4. Organizational Framework for the Can-asujan LARP Implementation

Project Steering Committee

Consultants

Can-asujan SRIP

MA/AT

MSWDO

CENRO

PNP

Barangay Officials RTC

MHO

Community Association

Livelihood Association

Community Action Group

Grievance Redress Community

Assessment & Valuation

Demo/Reloc./Transfer

Peace & Order Com

Public Info & Doc.

Environmental

SPISP - CPMO

Affected Communities/IAs/PAFs

Cebu-PIO

Municipality of Carcar

Cooperating Agencies

NGO


36 May 2003

8.0 COMPLAINTS AND GRIEVANCE REDRESS MECHANISM 8.1 Complaints and Grievance Procedures 74. The PAFs will participate throughout the various stages of resettlement activities and in the resettlement land acquisition process. They will be consulted by the concerned authorities and will be invited to participate in public meetings held by the Cebu-PIO and/or the Mayor of Carcar. These meetings provide the occasion for the PAFs to express their opinions and offer their suggestions. 75. The PAFs are publicly informed of the details of resettlement activities for the Can-Asujan SRIP. The information made public and provided to each household will include cut-off dates and or schedules for each activities, individual entitlements, eligibility criteria, modes of compensation, complaints and grievance redress procedures. 76. After the implementation of the relocation and compensation package, it is expected that there are concerns and issues as well as problems and grievances that may have to be brought to the attention of concerned authorities and agencies. 77. To ensure that these are properly addressed and given due attention, a mechanism shall be put in place to receive complaints. A Homeowners’ Association will be established immediately after the 41 re-settlers are settled in the relocation site in Bgy. Guadalupe. It will have a set of officers to take charge of the affairs of the new community. In addition to its various functions, it will also serve as the channel for hearing complaints and problems concerning the implementation of the LARP of which meritorious cases shall be endorsed to NIA and/or local government as the case maybe and shall also be responsible for collecting and receiving the monthly amortization dues of the individual re-settlers to be remitted to NIA. 78. For cases involving PAFs outside of the resettlement site, a list of contact persons who are members of the Grievance Redress Committee shall be provided. PAFs with complaints or grievances, which they want brought to the attention of the concerned authorities, shall air their complaint to these contact persons who shall also be responsible for ensuring that these complaints or problems are properly channeled to the appropriate authority who are charged with addressing them. 8.2 Redress Procedures 79. The Grievance Redress Committee is a body tasked to respond to problems and issues arising from the implementation of the LARP of the Can-Asujan SRIP. It is responsible for ensuring compliance with the requirements for compensation and resettlement including opportunities provided the re-settlers on livelihood assistance and financing. It is established to monitor and conduct hearing on the complaints and grievances of the affected persons regarding their dislocation and losses pertinent to the acquisition of land, houses and other assets including livelihood disturbance by the Project.


37 May 2003

80. The Committee shall be composed of one (1) member each from the following local government agencies and PAF/Ps organizations, namely:

- Head of the Institutional Development Division, Cebu Provincial Irrigation Office, National Irrigation Administration (NIA),

- Cebu CENRO, Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR)

- Head of the Beneficiaries Development Coordination Division, Cebu-Department of Agrarian Reform (DAR)

- Municipal Agriculturist - Assessor, Carcar-Municipal Assessor’s Office - Treasurer, Carcar-Municipal Treasurer Office - Mayor, Office of the Mayor - Head of Irrigators’ Association (IA) representing People’s Organization

(PO); - Representative of the land cultivators; and - Representative of the homeowners group

81. Hearings on cases of complaints shall be held and merits determined. The appropriate recommendation shall be forwarded to NIA-CEBU PIO for appropriate actions. Monitoring on the course of action shall also be undertaken and feedback to the concerned complainant.


38 May 2003

9.0 PUBLIC PARTICIPATION – DISCLOSURE, CONSULTATION AND PARTICIPATION

9.1 Disclosure 82. As part of the RPPF requirement and condition, “PAF/Ps should be fully informed and closely consulted in resettlement and compensation options”. 83. The details of the Can-asujan LARP will be contained in an information booklet (see Annex K for the outline) translated in the Cebuano dialect and distributed to all affected families in concerned barangays, Irrigation Association Offices and concerned offices of the Municipal Government of Carcar for public disclosure. 84. Copies of the Can-asujan LARP in English will be available at the ADB Headquarters in Manila and will be published in the ADB website for appropriate disclosure.

9.2 Consultation and Participation 85. To cushion, if not, avoid the worries and apprehensions created by the thought of being resettled, consultation activities with PAF/Ps are needed. Promoting the consultation process can be done through frequent information sharing with the stakeholders through meetings, house-to-house visits or other information-education-campaign tools. 86. For the Can-asujan SRIP, public information, consultation and participation in the LARP formulation and implementation started at the feasibility study stage of the subproject. Instrumental to its accomplishment is the Institutional Development Officer (IDO) assigned to the subproject. This is undertaken in the context of the Participatory Irrigation Management and Transfer Process (PIM&T). 87. NIA, primarily through the PIO and its IDOs, regularly provides information about the Project and the resettlement process to the PAF/Ps and the LGU officials prior to and during the LARP preparation. Sub-project design and formulation was started in 1998 and the Environmental Impact Assessment was initiated in July 1999. During the EIA exercise the municipal and barangay officials, the beneficiary farmers as well as the community members of the areas that will be submerged were informed of the project objectives and its likely positive and negative impacts. In the finalization of the feasibility study of the Can-asujan SRIP, a group of IDOs from the Cebu PIO with the assistance of the Consultant was tasked to look at the resettlement issues and concerns. Along this, several activities were undertaken that necessitated the participation of the affected households and the concerned barangays. The socio-economic survey, detailed asset inventory and plot mapping to determine exact size of the different plots required PAF participation, consultation and dialogues. Furthermore, to assure the PAF/Ps, several group meetings and dialogues were conducted together with the local officials and cooperating government agencies on the


39 May 2003

issues of relocation and compensation. Annex L provides the details of these consultations including the names of the participants. 88. In the preparation of the Environmental Clearance Certificate (ECC), the PAF/Ps participated in the public hearings and one of the measures included in the conditionality of the ECC was the formation of a monitoring group to ensure compliance and representatives of the PAFs are members of the this group. Likewise, several meetings and dialogues were conducted to discuss the terms and conditions of the resettlement and relocation. It is on this basis, that the options desired (resettlement, relocation and compensation) by the concerned PAF/Ps were determined. Furthermore, the concerned PAF/Ps were very much involved in the selection of the resettlement site. Several site visits were conducted and dialogues on the pros and cons of the proposed sites conducted; thus, the final site was chosen. As to the manner of compensating the absentee-claimants, several meetings were conducted where it was made clear as to the status of land being claimed. During these meetings, the DENR representatives were invited to ensure that issues pertinent to land status and compensation were clearly explained. 89. Accordingly, it is recognized that the success of LARP implementation is highly dependent on the involvement and participation of the PAF/Ps themselves, other stakeholders, barangay and municipal government officials and cooperating agencies. Thus, they need to be part of the decision making process and be responsible in ensuring the conduct of various critical activities specially related to the relocation and compensation and livelihood development. Accordingly, in the course of LARP implementation, all of these stakeholders will be continually consulted and asked to participate. 90. Involvement and participation of the PAPs in the formulation and implementation of the resettlement and compensation package, is being promoted. The PAPs are organized into Irrigators Associations (IAs) and Community Associations and their duly designated representatives are included in the Assessment and Valuation Committee, Complaint Monitoring Committee as well as in planning for the development of the resettlement site. Community action groups (CAG) shall also be organized, which will form the focal point for the various activities in the course of the implementation of the LARP. They shall be composed of men and women who are PAPs and bona fide members of the Community Association. The CAGs that shall be organized will include among others, Committees on Public Information and Documentation, Committee on Demolition, Relocation and Transfer, Committee on Safety, Peace and Order and Committee on Environmental Protection. These CAGs will work in close coordination with the staff of the Project. After the PAF/Ps are organized into a cohesive group, training on capacity building will be provided. 9.3 Gender Equity and Women Participation 91. Women constitute almost 60 percent of the total PAPs, but only about 8 percent of the households are female-headed. As the primary source of income of the household does not come from agriculture, many male household heads work as contractual laborers in the nearby town and Cebu City and they come home


40 May 2003

only once a week (during Sundays and holidays). Thus, the wife and most women are left to manage the farm and the household. The LARP therefore shall take this into consideration in its implementation. 92. When compensation payments are effected, this will be done with both the husband and wife present and acknowledging its receipt. For those PAFs who would be provided land replacement, title to the land will be in the names of both the husband and wife to ensure equity. 93. Likewise, considering the present situation where the male is generally absent during weekdays, livelihood assistance will focus primarily on women’s groups. Organization, capability building and livelihood fund assistance strategies will provide opportunities to both the men and women but the women will be given the priority. Women will also be highly involved in project monitoring with membership in the said committee to be equitable between genders.


41 May 2003

10.0 LARP COST AND BUDGET 10.1 Budget Requirement 94. The Can-Asujan LARP will require the following budget for the acquisition and development of the resettlement site as well as the compensation and rehabilitation-related activities as detailed in Table 8:

Table 8. Proposed Budget for the LARP

Fund Source Items Cost ADB GOP

Comments

1. Acquisition of Resettlement Land

P 12,000,000.00 (P11,100,840.00- land acquisition and the balance for ancillary cost)

X

To include 18.5014 ha @ P60 per m2. Plus documentation, subdivision, titling

2. Resettlement Site Development

P 5,126,960.00

X

Including access roads, electricity and water connections

3. Land Acquisition Cost

P 4,285,510.00 – ROW at the service area

X

This will cover the approximately 1.7 ha of ROW land valued at around P250/m2 for the non-beneficiary landowners in the service area.

4. Public Information – Consultation Activities

P 200,000.00

X

To include expenses for community preparation, information campaign, meetings and dialogues, etc.

5. Compensation for: Damages to Crops/Trees

P 4,100,000.00

X

Details of crop appraisal are shown in Annex C,D,E &G.

Damages to Structures

P 2,600,000.00

X

Details of structure assessment are in Annex C,D,E,&G.

Disturbance Compensation

P 1,630,000.00

X

This includes the 182 PAFs @ P 10,000.00 per PAF or portion thereof.

Income Loss during demolition, transfer and house reconstruction

P 130,000.00

X

Income restoration during a 5-day period @ P500 per day will be provided PAPs with structures to be relocated (52 PAFs)

6. Relocation Expenses

P 200,000.00

X

During relocation, transfer and construction of houses, NIA will provide assistance in terms of labor and transportation to the re-settlers.


42 May 2003

Fund Source Items Cost ADB GOP

Comments

7. Replacement of Communal Resource: Provision of three water supply facilities to replace the ones lost.

P 400,000.00

X

There are 3 water supply source and facilities, which will be affected. NIA will provide replacement for the affected community.

Access Road/Bridge

P 6,000,000.00

X

The submersion of the spillway road will mean the loss of access to the other side of Can-asujan where the community center is. A one lane concrete bridge will be provided as replacement.

Others: chapel

P 60,000.00

X

Two chapels lost in the submersion will need to be reconstructed.

8. Construction of Core Houses

P 2,600,000.00

X

Core houses valued at P 50,000.00 each will be provided for 52 PAFs

9. Organization, Training and Capacity Building

P 2,000,000.00

X

This will cover expenses related to organization, capacity building and livelihood development administration. An NGO will be contracted for this task.

10. Livelihood Fund

Vegetables – P 2,000,000.00 Aquaculture – P 5,000,000.00

X

The NGO will promote livelihood vegetable cultivation and aquaculture undertakings among the re-settlers and other concerned PAFs.

11. Evaluation Study

P 1,000,000.00

X

This budget is allocated to ensure the evaluation of resettlement impact by an external agency.

12. Subtotal

P 49,332,470.00

24,186,960

25,145,510

13. Contingency

P 3,946,598.00

1,934,957

2,011,641

8% of the total cost

14. Grand Total

P 53,279,068.00

26,121,917

27,157,151

10.2 Flow of Funds 95. Resettlement fund shall be provided by NIA as part of the SPISP budget. The allocation for the LARP shall be part of the Can-Asujan SRIP budget. Disbursement of resettlement cash compensation shall be done by the Cebu PIO upon endorsement by PAC of the assessed value of the lost assets.


43 May 2003

Disbursement for acquisition and development of resettlement land as well as related cost items shall be through the PIO under standard operating procedures. 96. All payment transaction shall be concurred by the concerned PAFs and witnessed by a duly designated representative of the Municipal Government.


44 May 2003

11.0 SUPERVISION AND MONITORING 11.1 Internal and External Monitoring 97. The monitoring system is established to ensure implementation and compliance with the requirements for compensation and resettlement including opportunities provided the re-settlers on livelihood development and financing. At the project level, a monitoring system has been established to ensure compliance with the programmed activities. The Central Project Management Office (CPMO) will undertake regular review of the process of implementation of the Plan. At the field level (Cebu-PIO), an interagency committee with representatives from the PAF/Ps has been tasked with monitoring and evaluation of the LARP as part of the compliance to the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) process. Likewise, the Grievance Redress Committee participated in by PAF representatives, is tasked with addressing complaints and problems with regard to compensation and resettlement issues. Women will be the priority focus of the organization and training. Members will be trained and plans will be formulated. Viable projects will be financed using fund from the seed money. 98. Resettlement monitoring shall commence when the LARP implementation begins. It shall follow the progress of the relocation and resettlement program against the time schedule as outlined. It would verify that certain milestones (critical activities) have been satisfactorily completed, e.g., resettlement site acquired, or civil works (roads, power and water access) completed. Furthermore, one of the major tasks in the monitoring plan is to verify the income losses of displaced households and that income replacement or restoration is being undertaken. The monitoring will need to be conducted more frequently as the resettlement program progresses. Those in charge will have to continue tracking the lives of the re-settlers in the new site until such time as the settlement has stabilized and that households are now engaged in productive economic endeavors to replace income losses. Internal Monitoring 99. As part of an internal monitoring mechanism, the CPMO and the Consultant Group will evaluate the implementation and outcome of the LARP. The Rural Sociologist of the Consultant Group will work very closely with the IDOs involved in the resettlement activities. A more detailed monitoring plan will be developed based on the implementation program of the LARP.

