boe district performance review 2017-18final · 2019-05-18 · district performance review jeffco...

DistrictPerformanceReview

JeffcoBoardofEducationSeptember7,2017

3rd Grade 4th Grade 5th Grade 6th Grade 7th Grade 8th Grade 9th GradeColorado 40 44 46 40 44 43 36Jeffco 45 52 52 52 51 51 44

0

20

40

60

80

100

Per

cent

Met

/Exc

eede

d E

xpec

tatio

ns

2016-17 Jeffco/ColoradoCMAS English Language Arts (ELA)

Achievement Comparison Percent Met/Exceeded

1

3rd Grade 4th Grade 5th Grade 6th Grade 7th Grade 8th Grade 9th Grade2015-2016 42 50 47 50 48 46 432016-2017 45 52 52 52 51 51 44

0

20

40

60

80

100

Per

cent

Met

/Exc

eede

d E

xpec

tatio

nsJeffco 2-Year Trend

CMAS ELA Achievement Percent Met/Exceeded

2

Jeffco CMAS Growth by SubgroupEnglish Language Arts

2016-17 Median Growth Percentile

3

EarlyLiteracy

Strengthsfrom2016-17:• AdditionalLiteracySupportforCOREandIntervention acrossthesystem:

○ LiteracyInterventionists, JSEL,LucyCalkinsReadingUnitsofStudy,iCALI,layeredcenters,DiscoveryReading/Writing/Thinking

○ ContentSpecialistsinschools(PLCsupports, professional learning),○ READActSupports

• InELACMAS:○ Allgradelevels increased inpercentofstudentswhometorexceeded

achievement expectations from2015-16○ Allgradelevels increased instudentgrowthfrom2015-16

Challenges for2017-18:• Dataamongsubgroups aremostlyunchanged • Increased demand formoreinstructionalsupport

4

3rd Grade 4th Grade 5th Grade 6th Grade 7th Grade 8th Grade*

Algebra 1**

Geometry**

Algebra 2**

Colorado 40 34 34 31 26 21 33 32 77Jeffco 47 40 41 41 33 20 42 75 91

0

20

40

60

80

100

Per

cent

Met

/Exc

eede

d E

xpec

tatio

ns2016-17 Jeffco/Colorado

CMAS MathematicsAchievement Comparison

Percent Met/Exceeded

*Approximately one-third of Jeffco eighth grade students are included in CMAS Algebra I and Geometry assessment results instead of the standard grade 8 math assessment, so state comparisons are not equivalent for the single assessment (grade 8 CMAS Math) in which Jeffco did not exceed state performance. **Algebra 1, Geometry, and Algebra 2 results are reflective of all students who took these assessments regardless of grade level (e.g. Geometry results include students in grades 8 and 9).

5

3rd Grade 4th Grade 5th Grade 6th Grade 7th Grade 8th Grade* Algebra 1**

Geometry**

Algebra 2**

2015-2016 45 39 42 41 35 19 40 75 832016-2017 47 40 41 41 33 20 42 75 91

0

20

40

60

80

100

Per

cent

Met

/Exc

eede

d E

xpec

tatio

nsJeffco 2-Year Trend

CMAS Math Achievement Percent Met/Exceeded

*Approximately one-third of Jeffco eighth grade students are included in CMAS Algebra I and Geometry assessment results instead of the standard grade 8 math assessment, so state comparisons are not equivalent for the single assessment (grade 8 CMAS Math) in which Jeffco did not exceed state performance. **Algebra 1, Geometry, and Algebra 2 results are reflective of all students who took these assessments regardless of grade level (e.g. Geometry results include students in grades 8 and 9).

