Geothermal Development Project (RRP INO 52282)

Draft RESETTLEMENT PLAN

Draft Project Number: 52096-001 November 2019

INO: Proposed Geothermal Power Generation Project (Dieng Geothermal Plant Expansion Sub-Project) Prepared by PT Deo Dipa Energi The resettlement plan is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. Your attention is directed to the “Term of Use” section of this website. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area.

i

Dieng Geothermal Plant Expansion Sub-Project

Resettlement Plan

PT Geo Dipa Energi October 2019

ii

I. TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES ................................................................................................................ IV LIST OF FIGURES .............................................................................................................. IV LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS .................................................................................................. V DEFINITION OF TERMS ..................................................................................................... VI I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................... 1 II. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................... 6

A. BACKGROUND .............................................................................................................. 6 B. SUB-PROJECT DESCRIPTION ........................................................................................ 6

III. SCOPE OF LAND ACQUISITION AND RESETTLEMENT ........................................... 9 A. LAND REQUIREMENTS .................................................................................................. 9 B. DUE DILIGENCE CONCERNING LAND OWNED / LEASED BY GEO DIPA ................................ 9 C. INVENTORY OF LOSSES (IOL)...................................................................................... 12 D. SCOPE OF IMPACTS .................................................................................................... 13

IV. SOCIO-ECONOMIC PROFILE AND PERCEPTIONS OF AFFECTED PEOPLE ........ 18 A. PROFILE OF KARANG TENGAH ..................................................................................... 18 B. SUMMARY OF SOCIO-ECONOMIC SURVEY FINDINGS ..................................................... 19

V. LEGAL FRAMEWORK ................................................................................................ 31 A. NATIONAL REGULATIONS ............................................................................................ 31 B. ASIAN DEVELOPMENT BANK (ADB) POLICY ................................................................. 33 C. GAP ANALYSIS ........................................................................................................... 34 D. PROJECT RESETTLEMENT PRINCIPLES ........................................................................ 34 E. PROCEDURE AND PRINCIPLE OF NEGOTIATED LAND ACQUISITION FOR PIPELINE AND

INSPECTION ROAD ROW ................................................................................................... 36 F. LAND CLEARING PROCEDURE ..................................................................................... 38 G. UNANTICIPATED IMPACTS AND RP UPDATE. ................................................................. 38

VI. CONSULTATION, PARTICIPATION, AND INFORMATION DISCLOSURE ............... 39 A. CONSULTATION AND PARTICIPATION ............................................................................ 39 B. DISCLOSURE .............................................................................................................. 41

VII. GRIEVANCE REDRESS MECHANISM ................................................................... 47 VIII. ENTITLEMENTS, ASSISTANCE AND BENEFITS .................................................. 50

A. ELIGIBILITIES.............................................................................................................. 50 B. ENTITLEMENT MATRIX ................................................................................................ 50 C. VALUATION OF ASSETS ............................................................................................... 54 D. SPECIAL ASSISTANCE TO SEVERELY AFFECTED AND VULNERABLE HOUSEHOLDS ........... 55

IX. LIVELIHOOD RESTORATION .................................................................................... 57 A. SUMMARY OF LIVELIHOOD RESTORATION ASSESSMENT ............................................... 57 B. LIVELIHOOD RESTORATION STRATEGY & ASSISTANCE PACKAGE .................................. 59 C. LONG TERM RE-ORIENTATION OF COMDEV PROGRAM ................................................. 62 D. IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE ...................................................................................... 63 E. ESTIMATED BUDGET ................................................................................................... 63

X. RESETTLEMENT BUDGET AND FINANCING PLAN ................................................ 68 A. ESTIMATED COST FOR RESETTLEMENT ........................................................................ 68 B. PROCEDURE FOR FUNDS FLOW MECHANISM ............................................................... 68

XI. INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS .......................................................................... 70 A. INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS ................................................................................. 70 B. CAPACITY BUILDING ................................................................................................... 75 C. IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE FOR RP.......................................................................... 75

XII. MONITORING AND REPORTING ........................................................................... 77 A. INTERNAL MONITORING .............................................................................................. 77 B. INTERNAL MONITORING INDICATORS ............................................................................ 78

iii

C. EXTERNAL MONITORING ............................................................................................. 79 D. REPORTING AND DISCLOSURE .................................................................................... 81

APPENDICES

1. Status of Land Certification Process for GDE-owned land

2. Lease Agreement for Use land at GDE-owned (ex-mess GDE) site

3. IOL Questionnaire and sample map

4. Map of the 6 plots land to be acquired

5. Confirmation from Head of Karang Tengah Village on the land ownership status of 6 land that to be acquired

6. Lay-out map of the individual plots of land leased to 23 tenant farmers

7. List of tenant farmers and size of plot leased

8. Lay out map of occupied land between well pad 10 to well pad 7

9. List of AHs, Losses and Summary of Socio Economic Profiles

10. SES data collection instruments

11. Karang Tengah Village Profile and SES Results

12. Gap Analysis

13. Summary Community Consultation Reports for the Dieng Geothermal site

14. Attendance sheets for 4 FGDs

15. NGO Consultation Report, 11 October 2019

16. Dieng-2 draft PIB

17. Livelihood Restoration Assessment

18. TOR for Specialist NGO services (geo-social-spatial information system)

19. TORs for PMC Consultants for RP and ComDev Reorientation

20. Template for Internal Monitoring Report

21. TOR for External Monitoring Agency

iv

II. LIST OF TABLES

Table 1. Project Components and Land Requirements for the Proposed Dieng Geothermal Power Plant

Expansion.................................................................................................................................................... 10

Table 2. Potential number of households affected by land acquisition and land clearingTable ............... 15

Table 3. Severely Affected Households ...................................................................................................... 16

Table 4. Vulnerable Affected Households ................................................................................................... 16

Table 5. Summary of Impacts due to Land Acquisition and Land Clearing ................................................ 17

Table 6. Profile of Karang Tengah Village .................................................................................................. 18

Table 7. Number of Persons Living with the AHs* and Number of Gainfully Employed ............................. 21

Table 8. Other Views Concerning the Sub-project ..................................................................................... 26

Table 9. Suggestions to Ensure that Benefits Accrue to Local Communities ............................................. 26

Table 10. Reasons given for support / rejection of the Project ................................................................... 27

Table 11. Best Ways to Mitigate Negative Impacts for Local Community .................................................. 28

Table 12. Best Way to Communicate Project Matters to Community ......................................................... 28

Table 13. Reasons for Responses Shown in Table .................................................................................... 29

Table 14. Party to Report Complaints to or to Seek Clarification Through ................................................. 29

Table 15. Consultation and Participation PlanTable .................................................................................. 43

Table 16. The Sub-project’s Entitlement Matrix .......................................................................................... 51

Table 17. Assessment Approaches Using Indonesia’s Valuation Standards ............................................. 54

Table 18. Livelihood Restoration Activities ................................................................................................. 60

Table 19. Implementation Schedule for Livelihood Restoration / Enhancement and new ComDev

Activities: ..................................................................................................................................................... 64

Table 20. Cost Estimates for Livelihood Restoration Plan and ComDev Reorientation Program under the

Dieng-2 Expansion sub-project. .................................................................................................................. 66

Table 21. Overall Cost Estimates For Resettlement Plan & Project Benefits ............................................. 69

Table 22. Responsibilities concerning Resettlement Plan implementation ................................................ 73

Table 23. Land Acquisition Implementation Schedule ................................................................................ 75

Table 24. Suggested Internal Monitoring Parameters and Indicators ........................................................ 78

Table 25. Suggested External Monitoring Indicators .................................................................................. 80

III. LIST OF FIGURES

Figure 1. Proposed Dieng Geothermal Plant Expansion Components – Power Plant, new wells (in

existing wellpads), SAGS (new pipeline alignment within existing pipeline and inspection roads ROW) .. 7

Figure 2. Adjusted Transmission Line Route From Dieng 1 Substation to Dieng 2 Power Plant ................. 8

Figure 3. Map of the Dieng-2 Sub-project ................................................................................................... 14

Figure 4. Educational Attainment of Respondents ..................................................................................... 20

Figure 5. Educational Attainment of Affected Household Members ........................................................... 20

Figure 6. Primary Occupation of AH Members ........................................................................................... 21

Figure 7. Dependency Ratio of AHs ........................................................................................................... 21

Figure 8. Combined Monthly Income of 28 AHs (based on combination of SES and IOL results (from

Appendix 9) ................................................................................................................................................. 23

Figure 9. Location of medical services in relation to AHs: .......................................................................... 24

Figure 10. Source of Water Supply for Drinking and Washing ................................................................... 24

Figure 11. Garbage Disposal Practices among the AHs ............................................................................ 25

Figure 12. AHs’ Views regarding the proposed Dieng-2 expansion sub-project ........................................ 25

Figure 13. Support for the Project ............................................................................................................... 27

Figure 14. How would you seek for clarification of submit complaints? ..................................................... 29

Figure 15. If you are still not satisfied, who will you approach for a solution? ............................................ 30

Figure 16. Land Acquisition Process for Pipeline and Inspection Road ROW ........................................... 37

v

Figure 17. Grievance Redress Mechanism ................................................................................................. 49

Figure 18. Project Organisational Structure for Resettlement Plan Implementation .................................. 72

CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (as of November 2019)

Currency unit – rupiah (Rp) Rp 1.00 = $ 0.000071 $ 1. = Rp. 14,200

IV. ABBREVIATIONS

ADB AP

Asian Development Bank Affected Person

APH AH

Akta Pelepasan Hak/ Ownership Transfer Letter Affected Household

BPN Badan Pertanahan Nasional / National Land Agency

CSR Corporate Social Responsibility

EPC Engineering, Procurement and Construction

GDE GOI

Geo Dipa Government of Indonesia

GPGP Geothermal Power Generation Project

GRM Grievance Redress Mechanism

IPPKH Ijin Pinjam Pakai Kawasan Hutan / Licence to Borrow of Forest Area

LRP Livelihood Restoration Plan

MOEF Ministry of Environment and Forestry

MOMR Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources

MW Megawatt

NGO Non-Governmental Organisation

NTP Notice To Proceed

PKK Pembinaan Kesejahteraan Keluarga / Village Women’s Organisation

PMN Penanaman Modal Negara / State Equity Injection

ROW Right of Way

RP Resettlement Plan

SHGB Sertifikat Hak Guna Bangunan / Certificate for Use of Building

SPS Safeguard Policy Statement

SS Sub-station

TL Transmission line

TOR Terms of Reference

vi

V. DEFINITION OF TERMS

Affected persons (APs) / Community / Households (AHs)

Refers to any person or persons, customary or local community, private or public institution who are displaced (physical or economic) as result of temporary impacts during construction, restriction on land use or on access to legally designated parks and protected areas. The affected community/ households/person are those who utilize, control, or possess the affected land or non-land objects.

Compensation Payment in cash or in kind (e.g. land-for-land) to replace losses of land, housing, income and other assets caused by the Project. All compensation is based on the principle of replacement cost, which is the method of valuing assets to replace the loss at current market value, and any transaction costs such as administrative charges, taxes, registration and titling costs. In the absence of functioning markets, a compensation structure is required that enables affected people to restore their livelihoods to level at least equivalent to those maintained at the time of dispossession, displacement, or restricted access.

Cut-off date Refers to the date prior to which the occupation or use of the project area makes residents/users of the same eligible to be categorized as AP, regardless of tenure status. In this project, the cut-off date will be the final day of the census of APs and the detailed measurement survey (DMS) of APs’ land and/or nonland assets. APs will be informed of the cut-off date for each project component, and any people who settle in the subproject area after the cut-off date will not be entitled to compensation and assistance under the project.

Displaced persons (DPs)

In the context of involuntary resettlement, displaced persons are those who are physically displaced (relocation, loss of residential land, or loss of shelter) and/or economically displaced (loss of land, assets, access to assets, income sources, or means of livelihoods) as a result of (i) involuntary acquisition of land, or (ii) involuntary restrictions on land use or on access to legally designated parks and protected areas (ADB IR Source Book, 2012).

Eligibility Refers to any person who has settled in the subproject area before the cut-off date who suffers from (i) loss of shelter, (ii) loss of assets (land, space above and below the surface of the land, buildings, plant, and objects related to the land) and/or or ability to access such assets, permanently or temporarily, or (iii) other losses that can be appraised. such as transaction costs, interest, loss of residual land, loss of income sources or livelihood regardless of relocation, profession shift, and other types of loss stated by the assignor, will be entitled to compensation and/or assistance).

Entitlement A range of measures comprising compensation, income restoration support, transfer assistance, income substitution, relocation support, etc. which are due to the AHs, depending on the type and severity of their losses, to restore their economic and social base.

Income / Livelihood Restoration Program

This involves re-establishing productive livelihood of the displaced persons to enable income generation equal to or, if possible, better than that earned by the displaced persons before the resettlement (ADB IR Source Book, 2012). This is a program designed with various activities that aim to support affected persons to recover their income / livelihood to pre-subproject levels. The program is designed to address the specific needs of the affected persons based on the socioeconomic survey and consultations.

Inventory of loss The listing of assets as a preliminary record of affected or lost assets during the preparation of the RP/RP where all fixed assets (i.e., land used for residence, commerce, agriculture; dwelling units; stalls and shops; secondary structures, such as fences, tombs, wells; standing crops and trees with commercial value; etc.) and sources of income and livelihood

vii

inside the Subproject boundaries are identified, measured, their owners identified, their exact location pinpointed, and their replacement costs calculated. The severity of impact on the affected assets and the severity of impact on the livelihood and productive capacity of the APs are likewise determined

Involuntary Resettlement

Refers to physical and economic displacement as a result of (i) involuntary acquisition of land, or (ii) involuntary restrictions on land use or on access to legally designated parks and protected areas. Such displacement can be full or partial, permanent or temporary. Refers to displaced persons have no right to refuse the land acquisition by the state that results in their displacement. This occurs when land is acquired through (i) expropriation by invoking the eminent domain power of the state, or (ii) land is acquired through negotiated settlement when the pricing is negotiated in a process where expropriation will be the consequence of a failure in the negotiation. (ADB IR Source Book, 2012)

Land Acquisition The process where an individual, household, firm or private institution is compelled by an agency needing land for public interest to alienate all or part of the land it owns or possesses to the ownership and possession of that agency in return for compensation at replacement costs.

Land clearing While land acquisition (defined above) refers to land to be purchased and ownership surrendered by land owners to GDE, land clearing refers to GDE-owned land that needs to be vacated by land users (tenant farmers, or farmers cultivating GDE-owned land without permission) before it can be cleared for construction activities.

Meaningful consultation

A process that (i) begins early in the project preparation stage and is carried out on an on-going basis throughout the project cycle; (ii) provides timely disclosure of relevant and adequate information that is understandable and readily accessible to affected people; (iii) is undertaken in an atmosphere free of intimidation or coercion; (iv) is gender inclusive and responsive, and tailored to the needs of disadvantaged and vulnerable groups; and (v) enables the incorporation of all relevant views of affected people and other stakeholders into decision making, such as project design, mitigation measures, the sharing of development benefits and opportunities, and implementation issues

Negotiated Land Acquisition

The agency in need of land can carry out land acquisition directly with the respective owners through negotiation based on the result of appraisal by an Appraiser or a Public Appraiser for the sake of efficiency. 1

Rehabilitation Assistance provided in cash or in kind to project APs (especially the vulnerable) due to the loss of productive assets, incomes, employment or sources of living, to supplement payment of compensation for acquired assets, to achieve, at a minimum, full restoration of living standards and quality of life.

Replacement cost The monetary value to replace affected assets and/or cover transaction costs necessary to replace the affected assets without depreciation for such assets as well as material advantage, taxes and/or travel expenses.

Resettlement Plan The social safeguard document that contains the policies and guidelines and time-bound action plan with budget, setting out the resettlement objectives and strategies, entitlements, activities and responsibilities, resettlement monitoring, and resettlement evaluation.

1 Per Regulation No. 6 of 2015 of the National Land Agency (Peraturan Menteri Agraria dan Tata Ruang / Kepala Badan Pertanahan Nasional Nomor 6 Tahun 2015 tentang Perubahan atas Peraturan Kepala Badan Pertanahan Nasional Nomor 5 Tahun 2012 tentang Petunjuk Teknis Pelaksanaan Pengadaan Tanah) paragraph 53, and Presidential Decree of the Republic of Indonesia Number 4 Year 2016 Concerning the Acceleration of Development of Electricity Infrastructures Article 34

viii

Severely affected persons

Those who experience significant/major impacts due to (i) losses of 10% or more of their total productive land, assets and/or income sources due to the project; and/or (ii) relocation due to insufficient remaining residential land to rebuild

Vulnerable groups Distinct groups of people who might suffer disproportionately or face the risk of being marginalized by the effects of resettlement and specifically include: (i) households headed by women, elderly, or disabled, (ii) households falling under the generally accepted indicator for poverty, (iii) landless households, and (iv) ethnic minorities.

1

VI. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

1. Project Description. To support expanded geothermal electricity generation in Java the proposed Geothermal Power Development Project (GPGP) will result an additional 110 megawatts (MW) of geothermal electricity generating capacity, 55 MW2 at the existing geothermal plant in Patuha - Ciwidey, Bandung, West Java and 55 MW at the existing Dieng geothermal plant in Wonosobo and Banjarnegara Districts, Central Java.3 2. The Dieng Geothermal Expansion sub-project (Dieng-2) will include drilling of new wells for geothermal fluid production and re-injection, and development of a steam above ground gathering system and fluid reinjection lines connecting wells and generating units. Dieng will have a combined cycle plant with both steam and Organic Rankine Cycle turbines. The sub-project will also support the transmission interconnection systems between the plants and the grid; this will include a new, 6-km underground transmission line to the Dieng Sub-station. The GPGP will additionally strengthen GDE’s capacity to plan for, develop, and operate geothermal power plants and enhancement of GDE’s Community Development Program through more strategic engagement with the communities and evaluation of program. 3. Scope of the Resettlement Impacts. The RP will cover two sub-project components that will require land acquisition and land clearing, resulting in involuntary resettlement impacts. The expansion of the existing Dieng Geothermal Plant will require a total of 30.83 ha. Of this, 30.53 ha of land is already owned by PT Geo Dipa Energi (GDE) Dieng, while the remaining 3,010 m2 is privately owned land. This will be required for a 10 m wide and approximately 310 m long corridor to serve as the Right-of-Way (ROW) the construction of a new pipeline and access road from Wellpad 9 to the proposed site of the Dieng-2 power plant. 4. The inventory of loss (IOL) census carried out over 14 - 28 August 2019 documented approximately 4 ha of land owned by GDE earmarked for construction of the Dieng-2 power plant that has been leased to a farmer group4 . Most of the other GDE-owned land identified for construction of sub-project components are unencumbered except for 1 small plot of land (471 m2) in the new pipeline ROW,5 which is being cultivated by one farmer encroaching GDE’s land. Land acquisition and cessation of activities on land currently owned by GDE identified for Dieng-2 development will directly affect 106 persons (29 households) and indirectly affect 4 lease coordinators (21 persons). All AHs reside in the village of Karang Tengah, (Kecamatan Batur, Kabupaten Banjarnegara). No relocation will be required. However, many (24) of the affected households will experience severe impacts (i.e. lose 10% or more of access to productive land and/or income). 14 affected households are also categorized as vulnerable6. The data may change following the detailed measurement survey (DMS) based on the final engineering design. Project changes resulting in changes to resettlement impacts will be included in an updated RP. 5. Socio-economic Context in Dieng. Agriculture, particularly potato farming is the main source of income in the Dieng area, including in Karang Tengah Village. Farmers also plant

2 Capacity values in this document refer to net generating capacity 3 ADB. 2019. Proposed Loan and Administration of Technical Assistance Grant. PT Geodipa Energi: Geothermal Power

Generation Project) Guaranteed by the Republic of Indonesia). Project Concept Paper, February 2019. 4 Comprising 23 members and 4 coordinators. 5 Between Wellpad 10 and Wellpad 7 6 Affected vulnerable households are those classified as households headed by women, elderly, or disabled, (ii)

households falling under the generally accepted indicator for poverty, (iii) landless households, and (iv) ethnic minorities.

2

temperate vegetables and some fruits (carica7 and terung belanda8). Potatoes were a boom crop between 1980 – 2000. Extensive and intensive potato farming practices have contributed to a high level of soil erosion and decline in soil fertility. Over the last 20 years, productivity has been declining and cost of production (agro-chemical inputs) increasing. Farmers are increasingly in debt. Weaker and less competitive farmers are losing their farms (sold to settle debt) and being forced into the labour market or migrating out of Dieng.

6. Socio-economic Profile of AHs. A socio-economic survey (SES) of 28 households potentially affected by the Dieng-2 sub-project was carried out over 22 - 23 April and 14 - 23 August 2019. Educational attainment between the two genders is similar. About 12.7% of AH members have not had a formal education, while about 53 % have completed primary education, and 28 % have completed secondary and vocational education. There are 3 university graduates among the AH members, two or whom are female. 11 out of 28 AHs are landless and 10 AHs own less than a quarter ha of productive land. Only 4 AHs own between 0.51 – 0.75 ha of land, while one AH owns more than 5 ha of productive land. Four out of 17 landed AHs possess land certificates. All 6 land owners whose lands to be acquired by the project have “Letter C” village-level documentation of land ownerhip. AHs’ monthly incomes range from Rp. 500,000 – Rp. 19.5 million. One AH has a monthly household income of approximately Rp. 200 million while another is in debt due to 2 consecutive failed harvests. Four wives of AHs were documented as having their own sources of income and contributing to household income. The women’s monthly income ranged from Rp. 120,000 – Rp. 3 million. Two earned incomes by working as farm labour, one earned income from a home industry, and one ran a small fertilizer business. 7. While Dieng Kulon and some other locations are benefiting from the growth of the tourism industry, the sector is not as popular in Karang Tengah Village. In general, heads of households and their wives are only familiar with potato and vegetable farming, and not keen to adopt alternative livelihood activities. The younger AH members are more open to new activities. The main source of water for consumption and other needs are water bodies (Telaga Merdada, Telaga Siterus, Telaga Pawuhan) and mountain springs (Gunung Prau). All households are connected to electricity supply. Most AHs use gas for cooking although there are still 5 AHs who use firewood. All homes have bathrooms and basic toilet facilities. Garbage disposal is a problem in Karang Tengah Village. 8. Gender Issues and Vulnerability. The gender strategy has been included in the RP. Women have been and will be involved in the consultations. Socio economic survey considers gender and women will be included in the GRM committee. One of four FGDs consulting AHs regarding income restoration strategy preferences was designated exclusively for women, while the FGD conducted for youth also included women. Among the 28 AHs, 4 are deemed elderly (have difficulty with daily work because of old age) and 11 are landless. Four of the AHs are considered poor. In total, 14 AHs (47 APs) are vulnerable. There is no female headed households or widows among the 28 AHs. None of the AHs are disabled. All AHs are Javanese; there are no customary minorities. When vulnerability data is combined with potentially severe impacts, all 14 of the vulnerable households are also potentially vulnerable to severe impacts and at risk of impoverishment. Special attention will be given to them, as well as others who may be potentially severely affected to ensure that they are able to continue their current potato farming-based livelihoods and maintain, if not improve their current levels of income.

7 A genus (the type of the family Caricaceae) of chiefly tropical American trees that includes the papaya (Merriam-

Webster dictionary) 8 Batavica eggplant (on-line Indonesian-Latin translation).

3

9. AHs’ Perception of the proposed Dieng-2 sub-project. While many AHs did not have comments, more AHs feel that the sub-project will results in negative impacts (12/28) rather than benefits (6/28). More AHs do not support the sub-project (17/28) compared to those who do (7/28). The reasons given were: (i) loss of income (9/28); (ii) proposed power plant proximity to the residental area (7/28); (iii) perceived damage to homes (roofs) and crops (fear recurrence of previous incident (4/28).

10. Communications and Complaints. AHs preferred project communications to be conducted at village meetings (14/28),or conveyed via the Village Head and/or religious leaders (11/28). With respect to complaints, 14/28 AHs said that they would seek information or submit complaints to the village head, or via the lease coordinators (11/28) or deliver directly to Geodipa Dieng (2). AHs are more familiar with communicating their queries or complaints verbally. If they were to be dissatisfied with how their complaints have been handled, they will follow-up through the lease coordinator (11/28) or Village Head (7/28). 11. Consultation and Disclosure. A series of consultations has been conducted for the preparation of the RP. The first consultations with the APs, affected communities and stakeholders (local NGOs, Kabupaten agency representatves) were held in March 2019 at village offices. A total of 209 persons (163 men, 46 women) participated in the consultations. Consultations continued during the IOL and SES when focus group discussions (FGDs) were conducted with 77 persons (49 men, 28 women) to assess and discuss the resettlement impacts and possible income and livelihood restoration programs to mitigate the impacts (loss of land, loss of arable land). The second set of community consultations was held over 11-13 September 2019 at village offices. 178 participants (126 man, 52 women) attended the consultations. The consultations were to seek feedback on the assesment findings and proposed mitigation measures. The consultations will continue during the project implementation. A meaningful consultation plan has been prepared to ensure participation of APs and stakeholders at project planning, implementation, and monitoring. Participation of women and vulnerable groups will be ensured. A summary of the RP and any updated RP in the form of a Project Information Booklet or leaflets in Bahasa Indonesia will be distributed to the APs and made available at the GDE Dieng Office. 12. Grievance Redress Mechanism. A grievance mechanism has been established to receive, investigate and respond in timely manner to any complaints or grievances raised by APs. A Grievance Focal Person will be designated at the Dieng Unit office to manage the GRM. GDE has already discussed the GRM during the consultations (sosialisasi) with the APs and will disclose the information through distribution of leaflets. 13. Legal Framework. This Resettlement Plan (RP) was prepared in accordance with Government of Indonesia (GOI) laws, regulations and policies related to land acquisition and involuntary resettlement, Relevant Standard Operating Procedures of PT Geo Dipa Energi (GDE) as well as the Involuntary Resettlement of Safeguard Policy Statement of ADB (SPS 2009). The main legal framework used as the reference for land acquisition and involuntary resettlement includes: (i) Law No. 2/2012 on Land Acquisition for Development in the Public Interest and its implementing regulations, (ii) Presidential Regulation No. 62/2018 concerning Handling Social Impact for Providing Land for National Development Projects; and (iii) ADB SPS 2009. The objectives of the Project resettlement policy are to avoid, or minimize if avoidane is not possible), involuntary resettlement impacts, mitigate and compensate adverse impacts, restore livelihoods, and improve the living standards of the vulnerable households. As per government regulation, acquisition of land for the construction of the new pipeline and access road will be undertaken either through negotiated land acquisition or direct purchase.

4

14. Entitlements and Compensation. Landowners will be entitled to compensation based independent appraisal by the Office of Public Appraisal (KJPP - Kantor Jasa Pinalai Publik) and negotiations. Land users (croppers) will be entitled to get cash compensation for loss of crops income equivalent to a minumum of one year of net product market value based on independent appraisal by the KJPP. Both landowners and land users will be provided with 3 months advance notice prior to vacating the land to be acquired or cleared. Landowners and land users will be allowed to harvest their last crop before vacating the land.

15. Income and Livelihood Restoration Programs. Income and livelihood restoration will be provided to severely APs and vulnerable APs to ensure their living standard will not be worse off due to the project. The Inventory of Losses (IOL) and Social-Economic Survey (SES) found that there are 24 potentially severely affected households (86 persons) and 14 vulnerable households 9 (47 persons). The programs include opportunity of employment during construction, vocational training, and scholarships, procurement of equipment and materials, and capacity building for the improvement of their current micro-enterprises / businesses. The activities will be implemented over a period of three years after compensation payment and during construction and will be monitored and reported on bi-annually to ensure effective restoration of livelihoods and program sustainability. The income and livelihood restoration program will also be expanded to the APs affected temporarily during construction and residents living near to project areas as project benefits. Approximately 134 households will participate in the program. The Livelihood Restoration Assessment also recommended some activities to reorient the Community Development (ComDev) program so as to be more strategic and responsive to the political-economic dynamics and existing livelihood security challenges within the Dieng economy. 16. Resettlement Budget and Financing Plan. A budget of IDR 21,351 billion (approximately US$ 1,503,592) has been estimated for land acquisition and involuntary resettlement as well as a reoriented Community Development program. The budget includes: (i) costs for compensation, (ii) income and livelihood restoration, (iii) ComDev reorientation program, (iv) monitoring, (v) administrative costs. A 10% contingency margin was included. GDE will ensure timely funds disbursement and will prepare all the necessary plans. 17. Institutional Arrangements. GDE is the Executing Agency of the project, responsible for overall coordination, policy directions, and administration, including those related to land acquisistion and involuntary resettlement safeguard. A Project Management Unit (PMU) has been established to manage the GPGP. The PMU will have a Government Relation and Social Safeguards Assitant Manager responsible for social safeguards monitoring and compliance, support for land acquisition activities (in coordination with general affairs (GA) division), and programiing and budgeting livelihood restoration and ComDev activities in coordination with Corporate Secretariat (CORSEC). At the GDE Dieng Unit level, the Social Safeguards and PR supervisors will be responsible for supporting land acquisition and involuntary resettlement activities and social safeguards compliance. Social safeguard consultants under the Project Management Consultant will support the PMU in managing and monitoring social safeguards.

18. Implementation Schedule. Land clearing activities (on GDE-owned land) will commence in November 2019 and be completed by February 2020. Land acquisition activities will commence in January 2020 and be completed by end of October 2020. A Land Acquisition Team (LAT) will be established by January 2020. Land compensation negotiations are expected by July – August

9 All vulnerable households will also be potentially severely affected.

5

2020. The implementation of livelihood restoration activities will commence in FY 2020. Land clearing activities are expected to commence by the first quarter of 2020. The Dieng-2 power plant and pipeline construction will commence in the first quarter of 2021 and will be commissioned by the third quarter of 2023. 19. Monitoring and Reporting. Internal monitoring will be undertaken by the PMU, assisted by the PMC, throughout the land acquisition and involuntary resettlement process. Semi-annual monitoring reports will be prepared during project implementation to report the progress of all activities in the RP, including those related to land acquisition and involuntary resettlement. An indepdent monitoring agency will be engaged by PMU to carry out land acquisition and resettlement external monitoring and post- implementation evaluation.

6

VII. INTRODUCTION

A. Background

1. The Republic of Indonesia has the world’s largest geothermal potential, estimated at 29,000 MW. Since the issuance of the Geothermal Law in 2003, the Government of Indonesia (GOI) has prioritized development of this resource. As of January 2019, the installed capacity of geothermal energy in Indonesia was 1,948.5 MW (6.72 % of total potential). In the RUPTL10, the government plans for an additional 4,443 MW of installed geothermal capacity by 202711. The government also intends for state-owned enterprises, such as PT PLN (Perusahaan Listrik Negara – State Electricity Company) and PT Geo Dipa Energi, to play an important role for sustaining geothermal growth in the near term. 2. PT Geo Dipa Energi (GDE) is a state-owned geothermal company focused on exploration and development of geothermal resources. GDE currently operates a 55 MW power plant at Dieng in Central Java which was transferred to GDE after commissioning and after drilling. In the near term, GDE plans to commission an additional unit at Dieng, which is proposed to be financed under the Geothermal Power Generation Project (GPGP) (Project). 3. The Asian Development Bank (ADB) will provide a loan to GDE to support expanded geothermal electricity generation in Java to increase renewable energy baseload and reduce Indonesia’s reliance on coal. The proposed GPGP will provide financing for expanding geothermal power generation via the Dieng-2 sub-project – expansion of geothermal electric generating capacity by 55 MW at the existing Dieng Geothermal Plant.

B. Sub-Project Description

4. The Sub-project will construct a new power plant, sub-station, transmission lines and pipelines. No new well pads will be added, but 10 new wells 12 will be drilled on existing wellpads. Table 2-1 provides a list of Dieng-2 components to be added to the existing Dieng-1 Geothermal Plant facilities. The sub-project will include (a) drilling of new wells for geothermal fluid production and re-injection, (b) construction of fluid collection and re-injection systems, (c) power plant, and (d) transmission inter-connection systems. strengthen GDE’s capacity to plan for, develop, and operate geothermal power plants and enhancement of GDE’s Community Development Program through more strategic engagement with the communities and evaluation of program.

10 Rencana Usaha Penyediaan Tenaga Listrik (RUPTL) 2018–2027 (Electricity Power Supply Business Plan 2018–

2027). 11 An increase of 15.32 % vis a vis total potential. 12 4 production wells, 5 injection well and 1 contingency well

7

7

5. The Dieng sub-project faces technical challenges and high-density of farming activities at the Dieng reservoir location. As part of ADB’s assistance, the project will enhance health, safety, emergency planning, and livelihood opportunities for nearby communities. The Dieng-2 sub-project will not use any forest land except for laying of the proposed underground transmission line which will pass under an existing pipeline and inspection road right-of-way (ROW) through protection forest, for which PT Geo Dipa already has a permit (IPPKH). These activities will serve as an example for how Indonesia’s geothermal resource in similar geographic contexts can be developed without detriment to the existing surroundings.

6. Figure 2-1 provides a map of the location and- layout of the proposed Dieng-2 expansion components recommended by the Dieng and Patuha Feasibility Study approved by the GDE Board of Directors per August 2019). Figure 1. Proposed Dieng Geothermal Plant Expansion Components – Power Plant, new wells (in existing wellpads), SAGS (new pipeline alignment within existing pipeline and inspection roads ROW)

7. Figure 2-2 provides a Google Earth map overlaid with the underground transmission line alignment route recommended by the subsequent Transmission Line Feasibility Study of September 2019.

8

Figure 2. Adjusted Transmission Line Route From Dieng 1 Substation to Dieng 2 Power Plant

9

9

VIII. SCOPE OF LAND ACQUISITION AND RESETTLEMENT

A. Land Requirements

8. Approximately 308,289 m2 (30.8 ha) of land will be required for the Dieng-2 sub-project. Of this, 305,279 m2 is already owned by GDE and 3,010 m2 privately owned land will be acquired. Table 1 below provides the land acquisition needs for the Dieng-2 sub-project. Land required for the power plant site (Dieng 2) and all 5 well-pads in which 10 new wells will be drilled is already owned by GDE. So is most of the land required for constructing new pipelines and an access road. Approximately 3,010 m2 of additional (privately-owned) land will need to be acquired for a new pipeline and inspection road ROW connecting Wellpad 9 to the Dieng-2 power plant site.

B. Due Diligence concerning land owned / leased by Geo Dipa

9. Of the 30.83 ha of land required for the Dieng-2 expansion sub-project, 99 % is already owned by GDE. The status of land certification for the above land is provided in Appendix 1. However, the certification process has not been completed for all parcels of land owned or leased by GDE.

(i) Out of 45 pieces of land with separate titles, certificates for 20 pieces of land are still being processed. GDE General Affairs Division estimates that the certification process in the case of 16 parcels of land will be completed by the end of 2019.

(ii) The certification process for the remaining 4 pieces of land is expected to be completed by end 2020. (These 4 certificates relate to Wellpad 10, a segment of the ROW between Wellpad 30 and 31, and a segment of the ROW under which the underground transmission lines will pass.

(iii) All certificates of GDE land use rights (HGB) status is valid until between 2034 – 2048. However, there is one HGB certificate which is valid until 2024. This certificate is for a segment of existing ROW in the Sikunang area through which the underground transmission lines will pass.

10

Table 1. Project Components and Land Requirements for the Proposed Dieng Geothermal Power Plant Expansion

NO INFRASTRUCTURE

COMPONENT

LOCATION OWNER OF LAND

REQUIRED AREA # IR IMPACTS (YES/NO)

LOCATION

WELL VILLAGE LENGTH

(M) WIDTH

(M) AREA (M2)

1 Power Plant (Dieng-2)

Well 38 Karang Tengah

GDE +.58,479*

Yes 23 AHs (land users)

2 Underground Transmission Line

4 villages - Karang Tengah,

Dieng Kulon, Bakal and Sikunang13

GDE + 6,000 2 + 12,000 No Area required will be existing pipeline ROW owned by GDE. The TL will across provincial road

GDE No Under existing inspection road and pipeline and inspection road ROW.

Near sub-station

Sikunang Min. of Forestry

No

3 Sub-station Sikunang GDE No Will use existing Dieng 1

4 Well pads Pad7 SLR-7D Karang Tengah

GDE ±13,900 No

Pad9 SLR-9C,

9D, 9E, 9F

Karang Tengah

GDE ±8,500 No

Pad10 HCE-

10A Kepakisan GDE ±22,100 No

Reactivation of old well. Loc-O SLR-

30B Karang Tengah

GDE ±30,200 No

Loc-Q SLR-

31A, 31B

Karang Tengah

GDE ±41,100 No

5 Pipeline & access road

Pad10 to Pad 7

Kepakisan 14 / Karang Tengah

GDE

±34,000 No GDE ROW split by Village Road – 4 m wide on either side of existing road.

13 Desa Karang Tengah, Dieng Kulon, and Bakal are located in Kecamatan Batur, Kabupaten Banjarnegara, whereas Desa Sikunang is in Kecamatan Kejajar,

Kabupaten Wonosobo. 14 Desa Kepakisan is in Kecamatan Batur, Kabupaten Banjarnegara.

11

11

NO INFRASTRUCTURE

COMPONENT

LOCATION OWNER OF LAND

REQUIRED AREA # IR IMPACTS (YES/NO)

LOCATION

WELL VILLAGE LENGTH

(M) WIDTH

(M) AREA (M2)

Pad 7 to

Pad 9 Karang

Tengah GDE ±25,900 No

COI = existing ROW 12 m,

Pad 9 to Dieng-2 PP

Karang Tengah

Private 10 +3,010 * Yes Land acquisition required (6 land owners).

Triple

junction to pad Q

Karang Tengah

GDE ±28,100 No COI = existing ROW 12 m

Loc-Q to

Loc-O Karang

Tengah GDE ±31,000 No

COI = existing ROW 12 m TOTAL + 308.289

Notes: # Breakdown – owned by GDE (±305,279 m2 of which the TL will be under 12,000 m2 - 6 km long, 2 m wide), privately owned (3,010 m2) * Based on field survey by IOL team (16 Aug. 2019)

12

10. Protected Forest Land Lease. Some of the GDE-owned land is located in protected forest (hutan lindung) (see details in Table 2-1 and Appendix 1). Based on the documentation in Appendix 1, only 3 parcels out of the above-mentioned 45 parcels of land are in protected forest area. The necessary permits (IPPKHs) were obtained for all three parcels in 2013; the permits are valid until 2037.

11. Encroachment of ROW as a result of Road Upgrading. The field investigation of the status of existing pipeline and inspection road ROWs to be used for installation of new pipelines conducted over 5-6 August 2019 found that in GDE does not own an intact ROW between Wellpad 10 and Wellpad 7. Before land for the ROW was acquired, a 4 m wide village road existed leading past Wellpad 10. GDE acquired 4 m of land on either side of the village road which serves as the ROW. However, the road is in the process of being widened to 6 m wide provincial road status. The road widening has encroached on the GDE ROW. GDE will write to the Provincial Public Works Department (Bina Marga, Dinas PU Propinsi Jawa Tengah) to take remedial action.

12. Underground Transmission Line crosses the Provincial Road. The proposed transmission line (per Figure 2-2) exits the proposed Dieng-2 power plant site and crosses the provincial road to join the proposed new pipeline and access road ROW between the power plant and Wellpad 9. From this point, the transmission line will be laid under the existing GDE owned ROW all the way to the sub-station. Laying of the underground transmission line along new and existing ROW to the existing sub-station will involve digging / laying of underground cables across the provincial road. This will cause temporary inconvenience to traffic (1-2 weeks). GDE will communicate with the Provincial Public Works (Bina Marga) in order to obtain the permit for the crossing and provide a temporary solution.

13. GDE owned Land Rented to a Tenant Farmer. Approximately 4 ha of the 5.7 ha “Mess GDE” site earmarked for construction of the Dieng-2 Power Plant is currently being leased by KODIPA (GDE’s cooperative) to a farmers group (Kelompok Sadar Alam dan Tani Merdada Sejahtera) via the groups’s head coordinator15 . The lease is renewed on an annual basis. Appendix 2 presents a copy of the current lease (and receipt) for period 2018-2019, valid until October 2019.

C. Inventory of Losses (IOL)

14. Methodology. The IOL was conducted over 22-23 April and 14 – 28 August 2019. The first stage of the IOL was carried out in 22 – 23 April 2019 at the site commonly referred to as “mess GDE” which was already fixed as the site for the Dieng-2 power plant. The land is approximately 5.7 ha in size. There are some buildings on the land owned by GDE and no people use these buildings. The IOL was based on a mapping conducted with some of the tenant farmers and coordinators followed by interviews with the 23 tenant farmers.16 The data derived from the (IOL) may need to be updated through detailed measurement survey (DMS) following the final engineering design and corridor of impacts carried out at the implementation stage of land acquisition.

15. Following the final Feasibility Study (FS) results officially released on 8 August 2019, the second stage of the IOL was conducted over 14 – 28 August 2019 and covered the following:

(i) Mapping of all existing GDE land components where Dieng-2 sub-project components would be constructed. (See Figure 1 and Table 1.) This included:

15 There are 4 coordinators. 16 The interviews were conducted at the house of the head of the 4 coordinators.

13

13

a. Wellpads 10, 7, 9, 30 and 31; b. existing pipeline and inspection road right-of-way (ROW) connecting the above

wellpads to the proposed Dieng-2 power plant; c. the Dieng-2 Power Plant site itself; and d. Underground transmission line route from the Dieng-2 power plant site, along new

and existing pipeline and inspection road ROWs all to way to the existing sub-station (approximately 6 km).

The purpose of this exercise was to ensure that there was sufficient space for positioning of proposed Dieng-2 components.

(ii) Measurement and mapping of the only land to be acquired – a 3,010 m2 corridor between Wellpad 9 and the proposed site of the Dieng-2 power plant.

(iii) Confirmation of measurements and mapping of GDE land leased to 23 tenant farmers. Identification of landowners and land-users (tenant farmers/renters, croppers), and IOL of all affected crops in the 3,010 m2 corridor to be acquired. Appendix 3 provides the format of the IOL questionnaire.