100. The results of the monitoring activities with appropriate recommendations will be reported back to the NIA officials and the community concerned. This will be the basis for subsequent dialogues and community consultation for further actions. An ex-post evaluation of the resettlement activities will be conducted to assess the effectiveness, impact and sustainability of resettlement entitlements and generate lessons for future policy formulation and planning. The CPMO will commission the Consultant Group to undertake this activity to ensure complete and unbiased information.


45 May 2003

External Evaluation 101. An agency specialized in social sciences will be responsible for conducting an independent external evaluation of the resettlement program. This agency shall be called the External Evaluation Agency (EEA). The EEA shall be contracted to carry out a post-implementation evaluation study of resettlement to assess whether or not the resettlement objectives are achieved and the PAF/Ps are able to improve their living standard. A Term of Reference for the external evaluation of LARP implementation is included in Annex M. The EEA shall commence its work 6 months after the full completion of the LARP relocation and compensation payment and two years after the implementation of its livelihood development or rehabilitation component. 11.2 Schedules 102. An implementation schedule is presented in Figure 5. This is based on three phases: (i) Pre-resettlement Phase; (ii) Resettlement; and (iii) Post Resettlement Phase. The relationship of these phases to the Construction Phase of the Dam and the Reservoir is also discussed. 103. The resettlement program including the social preparation phase and land acquisition and development stage will be implemented within a period of two years, which has started in January 2001.

i. Pre-resettlement Phase 104. The remaining activities under this Phase are as follows:

a. Cost Estimates of Structures and other improvements

From March 2001 to present, the IDO with the assistance of the technical staff of the Provincial Irrigation Office had been conducting a detailed inventory of assets within the affected area. Measurement of houses and other structures of the PAF/Ps were taken, the type and quantity of construction materials assessed and cost were estimated based on the current market prices. Likewise, crops and trees on the land were identified in terms of type, quantity and growth status. Value of these crops and trees was also appraised. The Cebu Provincial Appraisal Committee undertook the final assessment and valuation with the concerned PAFs before final payment of compensation is effected.

1. Cebu-PIO, LUGs, Aps2. Consultant, IDO3. Cebu PIO, Consultant4. Cebu PIO, Consultant5.

6. Cebu-PIO7. Prov. Appraisal Com8. Cebu-PIO9. Cebu-PIO

Phase II:

1. Cebu-PIO, cooperatives agencies, LGU, Aps

2.3.

4. Cebu-PIO5. Aps, Cebu-PIO6.

7. NIA Cebu PIO,Contractor

1.

2. IDOs3. IDOs4.

of members and Livelihood development5. Aps6. CPMO-SPMO

Cebu-PIO, Aps

Information Dissemination andIDOs, Aps, LGU

Compensation Payment

Community Mobilization

Resettlement Site Identification and

Site Development and Construction of Core houses Land Acquisition

IDOs

ApsReconstruction and Improvement of Houses

Interagency Coordination/Meeting for Relocation Activities

Monitoring and Evaluation

Formation of Livelihood groups and Training

Implementation of Livelihood projects

Formation of Working Groups

Post Resettlement

in the assigned lots

Formulation of Community Development Plan

Figure 5. Land Acquisition and Resettlement Plan (LARP) Implementation ScheduleCan-Asujan Areas

Final Appraisal of Compensation

Socioeconomic SurveyCommunity Consultations and Dialogues

No

vD

ec

2001

Civil Works and Construction of Replacement

into Homeowners Association

Activities

Community Consultation and Dialogue

Phase III:

Structure and communal Facilities

Organization/Mobilization of Aps

2002 2003 2004

Jul

Au

gS

ep Oct

Mar

Ap

r

Au

gS

ep Oct

Cost Estimation/Valuation

Pre-Relocation/Social Preparation Activities

Ap

rM

ayJu

nJu

l

Dec

Jun

No

vD

ecJa

nF

eb

May

Jan

Feb

Mar

Au

gS

ep Oct

No

v

Ap

rM

ayJu

nJu

l

Dec

Jan

Feb

Mar

Au

gS

ep Oct

No

v

Ap

rM

ayJu

nJu

l

Jan

FebResponsibility

MarActivity

Phase I:

Issuance of Notice to Vacate

MSWDO, IDOs

Assignment of LotsDismantling, Demolition and Transfer

Final Parcellary, Asset Inventory

Relocation and Resettlement Activities


47 May 2003

b. Resettlement Land Acquisition

Based on the result of the survey, not all PAF/Ps had expressed the desire to relocate to the proposed resettlement site. There are some PAF/Ps whose lands are only partially affected. They opted to just transfer their houses outside the affected area beyond the buffer zone. There are also other PAF/Ps who opted for cash compensation. Their primary source of income is not from land cultivation. The project provides them the opportunity to move closer to their place of work. For those who opted to relocate to the proposed resettlement site, NIA has negotiated for the acquisition of a 10.2 ha of agricultural land in Bgy. Guadalupe in Carcar, The said land is located close to the current place of residence of the PAF/Ps. It has an access road with a National Power Corporation (NPC) power line nearby. Also near the property is a NIA-constructed irrigation facility, which can be tapped as source of drinking water as well as irrigation. The PAFs who know of the area are amenable to having this as the resettlement site.

c. Site Development and construction of core houses and other

facilities

Immediately after the proposed resettlement site is acquired, NIA is going to develop it. Site development plan will include the subdivision of the area into plots for residential need and agricultural activities. Access to electricity will be made available with NIA facilitating the connection from the nearby National Power Corporation power line to the site: however, the PAF/Ps will be responsible for the individual house connection. Likewise, NIA will tap into the existing water supply source and provide the re-settlers access to communal domestic water as well as irrigation supply in the site. Access road to the site and within the site will be improved and/or provided. This will have to be discussed with the PAF/Ps and incorporated in the community development plan of the re-settlers.

The Project will also construct core houses to ensure that they would have ready houses to move to. The cost of construction of the core houses would be part of the compensation for lost structures. The PAF/Ps can improve/expand the core house using old materials from dismantled structures as well as purchase additional materials, using their compensation proceeds. NIA will assist them in the purchase and transport of materials from source to the resettlement site. d. Compensation Payment

Before the order to dismantle the old houses and vacate the area included in the proposed submerged area will be issued, the PAF/Ps will be paid their equivalent compensation based on the entitlement matrix prepared and agreed by them. The basis for the compensation will be on a per lot arrangement. Based on the plot mapping, census and socioeconomic surveys, the cultivator and


48 May 2003

co-cultivator or resident of the lot have all been identified including the one responsible for the improvement (e.g., the one who planted the crop) of the plot. The structures, trees and crops on the individual lots have been inventoried and assessed. Payment of compensation will go directly to the one responsible for either the construction of the structures and/or caused the cultivation and/or planting of crops and tree. In case of sharing between the main cultivator and absentee land “claimant”, an agreed formula for sharing should have been arrived at. Arbitration will be facilitated by NIA through the Grievance and Redress Committee. There will be no double payment of disturbance compensation. Whoever is cultivating the plot and/or residing within the said plot shall be paid a onetime disturbance fee. In the case of a plot, with an absentee claimant and designated cultivator, equal sharing (50-50 percent) of the disturbance fee shall be observed. Upon payment of the compensation, the PAF/Ps will be asked to sign the Memorandum of Understanding, which outlines the terms and conditions of the resettlement and compensation plan and waiver to future claims.

In cases of complaints or problems concerning the payment of entitlements, the Grievance and Redress Committee shall be responsible for arbitration. The process of addressing such cases is outlined in the relevant section of this Report.

e. Issuance to PAF/Ps of Notice to Vacate Upon payment of compensation, the NIA Provincial Irrigation Office shall issue the official notice to vacate the property to all concerned PAF/Ps. However, this would also assume that aside from the payment of compensation, the resettlement site is already prepared to absorb the re-settlers. ii. Phase II: Relocation/Resettlement Activities

a. Interagency Coordination for Relocation and Dismantling Activities

To prepare for the scheduled relocation and resettlement, interagency meetings will be held, to ensure the cooperation and assistance of various government agencies as well as community organization. NIA Cebu PIO will coordinate with the Office of the Mayor of Carcar, MARO, CENRO, MSWDO, PNP, MAO, MHO, NGOs, municipal and barangay officials, civic organizations and NGOs to prepare for the dismantling and relocation activities.

b. Information Dissemination and Community Mobilization

As soon as the schedule for the dismantling, demolition and transfer is finalized, the concerned communities, PAFs and the barangays officials as well as the cooperating agencies would have to be duly informed. The community will be mobilized into various action groups, e.g., grievance


49 May 2003

redress committee, task force for the following activities: demolition and transfer, construction assistance, homeowners’ association, etc.

c. Assignment of Lots

Prior to the relocation schedule, the concerned PAFs will already have been assigned their designated plots of land. NIA will determine the said assignment in close coordination with the PAFs and incorporated as part of the site development plan.

d. Issuance of Notice or Order to Dismantle/Demolish the structures

and Vacate the Property Demolition Order and Notice to Vacate the Property will be issued to individual PAPs to ensure that they are officially informed of the schedule. This would be done after they have been duly paid their compensation and assigned their relocation plots in the resettlement site. This notice will be sent 30 days before the scheduled dismantling and transfer schedule.

e. Actual Dismantling/Demolition and Transfer

During the demolition of the houses of the PAFs and the transfer of the materials to the relocation site, the NIA will extend logistical support. Vehicles will be provided to transport the procured materials from source to resettlement site.

In the dismantling and demolition of the structures, the PAPs shall provide the labor. However, they will be paid by NIA on a daily basis for a period of four days.

For the reconstruction of houses, cost for labor is already built in as 20 percent of the total cost of compensation for the structure loss.

f. Re-construction of Houses in the Assigned Lots

This is the primary responsibility of the PAFs but assistance in the procurement and transport of construction materials shall be extended by NIA.

g. Civil Works and Construction of Replacement Structures and

Communal Water Facilities The Project will have to replace the communal resource and properties that will be lost as a result of the submersion of the affected areas. A spring box and three water sources will need to be provided for the existing community in both Can-asujan and Calidngan, who will lose access to the submerged resources and facilities. Likewise, there are two chapels (one in each concerned barangays) that will be affected. NIA will also have to provide replacement for these structures. A major structure affected is part of the access road passing through the water spillway leading to the community


50 May 2003

center of Bgy. Can-asujan. NIA proposes to replace this by way of construction of a one lane concrete bridge spanning around 40 meters of a narrow point upstream of the Can-asujan River

iii. Phase III: Post-Resettlement Activities

a. Organization and Mobilization of Re-settlers into a Homeowners

Association

As soon as the re-settlers are settled in the new site and their houses had been rebuilt, NIA and cooperating agencies like MSWDO and an NGO will mobilize and organize them into homeowners’ association and livelihood groups. A Community Plan will be formulated to ensure that community concerns are discussed and solutions to problems especially concerning livelihood and income generation are undertaken.

b. Community Consultation and Dialogue Continuing consultation and dialogue will be undertaken to provide venue for airing the re-settlers’ complaints and grievances concerning the implementation of the LARP. The Homeowners’ Association will be responsible for hearing complaints and endorsing meritorious cases to the NIA.

c. Formulation of Community Development Plan

This Plan will address community concerns of the re-settlers. The Plan is expected to be in place by the second semester of 2003. Participation of all community members will be encouraged in the discussion of issues and formulation of action response. The local government representatives, NGOs, and civic organizations will be invited to participate and assist in the realization of the Plan.

d. Organization, Skills Development and Capability Building

As part of an effort to ensure that the resettled community stand on its on, NIA in cooperation with such agency as the Department of Agriculture, Social Welfare and Development and others as well as the contracted NGO will spearhead an effort to organize livelihood groups and provide skills training for community members especially in the area of livelihood development and income generating activities. Details of this will be incorporated in the Community Development Plan. NIA will also provide seed capital to finance viable projects/activities particularly in vegetable cultivation and aquaculture. All PAFs are potential beneficiaries but the women groups will be given priority for this intervention.

e. Monitoring and Evaluation

The officers of the Homeowners Association will be trained to ensure their capability in representing the community. The officers will be responsible


51 May 2003

for monitoring the implementation of the LARP. They will participate and coordinate with an External Monitoring Group most likely an NGO in reviewing the effectiveness and impact of the resettlement scheme as well as the actual action on the compensation scheme.

They will also be charged with the collection of the monthly amortization of the individual lot owners, which need to be remitted to NIA.