6

Jeffco CMAS Growth by Subgroup: Mathematics

Median Growth Percentile

7

AlgebraicThinkingStrengthsfrom2016-17:• Successforacceleratedmathstudents• AdditionalContentSpecialists/Instructional Specialistspartnership in

planning• Additionalprofessional development offerings forteachers

Challenges for2017-18:• Gapbetween acceleratedandgradelevel students

– Percentageofstudentscompleting9th gradeAlgebraI• Dataamongsubgroups aremostlyunchanged • Increased demand formoreinstructionalsupport

8

2016-17 Jeffco/ColoradoCMAS Science Achievement Comparison

Percent Met or Exceeded

5th Grade 8th Grade 11th GradeColorado 35% 30% 25%Jeffco 42% 40% 35%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Perc

en

t M

et o

r Exc

ee

de

d

9

Jeffco 2-Year TrendCMAS Science Achievement

Percent Met or Exceeded

5th Grade 8th Grade 11th Grade2015-2016 41% 39% 34%2016-2017 42% 40% 35%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Perc

en

t M

et o

r Exc

ee

de

d

10

EBRW* Math Overall ScoreColorado 478 469 947Jeffco 494 486 980

320

520

720

920

1120

1320

1520

Me

an

Test

Sc

ore

2016-17 Jeffco/Colorado

Colorado PSAT Mean Test Score Comparison

* EBRW: Evidence-Based Reading and Writing. PSAT scale ranges from 320 to 1520.

11

EBRW Math Met Both2015-16 74% 50% 48%2016-17 74% 51% 49%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Perc

ent

Me

etin

g B

enc

hma

rk

Jeffco Colorado PSATStudents Meeting CollegeReadiness Benchmarks

2016-17

• EBRW: Evidence-Based Reading and Writing.• According to College Board, SAT college and career readiness indicates a 75% likelihood of achieving at

least a C in related first-semester, credit-bearing college courses. The grade level benchmarks associated with the PSAT 10 are based on expected student growth toward the SAT benchmarks at each grade level.

*

12

EBRW* Math Overall ScoreColorado 513 501 1014Jeffco 536 526 1062

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

Me

an

Test

Sc

ore

2016-17 Jeffco/Colorado

Colorado SAT Mean Test Score Comparison

* EBRW: Evidence-Based Reading and Writing. SAT scale ranges from 400 to 1600.

13

EBRW* Math Met Both2016-17 71% 51% 49%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Perc

ent

Me

etin

g B

enc

hma

rk

2016-17 Jeffco Colorado SAT

Percent Meeting CollegeReadiness Benchmarks

• EBRW: Evidence-Based Reading and Writing• According to College Board, SAT college and career readiness indicates a 75% likelihood of

achieving at least a C in related first-semester, credit-bearing college courses. 14

JeffcoSATMedianGrowthbySubgroup

15

SAT Median Growth Percentiles compare student growth from Colorado PSAT in grade 10 to Colorado SAT in grade 11.

College&CareerReadyStrengthsfrom2016-17:• Jeffcoexceeds thestateinEBRW* andmathforPSAT/SAT

• 71%ofJeffco2017SATparticipantsreached theCollegeBoard’scollegeandcareer readiness benchmarkforevidence basedreadingandwriting

Challenges for2017-18:•Numberofstudents takingtheassessment arenotdemonstratingproficiency inEBRW* andMathematics

16* EBRW-Evidence Based Reading and Writing

NextSteps• Workwithteacherstocreateandimplementauthentictasks

• Prioritizesupportforlowachievingschools

• ImplementprofessionallearningtosupportthemeasurementofJeffcocompetencies

• Continuetobuildstaffcapacitytousestudentdataeffectivelyforinstructionalplanning

17

2017PerformanceReviewSubgroupPerformance

Appendix

18

2017CMAS/PARCCJeffco EnglishLanguageArts(ELA)

• Overall performance• Subgroups

o Gendero Ethnicityo Free/Reduced Lunch (FRL)o Individual Education Plans (IEP)o Advanced Learning Plans (ALP)o Language Proficiency

19

3rd Grade 4th Grade 5th Grade 6th Grade 7th Grade 8th Grade 9th GradeN = 6,079 N = 6,124 N = 6,031 N = 6,035 N = 6,002 N = 5,979 N = 5,324