D. Scope of Impacts

16. Existing GDE-owned land that will be used for the Dieng-2 sub-project. The IOL produced a set of maps of existing GDE-owned land that will be used for the Dieng-2 sub-project.17 Figure 3-1 presents an alignment map for sub-project components overlaid on a google earth photo produced by the IOL survey. The IOL indicates that the existing ROW of pipe lines is sufficient for the construction of the new pipelines for Dieng 2 sub project. 17. Loss of Private Land. A total of 3,010 m2 of land owned by 6 AHs (27 APs) to be acquired for the construction of a new pipeline and access road ROW. It consists of 6 land plots with legal land rights (Letter C). The land is in Karang Tengah Village. All landowners are residents of Karang Tengah Village. Appendix 4 presents a map of the 6 land plots. While the village records were not sighed by the IOL team, the Village Head provided an affidavit confirming land ownership status of the 6 plots of land (See Appendix 5). The land is productive land cultivated under potatoes and temperate vegetables (cabbage, carrots, and leeks). Based on consultations with the landowners on 23 August 2019, landowners asked for time to decide whether they would be willing to sell their land. GDE Dieng Unit staff/ GDE LAT will follow-up to obtain their answer (in principle). If the landowners decide against selling, or if they are agreeable but negotiations are not successful, the route of the corridor will be adjusted.

18. Loss of Arable Land use by tenant famers. A total of 5.7 ha GDE-owned land (ex Mess GDE site) will be cleared for the project. This site is located in Karang Tengah Village. This will affect the Kelompok Sadar Alam dan Tani Merdada Sejahtera farmer group which comprises 23 tenant farmers18 (85 household members or APs), all of whom reside in Karang Tengah Village. Appendix 6 presents a lay-out map of the individual plots of land leased to 23 tenant farmers (land users or croppers). A list of the size of plots leased by each tenant farmer is provided in Appendix 7.

17 The maps include; (i) overall alignment map; (ii) an index map; (iii) a set of 18 maps of existing pipeline and access /

inspection road ROWs; (iv) maps of 5 wellpads (7, 9, 10, 30 and 30 and 31); (v) map of proposed land acquisition corridor between Wellpad 9 and the proposed Dieng-2 power plant site; (vi) map of the proposed Dieng-2 power plant site (ex Mess GDE) showing plots of each of the 23 tenant farmers; (vii) map of area encroached by one cropper.

18 One of the tenant farmers is also one of the landowners of land to be acquired for the construction of a new pipeline and access road ROW. His household consists of 6 persons. His household members have been counted under his category as landowner.

14

19. There is one land user (penggarap) cultivating GDE-owned land between Wellpad 10 to Wellpad 7. Appendix 8 provides a map on approximately 471 m2 of land the land user has occupied.19 . A total number of 29 households comprising 103 people (household members) 20 will be potentially affected by land acquisition and land clearing activities (see Table 1).

Figure 3. Map of the Dieng-2 Sub-project

19 The cropper was not available (he was out of the country performing the Hajj) when the IOL and SES was carried out The Village Head requested the survey team not to approach his wife but to wait until he had returned before interviewing him. No household data was collected. However, the team was informed that he was prosperous (not vulnerable, and not potentially severely affected). 20 Excluding the cropper who was not covered by SES.

15

15

Table 2. Potential number of households affected by land acquisition and land clearingTable 21

Sub-Project Component

Land Ownership

Status

No. Of Households Affected By Land Acquisition / Land

Clearing

Notes

New wells to be drilled in existing Wellpads 10, 7, 9, 30 and 31

GDE None

The well sites are already clear. Well drilling with a drilling rig will use water-based material. There will be well testing The IOL found none will be affected by the sub-project. There are 5 croppers using GDEs land near Wellpad 31 (Loc Q), but they are outside of the corridor of impacts.

New pipelines to be installed / constructed in existing pipeline and inspection road ROWs between wellpads

GDE 1 AH

1 cropper on GDE land The ROW for most of the existing pipelines and inspection roads are 12 m or more in width. They are well maintained. There will be no need for land clearing in the case of most of the ROWs, except for the ROW from Wellpad 10 to Wellpad 7 that will affect approximately 471 m2 of land cultivated with potatoes/vegetables by 1 AH. The cropper has assured GDE Dieng that he will vacate the land when GDE wants to use it

New pipeline and inspection road from Wellpad 9 to Dieng -2 power plant site

Privately owned

6 land owners

A corridor of land (3,010 m2) will be acquired as the ROW for a new pipeline and inspection road connecting Wellpad 9 to the Dieng-2 power plant site. Land will be cleared after ownership of the land has been relinquished by the landowners in favor of GDE Dieng.

New underground transmission line route from Dieng-2 power plant site to existing sub-station

GDE None identified

The transmission line will exit the proposed Dieng-2 Power Plant site and cross a provincial road before joining a new GDE owned corridor / new pipeline and inspection road ROW (to be acquired).

Dieng-2 Power Plant site (Mess GDE)

GDE

23 tenant farmers (one of whom is one

of the above land owners);

4 co-ordinators of the farmer group.

About 4 ha of the site has been leased on an annual basis to a farmers’ group -Kelompok Sadar Alam dan Tani “Merdada Sejahtera” over the last 20 years. 23 tenant farmers will lose access to productive arable land which they have been leasing for between 10-20 years. 22 of the tenants farmers will be severely affected. 14 of these farmers are also considered vulnerable. The current land lease between the KODIPA (GDE Cooperative) and the head of the 4 coordinators on behalf the farmer group (Kelompok Sadar Alam dan Tani Merdada Sejahtera) will expire in October 2019. KODIPA will not extend the lease. However, GDE/KODIPA will allow the farmer group to continue using the land until end of January 2020, The land is scheduled to be cleared in

21 While land acquisition refers to land to be purchased and ownership surrendered by land owners to GDE, land

clearing refers to GDE-owned land that needs to be vacated by land users (tenant famers, or farmers cultivating GDE-owned land without permission) before it can be cleared for construction activities

16

Sub-Project Component

Land Ownership

Status

No. Of Households Affected By Land Acquisition / Land

Clearing

Notes

Feburary 2020, and construction activities are scheduled to commence by March 2020. The coordinators themselves do not cultivate any of the GDE land. They are not vulnerable. GDE will provide employment opportunity to the coordinators and acces to livelihood restoration programs.

20. Loss of cultivated seasonal Crops (vegetables). All farmers were cultivating potatoes and vegetables during the period of the IOL. There is 43,735 m2 of crop land that will be needed for the project (mostly potatoes), of which 40,725 m2 is owned by 23 tenant farmers and sharecroppers using GDE’s land and 3,010 m2 of which is privately owned by 6 different people. GDE agreed to give 4-6 months’ notice before land ownership has to be relinquished to GDE and will allow all land- owners and land users to harvest their crops before handing over. 21. Loss of Structure. No structures will be affected. 22. Severely Affected Households. The IOL found that a total of 24 AHs (86 APs) will potentially be severely affected by the sub-project consisting of 22 severely AHs due to land clearing and 2 severely AHs due to land acquisition. Detailed data on severity is outlined in the Table 3 below.

Table 3. Severely Affected Households

STATUS No. of AHs

Will potentially lose 10 – 25 % of productive land or total income 4 Will potentially lose 26 – 50 % of productive land or total income 5 Will potentially lose 51 – 75 % of productive land or total income 6 Will potentially lose 76 – 100% of productive land or total income 9 TOTAL 24

23. Vulnerable Households. Out of 28 affected households who were coverd by the SES, there are 14 households (comprising 47 household members) who are considered vulnerable. All 14 vulnerable households belong to the group of 23 tenant farmers (who would be affected by land clearing). None of 6 land owners (to be affected by land acquisition) is considered vulnerable. Among 14 vulnerable households, 4 households (14.3 %) are considered poor (based on Kabupaten Banjarnegara’s poverty line of Rp. 278,210 per capita / month for 2017), 4 households (14.3%) are elderly (not able to cope with daily work due to old age) and 14 households (50%) are landless. These categories are not mutually exclusive. See Table 4. There are no female-headed households or widows among the 28 AHs. None of the AHs are disabled. All AHs are ethnically Javanese; there are no ethnic minorities.

Table 4. Vulnerable Affected Households

Type / Combination Of Vulnerability Categories

No. of Tenant Farmer AHs (APs)

No. of Land Owning AHs (APs)

Total no. of AHs (APs)

Poor 2 (9) 0 2 (9) Poor* and landless 2 (9) 0 2 (9)

17

17

Type / Combination Of Vulnerability Categories

No. of Tenant Farmer AHs (APs)

No. of Land Owning AHs (APs)

Total no. of AHs (APs)

Elderly 1 (2) 0 1 (2) Elderly and landless 3 (7) 0 3 (7) Landless 6 (20) 0 6 (20) Total 14 (47) 0** 14 (47) * Based on Kabupaten Banjarnegara poverty line of Rp. 278.210 per capita/month 2017) ** However, there are 2 land owning AHs with 8 household members (potentially affected by land acquisition) who could be considered severely affected.

24. Appendix 9 combines severity of impacts and vulnerability data. 24 out of 28 AHs (85.7%) are severely affected and/or vulnerable. All 14 of the vulnerable households are also potentially vulnerable to severe impacts and at risk of impoverishment. Special attention should be given to them, as well as others who may be potentially severely affected. A summary of impacts due to land acquisition and land clearing is provided in Table 5.

Table 5. Summary of Impacts due to Land Acquisition and Land Clearing

Total land Requirements

Land owned by GDE 305,279 m2 (or 30.53 ha)22 Privately owned land 3,010 m2 Sub-Total 308,289 m2 Total amount of affected crops (only seasonal crops will be affected) Predominantly potatoes with some temperate vegetables 43,735 m 2

▪ crops cultivated by land owners 3,010 m2

▪ crops culitaveted by land users 40,725 m 2

Total number of people affected Number of affected land owners 5 households: 21 persons (HH members)

Number of land owners and also land users (tenant farmers) 1 household: 6 persons (HH members) Number of affected land users 23 households: 79 persons (HH members) Lease coordinator (indirect impact) 4 households: 21 persons (HH members) Total number of severely affected people (lose >10% of productive land or >10% of income source)

24 households: 86 persons (HH members)

Total number of vulnerable people 14 households: 47 persons (HH members)

▪ Number of poor households 23 2 HH: 9 persons (HH membes)

▪ Number of poor and landless households. 2 HH: (9 household members)

▪ Number of elderly headed households (cannot cope with daily work). 24

1 HH: (2 household members)

▪ Number of elderly and landless households 3 HH: (7 household members)

▪ Number of landless households 25 6 HH: (20 household members)

No. of other forms of income activities affected No. of small businesses (kiosks, warung etc.) and other forms of income generating activities affected.

-

22 Of which approximately 6 ha is existing pipeline and inspection road ROW under which the TL cable will be buried. 23 Per capita income/month below Kab. Banjarnegara poverty line for Rp. 278,210 for 2017. 24 Total no. of elderly households is 4 of whom 3 HH are also landless. 25 Total no. of landless househodls is 14 of whom 3 are also poor, and 3 are also elderly.

18

IX. SOCIO-ECONOMIC PROFILE AND PERCEPTIONS OF AFFECTED PEOPLE 25. This section presents a summary of the socio-economic information of the area and people who will be potentially affected by the land acquisition and land clearing process. General demographic data is presented for the Village of Karang Tengah. More detailed information was gathered from a census of the impacted landowners and users of acquired land, as well as a group of farmers currently leasing GDE land.

A. Profile of Karang Tengah Appendix 10 presents a description of Karang Tengah Village. Table 6 provides a summary profile.

Table 6. Profile of Karang Tengah Village

VILLAGE STATISTICS

Size of Village territory (wilayah desa) 488,811 Ha Elevation above sea level 2,081 m Average daily temperature

15◦ C

Land Use:

▪ Dry land agriculture 250,831 Ha (51.3 %) ▪ Settlements 190,402 Ha (39 %) ▪ Home Gardens 2,331 Ha (0.5 %) ▪ Water bodies 20 Ha ▪ Village land (for cash) 28,138 Ha (5.8 %) ▪ Public Facilities 6 Ha ▪ Forest 9 Ha ▪ Total (488,811 Ha)

Number of Village Govt. personnel 11 Number of hamlets (dusun) 3 Number of tourist attractions (obyek wisata) 1 Number of homestays 5 Total population 4,992 people Breakdown by gender 2,513 male,

2,479 female Total number of households 1.400 HH Number of people within productive age bracket (19 – 55 years of age)

56 %

Dependency ratio 26 48.8% Proportion of education who have completed schooling / education

65.9 %

▪ proportion who have completed primary education only (SD)

52 %

▪ proportion who have completed lower secondary school (SLTP)

7.8 %

▪ proportion who have completed upper secondary school (SLTA)

5 %

▪ Diploma IV (Strata I) (35 people) 0.7 % ▪ Diploma I / II (11 people) 0.22 % ▪ Academy / Diploma III / Graduate (Sarjana Muda) (37 people) 0.74 % ▪ Did not complete basic education (primary school) 22 %

26 (Population within 0-12 years age brackets + population 55 years and above) / (Population within 13 – 55 years of

age brackets) x 100% (based on available data)

19

VILLAGE STATISTICS ▪ No formal education / not yet of school going age 11.4 %

Main sectors of Economy / Income ▪ Agriculture (food / seasonal crops) Rp. 10,000,000,000 (99.55% ) ▪ Agriculture (estate crops) Rp. 5,000,000

(0.05 %) ▪ Trade Rp. 31,200,000

(0.31%) ▪ Services Rp. 6,000,000

(0.06 %) ▪ Home-stay Rp. 3,000,000

(0.03 %) Number of Ojek (motorcycle taxis) in village 17 Welfare

▪ Well off (Sejahtera 3+) n/a ▪ Poor (Pra-sejahtera) 305 HH ▪ Poor (Pra-sejahtera 1) 150 HH ▪ Very Poor (Pra-sejahtera 2) 153 HH ▪ Very Poor (Pra-sejahtera 3) n/a

Types of social organisations present – women’s groups, youth, professional. men’s group, LP3M, Self-help groups, Traditional groups

Women’s Organization’s (PKK) Programs – active

B. Summary of Socio-economic Survey Findings

26. The Socio-economic (SES) was conducted for all 28 AHs27, and in accordance with the gender strategy - 14 of affected heads of households (male), and 14 female AH members (50%, all wives of household heads) were interviewed. Each AH was represented by one respondent. This chapter presents a concise version of SES results. SES instruments are provided in Appendix 10. SES methodology and all gender-disaggregated tables of data are provided in Appendix 11. 27. Education. Educational attainment of 28 respondents is presented in Figure 4. Educational attainment of the wives is relatively higher than that of husbands. The majority (53.6%) have basic (elementary – SD) level education, and 25% have completed upper secondary education (or senior high school - SLTP).

27 The survey was a census of all affected households.

20

Figure 4. Educational Attainment of Respondents

28. Education attainment of 95 AH members is presented in Table 5. 52.6% of affected household members have basic or elementary school education (SD). Some 27.4% have secondary (junior and senior high school) education. There are 2 non-degree holders and 3 degree holders among AH members. Of the 3 University degree holders, 2 are female.

Figure 5. Educational Attainment of Affected Household Members

Note * Information was not collected (answers not provided) in the case of 11 AH members

7.1

35.7

3.6 3.6

7.1

17.9

3.6

21.4

0

10

20

30

40

50

Never attended school Primary or Elementary

School

Lower Secondary School Upper Secondary School

Pe

rce

nta

ge

(%

)

Male Female

6.5

34.4

7.5

3.2 2.2 1.1 1.1

6.5

17.2

6.5

10.8

0 1.1 2.2

0

10

20

30

40

50

Never

attended

school

Primary or

Elementary

School

Lower

Secondary

School

Upper

Secondary

School

Vocational

School

Non-degree University

Pe

rce

nta

ge

(%

)

Male Female

21

29. Economic Profile. Figure 6 presents the primary occupation of household members. Based on the figures for responses from both men and women respondents, it would appear that there are more male household members (51) than female household members (39). Of the 90 APs whose data was collected, 58 (64.4%) are farmers, and 18 (20%) are still attending school. There was only 1 trader (who was a woman). One woman (wife) was documented as a farm worker. Four people said they were retired.

Figure 6. Primary Occupation of AH Members

Note: * Occupations of 15 household members were not documented

30. Dependency Ratio.Table 7 provides data regarding size of AHs. In general, the size of families is less than 5 persons. Table 7 also shows that there are 67 gainfully household members in the 28 AHs – 55.2% of them are male, whereas 44.8% of them are female.

Table 7. Number of Persons Living with the AHs* and Number of Gainfully Employed

Gender of AH Head

Number of persons living with the AH Number of gainfully employed members of the

AH

1 < 5 < 9 9 or

> Male** Female** 1 2 3 4 >4 Male** Female**

Male-headed 0 12 2 0 29 20 2 7 3 2 0 19 13 Female-headed

0 11 3 0 28 26 2 7 1 4 0 18 17

Total 0 23 5 0 57 46 4 14 4 6 0 37 30

31. Figure 7 shows that 85.7 % or 24 AHs have a dependency ratio of 0 – 1 (low dependency), while 14.3% or 4 AHs have high dependency.

Figure 7. Dependency Ratio of AHs

13.5

40.4

0.0 0.02.2 1.1

6.7

23.6

1.1 1.1 2.2

7.9

0

10

20

30

40

50

No, Attending

School

Farmer Trader Farm workers Retired Other

Pe

rce

nta

ge

(%

)

Male Female

22

32. Monthly Household income. 14 male heads of households provided their monthly household incomes from agriculture, whereas only 6 women were able to provide reponses regarding household income. IOL and SES data were combined to generate household incomes for AHs. Complete figures for combined monthly income may be seen in Appendix 9. Figure 8 provides a graphic of household income for 28 AHs. There are four cases where wives have income which they contribute towards household income. Wives’ monthly incomes ranged from Rp. 120,000 to Rp. 3 million.28 Based on the Kabupaten of Banjarnegara’s poverty line of Rp.278,210 for 2018, there are 4 poor households. All poor household belong to the tenant farmer group who cultivate GDE land.

▪ While husbands’ income is primarily from agriculture, with some (40%) also obtaining

income from farm labour, ▪ wives’ incomes were from farm labour, home industry and running a small fertilizer

business.

28 Two of the above women respondents worked as farm labour earning Rp. 30,000/day. Both of them were from households who cultivate land leased from GDE. On the other hand, the two wives who have small scale enterprises belong to the the land owner group.

32.1%

7.1%

7.1%

3.6%

35.7%

3.6% 7.1%

3.6%

Dependency Ratio of HH

DR 0

DR 0.3

DR 0.5

DR 0.7

DR 1

DR 1.5

DR 2

DR 3

23

Figure 8. Combined Monthly Income of 28 AHs (based on combination of SES and IOL

results (from Appendix 9)

33. Monthly household savings. Only four AHs declared they have monthly savings. The amount saved varied from less than Rp. 400,000 to Rp. 4 million. All four AHs who have the habit of saving belong to the tenant farmer group who lease GDE land. Of the four households, three are not classified as vulnerable, while one AH is classified as both poor and landless.

Some Additional SES data to describe overall conditions and issues 34. A number of common community issues were raised during the community consultations conducted in 6 villages in March and September 2019, as well as during consultations with local NGOs conducted on 1 October 2019. These include (i) better access to health services for health screening, (ii) water supply, and particularly access to potable water supply, and (iii) garbage disposal linked to the increase in tourism activity in the area. These parameters were also covered by the SES in relation to AHs who reside in Karang Tengah Village. 35. Location (proximity) of medical services. A health officer (mantri kesehatan) and nurse (bidan) reside in Karang Tengah Village. There is a Health Post (Polindes) in the village of Karang Tengah. Most of AH members make use of the Polindes for minor ailments 29 or make use of the mantri or bidan’s services. For more serious ailments 30, they go to the Puskesmas (Community

29 These include cough and cold/flu, headaches, indigestion, and sprains. 30 These include stroke, heart disease, asthma, bone abnormality and a limp.

3%7%

25%

21%

11%

4%

29%

Combined Monthly Income of AHs (in Rupiah)

<400,000 400,000-poverty line

Above poverty line-2,000,000 2,000,001~4000000

4,000,001-5000000 5,000,001-7000000

7000,001-above

24

Health Centre) in Dieng Kulon (another village in the same sub-district / Kecamatan). In more serious circumstances AHs members seek attention at medical facilities in the Kabupaten town (of Banjarnegara or Wonosobo). Figure 9 shows the frequency of accessing medical services by the APs in relation to location of the services.

Figure 9. Location of medical services in relation to AHs:

36. Water Supply. Local residents (including the 28 AHs) obtain potable water from mountain springs and water bodies – Telaga Merdada, Telaga Siterus, Gunung Prau, Telaga Pawuhan and wells. Figure 10 presents source of water supply for household needs in the case of 28 AHs. In general, AHs have raised water supply as an issue during the course of the SES.

Figure 10. Source of Water Supply for Drinking and Washing

79%

14%

7%

Location of medical services in relation to AHs

Same village of the AH

In another village in the same

sub-district

In the district/town center

7.1

28.6

10.7

35.7

17.9

7.1

14.3

46.4

17.914.3

Ground well

belonging to the AH

Gunung Prau Telaga Merdada Telaga Siterus Telaga Pawuhan

Pe

rce

nta

ge

(%

)

Water Supply

Source of potable water Source of water for washing

25

37. Garbage Disposal. Based on the responses provided in Figure 11 below, it is clear that there is a garbage disposal problem in Karang Tengah Village, which are indicative of similar problems in the other villages in the Dieng geothermal work area, and corroborated during consultations with local NGOs.

Figure 11. Garbage Disposal Practices among the AHs

38. The above-discussed issues will be addressed by GDE’s CSR/Community Development Program that will be a part of the Sub-project to address in partnership with local communities in order to deliver responsive support and benefits.

AHs’ Perception of the Proposed Sub-project

39. When asked about their view of the Dieng-2 sub-project, 6 out of 28 AHs opined that the proposed sub-project would be beneficial, while 12 AHs feel it will have negative impacts. More women compared to men voiced their fears of negative impact, while only men had a positive perspective of impact. (See Figure 12) Ten (10) respondents had no opinon.

Figure 12. AHs’ Views regarding the proposed Dieng-2 expansion sub-project

15%

7%

14%

32%

32%

Garbage Disposal

Buried by the AH

Collected by local

government

Dump just anywhere

Dump in river

Burned by AH

26

40. Table 8 presents other views regarding the sub-project. Eleven (11) respondents had no opinion. Three (3) respondents felt that the sub-project would generate electricity as a benefit. Eight (8) women respondents were concerned that the sub-project will negatively affect their household livelilhoods. Three (3) respondents feel that the proposed new facility would be noisy, and one said that she would be agreeable as long as the new facility is not noisy.

Table 8. Other Views Concerning the Sub-project

14 male Heads of AHs. Freq. % 14 wives of AHs. Freq. %

No comment 6 21.4 No comment 5 17.9 Electricity 3 10.7 Will cause loss of

livelihood 3 10.7

No assistance 2 7.2 Will reduce HH income 2 7.2 Many roofs damaged 1 3.6 Noisy, not safe, crops

damaged. 2 7.2

Noisy, brine wastes 1 3.6 Afraid that there will be leakages which will damage crops.

1 3.6

Up to the community 1 3.6 As long as not noisy, it’s alright

1 3.6

14 50 14 50

41. When asked what there suggestions might be to ensure that local people receive benefits from the sub-project, 17 people had no comment. 6 AHs requested that tenant farmers be provided with access to replacement land (to lease) and one AH said that attention had to be given to the tenant farmers. Two AHs were concerned that the Project be handled well and that security would be ensured. (See Table 9)

Table 9. Suggestions to Ensure that Benefits Accrue to Local Communities

14 male Heads of AHs. Freq. % 14 wives of AHs. Freq. % No comment 12 42.8 No comment 5 17.9 There is alternative land made available

1 3.6 Provided with / move to replacement land.

4 14.3

42.9

28.6 28.6

0.0

57.1

42.9

Beneficial Negative Impact No Opinion

Fre

qu

en

cy -

Pe

rce

nta

ge

(%

)

AHs’ Views regarding the proposed Dieng-2 expansion

sub-project

14 heads of Ahs 14 Wives of Ahs

27

14 male Heads of AHs. Freq. % 14 wives of AHs. Freq. %

Attention is given to tenant farmers

1 3.6 Provided with alternative work

1 3.6

Total 14 50 Security is upheld 1 3.6 Project is handled well 1 3.6

Provide sosialisation to the community

1 3.6

Up to Geodipa 1 3.6 Total 14 50

42. When asked whether they supported the proposed Dieng-2 expansion sub-project, 7 AHs said they supported the sub-project whilst 17 AHs said that they did not support it. 4 AH had no comment. As may be seen in Figure 13, more men then women supported the sub-project, whilse, more women than men did not support the proposed Dieng-2 sub-project.

Figure 13. Support for the Project

43. Table 10 presents the reasons provided for supporting or not supporting the Project. The most concern was over loss of income or loss of access to source of livelihood.

Table 10. Reasons given for support / rejection of the Project

PARAMETER Male - frequency (%) of response

Female - frequency (%) of

response

Total Frequency (%)

1. Reasons given for supporting Dieng-2 sub-project.

- Village will become more developed

1 (3.6%) 1 (3.6%)

2. Reasons given for rejecting the Dieng-2 sub-project

- Loss of land / income / farming 1 (3.6%) 9 (32.1 %) 10 (35.7 %) - Noise, steam, cause damage to

potato crops 2 (7.1%) 2 (&.1 %)

- Lose income as farm worker 1 (3.6 %) 1 (3.6 %)

42.9

28.6 28.6

7.1

92.9

0.0

Support Do not support No Comment

Fre

qu

en

cy -

Pe

rce

nta

ge

(%

)

Support for the Project

14 heads of Ahs 14 Wives of Ahs

28

PARAMETER Male - frequency (%) of response

Female - frequency (%) of

response

Total Frequency (%)

3. Comments - Up to the community (masyarakat) 1 (3.6 %) 1 (3.6 %) - Should be given compensation for

loss of land 1 (3.6%) 1 (3.6%)

4. NO Comment 9 (32.1 %) 3 (10.7 %) 12 (42.9 %)

Note * one response re: steam overlapped / also included impact on income.

44. Table 11. According to AHs, the two main and best ways to mitigate negative impacts on the local community would be:

i) Project should provide alternative land (to rent) or compensate farmers (28.6%) ii) Project should be out of town away from settlements (21.4%).

This feedback informs decision-making concerning form of compensation for loss of access to arable (productive) land, as well as project design.

Table 11. Best Ways to Mitigate Negative Impacts for Local Community

14 male Heads of AHs. Freq. % 14 wives of AHs. Freq. %

Ensure a distance between the Project and residential area (settlement) / build somewhere elso

4 14.3 No comment 6 21.4

Compensation for affected people / compensation for damages

4 14.3 Alternative land for farmers.

4 14.3

No comment 4 14.3 Project should be out of town, not at mess GDE.

2

Improvement to Geodipa’s development

1 3.6 Provide socialisation to the communities

2

Deal with the noise and disturbance.

1 3.6

Total 14 50 Total 14 50

45. Table 12. According to the AHs, the best way to conduct sub-project communications was via Village meetings (39.3%) or to relay the information via the Village Head and/or informal religious leaders (50%). The pattern of responses was quite distinct between male and female respondents. While male respondents favoured communicating via the Village Head, religious leaders or Geodipa officers, all female respondents preferred village meetings as the mode for sub-project communications. Indicative of other villages, this information informs the formulation of the Communications Strategy with regard to project affected people as well local communities in general.

Table 12. Best Way to Communicate Project Matters to Community

14 male Heads of AHs. Freq. % 14 wives of AHs. Freq. % Via Village Head and/or religious leaders.

11 39.3 At Village Meetings 14 50

Via Geodipa officers 3 10.7 Total 14 50

29

46. Table 13 presents AHs’ reasons for their responses. The main reason to have project communications at village meetings was that everyone could hear the information for themselves (14.3 %), and that the village would take responsibility for the information shared. 5 AHs (17.9 %) requested that the lease coordinators be present as spokespersons/intermediaries for the tenant farmers at village meetings.

Table 13. Reasons for Responses Shown in Table

14 male Heads of AHs. Freq. % 14 wives of AHs. Freq. %

No comment 8 28.6 No comment 9 32.1 So everyone can hear directly from the source

3 10.7 Meeting with tenant farmer group

3 10.7

Inform Village Head first, who will inform community later.

2 7.2 Village will take responsibility

1 3.6

Via coordinators 2 7.2 Among farmers 1 3.6 Total 14 50 14 50

47. If you have concerns or doubts regarding Project implementation eg. accuracy of inventory results, level of compensation or contractor’s activities, whom will you submit your concerns or complaints to? While women respondents preferred to go to the Village Head to seek for clarifications or make complaints, the men preferred to go to / through their lease coordinators. Only 7.2 % said they would go directly to Geodipa.

Table 14. Party to Report Complaints to or to Seek Clarification Through

14 male Heads of AHs. Freq. % 14 wives of AHs. Freq. %

Lease coordinator 7 25 Village Government 6 17.9 Village head 5 17.9 Coordinator 3 10.7 Direcly to Geodipa 2 7.2 Village Head 2 7.2 Total 14 50 Village Head or

coordinator 1 3.6

Will follow what others decide

1 3.6

No comment 1 3.6 Total 14 50

48. How would you seek for clarification or make your complaint? A majority (75%) would seek clarifications or make complaints verbally.

Figure 14. How would you seek for clarification of submit complaints?

30

49. If you are still not satisfied with how a complaint was handled, to whom will you raise the matter again? The highest ranked person respondents AHs would approach for solutions (if still not satisfied) would be land lease coordinators (39.3%). Some 25.1% said that they would approach the Village Head. By and large, male respondents preferred to approach their land lease coordinator for solutions if they were not satisfied.

Figure 15. If you are still not satisfied, who will you approach for a solution?

46.4

3.6

32.1

17.9

Verbally Written Verbally No comment

14 male Heads of Ahs 14 wives of Ahs

Fre

qu

en

cy -

Pe

rce

nta

ge

(%

)

How would you seek for clarification or make your

complaint ?

32.1

7.23.6

7.2

25

17.9

7.2

Coordinator Village Head Have never

complained

before

No comment No comment Village Head Coordinator

14 male Heads of Ahs 14 wives of Ahs

Fre

qu

en

cy -

Pe

rce

nta

ge

(%

)

If you are still not satisfied, who will you approach for a

solution?

31

X. LEGAL FRAMEWORK

A. National Regulations

50. The main legal framework for land acquisition and involuntary resettlement is Law No. 2 of 2012 regarding land acquisition for development in the public interest 31 and it’s implementing regulations including Presidential Regulation (Perpres) Number 71/2012 concerning Land Acquisition for Public Interest and Perpres No 148/2015 on the Fourth Amendment to the Perpres No. 71 of 2012. 51. Law Number 2 of 2012 provides provides a clear procedure and time frame which will accelerate the process of land acquisition. The Government should undertake land acquisition by involving all entitled holders (pihak yang berhak) and concerned entities. The entitled parties shall be those who control or own the object of the land acquisition, inter alia: (a) the holders of land rights; (b) the holders of land rights to manage; (c) nadzir for the waqf32 land; (d) the owners of former customary rights secured land; (e) customary communities; (f) the parties occupying the state land in good faith; (g) land tenure holders; and/or (h) the owners of buildings, plants or other objects related to the land. The object of land acquisition includes; (i) land; (ii) above ground and underground space; (iii) plants; (iii) buildings; (iv) objects related to land; and (v) other appraisable loss that include non-physical losses such as loss of business, loss of job, cost of change of location, cost of change of profession, and loss of the remaining property (residual property that is no longer viable). Land acquisition should be conducted by providing fair and adequate compensation to the entitled parties. The law recognizes that: (i) persons controlling and utilizing land are entitled to compensation; (ii) all losses - lost land and non-land assets, other structures that can be valued - should be evaluated by an independent appraiser; (iii) project location permit will be required that should refer to spatial planning; and (iv) land acquisition will be undertaken by National Land Agency (BPN). 52. The equivalence assessment carried out by ADB in 2017 – 2019 indicates there are more than 50 other laws and regulations related to land acquisition and involuntary resettlement. 53. To settle the issue of people using Government or State owned enterprise land, in addition to the Presidential Regulation No. 71 of 2012, in 2017 the Indonesian Government issued presidential Regulation No. 56 of 2017 concerning Handling Social Impact for Providing Land for National Strategic Projects that was amended by the Presidential Regulation s No. 62/2018 concerning Handling Social Impact for providing land for National Development Projects. It regulates the provision of compensation in the form of money or relocation to non-titled land users. This regulation requires that compensation should consider the cost of mobilization, cost for moving, house rent during the transition period, and loss of income. It also requires the proponent to produce documents on the Social Impact Management Plan in the event that affected government land has been physically used/ controlled by the community consecutively for a minimum of 10 years. The Social Impact Management Plan shall be proposed to the Governor, which subsequently forms an Integrated Team to undertake data inventory, compensation appraisal, and facilitate grievance management.

31 Public interest means the interest of the people, State, and society that must be realized by the government for the

prosperity of the people. Article 10 of the law states that development of power generators, transmission lines, sub-stations, networks, and electricity distribution are categorized as public interest.

32 Waqf - an inalienable religious endowment in Islamic law, typically donating a building or plot of land or even cash for Muslim religious or charitable purposes. The donated assets are held by a charitable trust or waqf organizer.

32

54. Presidential Regulation No. 148 of 2015 provides that land acquisition in the public interest concerning not more than 5 ha of land (i) can be acquired directly by the agency requiring land with the land rights holders by way of sale or exchange or other means agreed upon by both parties (Article 121, Clause 2.)., (ii) does not need to get location determination but should be consistent with the spatial development plan (Tata Ruang / RTRW) for the area (Article 121, Clause 2.), and (iii) valuation of the land is carried out by independent appraisal. The Kabupaten of Banjarnegara no. 11 / 2011 regarding the Kabupaten’s (District’s) Spatial Development Plan for Period 2011-2030 provides for the improvement of the Dieng Geothermal Power Plant facilities (Clauses 5, 10, 18 and 20). Article 121 A of the Presidential Regulation No. 148 of 2015 states that “land acquisition for development in the public interest which is undertaken by a private entity can be done through sale transaction, exchange, or other agreed mechanism between the entitled party with the private entity 55. In addition to the national laws and regulations, GDE has a SOP that provides procedures for (i) lease of State Forest land, (ii) lease of Plantation land, and (iii) for changing name of owner (balik nama) on land title documents. The SOP does not provide specific procedures for land acquisition. PT Geo Dipa adheres to the relevant GOI regulations mentioned above. 56. Indonesia Valuation Standards 204 (SPI 204) on the Assessment of Land Acquisition for Development for the Public Interest. The Indonesia Professional Appraisers Society (MAPPI) formulated the standards by adopting the development of international standards (IVS 2011). Standards 204 provides guidelines for assessment of land acquisition object for compensation in land acquisition for development in the public interest. Assessment includes adequate replacement value of property and land. Assessment standards are also associated with other standards, such as scope of assignment, land property and structures valuation, farmland property valuation, valuation of property with particular business, business valuation, and inspection of cases under consideration.

57. Other related laws /regulations: (i) Government Regulation concerning Environmental Permit, Ministry of Environment

Regulation No. 17 / 2012 where vulnerable / severely affected people are identified as early as possible through the Social Impact Assessment of AMDAL that also seeks participation guidance from local communities in order to obtain the AMDAL and Environmental Permit Issuance. This is likewise provided for in previous environmental laws.

(ii) Law No. 11/2009 on Social Welfare and its implementing regulation Ministry of Social Welfare Decree No. 39/2012 on Delivery of Welfare. Vulnerable / severely affected people are identified as early as possible through the Social Impact Assessment of AMDAL as referred to in the Environmental Law no. 32/2009 on Environmental Protection and Management; Indonesia Government.

(iii) PP. 71 / 2008 On the Third Amendment to Government Regulation No. 48 / 1994; (PP. 27 / 1996 jo and PP. 79 / 1999 jo); Basic Law Government regulation that relates to tax incentive or the income tax rate of land and / or building ownership transfer.

(iv) Law 26 of 2007 on Spatial Planning (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Year 2007 No. 68, Supplement of State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia No. 4725) provides that development and land acquisition in the public interest should be carried out in accordance with regional spatial planning.

(v) Act No. 39 of 1999 on Human Rights describes vulnerable groups: the elderly, children, the poor, pregnant women and people with disabilities. It also recognizes the differences in and the needs of, adat or customary law communities that have to be observed and protected by the law of society and Government” as well as the “Cultural identity of adat

33

law communities, including rights to ulayat (traditional or customary) land that need protection.” It espouses that the acquisition of ulayat land by Government must be done through due process of law following the free, prior and informed consent of adat communities.

(vi) Law No. 40 of 2007 Concerning Limited Liability Company (PT) Article 74 (1) observed all companies having its business activities in the field of and/or related to natural resources, shall be obliged to perform its Social and Environmental Responsibility. Implementation regulation is provided in the Presidential Regulation No. 47 of 2012 concerning Social and Environmental Responsibility of “Perseroan Terbatas”.

B. Asian Development Bank (ADB) Policy

58. The ADB’s Safeguard Policy Statement (SPS) combines three of its key safeguard policies; environment, involuntary resettlement and indigenous peoples (IP).33 It aims to promote sustainability by managing potential environmental and social risks. The two sub-projects (Dieng and Patuha) do not trigger IP safeguard, and therefore, no IP plan is required. The Dieng sub-project will result in land acquisition and involuntary resettlement, and the RP is prepared to elaborate the displaced persons’ entitlements, the income and livelihood strategy, institutional arrangements, monitoring, budget, and time bound implementation schedule. The project is considered category B as less than 200 persons will experience significant impact as per ADB SPS.34 59. The objectives of the involuntary resettlement safeguards are to avoid involuntary resettlement wherever possible; to minimize involuntary resettlement by exploring project and design alternatives; to enhance or at least restore the livelihoods of all displaced persons in real terms relative to pre-project levels; and to improve the standards of living of the displaced poor and other vulnerable groups. Based on the ADB’s SPS, there are 12 policy principles related to involuntary resettlement: screening, meaningful consultation, establishment of grievance redress mechanism, livelihood improvement or restoration, assistance to displaced persons, improvement of living standard for the displaced poor and vulnerable groups, procedure for negotiated land acquisition, compensation and assistance for displaced persons without title to land, preparation of resettlement plan, disclosure of resettlement plan and monitoring report, resettlement cost, compensation payment prior to physical and economic displacement, and monitor of resettlement outcome and impact to the APs living standard. 60. Involuntary resettlement does not apply for negotiated land acquisistion (land acquisistion with willing buyer- willing seller). ADB encourages the borrower/client to acquire land and other assets through a negotiated settlement wherever possible, based on meaningful consultation with affected persons, including those without legal title to assets. Develop procedures in a transparent, consistent, and equitable manner if land acquisition is through negotiat settlement to ensure that those people who enter into negotiated settlements will maintain the same or better income and livelihood status.

33 Source: http://www.adb.org/documents/safeguard-policy-statement 34 The involuntary resettlement impacts of an ADB-supported project are considered significant if 200 or more persons

will experience major impacts, which are defined as (i) being physically displaced from housing, or (ii) losing 10% or more of their productive assets (income generating). ADB financed projects are classified into the following IR categories: (i) Category A: a proposed project is likely to have significant involuntary resettlement impacts; (ii) Category B: a proposed project includes involuntary resettlement impacts that are not deemed significant; and (iii) Category C: a proposed project has no involuntary resettlement impacts. Projects which entail physical and/or economic displacement require the preparation of a resettlement plan. Source;

34

61. Other Policies. The ADB policy on gender and development adopts gender mainstreaming as a key strategy for promoting gender equity, and for ensuring participation of women and that their needs are explicitly addressed in the decision-making process for development activities. 62. Another key policy is the ADB Public Communications Policy that seeks to encourage the participation and understanding of people and other stakeholders affected by ADB-assisted activities. Information on ADB-funded projects should start early in the preparation phase and continue throughout all stages of project development, in order to facilitate dialogue with affected people and other stakeholders.

C. Gap Analysis

63. The GOI enhanced its country system in order to address land acquisition issues for development projects in the public interest. The new Land Acquisition Law No. 2/2009 and its implementing rules and regulations approximate harmonization with the ADB SPS of 2009. The new law grants that persons with no legal title over the land they occupy or utilize are entitled to compensation 35 for improvements found thereon, including compensation for job and business losses, moving cost,36 etc. A land acquisition plan also needs to be prepared by the agency requiring land. People affected by land acquisition are consulted and their complaints heard and resolved in the most expeditious way during the planning and implementation of land acquisition. 64. There are still some gaps between the new Land Acquisition Law of Indonesia with the ADB SPS but some gaps have been bridged by the provisions of other relevant laws. Remaining gaps revolve around (i) the provision of livelihood recovery programs for severely affected people and vulnerable groups to ensure that their lives will not be worse off due to the project, (ii) relocation assistance for physically displaced residents and (iii) transition allowance. A comparison between ADB SPS 2009 and GOI regulations on involuntary resettlement is presented in Appendix 12 along with gap filling measures proposed as project policies.

D. Project Resettlement Principles

65. Based on the gap analysis presented in Appendix 12, this RP has been prepared and formulated to meet Indonesian Laws and regulations and the ADB’s SPS. The RP is to guide the Project’s land acquisition and involuntary resettlement process to support compliance with Indonesian Law and ADB SPS. The objective of resettlement policy is to improve, or at least restore, the livelihoods of all APs, especially vulnerable groups so that the living standard of APs do not become worse off compared to pre-project levels. 66. Based on the Indonesian Laws and regulations and the ADB’s SPS, the following principles will be applied for land acquisition and involuntary resettlement in all the Project components:

(i) Avoid involuntary resettlement as much as possible. If this is not possible, impacts shall be minimized by exploring project and design alternatives. Efforts to minimize resettlement impacts have been taken by GDE through; (a) using GDE’s lands for Dieng – 2; only 3,010 m2 additional land will be acquired for the sub-project through negotiated

35 See Act No.2/2012 Elucidation of Article 40. 36 Elucidation of Article 40 of Law No. 2/2012 with the following provisions: For building rights or land use right,

Compensation granted to the holder of building right or use rights on buildings, plants, or other objects related to land owned by him/her, while Compensation on land granted to the holder of the ownership or management rights.