11.3 Indicators for Monitoring and Evaluation 105. The following indicators in Table 9 will be used to conduct the internal monitoring process. Table 9. Indicators for Internal Monitoring Indicator to Measure Effectiveness of the LARP

Basis for Indicator

Budget and Time Frame Adequate training, personnel, funds, maintenance of schedule of activities

Delivery of Entitlements Entitlements, relocation schedule, housing, development of site, social services, training for restoration of income and living standards

Consultation, Grievance and Special Issues

Consultation, announcements/notification, conflicts, resolution/redress of grievances, special considerations (indigenous people, women, children, health issues)

Benefit Monitoring Changes compared to baseline – occupation, incomes, expenditures, level of acceptance by PAP Changes to special groups -- indigenous people, women, children


52 May 2003

106. The following indicators in Table 10 are to be used for the external monitoring program. Table 10. Indicators for External Monitoring Indicator to Measure Impact on PAFs Basis for Indicator Selected socioeconomic information on PAFs – compared to baseline

Establish current condition of PAFs – location, households, social services and cultural activities access, housing, occupation, land use, agricultural production, community based activities, value of assets

Restoration of living standards – compared to baseline

Status of entitlements, sense of community changed/improved, restoration / replacement of social and cultural aspects

Restoration of livelihoods – compared to baseline

Status of assistance for resettlement, compensation (completed, ongoing, delayed), income generating activities reestablished, level of incomes, job opportunities and employment

Levels of PAFs satisfaction with resettlement process

Understanding and acceptance of the resettlement plan, expectation met, exceeded, shortfall

Effectiveness of resettlement plan Other impacts

Accuracy of census/baseline, time and budget sufficient, unforeseen problems, special groups -- indigenous people, women, children Environmental issues, other intended impacts – employment, community


53 May 2003

REFERENCES 1. Asian Development Bank, 1998. Handbook on Resettlement: A Guide to

Good Practice. Manila, Philippines. 2. ________, 1995. Involuntary Resettlement. Manila, Philippines. 3. ________, 1999. Resettlement Policy and Practice in Southeast Asia and

the Pacific: Proceedings of Workshops held in Manila and Port Vila 1998. Manila, Philippines.

4. Hassal and Associates Pty, 1998. Ltd., Southern Philippines Irrigation

Sector Project (ADB TA No. 2841-PHI)- Final Report. Quezon City, Philippines.

5. National Statistical Coordination Board, 2000. Philippine Statistical

Yearbook 2000. Manila, Philippines. 6. National Bookstore, Reprint, 1990. The 1987 Constitution of the Republic of

the Philippines. Manila, Philippines. 7. Southern Philippines Irrigation Sector Project, 2001. Socioeconomic Survey

of the Affected Households of the Can-Asujan SRIS: Report of the Second Input by the Rural Sociologist. Quezon City, Philippines.

8. Water Resources Development Project, Philippines, 1996. Policy

Framework for Resettlement of Project Affected Families of the Improvement and Repair of National Irrigation Systems (NIS) Component. Quezon City, Philippines.

Complete List of PAPs in the

Submerged and Dam Areas

Note: see Annex N for samples of signed agreements for compensation. All compensation agreements are available in the Can-asujan Subproject Office, Carcar, Cebu.

a n n e x A

Submerged Area

No Name of APs Category Plot No. Size of Plot Resettlemet Option1 Macaron, Doisdado Main Cultivator 43 0.1466 Full-Resettlement

44 0.096448 0.1082

22A cliff2 Candado, Mariolito Main Cultivator 96 0.2987 Full-Resettlement3 Aledon, Danilo Main Cultivator 81A 0.2325 Full-Resettlement4 Racoma, Teodorico Main Cultivator 58 0.0798 Full-Resettlement5 Larrobis, Evaristo Main Cultivator 57 0.0990 Full-Resettlement6 Canoy, Bonifacio Main Cultivator 37 0.0792 Full-Resettlement

25 0.077628 0.093627 0.2429

7 Tangaro, Severa Main Cultivator 7 0.4229 Full-Resettlement8 Canania, Roberto Main Cultivator 68 0.25359 Ochia, Leonardo Main Cultivator 94 0.4318 Full-Resettlement

10 Alcuirez, Agustin Main Cultivator 23 0.0296 Full-Resettlement39 0.1704

11 Pahayahay, Felicisimo Main Cultivator 45 0.5572 Full-Resettlement49 0.903159 0.2513

12 Larrobis, Serapio Main Cultivator 56 0.3880 Full-Resettlement13 Abellanosa, Sergio Main Cultivator 54 0.4085 Full-Resettlement14 Alcuirez, Juanito Main Cultivator 38 0.4052 Full-Resettlement15 Abellana, Maximina Main Cultivator 105 0.7327 Full-Resettlement16 Alcuirez, Guillermo Main Cultivator 16 0.1138 Full-Resettlement17 Soterol, Anastacio Main Cultivator 87 0.1142 Full-Resettlement

97 0.7163100 0.0289

18 Aledon, Silvino Jr. Main Cultivator 32 0.0070 Full-Resettlement61 0.2407

19 Abellana, Bernardo Main Cultivator 107 0.0453 Full-Resettlement

MASTERLIST OF APs IN THE SUBMERGED AND DAM AREAS

Page 1 of 10

No Name of APs Category Plot No. Size of Plot Resettlemet Option104 0.5699

20 Aledon, Teodorico Main Cultivator 75A 0.0150 Full-Resettlement83 0.4867

21 Alcuirez, Tomas Main Cultivator 42 0.0352 Full-Resettlement9 0.1788

10 0.211815 0.064936 0.0375

22 Aledon, Constancio Main Cultivator 76 1.2273 Full-Resettlement23 Tumulak, Leopoldo Main Cultivator 47 1.0512 Full-Resettlement

86 0.311898 0.1728

24 Gaviola, Eugenio Main Cultivator 50 0.3059 Full-Resettlement51 0.040353 0.2470

25 Nadela, Ponciano Sr. Main Cultivator 72 1.0324 Full-Resettlement71A 0.0380

Dam 17 0.437218 0.0359

26 Canania, Gloria Main Cultivator 66 0.2884 Full-Resettlement68A 0.0590

69 0.047327 Nadela, Martiniano Main Cultivator 73 0.7010 Full-Resettlement28 Abellanosa, Pelagio Main Cultivator 84 0.8620 Full-Resettlement

75D 0.009029 Canania, Jaime Main Cultivator 91 0.1577 Full-Resettlement30 Larrobis, Gerardo Main Cultivator 52 0.1140 Full-Resettlement31 Mangyao, Emmanuel Main Cultivator 88 0.4531 Full-Resettlement32 Nadela, Ponciano Jr. Main Cultivator 71 0.3417 Full-Resettlement33 Ochia, Ignacio Main Cultivator 74 0.0201 Full-Resettlement

95 0.545734 Candado, Reynaldo Main Cultivator 85 0.1176 Full-Resettlement35 Canania, Lorenzo Sr. Main Cultivator 92 0.0650 Full-Resettlement36 Guingona, Mario Main Cultivator 106 0.1062 Full-Resettlement37 Ricarte, Lorna Main Cultivator 34 0.1879 Full-Resettlement

Page 2 of 10

No Name of APs Category Plot No. Size of Plot Resettlemet Option38 Gaviola, Rodrigo Main Cultivator 20 0.0725 Full-Resettlement

22 0.026340 Tanodra, Natividad Main Cultivator Resident Only Full-Resettlement41 Ricarte, Eutiquio Main Cultivator Resident Only Full-Resettlement42 Tanudra , Anecito Main-Cultivator 119 0.6900 Financial Compensation

120 0.4328123 0.1406

124B 0.040043 Ochia , Severino Main-Cultivator 93 0.1773 Financial Compensation44 Canania , Lorenzo Jr. Main-Cultivator 90 0.1618 Financial Compensation45 Lastima , Cornelio Main-Cultivator 30 0.0716 Financial Compensation46 Alcuirez , Emmanuel Main-Cultivator 41 0.3393 Financial Compensation47 Bornea , Rodelita Main-Cultivator 57A 0.0290 Financial Compensation48 Laurden , Mauro Main-Cultivator 62 0.0592 Financial Compensation49 Gelledo , Jose Main-Cultivator 26 0.5064 Financial Compensation50 Alcuirez , Bernardo Main-Cultivator 46 0.0030 Financial Compensation51 Alcuirez , Raymundo Main-Cultivator 33 0.2660 Financial Compensation52 Tanudra , Aurelio Main-Cultivator 63 0.0602 Financial Compensation53 Alcuirez , Melchor Main-Cultivator 46A 0.0526 Financial Compensation54 Abellanosa, Virgilio Main-Cultivator 11 0.4167 Financial Compensation55 Abellanosa, Felicidad Main-Cultivator 55 0.4135 Financial Compensation56 Castanares, Andres Main-Cultivator 13 0.2688 Financial Compensation57 Larrobis , Cesario Main-Cultivator 31 0.0393 Financial Compensation58 Panes , Ariel Main-Cultivator 29 0.2022 Financial Compensation

21 0.4348 50A 0.0100

59 Gaviola , Benita Main-Cultivator 60 0.238l Financial Compensation60 Cuizon , Olimpia Main-Cultivator 123 0.0225 Financial Compensation61 Quijano , Artemio Main-Cultivator 122 0.3079 Financial Compensation62 Remeticado, Gordiano Main-Cultivator 103 0.1772 Financial Compensation63 Tangaro , Paterno Main-Cultivator 110 0.2235 Financial Compensation64 Teneca , Juliana Main-Cultivator 110B 0.0190 Financial Compensation65 Bacus , Lucino Main-Cultivator 125 0.0110 Financial Compensation66 Candado , Wilfredo Main-Cultivator 126 0.0120 Financial Compensation67 Abayata , Zoila Main-Cultivator 127 0.0070 Financial Compensation

Page 3 of 10

No Name of APs Category Plot No. Size of Plot Resettlemet Option68 Sato , Catalino Main-Cultivator 70 0.0175 Financial Compensation69 Mensinades, Rufino Main-Cultivator 115 0.0784 Financial Compensation70 Aledon , Flora Main-Cultivator 75B 0.0070 Financial Compensation71 Segismar , pableo Main-Cultivator 128 0.00l0 Financial Compensation72 Quijano , Rogelio Main-Cultivator 121A 0.0335 Financial Compensation73 Abella , Reynaldo Main-Cultivator 109 0.1366 Financial Compensation

113 0.0694 74 Aledon , Antonio Main-Cultivator 75 0.1008 Financial Compensation75 Arguso , Monica Main-Cultivator 102 0.1473 Financial Compensation76 Baclaan , Celerino Main-Cultivator 115 0.0225 Financial Compensation77 Canania , Geminigildo Main-Cultivator 64 0.2130 Financial Compensation

64A 0.1389 78 Canania , Teodora Main-Cultivator 65 0.1276 Financial Compensation

67 0.1406 79 Dayanan , Meriam Main-Cultivator 124 0.01420 Financial Compensation80 Embalsado, Clemente Main-Cultivator 116 0.2094 Financial Compensation81 Isola , Sarah Main-Cultivator 101 0.0539 Financial Compensation82 Quijano , Benigna Main-Cultivator 124A 0.2236 Financial Compensation83 Remeticado, Maximo Main-Cultivator 121 0.3841 Financial Compensation84 Rosiana , Sopronio Main-Cultivator 118 0.0922 Financial Compensation

118A 0.0468 85 Sato , Primitiva Main-Cultivator 111 0.6790 Financial Compensation86 Tanudra , Antonio Main-Cultivator 123A 0.0054 Financial Compensation87 Teneca , Eleuterio Main-Cultivator 112 0.01250 Financial Compensation88 Uybobolante, Florentino Main-Cultivator 82 0.2566 Financial Compensation89 Uybobolante, Teodorico Main-Cultivator 99 0.0576 Financial Compensation90 Baclaan , Juan Main-Cultivator 103B 0.0780 Financial Compensation91 Aledon , Natividad Main-Cultivator 81 0.3680 Financial Compensation92 Canania , Nestor Main-Cultivator 89 0.1720 Financial Compensation93 Lapasaran , Irenio Main-Cultivator 114 0.0575 Financial Compensation94 Cuizon , Vicente Main-Cultivator 123C cliff Financial Compensation95 Baclaan , Felisa Main-Cultivator 103A 0.0560 Financial Compensation96 Tanudra , Flaviano Main-Cultivator 110A 0.0995 Financial Compensation97 Alcoseba , Remedios Main-Cultivator 117 0.2328 Financial Compensation98 Tangaro , Constancio Main-Cultivator 108 0.0927 Financial Compensation

Page 4 of 10

No Name of APs Category Plot No. Size of Plot Resettlemet Option99 Ochia , Rosendo Main-Cultivator 77 0.0134 Financial Compensation

77A 0.0126 75C 0.0030

100 Aledon , Primitiva Main-Cultivator cliff Financial Compensation101 Candado , Fernando Main-Cultivator 79 0.0887 Financial Compensation

80 0.0468 102 Aledon, Condrado Main-Cultivator 85A 0.0065 Financial Compensation103 Abasolo , Hipolito Resident Financial Compensation104 Quinez , Pablo Resident Financial Compensation105 Soterol , Donato Resident Financial Compensation106 Quinez , Leonardo Resident Financial Compensation107 Balbena , Gayud Claimant 103A 0.0560 Financial Compensation108 Tanginan , Antonio Claimant 1 1.1531 Financial Compensation109 Bacatan , Luciana Claimant 2 0.0470 Financial Compensation110 Tanginan , Mamerta Claimant 9 0.1788 Financial Compensation

36 0.0375111 Abella , Alejandra Claimant 3 0.2227 Financial Compensation112 Abellanosa, Teofila Claimant 4 0.1174 Financial Compensation113 Paner , Ronnie Claimant 10 0.2118 Financial Compensation114 Abellanosa, Anunsasion Claimant 12 0.2287 Financial Compensation115 Abellanosa, Arcadia Claimant 13 0.2688 Financial Compensation116 Saducas , Natalio Claimant 15 0.0649 Financial Compensation