Exceeded 4% 14% 7% 9% 16% 11% 8%Met 41% 38% 45% 43% 35% 40% 36%Approached 24% 25% 25% 28% 24% 23% 27%Partially Met 16% 15% 15% 14% 15% 14% 17%Did Not Yet Meet 15% 8% 8% 6% 10% 11% 13%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Per

cent

of S

tude

nts

Jeffco CMASELA Grades 3-9

2016 -17

Performance Expectations

20

JeffcoCMASELAGrades3-9Subgroup- Gender

2016-17

3rd Grade 4th Grade 5th Grade 6th Grade 7th Grade 8th Grade 9th GradeFemale 50% 58% 60% 60% 61% 62% 55%Male 41% 46% 45% 44% 42% 41% 34%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Per

cent

Met

or E

xcee

ded

Exp

ecta

tions

21

JeffcoCMASELAGrades3-9Subgroup- Ethnicity

2016-17

3rd Grade

4th Grade

5th Grade

6th Grade

7th Grade

8th Grade

9th Grade

White 52% 58% 60% 58% 59% 58% 50%Hispanic 28% 34% 33% 34% 31% 31% 28%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Per

cent

Met

or E

xcee

ded

Exp

ecta

tions

* Due to small counts of students in groups American Indian, Asian, Black, Pacific Islander, and Multiple (2 or more races), two subgroups have been reported.

22

JeffcoCMASELAGrades3-9Subgroup– FreeandReducedLunch(FRL)

2016-17

3rd Grade

4th Grade

5th Grade

6th Grade

7th Grade

8th Grade

9th Grade

FRL 26% 30% 28% 30% 27% 27% 25%No FRL 54% 62% 63% 62% 62% 61% 51%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Per

cent

Met

or E

xcee

ded

Exp

ecta

tions

23

JeffcoCMASELAGrades3-9Subgroup– IndividualizedEducationProgram(IEP)

2016-17

3rd Grade

4th Grade

5th Grade

6th Grade

7th Grade

8th Grade

9th Grade

IEP 7% 10% 9% 10% 9% 8% 5%Exited IEP 36% 43% 48% 41% 49% 38% 32%No IEP 50% 57% 58% 58% 56% 56% 48%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Perc

ent M

et o

r Exc

eede

d Ex

pect

atio

ns

24

JeffcoCMASELAGrades3-9Subgroup– AdvancedLearningPlan(ALP)

2016-17

3rd Grade

4th Grade

5th Grade

6th Grade

7th Grade

8th Grade

9th Grade

ALP 83% 88% 90% 87% 87% 86% 79%No ALP 38% 44% 46% 45% 43% 41% 34%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Per

cent

Met

or E

xcee

ded

Exp

ecta

tions

25

JeffcoCMASELAGrades3-9Subgroup– LanguageProficiency

2016-17

3rd Grade

4th Grade

5th Grade

6th Grade

7th Grade

8th Grade

9th Grade

NEP 3% 3% 0% 2% 4% 4% 0%LEP 22% 18% 9% 10% 10% 6% 9%FEP 83% 74% 67% 60% 58% 60% 53%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Per

cent

Met

or E

xcee

ded

Exp

ecta

tions

• NEP: Non English Proficient; LEP: Limited English Proficient; FEP: Fluent English Proficient

26

2017CMAS/PARCCJeffcoMathematicsResults


o Gendero Ethnicityo Free/Reduced Lunch (FRL)o Individual Education Plans (IEP)o Advanced Learning Plans (ALP)