35

land acquisition; and (b) apply use of underground transmission cable for the construction of the transmission line along approximately 6 Km from the proposed Dieng Unit 2 Power Plant to the existing sub-station. Efforts to minimize resettlement impact will continue during implementation.

(ii) Screen sub-project components during feasibility study or before preparation of resettlement plan to identify involuntary resettlement impacts and risks and the likelihood of impacts per subproject activity.

(iii) Carry out culturally appropriate and gender-sensitive social impact assessments (SIA) to assess potential impacts on APs particularly with affected vulnerable groups.

(iv) Conduct meaningful consultations with affected APs, stakeholders, concerned NGOs, and community groups to solicit their participation across land acquisition and involuntary resettlement process and monitoring. Inform APs on the land acquisition and involuntary resettlement process, their entitlements, and compensation and assistance options. Pay attention to the need of vulnerable groups, especially those below the poverty line, the landless, the elderly, women and children, and those without legal title to land and ensure their participation in consultations.

(v) Establish a grievance redress mechanism to receive and facilitate the affected persons’ concerns

(vi) Improve or at least restore the livelihood of the APs through (a) land-based income and livelihood program; (b) replacement of assets with equal or higher value; (c) compensation at full replacement cost for lost assets; and (d) additional assistance through benefit sharing where possible.

(vii) Assist and compensate APs without title or any recognizable legal rights to land for non-land assets at replacement cost.

(viii) Pay compensation for lost land and non-land assets prior to physical or economic displacement. Civil works will not commence until APs are fully compensated, and other entitlements take place.

(ix) Disclose the RP document and its updates, if required to the APs and other stakeholders in an accessible place and a form and understandable language. The RP will be disclosed on project and ADB’s website.

(x) Negotiated land acquisition will follow procedure in a transparent, consistent, and equitable manner principles and be confirmed trough written record and verified by an independent third party.

(xi) Monitor implementation of the resettlement planning and resettlement outcomes and impacts on the standards of living of APs. Disclose the monitoring reports on the project’s website and make it available on the project office;

(xii) The Sub-project will not issue the notice to proceed (NTP) for any construction works until full payment has been fully disbursed to all APs and compensated APs have cleared the acquired land and harvested their crops in a timely manner.

67. Acquisition of privately-owned land for the construction of pipeline and inspection road ROW from Well Pad 9 to power plant will be conducted through negotiated land acquisition as the land to be acquired is small plot (3,010 m2). According to the Indonesian legal framework, land acquisistion less than 5 hectare can be undertaken through direct transcation with the land-owners.37 In the case of the negotiation did not reach agreement and land owner refeused to sell the land, GDE will find another land and make necessary reallignment of the pipeline and the inspection road. In such case, ADB policy related to negotiated settlement applies. Land clearing (take the GDE’s land used by 23 households for farming to be used for the project) for the construction of power plant will be undertaken through involuntary resettlement. Principles on

37 see Presidential Regulation 148 of 2015.

36

involuntary resettlement safeguard of ADB SPS and prevailing Indonesian legal framework will apply.

E. Procedure and Principle of Negotiated Land Acquisition for Pipeline and Inspection Road ROW

68. Land acquisition will be conducted through a negotiated land acquistion or direct transaction with the landowners. Expropriation and the use of government authority to remove people forcibly will not be applied. The negotiated land acquisistion will apply the following principles.

(i) Meaningful consultation with the affected persons including those without legal title to assets;

(ii) Negotiation of compensation with the landowners will be conducted in transparant manner. Should the negotiation does not reach an agreement, landowners have right to exit from the negotiation;

(iii) Offer of adequate and fair price for land and/or other assets. The valuation of land and non-land assets will be carried out by an indepdent appraiser. Depreciation of assets value will not be applied. Transaction cost including tax associated costs and cost of certificate of land deed official will be borne by the project;

(iv) Engagement of an indepdent external party to document the negotiation and settlement process.

(v) Documentation of Recording of the process of negotiated land acquisistion including consultation activities and negotiation of compensation.

69. To ensure that the APs do not become worse off compared to pre-project levels, GDE will provide livelihood restoration program to the APs who will be severely affected because of the land acquisistion. The program will be expanded to all the APs (See Chapter IX). 70. The steps of negotiated land acquisition for new pipeline and inspection road are detailed below:

(i) GDE approves the ROW route (corridor of impact) of the project components. (ii) GDE establishs a Land Acuqisition Team (LAT) which will involve Banjarnegara District

Government and and Land Office (KATR/BPN). (iii) The LAT coordinates with the Village Head of the impacted village and sub-district

(Kecamatan) office for the land acquisistion process. (iv) The LAT carry out a Detailed Measurement Survey (DMS) with presence of the

landowners. (v) The LAT consults with landowners on the land ownership and willingness of the

landowners to sell. (vi) GDE mobilizes independent appraiser (KJJP) to carry out replacement cost assessment

with regard to land, crops / plants and structures. The KJJP carried out replacement cost study with reference to the entitlemet matrix set in the RP (Para 99, Table 8-1).

(vii) The LAT asks the land price from the landowners and conduct negotiation with landowners. Negotiations will be conducted following the negotiated land acquisistion principle above (para 68).

(viii) GDE pays immediately the negotiated amount to landowners after all necessary documents required for the land acquisition processes have been completed by landowners. Payment will deliver directly trough APs bank account. In case APs have no account, GDE will help to open new account in the bank nearest to the village.

37

(ix) The lad owners relinquish land rights and submit the evidence of ownership of land acquisition objects to the LAT.

(x) Document and verify the negotiated land acquisistion process by independet external party engaged by GDE to ensure the transparent process of negotiation and that equal bargainingn power parties involved in the negotiation.

71. Figure 16 presents the steps of the land acquisition process to be conducted for the pipeline and inspection road ROW.

Figure 16. Land Acquisition Process for Pipeline and Inspection Road ROW

38

F. Land Clearing Procedure

72. Steps to be taken for the land clearing will follow the procedure set forth in the Presidential Regulation No. 62/2018. However, considering that the number of APs and their losses is small, the land clearing might be conducted by the land clearing team which will be established by GDE. Key steps for land clearing are as follow :

(i) GDE establishs Land Clearing Team (LCT) which will involve Banjarnegara District Government

(ii) The LCT verifies and validates plots of GDE’s land used or controlled by the communities (APs). The IOL results conducted by ADB TA consultant will be used for the verification and validation.

(iii) The verification and validation will involve the communities (APs) who use or control the GDE’s land.

(iv) The indepdent appariser engaged by GDE carry out replacement cost assessment on the lost arable land and crops income of the APs to be used for calculation of compensation amount. The entitlemet matrix set in the RP (Para 99, Table 8-1) will be used for the assessment.

(v) The LCT determines eligible communities (APs), and formulate scheme and amount of compensation based on assessment by independent appraisal.

(vi) GDE implements compensation payment to the APs with supervision by the Auditor (BPKP)

(vii) Payment of compensation by GDE is done directly to the APs bank account. In case the APs have no bank account, GDE will help the APs to open new bank account at a the bank clossest to the village.

(viii) The APs clear their properties and no longer use the land for any purpose not later thant 7 days after the compensation is received.

G. Unanticipated Impacts and RP Update.

73. Should unanticipated involuntary resettlement impacts emerge during project implementation, GDE shall ensure the conduct of a social impact assessment and may (i) update this RP, or (ii) formulate a new RP depending on the extent of the impact changes. Unanticipated impacts will be documented and mitigated based on the principles provided in the project resettlement policy set forth in the RP. The entitlement matrix of the resettlement plan may be updated to reflect the relevant changes but the standards set in the original entitelemt matrix (in this RP) can not be lowered when the RP is updated. GDE shall submit these documents to ADB for disclosure on ADB’s website and convey relevant information in them to the affected persons/community.

39

XI. CONSULTATION, PARTICIPATION, AND INFORMATION DISCLOSURE 74. This chapter discusses the required approach and plan for consultation and information disclosure with Sub-project stakeholders impacted by the land acquisition process. The approach has been developed to adhere to the requirements set out in relevant national laws and regulation as well as the ADB SPS.

A. Consultation and Participation

75. The Indonesian legal framework and ADB's SPS and Public Communications Policy emphasizes the application of meaningful consultation and participation of APs and communities in development projects. The elements of meaningful consultation include:

(i) begins early in the project preparation stage and is carried out on an on-going basis throughout the project cycle;

(ii) provides timely disclosure of relevant and adequate information that is understandable and readily accessible to affected people;

(iii) is undertaken in an atmosphere free of intimidation or coercion; (iv) is gender inclusive and responsive to the needs of disadvantaged and vulnerable groups; (v) is held at a time and venue convenient for women to ensure at least 30% women

participation; and (vi) Enables the incorporation of all relevant views of affected people and other stakeholders

into decision-making, such as project design, mitigation measures, the sharing of development benefits and opportunities, and implementation issues.

76. Meaningful consultations will be carried out with the entitled parties/APs including vulnerable groups to ensure participation from planning up to implementation. Particular attention will be provided to the needs of vulnerable group and ensure their participation. 1. Consultation at Plannng Stage (during RP preparation). 77. The consultation activities started from the Inception stage (20 – 22 March 2019), continued through IOL and SES activties in April and August 2019, and involved a second round of stakeholder consultations conducted over 11- 13 September during the course of the Fact Finding Mission. Information sharing meetings and consultations were held with (i) local authorities at different levels – district (Kabupaten) and sub-district (Kecamatan), (ii) local community and groups of affected households; (iii) local non-government organizations such as Women’s Association (PKK), Farmer’s Association, Inclusive and Social Development Institute (ISDI), Yogyakarta etc.38 The purpose of these meetings was to enable the relevant stakeholders to become familiar with the sub-project, its general facilities, and understand clearly the probable resettlement, social, and environmental issues that may evolve during the implementation of the sub-project39

38 Follow-up consultations with more NGOs/CSOs are being planned. 39 During the meetings, the consultant teams relayed to participants the following topics: (i) General information of the

sub-projects, its lay-out / route and features; (ii) the location and scale of possible land acquisition and the village, Kecamatan and Kabupaten this would affect; (iii) objectives and Principles of RP according to the requirements of Government of Indonesia and ADB‟s policy on involuntary resettlement; (iv) schedules of socio-economic survey (SES) and Inventory of loss (IOL); (vi) Livelihood Restoration program; (vii) Compensation or land replacement mode (options for cash and/or in-kind compensation); (viii) Gender and vulnerable group issues; and (ix) Mechanisms of

40

78. Community and Stakeholder Consultations I with local communities and stakeholders in March 2019 were conducted in 6 villages located in the Dieng Geothermal Work Area (Wilayah Kerja Panas Bumi Dieng): Villages of Kepakisan, Pranten, Sikunang, Dieng Kulon, Karang Tengah and Bakal.40 The participants realized the importance of development of a new power plant with associated facilities, including pipelines. Mostly there was no objection to the existence of the existing power plant, pipelines and transmission lines, or the proposed Dieng - 2 which was still in the planning stage. People at Dieng conveyed that development is essential for equitable distribution of electricity to the areas which lack it; even though they know that the power addition will not directly be enjoyed by them. However, some requests and concerns were raised by the communities: (i) that GDE needs to provide adequate compensation and ample notice if GDE will utilize its land used by people for farming; (ii) GDE to provide income restoration program to the communities near by the project areas; (iii) GDE needs to address impacts of water, air and noise pollution from Dieng Geothermal plant activities; (iv) the large steam pipelines spoil the view of the Dieng area which is a tourist attraction; (v) Pollution (leakages) that cause crops to die; (vi) more community members be given opportunity to work at GDE Dieng. The public (stakeholder) consultation reports is presented in Appendix 13. 79. Initial consultations held with 24 APs (tenant farmers - Kelompok Merdada Sejahtera.) using GDE’s land and 4 coordinators as part to the Stage I IOL and SEC were conducted over 22 – 24 April 2019. The consultation revealed that (i) tenant farmers acknowledged rightful GDE-ownership of the land, and were willing to surrend occupation of the land back to GDE as and when GDE required, (ii) all tenant farmers requested to be granted access to alternative land to lease in the event they lose access to the land currently being cultivated; (iii) tenant farmers only have experience as farmers and farm labourers and are reluctant to embark on other forms of livelihood activities; and (iv) very few of the affected people have education beyond primary school and it appears that it is very difficult for local people to enter into / adopt new forms of livelihood. A noteworthy comment made druing these consultations was that participants said that it was up to the larger community whether they agreed with GDE’s plans to contruct a new power plant at the proposed location. 80. Information was provided to the Village Head of Karang Tengah before the IOL, and SES activities commenced on 14 August 2019. The meeting was to inform the Village Heads and APs about the up-coming IOL and SES so that they will be aware and do not become worried about field activities and are prepared to participate in SES and FGDs. The hamlet head (Kepala Dusun) and village office representative and APs were involved in the IOL and staking out activity. 81. Focus group discussions (FGDs) were carried out with the APs over 21 – 23 August 2019 to discuss and formulate income restoration assistance (if applicable) and gender concerns. FGD attendance sheets are provided in Appendix 14. 82. Community and Stakeholders consultation II. A joint stakeholder consultation activity was conducted as part of the Fact Finding Mission to share and provide feedback on the main points

APs participation, grievance redress, monitoring and evaluation through all phases of RP preparation, updating and implementation.

40 Consultations in the six villages were attended by 183 persons (139 (76%) male and 44 (24%) female. Participants included community members (that include potential affected persons) living close to the project areas in affected 9 villages, representatives of village government, community-based organizations (including PKK, Karang Taruna, Bumdes, elderly groups), sub-district government, districts agencies (Social, environment, and BKSDA), GDE Headquarters and Dieng Unit, the TA consultants, and ADB. In addition, several interviews were also conducted with key informants that include land renters/users, village heads, and community members.

41

of the draft RP. Village Heads, community leaders, APs, GDE HQ and GDE Dieng, ADB, and consultants participated in the consultations. Participants see positive aspects of the consultations and expect on an on-going basis consultation throughout the project cycle. Written information was also requested rather than verbal information. Social issues raised by participants were partly the same as March consultation 2019, but the submission of objections was softer. Some of those concerns/issues have been addressed during the consultations and in safeguards plans, but some need to be considered for improvement of mitigation measures and require GDEs attention. Common issues raised are (i) opportunities of jobs at GDE, community development programs to the communities, (ii). noise, community risks, water pollution/abstraction, impact during construction, (iii). GDE’s support to women, (iv). The most critical issue was related to negative perceptions about project which were raised by the head coordinator of tenant farmers of GDE land, and former head of Karang Tengah Village. They assume the project will make residents suffer. Increasing of noise will disturb people because their settlement is located very close to proposed power plant. The second stakeholder consultation report is presented in the second half of Appendix 13. 83. NGO Consultations. Consultations were also conducted with local NGO’s concerned with Dieng and geothermal development on 30 August and 1 October 2019. Some issues discussed during consultation was about degradation of environmental due to potatoe cultivation practice, alternative source of livelihood, and how exgeothermal exploitation can be developed in harmony with the environment and community welfare development. A summary of the consultations with NGO is provided in Appendix 15. 2. Consultation during Implementation 84. Consultation will be continued over the course of the implementation stage in relation to land acquisition, land clearing, implementation of livelihood restoration program and project construction. Consultations related to land acquistion will be conducted by GDE LAT (Land Acquisition Team) with support from Social Safeguards staff at the Dieng Unit, PMU, and PMC. The consultation shall include, but not limited to:

(i) Socialization and consultation with AHs on their willingness to sell; (ii) Results of social assessment and Detail Measurement Resut (DMS); (iii) Entitlements/compensation packages and other forms of assistance; (iv) Valuation methods per result of independent appraiser study; and (v) Negotiations on the amount of compensation for affected land and plants

85. Table 15 summarizes information provision and consultations during land acquisition/resettlement planning and implementation stages and also indicates the responsible institutions. B. Disclosure

86. The GDE (EA) shall provide information to and consult with the APs/affected and other stakeholders in a manner appropriate for the anticipated project impacts. This requirement is intended to facilitate engagement to establish and maintain constructive relationships over the life of the project. 87. A Project information booklet (PIB) has been prepared describing the Dieng-2 sub-project (see Appendix 16). The PIB will be translated into Bahasa Indonesia and distributed to the APs, local Government (Village and Kecamatan), and other stakeholders. The PIBs will be made available at GDE Dieng office and contractor’s office and will be accessible to the APs and

42

stakeholders. Any updated PIB following the RP update, if required will also disclosed as per provisions of the PIB for the RP as mentioned above. 88. The approved draft RP and updated RP (if any) are required to be disclosed. These documents will be generated and produced in a timely manner, and posted on both ADB and GDE websites. The RP will be made available at GDE Dieng Office and accessible to the APs and stakeholders. During project implementation, GDE will prepare monitoring reports on the implementation of the environment and social safeguards and submit the same to ADB for review on a semi-annually basis. These monitoring reports must be posted on both ADB and GDE websites as well.

43

43

Table 15. Consultation and Participation PlanTable

No Stage/Activities Objectives Method Venue Participants (M/F) Timing Responsibility

A Planning Stage of Land Acquisition

1 Stakeholder Consultation

To inform the project plan, potential impacts, and obtain feedback on the existing projects and planned project, especially on environment and social issues.

Meetings 6 village offices

Potential APs, Village and sub-district offices, community leaders, district environment agency, district social agency, and district forestry agency, GDE, ADB, consultants M:167 F:46

21-23 March 2019

GDE, ADB staff and consultants

2 Initial consultation with APs (tenant farmers / penyewa)

To obtain feedbacks on the land clearing impacts.41

Individual meetings

Farming area, APs houses

APs F: 24 persons and 4 coordinators

24 April 2019 GDE, consultant, and head of village

3 Consultation with affected subdistrict and village government

Discussion related to GDEs community development program

Meeting GDE Dieng Unit Office

Head of Batur Sundistrict, Head of Village of Kepakisan , Dieng Kulon, and Karang Tengah All men

6 August 2019

4 Geothermal Goes To School

Explaining what Geothermal is in general by UGM Lecturers, what Geo Dipa does, and the role of geothermal for the region

Socialization Batur Subdistrict Office

Head of Subdistrict, Student of UGM, GeoDipa, community within the Subdistrict, representative of village official, District Public Works

6 August 2019 GDE

5 Inform Village Head of Karang Tengah re:

To inform on the IOL/SES activities and obtain permission

Meeting Village Office

Village Head

15 August 2019

GDE, consultant, and Head of village

41 Some environmental safeguards questions were also consulted at the same time.

44

No Stage/Activities Objectives Method Venue Participants (M/F) Timing Responsibility

IOL/SES activity and survey of land acquisition corridor.

6 Discussion with WWF (NGO)

Sharing information related to national policy related on geothermal, including advocay programs

Meeting WWF Office Jakarta

WWF staff, ADB consultant, GDE M = 1 F =3

20 August 2019

7 Discussion with Walhi (NGO)

Discussion related to Walhi concerns related to geothermal development plan

Meeting Trans TV Office

WWF staff, ADB consultant, GDE M = 2 F = 2

21 August 2019

8 Consultation on land acquisition plan

To obtain feedback on land acquisition and land clearing

FGD Village Leader house

APs M: 49 F: 28

22 – 23 August 2019

GDE and SES Consultant

9 Discussion with ISDI (Inclusive and Social Development Initiative, Universiti Islam Sunan Kalijaga, Yogyakarta

Discussions concerning development challenges in the Dieng area.

meeting KARSA office

ISDI Founder, SES Consultant, KARSA staff M=2 F=1

30 August 2019

SES Consultant

10 Stakeholder Consultation II

Obtain feedbacks from APs and relevant stakeholders for on the mitigation measures set forth in the RP

Meetings Village office

APs, Village and sub-district Offices, GDE, ADB, consultants Total: 178 M: 126 F: 52

11 – 13 September 2019

GDE, ADB staff and consultants

B Land Acquisition and IR Implementation

I Land Clearing 1 Consultation on

IOL results, compensation and compensation scheme

Obtain feedbacks and agreement on IOL result and compensation scheme

Meeting Village office

AP, Village and Subdistrict, Land Clearing Team, GDE, consultant At least 30% of participants are women.

2019 after IOL result completed

GDE, Land Clearing Team, Consultant

45

45

No Stage/Activities Objectives Method Venue Participants (M/F) Timing Responsibility

Ensure participation of vulnerable groups

2 Negotiation of compensation rate

Free and fair negotiations over the quantum of compensation per affected household

Meeting Village office

AP, Village and Subdistrict, Land Clearing Team, GDE, consultant At least 30% of participants are women. Ensure participation of vulnerable groups

End of 2019 or early of 2020 after replacement cost completed

GDE, Land Clearing Team, Consultant

3 Compensation payment

Payment compensation,

Paid by transferred to APs bank account

Village Office

APs, village office, GDE, Consultant

Early 2020 GDE/Land Clearing Team, Bank

II Land Acquisistion 1 Consultation on

IOL Result Consultation forum to verify and/or adjust IOL results

Meeting Village Office

APs, Village and sub-district Offices, GDE, consultants At least 30% of participants are women. Ensure participation of vulnerable groups

2020 or After 14 days of “pengumuman” has elapsed.

GDE, consultant, and Head of village

2 Negotiation of compensation rate

• Free and fair negotiations over the quantum of compensation per affected household. Observed by third party (local NGOs / CSOs)

Meeting Village Office

APs, Village and sub-district Offices, GDE, consultants (if possible KJPP attend) At least 30% of participants are women.

2020 or After result of IOL is completed and no more complaints from affected households

GDE, Head of village, MUSPIKA, KJPP

46

No Stage/Activities Objectives Method Venue Participants (M/F) Timing Responsibility

▪ Informed the result of appraisal from KJPP.

Ensure participation of vulnerable groups.

3 Compensation payments

Paid Compensation Paid by transferred and observed by third party (local NGOs / CSOs)

Village Office

APs, Village and sub-district Offices, GDE, Bank officer. At least 30% of participants are women. Attention to vulnerable groups.

2020 or to be completed before economic displacement (land clearing) for construction mobilization.

GDE, Bank

III Livelihood Restoration Program 1 Consultation to

Initiate Livelihood (Income) restoration and improvement activities

Reconfirm income restoration programs are still feasible and generally acceptable. Get the feedback from APs the program type of income restoration.

Meeting / FGD

Village Office

APs, Village and sub-district Offices, GDE and consultant At least 30% of participants are women. FGD with women group and vulnerable groups.

After the implementation of compensation payment

GDE, consultant/ NGO

2. Consultations of Livelihood (Income) Restoration and improvement activities

To verify and implement the program agreed by Affected person.

Meeting / FGD

Village Office

APs, Village and sub-district Offices, GDE and consultant At least 30% of participants are women. FGD with women group and vulnerable groups.

After the implementation of compensation payment and during program implementation

GDE, consultant/ NGO

47

XII. GRIEVANCE REDRESS MECHANISM

89. A grievance mechanism is a process for systematically receiving, investigating and responding to stakeholder complaints. Throughout the life cycle of the Project, queries and grievances from the impacted community may arise hence a Grievance Redress Mechanism (GRM) is established to address grievances raised. The GRM will be triggered in all instances where a complaint is received by the Sub-project or its contractors (such as the land acquisition consultants / sub-contractors). 90. To streamline existing procedures and be consistent with international best practice, a GRM have been established and a grievance redress committee (GRC) have been set up. Figure 7-1 shows the basic process of the GRM. Grievance related to land acquisition andspecific aspets to sub project activities, such as increased dust and/or noise or any other impact due to project construction, should also use this mechanism. The objective of the GRM is to resolve complaints related to the project in a time-bound and transparent manner. The procedures to file a complaint and the details of the contact person(s) will be disclosed by the PMU and site offices in Dieng and Patuha to the potentially affected communities prior to the start of land acquisition and resettlement activities and construction works. More information on the GRM shall be posted on billboards at the construction sites or as a flyer to be made available at the construction project site office. The flyer will be available in Bahasa Indonesia.

91. GRC members will include the Head Office General Project Manager and the HSE Manager of the PMU, the head or representative from the village (kecamatan), the Site Office Project Manager, Public Relation (PR) staff, HSE Staff (i.e., environment and social safeguard staff at Dieng or Patuha), the PMC, and a representative of the Contractor(s). The PMC will act as the secretariat of the GRC. GDE will ensure fair representation of women in the GRC and observe transparency in handling complaints at all times. The GRC will be responsible for resolution of complaints (if any) within a month (30 calendar days) from the date it was received, to maintain a record of complaints received and resolved, and to advise the complainant on the decision made. The PMU (through the PMC) will create a database of complaints filed and resolved. A complaint can be filed either in writing, by phone, or in-person to the designated contact person on-site

92. GDE shall ensure that (i) an efficient grievance redress mechanism is in place and functional to assist the affected persons and other stakeholders in resolving queries, conflicts and complaints, if any, in a timely manner; (ii) all complaints are registered, investigated and resolved in a manner consistent with the provisions of GRM detailed in the RP, DDR, and IEE/EMP; (iii) the complainants/aggrieved persons are kept informed about status of their grievances and remedies available to them; and (iv) adequate staff and resources are available for supervising and monitoring the mechanism.

93. Procedures. The person filing the complaint can seek redress in three levels: (i) at the site through the designated contact person at the site office (i.e. PR staff), the PMC, or the Contractor, (ii) through the GRC, and (iii) the appropriate courts of law. Affected person complaining can seek redress through the legal system of the Government of Indonesia at any point in the GRM process. The levels to file a complaint is as follows:

48

(i) Level 1 – Site Office through the designated contact person (i.e. PR staff). Complaint to be resolved at the Site Office level (i.e., environment safeguard staff or social safeguard staff, PMC, Contractor) within five working days and advise the Complainant accordingly.

(ii) Level 2 – GRC. When a complaint is not resolved at Level 1, Complainant can submit the complaint to the GRC. The GRC will convene, review the submission and make a decision within 30 days from the date of receipt. The Complainant will be informed of the decision in person or by mail. The Complainant shall be consulted by the GRC when identifying grievance redress options. The GRC may collaborate with relevant agencies (i.e district land office and TP4P/TP4D for land acquisition and involuntary resettlement, District agency of environment) to resolve the complaint.

(iii) Third level – Appropriate Courts of Law. When the complaint remains unresolved, the Complainant will be referred by the GRC to the appropriate courts of law.

94. GDE will keep a record of the following: (i) contact details of complainant, (ii) date the complaint was received, (iii) nature of complaint and agreed resolution/corrective action, (iv) status of the complaint handling, (v) date the resolution/corrective action was implemented, and (vi) the final outcome.

95. The summary of grievances filed and resolved will be included in the semi-annual environmental monitoring reports submitted to ADB. The associated costs to maintain the GRM will be borne by GDE.

49

Figure 17. Grievance Redress Mechanism

50

XIII. ENTITLEMENTS, ASSISTANCE AND BENEFITS

A. Eligibilities

96. This RP covers the impacts of land acquisition and land clearing for all new facilities including the Dieng-2 power plant, wellpads and wells, pipeline and access road ROW, and the underground transmission line. The subsequent section discusses the implementation of the land acquisition, land clearing and resettlement process conducted by the sub-project as of October 2019. 97. There are four types of displaced persons in the Dieng subproject;

i) Persons who lose their agricultural land with formal legal rights (certificate), or those whose claim over the land is recognized as a full title including persons occupying the state land in good faith.

ii) Persons who cultivate the lost land under or without lease arrangement iii) Persons who lose income earning opportunities as a consequense of the project iv) Vulnerable and Severly Affected People

98. The cut-off date sets the time limits to determine eligibility of persons living and/or with assets or interests inside the project areas. Should they be adversely affected, they will be entitled to compensation for their affected assets, including rehabilitation measures as needed, sufficient to assist them to improve or at least maintain their pre-project living standards, income-earning capacity and production levels. The cut-of-date for all assets affected on the GDE land (land clearing) are set at 31 August 2019, while for new corridor to be acquired will refer to the date when DMS was completed done by GDE LAT. The cut-off date will be widely communicated by the Sub-project in Bahasa Indonesia which is well understood in the area. Should any persons occupy the Sub-project area, build new structures or grow new crops after the cut-off-date has been announced, these new assets will not be eligible for compensation and/or resettlement assistance.

B. Entitlement Matrix

99. The Project will provide the entitlements to the landowners and users according to the specifications set out in Table 8-1. Project entitlements cover the scope of impacts and the involuntary resettlement provided for in this RP.

51

Table 16. The Sub-project’s Entitlement Matrix

NO. TYPE OF LOSS ENTITILED PARTY / PERSON

ENTITLEMENT DETAILS

I. Loss of Land

1. Loss of land, including agricultural and residential land Applies to land acquisition

Those who have formal legal rights or those whose claims over the land is recognised as a full title, including people occupying State land in good faith. 6 AHs

▪ Cash compensation at replacement cost and reflective of fair market value at the time of payment of compensation; or land replacement with at least similar attributes to the acquired land in term of value, productivity, location, and titling.

▪ Any taxes and transactional cost borne by the project.

▪ Financial assistance for the renewal of the land ownership documents (certificate and land documents recognized as full title) for the residual area of the entitled persons' land.

▪ If the remaining affected land can no longer function for the specific use and utilization, the entitled party can ask for compensation for their entire land at replacement cost (Law No. 2 / 2012 article 35).

▪ Valuation of compensation conducted by a licensed independent property appraiser. It will be used for compensation payment by the GDE

II. Loss of Crops

2. Loss of crops Applies for land acquisistion and land clearing

Owners regardless of land tenure status (with certificate of recognizable rights, informal dwellers, occupants) 29 AHs

▪ Annual crops: compensation will be paid based on prevailing market rates.

▪ Perennial crops: compensation at replacement cost taking into account crops’ productivity and age.

▪ No deduction of depreciation for the valuation of crops.

▪ Valuation of crops will be determined by independent appraiser.

▪ 90 days advance notice before harvesting / land clearing.

52

NO. TYPE OF LOSS ENTITILED PARTY / PERSON

ENTITLEMENT DETAILS

III. Economic Losses

3. Loss of arable land for farming Applies to land clearing

People who have leased / occupied GDE land for farming. 23 AHs

▪ Cash compensation for loss of crops income equivalent to a minumum of one year of net product market value

▪ Loss of income allowance will be determined by an independent appraiser.

▪ 90 days advance notice before harvesting / land clearing.

• All cultivation activities end of February 2020, after compensation delivered

▪ APs are allowed to harvest prior to land clearing.

IV. Temporary or Permanent Impacts on Non-land Assets during Construction

4. Temporary or permanent impacts due to construction.

For those who have formal legal rights or whose claim on land is recognized as a full right.

▪ For lease payments of the affected land by the contractor based on applicable rental fees and agreement with land owners.

▪ For productive land, rental fee will not be less than net income that would have been generated from the affected productive land.

▪ Compensation for non-land assets acquired (trees, plants, structures) permanently affected will be compensated at replacement cost.

▪ Land will be restored to pre-project conditions or better after construction has been completed.

▪ 30 – 60 days’ notice given to land owners before land is used temporarily by contractor(s).

▪ This agreement should be stipulated in the contract / agreement with civil works contractor(s).

5. Those who have no formal legal rights (certificate) or recognizable title (informal dwellers, croppers)

▪ Compensation for non-land assets (trees, crops, structures) at full replacement cost.

▪ No rental fee for the period of the impact.

▪ Land will be restored to pre-project conditions or better after construction has been completed.

53

NO. TYPE OF LOSS ENTITILED PARTY / PERSON

ENTITLEMENT DETAILS

6. Government or State enterprises / communal property and assets (e.g. schools, mosques, village office power poles, village road etc.)

▪ Rebuilding the facility or provide cash compensation based on the agreement with affected party(ies).

Other Appraisable Losses

7. Transaction cost Applies to land acquisition and land clearing

Entitled party who has lost land and non-land assets regardless the formal legal rights to land.

▪ Allowance to cover administration cost, renewal of land ownership for residual land, land clearing.

▪ Valuation will be determined by independent appraiser.

8. Compensation for waiting period (interest) Applies to land acquisition and land clearing

▪ Cash compensation based on risk-free interest, Government bank interest.

▪ Valuation will be determined by independent appraiser.

9. Loss of resource base (high risk of impoverishment) Applies to land acquisition and land clearing

▪ One household member per AH given the opportunity for employment in project related job during construction.

▪ Participation in livelihood restoration program (LRP).

▪ LRP will be integrated with GDE CSR / ComDev Program.

10. Unanticipated impacts or losses

▪ Compensation for any damages to the properties, based on prevailing replacement cost

▪ Provisions of mitigating measures shall be mitigated and documented based on project principles set forth in this RP

54

C. Valuation of Assets

100. As stipulated in the regulation, valuation of assets both for acquisistion of private land and land clearing will be determined by independent appraisal. Land acquisition assessment applied the Indonesia Valuation Standards 204 (SPI 204). The bases of assessment are: (i) Fair Replacement Value–this value can be understood as a value based on the interests of the owner (the value to the owner);42 (ii) Market value equivalence;43 (iii) non-physical losses caused by the compulsory right relinquishment of property owner;44 (iv) property ownership is not limited to ownership rights, but can be interpreted as control, management and use of property in accordance with applicable laws and regulations or according to the agreed scope of assignment; (v) valuation date is the announcement date, and the date of site determination for development for public interest in accordance with the applicable legislations; (vi) value adding should be calculated based on the risks incurred from owner’s potential losses. The adequate replacement value must be higher than Property Market Value or at least equal to the compensation transaction value of similar property (if the comparator is similar property from a compensation transaction).

101. Compensation assessment in this standard includes but not limited to: i) the construction of resettlement; ii) education and motivation programs; iii) provision of working facilities; and iv) business facilities compensation. Assessment approach is specified in the detailed SPI 204 (PPI 04).

Table 17. Assessment Approaches Using Indonesia’s Valuation Standards

Valuation object Calculation basis Approach Remark

Physical: Land or land & structures

Market and Non-Market

Market & Income

Structure &/or Complementary Facility

New replacement cost with adjustments

Cost In principle, valuation standard set by Independent appraisers’ association does not apply depreciation for physical condition of the affected building. Depreciation deduction for affected structures, will be given back to the entitled parties in the form of premium rate

Crops Markets & reasonable cultivation calculation norms

Income With the Discounted Cash Flow method for one cycle

Market For non-commercial plant, using references from relevant agencies.

Cost Immature crops Non-Physical: Adequate replacement of the loss on right relinquishment from landowners who will be given a premium

Market and non-market

Income Cost

Based on applicable laws and regulations Losses due to termination or closure of business premises.

42 Value to the owner is defined as the economic benefits derived from the possession or ownership of a property. 43 The market value is one of the basis for value determination by taking into account limited or entirely absent data

market. This market value can be compared with the value based on the potential use (without looking at the benefit of land acquisition plan for the public interest).

44 Non-physical loss is other losses, as referred to in Law No. 2/2012, Article 33 f and its elucidation, applicable or according to the agreed scope of Tenure.

55

55

Valuation object Calculation basis Approach Remark

Loss of income due to loss of acccess to arrable land for farming can be considered for more than one cropping cycle to 2 years

Loss of job or loss of business, including profession shift.

Additional compensation calculated based on:

- potential income45 - income for the last

month46

e.g.: fish farmers, restaurants, & workshops - if no other provisions, can be considered for an average 3 months for business & 6 months for the professional shift

Emotional losses (solatium)

e.g.: 5% - 30% from the market value of homes (land & building) as stipulated in these guidelines with the agreement of the assignor.

Transaction cost Based on socio-economic study conducted by expert consultant or applicable laws & regulations

Cost • Cost of moving • Cost of clearing • Tax associated costs • Cost of Certificate of Land

Deed Official (PPAT) Waiting period Compensation (interest)

Based on the risk-free rate, or the government bank deposits interest

Based on applicable laws and regulations

Loss of residual land Market Market data Other physical losses Reparation cost Cost

102. As per SPI 204, loss of crops income due to land acqusistion or land clearing will be valued with net product market value of the crops for more than one cropping cycle to two years, based on type of crops, soil fertility and avalability of replacement arable land47.

D. Special Assistance to Severely affected and Vulnerable Households

103. Vulnerable AHs will be given preferential opportunity for employment in Project-related jobs. GDE will identify the project related jobs and offer the vulnerable groups with jobs. Social Safeguard Staff in Dieng unit and PMU will ensure that all of the vulnerable households will get all information easily and secure all their compensation and assistance prior to land clearance. 104. Severely affected and vulnerable AHs are entitled to participate in a livelihood restoration program to help keep their livelihood better or at least the same as before project. Livelihood restoration activities were identified and prepared based on social impact assessment and in close consultation with the APs. The program consists of short-term livelihood economic

45 For business - net income plus the liabilities of business costs need to be paid for the transfer, such as the cost of

permanent employees 46 For shift in profession 47 Some practices on assessment for compensation of lost crops in toll road development project indicate that the

appraiser will take a maximum value of 2 years of harvest income with consideration of one year for farmers to get a replacement of arable land , and another one year to assist the farmers to meet the income before the land can produce an optimum harvest. Minimum the appraiser will recommend loss of crops income equivalent to one year of net product market value from the arable land.

56

productive activities and a reorientation of GDE’s Community Development Strategy and Program. The program will be expanded to the communities around projects areas as part of sharing project benefits among the GDE neighboring communities and as a vehicle for implementing remedial measures for temporary impacts during construction. The detailed scheme, target participants, timeline, and estimated budget are described in the following chapter.

105. Gender strategy. The following measures were / will be adopted to address gender issues as well as for other vulnerable sectors in this sub-project:

(i) In conducting the Detailed Measurement Survey and consultations on resettlement activities, both women and men will participate in the discussions. Elderly and disabled will also be included (may be by representation);

(ii) Any meeting and or consultation will be held at time and venue convenient for women to ensure at least 30% women participation;

(iii) Women will be given equal chance in getting hired for unskilled work and receive equal remuneration for the same work as the men;

(iv) Women, the elderly, and disabled will be prioritized in livelihood restoration program to be provided during RP implementation.

(v) Disaggregated monitoring indicators by gender and vulnerable groups will be developed for monitoring social benefits, economic opportunities, livelihood, and resettlement activities; and

(vi) Women will be present in Grievance Redress Committees (GRCs).

57

57

XIV. LIVELIHOOD RESTORATION

106. The Dieng-2 Sub-project recognizes the importance of ensuring that livelihoods are restored (or ideally improved) for all landowners and users impacted by the projects land acquisition process. It has identified that a total of 24 affected households are currently deemed potentially severely affected, and a total of 14 are deemed vulnerable48 and as such, in addition to the compensation provided, AHs will be provided with additional assistance from the sub-project.

107. Methodology. In order to determine appropriate livelihood restoration activities, an assessment was conducted of the economic situation in Dieng, of Karang Tengah Village, and of the AHs themselves.

A. Summary of Livelihood Restoration Assessment

108. The Gross Domestic Product (GDP) of Kabupaten Banjarnegara and Wonosobo is dominated by agriculture, forestry and fisheries businesses. In the Dieng area, potato is the major agricultural produce. Potato was a boom crop in the Dieng area in the 1980s-90s leading to massive extensification (along the slopes and replacing forested areas) as well as intensification. The Dieng landscape is dominated by potato mounds. As well, the financial and agro-chemical industries have grown apace in the area. However, due to a number of factors, profitability of potato production has declined over the last 20 years. But farmers remain trapped in a continuous debt-driven cycle of potato cultivation which is becoming more and more risky leading to more and more loan defaults. There is a documented dynamic in Dieng where land ownership is growing in the hands of a few, while weaker and less competitive farmers lose their land and homes and are forced into farm labour or to migrate out of the Dieng highlands to the less profitable lowland areas49.

109. Apart from potatoes, farmers also grow a combination of temperate vegetables (cabbage, carrots, leeks, and spring onions). An endemic fruit called carica (a type of papaya) is now widely cultivated along the edges of potato and vegetable plots. This fruit is normally stewed in syrup before it is consumed. Many carica processing home industries have grown up in the area. The product is sold in Dieng, Wonsobo town centre, and to other provinces. The production of potato crisps and crisps from other produce such as cassava and yam is popular for home consumption as well as for sale. An endemic herb called purwaceng is also processed and sold as an herbal product or combined with coffee and tea as a beverage. While the Kabupaten Tourism Agencies provide training for starting-up of such small-scale food products businesses, the respective Kabupaten Health Agencies monitor and issue licenses (PIRT) for the production of home-made food products.

110. Another important economic sector in the Dieng Plateau is tourism. This has contributed to the establishment of many homestays in specific locations around Dieng.50

48 All vulnerable household are also potentially severely affected. 49 Santoso, Hery (2019). (i) “Dieng – Perubahan Ekologi, Proses Produksi dan Identitas.” (a power point presentation)

(ii) “Kejayaan dan Ketersingkiran. Proses Diferensiasi di Kalangan Petani Kentang di Dataran Tinggi Dieng”, and (iii) “Pembentukan Relasi Kapitalis dalam Proses Produksi Kentang di Dieng.” (2019)

50 e.g. Dieng Kulon where ancient Hindu temples are located, Sembungan Village – the highest village in Indonesia from where tourists trek up a further half an hour to catch the sunrise panorama from Sikunir Peak, the Sikadang crater and many other sites. Apart from homestays, many small businesses have started up to cater for the tourist market – tour guiding, food outlets, shops and stalls selling souvenirs and handicrafts, shops and counters selling

58

111. A number of reports have been prepared and activities conducted which have produced information relevant for the formulation of livelihood restoration measures for local communities in the Dieng Geothermal Work Area (Wilayah Kerja Panas Bumi Dieng). These are: (i) a social mapping study; (ii) consultations and FGDs with the APs and Stakeholders conducted between 18-26 March and 9-17 September 2019;51 (iii) gender action plan related to women’s access and participation in income and livelihood restoration.52

112. While most of the concerns raised during the first round of community consultations (18-26 March 2019) were about negative environmental and construction related impacts. However, the following points were recorded during the second round of community consultations (9-17 September 2019):

(i) Both men and women in all the 6 villages are keen to obtain information about skilled and

unskilled job opportunities as well as business opportunities from Geo Dipa Unit 2 project, and to be invoived in projects. Women participants said that currently there is lack of information about job and business opportunities and requested that information on job and business opportunities should be disseminated using various media such as flyer, banner, and WhatsApp application. A man in Bakal Village added that information disseminated through flyers, bannesr and WhatsApp should use simple language. They asked GDE prioritize local people/neighboring communities for work at GDE and information preference through village offices, not “paguyuban” or other intermediaries.