23 0.029639 0.170424 0.169129 0.202226 0.506427 0.242928 0.093625 0.077634 0.187935 0.080137 0.079238 0.405240 0.2346

Page 5 of 10

No Name of APs Category Plot No. Size of Plot Resettlemet Option41 0.3393

117 Lumba , Jacinto Claimant 16 0.1138 Financial Compensation118 Alcuirez , Francisco Claimant 19 0.186 Financial Compensation

31 0.0393045 0.5572

119 Aledon , Jimmy Claimant 45 0.5572 Financial Compensation44 0.0964

120 Enad , Liberato Claimant 87 0.1142 Financial Compensation48 0.108249 0.9031

121 Enad , Victorio Claimant 43 0.1466 Financial Compensation79 0.0887

8 0.046884 0.86286 0.311896 0.298797 0.7163

122 Abellanosa, Pelagio Claimant 50 0.3059 Financial Compensation51 0.040353 0.2470

50A 0.010052 0.114054 0.4085

123 Heirs of Marcela Ramos Claimant 55 0.4135 Financial Compensation56 0.388057 0.0990

57A 0.029058 0.079864 0.213065 0.127666 0.2884

68A 0.059069 0.047367 0.140668 0.2535

Page 6 of 10

No Name of APs Category Plot No. Size of Plot Resettlemet Option85 0.111188 0.453189 0.172090 0.161891 0.1577

124 Enad , Solidad Claimant 59 0.2513 Financial Compensation60 0.238162 0.592261 0.2407

64A 0.1389125 Llanto , Crispin Claimant 71 0.3417 Financial Compensation

72 1.032471A 0.0380

73 0.701075 0.1008

126 Montesa , Romeo Claimant 76 1.2273 Financial Compensation81 0.3680

81A 0.232582 0.256683 0.4867

127 Aledon , Raymona Claimant 77 0.0260 Financial Compensation128 Aledon , Benigna Claimant 77A cliff Financial Compensation129 Candado , Tarcela Claimant 78 0.1358 Financial Compensation130 Ochia , Juliet Claimant 94 0.4318 Financial Compensation131 Abella , Lucia Claimant 95 0.5457 Financial Compensation132 Baclaan , Melchora Claimant 99 0.0576 Financial Compensation133 Tangaro , Maxima Claimant 100 0.0.289 Financial Compensation

101 0.0539102 0.1473

134 Abellanosa, Venancio Claimant 104 0.5699 Financial Compensation135 Enad , Arturo Claimant 105 0.7327 Financial Compensation

106 0.1062107 0.0453

136 Enad , Antonio Claimant 108 0.0927 Financial Compensation137 Tanudra , Pantaleon Claimant 110A 0.0995 Financial Compensation

Page 7 of 10

No Name of APs Category Plot No. Size of Plot Resettlemet Option138 Sato , Tanacia Claimant 111 0.6790 Financial Compensation139 Teneca , Alejandro Claimant 112 0.0125 Financial Compensation140 Ong , Willy Atty. Claimant 113 0.0694 Financial Compensation141 Mensinades, Narciso Claimant 114 0.0575 Financial Compensation142 Tatoy . Melecio Claimant 115A 0.2250 Financial Compensation143 Heirs of Juaquin Soronio Claimant 116 0.2094 Financial Compensation

117 0.2328119 0.6990120 0.4323124 0.1420

144 Sayta, Sayta Claimant 118 0.0922 Financial Compensation145 Pano , Amon Claimant 118A 0.0468 Financial Compensation146 Quijano , Vicente Claimant 121 0.3841 Financial Compensation147 Montesa , Cesar Claimant 123 0.1406 Financial Compensation

124B 0.0400124A 0.2236

148 Montesa , Paz Claimant 123A 0.0054 Financial CompensationTOTAL 28.6851

Page 8 of 10

Dam Area

Name of Aps Category Plot No. Size of Plot Resettlemet Option149 Satinitigan , Maura Main- Cultivator dam 2 1.0501 Financial Compensation150 Lantape , Claudio Sr. Main- Cultivator dam 8 1.2561 Financial Compensation151 Tantog , Marcela Main- Cultivator dam 9 0.5382 Financial Compensation152 Castanares, Eugenio Main- Cultivator dam 10 0.3714 Financial Compensation153 Lantape , Claudio Jr. Main- Cultivator dam 11 0.0909 Financial Compensation154 Marfil , Apolinaria Main- Cultivator dam 12 0.0781 Financial Compensation155 Paner , Helario Resident Financial Compensation156 Satinitigan , Wilma Resident Financial Compensation157 Satinitigan , Samuel Resident Financial Compensation158 Tantog , Roberta Main-Cultivator dam 1 0.1484 Financial Compensation159 Gaviola , Catalina Main-Cultivator Financial Compensation160 Gaviola , Beronico Main-Cultivator Financial Compensation161 Abellanosa, Roberta Main-Cultivator dam 3 1.5003 Financial Compensation162 Cuizon , Arlene Main-Cultivator dam 4 0.2780 Financial Compensation163 Tantog , Renario Main-Cultivator dam 7 0.2894 Financial Compensation164 Lantape, Renato Main-Cultivator dam 13 1.2611 Financial Compensation165 Enad , Quilino Claimant dam 1 0.1483 Financial Compensation166 Cacafranca, Antolin Claimant dam 2 1.0501 Financial Compensation

dam 15 1.5285167 Alesna , Renato Claimant dam 4 0.2780 Financial Compensation

dam 8 1.2561168 Tantog , Mariano Claimant dam 7 0.2894 Financial Compensation

dam 12 0.0781169 Abella , Pascual Claimant dam 10 0.3714 Financial Compensation170 Tantog , Severina Claimant dam 11 0.0909 Financial Compensation171 Tantog , Faustino Claimant dam 14 0.2134 Financial Compensation172 Satinitigan, Andrea Claimant dam 16 0.5571 Financial Compensation

TOTAL 6.862

Page 9 of 10

SUBMERGED AND DAM AREA

Name of APs Category Plot No. Size of Plot Resettlemet Option173 Abasolo , Eugenio Main-Cultivator 8 0.6794 Financial Compensation

6 0.166224 0.1679

dam 18 0.1993174 Paner , Rufa Main-Cultivator 17 0.1531 Financial Compensation

dam 16 0.5571175 Lantape , Roque Main-Cultivator 1 1.1513 Financial Compensation

dam 6 1.6836176 Cuizon , Carolina Main-Cultivator 4 0.2227 Financial Compensation

3 0.1174dam 5 1.0567

177 Satinitigan, Rogelio Main-Cultivator 2 0.0470 Financial Compensation5 0.0103

12 0.2287dam 15 1.5285

178 Tangaro , Apolonio Main-Cultivator 35 0.0801 Financial Compensation179 Tangaro , Aurea Main-Cultivator 19 0.1860 Financial Compensation

dam 14 0.2134180 Tanginan , Apolonio Co-Cultivator 5 0.0103 Financial Compensation

11 0.4167dam 6 1.6836

14 0.1679181 Tantog , Maria Co-Cultivator 6 0.1662 Financial Compensation182 Reyes , Alfonso Co-Cultivator 7 0.4229 Financial Compensation

TOTAL 8.2353

Page 10 of 10

Complete List of PAPs in the

Rice and Vegetable Areas


a n n e x B

List of PAF/Ps for Full Resettlement and their

Compensation Package


a n n e x C

LIST OF APs FOR RELOCATION AND FINANCIAL COMPENSATION

2 3 5 6 7 8 10Size SIZE OF CORE TYPE COMPENSATION Assessed Value INCOME SUB TOTAL

of REPLACEMENT FOR HOUSE OF FOR of Crops RESTORATION

Name of APs Category Plot LAND FREE STRUCTURE STRUCTURE Main Cultivator 4X200/DAY Main Cultivator

1 Macaron, Diosdado Main Cultivator 0.3512 0.2107 139,500.00 50,000.00 house, kitchen 16,943.00 22,361.50 5,000.00 800.00 78,882.00

2 Candado, Mariolito Main Cultivator 0.2987 0.1792 94,500.00 50,000.00 house, pigpen, poultry 67,454.00 11,342.10 5,000.00 800.00 134,596.10 3 Aledon, Danilo Main Cultivator 0.2325 0.1395 76,500.00 50,000.00 house 55,968.00 252.00 5,000.00 800.00 112,020.00 4 Racoma, Teodorico Main Cultivator 0.0798 0.0479 45,000.00 50,000.00 house 9,292.00 12,056.10 5,000.00 800.00 77,148.10 5 Larrobis, Evaristo Main Cultivator 0.0990 0.0594 49,500.00 50,000.00 house 13,733.00 14,091.70 5,000.00 800.00 83,624.70 6 Canoy, Bonifacio Main Cultivator 0.4933 0.2960 81,000.00 50,000.00 house,pigpen,rest house 70,880.00 14,079.80 5,000.00 800.00 126,680.00

7 Tangaro, Severa Main Cultivator 1.8592 1.1155 121,500.00 50,000.00 bodega-house 27,465.25 19,800.90 5,000.00 800.00 103,066.15 house & bodega -

8 Canania, Roberto Main Cultivator 0.2535 0.1521 81,000.00 50,000.00 house 45,295.00 9,176.30 5,000.00 800.00 110,271.30 9 Ochia, Leonardo Main Cultivator 0.4318 0.2591 121,500.00 50,000.00 house, bodega 82,315.00 17,876.60 5,000.00 800.00 155,991.60

10 Alcuirez, Agustin Main Cultivator 0.2000 0.1200 76,500.00 50,000.00 n o n e - 6,642.30 5,000.00 - 61,642.30 -

11 Pahayay, Felicisimo Main Cultivator 1.7116 0.6000 261,000.00 50,000.00 house,bodega,pigpen 34,511.00 114,613.10 5,000.00 119,634.80

12 Larrobis, Serapio Main Cultivator 0.3880 0.2328 108,000.00 50,000.00 house & pigpen 125,049.00 32,235.00 5,000.00 212,284.00 13 Abellanosa, Sergio Main Cultivator 0.4085 0.2451 112,500.00 50,000.00 house - 20,253.10 5,000.00 75,253.10 14 Alcuirez, Juanito Main Cultivator 0.4052 0.2431 126,000.00 50,000.00 house & pigpen 25,829.00 9,977.10 5,000.00 90,806.10 15 Abellana, Maximina Main Cultivator 0.7327 0.4396 193,500.00 50,000.00 house 26,236.00 40,257.70 5,000.00 800.00 122,293.70 16 Alcuirez, Guillermo Main Cultivator 0.1138 0.0683 63,000.00 50,000.00 bodega, house 44,350.00 5,686.10 5,000.00 800.00 105,836.10 17 Soterol, Anastacio Main Cultivator 0.8594 0.5156 220,500.00 50,000.00 23,429.00 38,209.50 5,000.00 800.00 81,766.50

18 Aledon, Silvino JR. Main Cultivator 0.2477 0.1486 72,000.00 50,000.00 house 21,887.00 19,422.20 5,000.00 800.00 78,118.20 18,991.00

19 Abellana, Bernardo Main Cultivator 0.6152 0.3691 162,000.00 50,000.00 n o n e 11,018.00 45,070.20 5,000.00 800.00 101,764.80

20 Aledon, Teodorico Main Cultivator 0.5017 0.3010 175,500.00 50,000.00 house,bodega,cr,candle house,rest-house,pigpen 59,224.00 18,522.00 5,000.00 800.00 119,686.00

21 Alcuirez, Tomas Main Cultivator 0.5282 0.3169 139,500.00 50,000.00 n o n e - 12,387.20 5,000.00 - 55,781.90

22 Aledon, Constancio Main Cultivator 1.2273 0.6000 256,500.00 50,000.00 house 138,600.00 49,266.70 5,000.00 242,866.70 23 Tumulak, Leopoldo Main Cultivator 1.5358 0.6000 256,500.00 50,000.00 house, pigpen 43,338.00 119,245.00 5,000.00 800.00 193,767.50

24 Gaviola, Eugenio Main Cultivator 0.5932 0.3559 153,000.00 50,000.00 house 27,823.00 42,714.70 5,000.00 800.00 126,337.70 - -

COMPENSATION

1 9 11REPLACEMENT LAND DISTURBANCE

4

Page 1 of 2

Size SIZE OF CORE TYPE COMPENSATION Assessed Value INCOME SUB TOTAL

of REPLACEMENT FOR HOUSE OF FOR of Crops RESTORATION

Name of APs Category Plot LAND FREE STRUCTURE STRUCTURE Main Cultivator 4X200/DAY Main Cultivator

COMPENSATION

REPLACEMENT LAND DISTURBANCE

25 Nadela Ponciano SR. Main Cultivator 1.1063 0.6000 256,500.00 50,000.00 house & bodega 126,298.00 38,292.60 5,000.00 800.00 201,000.10

0.437226 Canania, Gloria Main Cultivator 0.3947 0.2368 103,500.00 50,000.00 house & bodega 41,281.00 20,132.00 5,000.00 800.00 117,213.00

- 27 Nadela, Martiniano Main Cultivator 0.7010 0.4206 180,000.00 50,000.00 house 31,731.00 7,879.20 5,000.00 800.00 95,410.20 28 Abellanosa, Pelagio Main Cultivator 0.8710 0.5226 216,000.00 50,000.00 house & poultry 51,770.00 41,904.10 5,000.00 800.00 146,900.90