27

3rd Grade 4th Grade 5th Grade 6th GradeN = 6,195 N = 6,017 N = 6,014 N = 6,088

Exceeded 11% 4% 7% 7%Met 36% 35% 34% 34%Approached 26% 28% 28% 28%Partially Met 16% 21% 20% 21%Did Not Yet Meet 12% 12% 11% 10%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Perc

ent o

f Stu

dent

sJeffco CMAS

Math Grades 3-62016-17


28

JeffcoCMASMathGrades3-6Subgroup–Gender

2016-17

3rd Grade 4th Grade 5th Grade 6th GradeFemale 46% 57% 40% 41%Male 48% 46% 42% 42%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Per

cent

Met

or E

xcee

ded

Exp

ecta

tions

29

JeffcoCMASMathGrades3-6Subgroup– Ethnicity

2016-17

3rd Grade 4th Grade 5th Grade 6th GradeWhite 55% 47% 48% 49%Hispanic 27% 20% 21% 20%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Per

cent

Met

or E

xcee

ded

Exp

ecta

tions

30


JeffcoCMASMathGrades3-6Subgroup– FreeandReducedLunch(FRL)

2016-17

3rd Grade 4th Grade 5th Grade 6th GradeFRL 25% 19% 18% 18%No FRL 58% 50% 51% 52%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Per

cent

Met

or E

xcee

ded

Exp

ecta

tions

31

JeffcoCMASMathGrades3-6Subgroup– IndividualizedEducationProgram(IEP)

2016-17

3rd Grade 4th Grade 5th Grade 6th GradeIEP 11% 8% 10% 9%Exited IEP 42% 32% 40% 35%No IEP 41% 44% 45% 45%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Per

cent

Met

or E

xcee

ded

Exp

ecta

tions

32

JeffcoCMASMathGrades3-6Subgroup– AdvancedLearningPlan(ALP)

2016-17

3rd Grade 4th Grade 5th Grade 6th GradeALP 88% 85% 87% 85%No ALP 39% 30% 33% 33%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Per

cent

Met

or E

xcee

ded

Exp

ecta

tions

33

JeffcoCMASMathGrades3-6Subgroup– LanguageProficiency

2016-17

• NEP: Non English Proficient; LEP: Limited English Proficient; FEP: Fluent English Proficient

3rd Grade 4th Grade 5th Grade 6th GradeNEP 10% 6% 2% 0%LEP 25% 11% 6% 8%FEP 84% 59% 49% 42%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Per

cent

Met

or E

xcee

ded

Exp

ecta

tions

34

7th Grade 8th Grade

7th Grade Math 7th Grade Algebra I 8th Grade Math 8th Grade Algebra I 8th Grade GeometryN = 5,817 N = 255 N = 3,791 N = 1,404 N = 321

Exceeded 3% 9% 0% 4% 17%Met 31% 83% 20% 71% 75%Approached 36% 7% 30% 20% 8%Partially Met 23% 1% 25% 4% 1%Did Not Yet Meet 8% 0% 25% 1% 0%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Perc

ent o

f Stu

dent

sJeffco CMAS

Math Grades 7-82016-17


35

9th Grade Algebra I 9th Grade Geometry 9th Grade Algebra IIN = 3,697 N = 1,209 N = 300

Exceeded 0% 6% 14%Met 22% 66% 76%Approached 32% 24% 8%Partially Met 30% 4% 1%Did Not Yet Meet 16% 1% 0%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Perc

ent o

f Stu

dent

sJeffco CMASMath Grade 9

2016-17


36

JeffcoCMASMathGrades7,8,AlgebraI,Geometry,AlgebraII

Subgroup–Gender2016-17

• Only students in grades 7 and 8, respectively, took the 7th and 8th Grade assessments. However the Algebra I, Geometry, and Algebra II assessments were taken by both accelerated 7th and 8th grade students and high school students.

7th Grade Math

8th Grade Math Algebra I Geometry Algebra II

Female 33% 22% 63% 83% 91%Male 32% 18% 63% 80% 90%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Per

cent

Met

or E

xcee

ded

Exp

ecta

tions

37


Subgroup– Ethnicity2016-17

• Due to small counts of students in groups American Indian, Asian, Black, Pacific Islander, and Multiple (2 or more races), two subgroups have been reported.