(ii) Training and mentoring on mechanic and welding for youth has been design by GDE’s to give more skill which will enable and empower youth to work in non-farming sector, including opportunity to work in GDE Dieng unit as skill worker.

(iii) Participants in general affirmed that they have received some direct benefits in the form of GDE’s on-going ComDev program, but they expected GDE to continue providing community development support for education, youth programs, waste management and sustainable environment development, SMEs training and inputs.

(iv) Decline in drinking water quality (potential contamination) and decrease in water supply during dry season was articulated by participants from Kepakisan, Sikunang, Dieng Kulon and Pranten. They requested GDE to provide water supply program to address this issue.

(v) Various other suggestions related to Geo Dipa Community Development Programs were articulated: ▪ Focus on sustainable environment programs in particular waste management, and

renewable energy training programs. ▪ community development programs should include monitoring activities, including

monitoring of previous tree-planting activities which are now left abandoned. ▪ provision of early education/preschool. ▪ improvement of roads and bridges.

locally produced food products. The Dieng area also features a number of annual events which draw in both domestic and international tourists – the Dieng Cultural Festival (early August) being the most popular.

51 Most of the concerns raised during the first round of community consutations were about negative environmental and construction related impacts. The following inputs were recorded during the second round of community consultations: 52 Gender Analysis (and Gender Action Plan), May 2019 – prepared by ADB staff gender consultants at ADB-IRM following the above-mentioned public consultations.

59

59

113. In addition, the SES carried out over 14 – 23 August 2019 interviewed 7 successful local entrepreneurs and conducted focus group discussions (FGDs) with all affected households as well a number of local community members with regard to potential alternative livelihood activities, and preferences.

114. A livelihood restoration assessment which reviews available secondary as well as primary data is presented as Appendix 17. The following sections present the main results of the assessment. Based on a number of unanticipated but critical issues that emerged from the review, the scope of the assessment expanded to generate a strategic recommendation for reorienting the Community Development (ComDev) program so as to be more attuned and responsive to the bigger socio-economic issues in the area.

115. Overall Strategy. At FGDs conducted on 22 and 23 August 2019, both heads of AHs as well as their wives insisted that they only know how to farm (viz. potato and vegetable cultivation) and are unwilling to adopt new livelihood activities.53 In response to this, (i) entitlements for offsetting resettlement impacts will include a sufficient quantum of compensation, and include GDE facilitation in securing alternative plots of land for AHs to lease in order to continue their current livelihoods. (ii) In addition, AH members will be prioritised to fill upcoming job and labour vacancies at GDE Dieng, and to receive scholarships, and (iii) young working age members of AHs (both men and women) will be prioritised for inclusion in a number of income restoration activities that will be programmed over period 2020 – 2022.

116. Compensation. The quantum of compensation will include a transaction period of up to 12 months in order to secure alternative land to purchase or lease from the time they vacate leased GDE land or relinquish acquired land to GDE. In effect, as the subject has already been broached during the FGD session of 23 August 2019 and stakeholder consultations conducted over 11-13 September 2019, AHs will have from September 2019 to January 2019 (4 months) to identify and secure alternative land to lease or purchase. GDE will assist all tenant farmers to secure alternative land for lease by March 2020. While this comes under the “compensation entitlement”, this essentially constitutes the first part or layer of the income restoration strategy.

B. Livelihood Restoration Strategy & Assistance Package

117. Employment at GDE Dieng. In the short term, the second part of the income restoration strategy will be to prioritise AH members for employment in sub-project activities (fulfilling standard requirements of the plants or the new construction). Information preference through village offices, not “paguyuban” or other intermediarie ,.54 As a longer term measure, scholarship opportunities will be prioritised for potential children in AHs in order to prepare them to fill future HR needs. This will be synchronised with long term HR strategy for the Dieng Unit. That children from AHs receive scholarships will alleviate part of household financial burden for children’s education (equivalent to the outcome of a positive livelihood restoration intervention).

118. Livelihood Restoration Activities. Based on the FGD with the Youth Group (Karang Taruna) and younger community members of Karang Tengah Village (which included young AH members) on 21 August 2019, livelihood restoration (or development) activities will be programmed under the ComDev program for period 2020 – 2022 to target younger family

53 In the case of the women, they claimed that they would rather work as farm labourers in the event they/their households lose access to (rented) productive land. 54 Similar opportunities will also be given to 4 land lease coordinators

60

members of affected households who are not as keen as their parents on earning a living solely from agriculture. This will enable and empower young AH members to contribute to overall household income restoration. The proposed activities are presented in Table 9-1. The same package will also be made available to approximately 104 households in 6 villages so as to generate project benefits for the more vulnerable members of the community and/or those who experience unexpected impacts during the construction phase. AH members will be given first priority to participate in one or more of the activities over a 3-year period (2020-2022). This time-frame will allow for social preparation (engagement, extension, identification of potential clients) and establishing a good foundation for the income restoration activity (training, provision of equipment, obtaining of permits – if necessary, facilitating access to micro-finance), development, and achieving self-reliance (kemandirian) stages of micro-enterprise development. A value-chain (business model development) study will also be financed in 2020 to support marketing of locally processed products. All LRP activity packages will include activity-specific facilitation services which will also provide extension 55 concerning livelihood diversification and security.56

119. Social preparation. The Dieng-2 social safeguards personnel will work with the Dieng Unit PR officer in consulting and collaborating with respective Village Governments to identify, select and prepare the various LRP activitiy target groups or persons for participation in annual ComDev activities. Discussions (on 30 August 2019) with an NGO working in Dieng (Inclusive Social Development Initiative UIN Kalijaga, Yogyakarta) highlighted an important lesson: the community facilitation and development approach should factor in religious aspects, given social conditions in the Dieng area.

Table 18. Livelihood Restoration Activities

TYPE OF ACTIVITY TARGET

PERSON / GROUP

Number

Severely AHss and vulnerable AHs

GDE’s Neighboring

Communities57

1. Employment for unskilled labour at GDE Dieng (inc. project related work)

AH members, community members

24 Vulnerable/Severely HH members from Karang

Tengah and 4 coordinators

30 community members

from 6 villages

2. Scholarships and board and lodging allowance

Students from AHs

24 students. 30 students from 6 villages

3. Value chain analysis, development for carica processing and marketing (including permits/certification).

women Value chain analysis will benefit all carica home

industries. 24 Vulnerable/Severely

HH members

6 groups in 6 villages

(5-7 people per group)

– 30–42 people

4. Value chain analysis and development for processing and marketing of potato crisps

women

1 group per

village

55 Extension is a process of working with rural people in order to improve their livelihoods. This involves helping farmers to improve the productivity of their agriculture and also developing their abilities to direct their own future development. (FAO) 56 Household livelihood security is defined as adequate and sustainable access to income and resources to meet basic needs (including adequate access to food, potable water, health facilities, educational opportunities, housing, time for community participation and social integration). Livelihoods can be made up of a range of on-farm and off-farm activities which together provide a variety of procurement strategies for food and cash. (FAO). 57 Vulnerable households.

61

61

TYPE OF ACTIVITY TARGET

PERSON / GROUP

Number

Severely AHss and vulnerable AHs

GDE’s Neighboring

Communities57

and crisps from tubers (cassava, yam, sweet potato) including permits (certification)

Value chain analysis will benefit all similar home

industries

24 Vulnerable/Severely HH members

(6 people per group) – 36 ppl

5. Training, mentoring for the following: a) mechanic, b) welding, c) sewing d) craft

Various

24 Vulnerable/Severely HH members

30 persons for types of training

(from all 6 villages).

120. In collaboration with the Dieng Unit PR officer, the Dieng-2 social safeguards and PR supervisor will support implementation of LRP activities. The Dieng-2 Unit of the PMU will monitor progress and results of LRP activities on a semi-annual basis. End-of-year M & E will evaluate performance and provide recommendations for achieving RP targets of improving living standards of AHs.

62

C. Long Term Re-orientation of ComDev Program

121. The proposed approach for generating benefits for local communities under the Project is as follows:

(i) Expand the Livelihood Restoration activities to also reach other community members (See the last column of Table 9-1). This is to promote a perception of fairness among on-lookers.

(ii) Program specific activities that were clearly raised during the September round of community consultations. This will include:

a. Provision of 12 new wells (2 wells per village) as an immediate response to potable water supply issues (to be implemented in 2020).

b. Provision of periodic free health screening and follow-up medical services (from 2020 onwards), and

c. Consolidation of waste (garbage) recycling, training and marketing of products for an existing group in Sikunang Villages (2020).

(iii) Reorientation of GDE’s ComDev strategy and Program via institutional strengthening of Village Governments. Increase critical awarenss of village governents and village level activists regarding livelihood security and ecological degradation issues, and to empower village governments to be able to undertake strategic planning, and to feed outputs into the annual government development planning process (Musrenbangdes) as well as back to inform GDE’s ComDev programming.

(iv) Implementation of new livelihood security solutions based on (iii). 122. The main activity identified for reorienting GDE’s ComDev Program in order to become more strategic and less philanthropic is strengthening of local Village Government in development planning and budgeting by developing a geo-social-spatial information system. (. The instrument developed for this is based on GOI Law no. 6 / 2014 concerning Villages, and Minister of Villages, Development of Isolated Villages, and Transmigration No. 16/2018 concerning priority for utilization of Dana Desa funds for 2019.

123. Strengthening of the bottom-up/participatory planning process is meant to create greater critical local awareness of the inevitable declining state of potato agriculture, diminishing carrying capacity of the fragile highland eco-system, and the systemic process of accumulation and dispossession, in order to advocate structural changes, and propose more strategic development interventions that will help transform local livelihood strategies into more sustainable ones that are able to sustain levels of welfare and also rehabilitate or at least stabilize degraded eco-systems. It should be ensured that recommendations from the final climate change assessment 58 (to be shared with the PMU) feed into this process.

124. The on-the-job training process for this exercise will take 4 months per village. It will be conducted by specialist NGO services have experience introducing and conducting the necessary geo-social-spatial training at village-level. TORs are provided in Appendix 18.

58 Mutually beneficial conservation and water sharing measures between the geothermal proponents and local communities in farming. A water for geothermal products/services exchange program could be explored; the GDE conducts a series of capacity building on climate smart agriculture (e.g., water use efficiency and use of drought resistant species in crop production, new geothermal applications for agro-aqua-industries, and water supply forecasting and sharing, in exchange for GDE support or geothermal resources (e.g., steam, hot water, greenhouse development) for the incubation of new livelihood opportunities for agri-aqua based MSMEs

63

63

125. The output of the exercise will be a web-based geo-social-spatial information system (with dashboard) established and able to be managed by the trained village cadre, a publication which Village Governments may use to communicate with Kabupaten, Provincial Government, development partners and other stakeholders. If the activity in each village may be successfully completed before August 2020, the outputs may feed into the annual Government development planning and budgeting process (Musrenbangdes 59 ), update the village medium-term development plan (RPJMDes60), prepare village development work plan (RKP61), as well as inform GDE ComDev annual programming. New activities that are more strategic in responding to community needs will enable better coordination of development budgeting under village budget (APBDes62) and ComDev program budgeting. If the process cannot be completed before August 2020, then outputs may feed into the 2021 planning and budgeting cycle. An updating process will be conducted on an annual basis to generate progressive annual plans.

126. Proposals that emerge from this process that are directed towards the ComDev program may be accommodated as part of the reorientation of ComDev approach towards more responsive, strategic, and empowering assistance to local communities. An indicative budget of Rp. 300 million / village / year has been preliminarily estimated 63 to finance these new activities for period 2021-2024. Definitive annual budget allocation and total number of beneficiaries will depend on the new activities generated by geo-soscial-spatial information system that will be taken up by the re-oriented ComDev program.

D. Implementation Schedule

127. The implementation schedule for the livelihood restoration / enhancement, ComDev reorientation and new livelihood security solution activities constituting a Community Development program (to be financed under the Dieng-2 sub-project) is presented in Table 9-2.

E. Estimated Budget

128. Table 9-3 provides the estimated budget for the Livelihood Restoration and ComDev Program to be financed under the Dieng-2 expansion sub-project. The total budget for period 2020-2024 is approximately IDR 17.463 billion (US$ 1,229,831).

59 Musyawarah Rencana Pembangunan Desa 60 Rencana Pembanguan Janka Menengah Desa 61 Rencana Kerja Pembangunan 62 Anggaran Pembangunan Belanja Desa 63 based on consultations concerning annual ComDev budget allocations with the PMU / CORSEC.

64

Table 19. Implementation Schedule for Livelihood Restoration / Enhancement and new ComDev Activities:

No Step/Activity

2019 2020 2021 2022 2023

Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4

1 Finalize LRA and ComDev packages

2 Prepare budget for LRP activities

3 Social preparation (identification/formation of target gorups)

4 Implementation of LRP

4.1. Training

4.2. Delivery of equipment/inputs

4.3. Access to finance (if necessary)

5

Implementation of LRP and enhancement activities (Development and Growth) for 30 AHs and 110 vulnerables HHs in 6 villages

6 Procure services of consultant/NGO for developing geo social spatial planning instrument

7 Implementation of ComDev activities

7.1. Digging and construction of wells (12 wells , 2 wells each villages)

7.2. Survey and design of water supply rehabilitation for 6 villages

7.3. Rehabilitation of water supply for 6 villages

7.4. Consolidation of garbage recycling activities for one group in Sikunang Village

8 Provision of free health screening and follow up services (100 households)

9 Conduct geo social spatial planning instrument and method to strenghten local village developing planning capacity

65

65

10 Planning and budgeting of annual development activities for APBDes and GDE Comdev

11

Implementation of new livelihood security solutions (generated by program no 9) under the Community Development Program

12 12.1. LRP / ComDev mentoring evaluation and reporting (incl. Outcome)

12.2. Corrective action

66

Table 20. Cost Estimates for Livelihood Restoration Plan and ComDev Reorientation Program under the Dieng-2 Expansion sub-project.

No.

Category / Activity Target Location 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 TOTAL

(Rp. million)

A. Adjust HR strategy to create more opportunities for hiring local people (and to create better buy-in from the community)

1 Priority to members of affected households for suitable job vacancies (2020 onwards) for which they qualify.

24 AHs for 3 year period.

Karang Tengah

4 coordinators Karang Tengah

30 HHs each from 6 villages/year

6 villages *

2 Identification, scholarships and training for potential youth in skills and higher education required for operational stage of Dieng-2 and Dieng-3 (2020 onwards).

24 children from AHs for 5 years

Karang Tengah

240 240 240 240 240 1,200

30 children for 5 years 6 villages * 300 300 300 300 300 1500

B. Livelihood Restoration & Ennhancement

3 Carica processing and marketing

a) AHs 2 groups (12-14

women) Karang Tengah

640 14

654

b) Project Benefits 42 women 6 villages * 245 497 759 21

1,522

4 Food produce processing and marketing

a) AHs 3 groups (18 women) Karang Tengah

640 18

654

b) Project Benefits 54 women 6 villages * 640 658 658 18

1,974

5 Vocational training and equipment

a) AHs 24 youth Karang Tengah

744 24

448

67

67

No.

Category / Activity Target Location 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 TOTAL

(Rp. million)

b) Project Benefits 60 youth 6 villages *

884 66

950

C. Community Development (Regular)

6 Digging / construction of 12 wells 2 wells / village 6 villages* 1,800

1,800

7 Free medical screening and follow-up

100 people 6 villages * 350 350 350 350 350 1,750

8 Consolidation of waste (garbage) recycling (training, marketting)

6 groups 6 villages * 300

300

D. ComDev Strategy & Program Reorientation

9 Specialist NGO Services for introducing geo-sosial-spatial planning method to Village Governments **

60 Village Cadres (Village Govt., LKMD,

BUMDes**) and 6 village communities

6 villages 1,667 720 737

3,124

Total

7,246 3705 3110 929 890 15,876

Contingencies (10%) 11

724.6 370.50 311 92.9 89 1,587.60

Grand Total (Rp. Million) 7,970.6 4,075.5 3,421.0 1,021.9 979.0 17,463.6

US$ 561,309.9 287,007.0 240,915.50 71,964.8 68,943.7 1,229,831.0

Note: * 6 villages - Karang Tengah, Kepakisan, Dieng Kulon, Bakal, Pranten and Sikunang

** LKMD (Lembaga Ketahanan Masyarakat Desa - Village Community Security Institution), BUMDes (Badan Usaha Milik Desa - Village Corporation)

** Strategic livelihood security improvement activities identified by this process (from 2020 onwards, on an annual basis) will be proposed for financing by Dana Desa / APBDes (Village Development Allocations) as well as annual GDE ComDev budgets. (Will include water supply system rehabilitation for 6 villages.)

68

XV. RESETTLEMENT BUDGET AND FINANCING PLAN

A. Estimated cost for Resettlement

129. Costs related to social safeguards will be financed by GDE. The cost includes: (i) detailed costs for replacement of affected asset based on assessment by independent appraisal, (ii) budget for implementation of three-year livelihood restoration programs (2020-2022) and ComDev reorientation activities (2020-2024), (iii) operational costs, which consist of administrative cost and budget for a land acquisition and assessment team to handle objections/ grievances, land appraisal, and measurement. A contingency of 10% of total amount was applied. GDE will ensure that adequate funds are made available as and when necessary for the efficient and timely implementation of resettlement. 130. An estimated budget of IDR 21,351 billion (approximately US$ 1,503,592) is estimated for procurement of land through negotiated settlement willing seller-willing buyer, to compensate for loss of access to productive land, and to finance livelihood restoration activities as well as ComDev reorientation activites (which will generate project benefits for the local communities) . Table 10-1 provides the breakdown of the resettlement plus project benefits costs.

B. Procedure for Funds Flow Mechanism

131. Funding Mechanism for payment of compensation. Based on indicative amounts provided in the RP, the PMU will prepare a budget allocation for land acquisition for 2020 to be taken from State Equity Injection (PMN64). However, given the experience of previous land acquisition activities (2011) in Dieng, it may be prudent to allocate up to 2-3 times the indicative amount specifically for the land compensation component. Once negotiations are successfully concluded, the LAT will obtain account numbers for each of the affected household heads. In case AHs do not have bank accounts, the LAT will assist the AHs concerned to open bank accounts at the bank nearest to the village. Compensation funds will be transferred by GA division directly to the AH accounts. The same mechanism will be apply for land clearing compensation

132. Funding Mechanism for Livelihood Restoration and ComDev Reorientation. The planning and budgeting of Livelihood Restoration, and ComDev Reorientation & Program was prepared by the consultant in close collaboration with PMU. As such, the budget for 2020 activties is within the overall Community Development budget for 2020. Budgeting for subsequent years activities may refer to Table 10-1. Funds will be allocated by the PMU and channelled through GDE’s regular ComDev funding mechanism.

64 PMN – Penanaman Modal Negara.

69

69

Table 21. Overall Cost Estimates For Resettlement Plan & Project Benefits

No. ITEM TARGET 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 TOTAL TOTAL SOURCE OF

FUNDS (Rp. million / juta) (US$)

A. Land Acquisition and Clearing 1. From land owners 6 land owners 1,249 1,249

2. Compensation for 24 land users 24 land users 1,357 1,357 3. LCT and LAT Costs (4% of above) 104 104.

Sub-total (A) 2,710 2,710 190,845 GDE B. Livelihood Restoration Plan 4. Un-skilled labour employment 58 persons 5. Scholarships (and living allownances) 54 students 540 540 540 540 540 1,700 6. Carica processing (micro-enterprise) 56 women 885 511 759 21 2,176 7. Processing of local produce (micro-

enterprise) 72 women 1,280 676 658 18 2,628

8. Vocational training 84 youth 744 908 66 Sub-total (B) 3,449 2,635 2,023 579 540 9,226 649,718 GDE

C. Regular ComDev 9. Construction of 12 wells 6 villages 1,800 1,800 10. Free health screening and services 100 persons 350 350 350 350 350 1,750 11. Waste Recycling and Marketting 6 groups 300 300

D. ComDev Reorientation & Strategic Program

12. Introduction of geo-sosial-spatial planning instrument and method to strengthen Village Governments’ development planning capacity*

60 Village Cadres65 And 6 village communities

1,667 720 737 3,124

Sub-total (C+D) 4,117 1,070 1,087 350 350 6,974 491,126 GDE 1 External Monitoring Agency 500 500 35,211 GDE TOTAL 10,369 5,330 2,611 550 550 19,410 GDE Contingencies (10%) 1,037 533 261.1 55 55 1, 941 GDE GRAND TOTAL (Rp. million) 11,405.9 5,863 2,872.1 605 605 21,351 GDE GRAND TOTAL (US$) 803,232 412,887 202,261 42,606 42,606 1,503,592 GDE

Note: * Strategic livelihood security strengthening activities identified by this process (on an annual basis, from 2020 onwards) will be proposed for financing by Dana Desa / APBDes (Village Development Funds) as well as annual GDE ComDev budgets. (Will include water supply system rehabilitation for 6 villages.)

65 VG – Village Government, LKMD (Lembaga Ketahanan Masyarkat Desa – Village Community Security Institution), BUMDes (Badan Usaha Milik Desa – Village Corp.)

70

XVI. INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS

A. Institutional Arrangements

133. GDE will be the Executing Agency (EA) for the project which responsible for overall coordination, policy direction, and administration of project activities, including those related to social safeguards. A Project Management Unit (PMU) has been established for managing both the Patuha-2 and Dieng-2 expansion sub-projects. The Director of Operations will direct the PMU, which will be headed by a General Manager (GM) with overall responsibility for day to day management and supervision of the GPGP. The PMU will be the Implementing Agency (IA).. Figure 11-1 presents the organizational structure of GDE and where the PMU sits within the organisation. Within the PMU, the GM will be supported by an HSE and Safeguard Manager, who will in turn be supported by a Government Relation and Social Safeguards Assistant Manager with a Safeguards staff. The Government Relation and Social Safeguards Assistant Manager and staff will be responsible for and will assist the HSE and Safeguard Manager with respect to social safeguards compliance oversight, establishment of the LAT, activities assosciated with land acquisition, livelihood restoration and ComDev reorientation activities.

134. The PMU will have a unit at field sites. A Social Safeguards and Public Relation (PR) Supervisor will be designated at the Dieng Unit who will responsible for (i) supporting the government relation and social safeguards assistant manager for the day-to-day implementation and monitoring of safeguards plans, including implementation of the LRP, (ii) support the Land Acquisition Team (LAT) in implementation of the whole land acquisition and land clearing process, which will include facilitating consultations and disclosing information to affected communities and APs; and (iii) supporting the functioning of the grievance redress mechanism. The Social Safeguard and PR Supervisor will be a member of Grievance Redress Committee coordinated by the GA and Finance Staff. 135. A land acquisition team (LAT) will be established by the PMU/GDE Headquarters office for conducting the land acquisition process. The LAT will comprise members from relevant divisions at GDE head-quarter level (GA), and Unit-level (HC/GA and PR), and representatives from the Kabupaten Banjarnegara Land Office (KTR-BPN), the Camat of Batur’s office and Head of Karang Tengah Village. The government relation and social safeguards assistant manager at main office, and social safeguard and PR supervisor at the Dieng Unit will support this team, and ensure that other related IR requirements are fulfilled. 136. The PMU will collaborate with the Pengawal, Pendamping dan Pembangunan Nasional (TP4P) led by Attorney to ensure timely land acquisition. The GDE LAT will be responsible for coordinating with the TP4P. The LAT will also collaborate with Banjarnegara District Land Office (KATR/ BPN) to support the land acquisition process and update land ownership status. 137. A Project Management Consultant (PMC) will be recruited and will include an international and a national Social Safeguards / Resettlement specialist (TOR for the consultants are in Appendix 19). The consultants will support the Social Safeguards Assistant Manager, social safeguard staff in Dieng, GDE’s Land Acquisition Team and CSR Division in the implementation of land acquisition and involuntary resettlement activities, delivery of Livelihood Restoration programs, ComDev Reorientation activities, and monitoring. The consultants will also support the procurement of NGO/consultant services and be responsible for designing and conducting capacity building training for staff handling social safeguards at GDE HQ and units (GDE Dieng and GDE Patuha) prior to land acquisition and IR implementation. Training topics may include

71

71

current Indonesia legal framework and ADB SPS on social safeguards, meaningful consultations and disclosure, income and livelihood restoration program, grievance redress mechanism, and monitoring. Provision of technical guidance will continue during project implementation and most importantly in relation to monitoring of compliance and success of efforts to ensure that AHs do not become “worse off”.

138. Project contractor(s) will be responsible for handling project impacts during construction including compensation for any damaged or lost assets set forth in the RP. This obligation needs to be emphasized in the project contractor’s contract. The contractor will also be responsible to receive and resolve grievances in collaboration with social safeguard staff at Dieng. The contractor may be a member of the grievance redress committee responsible to resolve complaints. The contractor will receive briefing on social safeguards or participate in social safeguard capacity building training. Table 11-1 shows the roles and responsibilities related with Resettlement Plan implementation.

72

Figure 18. Project Organisational Structure for Resettlement Plan Implementation

73

73

Table 22. Responsibilities concerning Resettlement Plan implementation

ENTITY RESPONSIBLITIES

Executing Agency (GDE BOD)

▪ Responsible for overall coordination, policy directions, and administration, including those related to social safeguards

▪ Approval of RP

PMU ▪ Responsible for the day-to-day implementation of the Project and will be accountable for technical, safeguards, and financial reporting

▪ Ensure proper GRM in place, and accessible to APs and local communities in the sub-project area.

o Oversight of GRM operations.

▪ Establishment and management of the LAT.

▪ Recruit the Project Management Consultant (PMC) and the licensed independent appraisal

▪ In coordination with GA, o Oversight of the whole land acquisition process based on UU

No.2/2012, and Presidential Decree No. 71 / 2012, and o Application for land use (pinjam pakai) process (IPPKH) from PT

Perum Perhutani based on Ministerial Decree of the Minister for Environment and Forests No. P.27 / Menlhk / Setjen / Kum.1/7/2018

▪ Procurement and management of specialist NGO / consultant services for development of geo-social-spatial information system for 6 Village Governments, and production of a Development Partnership Road Map for GDE Dieng and the local communities.

▪ Sumbmission of social safeguards semi annual monitoring reports to ADB PMU Government Relation and Social Safeguards Assistant Manager under HSE and Safeguard Manager

▪ Responsible for conducting internal social safeguards monitoring and compliance, including implementaion of LRP and reoriented ComDev program activities and reporting

▪ Support the PMU to ensure proper GRM in place and accessible by AHs and communities in project area o Coordinate with PMU concerning effective operation of the GRM.

▪ Support the PMU in the establishment of the LAT.

▪ In coordination with CORSEC, responsible for annual budgeting, budget allocation and implementation of the livelihood restoration and enhancement activities, CSR reorientation and strategic community development activities.

▪ Support the PMU in the procurement and management of specialist NGO / consultant services for development of geo-social-spatial information system for 6 Village Governments, and production of a Development Partnership Road Map for GDE Dieng and the local communities.

▪ Compilation and submission of social safeguards semi-annual monitoring reports to the ADB

Social safeguards and PR Supervisor at Dieng Unit

▪ Support Government Relation and Social Safeguards Assistant Manager for the day-to-day implementation and monitoring of safeguards plans, including implementation of the LRP and ComDev Reorientation activities

▪ Support the GDE LAT in implementation of the whole land acquisition process, including (i). providing information, facilitating consultations and disclosing information to affected communities and APs, (ii) supporting land clearing process including DMS, independent replacement cost appraisal, compensation negotiations and compensation payment process

▪ Supporting the functioning of the grievance redress mechanism. The social safeguard staff will be a member of Grievance Redress Committee

74

ENTITY RESPONSIBLITIES

coordinated by the GA and Finance StafThe social safeguard staff will be a member of Grievance Redress Committee coordinated by the GA and Finance Staf. She will be a

General Affairs (GA) ▪ Support PMU re: land acquisition process, and

▪ Forestry permit (pinjam pakai) process (IPPKH) from PT Perum Perhutani. Corporate Secretariat (CORSEC)

▪ Annual planning, and budget allocation for GDE ComDev program.

▪ Relay grievances sent to info@geodipa.co.id to the PMU.

Project Management Consultant (Social Safeguard/ Resettlement Specialist

▪ Supports the PMU in the management of monitoring and reporting on project compliance with its social safeguards obligations (set out as ADB loan covenants).

▪ Review and update safeguards documents, as needed.

▪ Design and provide training to GDE /PMU Social Safeguards personnel and the contractors on safeguards requirements as per ADB SPS 2009 and in how to bridge gaps between GOI laws and regulations and ADB SPS.

▪ Support GDE/PMU in the preparation of semi-annual safeguards monitoring reports for submission to ADB

▪ Provide training to GDE / PMU Social Safeguards personnel regarding social safeguards requirements as per ABD SPS 2009.

▪ Support the PMU in the recruitment and management of: a) facilitators to facilitate the identification and securing of alternative land

for AHs to lease / purchase after they receive their respective compensation payments;

b) NGO facilitation services to support implementation of the LRP and CDP.

Land Acquisition Team (LAT – ad hoc) 66

▪ In coordination with the safeguards stafff at Dieng in conducting the whole land acquisition and resettlement process, including socialization and consultation, DMS, negotiation, and payment of compensation

▪ In collaboration with PMU HS Social and Enviroment Team in engagement and liaison with government team and other related parties (e.g. the Public Appraisal Office/ KJPP) during the land acquisition and resettlement process

▪ Assist the independent appraisal during identification and inventory of affected land and assets.

▪ Assist in handling complaints related to land acquisition process. Contractors ▪ Manage project impacts during construction including provide

compensation for any damaged or lost assets set forth in the RP.

▪ In coordination with the Grievance Focal Person, resolve grievances during construction period

▪ Report grievance receipt and resolution to the GRM Focal Person at Unit level

▪ Forward grievances that cannot be resolved by the contractor to the Grievance Focal Person

66 Comprises relevant divisions from GDE HQ (GA) and GDE Unit (HC/GA, PR) and

75

75

B. Capacity Building

139. In order to realize the implementation of the social safeguards planning documents, the Social Safeguards/Resettlement Specialist under the PMC shall assist PMU for the RP update if applicable, implementation, and provide capacity building training on social safeguards-related tasks/activities. Training for GDE safeguards teams will be conducted prior to social safeguards planning document full implementation – the first set should be before detailed measurement surveys. Specific topics recommended for the training are.

i. Strengthen knowledge and awareness of stakeholders on provisions in the social safeguards planning documents including ADB SPS 2009 on involuntary resettlement

ii. Requirements and procedure for RP Update as well as understanding use of the detailed measurement survey instruments;

iii. Meaningful consultations and grievance handling. iv. Orientation and finalization of detailed plans for livelihood restoration, plan for

compensation disbursement and its required documentation, and required documentation for grievance handling.

v. Monitoring of resettlement development plan and reporting of compliance and achievement of social safeguards objectives (that AHs do not become worse off).

140. The PMU, handling overall oversight for the project, shall retain adequate staff for handling social safeguards with relevant qualifications and experience to be able to adequately design and deliver the RP

C. Implementation Schedule for RP

141. The Dieng- 2 sub-project land acquisition implementation schedule is presented in Table 23.

Table 23. Land Acquisition Implementation Schedule

No. STEPS TIMELINE A. PLANNING STAGE

1. Community Consultations (Sosialisasi, focus group discussions)

March, May, Aug. Sept. 2019

2. IOL, SES and independent Replacement Cost Study (RCS) Aug. 2019

3. Preparation of RP Aug. – Oct. 2019

4. ADB Review and Approval of RP Oct. – Nov. 2019

5. Disclosure of RP on ADB website Nov. 2019 B. IMPLEMENTATION STAGE

Land Clearing 6. Establishment of Land Clearing Team End of November 2019

7. Verification and Validation of affected asset refer to IOL result prepare by ADB TA consultant

3rd week of Nov – 1st week of Dec 2019

8. Replacement cost assessment by independent appraisal 2nd -3rd week of Dec 2019

9. Negotiation with AHs Dec 2019-January 2020

10. Payment of compensation for loss of income allowance Jan - Feb 2020

Land Acquistion

11. Establishment of GDE Land Acquisition Team (LAT) January 2020

12. Spatial planning conformity March 2020

13. Socialisation and consultation with land owners regarding willingness to sell land.

March 2020

76

No. STEPS TIMELINE

14. Verification of land ownership data by LAT with KATR BPN Banjarnegara

April 2020

15. Independent appraisal of compensation for all affected assets, and report completion

April – May 2020

16. Negotiations to get agreement on amount of compensation for land and affected crops.

June 2020

17. Measurement of sub-project boundary by BPN. July - Aug 2020

18. Update RP document and submit to ADB April – June 2020

19. ADB Review and Approval of updated RP July 2020

20. Disclosure of updated RP Sept 2020

21. Compensation payment to affected land owners Sept.- October 2020 C. LIVELIHOOD RESTORATION / ENHANCEMENT,

CSR REORIENTATION, AND STRATEGIC LIVELIHOOD SECURITY ACTIVITES (COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT) (see Table 9-4)

22. Implementation of Livelihood Restoration Plan (LRP) to address vulnerable and severely affected households

From 2020 onwards in parallel with construction works.

23. Implementation of ComDev Reorientation Activities and new Strategic Livelihood Security Activities (Community Development Plan to generate sub-project benefits)

From 2020 onwards in parallel with LRP and construction works.

D. MONITORING & EVALUATION 24. Semi annual monitoring and reporting periodic

25. External monitoring and reporting First study: In early 2021, 6 months - 1 year after completion of compenstation payments. Second study: In 2023 after completion of LRP implementation.

77

XVII. MONITORING AND REPORTING

A. Internal Monitoring

142. The implementation of the RP will be monitored regularly to ensure that it is implemented as planned and that mitigating measures designed to address adverse social impacts are adequate and effective. The objectives of monitoring are to assess (i) the implementation progress of the land acquisition and resettlement plan activities; and (ii) the impact of the plan activities on income and livelihood of the affected persons, including vulnerable groups.67 143. GDE Headquarters has established a dedicated Project Management Unit (PMU) at the Head Office to oversee project implementation; responsible for project management at implementation as well as monitoring and reporting. Government relations and social safeguards assistant manager under the PMU HSE and Safeguards Manager will be responsible for the monitoring and reporting of social safeguards compliance and will be supported by the PMC. The social safeguards and PR supervisor at Dieng will conduct day to day monitoring of the land acquisition and land clearing process to ensure implementation is in accordance with the action plan set forth in the RP, including LRP implementation. 144. Semi-annual monitoring reports will be prepared by the PMC in discussion and review by government and social safeguards assistant manager of PMU. PMU General Manager is tasked to submit semi-annual monitoring to ADB for review and disclosure. A semi-annual monitoring report template is provided in Appendix 20 and will be attached in the Project Administration Manual. Further monitoring will take place through ADB progress mission, mid-term reviews and others events as may be proposed by ADB and agreed with GeoDipa.

145. The scope of monitoring includes but not limited to:

(i) Compensation payments to all APs in various categories have been completed, according to the compensation policy described in the RP.

(ii) Delivery of livelihood restoration program and social support entitlements, includes delivery of assistance to lease coordinators.

(iii) Public information dissemination and consultations procedures (iv) Adherence to grievance procedures, and resolution of outstanding issues requiring

management’s attention (v) The benefit provided from the project (vi) Ability of AH’s to re-establish their livelihoods and living standards (vii) Assess if RP activities achieved the intended objectives; measure resettlement outcomes

against baseline condition

67 ADB.2019. ADB Source Book on Involuntary Resettlement. 2013.

B. Internal Monitoring Indicators 146. Monitoring indicators adress the specific contents of the RP activities and entitlement matrix. Potential monitoring indicators, from which specific indicators, can be developed and refined as applicable to the pertinent social safeguard planning document, are set out in table 24.

Table 24. Suggested Internal Monitoring Parameters and Indicators

Monitoring parameters Suggested indicators

Consultation and Grievances

• Consultations organized as scheduled including meetings, groups, and community activities.

• Knowledge of entitlements by the APs (of women, men, and other vulnerable groups).

• Use of the grievance redress mechanism by the APs (of women, men, and other vulnerable groups).

• Information on the resolution of the grievances.

• Information on the implementation of the social preparation phase.

• Implementation of special measures for customary communities. Communication and Participation

• Number of general meetings (for women, men, and other vulnerable groups). • Number of meetings exclusively with customary communities.

• Percentage of women out of total participants. • Number of meetings exclusively with women. • Number of meetings exclusively with vulnerable groups. • Number of meetings between hosts and the APs.

• Level of participation in meetings (of customary communities, women, men, and other vulnerable groups).

• Level and adequacy of information communicated.

• Information disclosure.

• Translation of information disclosed in the local languages. Delivery of Entitlements

• Entitlements disbursed, compared with number and category of losses set out in the entitlement matrix.

• Disbursements against timelines. • Identification of APs losing land temporarily, e.g. through soil disposal,

borrow pits, contractors’ camps, have been included.

• Timely disbursements of the agreed transport costs, income substitution support, and any resettlement allowances, according to schedule.

• Provision of replacement land plots.

• Quality of new plots and issuance of land titles.

• Restoration of social infrastructure and services.

• Progress on income and livelihood restoration activities being implemented as set out in the income restoration plan.

• Affected businesses receiving entitlements, including transfer and payments for net losses resulting from lost business.

Budget and Time Frame

• Social safeguards staff appointed and mobilized on schedule for field and office work.

• Capacity building and training activities completed on schedule.

• Achieving resettlement and customary community implementation activities against the agreed implementation plan.

• Funds allocation for resettlement-to-resettlement agencies on time.

• Receipt of scheduled funds by resettlement offices.

• Funds disbursement according to the RP/DDR

79

Monitoring parameters Suggested indicators

• Social preparation phase as per schedule.

• Land acquisition and occupation in time for implementation.

Livelihood and Income Restoration

• Number of APs under the rehabilitation programs (customary communities, women, men, and vulnerable groups).

• Number of APs who received vocational training (customary communities, women, men, and vulnerable groups).

• Types of training and number of participants in each program.

• Number and percentage of APs covered under livelihood programs (customary communities, women, men, and vulnerable groups).

• Number of APs who have restored their income and livelihood patterns (customary communities, women, men, and vulnerable groups).

• Number of new employment activities.

• Extent of participation in rehabilitation programs.

• Extent of participation in vocational training programs.

• Degree of satisfaction with support received for livelihood programs.

• Percentage of successful enterprises breaking even (customary communities, women, men, and vulnerable groups).

• Percentage of APs who improved their income (customary communities, women, men, and vulnerable groups)

• Percentage of APs who improved their standard of living (customary communities, women, men, and vulnerable groups)

• Number of APs with replacement agriculture land (customary communities, women, men, and vulnerable groups)

• Quantity of land owned/contracted by APs (customary communities, women, men, and vulnerable groups)

• Number of households with agricultural equipment

• Number of households with livestock

Benefit Monitoring • Noticeable changes in patterns of occupation, production, and resource use compared to the pre-project situation.

• Noticeable changes in income and expenditure patterns compared to the pre-project situation.

• Changes in cost of living compared to the pre-project situation.

• Changes in key social and cultural parameters relating to living standards.

• Changes occurred on customary communities and other vulnerable groups benefiting from the project.

C. External Monitoring

147. The task of the External Monitoring Agency (EMA) will focus on the resettlement compliance and assessment of the degree of rehabilitation achieved by the APs in the year following RP implementation. Considering the high number of severely and vulernable APs and the concerns of APs regarding project impacts to their livelihood, the PMU will hire a qualified external monitoring agency to carry external monitoring and post-implementation evaluation. The terms of reference (TOR) for this purpose is shown in Appendix 21. Both the TOR for the EMA and the selection of the EMA will be referred to ADB for review. The EMA will conduct evaluation study twice; (i) first monitoring conducted 6 months to 1 year after compensation payment; and (ii) second monitoring after the LRP has completed. 148. The EMA will conduct the following activities;

i) Review the SES baseline data, and related indicators ii) Verify and document of negotiated land acquisistion iii) Assess the livelihood impact of the land acquisition/resettlement on the APs through

formal and informal surveys with the population in project areas affected and non-affected. The assessment should be inclusive of gender concerns and ADB policy.

iv) Assess longer term satisfaction with the valuation of assets and entitlements, timing of payments, fund availability and disbursements

v) Assess the involuntary resettlement safeguard compliance issues and if any significant involuntary resettlement issues are identified, a corrective action plan will be prepared to address such issues.

vi) Assess the long-term efficiency, effectiveness and sustainability of the land acquisition / resettlement program, drawing lessons for future resettlement policy formulation and planning and future RP planning and implementation

vii) Preparation of the evaluation report based on the assessment and incorporate all documents during the evaluation including meetings / interviews with the APs both men and women, evaluation instruments, etc.

149. If the findings of the study indicate that the objectives of the RP have not been achieved, the EMA will propose appropriate additional measures to help the severely affected APs rehabilitate themselves to at least their pre-project situation. The EMA will likewise provide recommendations for improving resettlement implementation in the future

Table 25. Suggested External Monitoring Indicators

Monitoring Indicators Basis for Indicators 1. Basic

information on AP households

• Location • Composition and structures, ages, education and skill levels • Gender of household head • Ethnic affiliation • Access to health, education, utilities and other social services • Housing type • Land use and other resource ownership patterns • Occupation and employment patterns • Income sources and levels • Agricultural production data (for rural households) • Participation in neighborhood or community groups • Access to cultural sites and events • Value of all assets forming entitlements and resettlement

entitlements 2. Benefit

Monitoring • What changes have occurred in terms of patterns of occupation,

production, and resource use compared to the pre-project situation? • What changes have occurred in income and expenditure patterns

compared to the pre-project situation? • What have been the changes in cost of living compared to the pre-project

situation? • Have APs’ incomes kept pace with these changes? • What changes have taken place in key social and cultural parameters

relating to living standards? 3. Restoration of

Livelihoods • Were valuations for all types of affected assets is based on replacement

cost principles • Were compensation payments free of deduction for

depreciation, fees or transfer costs to the APs

81

Monitoring Indicators Basis for Indicators

• Were compensation payments sufficient to replace lost assets? • Was sufficient replacement land available of suitable standard? • Did income substitution allow for re-establish/restore livelihoods

and living standards/ • Were affected public facilities compensated or replaced • Have vulnerable groups been provided income-earning

opportunities? Are these effective and sustainable? • Do jobs provided restore pre-project income levels and living

standards? 4. Levels of AP

Satisfaction • How much do APs know about resettlement procedures and

entitlements? • Do APs know their entitlements? • Do they know if these have been met? • How much does the APs participate in the public consultation meetings to

discuss and reach agreements on project potential impacts, compensation, assistance, and relocation?