29 Canania, Jaime Main Cultivator 0.1577 0.0946 40,500.00 50,000.00 house, bodega 29,938.00 5,465.60 5,000.00 800.00 91,203.60 30 Larrobis, Gerardo Main Cultivator 0.1140 0.0684 27,000.00 50,000.00 house 24,365.00 6,593.30 5,000.00 800.00 86,758.30 31 Mangyao, Emmanuel Main Cultivator 0.4531 0.2719 112,500.00 50,000.00 house, animal house 27,868.00 13,447.00 5,000.00 800.00 97,115.00 32 Nadela, Ponciano JR. Main Cultivator 0.3417 0.2050 85,500.00 50,000.00 house 8,978.00 8,027.60 5,000.00 800.00 72,805.60 33 Ochia, Ignacio Main Cultivator 0.5658 0.3395 135,000.00 50,000.00 house 38,147.00 27,125.70 5,000.00 800.00 102,832.10

- - 34 Candado, Reynaldo Main Cultivator 0.2534 0.1520 72,000.00 50,000.00 none 24,059.00 5,000.00 72,603.60

35 Canania, Lorenzo SR. Main Cultivator 0.0650 0.0390 27,000.00 50,000.00 house 66,662.00 3,784.90 5,000.00 800.00 126,246.90 36 Guingona, Mario Main Cultivator 0.1062 0.0637 36,000.00 50,000.00 house 15,820.00 17,494.40 5,000.00 800.00 89,114.40 37 Ricarte, Lorna Main Cultivator 0.1879 0.1127 58,500.00 50,000.00 house 23,135.00 11,709.60 5,000.00 800.00 90,644.60 38 Gaviola, Rodrigo Main Cultivator 0.0988 0.0593 36,000.00 50,000.00 house 51,589.00 4,268.60 5,000.00 800.00 110,322.70

39 Amigo, Agosto Main Cultivator 0.2346 0.1408 76,500.00 50,000.00 house & pigpen 11,900.00 12,761.00 5,000.00 800.00 80,461.00 40 Tanodra, Natividad Resident Only 0.0075 0.0075 3,375.00 50,000.00 house & bodega 18,956.00 5,000.00 800.00 74,756.00 41 Ricarte, Eutiquio Resident Only 0.0075 0.0075 3,375.00 50,000.00 house 35,726.00 5,000.00 800.00 91,526.00

20.2707 10.96 4,655,250.00 2,050,000.00 1,574,803.25 938,483.50 205,000.00 26,400.00 4,536,024.35

Page 2 of 2

Relocation Site Development Plan

a n n e x D

Draft MOA Between the

NIA and PAF/Ps

a n n e x E

List of PAF/Ps for Transfer Assistance and/or

Compensation Only


a n n e x F

HOUSE TRANSFER and COMPENSATION

A. SUBMERGED AREASize of Plot Core House Structure Compensation Assessed Disturbance Income Transpo Total

Value of Crop Compensation Restoration Assistance

1 Tanudra, Anecito Main-Cultivator 1.3029 50,000.00 HOUSE 21,436.00 7,110.00 5,000.00 800.00 2,000.00 86,346.00

2 Ochia, Severino Main-Cultivator 0.1773 50,000.00 HOUSE 45,508.00 37,137.00 10,000.00 800.00 2,000.00 145,445.00

3 Canania, Lorenzo Jr. Main-Cultivator 0.1618 50,000.00 HOUSE 69,234.00 4,144.00 5,000.00 800.00 2,000.00 131,178.00

4 Lastima, Cornelio Main-Cultivator 0.0716 50,000.00 HOUSE 95,717.00 3,546.00 5,000.00 800.00 2,000.00 157,063.00

5 Alcuirez, Emmanuel Main-Cultivator 0.3393 50,000.00 HOUSE 40,773.00 20,073.00 5,000.00 800.00 2,000.00 118,646.00

6 Bornea, Rodelita Main-Cultivator 0.029 50,000.00 HOUSE 1,678.00 3,170.00 5,000.00 800.00 2,000.00 62,648.00

7 Laurden, Mauro Main-Cultivator 0.0592 50,000.00 HOUSE 9,435.00 34,108.00 5,000.00 800.00 2,000.00 101,343.00

8 Gelledo, Jose Main-Cultivator 0.5064 50,000.00 HOUSE 2,805.00 36,733.00 5,000.00 - 2,000.00 59,805.00

TOTAL 2.6475 400,000.00 286,586 146,021.00 45,000.00 5,600.00 16,000.00 862,474.00

B. DAM AREASize of Plot Core House Structure Compensation Value of Disturbance Income Transport Total

Crops compensation Restoration Assistance

1 Satinitigan, Maura Main- Cultivator 1.0501 50,000.00 House 62,893.00 11,615.00 5,000.00 800.00 2,000.00 82,308.00

2 Lantape, Claudio Sr. Main- Cultivator 1.2561 50,000.00 House 126,110.00 22,402.00 5,000.00 800.00 2,000.00 156,312.00

3 Tantog, Marcela Main- Cultivator 0.5382 50,000.00 House 38,328.00 9,410.00 5,000.00 800.00 2,000.00 55,538.00

4 Castanares, Eugenio Main- Cultivator 0.3714 50,000.00 House 18,284.00 9,247.00 5,000.00 800.00 2,000.00 35,331.00

5 Lantape, Claudio Jr. Main- Cultivator 0.0909 50,000.00 House 6,140.00 1,694.00 5,000.00 800.00 2,000.00 15,634.00

6 Marfil, Apolinaria Main- Cultivator 0.0781 50,000.00 House 5,231.00 1,598.00 5,000.00 800.00 2,000.00 14,629.00

7 Paner, Helario Resident 50,000.00 House 37,911.00 10,000.00 800.00 2,000.00 50,711.00

8 Satinitigan, Wilma Resident 50,000.00 House 34,620.00 10,000.00 800.00 2,000.00 47,420.00

9 Satinitigan, Samuel Resident 50,000.00 House 29,495.00 10,000.00 800.00 2,000.00 42,295.00

TOTAL 3.3848 450,000.00 359,012.00 55,966.00 60,000.00 7,200.00 18,000.00 457,883.00

No. NAME OF APS Category

Name of Aps Category

List of APs for Compensation Only

G1 - Main Cultivators/

Resident Only G2 - “Absentee” Land Claimants

Note: see Annex N for samples of signed agreements for

compensation. All compensation agreements are available in the Can-asujan Subproject Office, Carcar, Cebu.

a n n e x G

COMPENSATION ONLY FOR NON RESIDENT CULTIVATOR

A) SUBMERGED AREA

Name of APs Category Size of Plot Structure Compensation Assessed Disturbance Income Total

Value of Crop Compensation Restoration

1 Alcuirez, Bernardo Main-Cultivator 0.0030 1,802.00 10,000.00 11,802.00

2 Alcuirez, Raymundo Main-Cultivator 0.2660 6,989.00 10,000.00 16,989.00

3 Tanudra, Aurelio Main-Cultivator 0.0602 1,863.00 10,000.00 11,863.00

4 Alcuirez, Melchor Main-Cultivator 0.0526 5,876.00 10,000.00 15,876.00

5 Abellanosa, Virgilio Main-Cultivator 0.4167 12,835.00 5,000.00 17,835.00

6 Abellanosa, Felicidad Main-Cultivator 0.4135 2,293.00 5,000.00 7,293.00

7 Castanares, Andres Main-Cultivator 0.2688 5,135.00 5,000.00 10,135.00

8 Larrobis, Cesario Main-Cultivator 0.0393 3,743.00 5,000.00 8,743.00

9 Panes, Ariel Main-Cultivator 0.6470 5,590.00 5,000.00 10,590.00

10 Gaviola, Benita Main-Cultivator 0.2381 21,422.00 5,000.00 26,422.00

11 Cuizon, Olimpia Main-Cultivator 0.0225 3,606.00 10,000.00 13,606.00

12 Quijano, Artemio Main-Cultivator 0.3079 1,460.00 10,000.00 11,460.00

13 Remeticado, Gordiano Main-Cultivator 0.1772 13,696.00 10,000.00 23,696.00

14 Tangaro, Paterno Main-Cultivator 0.2235 18,580.00 10,000.00 28,580.00

15 Teneca, Juliana Main-Cultivator 0.0190 3,340.00 10,000.00 13,340.00

16 Bacus, Lucino Main-Cultivator 0.0110 1,625.00 10,000.00 11,625.00

17 Candado, Wilfredo Main-Cultivator 0.0120 1,060.00 10,000.00 11,060.00

18 Abayata, Zoila Main-Cultivator 0.0070 140.00 5,000.00 5,140.00

19 Sato, Catalino Main-Cultivator 0.0175 14,400.00 10,000.00 24,400.00

20 Mensinades, Rufino Main-Cultivator 0.0784 6,259.00 10,000.00 16,259.00

21 Aledon, Flora Main-Cultivator 0.0070 2,152.00 10,000.00 12,152.00

22 Segismar, Pableo Main-Cultivator 0.0010 150.00 5,000.00 5,150.00

23 Quijano, Rogelio Main-Cultivator 0.0335 1,970.00 10,000.00 11,970.00

24 Abella, Reynaldo Main-Cultivator 0.2060 27,279.00 5,000.00 32,279.00

25 Aledon, Antonio Main-Cultivator 0.1008 2,646.00 5,000.00 7,646.00

26 Arguso, Monica Main-Cultivator 0.1473 9,559.00 5,000.00 14,559.00

27 Baclaan, Celerino Main-Cultivator 0.0225 833.00 5,000.00 5,833.00

28 Canania, Geminigildo Main-Cultivator 0.3519 17,938.00 5,000.00 22,938.00

ANNEX G1

Name of APs Category Size of Plot Structure Compensation Assessed Disturbance Income Total

Value of Crop Compensation Restoration

29 Canania, Teodora Main-Cultivator 0.2682 12,933.00 5,000.00 17,933.00

30 Dayanan, Meriam Main-Cultivator 0.1420 7,227.00 5,000.00 12,227.00

31 Embalsado, Clemente Main-Cultivator 0.2094 3,592.00 5,000.00 8,592.00

32 Isola, Sarah Main-Cultivator 0.0539 8,638.00 5,000.00 13,638.00

33 Quijano, Benigna Main-Cultivator 0.2236 9,881.00 5,000.00 14,881.00

34 Remeticado, Maximo Main-Cultivator 0.3841 10,380.00 5,000.00 15,380.00

35 Rosiana, Sopronio Main-Cultivator 0.1390 11,466.00 5,000.00 16,466.00

36 Sato, Primitiva Main-Cultivator 0.6790 11,743.00 5,000.00 16,743.00

37 Tanudra, Antonio Main-Cultivator 0.0054 840.00 5,000.00 5,840.00

38 Teneca, Eleuterio Main-Cultivator 0.0125 1,939.00 5,000.00 6,939.00

39 Uybobolante, Florentino Main-Cultivator 0.2566 9,366.00 5,000.00 14,366.00

40 Uybobolante, Teodorico Main-Cultivator 0.0576 3,586.00 5,000.00 8,586.00

4l Baclaan, Juan Main-Cultivator 0.0780 9,512.00 10,000.00 19,512.00

42 Aledon, Natividad Main-Cultivator 0.3680 4,944.00 5,000.00 9,944.00

43 Canania, Nestor Main-Cultivator 0.1720 1,138.00 5,000.00 6,138.00

44 Lapasaran, Irenio Main-Cultivator 0.0575 2,191.00 5,000.00 7,191.00

45 Cuizon, Vicente Main-Cultivator cliff 5,180.00 10,000.00 15,180.00

46 Baclaan, Felisa Main-Cultivator 0.0560 3,634.00 5,000.00 8,634.00

47 Tanudra, Flaviano Main-Cultivator 0.0995 5,651.00 5,000.00 10,651.00

48 Alcoseba, Remedios Main-Cultivator 0.2328 3,723.00 5,000.00 8,723.00

49 Tangaro, Constancio Main-Cultivator 0.0927 9,293.00 5,000.00 14,293.00

50 Ochia, Rosendo Main-Cultivator 0.0290 4,853.00 5,000.00 9,853.00

51 Aledon, Primitiva Main-Cultivator cliff Resthouse 10,944.00 465.00 10,000.00 21,409.00

52 Candado, Fernando Main-Cultivator 0.1355 sari-sari store 15,643.00 6,785.00 22,428.00

53 Aledon, Condrado Main-Cultivator 0.0065 1,938.00 10,000.00 11,938.00

54 Abasolo, Hipolito Resident House 53,367.00 10,000.00 800.00 64,167.00

55 Quinez, Pablo Resident House 15,952.00 10,000.00 800.00 26,752.00

56 Soterol, Donato Resident House 13,500.00 10,000.00 800.00 24,300.00

57 Quinez, Leonardo Resident House 1,644.00 10,000.00 800.00 12,444.00

TOTAL 7.9100 111,050.00 345,139.00 395,000.00 3,200.00 854,389.00

B) DAM AREA

Name of APs Category Size of Plot Structure Compensation Assessed Disturbance Total

