pisa oecd programme for international student assessment learning trends maciej jakubowski 10...
TRANSCRIPT
1111P
ISA
OE
CD
Pro
gram
me
for
Inte
rnat
iona
l Stu
dent
Ass
essm
ent
Lear
ning
tren
dsM
aci
ej J
aku
bo
wsk
i1
0 F
eb
rua
ry 2
01
1
Learning TrendsChanges in student performance
since 2000
Maciej JakubowskiAnalyst, Indicators and Analysis Division, Directorate for Education, OECD
Programme for International Student Assessment
2222P
ISA
OE
CD
Pro
gram
me
for
Inte
rnat
iona
l Stu
dent
Ass
essm
ent
Lear
ning
tren
dsM
aci
ej J
aku
bo
wsk
i1
0 F
eb
rua
ry 2
01
1Trends: monitoring performance over
time Monitoring reading performance since 2000
Similar reading assessment frameworks– Reading framework was only slightly updated since 2000 to
include digital reading A pool of test questions common to all PISA assessments
– 39 identical items were used in both 2000 and 2009– 26 identical items were used across all reading assessments
Identical sampling procedures Additional checks to assure comparability of the results
– Results adjusted for demographic changes and sampling modifications give nearly identical results
– Results are consistent with non-scaled student responses (percentage of correct answers)
Trends in mathematics performance since 2003 Trends in science performance since 2006
3333P
ISA
OE
CD
Pro
gram
me
for
Inte
rnat
iona
l Stu
dent
Ass
essm
ent
Lear
ning
tren
dsM
aci
ej J
aku
bo
wsk
i1
0 F
eb
rua
ry 2
01
1
Performance trends in PISA
4444P
ISA
OE
CD
Pro
gram
me
for
Inte
rnat
iona
l Stu
dent
Ass
essm
ent
Lear
ning
tren
dsM
aci
ej J
aku
bo
wsk
i1
0 F
eb
rua
ry 2
01
1
How reading performance changed since 2000?
5555P
ISA
OE
CD
Pro
gram
me
for
Inte
rnat
iona
l Stu
dent
Ass
essm
ent
Lear
ning
tren
dsM
aci
ej J
aku
bo
wsk
i1
0 F
eb
rua
ry 2
01
1Change in reading performance between 2000 and
2009
Reading performance
improved
Reading performance
declined
6666P
ISA
OE
CD
Pro
gram
me
for
Inte
rnat
iona
l Stu
dent
Ass
essm
ent
Lear
ning
tren
dsM
aci
ej J
aku
bo
wsk
i1
0 F
eb
rua
ry 2
01
1
How countries perform in reading and how reading performance has changed since
2000
High performanceDeclining
Low performanceDeclining
High performanceIncreasing
Low performanceIncreasing
7777P
ISA
OE
CD
Pro
gram
me
for
Inte
rnat
iona
l Stu
dent
Ass
essm
ent
Lear
ning
tren
dsM
aci
ej J
aku
bo
wsk
i1
0 F
eb
rua
ry 2
01
1
Percentage of students below reading proficiency Level 2
2000
2009
8888P
ISA
OE
CD
Pro
gram
me
for
Inte
rnat
iona
l Stu
dent
Ass
essm
ent
Lear
ning
tren
dsM
aci
ej J
aku
bo
wsk
i1
0 F
eb
rua
ry 2
01
1Percentage of top performers in reading
2000
2009
9999P
ISA
OE
CD
Pro
gram
me
for
Inte
rnat
iona
l Stu
dent
Ass
essm
ent
Lear
ning
tren
dsM
aci
ej J
aku
bo
wsk
i1
0 F
eb
rua
ry 2
01
1
Closer look at improving countries
10101010P
ISA
OE
CD
Pro
gram
me
for
Inte
rnat
iona
l Stu
dent
Ass
essm
ent
Lear
ning
tren
dsM
aci
ej J
aku
bo
wsk
i1
0 F
eb
rua
ry 2
01
1
Share of students below proficiency Level 2
increased
Change in the share of boys and girls who are low performers in reading between 2000 and 2009
Share of students below proficiency Level 2
decreased
11111111P
ISA
OE
CD
Pro
gram
me
for
Inte
rnat
iona
l Stu
dent
Ass
essm
ent
Lear
ning
tren
dsM
aci
ej J
aku
bo
wsk
i1
0 F
eb
rua
ry 2
01
1Different patterns of performance change
among boys and girls
12121212P
ISA
OE
CD
Pro
gram
me
for
Inte
rnat
iona
l Stu
dent
Ass
essm
ent
Lear
ning
tren
dsM
aci
ej J
aku
bo
wsk
i1
0 F
eb
rua
ry 2
01
1
Low average performance
Large socio-economic disparities
High average performance
Large socio-economic disparities
Low average performance
High social equity
High average performance
High social equity
Socially equitable distribution of
learning opportunities
High reading performance
Strong socio-economic impact on
student performance
Low reading performance
13131313P
ISA
OE
CD
Pro
gram
me
for
Inte
rnat
iona
l Stu
dent
Ass
essm
ent
Lear
ning
tren
dsM
aci
ej J
aku
bo
wsk
i1
0 F
eb
rua
ry 2
01
1
.