• How do APs assess the extent to which their own living standards and livelihood been restored?

• How much do APs know about grievance procedures and conflict resolution procedures? How satisfied are those who have used said mechanisms?

5. Effectiveness of Resettlement Planning

• Were the APs and their assets correctly enumerated? • Were any land speculators assisted? • Was the time frame and budget sufficient to meet objectives? • Were entitlements too generous? • Were vulnerable groups identified and assisted? • How did resettlement implementers deal with unforeseen

problems? 6. Other impacts • Were there unintended environmental impacts?

• Were there unintended impacts on employment or incomes? • Were there any unintended impacts on Geodipa?

D. Reporting and Disclosure

150. GDE/PMU is required to prepare semi-annual internal monitoring reports for submission to ADB. Internal monitoring reports are subject to review by ADB and posted on the ADB website and project website, if applicable. PMU through the General Manager Project Dieng shall disclose results of monitoring specifically to the affected communities/persons in summary form - status of the social safeguards planning document, information on benefits sharing, and corrective action plans, if any. Community disclosures will be in Bahasa Indonesia and posted at a location commonly agreed with AHs and village leaders. 151. External monitroing and post evaluation reports will be submitted by EMA to the PMU, and the PMU will submit the reports to ADB in english version for review. The final external monotoring report and post evaluation report will be posted on the ADB and Project websites.

APPENDICES

Appendix 1: Status of Land Certification of Geo Dipa-owned land required for the Dieng-2 sub-project.

No

Sub-Project Component

Description of Geodipa-owned land

housing the sub-project component

Details of land ownership (Type of ownership papers) Date Process commenced

Estimated data for

completion of land

certification process

files

1 Reactivation of Well 10A

Existing Wellpad 10 1. Inbreng Pertamina berupa Peta Situasi (Pad-10) a. Peta situasi Pertamina (luas 37.580 m2) b. Peta situasi Pertamina (luas 31.700 m2)

1. Q4 2019 1.Q4 2020 1.Proses sertipikat

2 Existing pipeline route from Wellpad 10 to Wellpad 7

Existing ROW from Wellpad 10 to Wellpad 7

1. Inbreng Pertamina berupa Peta Situasi (Pad-10) a. Peta situasi Pertamina (luas 37.580 m2) b. Peta situasi Pertamina (luas 31.700 m2)

2. WPS Sidolog

a. Sertipikat HGB No.00003/Karangtengah (luas 725 m2) b. Sertipikat HGB No.00225/Kepakisan (luas 1.736 m2)

3. Pad 29 to pad 7 (tie in)

a. Sertipikat HGB No.00220/Karangtengah (luas 7.910 m2) b. Sertipikat HGB No.00222/Karangtengah (luas 1.435 m2) c. Sertipikat HGB No.00224/Karangtengah (luas 1.997 m2) d. Sertipikat HGB No.00001/Kepakisan (luas 3.187 m2) e. Sertipikat HGB No.00002/Kepakisan (luas 548 m2)

1. Q4 2019

2. Final

3.Final

1.Q4 2020 2.Final 3. Final

1. Proses sertipikat

2. Final a. Sertipikat HGB-00003 sd. 2048 b. Sertipikat HGB-00225 sd. 2045 3. Final a. Sertipikat HGB-00220 sd. 2045 b. Sertipikat HGB-00222 sd. 2045 c. Sertipikat HGB-00224 sd.2045 d. Sertipikat HGB-00001 sd. 2045 e. Sertipikat HGB-00002 sd. 2045

3 Drilling of new well 7D

In existing Wellpad 7 1. Sertifikat HGB No.00229/Karangtengah (luas 13.884 m2) 1.final 1.final 1. Sertifikat HGB-00229 sd. 2048

4 Existing pipeline route from Wellpad 7 to Wellpad 9

Existing ROW between Wellpad 7 and Wellpad 9.

1. Bantuan Pemerintah yang Belum Ditentukan Statusnya (BPYBDS) atau PMN (Penyertaan Modal Negara) luas 14.390 m2 2. Bantuan Pemerintah yang Belum Ditentukan Statusnya (BPYBDS) atau PMN (Penyertaan Modal Negara) luas 12.625 m2 3. Sertifikat HGB No.00227/Karangtengah (luas 14.101 m2)

1. Q1 2019 2. Q1 2019 3.Final

1. Q4 2019 2. Q4 2019 3.Final

1. Proses sertipikat 2. Proses sertipikat 3. Sertifikat HGB-00227 sd. 2048

5 Drilling 4 new wells - 9C, 9D, 9E and 9F.

In existing Wellpad 9 1. Sertifikat HGB No.00227/Karangtengah (luas 14.101 m2) 1.Final 1.Final 1. Sertifikat HGB-00227 sd. 2048

6 Existing pipeline route from tri-junction to Wellpad 31

Existing ROW from tri-junction to Wellpad 30.

1. Bantuan Pemerintah yang Belum Ditentukan Statusnya (BPYBDS) atau PMN (Penyertaan Modal Negara) luas 13.120 m2 2. Bantuan Pemerintah yang Belum Ditentukan Statusnya (BPYBDS) atau PMN (Penyertaan Modal Negara) luas 13.790 m2 3. Bantuan Pemerintah yang Belum Ditentukan Statusnya (BPYBDS) atau PMN (Penyertaan Modal Negara) luas 14.390 m2

1. Q1 2019 2. Q1 2019 3. Q1 2019

1. Q4 2019 2. Q4 2019 3. Q4 2019

1.Proses sertipikat 2.Proses sertipikat 3.Proses sertipikat

7 Drilling of new well 30B

In existing wellpad 30. 1. Bantuan Pemerintah yang Belum Ditentukan Statusnya (BPYBDS) atau PMN (Penyertaan Modal Negara) luas 31.948 m2

1. Q1 2019 1. Q4 2019 1. Proses sertipikat

8 Existing pipeline from Wellpad 30 to Wellpad 31

Existing ROW from Wellpad 30 to 31.

1. Bantuan Pemerintah yang Belum Ditentukan Statusnya (BPYBDS) atau PMN (Penyertaan Modal Negara) luas 31.948 m2

1. Q1 2019

1. Q4 2019

1.proses sertipikat

No

Sub-Project Component

Description of Geodipa-owned land

housing the sub-project component

Details of land ownership (Type of ownership papers) Date Process commenced

Estimated data for

completion of land

certification process

files

2. Sertifikat HGB No.00223/Karangtengah (luas 6.733 m2) 3. Sertifikat HGB No.00221/Karangtengah (luas 322 m2) 4. Sertifikat HGB No.00004/Diengkulon (luas 4.910 m2) 5. Sertifikat HGB No.00226/Karangtengah (luas 11.960 m2) 6. Sertifikat HGB No.00228/Karangtengah (luas 4.600 m2) 7. Sertifikat HGB No.00630/Karangtengah (luas 12.000 m2) 8. Bantuan Pemerintah yang Belum Ditentukan Statusnya (BPYBDS) atau PMN (Penyertaan Modal Negara) luas 69.350 m2

2. Final 3. Final 4. Final 5. Final 6. Final 7. Q3 2019 8. Q1 2019

2. Final 3. Final 4. Final 5. Final 6. Final 7. Q4 2020 8. Q4 2019

2. Sertifikat HGB-00223 sd. 2045 3. Sertifikat HGB-00221 sd. 2045 4. Sertifikat HGB-00004 sd. 2045 5. Sertifikat HGB-00226 sd. 2048 6. Sertifikat HGB-00228 sd. 2048 7.Proses balik nama sertipikat 8.Proses sertipikasi

9 Drilling of 2 new wells – 31A and 31B.

In existing Wellpad 31. 1. Bantuan Pemerintah yang Belum Ditentukan Statusnya (BPYBDS) atau PMN (Penyertaan Modal Negara) luas 69.350 m2

1. Q1 2019 1. Q4 2019 1. Proses sertipikasi

10 Construction of Dieng-2 Power Plant

In existing Geodipa-owned land (Mess PLN)

1. Sertifikat HGB No.217/Karangtengah (luas 11.477 m2) 2. Sertifikat HGB No.218/Karangtengah (luas 47.851 m2)

1.Final 2.Final

1.Final 2.Final

1. Sertifikat HGB No.217 sd. 2034 2. Sertifikat HGB No.218 sd. 2034

11 Laying of underground transmission lines from Dieng-2 Power Plant via Wellpad 28

In new ROW from Dieng-2 Power Plant to Wellpad 9, and then along existing ROW to sub-station via Wellpad 28

1. Sertifikat HGB No.217/Karangtengah (luas 11.477 m2) 2. Sertifikat HGB No.218/Karangtengah (luas 47.851 m2) 3. Sertifikat HGB No.00227/Karangtengah (luas 14.101 m2) 4. Bantuan Pemerintah yang Belum Ditentukan Statusnya (BPYBDS) atau PMM (Penyertaan Modal Negara) luas 12.625 m2 5. Bantuan Pemerintah yang Belum Ditentukan Statusnya (BPYBDS) atau PMM (Penyertaan Modal Negara) luas 14.390 m2 6. Bantuan Pemerintah yang Belum Ditentukan Statusnya (BPYBDS) atau PMM (Penyertaan Modal Negara) luas 13.790 m2 7. Bantuan Pemerintah yang Belum Ditentukan Statusnya (BPYBDS) atau PMM (Penyertaan Modal Negara) luas 13.120 m2 8. Bantuan Pemerintah yang Belum Ditentukan Statusnya (BPYBDS) atau PMM (Penyertaan Modal Negara) luas 69.350 m2 9. Sertifikat HGB No.00630/Karangtengah (luas 12.000 m2) 10. Bantuan Pemerintah yang Belum Ditentukan Statusnya (BPYBDS) atau PMM (Penyertaan Modal Negara) luas 30.643 m2 11. IPPKH SK.319/Menhut-II/2013 (Perluasan lokasi pad 6 luas 740 m2) 12. Bantuan Pemerintah yang Belum Ditentukan Statusnya (BPYBDS) atau PMM (Penyertaan Modal Negara) luas 7.597 m2 13. IPPKH SK.319/Menhut-II/2013 (Jalur Pipa Air luas 730 m2) 14. IPPKH SK.319/Menhut-II/2013 (PAD-1 roocmuffler luas 21.958 m2) 15. Sertifikat HP No.00021/Sikunang (luas 55.688 m2) 16. Sertifikat HGB No.00001/Sikunang (luas 10.683 m2)

1.Final 2.Final 3.Final 4. Q1 2019 5. Q1 2019 6. Q1 2019 7. Q1 2019 8. Q1 2019 9.Q3 2019 10. Q1 2019 11. IPPKH 12. Q1 2019 13.IPPKH 14.IPPKH 15.Final 16 Final

1.Final 2.Final 3.Final 4. Q4 2019 5. Q4 2019 6. Q4 2019 7. Q4 2019 8. Q4 2019 9.Q4 2020 10. Q4 2019 11. IPPKH 12. Q4 2019 13.IPPKH 14.IPPKH 15.Final 16.Final

1. Sertifikat HGB No.217 sd. 2034 2. Sertifikat HGB No.218 sd.2034 3. Sertifikat HGB No.00227 sd. 2048 4. Proses sertipikat 5. Proses sertipikat 6. Proses sertipikat 7. Proses sertipikat 8. Proses sertipikat 9. Proses balik nama sertipikat 10. Proses sertipikat 11. SK.319/Menhut-II/2013 sd. 2037 12. Proses sertipikat 13. SK.319/Menhut-II/2013 sd. 2037 14. SK.319/Menhut-II/2013 sd.2037 15. Sertifikat HP No.00021 sd.2043 16. Sertifikat HGB No.00001 sd.2024

SURAT PERJANIAN SEWA TANAH

(NOT FOR THE DISCLOSURE)

1

Appendix 3: INVENTORY OF LOSSES OF AFFECTED HOUSEHOLDS (AHs)

INSTRUCTION: To be accomplished for

i) persons/households/clans/institutions that are affected by the entire or partial loss of their residential/agricultural land/garden located within construction limit specified by GDE for the proposed Geothermal Facilities including the transmission line and alternative road constructed for the project).;

ii) persons/households/ institutions that are losing their structures(i.e., house, waiting sheds, secondary structures) and trees/crops/timbers

iii) those persons/households/ institutions that are losing a portion of or entirely things attached to the land and public facilities (road, irrigation channels, electricity pole, water pipe and installation, schools, churches, mosques, etc);

iv) persons/households/clans/institutions that are losing other appraisable losses:

a. loss of or restricted access to forest area for hunting, fishing, and other livelihood

b. loss of business income, jobs, and change of profession

Survey Code: __________________

I. Location of the affected asset of the affected person (AP), affected household (AH), or organization

Name* of Occupant/Owner of the Affected Asset(s):

Mobile Number (optional):

Type of losses:

[ ] Loss of land [ ] loss of structures/buildings [ ] loss of trees/crops/timbers [ ] things attached to the land and public facilities [ ] above and underground space [ ] other appraisable losses

Location of affected asset(s):

District: …………………………. Sub-district: …………………………. village/ Kampong: …………………………. Sub Kampong: …………………………. RW/RT: …………………………., Coordinates :

To be used for the main project components:

[ ] well pad [ ] power plant [ ] access road [ ] transmision pipe [ ] transmission line [ ] Other: ………………………….

*NOTE: If a single-person household, write the name of the AP; if an AH, write the name of the head of the AH. A person who lives alone by himself/herself is considered a single-person household. .

II. Affected Assets (This section will be filled-out for all AHs affected by the loss of assets)

A.1 Land:

Classification/ Use of Land*

Area and Tenure Status Over the Affected Land (indicate area of affected portion of the land [m²] in appropriate box below)

Total Area of

Occupied/ Owned

Land (m²)

Property Right (Hak

Milik, Certificate/

Girik)

Management Right (Hak Pengelolaan

Leasehold (Hak Guna

Usaha)

Right to construct

on somebody else’s land (Hak Guna Bangunan)

Right to use land (Hak

Pakai)

Customary right (adat, ulayat, or

yasan)

Occupying without

permission from land

owner

1.

2.

*Examples of land classification or use: residential, commercial, farmland, forestland, institutional (e.g.., office, school, religious)

A.2 If renting or occupying the affected land with permission from the land owner (i.e., occupant holds leasing agreement, a hak pengusahaan hutan,, , and hak pakai):

With Lease Agreement (Renting)

Address/Location of Land Owner Check the box below if

not paying rent Name of Land Owner Amount of rental fee

(Indicate in Rp)

1.

2.

A.3. Information on other landholdings of the AP/AH that are not affected by the project:

2

Specifics Other land holdings but are not affected by the Project

Residential Commercial Agricultural Production forest Pond

Tenure status*

Total area (m²)

*Specifics of tenure status: with sertifikat hak milik, hak guna usaha, hak guna bangunan,hak pakai, adat, ulayat, yasan

B.1 Main structures*

Type or use of the affected main structure**

Structure

Classification***

Total area (m²) of the Structure

Area (m²) of the affected portion of

the structure

State whether the structure will have to be acquired/affected PARTIALLY or

TOTALLY

*Main structures: Regardless of structural condition and construction materials used, these are buildings that are fixed on the ground with at least four posts, with roof, and used as residence, shop or place of commerce, residence and shop at the same time, etc.

** Use of main structure: Examples are “house”, “shop”, “house-shop”. ***Specifics of classification: Use structure classification system of the local government (district or township).

B.2 Tenure status over the affected main structures:

Main Structure

Tenure (check the appropriate box below)

Owner Tenant/

Renter

Occupying WITH permission of owner

Occupying WITHOUT permission of owner

[ ]

[ ]

[ ]

[ ]

B.3 If the affected house/store/building does not belong to the AP/AH:

1. Name of owner of affected main structure

Address of owner of affected main structure

Paying Rent? Check appropriate box below

If Paying Rent, How much is Monthly Rent? (Indicate

in Rp) No Yes

[ ]

[ ]

2. Does the tenant AH own a house/building elsewhere? [ ] No [ ] Yes, location:

_______________________________________________

C. Secondary structures*:

Type of affected secondary structure Structure Classification** Total area (m²) / length (lm) of

the structure Affected area (m²) / length (lm)

of the structure

1.

2.

3.

*Secondary structures: Structures that are not moveable and not part of the main structures, such as fence, driveway, waiting sheds, farm sheds, irrigation canal, etc.

** Specifics of classification: Use structure classification system of the local government (district or township).

D. Type and number (count) of perennials on the affected land:

Name of perennial Young and not yet bearing fruit

Bearing fruit (within age of peak production

Bearing fruit (old)

1.

2.

3.

4.

3

Total

E. Annual crops found on the affected land:

Name / type of annual crops* Actual area planted to the crop (m²) during IOL

Net Yearly Income (Rp) Duration of Disruption Check appropriate box)

Permanent Temporary

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

* Examples of annual crops: rice, corn, sugarcane, cassava, etc.

F. Type and count of timber trees found on the affected land:

Name of tree Categories* of timber trees

A B C D

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

Total

* Specifics of categories: Use categories of the kabupaten

G. Loss of business,job and income:

Nature of Business/Job Net Monthly Income (Rp)

Duration of Disruption in Business Operation or Job

Paid Workers (if any)

Permanent Temporary Number Average Monthly Salary

of Workers (Rp)

1.

2.

* Examples of business: motor vehicle repair shop, grocery store, eatery, etc.

** Permanent: No more space to re-organize the business. Therefore, it will stop operation permanently even after construction.

H. Sketch Map of plots of land owned / being cultivated within piece of land to be acquired

………………………….………………………….………………………….

………………………….

Name and Signature/Thumb Print of AH or Representative Relationship with the AH

………………………….………………………….…………………………

Name and Signature of Enumerator Date accomplished: ………………………….

4

Sample of sketch map of each piece of land to be acquired, and label each parcel of land owned by the different affected land owners or land

users

POS

L=1587m2

L=1905m2

L=3261m2

L=4706m2

L=4153m2

L=6241m2

L=772m2

L=834m2

L=617m2

L=227m2L=267m2L=293m2

Sugito (Hibah)

Well Pad 9

= New Corridor Plan

Remark :

Existin

g p

ipe

line

A

Tu

rmu

di

Selamet

DESCRIPTI ONBYNO. DATE

REVISIONS

Phone:

Contact :

Email:

N

LAND ACQUISITION MAP

SCALE 1 : 1000

SUPPORT FOR INVENTORY OF LOSSES CENSUS

FOR DIENG GEOTHERMAL ENERGY DVELOPMENT PROJECT

WONOSOBO & BANJARNEGARA DISTRICTS - CENTRAL JAVA

PROJECT :

Budi Gunarta

budi.gunarta@yahoo.co.id

#24PT GEO DIPA ENERGY

POS

B

B

B

B

B

B

KOLAM

KOLAM

Mes PLN L=1587m2

L=1905m2

L=3261m2

L=4706m2

L=4153m2

L=834m2

L=617m2

L=227m2L=267m2L=293m2

Sugito (Hibah)

L=58.479 m2

Sujito

Sujito

Sartono

Ngadi Sukur

Juhari

Mardi

Haryadi

Soib

MahtumYunianto

Tuyono/Amin

Gito

Arifin Mintono

Mintono

Surono

Selamet

Tu

rmu

di

Darminto

Muhoyib

Marzuki

Komaludin

Haryadi

Abdul Syukur

-

H Muhoyib

Turmudi

Khuryadi

Siib (Ibnu Hadi)

1

7

8

1

24

1922

15

15

12

173

8

2111

11

18

14

6 135

5

9

10

4

2

20

23

DESCRIPTI ONBYNO. DATE

REVISIONS

Phone:

Contact :

Email:

N

NOT TO SCALE

SUPPORT FOR INVENTORY OF LOSSES CENSUS

FOR DIENG GEOTHERMAL ENERGY DVELOPMENT PROJECT

WONOSOBO & BANJARNEGARA DISTRICTS - CENTRAL JAVA

PROJECT :

Budi Gunarta

budi.gunarta@yahoo.co.id

#25PT GEO DIPA ENERGY

DIENG-2 POWER PLANT

(LAND OF 24 TENANT FARMER)

No Name Adress Areas (m2)

1 H. Muhoyib Dsn. Karang Tengah, Ds Karang Tengah, Batur, Banjarnegara3000

2 Selamet Dsn. Karang Tengah, Ds Karang Tengah, Batur, Banjarnegara2520

3 Darminto Dsn. Karang Tengah, Ds Karang Tengah, Batur, Banjarnegara2500

4 Sugito Dsn. Karang Tengah, Ds Karang Tengah, Batur, Banjarnegara2500

5 Mintono Dsn. Karang Tengah, Ds Karang Tengah, Batur, Banjarnegara2500

6 Yunianto Dsn. Karang Tengah, Ds Karang Tengah, Batur, Banjarnegara2500

7 Abdul Sukur Dsn. Karang Tengah, Ds Karang Tengah, Batur, Banjarnegara2500

8 Turmudi Dsn. Karang Tengah, Ds Karang Tengah, Batur, Banjarnegara2205

9 Khuryadi Dsn. Karang Tengah, Ds Karang Tengah, Batur, Banjarnegara1800

10 Arifin Dsn. Karang Tengah, Ds Karang Tengah, Batur, Banjarnegara1800

11 Sujito Dsn. Simpangan, Ds Karang Tengah, Batur, Banjarnegara1800

12 Mardi Dsn. Karang Tengah, Ds Karang Tengah, Batur, Banjarnegara1680

13 Mahtum Dsn. Karang Tengah, Ds Karang Tengah, Batur, Banjarnegara1617

14 Juhari Dsn. Karang Tengah, Ds Karang Tengah, Batur, Banjarnegara1617

15 Haryadi Dsn. Karang Tengah, Ds Karang Tengah, Batur, Banjarnegara1320

16 Supyanto* Dsn. Karang Tengah, Ds Karang Tengah, Batur, Banjarnegara1200

17 Ngadi Sukur Dsn. Karang Tengah, Ds Karang Tengah, Batur, Banjarnegara1200

18 Soib Dsn. Karang Tengah, Ds Karang Tengah, Batur, Banjarnegara1020

19 Komaludin Dsn. Karang Tengah, Ds Karang Tengah, Batur, Banjarnegara1020

20 Amin Dsn. Karang Tengah, Ds Karang Tengah, Batur, Banjarnegara960

21 Sarta Dsn. Karang Tengah, Ds Karang Tengah, Batur, Banjarnegara840

22 Siib Dsn. Karang Tengah, Ds Karang Tengah, Batur, Banjarnegara840

23 Surono Dsn. Karang Tengah, Ds Karang Tengah, Batur, Banjarnegara640

24 Marzuki Dsn. Karang Tengah, Ds Karang Tengah, Batur, Banjarnegara1875

TOTAL40254

TENANT FARMERS ON THE POWER PLANT PROPOSE AREA

*Supyanto Sewa lahan di luar Mess PLN ( sebelah timur WP9 )

Tanaman Kentang Pak Jarwo

Tanaman Kentang

Jalan aspal

Jalan aspal

L= 471m2

L=1236m2

Existing pipelineExisting pipeline

DESCRIPTI ONBYNO. DATE

REVISIONS

Phone:

Contact :

Email:

N

MAP OF CROPPER IN PIPELINE ROW

Scale 1 : 500

SUPPORT FOR INVENTORY OF LOSSES CENSUS

FOR DIENG GEOTHERMAL ENERGY DVELOPMENT PROJECT

WONOSOBO & BANJARNEGARA DISTRICTS - CENTRAL JAVA

PROJECT :

Budi Gunarta

budi.gunarta@yahoo.co.id

#31PT GEO DIPA ENERGY

(BETWEEN PAD10-PAD 7)

PAD 10PAD 7

List of APs, Their Losses and Socio Economic Profile

NO. NAME AGENo. of family

members

Size of own

land

cultivated

around

corridor to to

be acquired

(m2)

Size of other

own land

(m2)

Size of land to

be acquired

by Project

(m2)

Size of rented

land to be

cleared by

Project (m2)

Monthly

income from

own land

(Rp.)

Monthly

income from

rented land

(Rp.)

Monthly

income from

farm labor

(Rp.)

Montly

income from

other sources

(wife) (Rp)

Estimate of

monthly HH

income (Rp.)

Estimated loss

from land

acquisition or

land clearing

(%)

Severely

affected ?Vulnerable ?

Tenant Farmers (penyewa) of GDE land (mess PLN)

1 Hj. Muhoyib 58 4 50.000 3.000 200 juta 6% No No

2 Slamet 42 4 1.800 2.520 1.800.000 4.220.000 625.000 6.645.000 63,50% Yes No

3 Darminto 62 2 1.200 2.500 1.625.000 780.000 1.050.000 3.455.000 47% Yes elderly

4 Gito (Sugito) 38 6 1.600 2.500 1.250.000 800.000 600.000 2.650.000 47% Yes No

5 Mintono 62 2 2.500 3.000.000 1.500.000 4.500.000 100% Yes elderly + landless

6 Yunianto 50 4 2.000 2.500 2.625.000 5.000.000 7.625.000 65,60% Yes No

7 Abdul Sukur 36 4 1.250 2.500 454.000 908.000 500.000 1.862.000 48,80% Yes No

8 Turmudi 67 3 2.205 1.483.000 225.000 1.708.000 87% Yes elderly + landless

9 Khuryadi 42 5 1.800 718.000 600.000 1.318.000 47% Yes poor + landless

10 Arifin 36 4 900 1.800 825.000 3.540.000 450.000 4.815.000 72,70% Yes No

11 Sujito 55 4 1.800 3.375.000 120.000 3.495.000 100% Yes landless

12 Mardi 55 2 1.680 1.358.300 1.358.300 100% Yes landless

13 Mahtum 46 4 750 1.617 350.000 150.000 500.000 68% Yes poor

14 Juhari 37 5 1.250 1.617 676.000 875.000 1.551.000 56% Yes poor

15 Haryadi 46 3 5 parcels > land

leased from

Geodipa

1.320 11.500.000 3.500.000 15.000.000 23,30% Yes No

16 Supyanto* 45 3 1.500 1.200 1.500.000 1.875.000 3.375.000 55,60%

17 Ngadi Sukur 67 2 1.020 625.000 625.000 100% Yes elderly + landless

18 Soib 32 4 1.020 875.000 1.000.000 1.875.000 47% Yes landless

19 Komaludin 39 4 1.020 1.200.000 210.000 1.410.000 100% Yes landless

20 Amin 40 2 960 2.300.000 2.300.000 100% Yes landless

21 Sartono 54 4 840 2.000.000 1.000.000 3.000.000 100% Yes landless

22 Siib (Ibnu Hadi) 35 4 840 hutang 0 100% Yes poor + landless

23 Surono 39 3 3.100 640 3.000.000 500.000 350.000 3.850.000 13% Yes No

24 Marzuki 48 3 1.250 1.875 4.750.000 5.750.000 10.500.000 55% Yes No

Land Owners (land acquisition)

25 Tuyono 59 4 4.706 2.612 617 7.175.000 7.175.000 8% No No

26 Rudi Slamet 50 5 3.261 227 19.487.500 19.487.500 7% No No

27 Muh Hilal 38 6 1.587 267 3.425.000 1.000.000 4.425.000 17% Yes No

28 Budiyono 43 2 6.241 722 18.500.000 18.500.000 12% Yes No

29 Sugiyanto 48 4 1.905 2.450 293 4.206.250 3.000.000 7.206.250 7% No No

4 Sugito 38 6 4.153 1.600 834 1.250.000 800.000 600.000

Total (1) 106

Land user (no lease agreement)

30 Sujarwo NA NA NA NA 471 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA No

Four Coordinators of above-mentioned 24 tenant farmers

Note:

31 Nasrullah 7 Double counting of Sugito (as land owner as well as penyewa)

32 Salno 6

33 Ngun wan 4 4 cases where wives contribute to household income.

34 Mugiyono 4

Total (2) 21

Total no. of APs (1+2) 124

Severely affected 24 AHs 86 APs

Vulnerable 14 AHs 47 APs

poor 2 AHs 9 APs

poor and landless 2 AHs 9 APs

landless 6 AHs 20 APs

elderly and landless 3 AHs 7 APs

elderly 1 AH 2 APs

Severely affected and

vulnerable

14 AHs 48 APs

Vulnerability Profile (at risk of impoverishment)

* Bpk Supyanto's data has been removed from the

analysis. While he was registered as a tenant farmer,

the IOL documented that he was cultivating land

outside of the mess PLN site. This finding was also

confirmed by the independent appraiser.

Socio Economic Survey Questionnaire

INSTRUCTION: To be accomplished only for persons/households that are affected by the entire or partial loss of house, store,

and building located inside the Geothermal covered area, and those persons/households that are losing a portion of, or entirely,

their residential, commercial, agricultural, or forest lands. This form will NOT be filled up for APs (affected persons)/AHs

(affected households) that are affected ONLY by the partial or entire loss of secondary structures, such as fence, culvert

(driveway into the residence), wells, etc. This form will also not be filled up for organizations and institutions that are affected by

the loss of asset

I. Basic information about the head of the AH

1. Name: 2. Home address: Village/Township:

3. Gender: a. Male b. Female 4. Age:_________ 5. Physical condition: a. Normal b. Disabled

6. Civil status: a. Single b. Married c. Widow/Widower d. Divorced

7. Educational attainment: 8. Main livelihood activity of the head of AH:

a. ___________________________________________ (specify)

b. No work/looking for work c. Retired/not looking for work

9. Lenght stay at project area :........years 10. Length of using GDEs land (with or without permission) : ................(years)

II. Socioeconomic information on the AH

1. Number of persons presently living with the household: (specify number) ______

2. Basic information on persons presently and actually living with the AH:

Household member Relationship with head

of AH Age Gender

Educational

attainment Main Livelihood activity

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

3. Average monthly income of the AH (combined from all members): Rp____________ 4. Average monthly savings: a. Rp_____________ b.

None

2

5. Income Calender ( Last 12 months )

Desecription LAST HARVEST (_____2019) PREVIOUS HARVEST

(________ 2018)

PREVIOUS HARVEST

(_______2018)

TOTAL (per last 12 months)

Perennials

Annual Crops

Income (gross)

Harvest volume (quintalsl / ton)

Market price / kg

Total Income

Capital/Expenditure

Manure

Urea

Pesticide

Farm labor

Total Expenditure

Income (net)

Income as farm labor (if any)

Other income

3

6. Please estimate how much of the average monthly income of the AH goes to the following expense items (in Rp):

a. Food: _____ b. Clothing: _____ c. Health: _____ d. House maintenance: _____ e. Education: _____ f. Savings/investment:_____ g.

Agriculture expenditure _____

7. Health concerns:

a. Most common ailments (not-serious) that afflicted members of the AH the past one year:

i. ________________________________ ii. _______________________________ ii. __________________________________

b. Serious (acute) and chronic ailments of members of the AH the past year:

i. ________________________________ ii. _______________________________

c. For serious and chronic ailments that afflicted members of the AH the past year, did you go to a doctor, medical clinic, or hospital?

i. Yes

ii. No Why not? ___________________________________________

d. Where is the nearest medical clinic or hospital located from where you live? i. Same village/ward of the AH

ii. In another village/ward

iii. In the district/town center

8. Sanitation concerns:

a. Source(s) of water for drinking: i. Ground well belonging to the AH ii. Pump well belonging to the AH iii. Piped water from public

provider

iv. Public/neighbor’s open well v. Public/neighbor’s pump vi. River/canal

vii. Buy from retailers viii. Other (specify) ________________

b. Source(s) of water for washing: i. Ground well belonging to the AH ii. Pump well belonging to the AH iii. Piped water from public

provider

iv. Public/neighbor’s open well v. Public/neighbor’s pump vi. River/canal

vii. Buy from retailers viii. Other (specify) ________________

c. Toilet facility used by the AH: i. Simple water sealed (use pail for flushing) ii. Water sealed with flushing mechanism iii. Open pit

iv. Closed pit v. None

d. Bathing facility used by the AH: i. Enclosed bathroom in the house ii. Open bathing area beside the house iii. River/canal

e. Garbage disposal practice: i. Burry by the AH ii. Collected by local government iii. Throw indiscriminately anywhere

9. Main fuel/power used for lighting: i. Electricity from PLN ii. Kerosene iii. Rechargeable battery iv. Own generator

v. Other ___________

10.. Main fuel/power used for cooking: i. Electricity ii. Charcoal iii. LPG iv. Wood v. Other ___________

11. Ownership of home appliances: i. Television ii. Refrigerator iii. Radio/cassette recorder iv. Telephone/cellphone v. DVD/CD

player

vi. Oven/stove vii. Electric fan viii. Computer ix. Air conditioner

v. Others (specify)_____________________________________

12. Ownership of transportation i. Car ii. Pick-up iii. Truck iv. Motorcycle v. Bicycle vi. Other (specify) _____________ vii. None

13. Social Assistance Program have been received (Gov): : (i). Program Keluarga Harapan/Conditional Cash Transfers (ii). BPJS....(iii). Bedah

Rumah (Housing Stimulus Assistance) (iv). Rastra (v). BLTS (Conditional Cash Transfer), (vi) Other (specify) _____________ (vii). No

assistance

14. CSR from PT Geodipa : (i) No assistance (ii) Yes (Specify) _____________

4

III. Compensation Option

What kind of compensation expected : (a). Land (b). Other arable land to be leased (for sharecroppers)

(c). Cash compensation, (d). Business capital, (e). Training (sepcify) __________________________

(f). Other (specify) __________________________

IV. Public Participation and perception about the Project:

1. Are you aware of the proposed extenstion of geothermal facilities in your village?

a. Yes Where or how did you learn about the proposed project? __________________________

_______________________________________________________________________

b. No

2. What are your positive and/or negative views, if any, about extention of geothermal facilities in your village?

a. Positive:

___________________________________________________________________________________________________

b. Negative:

__________________________________________________________________________________________________

3. What are your suggestions, if any, on how to ensure that local residents will derive benefit from the Project, during the construction of the

extention of geothermal facilities and when the said facilities is already operational?

a.

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________

b.

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________

V. LIVELIHOOD SOURCES AND PROGAM

1. What are your main source of income :

a. Farming d. Run a small business (specify.............)r

b. Livestock farmer e. other, specify

c. Middleman

2. Does your income will be impacted by project?

a. Yes b. No, because.

3. If yes, in what way could the project help ?

a. Replacement of land to be leased

b. Training

c. No need help

d. Other, specify..............

4. What kind of training do you need?

a. Training to improve farming skills (agriculture cultivation improvement)

b. Training on livestock management skills

c. Training on processing of agriculture product

d. Training on processing of livestock product

e. Training on entrepreunership management

f. Other, specify

VI. Grievance redress:

1. If you have any complaint or concern regarding any aspect related to the proposed construction of geothermal faciloties that is partly located

in your village/ward, such as accuracy of the inventory of your affected assets; amount or level of compensation for your affected assets;

construction activities of the civil works contractor; etc.

a. To whom do you think your complaint or concern should be brought to? ______________________________________________

5

b. In what way should you bring forward your complaint or concern? b.1 Verbal b.2 Written

2. In the event that you are not satisfied with the action taken by the person or office where you first brought your complaint or concern, to

whom do you want to bring your complaint or concern next for appropriate action? _____________________________________

6

7

GUIDELINE INTERVIEW

A. Stakeholder

a) Profile

1. Nama

2. Usia

3. Tanggal Lahir

4. Lama Tinggal

5. Alamat

6. Pendidikan

b) Kegiatan Usaha

1. Jenis usaha

2. Proses / tahapan memulai usaha

alasan pemilihan jenis usaha,

Sumber dan besaran modal

Jaringan (pasar, kemitraan, dll)

capacity building

3. Pendapatan dan pengelolaan usaha perputaran hasil usaha.

c) Usulan

1. Peluang dan potensi usaha di kawasan dieng

2. Peluang permodalan

3. Peluang jajaring dan kemitraan

----

B. FGD Penyewa dan penggarap lahan

C. FGD Istri Penyewa dan Penggarap Lahan

D. FGD Remaja dan kaum muda

Appendix 13: Focus Group Discussions Guidelines

General

What is a focus group discussion (FGD) ?

FGDs consist of a meeting of approximately 6 - 12 people who discuss questions asked by a facilitator.

Group members talk freely and spontaneously about certain guided topics. The purpose of a FGD is to

obtain in-depth information on perceptions and ideas from a group.

When should a FGD be used ?

FGDs can be useful to:

- gather perspectives of particular groups (e.g. women or men, young or old, wealthy or poor,

different ethnic groups).

- explore controversial topics and issues which are important to community members, which they

may feel more comfortable discussing in a group situation.

Limits to be aware of:

There a e less ti e to e plo e people’s pe spe ti es i depth. Loude oi es a do i ate uiete ones. Facilitators should try to hear from everyone, and should also ask participants who are quiet what

they think. Note that FGDs are not always appropriate for sensitive topics.

Suggestions for selecting different FGD groups:

- FGD consisting of men

- FGD consisting of women

- FGD consisting of young people (gender separated or mixed)(between ages of approximately 15-

24. Note that under 18 years old is considered girl/boy.)

- FGD consisting of ethnic minorities / customary groups (komunitas adat)

FGDs should be conducted by at least two team members, with one person asking questions and one

person taking notes. This is so that the person conducting the FGD can have full concentration on the

discussions taking place during the FGD. The person taking notes should use a notepad and write down

the questions asked, followed by the responses from all participants. The note taker must make sure that

they record who provided the quote. If possible, audio tape the discussion so that it is easier to reflect

and go back to what has been said at a later date if necessary. If possible, take photos of any visual

materials used or created. The facilitator should note down any key observations that they have when

conducting the FGDs.

Objectives of this FGD is to discuss socio-economic characteristics and Project impacts on livelihoods

and livelihood options.

Facilitators should start by explaining who they are and what organisation they come from, followed by

the purpose of the meeting and the research. Advise the respondents that they will not be named when

writing the report (it is best if you do not even ask for the respondents names to ensure anonymity).

Introduction

My name is :

I work for :

An organisation based in:

We are conducting study ...... The Purpose of this study is.....

The note taker must record the following informatin at the start of each FGD:

- Date of FGD (dd/mm/yy)

- Time of FGD

- I te ie e ’s + ote take ’s names

- District

- Village

- Number of women (18 years of age or older, < 60 years) present at the FGD

- Number of men (18 years of age or older, < 60 years) at the FGD

- Number of girls (younger than 18 years old) present at the FGD

- Number of boys (younger than 18 years old) present at the FGD

- Number of people with disabilities present at the FGD

- Number of old people (60 years of age)

Income Restoration specific FGD Guide

Socio-Economy :

1. Do you know about the project? What do you think about it ?

2. How many persons in each household ? How many workers in each household ? What is the main

income ? (farming, trading, livestock, etc). How much average income ? How much monthly

expenditure ? What is the greatest categories ? (food, transportation, etc)

3. Averages size of landholdings ? Status of ownership (what type of land ownership papers ?)

4. For the land in the affected area. What is the propose of the land ? Who owns the land ? How

much area owned by each household (on average) ?

5. If it is for farming, who is involved in the farming activities ? (sawah, kebun, etc)

6. For trading, what is commonly traded ? how is it sold ?

7. For livestock, what kind of livestock ? how is it sold ? how much income from this ?

Gender Perpective (triangulation with information collected from gender FGS) :

8. What is the general attitude towards women in the community and is this changing?

9. Do women and marginalised people have equal access to resources and decision-making?

10. What are the key social concerns highlighted by respondents? How is this different for women

and men?

11. Ho does the la k of so ial esou es i ease people’s ul e a ilities (e.g. ho does it p e e t them from protecting their lives and their livelihoods ?) How is this different for women and men?

12. Do women or men suffer from violence in this community?

Income Restoration Programme :

1. If you lose the affected land, will it have an impact to your income ? how big an impact ? ( < / >

10 % ?)

2. If yes, in what way could the project help ? Replacement land ?

3. For your livelihood, what do you think can be done by you and your family as income ?

4. Do you need specific knowledge or skills for that ? What kind of knowledge / skills / training do

you need ? how often?

5. Do you have a small business (UKM) ? What about financial management ?

6. What about capital ? Do you have access to capital ? In what way could the Project assist ?

7. Consultation re: Livelihood Restoration Menu of Options (to be finalized and provided by CSR

Division / EDF Consultant (DG)

1

Profile of Karang Tengah Village & Socio Economic Results

A. Profile of Karang Tengah Village

1. Figure A presents the village map of Karang Tengah.

Figure A: Map of Karang Tengah Village

2. The Village of Karang Tengah is located in the Kecamatan (sub-district) of Batur, in the

Kabupaten (Regency of District) of Banjarnegara in Central Java Province. The village is

located about 10 km from the capital of Kecamatan capital of Batur, and 52 km from the

Kabupaten capital of Banjarnegara. Geographically, Village of Karang Tengah is located at the

Dieng Plateau between Mount Pager Kandang and Mount Merdada. Village of Karang Tengah

is between 4 villages (Praten to the north, Kepakisan to the west, Dieng Kulon to the east, and

Bakal to the south). Access to Village of Karang Tengah is relativley easy (connected by roads

and good local transportation). The climate is tropical with two seasons - dry and rainy. The

temperature of Village of Karang Tengah is relatively cold, especially from late afternoon

onwards. At nights, temperature often fall below 10 degrees C.

