retratamiento con anti-egfr: ¿debe ser guiado por la ...€¦ · rl foro debate oncología 2019....

19
Retratamiento con anti-EGFR: ¿debe ser guiado por la biopsia lquida? Dr. Rafael López López Oncología Médica Traslacional Hospital Clínico Universitario e Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Santiago de Compostela

Upload: others

Post on 28-Jul-2020

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Retratamiento con anti-EGFR: ¿debe ser guiado por la ...€¦ · RL Foro debate oncología 2019. RL Foro debate oncología 2019 10:48 Khanet al., ancerDiscov, 2018 ThePROSPECT-C

Retratamiento con anti-EGFR: ¿debe ser guiado por la biopsia liquida?

Dr. Rafael López LópezOncología Médica Traslacional

Hospital Clínico Universitario e Instituto de Investigación SanitariaSantiago de Compostela

Page 2: Retratamiento con anti-EGFR: ¿debe ser guiado por la ...€¦ · RL Foro debate oncología 2019. RL Foro debate oncología 2019 10:48 Khanet al., ancerDiscov, 2018 ThePROSPECT-C

10:48RL Foro debate oncología 2019

Disclosures

Advisory role: Roche, AstraZeneca, Merck, MSD, Bayer, BMS, Novartis, Janssen, Lilly, Pfizer, Leo

Speaker’s fee: Roche, Novartis, Pharmamar

Research support: Roche, Merck

Co-founder and shareholder: Nasasbiotech, S.L., Mtrap Inc

Page 3: Retratamiento con anti-EGFR: ¿debe ser guiado por la ...€¦ · RL Foro debate oncología 2019. RL Foro debate oncología 2019 10:48 Khanet al., ancerDiscov, 2018 ThePROSPECT-C

10:48

Retratamiento con anti-EGFR: ¿debe ser guiado por la biopsia liquida?

RL Foro debate oncologia 2019

….Sí…claro

Page 4: Retratamiento con anti-EGFR: ¿debe ser guiado por la ...€¦ · RL Foro debate oncología 2019. RL Foro debate oncología 2019 10:48 Khanet al., ancerDiscov, 2018 ThePROSPECT-C

10:48

Anti-EGFR rechallenge strategy

Goldberg et al., ESMO Open 2018. doi:10.1136/ esmoopen-2018-000353

RECHALLENGE: Reintroduction, after an intervening treatment, of the same therapy to which tumour has already proved to be resistant

RL Foro debate oncologia 2019

Page 5: Retratamiento con anti-EGFR: ¿debe ser guiado por la ...€¦ · RL Foro debate oncología 2019. RL Foro debate oncología 2019 10:48 Khanet al., ancerDiscov, 2018 ThePROSPECT-C

10:48

How to resolve these problem?

RL Foro debate oncologia 2019

Continously monitoring de cancer cells

Page 6: Retratamiento con anti-EGFR: ¿debe ser guiado por la ...€¦ · RL Foro debate oncología 2019. RL Foro debate oncología 2019 10:48 Khanet al., ancerDiscov, 2018 ThePROSPECT-C

10:48

From the practical point of view

RL Foro debate oncologia 2019

1 2-5

1-3 2-7

2-7

2-3

2-5

3-15 1-5

1-7

1 5 (3-15) 1-7

1

14-48 days

7-14 days

1.500€-30.000€ (one)

300€-3.000€(one)

Page 7: Retratamiento con anti-EGFR: ¿debe ser guiado por la ...€¦ · RL Foro debate oncología 2019. RL Foro debate oncología 2019 10:48 Khanet al., ancerDiscov, 2018 ThePROSPECT-C

10:48

Clonal evolution of CRC

Siravenga et al., Nature Rev 2017

RL Foro debate oncologia 2019

From the scientific point of view

Page 8: Retratamiento con anti-EGFR: ¿debe ser guiado por la ...€¦ · RL Foro debate oncología 2019. RL Foro debate oncología 2019 10:48 Khanet al., ancerDiscov, 2018 ThePROSPECT-C

10:48

Plasma ctDNA RAS mutation analysis for the diagnosis and treatment monitoring of metastatic colorectal cancer patients

Emergence of RAS mutations at progression to anti-EGFR treatmentBaseline

PD

Vidal et al., Annals of Oncology, 2017

RL Foro debate oncologia 2019

Page 9: Retratamiento con anti-EGFR: ¿debe ser guiado por la ...€¦ · RL Foro debate oncología 2019. RL Foro debate oncología 2019 10:48 Khanet al., ancerDiscov, 2018 ThePROSPECT-C

10:48Van Emburgh. Nat Comm 2016

Emergence of mutations of resistance in mCRC patients with anti-EGFR

Dienstmann et al., Ann Oncol , 2016

RL Foro debate oncología 2019

Resistance to anti-EGFR mAbs

Page 10: Retratamiento con anti-EGFR: ¿debe ser guiado por la ...€¦ · RL Foro debate oncología 2019. RL Foro debate oncología 2019 10:48 Khanet al., ancerDiscov, 2018 ThePROSPECT-C

10:48

Retreatment with anti-EGFR based therapies in metastatic colorectal cancer:

impact of intervening time interval and prior anti-EGFR response

Liu et al. BMC Cancer 2015;15:713; Goldberg et al., ESMO Open 2018.