Low reading performance
High reading performance
Low average performance
Large socio-economic disparities
High average performance
Large socio-economic disparities
Low average performance
High social equity
High average performance
High social equity
Socially equitable distribution of
learning opportunities
Strong socio-economic impact on
student performance
14141414P
ISA
OE
CD
Pro
gram
me
for
Inte
rnat
iona
l Stu
dent
Ass
essm
ent
Lear
ning
tren
dsM
aci
ej J
aku
bo
wsk
i1
0 F
eb
rua
ry 2
01
1
.
Low reading performance
High reading performance
Low average performance
Large socio-economic disparities
High average performance
Large socio-economic disparities
Low average performance
High social equity
High average performance
High social equity
Socially equitable distribution of
learning opportunities
Strong socio-economic impact on
student performance
15151515P
ISA
OE
CD
Pro
gram
me
for
Inte
rnat
iona
l Stu
dent
Ass
essm
ent
Lear
ning
tren
dsM
aci
ej J
aku
bo
wsk
i1
0 F
eb
rua
ry 2
01
1
Low reading performance
Low average performance
Large socio-economic disparities
High average performance
Large socio-economic disparities
Low average performance
High social equity
High average performance
High social equity
Socially equitable distribution of
learning opportunities
High reading performance
Strong socio-economic impact on
student performance
16161616P
ISA
OE
CD
Pro
gram
me
for
Inte
rnat
iona
l Stu
dent
Ass
essm
ent
Lear
ning
tren
dsM
aci
ej J
aku
bo
wsk
i1
0 F
eb
rua
ry 2
01
1
Low average performance
Large socio-economic disparities
High average performance
Large socio-economic disparities
Low average performance
High social equity
High reading performance
High average performance
High social equity
Socially equitable distribution of
learning opportunities
Strong socio-economic impact on
student performance
Low reading performance
Shanghai- China
KoreaFinland
Hong Kong- ChinaSingapore CanadaNew Zealand J apan
Australia
NetherlandsBelgiumNorway EstoniaSwitzerland
PolandI celandUnited States LiechtensteinSwedenGermany I relandFrance Chinese TaipeiDenmark
United KingdomHungary
PortugalMacao- China
I taly LatviaSlovenia GreeceCzech Republic Slovak Republic CroatiaI srael LuxembourgAustria Lithuania
TurkeyDubai (UAE) Russian Federation
ChileSerbia
BulgariaUruguay MexicoRomania
ThailandTrinidad and TobagoColombia
BrazilMontenegro
J ordan TunisiaI ndonesiaArgentina
17171717P
ISA
OE
CD
Pro
gram
me
for
Inte
rnat
iona
l Stu
dent
Ass
essm
ent
Lear
ning
tren
dsM
aci
ej J
aku
bo
wsk
i1
0 F
eb
rua
ry 2
01
1
How mathematics performance changed since 2003?
18181818P
ISA
OE
CD
Pro
gram
me
for
Inte
rnat
iona
l Stu
dent
Ass
essm
ent
Lear
ning
tren
dsM
aci
ej J
aku
bo
wsk
i1
0 F
eb
rua
ry 2
01
1Change in mathematics performance
between 2003 and 2009
Mathematics performance
improved
Mathematics performance
declined
19191919P
ISA
OE
CD
Pro
gram
me
for
Inte
rnat
iona
l Stu
dent
Ass
essm
ent
Lear
ning
tren
dsM
aci
ej J
aku
bo
wsk
i1
0 F
eb
rua
ry 2
01
1
How countries perform in mathematics and how mathematics performance has changed
since 2003
High performanceDeclining
Low performanceDeclining
High performanceIncreasing
Low performanceIncreasing
20202020P
ISA
OE
CD
Pro
gram
me
for
Inte
rnat
iona
l Stu
dent
Ass
essm
ent
Lear
ning
tren
dsM
aci
ej J
aku
bo
wsk
i1
0 F
eb
rua
ry 2
01
1
Percentage of students below proficiency Level 2 in mathematics
2003
2009
21212121P
ISA
OE
CD
Pro
gram
me
for
Inte
rnat
iona
l Stu
dent
Ass
essm
ent
Lear
ning
tren
dsM
aci
ej J
aku
bo
wsk
i1
0 F
eb
rua
ry 2
01
1Percentage of top performers in mathematics
2003
2009
22222222P
ISA
OE
CD
Pro
gram
me
for
Inte
rnat
iona
l Stu
dent
Ass
essm
ent
Lear
ning
tren
dsM
aci
ej J
aku
bo
wsk
i1
0 F
eb
rua
ry 2
01
1
How science performance changed since 2006?