Value of Crop Compensation

1 Tantog, Roberta Main-Cultivator 3,031.00 5,000.00 8,031.00

2 Gaviola, Catalina Main-Cultivator 0.1484 280.00 5,000.00 5,280.00

3 Gaviola, Beronico Main-Cultivator 98.00 5,000.00 5,098.00

4 Abellanosa, Roberta Main-Cultivator 1.5003 Bodega 19,857.00 8,560.00 10,000.00 38,417.00

5 Cuizon, Arlene Main-Cultivator 0.0780 595.00 5,000.00 5,595.00

6 Tantog, Renario Main-Cultivator 0.2894 6,477.00 5,000.00 11,477.00

7 Lantape, Renato Main-Cultivator 1.2611 31,850.00 10,000.00 41,850.00

TOTAL 3.2772 19,857.00 50,891.00 45,000.00 115,748.00

C) SUBMERGED AND DAM AREA

Name of APs Category Size of Plot Structure Compensation Assessed Disturbance Income Transpo Total

Value of Crop Compensation Restoration Assistance

1 Abasolo, Eugenio Main-Cultivator 1.2128 12,875.00 5,000.00 17,875.00

2 Paner, Rufa Main-Cultivator 0.7102 House 22,306.00 26,011.00 5,000.00 800.00 2,000.00 56,117.00

3 Lantape, Roque Main-Cultivator 2.8349 Bodega 5,859.00 41,929.00 5,000.00 52,788.00

4 Cuizon, Carolina Main-Cultivator 1.2794 6,261.00 5,000.00 11,261.00

5 Satinitigan, Rogelio Main-Cultivator 1.8145 House 54,082.00 14,157.00 5,000.00 800.00 2,000.00 76,039.00

6 Tangaro, Apolonio Main-Cultivator 0.0801 House 40,682.00 2,557.00 5,000.00 800.00 2,000.00 51,039.00

7 Tangaro, Aurea Main-Cultivator 0.3994 House 76,174.00 28,610.00 5,000.00 800.00 2,000.00 112,584.00

TOTAL 7.1185 170,938.00 132,400.00 35,000.00 3,200.00 8,000.00 377,703.00

COMPENSATION FOR CLAIMANTS

A) SUBMERGED AREA

No. Name of Claimant Category Size of Value of Disturbance Total

Plot Land Improvement Compensation1 Balbena, Gayud Claimant 0.0560 1,557.00 5,000.00 6,557.002 Tanginan, Antonio Claimant 1.1531 11,885.00 5,000.00 16,885.003 Bacatan, Luciana Claimant 0.0470 1,465.00 5,000.00 6,465.004 Tanginan, Mamerta Claimant 0.2163 1,830.00 5,000.00 6,830.005 Abella, Alejandra Claimant 0.2227 778.00 5,000.00 5,778.006 Abellanosa, Teofila Claimant 0.1174 5,000.00 5,000.007 Paner, Ronnie Claimant 0.2118 1,276.00 5,000.00 6,276.008 Abellanosa, Anunsasion Claimant 0.2287 1,275.00 5,000.00 6,275.009 Abellanosa, Arcadia Claimant 0.2688 2,200.00 5,000.00 7,200.00

10 Saducas, Natalio Claimant 2.8830 46,795.00 5,000.00 51,795.0011 Lumba, Jacinto Claimant 0.1138 2,263.00 5,000.00 7,263.0012 Alcuirez, Francisco Claimant 0.2253 3,831.00 5,000.00 8,831.0013 Aledon, Jimmy Claimant 0.6536 19,402.00 5,000.00 24,402.0014 Enad, Liberato Claimant 1.1256 50,099.00 5,000.00 55,099.0015 Enad, Victorio Claimant 2.4709 48,336.00 5,000.00 53,336.0016 Abellanosa, Pelagio Claimant 1.1257 31,794.00 31,794.0017 Heirs of Marcela Ramos Claimant 3.1944 68,071.00 5,000.00 73,071.0018 Enad, Solidad Claimant 1.4612 43,754.00 5,000.00 48,754.0019 Llanto, Crispin Claimant 2.2139 16,125.00 5,000.00 21,125.0020 Montesa, Romeo Claimant 2.5711 33,187.00 5,000.00 38,187.0021 Aledon, Raymona Claimant 0.026 556.00 5,000.00 5,556.0022 Aledon, Benigna Claimant cliff 1,524.00 5,000.00 6,524.0023 Candado, Tarcela Claimant 0.1358 6,511.00 5,000.00 11,511.0024 Ochia, Juliet Claimant 0.4318 7,661.00 5,000.00 12,661.0025 Abella, Lucia Claimant 0.5457 7,817.00 5,000.00 12,817.0026 Baclaan, Melchora Claimant 0.0576 1,537.00 5,000.00 6,537.0027 Tangaro, Maxima Claimant 0.2301 11,181.00 5,000.00 16,181.0028 Abellanosa, Venancio Claimant 0.5699 4,338.00 5,000.00 9,338.0029 Enad, Arturo Claimant 0.8842 39,727.00 5,000.00 44,727.0030 Enad, Antonio Claimant 0.0927 3,982.00 5,000.00 8,982.0031 Tanudra, Pantaleon Claimant 0.0995 2,422.00 5,000.00 7,422.0032 Sato, Tanacia Claimant 0.6790 5,032.00 5,000.00 10,032.0033 Teneca, Alejandro Claimant 0.0125 831.00 5,000.00 5,831.0034 Ong, Willy Atty. Claimant 0.0694 1,804.00 5,000.00 6,804.0035 Mensinades, Narciso Claimant 0.0575 939.00 5,000.00 5,939.0036 Tatoy, Melecio Claimant 0.2250 357.00 5,000.00 5,357.0037 Heirs of Juaquin Soronio Claimant 1.7155 14,997.00 5,000.00 19,997.0038 Leon, Sayta Claimant 0.0922 3,660.00 5,000.00 8,660.0039 Pano, Amon Claimant 0.0468 1,254.00 5,000.00 6,254.0040 Quijano , Vicente Claimant 0.3841 3,114.00 5,000.00 8,114.0041 Montesa, Cesar Claimant 0.4042 7,914.00 5,000.00 12,914.0042 Montesa, Paz Claimant 0.0054 1,554.00 5,000.00 6,554.00

TOTAL 27.3252 514,635.00 205,000.00 719,635.00

ANNEX G2

B) DAM AREA

No. Name of Claimant Category Size of Value of Disturbance Total

Plot Land Improvement Compensation

1 Enad, Quilino Claimant 0.1483 1,461.00 5,000.00 6,461.00

2 Cacafranca, Antolin Claimant 2.5786 7,708.00 5,000.00 12,708.00

3 Alesna, Renato Claimant 1.3341 9,855.00 5,000.00 14,855.00

4 Tantog, Mariano Claimant 0.3675 3,461.00 5,000.00 8,461.00

5 Abella, Pascual Claimant 0.3714 3,963.00 5,000.00 8,963.00

6 Tantog, Severina Claimant 0.0909 726.00 5,000.00 5,726.00

7 Tantog, Faustino Claimant 0.2134 10,033.00 5,000.00 15,033.00

8 Satinitigan, Andrea Claimant 0.5571 2,600.00 5,000.00 7,600.00

TOTAL 5.6613 39,807.00 40,000.00 79,807.00

C) SUBMERGED AND DAM AREA

No. Name of Aps Category Size of Value of Disturbance Total Plot Land Compensation

Improvement

1 Tanginan , Apolonio Claimant 2.2785 12,634 5,000.00 17,634.00

2 Tantog , Maria Claimant 0.7044 4,105 5,000.00 9,105.00

3 Reyes , Alfonso Claimant 1.8592 15,621 5,000.00 20,621.00

TOTAL 4.8421 32,360 15,000.00 47,360.00

MOA Between the

“Absentee” Land Claimants and

Resident Only

a n n e x

H

List of Claimants/ Resident Cultivators Who Did Not Reach

Agreement or Sharing

a n n e x I

MASTERLIST OF APs FOR SUBMERGED AND DAM AREA

Number of Total of Size of LIST OF CLAIMANT/ Claimant Name of Tenant Tenant Name ofName of APs Category Location of Plot Plot Plot Plot TENANT NOT SIGNED Share Claimant Signed Share Tenant Signed

1 Alcuirez, Bernardo Main Cultivator Can-asujan 46 1 0.0030 2 Alcuirez, Raymundo Main Cultivator Can-asujan 33 2 0.2660 3 Tanodra, Aurelio Main Cultivator Can-asujan 63 3 0.0602 4 Alcuirez, Melchor Main Cultivator Can-asujan 46A 4 0.0526 5 Abellanosa, Virgilio Main Cultivator Can-asujan 11 5 0.4167 1 21,497.00 Abellanosa, Roberta 10,068.00 Abellanosa, Virgilio6 Abellanosa, Felicidad Main Cultivator Can-asujan 55 6 0.4135 1 Abellanosa, Felicidad7 Castañares, Andres Main Cultivator Can-asujan 13 7 0.2688 2 5,441.00 Abellanosa, Arcadia A. 5,441.00 Castañares, Andres V.8 Larrobis, Cesario Main Cultivator Can-asujan 31 8 0.0393 3 4,191.00 Satinitigan, Maura 2,592.00 Larrobis, Cesario9 Paner, Ariel Main Cultivator Can-asujan 29 9 0.2022

Can-asujan 21 10 0.4348 Can-asujan 50A 11 0.0100

10 Gaviola, Benita Main Cultivator Can-asujan 60 12 0.2381 2 Gaviola, Benita11 Lastima, Cornelio Main Cultivator Can-asujan 30 13 0.0716 12 Alcuirez, Emmanuel Main Cultivator Can-asujan 41 14 0.3393 3 Alcuirez, Emmanuel13 Bornea, Rodelita Main Cultivator Can-asujan 57A 15 0.0290 4 Bornea, Rodelita14 Laurden, Mauro Main Cultivator Can-asujan 62 16 0.0592 5 Laurden, Mauro15 Abasolo, Hipolito Resident Only Can-asujan16 Aledon, Primitiva Main Cultivator Can-asujan cliff 17 - 17 Aledon, Condrado Main Cultivator Calidngan 85 18 0.0065 18 Cuizon, Olimpia Main Cultivator Calidngan 123A 19 0.0225 19 Quijano, Artemio Main Cultivator Calidngan 122 20 0.3079 20 Remeticado, Gordiano Main Cultivator Calidngan 103 21 0.1772 21 Tangaro, Paterno Main Cultivator Calidngan 110 22 0.2235 22 Teneca, Juliana Main Cultivator Calidngan 110B 23 0.0190 23 Bacus, Lucino Main Cultivator Calidngan 125 24 0.0110 24 Candado, Wilfredo Main Cultivator Calidngan 126 25 0.0120 25 Abayata, Zoila Main Cultivator Calidngan 127 26 0.0070 26 Sato, Catalino Main Cultivator Calidngan 70 27 0.0175 27 Mensanades, Rufino Main Cultivator Calidngan 115 28 0.0784 28 Aledon, Flora Main Cultivator Calidngan 75B 29 0.0070 29 Segismar, Pableo Main Cultivator Calidngan 128 30 0.0010 30 Quijano, Rogelio Main Cultivator Calidngan 121A 31 0.0335 31 Abella, Reynaldo Main Cultivator Calidngan 109 32 0.1366 6 Abella, Reynaldo

Calidngan 113 33 0.0694 32 Aledon, Antonio Main Cultivator Calidngan 75 34 0.1008 7 Aledon, Antonio33 Arguso, Monica Main Cultivator Calidngan 102 35 0.1473 8 Arguso, Monica34 Baclaan, Celerino Main Cultivator Calidngan 115 36 0.0225 9 Baclaan, Celerino35 Canania, Geminigildo Main Cultivator Calidngan 64 37 0.2130 10 Canania, Geminigildo

Calidngan 64A 38 0.1389 36 Canania, Teodora Main Cultivator Calidngan 65 39 0.1276

Calidngan 67 40 0.1406 37 Dayanan, Meriam Main Cultivator Calidngan 124 41 0.1420 11 Dayanan, Meriam38 Embalsado, Clemente Calidngan 116 42 0.2094 12 Embalsado, Clemente39 Isola, Sarah Main Cultivator Calidngan 101 43 0.0539 4 7,236.00 Tangaro, Maxima 6,668.00 Isola, Sarah40 Quijano, Benigna Main Cultivator Calidngan 124A 44 0.2236 13 Quijano, Benigna41 Remeticado, Maximo Main Cultivator Calidngan 121 45 0.3841 14 Remeticado, Maximo42 Rosaina, Sufronio Main Cultivator Calidngan 118 46 0.0922 5 6,715.00 Fano, Tomasita R. 13,320.00 Rosiana,Filecidad S.