RL Foro debate oncologia 2019

Page 11: Retratamiento con anti-EGFR: ¿debe ser guiado por la ...€¦ · RL Foro debate oncología 2019. RL Foro debate oncología 2019 10:48 Khanet al., ancerDiscov, 2018 ThePROSPECT-C

10:48RL Foro debate oncologia 2019

Page 12: Retratamiento con anti-EGFR: ¿debe ser guiado por la ...€¦ · RL Foro debate oncología 2019. RL Foro debate oncología 2019 10:48 Khanet al., ancerDiscov, 2018 ThePROSPECT-C

10:48

INCLUSION CRITERIAHistologically confirmed diagnosis of metastatic colorectal cancer;Documented WT RAS exons 2, 3 and 4 (KRas and NRas) and WT BRAF V600E;Complete or partial response to frontline chemotherapy including anti-EGFR mAb.Imaging documented progression while on therapy or maintenance regimen including anti-EGFR mAb;RAS-extended mutational load with > 3% fractional abundance, measured on plasma ctDNA at BML (maximum within 2 weeks of last anti EGFR administration);Planned 2nd line chemotherapy of any type with the exclusion of further anti EGFRs (regorafenib is allowed).

Rechallenge With Panitumumab Driven by RAS

Dynamic of Resistance (CHRONOS)

RL Foro debate oncologia 2019

Page 13: Retratamiento con anti-EGFR: ¿debe ser guiado por la ...€¦ · RL Foro debate oncología 2019. RL Foro debate oncología 2019 10:48 Khanet al., ancerDiscov, 2018 ThePROSPECT-C

10:48RL Foro debate oncologia 2019

Khan et al., Cancer Discov, 2018

The PROSPECT-C trial

Page 14: Retratamiento con anti-EGFR: ¿debe ser guiado por la ...€¦ · RL Foro debate oncología 2019. RL Foro debate oncología 2019 10:48 Khanet al., ancerDiscov, 2018 ThePROSPECT-C

10:48

Longitudinal Liquid Biopsy and Mathematical Modeling of Clonal Evolution Forecast Time to Treatment Failure in the

PROSPECT-C Phase II Colorectal Cancer Clinical Trial

Khan et al., Cancer Discov, 2018

RL Foro debate oncologia 2019

Page 15: Retratamiento con anti-EGFR: ¿debe ser guiado por la ...€¦ · RL Foro debate oncología 2019. RL Foro debate oncología 2019 10:48 Khanet al., ancerDiscov, 2018 ThePROSPECT-C

10:48RL Foro debate oncologia 2019

Cremolini C et al. JAMA Oncol. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.5080

The CRICKET trial (a proof-of-concept study)

A, Hazard ratio, 0.44 (95%CI, 0.18-0.98; P = .03). B, Hazard ratio, 0.58 (95% CI, 0.22-1.52; P = .24).

Page 16: Retratamiento con anti-EGFR: ¿debe ser guiado por la ...€¦ · RL Foro debate oncología 2019. RL Foro debate oncología 2019 10:48 Khanet al., ancerDiscov, 2018 ThePROSPECT-C

10:48RL Foro debate oncología 2019

Page 17: Retratamiento con anti-EGFR: ¿debe ser guiado por la ...€¦ · RL Foro debate oncología 2019. RL Foro debate oncología 2019 10:48 Khanet al., ancerDiscov, 2018 ThePROSPECT-C

10:48

Take Home Message

• Rechallenge with anti-EGFR provides clinical benefit in molecularlyselected mCRC patients beyond second line.

• ctDNA analyses to determine RAS and other genes status will be a key element to guide rechallenge in CRC patients

• Ongoing clinical trials will solidify the concept of anti-EGFR rechallenge as a routine strategy to optimise the therapy

• Additional biomarkers of response to anti-EGFR agents will ensuredefinition of the optimal patient populations for these strategies

RL Foro debate oncologia 2019

Page 18: Retratamiento con anti-EGFR: ¿debe ser guiado por la ...€¦ · RL Foro debate oncología 2019. RL Foro debate oncología 2019 10:48 Khanet al., ancerDiscov, 2018 ThePROSPECT-C

10:48

Future

RL Foro debate oncología 2019

Heitzer et al Nat Rew Genetics 2018 doi.org/10.1038/s41576-018-0071-5