23232323P
ISA
OE
CD
Pro
gram
me
for
Inte
rnat
iona
l Stu
dent
Ass
essm
ent
Lear
ning
tren
dsM
aci
ej J
aku
bo
wsk
i1
0 F
eb
rua
ry 2
01
1
Science performance
improved
Science performance
declined
Change in science performance between 2006 and 2009
24242424P
ISA
OE
CD
Pro
gram
me
for
Inte
rnat
iona
l Stu
dent
Ass
essm
ent
Lear
ning
tren
dsM
aci
ej J
aku
bo
wsk
i1
0 F
eb
rua
ry 2
01
1How countries perform in science and how
science performance has changed since 2006
High performanceDeclining
Low performanceDeclining
High performanceIncreasing
Low performanceIncreasing
25252525P
ISA
OE
CD
Pro
gram
me
for
Inte
rnat
iona
l Stu
dent
Ass
essm
ent
Lear
ning
tren
dsM
aci
ej J
aku
bo
wsk
i1
0 F
eb
rua
ry 2
01
1
Percentage of students below proficiency Level 2 in science
2006
2009
26262626P
ISA
OE
CD
Pro
gram
me
for
Inte
rnat
iona
l Stu
dent
Ass
essm
ent
Lear
ning
tren
dsM
aci
ej J
aku
bo
wsk
i1
0 F
eb
rua
ry 2
01
1Percentage of top performers in science
2006
2009
27272727P
ISA
OE
CD
Pro
gram
me
for
Inte
rnat
iona
l Stu
dent
Ass
essm
ent
Lear
ning
tren
dsM
aci
ej J
aku
bo
wsk
i1
0 F
eb
rua
ry 2
01
1
Quality differences between schools
28282828P
ISA
OE
CD
Pro
gram
me
for
Inte
rnat
iona
l Stu
dent
Ass
essm
ent
Lear
ning
tren
dsM
aci
ej J
aku
bo
wsk
i1
0 F
eb
rua
ry 2
01
1Variability in student performance
29292929P
ISA
OE
CD
Pro
gram
me
for
Inte
rnat
iona
l Stu
dent
Ass
essm
ent
Lear
ning
tren
dsM
aci
ej J
aku
bo
wsk
i1
0 F
eb
rua
ry 2
01
1
Variability in student performance between and within schools
Variation between schools
Variation within schools
30303030P
ISA
OE
CD
Pro
gram
me
for
Inte
rnat
iona
l Stu
dent
Ass
essm
ent
Lear
ning
tren
dsM
aci
ej J
aku
bo
wsk
i1
0 F
eb
rua
ry 2
01
1
Student engagement with school
31313131P
ISA
OE
CD
Pro
gram
me
for
Inte
rnat
iona
l Stu
dent
Ass
essm
ent
Lear
ning
tren
dsM
aci
ej J
aku
bo
wsk
i1
0 F
eb
rua
ry 2
01
1Students' views of teacher-student relations
32323232P
ISA
OE
CD
Pro
gram
me
for
Inte
rnat
iona
l Stu
dent
Ass
essm
ent
Lear
ning
tren
dsM
aci
ej J
aku
bo
wsk
i1
0 F
eb
rua
ry 2
01
1Students’ view of climate for learning
The following things happen never, rarely or only in some lessons…
33333333P
ISA
OE
CD
Pro
gram
me
for
Inte
rnat
iona
l Stu
dent
Ass
essm
ent
Lear
ning
tren
dsM
aci
ej J
aku
bo
wsk
i1
0 F
eb
rua
ry 2
01
1
Thank you !Thank you !
More on trends in PISA: Volume V, Learning Trends: Changes in
student Performance since 2000
Find out more about PISA at… OECD www.pisa.oecd.org
Email: [email protected]