3. Table 1 provides a profile of Karang Tengah Village.

2

Table 1: Profile of Karang Tengah Village

VILLAGE STATISTICS

Size of Village territory (wilayah desa) 488,811 Ha

Elevation above sea level 2,081 m

Average daily temperature 15

◦ C

Land Use:

Dry land agriculture 250,831 Ha (51.3 %)

Settlements 190,402 Ha (39 %)

Home Gardens 2,331 Ha (0.5 %)

Water bodies 20 Ha

Village land (for cash) 28,138 Ha (5.8 %)

Public Facilities 6 Ha

Forest 9 Ha

Total (488,811 Ha)

Number of Village Govt. personnel 11

Number of hamlets (dusun) 3

Number of tourist attractions (obyek wisata) 1

Number of homestays 5

Total population 4,992 people

Breakdown by gender 2,513 male,

2,479 female

Total number of households 1.400 HH

Number of people within productive age bracket (19 – 55 years of age)

56 %

Dependency ratio 1 48.8%

Proportion of education who have completed schooling / education

65.9 %

proportion who have completed primary education only

(SD) 52 %

proportion who have completed lower secondary school

(SLTP) 7.8 %

proportion who have completed upper secondary school

(SLTA) 5 %

Diploma IV (Strata I) (35 people) 0.7 %

Diploma I / II (11 people) 0.22 %

Academy / Diploma III / Graduate (Sarjana Muda) (37 people) 0.74 %

1 (Population within 0-12 years age brackets + population 55 years and above) / (Population within 13 – 55 years of age brackets) x 100% (based on available data)

3

VILLAGE STATISTICS

Did not complete basic education (primary school) 22 %

No formal education / not yet of school going age 11.4 %

Main sectors of Economy / Income

Agriculture (food / seasonal crops) Rp. 10,000,000,000 (99.55% )

Agriculture (estate crops) Rp. 5,000,000

(0.05 %)

Trade Rp. 31,200,000

(0.31%)

Services Rp. 6,000,000

(0.06 %)

Home-stay Rp. 3,000,000

(0.03 %)

Number of Ojek (motorcycle taxis) in village 17

Welfare

Well off (Sejahtera 3+) n/a

Poor (Pra-sejahtera) 305 HH

Poor (Pra-sejahtera 1) 150 HH

Very Poor (Pra-sejahtera 2) 153 HH

Very Poor (Pra-sejahtera 3) n/a

Types of social organisations present – women’s groups, youth, professional. men’s group, LP3M, Self-help groups, Traditional groups

Women’s Organization’s (PKK) Programs – active

Demographic Aspects

4. The village population per 2018 was 4,992 (2,513 male, and 2,479 female) consisting

of 1,400 households. The number of people in the working age group (19-55 years) is relatively

high compared to other age groups. It is common for parents to involve boys from age 17 in

agricultural work.

5. The level of education of Karang Tengah’s population is considered low. More than

50% of the population has attended only up to primary or elementary school level. Some 11%

have no formal education, and 22% of the population did not complete their basic education

(primary school).

6. There are two primary schools (SD) and two kindergartens in Karang Tengah Village.

People who have graduated from primary school have to pursue secondary level and higher

education out of the village or the sub-district.

4

Agriculture, Environment, Economic, Social and Religious Aspects

7. Dieng society tends to be more progressive towards transformation compared to other

“zomia” areas in South-East Asia 2. Dieng has a history of in-migration and of progressing from

subsistence agriculture (corn) to a market economy (tobacco, cabbage and temperate

vegetables) over the last century. A potato boom occurred over the 1980-1990s. For the last

30 years, potato has become a very promising commodity for farmers - with high economic

value, and short cultivation cycle term (3 harvests/year).3 Since the 1980s, potato farming has

grown more extensive and intensive in Dieng. Farmers no longer observe a fallow period

common in highland agriculture. Declining productivity has caused potato farming to become

more expensive – cost of chemical fertilizers now account for 60% of production costs. The

heavily cultivated slopes in Dieng are prone to landslides as potato bunds are constructed in

the same direction as the slope (for drainage), and potato cannot thrive under shade, so there

are few trees planted to bind terrace countours. Due to erosion of top soil, manure is no longer

fertilizer but also planting medium. Price fluctuations and more frequent failed harvests have

made potato farming more risky and speculative. Farmers have become entrapped in a potato-

debt cycle over time they can only borrow if loan proceeds are applied to potato farming. The

above situation has contributed to the growth and sustains the formal banking and agro-

chemical industries in Dieng.4 According to Santoso, this has generated a dynamic of

accumulation in the hands of a few more resilient land owners-farmers, and dispossession and

out-migration of weaker and less competitive farmers.

8. The majority of Karang Tengah residents are potato farmers – a profession inhearited

from their predecessors. Other sources of income includes services (including home stays)

and the trade sector. Dieng Plateau including the Village of Karang Tengah is the biggest

potato producing area in Indonesia. Potato farming in Karang Tengah Village is supported by

the existence of Telaga Merdada (Merdada Lake) as the main source of water for potato

agriculture. Village data (2018) shows that some IDR 10 billion of village income derived from

the agricultural sector (Table 4-1).

9. The community of Karang Tengah Village is described as a religious one. The majority

of residents are Muslim. In one relatively small village, there are 19 places of worship - 3

mosques and 16 musholla (small neighbourhood places of worship). Religious activities are

regularly organized – neighbourhood Koran recitations on Thursday nights, praying for the

souls of the departed, celebration of main religious days of Islam and cultural rites such as

Sabtu Wage. Santoso notes that religious expression and rituals have become a source to

ameliorate tense relations within the community arising from competition and land disputes.

Sallehudin and Zakaria (2019) describe the phenomenon as the theologisation of agriculture.

2 Scott, J.C. 2009, https://understandingsociety.blogspot.com/2010/03/zomia-james-scott-on-highland-peoples.html 3 “Dieng. Perubahan Ekologi, Proses Produksi, dan Identitas”, presentation material prepared by Dr. Hery Santoso for the SES Team, 13 August 2019. 4 Santoso, H. 2019. “Kejayaan Dan Ketersingkiran - Proses Diferensiasi Di Kalangan Petani Kentang Di Dataran Tinggi Dieng”, and “Sebuah Dunia Baru - Pembentukan Relasi Kapitalis Dalam Proses Produksi Kentang Di Dieng”

5

B. Socio-economic Census Methodology

9. Total number of affected households covered by the SES was 29 5. As such, a socio-

economic census rather than survey (SES)6 was conducted. The SEC included the following

data collection instruments:

i) SEC questionnaire;

ii) In-depth interviews with key informants (successful local business people in fields other

than potato-based agriculture);

iii) Focus Group Discussions (FGD) with all AHs, a sample of women (wives) from AHs,

and young working age people from AHs.

All data collection instruments prepared for the SES are provided in Appendix 10 of the RP.

10. As in the case of the IOL, the socio economic census was carried in two stages. Stage

1 was conducted with 24 tenant farmers of the proposed Dieng-2 power plant site (Mess GDE)

over 23 – 24 April 2019. The second SEC was carried out over the period 14 – 28 August

2019.

11. The first stage SES was conducted by two social safeguards consultants. The IOL

portion of the exercise was based on an aerial photograph of the GDE-owned Dieng-2 power

plant site and field check, followed by SEC interviews with the 24 tenant farmers conducted at

the house of Bpk. Nasrullah (the head of the 4 coordinators).

12. An SES contractor was mobilized to conduct the second stage of the SES. They mobilized

to Dieng on 14 August and completed their work by 23 August 2019. The SES team verified

the list with the respective Hamlet (Kepala Dusun) and Village Heads (Kepala Desa), and

conducted socio-economic interviews with all affected heads of households.

13. The SEC household interview was gender sensitive. 50% of all heads of household

were interviewed. 50 % of all wives were also interviewed for their perspectives. In-depth

interviews were also gender sensitive. Of the 7 people identified to be interviewed, two were

women entrepreneurs. In the case of the FGDs, there were four sessions (all conducted at the

GDE Dieng Unit office) :

i) The first FGD was held at 7 pm on 21 August 2019. It was originally targeted at young

working age people of the affected households. However, the Village Youth Group

(Karang Taruna) and various other member of the local community came.

ii) The second FGD was held at 3 pm on 22 August 2019. This was with wives and women

from all affected households. Wives/womenfolk from 21 affected household

participated.

iii) The third FGD was held at 4 pm on 23 August 2019. This was with 24 tenant farmers

(and 4 coordinators) who were leasing GDE-land (mess GDE). All attended.

5 The SES covered 28 AHs. One AH (cropper) was on pilgrimage (performing the Hajj) and could not be interviewed. After the SES was completed, four (4) lease coordinators (who were not covered by the SES) were subsequently deemed to be indirectly affected and should be addressed so as to reduce economic and political risk. As such, they have been accounted for in Table 2-5 (Summary of impacts) as well as Table 8-1 (Entitltment matrix). 6 The more familiar acronym SES will continue to be used even though the survey was a census.

6

iv) The fourth FGD was held at 7 pm on 23 August 2019. This was supposed to be with 6

land owners, but only 4 attended.

All attendance sheets are provided in Appendix 14 of the RP.

C. Socio-economic Census (SEC) Findings

14. The following section only presents all the tables and some graphs that were generated

by the SES team for the purpose of the RP.

Table 2: Educational Attainment of 28 Respondents

Percentage (%) of males

Number of males

Last Educational Level Total % Number of females

Percentage (%) of females

7.1 2 Never Attended School 4 14.2 2 7.1

17.9 5 Primary or Elementary School / Islamic Primary School /

Equivalent (SD)

15 53.6 10 35.7

3.6 1 Lower Secondary School / Islamic Lower Secondary School

/ Equivalen (SLTP)

2 7.2 1 3.6

21.4 6 Upper Secondary School ) Islamic Upper Secondary School

/ Equivalent (SLTA)

7 25 1 2.6

50 14 TOTAL 28 100 14 50

Table 3: Educational Attainment of AH members

Percentage (%) of males

Number of males

Last Educational Level Total % Number of females

Percentage (%) of females

6.3 6 Never Attended School 12 12.7 6 6.3

33.8 33 Primary or Elementary School / Islamic Primary School /

Equivalent (SD)

50 52.7 17 17.9

7.3 7 Lower Secondary School / Islamic Lower Secondary School

/ Equivalen (SLTP)

13 13.8 6 6.4

3.3 3 Upper Secondary School ) Islamic Upper Secondary School

/ Equivalent (SLTA)

13 13.8 10 10.6

2.1 2 Vocational School 2 2.1 0 0

1.1 1 Non-degree 2 2.2 1 1.1

1.1 1 University 3 3.2 2 2.1

55.8 53 TOTAL 95 100 42 44.2

Note * Information was not collected (answers not provided) in the case of 11 AH members.

Table 4: Land Ownership (based on IOL census)

7

Size of land owned

Own < 0.1 Own 0.1 –

0.25 ha Own 0.26 – 0.5 ha

0.51 – 0.75 ha

> 0.75 ha landless Total

n % n % n % n % n % n % n %

Responses from 28 Heads of AHs.

Male-headed 3 10.7 9 32.1 3 10.7 1 3.6 1 3.6 11 39.3 28 100

Female-headed

Figure B: Size of land owned by landed AHs

Table 5: Status of Land Tenure (based on IOL census)

Gender of AH Head

Land owner with land certificate

Land owner with Akte

Land owner withSPPT

Land owner Landless

n % n % n % n % n %

Responses from 28 heads of affected households

Male-headed 4 26.7 1 6.7 10 66.6 15 53.6 13 46.4

Female-headed

10,7%

32,1%

10,7%

3,6%3,6%

39,3%

Land Ownership (based on IOL census)

Own < 0.1 ha

Own 0.1 – 0.25 ha

Own 0.26 – 0.5 ha

0.51 – 0.75 ha

0.75 – 1 ha

landless

8

Figure C: Status of Land Tenure (based on IOL census)

Table 6A: Primary occupation of affected household members

Gender of AH Head

No, Attending

School Farmer Trader

Farm workers

Retired Other Total

n % n % n % n % n % n % n %

Responses from 14 womens/wives of affected housheolds (AHs)

Male 7 7.8 17 18.9 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 1.1 1 1.1 26 28.9

Female 3 3.3 11 12.2 1 1.1 1 1.1 1 1.1 4 4.4 21 23.3

Responses of 14 male heads of AHs

Male 5 5.6 19 21.1 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 1.1 0 0.0 25 27.8

Female 3 3.3 11 12.2 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 1.1 3 3.3 18 20.0

Total 18 20 58 64.4 1 1.1 1 1.1 4 4.4 8 8.8 90 100

Note: * Occupations of 15 household members were not documented.

Table 6B: Primary occupation of affected household members (same data, condensed)

Gender of AH

member

No, Attending

School Farmer Trader

Farm workers

Retired Other Total

n % n % n % n % n % n % n %

Male 12 13.5 36 40.4 0 0.0 0 0.0 2 2.2 1 1.1 51 57.3

Female 6 6.7 21 23.6 1 1.1 1 1.1 2 2.2 7 7.9 38 42.7

Total 18 20.2 58 64.0 1 1.1 1 1.1 4 4.5 8 9.0 89 100.0

10,7%

3,6%

35,7%

60,7%

39,3%

Land owner with

land certificate

Land owner with

Akte

Land owner

withSPPT

Land owner Landless

Pe

rce

nta

ge

(%

)

Status of Land Tenure

9

Table 7: Number of gainfully employed AH members

Gender of Respondent

Number of gainfully employed members of the AH Male** Female**

< 2 2 3 4 Total

n % n % n % n % n % n % n %

Responses from 14 womens/wives of affected housheolds (AHs)

Male-headed 2 7.1 9 32.1 1 3.6 2 7.1 14 50 18 26.9 17 25.4

Responses of 14 male heads of AHs

Male-headed 3 10.7 7 25.0 3 10.7 1 3.6 14 50 19 28.3 13 19.4

Total (n) 5 17.8 16 37.1 4 14.3 3 10.7 28 100 37 55.2 30 44.8

Note: There were no female-headed households.

Table 8: Dependency Ratio

Name

Number of HH

members

No. of HH members

not working

No. of working

HH members Dependency Ratio

Khotiyah 4 0 4 0.0

Sopinah 4 0 4 0.0

Tusiah 4 2 2 1.0

Siti Hayinah 6 4 2 2.0

Parinem 2 0 2 0.0

Yunianto 4 0 4 0.0

Haryati 4 3 1 3.0

Turmudi 3 1 2 0.5

Khuryadi 5 3 2 1.5

Arifin 4 2 2 1.0

Surati 4 0 4 0.0

Fatminah 2 1 1 1.0

Mahtum 4 2 2 1.0

Juhari 5 2 3 0.7

Hariadi 3 0 3 0.0

Ngadi Sukur 2 1 1 1.0

Soib 4 2 2 1.0

Mistini 4 2 2 1.0

Amin 2 0 2 0.0

Boniah 4 1 3 0.3

Ibnu Hadi 4 2 2 1.0

Maryatul 3 1 2 0.5

Marzuki 3 0 3 0.0

Tuyono 4 0 4 0.0

Siti Alwiyah 5 1 4 0.3

Mistilah 6 4 2 2.0

Budiyono 2 1 1 1.0

Tumiyati 4 2 2 1.0

10

Table 9: Monthly Income

Gender of AH Head

<400,000 400,000~

poverty line

Above poverty

line~2,000,000

2,000,001~ 4000000

4,000,001~ 5000000

5,000,001~ 7000000

7000,001~ above

Total

Responses from 14 womens/wives of affected housheolds (AHs)

Male-headed 0 0 0 0 1 5 1 5 1 5 1 5 2 10 6 30

Female-headed

Responses of 14 male heads of Ahs

Male-headed 1 5 2 10 4 20 1 5 1 5 0 0 5 25 14 70

Female-headed

Total 1 5 2 10 5 25 2 10 2 10 1 5 7 35 20 100

Note: * NA in the case of 8 wives.

Table 10: Combined monthly households Savings

Gender of AH Head

<400,000 400,000~poverty

line (Rp. 278,210,-)

Above poverty line - 2,000,000

2,000,001~4000000 Total

n % n % n % n % n %

Responses from 14 womens/wives of affected housheolds (AHs)

Male-headed 0 0 0 0 0

Female-headed

Responses of 14 male heads of AHs

Male-headed 1 25 0 0 2 50 1 25 4 100

Female-headed

Total 1 25 0 0 2 50 1 25 4 100

Table 11: Number of cars owned

Gender of AH Head

0 1 2 3 Total

n % n % n % n % n %

Responses from 14 womens/wives of affected housheolds (AHs)

Male-headed 10 35.7 2 7.1 0 0.0 2 7.1 14 50.0

Female-headed 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Responses of 14 male heads of AHs

Male-headed 12 42.9 2 7.1 0 0.0 0 0.0 14 50.0

Female-headed 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total (n) 22 78.6 4 14.2 0 0 2 7.1 28 100.0

Table 12: Number of motorcycles owned

Gender of AH Head

0 1 2 Total

n % n % n % n %

Responses from 14 womens/wives of affected housheolds (AHs)

Male-headed 1 3.6 7 25.0 6 21.4 14 50.0

11

Female-headed 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Responses of 14 male heads of AHs

Male-headed 8 28.6 6 21.4 0 0.0 14 50.0

Female-headed 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total (n) 9 32.2 13 46.4 6 21.4 28 100

Table 13: Number of bicycles owned

Gender of AH Head

0 1 Total

n % n % n %

Responses from 14 womens/wives of affected housheolds (AHs)

Male-headed 14 50.0 0 0.0 14 50.0

Female-headed 0 0 0 0 0 0

Responses of 14 male heads of AHs

Male-headed 11 39.3 3 10.7 14 50.0

Female-headed 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total (n) 25 89.3 3 10.7 28 100.0

Figure D: Types and Number of Vehicles owned by AHs (combined data)

21,4%

3,6%

42,9%

10,7%

0,0%

10,7%

3,6%

3,6% 3,6%

Ownership of vehicles

own no vehicles own 1 or more bicycle(s)

own 1 motorcyle + 0 or >0 bicycles own 2 motorcycles + 0 or >0 bicycles

own 1 car only own 1 car + motorcycle(s)

own 2 cars + motorcycles / bicycles own 3 cars

own 4 cars

12

Tables 14 and 15: Summary of common and serious ailments suffered by AH members

Common Ailments No. of people % Serious Ilnesses No. of people %

Cough and cold 7 62.9 Stroke 1 20

Headache 4 14.8 Limp 1 20

Indigestion 3 11 Bone abnormality 1 20

Colds / Flu 2 7.4 Asthma 1 20

Sprain 1 3.7 Heart disease 1 20

27 100 5 100

Figure E: Common Ailments of APs

Figure F: Serious Illnesses of APs.

63%15%

11%

7%

4%

Common Ailments

Cough & cold Headache Indigestion Colds Sprain

20%

20%

20%

20%

20%

Serious Illnesses

Stroke Limp Prominent bone abnormalities Asthma Heart disease

13

Table 16: Location (proximity) of medical services in relation to AHs

Gender of AH Head

Location of Medical Facilities from the Point of View of the Ahs

Total Same village of the AH

In another village in the same sub-district

In the district/town center

n % n % n % n %

Responses from 14 womens/wives of affected housheolds (AHs)

Male-headed 11 39.3 2 7.1 1 3.6 14 50.0

Female-headed 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Responses of 14 male heads of AHs

Male-headed 11 39.3 2 7.1 1 3.6 14 50.0

Female-headed 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total 22 78.6 4 14.2 2 7.2 28 100

Figure G: Location of medical services in relation to AHs

Table 17: Source of water supply for household needs

Gender of AH Head

Ground well belonging to

the AH

Other (Gunung

Prau)

Other (Telaga

Merdada)

Other (Telaga Siterus)

Other (Telaga

Pawuhan) Total

n % n % n % n % n % n %

Responses from 14 womens/wives of affected housheolds (AHs)

Male-headed 1 3.6 4 14.3 0 0.0 7 25.0 2 7.1 14 50.0

Female-headed

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Responses of 14 male heads of Ahs

Male-headed 1 3.6 4 14.3 3 10.7 3 10.7 3 10.7 14 50.0

Female-headed

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

79%

14%

7%

Location of medical services in relation to AHs

Same village of the AH

In another village in the

same sub-district

In the district/town center

14

Gender of AH Head

Ground well belonging to

the AH

Other (Gunung

Prau)

Other (Telaga

Merdada)

Other (Telaga Siterus)

Other (Telaga

Pawuhan) Total

n % n % n % n % n % n %

Total 2 7.2 8 28.6 3 10.7 10 35.7 5 17.8 28 100

Table: 18: Garbage Diposal

Gender of AH Head

Buried by the AH

Collected by local

government

Dump just anywhere

Dump in river Burned by AH Total

n % n % n % n % n % n %

Responses from 14 womens/wives of affected housheolds (AHs)

Male-headed 4 14.3 1 3.6 2 7.1 2 7.1 5 17.9 14 50.0

Female-headed 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Responses of 14 male heads of Ahs

Male-headed 0 0 1 3.6 2 7.1 7 25.0 4 14.3 14 50.0

Female-headed 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total 4 14.3 2 7.1 4 14.3 9 32.1 9 32.2 28 100.0

Table 19: Location of medical services in relation to AHs

Gender of AH Head

Location of Medical Facilities from the Point of View of the Ahs

Total Same village of the AH

In another village in the same sub-district

In the district/town center

n % n % n % n %

Responses from 14 womens/wives of affected housheolds (AHs)

Male-headed 11 39.3 2 7.1 1 3.6 14 50.0

Female-headed 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Responses of 14 male heads of AHs

Male-headed 11 39.3 2 7.1 1 3.6 14 50.0

Female-headed 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total 22 78.6 4 14.2 2 7.2 28 100

Table 20: Main source of potable water for AHs

Gender of AH Head

Ground well belonging to

the AH

Other (Gunung

Prau)

Other (Telaga

Merdada)

Other (Telaga Siterus)

Other (Telaga

Pawuhan) Total

n % n % n % n % n % n %

Responses from 14 womens/wives of affected housheolds (AHs)

Male-headed 1 3.6 4 14.3 0 0.0 7 25.0 2 7.1 14 50.0

Female-headed

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Responses of 14 male heads of Ahs

Male-headed 1 3.6 4 14.3 3 10.7 3 10.7 3 10.7 14 50.0

15

Female-headed

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total 2 7.2 8 28.6 3 10.7 10 35.7 5 17.8 28 100

Table 21: Main Source of Water for Washing

Gender of AH Head

Ground well belonging to

the AH

Other (Gunung

Prau)

Other (Telaga

Merdada)

Other (Telaga Siterus)

Other (Telaga

Pawuhan) Total

n % n % n % n % n % n %

Responses from 14 womens/wives of affected housheolds (AHs)

Male-headed 1 3.6 4 14.3 3 10.7 4 14.3 2 7.1 14 50.0

Female-headed

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Responses of 14 male heads of Ahs

Male-headed 1 3.6 0 0.0 10 35.7 1 3.6 2 7.1 14 50.0

Female-headed

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total 2 7.2 4 14.3 13 46.4 5 17.9 4 14.2 28 100

Table 22: Toilet facilities

Gender of AH Head

Simple water sealed (use pail for flushing)

n %

Responses from 14 womens/wives of affected housheolds (AHs)

Male-headed 14 50

Female-headed

0 0

Responses of 14 male heads of Ahs

Male-headed 14 50

Female-headed

0 0

Total 28 100

15. Toilet Facilities. All homes have

toilet facilities. All use simple water

sealed toilets and use a pail for manual

flushing.

16. Bathing Facilities. Most of AH

homes of enclosed bathrooms in the

house. Only 2 AHs have a bathing area

outside the house.

Table 23: Bathing Facilities

Gender of AH Head

Simple water sealed (use pail for flushing)

Open bathing area beside the house

Total

n % n % n %

Responses from 14 womens/wives of affected housheolds (AHs)

Male-headed 14 50 0 0 14 50

Female-headed 0 0 0 0 0 0

Responses of 14 male heads of Ahs

Male-headed 13 46 1 4 14 50

Female-headed 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total (n) 27 96 1 4 28 100

16

Table: 24: Garbage Diposal

Gender of AH Head

Burry by the AH

Collected by local

government

Dump just anywhere

Dump in river Burned by AH Total

n % n % n % n % n % n %

Responses from 14 womens/wives of affected housheolds (AHs)

Male-headed 4 14.3 1 3.6 2 7.1 2 7.1 5 17.9 14 50.0

Female-headed 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Responses of 14 male heads of Ahs

Male-headed 0 0 1 3.6 2 7.1 7 25.0 4 14.3 14 50.0

Female-headed 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total 4 14.3 2 7.1 4 14.3 9 32.1 9 32.2 28 100.0

Table 4-25: Power Supply

Gender of AH Head

Electricity from public provider

n %

Responses from 14 women / wives of affected housheolds (AHs)

Male-headed 14 50

Female-headed

Responses of 14 male heads of Ahs

Male-headed 14 50

Female-headed

Total 28 100

17. Power supply. All AHs use

electricity supply provided by GDE.

None of the AHs said they used diesel

generators, rechargeable batteries or

kerosene.

18. Main source of Fuel for Cooking. A majority of AHs use gas for cooking. Only 5 AHs

still use firewood.

Table 26: Source of fuel for cooking

Gender of AH LPG Wood Total

n % n % n %

Responses from 14 women / wives of affected housheolds (AHs)

Male-headed 15 50 0 0 14 50

Female-headed

Responses of 14 male heads of Ahs

Male-headed 10 35.7 4 14.3 14 50

Female-headed

Total (n) 24 85.7 4 14.3 28 100

17

AHs’ Perception of the Proposed Sub-project

Table 27: AHs’ Views regarding the proposed Dieng-2 expansion sub-project

Respondent Beneficial

Negative Impact

No Opinion Total

n % n % n % n %

14 heads of AHs 6 21.4 4 14.3 4 14.3 14 50

14 wives in AHs 0 0 8 28.6 6 21.4 14 50

28 respondents 6 21.4 12 42.9 10 35.7 28 100

Table 28: Other views concerning the sub-project

14 male Heads of AHs. f % 14 wives of AHs. f %

No comment 6 21.4 No comment 5 17.9

Electricity 3 10.7 Will cause loss of

livelihood

3 10.7

No assistance 2 7.2 Will reduce HH income 2 7.2

Many roofs damaged 1 3.6 Noisy, not safe, crops

damaged.

2 7.2

Noisy, brine wastes 1 3.6 Afraid that there will be

leakages which will

damage crops.

1 3.6

Up to the community 1 3.6 As long as not noisy,

it’s alright 1 3.6

14 50 14 50

Table 29: Suggestions to ensure that benefits accrue to local communities

14 male Heads of AHs. f % 14 wives of AHs. f %

No comment 12 42.8 No comment 5 17.9

There is alternative land

made available

1 3.6 Provided with / move to

replacement land.

4 14.3

Attention is given to

tenant farmers

1 3.6 Provided with

alternative work

1 3.6

Total 14 50 Security is upheld 1 3.6

Project is handled well 1 3.6

Provide sosialisation to

the community

1 3.6

Up to Geodipa 1 3.6 Total 14 50

18

Table 30: Support for the Project

Respondent Support Do not support No Comment Total

n % n % n % n %

14 male heads of AHs

6 21.4 4 14.3 4 14.3 14 50

14 wives of AHs 1 3.6 13 46.4 0 0 14 50

28 respondents 7 25 17 60.7 4 14.3 28 100

Table 31: Reasons given for support / rejection of the Project

14 male Heads of AHs. f % 14 wives of AHs. f %

No comment 9 32.1 Will reduce husband’s land / income / farming*

9 32.1

Up to the community 2 7.1 No comment 3 10.7

Loss of land 1 3.6 Noise, steam causes

damage to potato

crops.*

2 7.1

Should be provided

compensation for lost

land

1 3.6 Lose income as a farm

worker

1 3.6

Village become more

developed.

1 3.6 14 50

Total 14 50

Note * one response re: steam overlapped / also included impact on income.

Table 32: Best ways to mitigate negative impacts for local community

14 male Heads of AHs. f % 14 wives of AHs. f %

Ensure a distance between the

Project and residential area

(settlement) / build somewhere

elso

4 14.3 No comment 6 21.4

Compensation for affected

people / compensation for

damages

4 14.3 Alternative land for

farmers.

4 14.3

No comment 4 14.3 Project should be out

of town, not at mess

GDE.

2

Improvement to Geodipa’s development

1 3.6 Provide socialisation

to the communities

2

Deal with the noise and

disturbance.

1 3.6 14 50

19

14 male Heads of AHs. f % 14 wives of AHs. f %

14 50

Table 33: Best way to communicate Project matters to community

14 male Heads of AHs. f % 14 wives of AHs. f %

Via Village Head and/or

religious leaders.

11 39.3 At Village Meetings 14 50

Via Geodipa officers 3 10.7

14 50

Table 34: Reasons for responses to Table 4-29

14 male Heads of AHs. f % 14 wives of AHs. f %

No comment 8 28.6 No comment 9 32.1

So everyone can hear

directly from the source

3 10.7 Meeting with tenant

farmer group

3 10.7

Inform Village Head first,

who will inform

community later.

2 7.2 Village will take

responsibility

1 3.6

Via coordinators 2 7.2 Among farmers 1 3.6

14 50 14 50

Table 35: Party to report complaints to or to seek clarification through.

14 male Heads of AHs. f % 14 wives of AHs. f %

Lease coordinator 7 25 Village Government 6 17.9

Village head 5 17.9 Coordinator 3 10.7

Direcly to Geodipa 2 7.2 Village Head 2 7.2

14 50 Village Head or

coordinator

1 3.6

Will follow what others

decide

1 3.6

No comment 1 3.6

14 50

20

Table 36: How would you seek for clarification of submit complaints ?

14 male Heads of AHs. F % 14 wives of AHs. f %

Verbally 13 46.4 Verbally 9 32.1

Written 1 3.6 No comment 5 17.9

14 50 14 50

Table 37: If you are still not satisfied, who will you approach for a solution ?

14 male Heads of AHs. f % 14 wives of AHs. f %

Coordinator 9 32.1 No comment 7 25

Village Head 2 7.2 Village Head 5 17.9

Have never complained

before

1 3.6 Coordinator 2 7.2

No comment 2 7.2 14 50

14 50

Appendix 12 : Assessment on Involuntary Resettlement Policy Gaps

Principles GOI Laws: Law 2/2012,

Implementing Regulations & Perpres 62/2018

ADB Policy Project Policy

Screening of the project.

The legal framework lacks a stand-alone screening requirement for involuntary resettlement impacts. There is no explicit stipulation for conducting a screening and assessment of impacts when land acquisition involves land purchase.

Screen the project early on to identify past, present, and future involuntary resettlement

Screen the sub-project to identify involuntary resettlement impacts and risks. Sub project triggers involuntary resettlement and sub-project with category A as per SPS will not be selected

Meaningful consultation

The legal framework provides greater protection of human rights to children, the poor, and the disabled, also against discrimination to women. However, it does not mandate to afford special attention to the needs of vulnerable groups and to ensure their participation in consultations. Some key groups may not be considered as vulnerable (e.g., women, the landless, and those without legal title to land

Pay attention to the needs of vulnerable groups, especially those below the poverty line, the landless, the elderly, women and children, Indigenous Peoples, and those without legal title to land, and ensure their participation in consultations.

Meaningful consultation shall pay attention to the vulnerable groups (the poor, the landless, the elderly, women and children, Indigenous Peoples, and those without legal title to land). Ensure their participation in consultations

Negotiated land acquisition

A government regulation on negotiated settlement provides for a procedure to implement direct purchase for parcels of land of 5ha and less; however eminent domain may still be triggered if negotiations fail. There may be no option for an affected person to opt out from the deal

Develop procedures in a transparent, consistent, and equitable manner if land acquisition is through negotiated settlement

Negotiated land acquisition shall be undertaken in a transparent, free from intimidation, compensation at replacement cost. Independent party shall be mobilized to ensure that the negotiations are fair and transparent.

Level of compensation and bases of calculation

According to Law 2 of 2012, compensation will be provided based on valuation of independent appraiser that cover (i) land; (ii) over ground and underground spaces; (iii) building; (iv) plants; (v) objects related to land and/or; vi) other appraisable loss such loss of business, jobs, change of profession, and moving costs. Tax incentive is provided to: (a) person who supports the project; (b) person who does not file a complaint related to project location determination and/or compensation. Law is silent on issue of application of depreciation when calculating compensation for affected structures. Valuation standard set by Independent appraisers’ association (MAPPI, 2018) does not apply depreciation for physical

Compensation rate will be calculated at full replacement cost to be determined by an independent appraiser experienced in assessing acquired assets. For involuntary resettlement, no deduction on taxes and administrative costs for affected lands, as well as depreciation in the value of the affected structure will be applied.

Compensation will cover all losses set forth in the Law 2 of 2012. The principle of full replacement cost will be applied. In case of involuntary resettlement, capital gains tax and the costs of transferring ownership, including the cost of new land certificates, will not be deducted from the compensation of those who will lose lands. In case there will be deduction of tax for negotiated land acquisition, the deduction should be clearly consulted and agreed by the affected persons. Compensation at full replacement cost for affected structures will be determined based on the replacement cost of a new building

Depreciation of affected structure value

Principles GOI Laws: Law 2/2012,

Implementing Regulations & Perpres 62/2018

ADB Policy Project Policy

condition of the affected building.1 For affected buildings, MAPPI applies solatium (emotional compensation) of 10% - 30% of the total compensation for physical loss.

without any depreciation.2

Compensation for land users (tenant farmers / croppers / sharecroppers)

Perpres 62/2018 stipulated that compensation should consider the cost of mobilization, cost for moving, house rent during the transition period, and loss of income according to valuation by independent appraisal Law 2/2012 and its elucidation, 71/2012 stipulate that owners of trees/plans are entitled for compensation of affected trees/plants.

Compensation for affected land and non-land assets should be provided at replacement cost

Compensation for sharecroppers be provided based on losses at replacement cost.

Compensation and assistance to displaced persons without legal title or any recognizable legal rights

The legal framework provides compensation and assistance for displaced persons without tittle or any recognizable legal rights to land unless their legitimate claims cannot be proven/recognized prior to land LAR implementation. However, application of full replacement cost for people utilizing land has been owned by the agency needing the land is unclear.

Ensure displaced persons without titles or any recognizable legal rights to land are eligible for resettlement assistance and compensation at replacement cost for loss of non-land assets

The principle to provide compensation for non-land assets at replacement cost will be applied. Assistance in the form of livelihood restoration and relocation assistance will be provided

Assistance to non-land rights holders

Article 36 of Perpres 71 of 2012 indicates the task of appraiser to carry out the appraisal of the amount of compensation which includes: a. Land; b. Space above and below the surface of the land; c. Buildings; d. Plants; e. Objects related to the land; and/or f. Other appraisable loss” means non physical loss equivalent to money value, for example, loss due to loss of business or job, cost of change of location, cost of change of profession, and loss of value of the remaining property.) The law and regulations stipulate on compensation for affected asset, yet do not stipulate on the assistance to the non-land rights holders and other economic loss.

Physically and Economically displaced persons are provided transitional support and development assistance, such as land development, credit facilities, training, or employment opportunities.

Assistance in the form of income restoration will be provided

Transitional support Transitional support and development assistance will be included in the total cost born by displaced persons. Institution needing land can address this through income restoration measures or in the case of GDE, through Community Development Program.

1 Indonesia Valuation Standards 204 (SPI 204). Land Acquisition Assessment for Development for the Public Interest. Code of

Ethics Indonesia Appraisers and Indonesia Standard, 2018, Jakarta

2 Compensation will be based on i) the market value; ii) transaction costs; iii) accrued interest; iv) transition costs and repairs; v)

other applicable payments.

Principles GOI Laws: Law 2/2012,

Implementing Regulations & Perpres 62/2018

ADB Policy Project Policy

There is no legal basis for additional “transitional support/allowance”.

High Risk of Impoverishment

Not covered in new Land Law but Law No. 11/2009 on Social Welfare and its implementing regulation.

Ministry of Social Welfare Decree No. 39/2012 states: To cover or identify vulnerable / severely impacted people by the project as early as possible it can be covered in Social Impact Assessment of AMDAL as referred in Environmental Law no. 32/2009 and other relevant Government Regulation on Environmental Permits.

Particular attention must be given to the needs of poor and vulnerable APs that face the risk of further marginalization and impoverishment.

Income restoration / livelihood rehabilitation measures or program will be provided to severely affected and vulnerable AHs. Severely affected household and other vulnerable groups will be identified at resettlement planning stage. Livelihood restoration assistance will be provided to them through applicable GDE Corporate Social Responsibility programs.

Public disclosure Planning for land acquisition by the Office of the Governor at preparation stage and implementation of land acquisition by BPN will be carried out by holding public meetings and consultations, and results of surveys and appraisal of affected assets will be disclosed to the public.

The draft and agreed social safeguard planning document at TA, and the draft and agreed updated social safeguard planning document at project implementation will be disclosed to the APs and other stakeholders in accessible forms, languages and places. The same will be posted on the ADB website.

Pre-IOL and post-IOL consultations will be held with stakeholders and entitled parties. The approved social safeguard planning document will be disclosed to entitled parties and other stakeholders in accessible forms, languages and places, and posted on the ADB website. Monitoring reports during implementation will likewise be posted on the ADB website.

Monitoring at Project Implementation

Land National Agency (BPN) carries out the monitoring and evaluation towards the control, ownership, utilization and benefits of the results of the Land Acquisition for Development in the Public Interest. BPN is only responsible in the monitoring implementation phase and delivering result excluding planning and preparation stages.

Monitor and assess involuntary resettlement outcomes, their impacts on the standards of living of displaced persons, and whether the objectives of the RP has been achieved by taking into account the baseline conditions and the results of involuntary resettlement monitoring. Disclose monitoring reports.

English versions of social safeguard planning document implementation M & E reports will be submitted to the ADB and results posted on the ADB website

.

Consultation Reports Geothermal Power Generation Project

Initial Consultation with Affected Persons, Communities, and Stakeholders 18-26 March: 2019

A. BACKGROUND

1. The Asian Development Bank (ADB) will provide a loan to Geo Dipa Energi (GDE) to support expanded geothermal electricity generation in two locations in Patuha, West Java, and Dieng in Central Java. The project will result in an additional generating capacity of 55 MW at the existing Patuha geothermal plant in West Java and another 55 MW at the existing Dieng geothermal plant in Central Java. The outcome of the project is increased adequacy and sustainability of energy systems, while the project impacts are increased contribution to geothermal energy in Indonesian power supply and renewable energy in electricity sector. The project includes: (i) workover of existing wells and drilling of new wells; (ii) construction of fluid collection and injection systems, 55/55 MW power plants, transmission interconnection systems; (iii) enhanced corporate capacity, and (iv) enhanced livelihood of neighboring communities. 2. The project is categorized A both for environmental safeguard1 and resettlement safeguard2 and category C (no impacts) for the Indigenous people or customary communities following the ADB Safeguard Policy Statement (SPS). With the nature of project component and activities, the project is classified some gender element. Due diligence on safeguards and gender needs to be carried out and planning documents (Resettlement Plan and Social Audit, Environment Impact Assessment) need to be prepared, in addition to Summary Poverty Reduction and Social Strategy (SPRSS) and gender action plan (GAP). 3. The mission purposes is to conduct initial consultations with communities around the projects areas, potential affected persons, and stakeholders on environmental and social safeguards and gender for the two sub-projects (Patuha 2 and Dieng 2) under the proposed PGSP. The combined consultations conducted in partnership with GDE will be part of the due diligence and preparation of safeguards planning and gender action plan.

B. DISCUSSION AND MISSION FINDINGS

4. The initial consultations were conducted on 18 – 19 March 2019 for Patuha and on 20 – 22 March 2019 for Dieng. The consultations in Patuha were held in three villages (Villages of Sugihmukti, Alamendah, and Panundaan) and 6 villages in Dieng (Villages of Pranten, Kepakisan, Karang Tengah, Dieng Kulon, Bakal, and Sikunang). Consultations in Patuha were attended by 171 persons (132 (77%) male and 39 (23%) female), while in Dieng were attended by 183 persons (139 (76%) male and 44 (24%)female). Participants included community members (that include potential affected persons) living close to the project areas in affected 9 villages, representatives of village government, community-based organizations (including PKK, Karang Taruna, Bumdes, elderly groups), sub-district government, districts agencies (Social, environment, and BKSDA), GDE Headquarters and regional units, the TA consultants, and ADB. In addition, several

1 A proposed project is classified as category A if it is likely to have significant adverse environmental impacts that are

irreversible, diverse, or unprecedented. These impacts may affect an area larger than the sites or facilities subject to physical works. An environmental impact assessment is required. 2 The project is considered category A for involuntary resettlement if the activities would severely affect 200 or more persons defined as (I) being physically displaced, or (ii) losing 10% or more of their productive assets

interviews were also conducted with key informants that include land renters/users, village head, communities members.

5. The consultations were co-chaired by GDE representatives and the ADB team, and facilitated by EDF consultants. The consultations were started with the opening remarks from Village Head, Sub district head and followed by a short explanation from GDE on the on going project and the plan to expand the project (Patuha 2 and Dieng 2), short explanation from ADB on ADB SPS safeguards principles and gender and the purpose of the consultations. and general discussions. The consultations were followed up with the small group discussions focusing on social safeguards, environmental safeguards, and gender. Several questions, concerns, and suggestions were raised by participants covering the topics below.

6. Common issues arose in consultations across locations. Among them, many potentially affected people (AP) requested information about how to contact GDE in case of a concern. This highlights the urgent need for GDE to develop and communicate a process for gathering and managing concerns from affected communities. ADB’s social and environmental safeguards require a formalized grievance redress mechanism (GRM), and ADB consultants will work with GDE to develop one through due diligence. GDE’s current approach at the Dieng facility is summarized below, which is funded through the HSE operations budget for “incidents.”