7th Grade Math


White 41% 25% 66% 83% 92%Hispanic 15% 9% 51% 74% 84%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Per

cent

Met

or E

xcee

ded

Exp

ecta

tions

38


Subgroup– FreeandReducedLunch(FRL)2016-17


7th Grade Math


FRL 15% 9% 43% 73% 76%No FRL 43% 27% 67% 78% 91%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Per

cent

Met

or E

xcee

ded

Exp

ecta

tions

39


Subgroup– IndividualizedEducationProgram(IEP)2016-17


7th Grade Math


IEP 6% 4% 11% 56% 100%Exited IEP 36% 17% 62% 83% 75%No IEP 36% 23% 64% 82% 76%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Per

cent

Met

or E

xcee

ded

Exp

ecta

tions

40


Subgroup– AdvancedLearningPlan(ALP)2016-17


7th Grade Math


ALP 80% 50% 79% 60% 93%No ALP 25% 18% 55% 46% 82%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Per

cent

Met

or E

xcee

ded

Exp

ecta

tions

41

JeffcoCMASMathGrades7,8,AlgebraI,Geometry,AlgebraIISubgroup– LanguageProficiency

2016-17

• NEP: Non English Proficient; LEP: Limited English Proficient; FEP: Fluent English Proficient• Only students in grades 7 and 8, respectively, took the 7th and 8th Grade assessments. However the Algebra I,

Geometry, and Algebra II assessments were taken by both accelerated 7th and 8th grade students and high school students.

7th Grade Math


NEP 0% 6% 2% 33% 0%LEP 5% 3% 9% 43% 100%FEP 38% 26% 43% 65% 95%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Per

cent

Met

or E

xcee

ded

Exp

ecta

tions

42

2017 JeffcoResultsCMAS Science


o Gendero Ethnicityo Free/Reduced Lunch (FRL)o Individual Education Plans (IEP)o Language Proficiency

43

• Due to CDE’s 3-year sampling model, CMAS Social Studies data have not been included since results do not represent districtwide performance.

Jeffco CMAS Science: Grades 5, 8, & 11Met or Exceeded Expectations

5th Grade 8th Grade 11th Grade2015-16 41% 38% 34%2016-17 42% 40% 35%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Perc

en

t M

et o

r Exc

ee

de

d

44

5th Grade 8th Grade 11th GradeFemale 42% 42% 33%Male 42% 38% 36%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Per

cent

Met

or E

xcee

ded

Exp

ecta

tions

Jeffco CMAS Science: Grades 5, 8 & 11Subgroup - Gender

2016-2017

45


5rd Grade 8th Grade 11th GradeWhite 51% 48% 42%Hispanic 20% 18% 15%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Per

cent

Met

or E

xcee

ded

Exp

ecta

tions

Jeffco CMAS Science: Grades 5, 8 & 11Subgroup - Ethnicity

2016-2017

46

5th Grade 8th Grade 11th GradeFRL 18% 15% 15%No FRL 54% 50% 42%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Per

cent

Met

or E

xcee

ded

Exp

ecta

tions

Jeffco CMAS Science: Grades 5, 8 & 11Subgroup – Free and Reduced Lunch

2016-2017

47

5th Grade 8th Grade 11th GradeIEP 8% 5% 6%No IEP 46% 43% 37%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Per

cent

Met

or E

xcee

ded

Exp

ecta

tions

Jeffco CMAS Science: Grades 5, 8 & 11Subgroup – Individualized Education Program

2016-2017

48

5th Grade 8th Grade 11th GradeNEP 0% 4% 0%LEP 4% 3% 2%FEP 43% 40% 29%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Per

cent

Met

or E

xcee

ded

Exp

ecta

tions

Jeffco CMAS Science: Grades 5, 8 & 11Subgroup – Language Proficiency

2016-17

49

OurMissionand2020Vision

To provide a quality education that prepares all children for a successful future.

In order for students to pursue their life goals, by 2020 all Jeffco graduates will be able to apply the Jeffco 2020 competencies.

50

boe district performance review 2017-18final · 2019-05-18 · district performance review jeffco...

Documents