Page 1 of 7


Calidngan 118A 47 0.0468 6 2,219.00 Lazarte, Melchora S. 4,438.00 Rosiana,Filecidad S.43 Sato, Primitiva Main Cultivator Calidngan 111 48 0.6790 15 Sato, Primitiva44 Tanodra, Antonio Main Cultivator Calidngan 123A 49 0.0054 45 Teneca, Elueterio Main Cultivator Calidngan 112 50 0.0125 16 Teneca, Elueterio46 Uybobolante, FlorentinoMain Cultivator Calidngan 82 51 0.2566 17 Uybobolante, Florentino47 Uybobolante, TeodoricoMain Cultivator Calidngan 99 52 0.0576 7 2,234.00 Lazarte, Melchora B. 5,148.00 Uybobolante, Dulcesima M.48 Baclaan, Juan Main Cultivator Calidngan 103B 53 0.0780 8 5,113.00 Gayud, Custodio 10,226.00 Baclaan, Aurelia49 Aledon, Natividad Main Cultivator Calidngan 81 54 0.3680 18 Aledon, Natividad50 Canania, Nestor Main Cultivator Calidngan 89 55 0.1720 19 Canania, Nestor51 Lapasaran, Ireneo Main Cultivator Calidngan 114 56 0.0575 20 Lapasaran, Ireneo52 Cuizon, Vicente Main Cultivator Calidngan 123 57 cliff 21 Cuizon, Vicente53 Baclaan, Felisa Main Cultivator Calidngan 103A 58 0.0560 22 Baclaan, Felisa54 Tanudra, Flaviano Main Cultivator Calidngan 110A 59 0.0995 23 Tanudra, Flaviano55 Alcoseba, Remedios Main Cultivator Calidngan 117 60 0.2328 24 Alcoseba, Remedios56 Tangaro, Constancio Main Cultivator Calidngan 108 61 0.0927 25 Tangaro, Constancio

Can-asujan 62 cliff57 Ochia, Rosendo Main Cultivator Calidngan 77 63 0.0134 26 Ochia, Rosendo

Calidngan 77A 64 0.0126 Calidngan 776 65 0.0030

58 Tanudra, Anecito Main Cultivator Calidngan 119 66 0.6900 27 Tanudra, AnecitoCalidngan 120 67 0.4323 Calidngan 123 68 0.1406 Calidngan 124B 69 0.0400

59 Candado, Fernando Main Cultivator Calidngan 79 70 0.0887 60 Ochia, Severino Main Cultivator Calidngan 93 71 0.1773 61 Canania, Lorenzo Jr. Main Cultivator Calidngan 90 72 0.1618 28 Canania, Lorenzo Jr.62 Quinez, Pablo Resident Only Calidngan 29 Quinez, Pablo63 Soterol, Donato Resident Only Calidngan 30 Soterol, Donato64 Quinez, Leonardo Resident Only Calidngan 31 Quinez, Leonardo65 Macaron, Diosdado Main Cultivator Can-asujan 43 73 0.1466 32 Macaron, Diosdado

Can-asujan 44 74 0.0964Can-asujan 48 75 0.1082Can-asujan 22 - A 76 cliff

66 Candado, Mariolito Main Cultivator Calidngan 96 77 0.2987 33 Candado, Mariolito67 Aledon, Danilo Main Cultivator Calidngan 81-A 78 0.2325 34 Aledon, Danilo68 Racoma, Teodorico Main Cultivator Can-asujan 58 79 0.0798 35 Racoma, Teodorico69 Larrobis, Evaristo Main Cultivator Can-asujan 57 80 0.0990 36 Larrobis, Evaristo70 Canoy, Bonifacio Main Cultivator Can-asujan 37 81 0.0792 37 Canoy, Bonifacio

Can-asujan 25 82 0.0776Can-asujan 28 83 0.0936Can-asujan 27 84 0.2429

71 Tangaro, Severa Main Cultivator Can-asujan 7 85 0.4229 9 26283 Reyes, Jesus N. 20,543.00 Tangaro, Severa L.72 Canania, Roberto Main Cultivator Calidngan 68 86 0.2535 38 Canania, Roberto73 Ochia, Leonardo Main Cultivator Calidngan 94 87 0.4318 39 Ochia, Leonardo74 Alcuirez, Agustin Main Cultivator Can-asujan 23 88 0.0296 10 6,836.00 Saducas, Natalio S. 13,672.00 Alcuirez Sinona T.

Can-asujan 39 89 0.1704 0 Saducas , Natalio S.75 Pahayahay, Felicisimo Main Cultivator Can-asujan 45 90 0.5572 40 Pahayahay, Felicisimo

Can-asujan 49 91 0.9031Can-asujan 59 92 0.2513

Page 2 of 7


76 Larrobis, Serapio Main Cultivator Can-asujan 56 93 0.3880 41 Larrobis, Serapio77 Abellanosa, Sergio Main Cultivator Can-asujan 54 94 0.4085 42 Abellanosa, Sergio78 Alcuirez, Juanito Main Cultivator Can-asujan 38 95 0.4052 43 Alcuirez, Juanito79 Abellana, Maximina Main Cultivator Calidngan 105 96 0.7327 44 Abellana, Maximina80 Alcuirez, Guillermo Main Cultivator Can-asujan 16 97 0.1138 11 3,924.00 Aledon, Columba 7,848.00 Alcuirez, Guillermo81 Soterol, Anastacio Main Cultivator Calidngan 87 98 0.1142 12 4,111.00 Enad, Liberato 1,632.00 Soterol, Anastacio

Calidngan 97 99 0.7163 13 57,164.00 Enad, Bernardo S. 17,178.00 Soterol, AnastacioCalidngan 100 100 0.0289

82 Aledon, Silvino JR. Main Cultivator Can-asujan 32 101 0.0070 45 Aledon, Silvino JR.Can-asujan 61 102 0.2407

83 Abellana, Bernardo Main Cultivator Calidngan 107 103 0.0453 14 10,000.00 Abellanosa, Venancio 15,391.00 Abellana, BernardoCalidngan 104 104 0.5699

84 Aledon, Teodorico Main Cultivator Calidngan 75-A 105 0.0150 46 Aledon, TeodoricoCalidngan 83 106 0.4867

85 Alcuirez, Tomas Main Cultivator Can-asujan 42 107 0.0352 47 Alcuirez, TomasCan-asujan 9 108 0.1788Can-asujan 10 109 0.2118Can-asujan 15 110 0.0649Can-asujan 36 111 0.0375

86 Aledon, Constancio Main Cultivator Can-asujan 76 112 1.2273 48 Aledon, Constancio87 Tumulak, Leopoldo Main Cultivator Can-asujan 47 113 1.0512

Calidngan 86 114 0.3118Calidngan 98 115 0.1728 15 6,828.00 Espinosa, Rosenda 13,656.00 Tumulak, Leopoldo

88 Gaviola, Eugenio Main Cultivator Can-asujan 50 116 0.3059 49 Gaviola, EugenioCan-asujan 51 117 0.0403Can-asujan 53 118 0.247

89 Nadela Ponciano SR. Main Cultivator Calidngan 72 119 1.0324 50 Nadela Ponciano SR.Calidngan 71-A 120 0.0380Can-asujan dam 17 0.4372Can-asujan 18 121 0.0359

90 Canania, Gloria Main Cultivator Calidngan 66 122 0.2884 51 Canania, GloriaCalidngan 68-A 123 0.0590Calidngan 69 124 0.0473

91 Nadela, Martiniano Main Cultivator Calidngan 73 125 0.7010 52 Nadela, Martiniano92 Abellanosa, Pelagio Main Cultivator Calidngan 84 126 0.8620 16 42,826.00. Enad, Bernardo S. 47,692.00 Abellanosa, Pelagio T.

Calidngan 75-D 127 0.009093 Canania, Jaime Main Cultivator Calidngan 91 128 0.1577 53 Canania, Jaime94 Larrobis, Gerardo Main Cultivator Can-asujan 52 129 0.1140 54 Larrobis, Gerardo95 Mangyao, Emmanuel Main Cultivator Calidngan 88 130 0.4531 55 Mangyao, Emmanuel96 Nadela, Ponciano JR. Main Cultivator Calidngan 71 131 0.3417 56 Nadela, Ponciano JR.97 Ochia, Ignacio Main Cultivator Calidngan 74 132 0.0201

Calidngan 95 133 0.5457 17 27,705.00 Abella, Lucia 13,106.00 Ochia, Ignacio98 Candado, Reynaldo Main Cultivator Calidngan 85 134 0.1176 57 Candado, Reynaldo

Calidngan 78 135 0.135899 Canania, Lorenzo SR. Main Cultivator Calidngan 92 136 0.0650 58 Canania, Lorenzo SR.

100 Guingona, Mario Main Cultivator Calidngan 106 137 0.1062 59 Guingona, Mario101 Ricarte, Lorna Main Cultivator Can-asujan 34 138 0.1879 60 Ricarte, Lorna102 Gaviola, Rodrigo Main Cultivator Can-asujan 20 139 0.0725 61 Gaviola, Rodrigo

Can-asujan 22 140 0.0263

Page 3 of 7


103 Amigo, Agosto Main Cultivator Can-asujan 40 141 0.2346 62 Amigo, Agosto104 Tanodra, Natividad Resident Only Can-asujan 63 Tanodra, Natividad105 Ricarte, Eutiquio Resident Only Can-asujan 64 Ricarte, Eutiquio106 Tantog, Roberta Main Cultivator Can-asujan Dam1 0.1484 65 Tantog, Roberta107 Gaviola, Catalina Main Cultivator Can-asujan 66 Gaviola, Catalina108 Gaviola, Beronico Main Cultivator Can-asujan 67 Gaviola, Beronico109 Satinitigan, Maura Main Cultivator Can-asujan Dam2 1.0501 18 13,950.00 Cacafranca, Antolin Jr. 12,393.00 Satinitigan, Maura110 Abellanosa, Roberta Main Cultivator Can-asujan Dam3 1.5003 68 Abellanosa, Roberta111 Cuizon, Arlene Main Cultivator Can-asujan Dam4 0.2780 19 392.00 Alesna, Renato R. 784.00 Cuizon, Arlene A.112 Tantog, Renario Main Cultivator Can-asujan Dam7 0.2894 20 9,756.00 Tantog, Mariano 6,174.00 Tantog, Efrena113 Lantape, Claudio Sr. Main Cultivator Can-asujan Dam8 1.2561 21 35,602.00 Renato R. Alesna 23,302.00 Lantape Claudio Sr.114 Tantog, Marcela Main Cultivator Can-asujan Dam9 0.5382 69 Tantog, Marcela115 Castañares, Eugenio Main Cultivator Can-asujan Dam10 0.3714 22 13,389.00 Marfil, Odessa A. 7,436.00 Castañares, Eugenio P.116 Satinitigan, Wilma Resident Only Can-asujan 70 Satinitigan, Wilma117 Satinitigan, Samuel Resident Only Can-asujan 71 Satinitigan, Samuel118 Lantape, Claudio Jr. Main Cultivator Can-asujan Dam11 0.0909 23 2,681.00 Lantape, Claudio Sr. 319.00 Lantape, Claudio Jr.119 Marfil, Apolinario Main Cultivator Can-asujan Dam12 0.0781 24 1142 Tantog, Mariano 1,142.00 Marfil, Apolinaria T.120 Lantape, Renato Main Cultivator Can-asujan Dam13 1.2611 25 45,598.00 Lantape,Nenette 9,402.00 Lapinid, Feliciana121 Paner, Hilario Resident Only122 Paner, Rufa Main Cultivator Can-asujan 17 0.1531 26 6,077.90 Satinitigan, Andrea 9,955.00 Paner, Rufa

Can-asujan 17 0.1531 27 36,507.00 Paner, Rufa 10,258.00 Alcuirez, TomasCan-asujan dam 16 0.5571 0 Satinitgan, Andrea

123 Lantape, Roque Main Cultivator Can-asujan 1 142 1.1513 28 41,062.00 Bacatan, Luciana T. 37,327.00 Lantape, Roque S.Can-asujan dam 6 1.6836 0

124 Cuizon, Carolina Main Cultivator Can-asujan 4 143 0.2227 29 6,788.00 Abellanosa, Teofila A. 4,320.00 Cuizon, Carolina A.Can-asujan 3 144 0.1174 Can-asujan dam 5 1.0567

125 Satinitigan, Rogelio Main Cultivator Can-asujan 2 145 0.0470 Can-asujan 5 146 0.0103 30 5,490.00 Tanginan, John N. 5,490.00 Satinitigan, Rogelio A.Can-asujan 12 147 0.2287 Can-asujan dam 15 1.5285 31 6,830.00 Cacafranca, Antolin Jr. 8,387.00 Satinitigan, Rogelio

126 Tangaro, Apolonio Main Cultivator Can-asujan 35 148 0.0801 32 1,990.00 Saducas, Natalio S. 3,980.00 Tangaro, Josefina S.127 Tangaro, Aurea Main Cultivator Can-asujan 19 149 0.1860 72 Tangaro, Aurea

Can-asujan dam 14 0.2134 128 Abasolo, Eugenio Main Cultivator Can-asujan 8 150 0.6794 33 6,080.00 Saducas, Natalio S. 12,160.00 Abasolo, Eugenio

Can-asujan 6 151 0.1662 Can-asujan 24 152 0.1679 34 1,484.00 Bacatan, Luciana T. 1,484.00 Abasolo, Eugenio A.Can-asujan dam 18 0.1993

129 Enad, Quilino Co - Cultivator Can-asujan dam 1 * 0.1483 73 Enad, Quilino130 Cacafranca, Antolin Co - Cultivator Can-asujan dam 2 * 1.0501

Can-asujan dam 15 1.5285 131 Alesna, Renato Co - Cultivator Can-asujan dam 4 * 0.2780

Can-asujan dam 8 1.2561 132 Tantog, Mariano Co - Cultivator Can-asujan dam 7 * 0.2894 74 Tantog, Mariano

Can-asujan dam 12 0.0781 133 Tantog, Maura Co - Cultivator Can-asujan dam 9 * 0.5382 75 Tantog, Maura134 Abella, Pascual Co - Cultivator Can-asujan dam 10 * 0.3714 76 Abella, Pascual135 Tantog, Severina Co - Cultivator Can-asujan dam 11 * 0.0909 77 Tantog, Severina136 Tantog, Faustino Co - Cultivator Can-asujan dam 14 * 0.2134 78 Tantog, Faustino

Page 4 of 7


137 Satinitigan, Andrea Co - Cultivator Can-asujan dam 16 * 0.5571 79 Satinitigan, Andrea138 Tanginan, Antonio Co - Cultivator Can-asujan 1 * 1.1531 80 Tanginan, Antonio139 Bacatan, Luciana Co - Cultivator Can-asujan 2 * 0.0470 140 Tanginan, Apolonio Co - Cultivator Can-asujan 5 * 0.0103