Villagers with a complaint inform the local Kapala Desa Kapala Desa sends a letter to GDE

GDE checks the issue/impacted area to confirm and identifies a solution GDE works with

the relevant government agency to calculate the damages GDE and the Kapala Desa negotiate a solution and compensation 7. It is unclear if the GDE unit maintains a record of complaints or how it is communicated back

to Jakarta

1. Patuha 2 8. Table 1 presents the number of people consulted and gender breakdown of participants in each village.

Table 1. Participants of Consultations

Village 3 Sub-district (Kecamatan)

Total no. of participants

No and (%) of male participants

No and (%) of female participants

Sugihmukti Pasir Jambu 61 47 (77%) 14 (23%)

Alamendah Rancabali 51 45 (88%) 6 (12%)

Panundaan Ciwidey 59 40 (68%) 19 (32%)

Total 171 132 (77%) 39 (23%)

9. A brief context and main issues discussed during the consultations are presented in the following section.

10. Social Safeguards. The proposed Patuha-2 expansion involves additional land for two new wellpads, access roads, and pipeline lines (which may entail possible extension of steam pipeline ROWs). There will also be drilling of 7 new wells in existing wellpads (which will not entail

3 All three villages are located in District of Bandung.

land acquisition).4 Land to be acquired or leased for project expansion components are located in protected forest under the jurisdiction of PT Perhutani. The identified plots of land (approximately 2 ha in size per plot) are reportedly unencumbered (no AKPS5 permits have been issued). However, GDE and Perhutani will conduct a site reconnaissance on 23 March 2019 to determine whether there is any undocumented use of forest land in the area identified for the wellpads and access roads. Land required for new steam or injection lines will be leased from the above mentioned GLCs.

11. The exact location of land to be acquired has yet to be finalized. As such, no maps or indications of land to be acquired were shared at this stage of consultations. Only general information regarding the proposed Patuha-2 expansion was given to the participants. 12. Key concerns raised by participants include:

In general, this was the first occasion of public consultations for each village. The response to the consultations were positive. Villagers requested that such consultations be continued in the future as a mode of communication and information sharing. Residents affirmed their support for the project (Patuha-2) and up-coming project activities (further engagement/consultations, surveys etc.).

Participants felt that their livelihoods had not been affected by the presence of the Patuha -1 facility in their area. Therefore, no specific concerns were raised regarding potential negative impacts of Patuha-2 on their livelihoods.

While a number of participants articulated that they did not quite know what GDE was, and whom its operations were meant to benefit, participants in general affirmed that they have received some direct benefits in the form of GDE’s on-going CSR programs.6 However, participants also articulated a list of complaints.7 Participants took advantage of the forum to request various kinds of assistance from GDE.

In general, there was a sentiment that if GDE progresses, surrounding communities (wellbeing) should also be able to progress in tandem. (GDE maju, masyarakat maju.). In comparison, there was a difference in the disposition of the respective village communities towards GDE.8 Participants of the Panundaan Village consultation conveyed a generally more positive disposition towards GDE in terms of collaboration / partnership in enhancing the village’s fortunes.

13. Environmental safeguards. Key concerns raised by participants include:

Vibration and noise resulting during the mobilization/demobilization of heavy equipment and rigs to/from the Patuha project site via the village access roads at night time period (11 PM – 4AM). This has resulted in that few houses were reported to have their walls cracked and instances where their fences hit by the hauler long-trucks.

Airborne dust generated due to the daily traffic on the village access road to Patuha site via these villages, particularly during the dry season.

4 All land acquired for Patuha-1 in the 1980s was land that belonged to two Government-linked corporations (PT Perkebunan ________, and PT Perhutani). were acquired whereas land required for pipelines were leased on 10 year basis. 5 Akses kelola perhutanan sosial (AKPS) is a permit issued to communities / farmer groups to engage in social forestry on PT Perhutani managed forest. 6 Road construction, training provided to women’s groups, assistance with developing local tourism activities. 7 disturbances and damage caused by the regular passage of heavy vehicles in and out of the Patuha site, insufficient absorption of local manpower by GDE, and various other issues eg. incomplete status of road construction assistance (1.2 km) in Alamendah Village (documented in the Consultations Report). 8 See also results of the recent social mapping exercise by GDE.

Surface water availability (spring and stream) used for watering the commodity crops (i.e. potato, tomato and vegetables) reduces during the dry seasons. The community is curious whether this water reduction may be attributable to GDE operations and its future expansion requiring forest clearing. Further, the community also speculates whether the water they used for watering the vegetable crops has been impacted as the yield of those crops is reducing over time.

The community safety may be at risk during the construction phase due to mobilization/demobilization of heavy equipment and increased road traffic of project vehicles.

Bird poaching from the nearby protection forest was revealed in personal discussion with few community members and the personnel from the local Perhutani office (stated owned forestry company managing the protection forest). This activity is conducted by some community members either as a hobby or occasional source of income instead of the direct impact due to GDE operation.

The representatives from Panundaan ask how GDE will manage its construction wastes. Solid waste management in this village and others are reportedly lacking associated facilities and services from the local governments. They are concerned that if the construction waste are not well managed, it would impact to the ongoing waste management issues at Panudaan village, which is well known for its tourism and nature based recreational activities.

14. Gender. Local community, including women were interested to join the initial public consultation as they wanted to receive information about GDE community development program, environment issues, and other latest information. Women participants in consultations composed approximately 10% women in the morning sessions and 50% women in afternoon sessions. Thus, future public consultation should consider convenient time for women. 15. Key concerns raised by participants include:

Access to Information: Women villagers are usually not invited to village community meeting. Village office usually invite the PKK committees or representatives. Thus, only small number or women attend general village meeting. Main available local women organizations are PKK (Family Welfare) and Koran chanting group (pengajian). These organizations have regular meeting and serve as channel to disseminate information on various issues. Information from GDE (including on employment opportunities, community development programs, etc.) could make use of these channels.

Time Spent: Both men and women work morning from morning to noon. Men usually go to the field, while women villagers do multiple tasks (go to the field, take care of children and other domestic chores). In villages with issues of clean water, women have to collect water which may take 10 minutes to 3 hours (depending on distance, and queue of people lining for water). Thus, women have more limitation to get involved in public events such as community meetings.

Consumption: Apart from food, a big portion of household income is spent on children’s education. Since there are no high schools in the village, children have to commute and require daily transportation of about Rp. 15.000 – Rp. 30.000. Other family may spend around Rp. 1.500.000/month to cover accommodation and food for the children living outside the village. With this context men hopes that GDE through community development program provide a school bus, while women hope for high school to be built in/near the village.

Poverty: Poor households are found in all the villages visited. Social assistance programs namely Family Hope Program, Rice for Welfare, health insurance, etc. have

been carried out in these villages up to 10 years back. However, only a couple of people have got out of poverty not because they succeeded in running a business but because their children managed to have education and find a job that could support the family.

Livelihood: Proportionately more men engage in paid work than do women. The most common livelihood is agriculture (potato, carrots, onion, cabbage). Some women are self-employed in micro business (homestay, catering, sell snacks, online shop, etc.) and generally still face constraints in marketing their products/services. Women hope that GDE could (i) provide more job opportunities for local people including women (ii) provide community development programs that would support community livelihood (training, mentoring, partnership as vendor).

2. Dieng 2

16. Table 2. presents the number of people consulted and gender breakdown of participants in each village.

Table 2. Number of people consulted and gender breakdown of participants

Village Sub-district (Kecamatan)

Regency (Kabupaten)

Total no. of participants

No and (%) of male participants

No and (%) of female participants

Dieng Kulon Batur Banjarnegara 34 25 (74%) 9 (26%)

Kepakisan Batur Banjarnegara 20 10 (50%) 10 (50%)

Bakal Batur Banjarnegara 41 38 (93%) 3 (7%)

Karang Tengah Banjar Banjarnegara 38 28 (74%) 10 (26%)

Sikunang Kejajar Wonosobo 22 16 (73%) 6 (27%)

Pranten Bawang Batang 28 22 (79%) 6 (21%)

Total 183 139 (76%) 44 (24%)

17. The following section presents a brief context and main issues discussed during the consultations.

18. Social Safeguards. A large portion of the land in the Dieng Plateau has been gazette as heritage sites (Cagar Budaya), recognized by UNESCO and managed by the Provincial Tourism Agency, as well as protected forest (hutan lindung, situs). Land on which the Dieng Geothermal complex stands is owned by GDE9. The volcanic land in the Dieng Plateau is very arable. Potato farming and temperate vegetable cultivation has grown very fast in the area and much of the area outside the above areas has already been intensively cultivated and is privately owned. The area is densely populated, and there is practically no unutilized land available. Land owning farmers typically cultivate between 500 – 2,500 m2 of land, and also work as farm workers (buruh tani) on larger neigbouring farms (onwed by locals as well as investors from outside the area). A large number of farmers are landless and earn their daily income entirely as farm labourers. 19. The proposed Dieng-2 expansion will entail land acquisition for one new wellpad, access road, pipelines, a transmission line and transmission road. Most of the land to be acquired is privately owned. The transmission line will require land acquisition of privately owned land as well as protection forest (hutan lindung) land under the jurisdiction of PT Perhutani. Approximately 3 out of 6 ha of land already owned by GDE on which the new power plant will be built, will also

9 The Dieng Geothermal Plant was originally built by PT Pertamina but was sold to GDE in 2002

have to be cleared of encumbrances (existing cultivation of land) which will trigger social safeguards attention for lost livelihood opportunities among farm workers (buruh tani). 20. The exact location of land to be acquired has yet to be finalized. As such, no maps or indications of land to be acquired were shared at this stage of consultations. Only general information concerning the proposed Dieng-2 expansion was given to the participants by the team. 21. Key concerns raised by participants include:

In general, this was the first occasion of public consultations for each village. The response to the consultation was positive. Villagers requested that such consultations be continued in the future as a mode of communication, information sharing, consultations, and feedback regarding follow-up / resolution of issues raised. Villagers affirmed their support for more regular engagement in the future.

Residents have received some direct benefits in the form of GDE’s on-going CSR programs. However, participants also articulated a list of complaints and took advantage of the forum to request various kinds of further assistance from GDE.10

Participants conveyed an aspiration for inclusive development - that the local community should also progress as GDE progresses (GDE maju, masyarakat maju).

Based on agreements made in the past with PT Pertamina, and continued by GDE 11, unutilized land belonging to GDE was allowed to be cultivated by local farmers. In some areas, farmers were allotted 200 m2 areas per person to cultivate. - Farmers accept that this land must be vacated should GDE wish to utilize the

space. As such, they will not resist handing back the land to GDE. However, they requested that they be informed in advance and be given a grace period of 1 year (corresponding to two potato harvests) before relinquishing the occupied land.

- Consultation participants also indicated that they hope for GDE to provide them with guidance / solutions regarding how to replace this loss in livelihoods.

Participants in at least three villages (Dieng Kulon, Karang Tengah, and Sikunang) were apprehensive about the prospect of land acquisition impacts and their livelihoods and requested land replacement as the preferred form of compensation. If possible, they requested that replacement land be larger than the land they lose. In some villages (eg. Dieng Kulon), replacement land may not be available (demand far exceeds supply) and asking about the possibility of compensation with GDE land.12 The possibility of providing cows as an income restoration option was raised. Cows would mostly be tethered. These is ample fodder to be collected in the area.

The 6 hectares of GDE’s land to be used for proposed power plants in Karang Tengah Village is rented by 20 persons wit the rental cost amounting to Rp. 30 millions per year paid to GDE’s cooperative.This rental fee is much lower than the normal rental fee in Dieng. The total number of farm laborer is 30 persons. It is expected that compensation and assistance will be provided to the loss of job and livelihood.

The recent well blow-out and occasional leakage of steam caused some damage over the last two years to crops and zinc roofs among settlements of Praten Hamlet- Dieng close to and downwind of wellpad 30. GDE has paid compensation for lost crop and provided corrugated zinc sheets to replace corroded zinc roofs. However, there have been some complaints raised by residents regarding the adequacy of compensations by GDE for the damaged crops and assets (delays of compensation payment;

10 See the full Consultations Report for details of participants’ perceived benefits, complaints, hopes and requests. 11 Managed by KODIPA (GDE’s cooperative body) 12 The total GDE’ land in Dieng is about 150 hectares consisting of 18 hectares of forestry land with land use permit from Ministry of Forestry and 132 hectares of land owned by GDE.

compensation was only provided to farmers who have land ownership evidence/SKT, while many affected persons who have no SKT and cultivate forestry land, no compensation for corroded vehicles and doors and windows hinges). Some participants requested that GDE to review and raise the quantum of compensation. Residents claimed loss of planting period and income for 1 year and other damages

make many residents have to sell assets and engage in debt. - Although not arising from direct resettlement impacts, this is an area of overlap

between environmental and social safeguards concerns. Livelihood related remedial measures may be incorporated into the social safeguards provisions.

- A standard procedure for assessing and addressing similar impacts in the future may also need to address income restoration considerations above and beyond compensation.

The case of a turbine explosion at the power plant in 2015 resulted in damage to the roofs of residents' houses in Sikunang Village due to being crushed by fragments of iron material. Iron fragments also fell on the residents' fields. There was no compensation given by GDE and the residents did not demand compensation. Complaint was also raised by Sikunang residents in connection with the installation of steam and injection pipes which limited citizen access to agricultural land and resulted in a decline in land prices.

22. Environmental Safeguards. Key concerns raised by participants include:

All villages where consultations were conducted complained about the decline of water

quality since Dieng 1 was operating. Some spring water, especially those near drilling

wells, are no longer drinkable. The water smells of sulfur and salty and is getting salty

during the dry season. This caused the residents to look for other sources of water

that were suitable for drinking, which were located farther away from the village. Some

villages are forced to continue to use the contaminated spring water for drinking and

worry about the impact on their health. The residents in Sikuangan Village took their

own water sample to Gajahmada Univeristy (UGM) for analysis of contamination. They

claimed the results showed a positive test for sulfur content. GDE also took samples

in the area, but results showed negative.

The residents and the district Environmental Agency propose to conduct water tests

in an accredited laboratory and be informed about the results openly to the residents.

GDE’s HSSE staff conducted several water quality tests and informed that there was

no impact on the Dieng 1 operation on water quality and the residents doubted about

the results.

Two consulted villages complained pollution of wastewater from the Dieng 1 operation

to the spring water and the field located under the power plant or well which caused

the vegetable to die.

All consulted villages complained about the steam blowing from the Dieng 1 well which

resulted in accelerating the corrosion of the zinc roofs as well as objects made of iron.

The leakage of steam caused damages over the last two years to crops and zinc roofs

on settlements of Praten Hamlet close to wellpad 30. GDE has paid compensation for

lost crop and provided corrugated zinc sheets to replace corroded zinc roofs.

Residents claimed loss of planting period and income for 1 year and other damages

have made residents have to sell their assets and engaged in debt. The steam leaks

also caused the death of wood plants in the forests around the wellpad 30, which then

caused landslides in some parts of the protected forest hills. The residents also

claimed that the case of steam leak has also triggered the emergence of new steam

craters around the settlements, which will endanger the lives of the residents.

The turbine explosion at the power plant in 2015 has resulted in damage to the roofs

of residents' houses in Sikunang Village due to being crushed by fragments of iron

material. Iron fragments also fell on the residents' fields. The residents were worried

that similar case will occur and asked the Gedipa to guarantee the safety of the

residents living near the project.

A complaint was also raised by Sikunang residents in connection with the installation

of steam and injection pipes which limited their access to agricultural land and resulted

in a decline of the land prices. They requested to move the steam pipe installation. In

the past, at the start of construction, GDE said that the pipe installation was temporary

and would be moved. However, until now the pipe has never been moved.

Sikunang residents actually wanted to demonstrate against various problems due to

Deng 1's operation, but they are worried about the security of their lives.

Some residents and the Social Agency are worried about the beauty of Dieng due to

the many pipe installations. Dieng is a tourist area, the presence of large pipes in many

places certainly disturbs the beauty and might raise concerns by the tourists.

When cleaning the waste pipe is done, often the waste spills on the roadside, while

the waste contains silica, and this certainly endangers the environment and the health

of the residents.

Complaints from Karang Tengah’s residents against the installation of the steam pipe that closed the drainage channel and caused water from the hill flow into the village

and cause flooding. Some villages complained that there was no temporary garbage

disposal in the village and hoped that GDE would help to build a temporary dumping

place and a car carrying garbage to a landfill.

Two villages (Sikunang and Praten) complained about noise, especially at night from

power plants and hoped that GDE would reduce the noise.

Vibration due to heavy vehicle passing needs attention. Also, the impact on road

conditions and security, especially children because the road passed by the heavy

vehicles is very narrow.

Some residents stated that there is a possibility Javanese eagles in protected forests

near Dieng 1 and an impact study on this species is needed.

Some residents in Sikuang are concerned about the existence of transmission line to

the community safety and fertility of the land under the ROW

GDE is not friendly to the villagers and accepts workers from outside. It is only a few

communities work in GDE.

23. Suggestions and recommendation by participants to GDE are as follow;

GDE together with the communities take the water and soil samples that were

suspected of being contaminated and bring the samples to the accredited / reputable

laboratories to get the accurate results and inform the results to the communities.

GDE develop a complaint handling mechanism by: i) appointing active staff to visit

and to communicate with the residents as well as to record / receive complaints from

citizens to be conveyed to the GDE management for resolution; ii) There is a regular

meeting between GDE and the residents - as conducted in this safeguard

consultation for Dieng 2 - to discuss and resolve various issues faced by citizens

GDE build a B3 waste disposal site with a good standard and a transport mean to the

landfills.

GDE construct sidewalks, especially on residential areas, so that pedestrian security

is better maintained. GDE also needs to provide road safety funds because so far,

the residents have paid the contributions to people who carry out road safety,

especially near the schools.

GDE provides an opportunity for affected villagers, especially the closest villages to work

in GDE even as unskilled laborers.

24. Gender. Key concerns raised by participants were similar between Patuha and Dieng,

and thus summarized previously. 25. Indigenous People Safeguards. The GDE staff at regions and communities confirmed that no indigenous peoples living in the project areas.

Attachments: Appendix 1: Detailed consultation records Appendix 2 : List of participants

FFM: Stakeholder Consultation Reports Geothermal Power Generation Project

Stakeholder 2nd consultation in Dieng and Patuha with affected people, communities, and

key stakeholders

9-17 September 2019

A. BACKGROUND 1. The Asian Development Bank (ADB) will provide a loan to Geo Dipa Energi (GDE) to support expanded geothermal electricity generation in two locations in Patuha, West Java, and Dieng in Central Java. The project will result in an additional generating capacity of 55 MW at the existing Patuha geothermal plant in West Java and another 55 MW at the existing Dieng geothermal plant in Central Java. The outcome of the project is increased adequacy and sustainability of energy systems, while the project impacts are increased contribution to geothermal energy in Indonesian power supply and renewable energy in electricity sector. The project includes: (i) workover of existing wells and drilling of new wells; (ii) construction of fluid collection and injection systems, 55/55 MW power plants, transmission interconnection systems; (iii) enhanced corporate capacity, and (iv) enhanced livelihood of neighboring communities. 2. The project is categorized B both for environmental safeguard13 and resettlement safeguard14 and category C (no impacts) for the Indigenous people or customary communities following the ADB Safeguard Policy Statement (SPS). With the nature of project component and activities, the project is classified some gender element. Due diligence on safeguards and gender needs to be carried out and planning documents (Resettlement Plan and Social Audit, Environment Impact Assessment) need to be prepared, in addition to Summary Poverty Reduction and Social Strategy (SPRSS) and gender action plan (GAP). 3. The mission purposes is to conduct initial consultations with communities around the projects areas, potential affected persons, and stakeholders on environmental and social safeguards and gender for the two sub-projects (Patuha 2 and Dieng 2) under the proposed PGSP. The combined consultations conducted in partnership with GDE will be part of the due diligence and preparation of safeguards planning and gender action plan.

13

A proposed project is classified as category A if it is likely to have significant adverse environmental impacts that are

irreversible, diverse, or unprecedented. These impacts may affect an area larger than the sites or facilities subject to physical works. An environmental impact assessment is required. 14 The project is considered category A for involuntary resettlement if the activities would severely affect 200 or more persons defined as (I) being physically displaced, or (ii) losing 10% or more of their productive assets

B. DISCUSSION AND MISSION FINDINGS 4. The second stakeholder consultation were conducted in 6 villages from 11– 13 September 2019 for Dieng and in 3 villages in Patuha, from 16–17 September 2019. 5. The structure of both public consultations divided into three sessions: 1) opening sessions; 2) presentations of key findings and responses; 3) question and answers. Discussion was focus on progress has been made after 1st public consultation conducted in March 2019, and share the social safeguard finding (environment, social and gender) to the participant to gain their input. 6. Participants in Dieng included affected community members, representatives of village government, community-based organizations (including PKK, Farmer Group, Karang Taruna, Bumdes, elderly groups), camat (hear of sub-district government), districts agencies (ATR/BPN, Dinas Lingkungan Hidup), GDE headquarters and regional units, the TA consultants, and ADB. Discussion conducted with key stakeholders, that include land renters/users, village head, camat and communities’ members. Especially for Desa Karang Tengah the issue more focus on resettlement, that involve local government and village government to participate. The meeting lead by GDE Unit Project Manager with mixing presentation by GDE and ADB consultant team.

Table 1: Number of Participants in Dieng (11-13 September 2019)

VILLAGE DAY, DATE & TIME FEMALE MALE TOTAL

% %

Kepakisan Wednesday, 11 September 2019 – morning 3 14% 19 86% 22

Sikunang Wednesday, 11 September 2019 – afternoon 10 38% 16 62% 26

Bakal Thursday, 12 September 2019 – morning 4 14% 24 86% 28

Dieng Kulon Thursday, 12 September 2019 – afternoon 4 16% 21 84% 25

Karang Tengah Friday, 13 September 2019 – morning 23 39% 36 61% 59

Pranten Friday, 13 September 2019 – afternoon 8 44% 10 56% 18

Total 52 29% 126 71% 178

7. Participants in Patuha included affected community members, representatives of village government, community-based organizations (including PKK, Farmer Group, Karang Taruna, Bumdes, elderly groups), camat (hear of sub-district government), districts agencies (Dinas Lingkungan Hidup, and BKSDA), GDE headquarters and regional units, the TA consultants, and ADB. Discussion conducted with key stakeholders, that include land renters/users, village head, camat and communities members.

Table 2: Number of Participants in Patuha (16-17 September 2019)

VILLAGE DAY, DATE & TIME FEMALE MALE TOTAL

% %

Sugihmukti Monday, 16 September 2019 – morning 20 22% 69 78% 89

Alam Endah Monday, 16 September 2019 – afternoon 33 52% 30 48% 63

Panundaan Tuesday, 17 September 2019 – morning 29 43% 39 57% 68

Total 82 37% 138 63% 220

8. The discussion went well, interactive and in-depth dialogue to make them understand ADB consultant finding, being discus and seeking their input to understand their concern. Several common issues raised and identified, that classified into following table. 9. Overall, the consultations went well. Participants see positive aspects of the consultations. Communities have received direct benefit through GDE’s community development program. Most concerns responded to in safeguards assessments; some still require GDE’s attention. Common issues raised: Dieng

Most critical: power plant location (Karang Tengah)

Social: Opportunities of jobs at GDE, community development programs to the communities.

Environment: Noise, community risks, water pollution/abstraction, impact during construction.

Gender: GDE’s support to women. Communication: Project Information, scope and benefit in written

Common issues raised: Patuha

Opportunity to job and business opportunities at GDE, including for women.

GDE to provide more sustainable and strategic community development program.

Transparancy of the program to communities.

Dust and noise impacts during construction

Project Information, scope and benefit in written

C. Social Safeguards: Dieng

12. The expansion of the existing Dieng Geothermal Plant will require a total of 316,810 m2 (31.8 ha). Of this, 313,800 m2 (99 %) is already owned by Geo Dipa, while 3,010m2 is privately owned land. This will be acquired for a new pipeline and road access along 400 m connecting well pad 9 to the Dieng-2 power plant site. Transmission line would be laid underground, along new and existing pipeline and inspection road ROWs all to way to the existing sub-station (approximately 6 km) which has less social and environmental impact. 13. According to Inventory of Losses (IOL) census carried out in August 2019, documented approximately 4.02 ha of land in the Ex PLN’s land earmarked for construction of the Dieng-2 power plant that has been leased to a farmer group (comprising 23 members and 4 coordinators). Most of the other Geo Dipa owned land identified for construction of sub-project components are unencumbered except for 1 small plot of land (471 m2) in the pipeline ROW between well pad 7 to well pad 10 which occupied by one farmer. Land acquisition and cessation of activities on land currently owned by GDE identified for Dieng-2 development will affect 107 persons (33 households). All AHs reside in the village of Karang Tengah, (Kecamatan Batur, Kabupaten Banjarnegara). Key concerns: 14. Participants see positive aspects of the consultations and expect on-going consultation throughout the project cycle. Written information also requested rather than verbal information. One community leader from Pranten said so far communication between GDEs and community is formal, and they has been less involved in the village or community events (weddings, religious ceremony etc). Communication was done formally. Further he hope more informally approach from GDEs which make local community feel equal and prioritized.

15. Social issues raised by participants partly the same as March consultation 2019, but the submission of objection was softer. Some of those concerns/issues have been addressed during the consultations and in safeguards plans, but some need to be considered for improvement of mitigation measures and require GDEs attention. 16. All participants in six villages expressed their expectation to involve in the projects as a construction labor. They asked GDE prioritize local people/neighboring communities for work at GDE and information preference through village offices, not “paguyuban” and various medias. This concerns have been included in the RP by providing opportunities to project related jobs not only for vulnerable and severely AHs, but will expanded to community in all six villages. GDE’s ensure to include provision priority of local people for project related jobs in the EPC’s contract and GDE’s recruitment requirements for Geo Dipa’s jobs and business opportunities. 17. Training and mentoring on mechanic and welding for youth has been design by GDE’s to give more skill which will enable and empower youth to work in non-farming sector, including opportunity to work in GDE Dieng unit as skill worker. 18. Participants in general affirmed that they have received some direct benefits in the form of GDE’s on-going CSR, but they expected GDE to continue providing community development program: support to education, youth program, waste management and sustainable environment development, SMEs training and inputs. One of woman participant from Pranten village said SMEs training for improving women skills is better (more sustainable) rather than ‘micro credit” program which applied by Dieng 1. This concern has been included in the RP. GDEs need to design of sustainable and strategic community development program with gender perspective as part of GDE’s PKBL/CSR and disclose it on communities Patuha. 19. Decreasing of drinking water quality (potential contamination) and reduce of water supply during dry season was articulated at least by participants from Kepakisan, Sikunang, Dieng Kulon and Pranten. They requested GDE to provide water supply program to mitigate this issue. Participant from Bakal Village worried their water resource (spring) which located surrounding propose new well in ex PLNs land will be contaminated. They asked further assessment on this issue to anticipate their worried. 20. All participants worried about damages during project construction, learning from the case of Dieng 1 which not repaired properly15. Written agreement on compensation for damaged or lost assets/public facilities during project construction asked by Bakal and Karang Tengah community. Entitlements for impacts during project construction have been included in the RP GDEs need to emphasized this obligation in the project contractor’s contract. 21. A coordinator of renter (Ex PLN’s land) expressed negative perceptions about the project and assume the project will make residents suffer. Increasing of noise will disturb people because their settlement is located very close to propose power plant. Further He asked proper compensation for tenant farmer and coordinator. The village head stated that he personally did not approve the location of the power plant in Karang Tengah.

15Among others e.g. concrete village road used for access road which repaired below specification; water pipeline was

broken but not repair until now; Dieng Kulon village road use for heavy equipment access excavated by GDE for temporary drainage was not repaired up to now.

22. Compensation and assistance for sharecroppers have been presented in the consultations and included in the RP. Further consultations with APs on land acquisition procedure, entitlements including for coordinator of renters and village head.

D. Social Safeguards: Patuha

23. The majority of land required for the Patuha 2 subproject is owned by GDE; additional 26,000 m2 (or 2.6 ha) land required for Wellpad 9 (Loc BB), and right-of-way (ROW) for new pipeline and inspection road between Well pad 9 (Loc BB) to Well pad 4 (Loc G). Those additional land is located in forest area and tea plantation with no occupation or use by people. An principle permit for forest land and extension of tea plantation land leasing need to be secured prior to commencement of construction activities. Key concerns: 24. All participants supported the project. Issues raised by local communities from the three villages affected by project are similar which was related to opportunity to work in the project, continue of community development program and concerns on the impact during construction. 25. GDE is requested to prioritize neighboring communities, especially youth group for working at GDE both during construction and operation as well. There are many local youth communities have skill because they have technical vocational high school background. Head of Sugihmukti Village expected information regarding job opportunity preference through village offices or “RW”. 26. Response to this request, GDE said that the expectation is in line with the GDE Unit Patuha management policy, and have been applied for Patuha 1. Many local communities works in Patuha 1 as a skill worker. Communities recognized GDE’s support to the community development and expected GDE to continue providing community development program. The program be provided to village office or Bumdes. CDP include economic empowerment, local art empowerment, opportunities for communities as sub-contractor for GDE, support village infrastructure program. Response to this request, GDEs commit to continue implementing community development program that will pay attention to communities need, but in another hand GDE’s program is limited and will support the program based on priority. 27. Heavy equipment access will use the existing road along the three villages. Learnt from the case of Patuha I, all participants expressed their worries on increasing noise and dust during construction. Some participants asked the GDE to mitigate by avoiding mobilization during night time, but many of them also asked compensation due to noise disturbance. They asked compensation not only given to community along the access road (as what ever done in Patuha 1) but to all villagers proportionally.

E. Gender: Dieng

28. The second Public consultations in Dieng were conducted in 6 villages (Kepakisan, Sikunang, Bakal, Dieng Kulon, Karang Tengah, and Pranten) from 11-13 September 2019. These public consultations were carried out in three sessions, namely: 1) opening sessions; 2) presentations of key findings and responses from first consultation; 3) question and answers. 29. As shown in the Table 3, a total of 178 people, comprising of 52 women (29%) and 126 men (71%) who were representatives of village officials, community leaders, CBO (PKK, Posyandu, Bumdes) participated in the second public consultation.

Table 3: Number of Participants in the Dieng Second Public Consultation

VILLAGE DAY, DATE & TIME FEMALE MALE TOTAL

% %

Kepakisan Wednesday, 11

September 2019 –

morning

3 14% 19 86% 22

Sikunang Wednesday, 11

September 2019 –

afternoon

10 38% 16 62% 26

Bakal Thursday, 12 September

2019 – morning

4 14% 24 86% 28

Dieng Kulon Thursday, 12 September

2019 – afternoon

4 16% 21 84% 25

Karang Tengah Friday, 13 September

2019 – morning

23 39% 36 61% 59

Pranten Friday, 13 September

2019 – afternoon

8 44% 10 56% 18

Total 52 29% 126 71% 178

30. Compared to the first public consultations (see Table 4), there were more women participating in the second public consultations. From both the first and second public consultations (see Table 3), out of 361 participants, there was a total of 96 women (27%).

Table 4: Number of Participants in 1st public consultation (Dieng, March) VILLAGE DAY, DATE & TIME FEMALE MALE TOTAL

% %

Pranten Thursday, 21 March –

morning

6 21% 22 79% 28

Kepakisan Thursday, 21 March –

afternoon

10 50% 10 50% 20

Karang Tengah Friday, 22 March

2019 – morning

10 26% 28 74% 38

Dieng Kulon Friday, 22 March

2019 – afternoon

9 26% 25 74% 34

Bakal Saturday, 23 Sep

2019 – morning

3 7% 38 93% 41

Sikunang Saturday, 23 Sep

2019 – afternoon

6 27% 16 73% 22

Total 52 29% 126 71% 183

Table 5: Number of Participants in: 1st and 2nd public consultation (Dieng)

VILLAGE 1st PUBLIC CONSULTATION 2nd PUBLIC CONSULTATION 1st & 2nd PUBLIC CONSULTATION

FEMALE MALE TOTA

L

FEMALE MALE TOTA

L

FEMALE MALE TOTA

L

%

% %

% %

%

Pranten 6 21% 22 79% 28 8 44% 10 56% 18 14 30% 32 70% 46

Kepakisan 10 50% 10 50% 20 3 14% 19 86% 22 13 31% 29 69% 42

Karang

Tengah

10 26% 28 74% 38 23 39% 36 61% 59 33 34% 64 66% 97

Dieng Kulon 9 26% 25 74% 34 4 16% 21 84% 25 13 22% 46 78% 59

Bakal 3 7% 38 93% 41 4 14% 24 86% 28 7 10% 62 90% 69

Sikunang 6 27% 16 73% 22 10 38% 16 62% 26 16 33% 32 67% 48

Total 44 24% 139 76% 183 52 29% 126 71% 178 96 27% 265 73% 361

31. Consistent to the first public consultations held in March 2019, the second public consultation had high numbers of women participants when meetings were conducted in the afternoon and on Friday as it is a holiday in Dieng. 32. It is noted that in the second public consultation, there was high participation in Karang Tengah Village which has been identified as the most affected village. Out of 59 participants, 23 (39%) were women. Despite there were high number of women participants, not one woman spoke during the meeting. The meeting in Karang Tengah was held on Friday morning and started late due to some miscommunication regarding the invitation. The meeting was dominated by male villagers addressing objection and negative impacts regarding Geo Dipa project. Key Concerns 33. Access to information on Job and Business Opportunity. Both men and women in all the 6 villages are keen to obtain information about skilled and unskilled job opportunities as well as business opportunities from Geo Dipa Unit 2 project. Women participants said that currently there is lack of information about job and business opportunities. 34. A woman in Bakal Village suggested that information on job and business opportunities should be disseminated using various media such as flyer, banner, and WhatsApp application. A man in Bakal Village added that information disseminated through flyer, banner and WhatsApp should also use simple language. These concerns have been incorporated in the Gender Action Plan (GAP), namely: in 1.1.1. contract documents for contractors include requirements/provisions for employing at least XX% women; 1.1.3. at least XX% of local people hired, including local women; 3.1.1. stakeholder communication strategy includes (1) participation of at least 30% women in community consultation meetings; (2) separate meetings for women; (3) gender sensitive principles for printed, audio and visual materials; (4) Use of different media (e.g. flyer, banner, WhatsApp) in order for information to reach women. 35. Community Development Programs. Various suggestions related to Geo Dipa Community Development Programs were addressed, namely: 1) livelihood programs in the form of trainings for small-medium enterprises and provision of equipment particularly for potato drying, processing and packaging (addressed by women from Sikunang, Bakal and Pranten Village). A woman in Pranten village stressed that training programs are more sustainable than micro credit programs. She also said that local people may not be able to repay loans. A woman in Sikunang Village requested that existing youth training provided by Geo Dipa to include women youths in order to provide equal opporunity; 2) Focus on sustainable environment programs in particular waste management, and renewable energy training programs. In addition to that, community development programs should include monitoring activities, including monitoring of previous tree-planting activities which are now left abandoned (addressed by woman from Dieng Kulon); 3) provision of early education/preschool (addressed by woman from Kepakisan Village); 4) improvement of roads and bridges (addressed by woman from Bakal Village). These concerns have been addressed in Gender Action Plan (GAP) 3.3.1. at least 30% women participate in the planning, implementation, monitoring and evaluation of community development program, and 3.3.2. separate meetings for women are conducted to identify women’s priorities and needs. With this GAP action and target, the expected result would be that local women and men jointly with Geo Dipa identify focus, priorities and strategic activities for the community development programs, including targets to be monitored and evaluated.

36. Health and Safety Issues. A woman in Sikunang Village expressed concerns about truck/heavy vehicles passing through narrow village roads with water pipes crossing over these roads, meanwhile children play on these roads. She requested that Geo Dipa should arrange trucks/heavy vehicles to pass the village roads in the evenings for the safety of children, and to reduce noise. In addition to that, if truck drivers caused damage to the water pipes, then they/Geo Dipa should provide compensation to the owners/villagers. Quality of village roads was also addressed, particularly to request funding from district government to improve the condition of roads owned and managed by the district government. This issue has been addressed in safeguards through the establishment of Grievance Mechanism, including Grievance Committee. In addition to that under Gender Action Plan (GAP) 1.3.1. at least XX% members in GRC are women, in order to create women friendly grievance channels.

F. Gender: Patuha

37. Table 4 below show a total of 220 people, comprising of 82 women (37%) and 138 men (63%) who were representatives of village officials, community leaders, CBO (PKK, Posyandu, Bumdes) participated in the second public consultation.

Table 6: Number of participants in the 2nd public consultation (Patuha)

VILLAGE DAY, DATE & TIME FEMALE MALE TOTAL

% %

Sugihmukti Monday, 16 September 2019 – morning 20 22% 69 78% 89

Alam Endah Monday, 16 September 2019 – afternoon

33 52% 30 48% 63

Panundaan Tuesday, 17 September 2019 – morning

29 43% 39 57% 68

Total 82 37% 138 63% 220

38. Compared to the first public consultations (see Table x), there were more women participating in the second public consultations. From both the first and second public consultations (see Table 6), out of 391 participants, there was a total of 121 women (31%).

Table 7: Number of participants in the 1st public consultation (Patuha, March)

VILLAGE DAY, DATE & TIME FEMALE MALE TOTAL

% %

Sugihmukti Monday, 18 March 2019 – afternoon 12 20% 49 80% 61

Alam Endah Tuesday, 19 March 2019 – morning 9 18% 42 82% 51

Panundaan Tuesday, 19 March 2019 – morning 18 31% 41 69% 59 Total 39 23% 132 77% 171

Table 8: Number of participants in the 1st public consultation (March 2019)

and 2nd public consultation (September 2019) in Patuha

VILLAGE 1st PUBLIC CONSULTATION 2nd PUBLIC CONSULTATION 1st & 2nd PUBLIC CONSULTATION

FEMALE MALE TOTAL FEMALE MALE TOTAL FEMALE MALE TOTAL

% % % % % %

Sugihmukti 12 20% 49 80% 61 20 22% 69 78% 89 32 21% 118 79% 150

Alam Endah 9 18% 42 82% 51 33 52% 30 48% 63 42 37% 72 63% 114

Panundaan 18 31% 41 69% 59 29 43% 39 57% 68 47 37% 80 63% 127

Total 39 23% 132 77% 171 82 37% 138 63% 220 121 31% 270 69% 391

39. It is noted that in the second public consultation, there was high participation in Sugih Mukti Village. Out of 89 participants, 20 (22%) were women. Despite there were high number of women participants, not one woman spoke during the meeting. Key Concerns 40. In general key concerns addressed during the second public consultations in Patuha were similar to the ones in Dieng namely: 1) job and business opportunities; 2) requests/ suggestions for Geo Dipa’s community development programs, particularly livelihood programs in the form of trainings and provisions of equipment; 3) concerns over heavy vehicles passing by the village roads. In addition to these, women and men in Panundaan Village suggested that Geo Dipa’s community development programs to not focus on community empowerment (i.e. capacity building) but to also include infrastructure development and provision of food and nutrition for children.

G. ENVIRONMENT

DIENG – Key environmental issues and concerns raised 41. Key environmental issues and concerns raised by the participants at the Public Consultation of Dieng Unit 2 development are noted below. The participants of Bakal and Karang Tengah are generally more curious and indicated higher level of concerns due to the future development of Dieng Unit 2 in Karang Tengah compared to those of Dieng Kulon, Pranten, Sikunang, and Kepakisan who are gradually accustomed to the existing operation of Dieng Unit 1. 42. The environmental issues and concerns shared among these villages are as follows:

Inconsistent delivery of project information related to Dieng Unit 2.

They expected an MOU between GDE and the village government as a form of commitment that would uphold the community’s rights to seek compensation if the project causes environmental deterioration and disturbance to the community such as elevated noise level, frequent H2S smell and exposure from the gas emitted from the rock muffler, and saline water in the community’s wells.

The community representatives are still curious whether the operation of Dieng Unit 1 has caused accelerated corrosion of the galvanized zinc roof used by many houses in the area. Further, the wonder if Dieng Unit 2 may also cause this problem.

Request for trash bins for the houses and supports for training and equipment for solid waste composting in the light of district government service on solid waste management.

Overflow from brine water ponds that could result in soil erosion and uncontrolled drainage to crop farming areas in the proximity.

GDE and/or its contractors to be mindful about muddy and dusty road caused by the vehicles entering and exiting the well pads and community safety within the proximity of school and market to avoid collision between vehicles and people.

The participants wonder if exposure to H2S gas and emission from the rock muffler may cause health effects

Perceived risks that GDE operation has resulted in reduced water flow of the river and community’s wells particularly during the dry season.

Reparation or replacement of public facilities such as road and properties such as clean water pipeline damaged by the project.

43. The environmental issues and concerns specific to future Dieng Unit 2 projects and raised by the public consultation participants from Karang Tengah and Bakal villages, are as follows:

Setulu, Sedendam, and Siranti springs are reported by the community representatives as the main clean water sources for the household and farming activities. There is a perceived risk that the construction and operation of Dieng Unit 2 at Karang Tengah village would impact availability and quality of these springs as it is in their perception these water sources flow underneath the Karang Tengah village.

One of the land renter coordinator (Mr Nasrullah) at the GDE’s owned land (ex-mess PLN) indicated his objections that the Dieng Unit 2 will be constructed at this particular site. Concerns over what the safe distance (buffer zone) between the future Dieng Unit 2 and the nearest residential areas at Karang Tengah should be.

PATUHA - Key environmental issues and concerns raised 44. Key environmental issues and concerns raised by the participants at the Public Consultation of Patuha Unit 2 development are noted below. The participants of all three villages, i.e., Sugih Mukti, Panundaan, and Alam Endah shared similar environmental issues and concerns as follows:

Patuha Unit 2 activities should be aligned with the requirements of the approved ANDAL and RKL-RPL (2010).

Community’s unawareness of the Company’s emergency response, handling and communication system in the event of toxic gas/H2S release and other emergency situations.

Mobilization/demobilization of heavy vehicles and equipment at night time is avoided as not to cause disturbance to the residents living in the proximity of the access road from/to the main Ciwidey road to GDE’s project sites; and if this activity must be conducted at night time, the community expects a fair compensation.

All sections of the access road to GDE’s project site to reduce airborne dust. Water spraying should be conducted during dry season to reduce airborne dust.

Community safety on the road should be prioritized by providing “zebra cross’ and signage near the school and mitigation to avoid collision between vehicles and heavy equipment with the community and minimizing public and private property damages.

Reparation or replacement of public facilities such as road and properties such as clean water pipeline damaged by the project.