Can-asujan 11 * 0.4167 Can-asujan dam6 * 1.6836 Can-asujan 14 * 0.1679

141 Tanginan, Mamerta Co - Cultivator Can-asujan 19 * 0.1788 81 Tanginan, MamertaCan-asujan 36 * 0.0375

142 Abella, Alejandra Co - Cultivator Can-asujan 3 * 0.2227 82 Abella, Alejandra143 Abellanosa, Teofila Co - Cultivator Can-asujan 4 * 0.1174 83 Abellanosa, Teofila144 Tantog, Maria Co - Cultivator Can-asujan 6 * 0.1662 84 Tantog, Maria145 Reyes, Alfonso Co - Cultivator Can-asujan 7 * 0.4229 85 Reyes, Alfonso146 Paner, Ronnie Co - Cultivator Can-asujan 10 * 0.2118 86 Paner, Ronnie147 Abellanosa, Anunsasion Co - Cultivator Can-asujan 12 * 0.2287 87 Abellanosa, Anunsasion148 Abellanosa, Arcadia Co - Cultivator Can-asujan 13 * 0.2688 88 Abellanosa, Arcadia149 Saducas, Natalio Co - Cultivator Can-asujan 15 * 0.0649 35 3,472.00 Saducas, Natalio 6,944.00 Alcuirez, Tomas

Can-asujan 23 * 0.0296 0 Saducas, Natalio 0 Alcuirez, TomasCan-asujan 39 * 0.1704 0 Saducas, Natalio 0 Alcuirez, TomasCan-asujan 24 * 0.1691 Can-asujan 29 * 0.2022 36 4,356.00 Saducas, Natalio 8,712.00 Paner, Guillerma A.Can-asujan 26 * 0.5064 Can-asujan 27 * 0.2429 Can-asujan 28 * 0.0936 Can-asujan 25 * 0.0776 Can-asujan 34 * 0.1879 Can-asujan 35 * 0.0801 Can-asujan 37 * 0.0792 Can-asujan 38 * 0.4052 Can-asujan 40 * 0.2346 Can-asujan 41 * 0.3393

150 Lumba, Jacinto Co - Cultivator Can-asujan 16 * 0.1138 89 Lumba, Jacinto151 Alcuirez, Francisco Co - Cultivator Can-asujan 19 * 0.1860 90 Alcuirez, Francisco

Can-asujan 31 * 0.0393 152 Aledon, Jimmy Co - Cultivator Can-asujan 45 * 0.5572 91 Aledon, Jimmy

Can-asujan 44 * 0.0964 153 Enad, Liberato Co - Cultivator Calidngan 87 * 0.1142

Can-asujan 48 * 0.1082 Can-asujan 49 * 0.9031

154 Abellanosa, Pelagio Co - Cultivator Can-asujan 50 * 0.3059 Can-asujan 51 * 0.0403 Can-asujan 53 * 0.2470 Can-asujan 50A * 0.0100 Can-asujan 52 * 0.1140 Can-asujan 54 * 0.4085

155 Heirs of Marcela Ramos Co - Cultivator Can-asujan 55 * 0.4135 92 Heirs of Marcela RamosCan-asujan 56 * 0.3880 Can-asujan 57 * 0.0990 Can-asujan 57A * 0.0290

Page 5 of 7


Can-asujan 58 * 0.0798 Calidngan 64 * 0.2130 Calidngan 65 * 0.1276 Calidngan 66 * 0.2884 Calidngan 68A * 0.0590 Calidngan 69 * 0.0473 Calidngan 67 * 0.1406 Calidngan 68 * 0.2535 Calidngan 85 * 0.1111 Calidngan 88 * 0.4531 Calidngan 89 * 0.1720 Calidngan 90 * 0.1618 Calidngan 91 * 0.1577

156 Enad, Solidad Co - Cultivator Can-asujan 59 * 0.2513 93 Enad, SolidadCan-asujan 60 * 0.2381 Can-asujan 62 * 0.5922 Can-asujan 61 * 0.2407 Calidngan 64A * 0.1389

157 Llanto, Crispin Co - Cultivator Calidngan 71 * 0.3417 94 Llanto, CrispinCalidngan 72 * 1.0324 Calidngan 71A * 0.0380 Calidngan 73 * 0.7010 Calidngan 75 * 0.1008

158 Montesa, Romeo Co - Cultivator Calidngan 76 * 1.2273 95 Montesa, RomeoCalidngan 81 * 0.3680 Calidngan 81A * 0.2325 Calidngan 82 * 0.2566 Calidngan 83 * 0.4867

159 Aledon, Raymona Co - Cultivator Calidngan 77 * 0.0260 96 Aledon, Raymona160 Aledon, Benigna Co - Cultivator Calidngan 77A cliff 97 Aledon, Benigna161 Candado, Tarcela Co - Cultivator Calidngan 78 * 0.1358 37 6,839.00 Candado, Tarcela T. 8,078.00 Candado, Reynaldo T.162 Enad, Victorio Co - Cultivator Can-asujan 43 * 0.1466

Calidngan 79 * 0.0887 Can-asujan 8 * 0.0468 Calidngan 84 * 0.8620 Calidngan 86 * 0.3118 38 14,498.00 Enad, Bernardo S. 20,644.00 Tumulak, Leopoldo T.Calidngan 96 * 0.2987 39 18,068.00 Enad, Liberat S. 7,562.00 Candado, Mariolito R.Calidngan 97 * 0.7163

163 Ochia, Juliet Co - Cultivator Calidngan 94 * 0.4318 40 20,340.00 Ochia, Julieta L. 19,172.00 Ochea, Leonardo S.164 Abella, Lucia Co - Cultivator Calidngan 95 * 0.5457 98 Abella, Lucia165 Baclaan, Melchora Co - Cultivator Calidngan 99 * 0.0576 99 Baclaan, Melchora166 Tangaro, Maxima Co - Cultivator Calidngan 100 * 0.0289

Calidngan 101 * 0.0539 Calidngan 102 * 0.1473 41 9,836.00 Tangaro, Maxima 15,712.00 Arguso, Monica

167 Baclaan, Felisa Co - Cultivator Calidngan 103A * 0.0560 100 Baclaan, Felisa168 Abellanosa, Venancio Co - Cultivator Calidngan 104 * 0.5699 101 Abellanosa, Venancio169 Enad, Arturo Co - Cultivator Calidngan 105 * 0.7327 102 Enad, Arturo

Calidngan 106 * 0.1062 Calidngan 107 * 0.0453

Page 6 of 7


170 Enad, Antonio Co - Cultivator Calidngan 108 * 0.0927 103 Enad, Antonio171 Tanudra, Pantaleon Co - Cultivator Calidngan 110A * 0.0995 104 Tanudra, Pantaleon172 Sato, Tanacia Co - Cultivator Calidngan 111 * 0.6790 105 Sato, Tanacia173 Teneca, Alejandro Co - Cultivator Calidngan 112 * 0.0125 106 Teneca, Alejandro174 Ong, Willy Atty. Co - Cultivator Calidngan 113 * 0.0694 107 Ong, Willy Atty.175 Mensinades, Narciso Co - Cultivator Calidngan 114 * 0.0575 108 Mensinades, Narciso176 Tatoy, Melecio Co - Cultivator Calidngan 115A * 0.2250 109 Tatoy, Melecio177 Heirs of Juaquin SoronioCo - Cultivator Calidngan 116 * 0.2094 110 Heirs of Juaquin Soronio

Calidngan 117 * 0.2328 Calidngan 119 * 0.6990 Calidngan 120 * 0.4323 Calidngan 124 * 0.1420

178 Sayta. Leon Co - Cultivator Calidngan *118 * 0.0922 111 Sayta. Leon179 Pano, Amon Co - Cultivator Calidngan 118A * 0.0468 112 Pano, Amon180 Quijano, Vicente Co - Cultivator Calidngan 121 * 0.3841 113 Quijano, Vicente181 Montesa, Cesar Co - Cultivator Calidngan 123 * 0.1406 114 Montesa, Cesar

Calidngan 124B * 0.0400 Calidngan 124A * 0.2236

182 Montesa, Paz Co - Cultivator Calidngan 123A * 0.0054 115 Montesa, Paz183 Nadela, Simfruso Co - Cultivator Calidngan 123C *

TOTAL 152 80.8797 509724.90 449756.00

Page 7 of 7

List of APs in the Service Area Whose Land

is Subject of Expropriation

a n n e x J

List of APs in the Service Area (Rice & Vege) affected by ROW Acquisition for Expropriation

ROW Acquisition Estimated Cost of Land Total Cost ofName of AP Requirement for Compensation Land for

Lot Nos Area (sq.m.) P/sq.m. Compensation

A. Rice Area1 Catalina Lucero 1341 17,260.00 104.00 105.00 10,920.00

1342 19,677.00 74.00 105.00 7,770.00 4058 2,500.00 28.00 275.00 7,700.00

2 Heirs of Felimon Mercado 1146 36,323.00 27.00 30.00 810.00 1163part 49,566.00 155.00 150.00 23,250.00

3 Heirs of Corazon Gutierrez 1165 9,876.00 84.00 105.00 8,820.00 1167 5,549.00 44.56 30.00 1,336.80

4 Heirs of Glicerio Sarmiento 5783part 47,359.00 309.00 30.00 9,270.00 5 Eduardo/Mila Cavan 2408 7,367.00 257.00 105.00 26,985.00 6 Leto Sato 4032 19,818.00 228.00 15.00 3,420.00 7 Bienvenido Genon 2410 1,589.00 31.00 30.00 930.00 8 Ferdinand/Imelda Tiu 683-C 4,401.00 47.60 15.00 714.00 9 Faustina Gemal 1162 3,973.00 95.00 30.00 2,850.00

10 Crispin Baylon 5739 50,989.00 160.00 15.00 2,400.00 Subtotal 276,247.00 1,644.16 107,175.80

B. Vegetable Area1 Crispin Baylon 5739 50,989.00 38.50 15.00 577.50

3324-30 15,522.00 147.00 15.00 2,205.00 3321 2,706.00 126.00 15.00 1,890.00

2 Duyanon, Aida 3216-U-9 757.00 3 Duyanon, Concepcion 3216-U-8 757.00 4 Duyanon, Gregorio 3216-U-7 757.00 5 Duyanon, Juan 3216-U-6 757.00 6 Duyanon, Eusebio 3216-U-5 757.00 238.10 15.00 3,571.50 7 Duyanon, Adela 3216-U-4 757.00 8 Duyanon, Lucia 3216-U-3 757.00 9 Duyanon, Eugenio 3216-U-2 757.00

10 Duyanon, Elvira 3216-U-1 757.00 11 Eugenia Genovia 3216-R 3,498.00 85.20 15.00 1,278.00 12 Gregorio Nuñez 3324-14 4,348.00 123.00 15.00 1,845.00 13 Teofila Nadela 3324-33 7,633.00 31.50 15.00 472.50 14 Victor Navaja 3,043.00 30.10 15.00 451.50 15 Baltazar Satinitigan 5728-E 10,584.00 24.60 15.00 369.00 16 Eugenio Satinitigan 5717-70 1,920.00 57.50 15.00 862.50 17 Petronila Satorre 3324P462 2,520.00 6.30 15.00 94.50

3324-35 14,451.00 23.80 15.00 357.00 18 Rafael Tanginan 3324-43 2,507.00 11.20 15.00 168.00 19 Glen Canaya 3325-C prt 17,700.00 133.00 30.00 3,990.00

3325-A-prt 285.00 20 Prescila Codo 3164-A-5-D 152.00 20.90 300.00 6,270.00 21 Elpedia dela Cerna 1545-A-4 2,796.00 106.30 250.00 26,575.00

3124-A 674.00 58.30 300.00 17,490.00 22 Sunny Lapiña 5717-24 4,519.00 82.20 15.00 1,233.00 23 Natividad Oroc 3125-A-9-A 1,140.00 22.80 300.00 6,840.00 24 Conchita Pintakasi 3125-A-9-B 4,190.00 104.10

25 Perfecta Cabanete

old abandoned road 123.80 7.00 866.60

26 Rita Manayaga 2353-C-88 5,843.00 28.00 7.00 196.00 27 Romeo Andales 1906-P 259.90 55.00 14,294.50

1969 105.00 55.00 5,775.00 28 Pedro Lapas 2353-C-87 2,627.00 14.70 7.00 102.90 29 A.C. Steel 74.80 42.50 3,179.00 30 Marcelo Villordon 85.80 85.00 7,293.00

Subtotal 166,460.00 2,162.40 108,247.00

Grand Total 442,707.00 3,806.56 215,422.80

Total Lanholding (sq.m.)

Information Booklet Prototype on the Can-asujan LARP

a n n e x

K

List of Meetings and Consultations with PAF/Ps

a n n e x L

TOR for the Engagement of the External Evaluation Agency

a n n e x

M

Samples of Signed Agreements for Different Areas

a n n e x N

CANAL RIGHT-OF-WAY AGREEMENT

EASEMENT FOR UNDERGROUND AQUEDUCT

INTEGRATED CARCAR RICE IRRIGATORS’ ASSOCIATION, INC. (ICRIA)

PIPELINE RIGHT-OF-WAY AGREEMENT

CARCAR UNITED LOWLAND FARMERS’ IRRIGATOR’S ASSOCIATION

MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT (Resettlement)

resettlement planning document › ... › 76636 › 27245-phi-larp.pdf · resettlement planning...

Documents