45. No environmental issues were noted as specific to individual villages.

H. Communication and Information Sharing

46. Overall the FFM and consultation was success. For communication and sharing information, the issue divided into 2 sections, which are: external and internal communication. Issue related to external communication mainly raised related information availability by the project, especially written information. Internal communication more to SOP and coordination between GDE HQ and Units. 47. Dieng

Below is common issues raised related to communication and information:

Critical issue is information about power plant: location, what will happen in Karang Tengah, Dieng.

Corporate issue: what is GDE? Project perception need to be built to increase understanding about project

Understanding substance of geothermal and how it operates: technology wise, social and environmental impact.

Project’s scope, benefits and impacts, and how to mitigate. Project timeline

Complaints mechanism. Recruitment & Work opportunities. Production bonus

Community Development, Livelihood restoration, Capacity Building, Environment and Biodiversity.

48. Patuha

Below is common issues raised related to communication and information:

Spesific issue related to the project are wild hunter, biodiversity and conservation area. Need better engagement with BKSDA Patuha, Aspinal foundation, as strategic partner to make a way for GDE to achieve green PROPER (government highest recognition for BUMN that able to manage environmental issue wisely).

Corporate issue: what is GDE? Project perception need to be built to increase understanding about project

Understanding substance of geothermal and how it operates: technology wise, social and environmental impact.

Project’s scope, benefits and impacts, and how to mitigate. Project timeline

Complaints mechanism. Recruitment & Work opportunities. Production bonus

Community Development, Livelihood restoration, Capacity Building, Environment and Biodiversity.

49. Internal communication: GDE staff have to increase project understanding between project team members (HQ and units), to have the same level of understanding on the project and management issues, emerging trends and threats, coordination, and project planning for efficient functioning of project implementation. Including to develop internal rule: protocol communication, SOP for stakeholder engagement, GRM, emergency situation and recruitment. This also including capacity building for GDE on how to communicate and engage the community, and develop communication tools (project Information, timeline, scope, benefits, impacts and how to mitigate). Attachments: Appendix 1: Detailed consultation records Appendix 2 : List of participants

1

Abridged translation of Consultations with Local NGOs and Individual Development Practitioners involved in Dieng

Two consultation meetings were conducted with local NGOs on 30 August and 1 October

2019.1 Although five NGOs were invited, only one (ISDI) was able to attend the meeting on

30 August. Of eight local NGOs invited to attend the second meeting, six attended. Table 1

provides the list of local NGOs who participated in consultations regarding the Dieng-2

Geothermal Expansion sub-project (Dieng-2).

Table 1: List of Local NGOs consulted concerning the Dieng-2 Sub-project

Date Name of Local NGOs and Individuals involved in Dieng

Reprented by

30 August 2019

1) Inclusive Social Development Initiative (ISDI). Universiti Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga, Yogyakarta.

Dr. Ahmad Salehuddin

1 October 2019

2) Komunitas Pencinta Lingkungan Lembah Seroja and Faciltator for Watu Wulung Village

3) WALHI, Jawa Tengah – represented by one of its members NGOs (Jaringan Kerja Pemberdayaan Masyarakat, Wonosobo)

Tommy

4) Facilitator for BPDAS2 Seraya Opak Progo

Sekti

5) PUNCEN, Yogyakarta Yudho Indardjo

6) Pegiat Lingkungan Wonosobo Fahruddin

7) Former Director of WALHI Yogyakarta Suparlan

1 The consultations were mediated by Dr. R. Y. Zakaria (SES Consultant) as part of the SES contract. 2 BPDAS – Badan Pengelola Daerah Aliran Sungai (River Basin Management Authority)

2

Title : Social and Environmental Dynamics in the Dieng area (Q & A format)

Time and Place: 9 – 11 am, 30 August 2019, KARSA Meeting Space, Jambon,

Yogyakarta

Participants: R.Y. Zakaria, Dr. Ahmad Salehuddin, ISDI, and Arum Widayatsih3

Date: 30 August 2019

Summary of Discussion

1. Religiosity is very high in the Dieng area, but in their interaction with nature, they exploit

land without allowing for a fallow period. There is a very strong link between religion and

agriculture in Dieng (theologisation of agriculture). Agriculture is a form of worship. All

forms of activities in Dieng have a religious justification – the Hajj pilgrimage,

construction of mosques and musholla, various religious rituals. There are a number of

Quran reciting groups and religious organizations in Dieng4. The process of religious

intensification started in Kejajar and moved gradually up to Dieng. “Dieng” means “Holy (di) Land (Eng)”. Part of the reason local people migrated to and are willing to cope with

the cold climate of Dieng is because they feel they are closer to God.

2. How do local people reconcile the contradiction between religious values and

exploitation of nature ? The local communities practice many religious rituals – mainly in

the form of prayers for well-being / safety (keselamatan). Local communities spend up to

Rp. 750 million on an annual event called TPQ, and up to Rp. 150 million every 70 days

on a ritual called neton Sabtu Wage which is hosted on a revolving basis among village

hamlets (Dusun).

3. Do local people have any complaints or reservations about this ? It is clear to outsiders

that potato farming has caused a big problem in Dieng. But local communities do not

realise these effects. Among other things, there is a stunting of children in the sense that

the religious education that children are obliged to obtain from local pondok do not

adequately equip them with necessary knowledge and education.

Now that potato farming is experiencing a crisis, the economic problem will be inherited

by the new (millennial) generation. Any development interventions need to target this

generation (with its own educational shortcomings). Dieng has been the object of

different forms of tourism from past times. This is a viable sector to develop.

4. Does tourism cause tension within the local Dieng community ? The millennial

generation tends to choose tourism as preferred economic activity. However, there was

a case where tourism was rejected by Sembungan Village residents as being in conflict

with local sensitivities. Over the course of time, the concept of syariah tourism and

3 Venue Host (KARSA) 4 IPNU, IPPNU, GP Anshor, and Muslimat NU.

3

homestays has developed – where unmarried men and women are not allowed to share

the same tent or room.

Under one of its KKN5 support programs, ISDI volunteers supported the preparation of a

“Roadmap to Tourism” which was presented to the Head of Sikunang Village. The older generation is not so favourably disposed towards the prospects of tourism development.

Initiatives need to target the younger generation.

Title : Social and Environmental Dynamics in the Dieng area

Time and Place: 9 – 11 am, 1 October 2019, KARSA Meeting Space, Jambon,

Yogyakarta

Participants: R.Y. Zakaria, Yudho, Sekti, Parlan, Tommy, Aris, Tyas and Arum

Widayatsih

Date: 1 October 2019

Summary of Discussion

1. Involvement in the Dieng area

Yudho Indardjo (PUNCEN) – was involved for 2 months over 2013/2014 in

providing assistance to create spatial data for the Tulis River Basin (DAS) area

(including Karang Tengah Village area).

Sekti (BPDAS facilitator) – Involved intermittently between 2009 – 2014 in collecting

data to establish database re: watershed and environmental conditions, and

consulted worked with local communities toward supporting Kabupaten, Provincial

and National Government objectives for developing tourism in the Dieng Plateau. .

2. Issues concerning the environment and agriculture.

The Tulis watershed (DAS Tulis) is divided into three sections. The upper

watershed area is characterized by high intensity of land slides, extensive and

intensive potato farming. In the middle watershed area, there are more tree crops

and other food crops (eg. maize). There is a lot of salak cultivation in the lower

watershed area.

Efforts to improve livelihoods in the upper watershed area (eg. coffee development,

distribution of goats, and honey production, introduction of eucalyptus and

mountain pine trees) have not been successful.

When the Dieng geothermal plant was under Indonesia Power, soil erosion and

landslides due to potato farming threatened power plant facilities. This was

mitigated by the planting of trees.

Local people are not happy that they have to pay full price for electricity when

electrical power is being generated in their own backyard. The idea of local

communities being shareholders in geothermal power generation was raised.

5 Kuliah Kerja Nyata (community development facilitation activities by undergraduate)

4

3. JKPM (Jaringan Kerja Pemberdayaan Masyarakat)’s Perspective

The Dieng environment has become degraded because of potato farming. Soil is

no longer fertile.However, JKPM has not encountered this issue as a source of

conflict between local communities and Geodipa.

The issues raised concerning Geodipa were insufficient labour absorption from

among local communities into Geodipa operations.

The fast pace of tourism development in the Dieng area has created a garbage

problem which has not been adequately addressed to date.

4. JKPM – “Dieng is dying”. Dieng is declining not only from the environmental problems but also from socio-

economic problems. What seems to be boom times attributed to high value crops

does not benefit everyone, only a few. Many people are working just to cope with

debt.

Tourism (albeit with its garbage problem) provides a promising solution.

Local farmers are not free. The situation is complex.

What can Government and other organisations do to improve the situation in Dieng

?

There is a fear that Geothermal energy exploitation will progress, but conditions of

local people worsen.

5. JKPM - Improvement of Alternative Economic Options

JKPM is supporting local people to cultivate Batavica eggplant (terung belanda) and

carica as alternative economic crops because they are low cost crops. These crops may

be sold as is or further processed. Local people must see the results before they adopt

new things.

6. JKPM - Changing the mindset of Dieng Society

While this is difficult, it is also very important to do so. Local people do not know

how to manage money (big profits).

We have worked with local communities to recycle garbage.

Village Government capacity is weak and needs to be strengthened to better bring

about development. This is very important because local communities respect local

Government leaders.

7. Waste management.

Awareness building (socialization) in stages.

Children-oriented strategy (over the last 3 months) – pay for school books by

collecting garbage. Parents also get involved.

5

8. Activities in the Seroja Valley.

Coffee planning in Sembungan Village.

The CSR program of Band Indonesia constructed a waste recycling facility in

Sembungan as well as Sikunang Villages.

Not yet successful because no buyers for recycled products.

Introduction of an on-line application (RAPEL) which buys alumiminum coated

plastic waste for recycling.

Currently, there are 14 villages with garbage banks.

9. Religious entry point for interventions

Local people are very religious from the perspective of intensity of rituals, religious

activities, number and grand places of worship. Local people a disposed to

spending money for religious purposes. This disposition is relevant for intervention

strategies in Dieng.

For example, one intervention tried to prepare a Book of Sermons concerning

agriculture. This approach is important, because religious leaders are respected in

Dieng and have influence on people’s behavior.

10. Summary of Main Issues in Dieng

Garbage

Water supply (conservation)

Educational stunting. Per 2018, a number of villages6 in Kecamatan Kejajar have

been classified as Red Zone and require appropriate Government attention.

6 Campursari, Sikunang, Sureng and Tieng,

6

Attachments

Attendance Sheet

Photos of NGO Consultation Sessions (KARSA Meeting Space, 1 Oct.19)

1

Social Safeguards content for PROJECT INFORMATION BOOKLET

Dieng-2 Geothermal Expansion Sub-project

What is the Dieng-2 Sub-project?

The proposed Geothermal Power Generation Project will support expansion of Indonesia’s geothermal generating capacity to contribute to the sustainability and sufficiency of the electricity system, aligned with

Sustainable Development Goal 7: access to affordable, reliable, sustainable and modern energy for all. The

Dieng Geothermal Expansion sub-project (Dieng-2) will include (a) drilling of new wells for geothermal fluid

production and re-injection, (b) construction of fluid collection and re-injection systems, (c) power plant, and

(d) transmission inter-connection systems. The project will strengthen GDE’s capacity to plan for, develop,

and operate geothermal power plants, including management of complex technical conditions, multiple

coordinated contracts, and environmental risks. The project will support enhancement of GDE’s Community Development Program through more strategic engagement with the communities and evaluation of

programs that can most meaningfully contribute to improved well-being.

Dieng 2 project is located in Wonosobo and Banjarnegara District, Central Java Province

Figure 1: Proposed Power Plant, Wells and SAGS for Dieng-2 Geothermal Expansion sub-project

2

Figure 2: Proposed Underground Transmission Line route for Dieng-2 Geothermal Expansion sub-project

What is benefit of project to the community

General (benefits to others)

Electrical power generation (other consumers).

Clean energy source (Indonesia and the world).

Benefits for Local Communities

Improved communications, and awareness building.

Improved complaints handling (GRM).

Modified HR approach (more employment for local people, transparent recruitment, identify

future needs, prepare potential local youth for positions) - TBC

More strategic CSR / ComDev strategy and program (responsive to livelihood security

challenges).

1. Environmental safeguards contents (provided by ENV team – to be inserted)

3

Social Safeguards:

What are the impacts of the Dieng 2 project to the community surrounding?

The expansion of the existing Dieng Geothermal Plant will require a total of 30.83 ha. Of this, 30.53 ha (99)

of land is already owned by PT Geo Dipa Energi (GDE) Land acquisition and clearing will only be required

for two sub-project components :

i) Acquisition of 3,010 m2 of privately owned land for a new pipeline and access road from Wellpad

9 to Geodipa-owned proposed site for Dieng-2 power plant. According to IOL carried out in August

2019, the land belong to 6 AHs

ii) Land clearing of a 5.7 ha Geodipa-owned site (ex Mess PLN) which has been leased to a farmers

groups (23 persons) for vegetable cultivation.

Number of APs and losses may change following detailed engineering design during implementation stage

What is a Resettlement Plan ?

The Resettlement Plan (RP) is a planning document that describes impacts of land acquisition activities on

local peoples’ assets and livelihoods. It provides for adequate compensation for lost assets, and income restoration assistance for affected livelihoods. The Resettlement Plan was prepared in consultation with

APs and concerned groups. The RP is meant to ensure that affected people do not become worse off as a

result of the sub-project.

What are the key principles of resettlement under the Dieng 2 Sub Project?

The Dieng 2 project core principles for resettlement are to ensure that APs are not worse off from the project

and to provide an opportunity for the local population to derive benefits from it. The Dieng 2 Project

resettlement is based on the following principle

a. The sub-project will avoid or minimise impacts local people’s assets and livelihoods. b. Conduct meaningful consultations with APs, stakeholders, concerned NGOs, and community

groups either men or women to solicit their participation in land acquisition and involuntary

resettlement process and monitoring.

c. Inform APs on land acquisition and involuntary resettlement process, their entitlements, and

compensation and assistance options. Pay attention to the needs of vulnerable groups, especially

those below the poverty line, the landless, the elderly, women and children, and those without

legal title to land and ensure their participation in consultations;

d. Improve or at least restore the livelihood of the APs through (a) land-based income and livelihood

program; (b) replacement of assets with equal or higher value; (c) compensation at full

replacement cost for lost assets; and (d) additional assistance through benefit sharing where

possible;

e. Assist and compensate APs without title or any recognizable legal rights to land for non-land assets

at replacement cost.

f. There shall be effective mechanisms for hearing and resolving grievances during implementation

of the resettlement plan.

g. Negotiated land acquisition will follow procedure in a transparent, consistent, and equitable manner

principles and be confirmed trough written record and verified by an independent third party;

4

h. The Sub-project will not issue the notice to proceed for any construction works until full payment

has been fully disbursed to all APs and compensated APs have cleared the acquired land and

harvested their crops in a timely manner.

i. Monitor implementation of the resettlement planning and resettlement outcomes and impacts on

the standards of living of APs. Disclose the monitoring reports on the project’s website and make it

available on the project office

Who is responsible for resettlement activities and Project Implementation?

The PT Geo Dipa Board of Directors (BOD) Jakarta will be the executing agency (EA) who has overall

responsibility for coordination, policy directions, and administration of Geothermal Power Generation

Project (GPGP). The PMU has responsibility for day to day management and supervision of the GPGP,

and will be accountable for technical, safeguards, and financial reporting. Dieng Unit will be for the day-to-

day implementation and monitoring of safeguards plans, including implementation of the LRP

What it does mean by cut-off-date and when will be the cut of date ?

The cut-off date is the date prior to which the occupation or use of the project area make residents or users

of the same eligible to be categorized as AP / entitled party to receive compensation and other assistances.

The cut-off-date for acquired land will coincide with the Detail Measurement Survey that will be conducted

by GDE Land Acquisition Team . The cut off date for land clearing are set at 31 August 2019

What are the entitlements of APs in Dieng 2 Project

NO. TYPE OF LOSS ENTITILED PARTY / PERSON ENTITLEMENT

1. Loss of land, including agricultural and residential land

Those who have formal legal rights or those whose claims over the land is recognised as a full title, including people occupying State land in good faith.

▪ Cash compensation at replacement cost

▪ Any taxes and transactional cost borne by the project..

▪ Financial assistance for the renewal of the land ownership documents for the residual area of the entitled persons' land.

▪ Optional – compensation for residual land if no longer viable.

2. Loss of crops Owners regardless of land tenure status (with certificate of recognizable rights, informal dwellers, occupants)

▪ Annual crops: compensation will be paid based on prevailing market rates.

▪ Perennial crops: compensation at replacement cost taking into account crops’ productivity and age.

3. Loss of arable land for farming

People who have leased / occupied GDE land for farming.

▪ Cash compensation for loss of crops income equivalent to a minumum of one year of net product market value

▪ All cultivation activities end of February 2020, after compensation delivered

▪ APs are allowed to harvest prior to land clearing.

4. Temporary or permanent impacts due to construction.

For those who have formal legal rights or whose claim on land is recognized as a full right.

▪ Lease payments of the affected land by the contractor based on applicable rental fees and agreement with land owners.

5

NO. TYPE OF LOSS ENTITILED PARTY / PERSON ENTITLEMENT

▪ For productive land, rental fee will not be less than net income that would have been generated from the affected productive land.

▪ Compensation for non-land assets acquired (trees, plants, structures) permanently affected will be compensated at replacement cost.

▪ Land will be restored to pre-project conditions or better after construction has been completed.

Those who have no formal legal rights (certificate) or recognizable title (informal dwellers, croppers)

▪ Compensation for non-land assets (trees, crops, structures) at full replacement cost.

▪ No rental fee for the period of the impact.

▪ Land will be restored to pre-project conditions or better after construction has been completed.

Government or State enterprises / communal property and assets (e.g. schools, mosques, village office power poles, village road etc.)

▪ Rebuilding the facility or provide cash compensation based on the agreement with affected party(ies).

5. Loss of resource base (high risk of impoverishment)

Entitle party considered severely APs, i.e who loses 10% or more of the total assets or earning revenue sources;

• Entitle party consider vulnarable groups include 1) HH headed by woman, elderely or disable; 2) Poor HH; 3) Landless; 4) Ethnic minority;

• Lease coordinators

▪ Given the opportunity to get a job related with the sub-project.

▪ Participation in livelihood restoration program (LRP).

6. Unanticipated impacts or losses

Those who has lost land and non-land assets regardless formal legal rights to land

▪ Compensation for any damages to the properties, based on prevailing replacement cost.

▪ Provisions of mitigating measures shall be mitigated and documented based on project principles set forth in this RP

How is the Livelihood Restoration Program in the Sub-project?

Forms of livelihood assistance (to be delivered under ComDev program 2020-2022) are as follows :

a. Employment opportunities on sub-project related activities or Geodipa’s regular operations. b. Scholarships by considering the needs and the qualifications of the workforce for school going

age children.

c. Access to livelihood restoration activities (including small scale processed carica, keripik kentang

home industry, training on motor mechanics, welding, sewing and craft)

d. Provision of 12 new wells (2 wells per village) as response to potable water supply issues to

address clean water need.

e. Provision of periodic free health screening and follow-up medical services (from 2020 onwards).

f. Consolidation of waste (garbage) recycling, training and marketing of products for an existing

group.

LRP will be provided to : (a) Vulnerable and Severely affected households (AHs) ; and (b) Other

vulnerable households and/or persons who suffer construction impacts in 6 villages surrounding

project location (Karang Tengah, Kepakisan, Sikunang, Dieng Kulon, Bakal and Pranten

6

How to monitor the resettlement plan and implementation?

Internal Monitoring

Internal monitoring will be undertaken throughout the land acquisition and involuntary resettlement process.

The scope of monitoring includes: (i) Compensation payments to all APs, (ii) Delivery of livelihood

restoration program and social support, (iii). Public information dissemination and consultations, (iv).

Grievance resolution of outstanding issues requiring management’s attention, (v). The benefit provided from the project, (vi). Ability of AH’s to re-establish their livelihoods and living standards, (vii) Resettlement

outcomes.

External Monitoring

An independent monitoring agency will be engaged by PMU to carry out land acquisition and resettlement

external monitoring and post- implementation evaluation.

What is the tentative schedule for RP and its implementation?

No. STEPS TIMELINE

A. PLANNING STAGE

1. Social Impact Assessment and Stakeholder Consultation Mar, May, Aug. Sept. 2019

2. ADB Review and Approval of RP Oct. – Nov. 2019

3. Disclosure of RP on ADB website Nov. 2019

B IMPLEMENTATION STAGE

Land Clearing

4. Verification of land users data and negotiation Dec 2019-Jan 2020

5. Compensation payment to affected land users Jan-Feb 2020

6. Affected land users vacate Geodipa-owned land End February 2020

Land Acquisition

7. Further consultation and verification of land ownership March – April 2020

8. Negotiations to get agreement on amount of compensation June 2020

9. Measurement of sub-project boundary by BPN. July – Aug 2020

10. Update RP document and submit to ADB April-June 2020

11. ADB Review and Approval of updated RP July – Aug. 2020

12. Disclosure of updated RP Sept.2020

13. Compensation payment to affected land owners Sept.- October 2020

14. Implementation of Livelihood Restoration Plan (LRP) From 2020 onwards in parallel with construction works.

MONITORING & EVALUATION

15. Internal monitoring periodic

16. External monitoring March 2021 and Sept. 2023

How are the grievances of APs heard and resolved?

7

i) Level 1 – Site Office through the designated contact person (i.e. PR staff). Complaint to be

resolved at the Site Office level (i.e., environment safeguard staff or social safeguard staff , PMC,

Contractor) within five working days and advise the Complainant accordingly.

ii) Level 2 – GRC. When a complaint is not resolved at Level 1, Complainant can submit the complaint

to the GRC. The GRC will convene, review the submission and make a decision within 30 days

from the date of receipt. The Complainant will be informed of the decision in person or by mail. The

Complainant shall be consulted by the GRC when identifying grievance redress options. The GRC

may collaborate with relevant agencies (i.e district land office and TP4P/TP4D for land acquisition

and involuntary resettlement, District agency of environment) to resolve the complaint.

iii) Third level – Appropriate Courts of Law. When the complaint remains unresolved, the

Complainant will be referred by the GRC to the appropriate courts of law.

Who should be contacted for any inquiries about the Project?

PT. Geo Dipa Energi Jakarta :

Aldevco Octagon 2nd Floor

Jl. Warung Jati Barat No. 75

Jakarta Selatan 12740 - Indonesia

T. +62 21 7982925

F. +62 21 7982930

What division??

Dieng Unit

1

LIVELIHOOD RESTORATION ASSESSMENT per 13 October 2019

A. Context, Objective and Methodology

1. Context of the Assessment

This assessment is being done in the context of the proposed Dieng-2 Geothermal Expansion sub-project

(to be financed under an ADB loan). The sub-project is located in the highlands of the Province of Central

Java.

GOI regulations and the ABD SPS 2009 require income restoration to be addressed for people affected by

project activities, in this case land acquisition and project implementation activities.

GOI provides that affected people receive adequate compensation determined by independent

appraisers.

ADB SPS further requires affected people should not become worse off, and that severely

affected people and vulnerable people be provided with livelihood restoration and special

assistance.

People who will be affected by land acquisition and land clearing activities for the Dieng-2 Sub-project are

residents of Desa Karang Tengah (village), Kecamatan Batur, Kabupaten Banjarnegara in the Province of

Jawa Tengah (Central Java).

Land owners and land users (tenant farmers, cropper) will be entitled to compensation for lost assets

(land, structures, crops) based on replacement costs (appraised by and independent appraiser – KJKK), as

well as income or livelihood restoration assistance for economic losses (due to loss of access to productive

land).

However, it needs to be taken into account that this exercise is being conducted against a backdrop of

very specific socio-economic conditions in the Dieng area. Farmers are exposed to continuous risk of

impoverishment due to the very competitive and speculative nature of their main source of income -

potato farming (which includes high levels of borrowing to cover production costs), diminishing

productivity and profits over the last 20-30 years, increasing reliance on chemical fertilizers and pesticides

to cope with declining fertility resulting in very pronounced socio-economic dynamics of accumulation

and dispossession as well as soil, ecological, and environmental degradation (including over-extraction of

surface and ground water for farming) . (Source of information - Santoso, H. 2019)

Secondly, there are a number of factors and socio-political issues below the surface contributing to a less

than optimal disposition of local communities towards GDE. (This matter was addressed by the Social

Mapping and Engineering Report, 2018.) Field observations by the SES Consultant, Mr. R.Y. Zakaria

(anthropologist) provides a greater in-depth assessment of local politics in the case of Karang Tengah

2

Village, where nearly all of the households - who will be potentially affected by land acquisition and

clearing - reside. There is competitition among three factions to maximize/extract gains from the presence

of GDE in their midst.

Apart from local resource base and market opportunities, the two above analyses have the most bearing

on livelihood restoration strategy and options.

2. Objective

The purpose of this assessment is to formulate a Livelihood Restoration Assistance package to be

implemented under PT Geodipa’s Community Development (ComDev) program targeted at the following

affected households who will be severely affected by loss of land / loss of access to productive land

(economic loss) :

1. Six land owners who will lose some land to land acquisition for a corridor of land (400 m x 10 m)

connecting Wellpad 9 to the proposed Dieng-2 Power Plant site (locally known as Mess PLN).

2. 23 tenant farmers belonging to the Kelompok Sadar Alam dan Tani Merdada Sejahtera which is

currently leasing approximately 4 ha of the Mess PLN site for the purpose of potato and vegetable

cultivation.1

3. Approach / Methodology

The methodology applied by this assessment is as follows:

Literature review (see References section).

Review :

i) Contextual information about the Dieng area in general, local communities in the Dieng

Geothermal Complex area and local politics in Karang Tengah Village

ii) Taking stock of results of current studies concerning livelihoods and current interventions

in the Dieng area.

iii) Review of what local people say about alternative livelihood opportunities, with focus on

Karang Tengah Village.

Assessment / identification of short term livelihood restoration interventions which informed

identification or selection of Livelihood Restoration measures for 28 affected households plus

vulnerable households in 6 villages2.

Assessment / identification of options for longer term interventions (investments) aimed at (i)

eo ie ti g Geodipa’s Pu li Relatio s a d Co u it E gage e t 3 (ComDev) strategy and

program, thus (ii) improving relations between Geodipa and local communities. It is envisaged

that the above reorientation (transformation) will be informed by (a) formulation of a Road Map

1 There is an overlap between the two categories – one of the land owners is also a tenant farmer at the mess PLN

site (Sugito).

2 specified by GDE.

3 consistent with recommendations in the Social Mapping & Social Engineering Report by PT Miranthi Konsultan

Permai in collaboration with Geo Dipa Energi, 2018.

3

for (building a) Development Partnership between Geodipa and local communities and (b)

improved methods to identify and strengthen livelihood security solutions and mutually beneficial

initiatives.

B. Review

1. Introduction

The Dieng Plateau straddles three Kabupaten (Banjarnegara, Batang, and Wonosobo). There are 10

villages in the Dieng Geothermal Working Area (WKP Panas Bumi Dieng). These are:

Table 1: List of Villages in the Dieng Geothermal Work Area

KABUPATEN KECAMATAN DESA (VILLAGE)

Banjarnegara Batur Bakal

Dieng Kulon

Karang Tengah

Kepakisan

Pekasiran

Batang Bawang Pranten

Wonosobo Kejajar Dieng

Jojogan

Sikunang

Land acquisition and economic displacement impacts of the Dieng-2 expansion sub-project will be

experienced by 28 households in Karang Tengah Village.

2. Some Contextual Information

General Economic Profile of Kabupaten Banjarnegara and Wonosobo

In general, the livelihoods of communities in the the Dieng area are dominated by the agricultural sector;

especially seasonal crops at an altitude of more than 1,500 meters above sea level. Agricultural crop

commodities cultivated by farmers are dominated by potato, because at these heights the potato plant

yields quite high production compared to lower altitudes. And at an altitude of less than 1,500 meters

above sea level the commodities cultivated by farmers are still quite diverse such as leeks, carrots, chillies,

potatoes and several other seasonal crops. In addition there is also a commodity crop plantation, namely

tobacco.

The most famous agricultural product in Dieng is the potato. Dieng is largest potato producing area in

Indonesia. The superior quality of Dieng potatoes is acknowledged in other provinces. Potato farming in

the Dieng region experienced a boom in the 1980s which carried on till the 2000s. At that time there was

4

a change extraordinary economy because the potato crop can produce multiple crops with not too much

capital, it will eventually also bring changes in the behaviour and views of the Dieng farming community

towards various things, instant habits and lack of awareness to preserve the environment at large. Based

on Statistic data, harvested area of potatoes in Kabupaten Wonosobo is 3,467 (Ha) in 2017 and 3,511

(Ha) in 2018. Generally, the horticulture sub sector includes vegetable and fruit plants. Highest crop

productivity vegetables are dominated by plants chayote for 3 877,62 (quintal/ ha) in 2018, the fruits has

the biggest production is salak, banana and durian. In the case of Kabupaten Banjarnegara, potato crop

productivity is the highest vegetable crop i.e 1,185,797 quintal in 2017 which decreased by 3.3% to

1,147,193 quintal in 2018.

Economic and investment potential and opportunity in the Dieng area is huge, considering that in the field

of tourism a lot can be developed such as hospitality and restaurant services as well as the small and

medium scale enterprises.

On the other hand, Wonosobo is also famous for its agricultural and plantation products. Starting from

the tea plantations that developed into Tambi Agro Tourism, Wonosobo Arabica coffee and various

vegetables, fruits, spices and other horticultural products. From year to year production for domestic and

foreign markets always increases.

Wonosobo not only produces agricultural and plantation products, its processing industry are also

developed together with work partners from both the private sector and the Wonosobo community itself.

As a result, there are many processing facilities and small and medium industries based on agriculture and

plantation produce.

Special and different from among others, the development of Carica fruit (a type of papaya typical of the

mountains) in the world only grows in 3 places; Indonesia (Dieng Mountains), Russia, and Argentina as

well as the development of Purwaceng plants (herb) for health drinks and Javanese herbal medicine. In

the field of forestry, animal husbandry, and fisheries also do not escape the attention of local governments

Dieng community economic growth in Kabupaten Wonosobo and Kabupaten Banjarnegara is shown by

the growth rate of gross ratio domestic product / GRDP. The growth rate of Kabupaten Wonosobo was

4.94 % in 2019, an increase compared to the previous year (2017) which was 3.88 % . The growth rate of

Kabupaten Banjarnegara was 5.67 % for 2017 was higher than the previous year (2016) which was 5.65

%. This increase in GRDP was triggered by an increase in the growth of the agricultural sector both food

crops, horticulture and fisheries. Kabupaten Wonoso o a d Ba ja ega a’s GRDP is dominated by

agriculture, forestry and fisheries businesses, the following table is 2019 GRDP according to type of

business:

Table 2: Types of Businesses in Kabupaten Wonosobo and Banjarnegara (2019)

Business Kabupaten

Wonosobo ( % )

Kabupaten

Banjarnegara ( % )

Agriculture, forestry and Fisheries 30.43 29.53

Processing Industry 17.40 15.06

5

Business Kabupaten

Wonosobo ( % )

Kabupaten

Banjarnegara ( % )

Big trade, retail , Car and Motor cycle workshop 16.84 14.97

Construction 6.77 -

Education Service 6.54 -

Others 40.44

The Dieng Area - The Potato Boom of the 1980s-90s and the Dynamics of Accumulation and

Dispossession

Based on a presentation by Dr. Hery Santoso on 14 August 2019, organized by the SES Consultant as part

of the IOL-SES briefing for GDE Unit Dieng staff, the IOL team, the SES team as well as the Social Safeguards

consultant, the livelihood issues faced by farmers4 in the Dieng area are very specific to the area. The

scenario is one of a boom crop in a fragile highland eco-system. Potato cultivation boomed in the 1980s

and 1990s in Dieng due to a nexus of external factors (fast food culture and the demand for potato imports

in the West), and conducive agro-economic conditions in Dieng at the time. Dr. Santoso studies map out

the rise and fall (inevitable collapse) of the potato industry in Dieng with a focus on socio-economic

i pa ts o Die g eside ts. The ai fi di gs of D . “a toso’s analysis are that (i) there is a dynamic of

systemic impoverishment happening which is causing a process of accumulation by a few farmers and the

dispossession of weaker farmers. Farmers become trapped into extensification and intensification of their

potato crops due to debt. Weaker / less competitive farmers are being squeezed out of their farms (due

to default on debts) and forced to rely more on selling farm labour, or migrating out of the Dieng area to

the less agriculturally profitable lowland areas. (ii) Capital, land and labour have become commodified.

The above scenario sustains the financial and agro-chemical industry in the area. In conclusion, any

development intervention into the area should adopt a structural approach to addressing the above

issues. The Dieng area is in need of transformation in order to support (promote and sustain) livelihood

strategies that are able to restore the degraded environment and eco-systems. (See references for other

papers by Dr. H. Santoso.)

Results of Social Mapping Exercise in 10 villages in the Dieng Geothermal Complex area

Focusing down to ten villages in the immediate vicinity of the Dieng Geothermal Power Generation

Complex, a social mapping analysis conducted in 2018 by PT Miranthi Konsultan Permai highlights the

issue of local community 5 dissatisfaction or resistance to the prese e of Geodipa in four6 out of 10

villages in their study area. The study identifies and discusses some of the sources of dissatisfaction and

resistance largel att i uted to a ide ts at Wellpads a d , dete io atio of ualit of the illages’ fresh water supply as well as diminishing water supply, and concern regarding a pond for waste water and

possible landslides.

4 who are all engaged in potato farming as their main cash crop.

5 12 villages in the Dieng geothermal work area.

6 Karang Tengah, Kepakisan, Sikunang and Pranten.

6

Impacts of Dieng-2 sub-project impacts within the above context and local politics

Further focusing down to the village of Karang Tengah where nearly all land acquisition and economic

impacts will be experienced by 28 households, field notes taken by the SES consultant describes the socio-

political networks in Karang Tengah Village (3 opposing spheres of influence), and discusses shortcomings

i GDE’s o e all app oa h to lo al o u ities hi h is at the sou e of the dissatisfa tio a d esista e described in the above-mentioned Social Mapping report.

An extract of the SES Consultant’s 7 assessment of field conditions and potential economic impact of Dieng

Project 2 development on the local community:

i) While the number of people affected is relatively small 8, qualitatively impacts could become much

more significant depending on how these impacts influence local politics - given the tenuous

situation described above, competititon among three spheres of local political influence in trying to

se u e t a sa tio al e efits f o GDE, a d the elo opti al state of GDE’s elatio s ith the local communities.

ii) The local situation makes things worse. In implementing the Dieng-2 sub-project, the following

social problems need to be taken into account:

a. The economic system is based on free competition between actors which results in

fluctuating commodity prices and which leads to a process dispossession (separation of

farmers from factors of production due to debt defaults) which then accumulates in the

control of a few people, and out-migration in large numbers.

b. Growth of the formal sector (financial market dominated by the private sector, chemical

fertilizer and pesticides industry) is sustained by the informal sector (agriculture) which

receives minimal State support (irrigation of crops and transportation are all based on

self-help).

c. GDE’s lo level of labour absorption from local communities.

d. GDE is considered as (foreign) and the bringer of accidents (well blowout and impacts)

and related natural problems (eg. decline in water availability and quality) which has

created a transactional and exploitative attitude towards GDE (or the Project) in order to

extract benefits.

(These issues are discussed in greater depth in the Final Report of the SES Consultant, September 2019.)

3. Review of Current Interventions

PT Geodipa has a CSR Framework and on-going Community Development program. (See Annex 1.)

There are also a number of sources of information concerning livelihoods and livelihood issues faced by

communities surrounding the Dieng Geothermal facility. These include:

7 R.Y. Zakaria (anthropologist)

8 28 households, 103 people.

7

Social Mapping and Social Engineering Report by PT Miranthi Konsultan Permai in association with

Geo Dipa Energi, 2018. (See Annex 2 for a brief.)

ADB, Geothermal Power Generation Project – Records of Initial Consultation with Affected

Persons, Communities, and Stakeholders, 18-26 March: 2019. (See Annex 3 for a brief.)

ADB, Geothermal Power Generation Project – Gender Analysis (inc. Gender Action Plan), 2019.

(See Annex 4 for a brief.)

4. What local people say

Results of In-Depth Interviews with seven successful local entrepreneurs

In-depth interviews concerning experience with various successful economic activities apart from farming

were conducted with seven key informants.

Table 3: List of Key Informants

No. NAME DESCRIPTION LOCATION

1. Alif Fauzi Informal leader, Leader of local Tourism

Aware Group, tourism practitioner.

Dieng Kulon

2. Iyul Carica home industry entrepreneur Karang Tengah

3. Zainal Informal village leader, Ex-Head of Village

Senate, Geodipa vendor

Karang Tengah

4. Nasrullah Informal village leader, ex-Village Head of

Karang Tengah, Main coordinator of 24

tenant farmers who have leased Geodipa

land for farming.

Karang Tengah

5. Herman Local entrepreneur - homestay owner /

manager and petrol pump owner.

Dieng Kulon

6. Puji Astuti Local entrepreneur – local snacks (UD Tri

Sakti) and homestay manager

Dieng Kulon

7. Budi Local leader / spokesman for 6 land

owners affected by land acquisition.

Karang Tengah

The main points raised were:

1. Type of Enterprise

a) Type of enterprise to be developed depends on the potential and opportunities for

development. Opportunities for enterprise development in Dieng are more open because

Dieng is already a tourist destination.

8

b) Carica (local fruit crop) is in abundant supply in Dieng and constitutes a very good potential

for further development of home industries.

c) Entrepreneurs have to develop their business for at least 3 years before they can experience

the benefits.

2. Capital

a) In and around the Dieng area, investment capital is usually obtained from personal savings,

or loans from BRI and BPR Surya Yuda. Land certificates may be used as collateral. In case

borrowers do not have land certificates, a land ownership document called SPPT may be

used to secure loans of up to Rp. 50 million.

b) Capital requirements for various micro-small enterprises range from Rp. 100,000 to tens of

million. In the case of carica processing, home industries require a capital investment of

between Rp. 100,000 – Rp. 3 million.

c) The capital required is not only cash. Skills are required. Skills for starting-up and developing

small scale enterprises may be obtained from training and partnering with the Local

Tourism Development Agency (Dinas Pariwisata).

3. Markets

a) Most of the production of processed carica products are marketed in the Dieng tourism

area. The current model used is to consign products to local vendors / shops / warung (food

stalls). Once of the resource persons interviewed has established her own shop and food

counter for selling locally processed produce (oleh-oleh). Some are able to sell their

products via social media such as FaceBook.

b) Processed carica products are also sold in Wonosobo town and have reached (penetrated)

other provincial markets.

c) Local homestay operators advertise through travel websites (such as Traveloka), through

social media and also collaborate with local travel bureaus.

4. Perspective on developing alternative livelihood activities in the case of Karang Tengah Village

a) Karang Tengah Village has characteristics similar to Dieng Kulon Village which has been

successfully pioneered as a tourism destination. Challenges and obstacles that are faced are

similar to when Dieng Kulon started to develop as a tourist village.

b) The Telaga Merdada Lake has potential do be developed as a tourist destination (obyek).

However, the area needs to be properly managed spatially because it is currently full of

water pumps delivering water to potato crops in the area.

c) Collaboration with Geodipa to develop educational tourism (introduction to the geothermal

energy and extraction industry). Development of such potential will surely open up new

opportunities for local people - car park fees, souvenir shops, food stalls (warung), as well

as for the sale of local processed food products.

Results of Focus Group Discussions (FGD) with affected people

Four FGDs were conducted with affected people over 21-23 August 2019. 80% of those invited attended:

9

The first FGD was with the Village Youth Group (Karang Taruna) and some village members (28

participants.

The second FGD was with wives of affected households (21 participants).

The third FGD was with 20 out of 24 tenant farmers and 4 coordinators (24 participants)

The fourth FGD was with land owners (4 out of six attended)

The main inputs from affected people regarding livelihood restoration were:

i) Tenant farmers and wives have no objection that the land that they have been cultivating based on

an annual lease system will be used for sub-project development. However they hope to receive

compensation in an amount at lease equal to the amount they spent on land preparation in the first

instance of utilization. They also requested to be allowed to continue renting land at the site until

at least August so that the a e jo panen raya ig ha est efo e a ati g the site.

ii) Land owners who attended the FGD were not able to give a clear indication that they were willing

to sell the land to GDE. However, the matter of being given the privilege for any of their children to

be employed by GDE at a later date was discussed.

iii) Participants of the first FGD highlighted the issue of hiring of human resources at GDE. They felt that

the recruitment and selection system was not transparent. Most of GDE staff is dominated by

people from outside the area. They requested greater openness and transparency in the

recruitment and selection process of future workers. They also requested suitable training for local

youth in the required skills. Other training (and equipment) that this group requested was for

welding, making of handicrafts/souvenirs for the tourist market and sewing. There were requests

for supporting home industries in carica and potato chips (production and marketing), and

neighbourhood-based cultural groups.

iv) Both affected heads of households and their wives were not willing to leave their zones of comfort

and security. They are farmers who are typically risk averse. Although potato harvest fail from time

to time, they are not confident to attempt new livelihood strategies / activities. According to to

Santoso, they are farmers who are trapped by debt. The o e ’s FGD opi ed that the ould rather work as farm labourers than attempt new activities with new risks that there were not

familiar with.

v) The prospect of developing the nearby Telaga Merdada (lake) as a tourism attraction was raised.

However most farmers rejected the proposal because the lake is a source of irrigation water during

the dry season. The local potato harvest at that time enjoys premium price as many other locations

where water is not readily available, are not able to plant a crop.

vi) There is a strong indication that compensation monies paid to tenant farmers will be re-invested in

renting alternative land to continue potato farming.

10

C. Assessment

Annex 5 presents an assessment based on the following methodology:

Usi g PT Geodipa’s C“R f a e o k:

1. Relevant information for a number of sources / available documents including consultations with

communities surrounding the Dieng Geothermal facilities9 was compiled.

2. The fit between livelihood related assista e a aila le u de Geodipa’s C“R f a e o k a d lo al communities’ issues a d a ti ulated eeds as a al sed.

3. Based on in-depth interviews and consultations with the affected people, activities were

ide tified hi h ould e p o ided u de GDE’s C“R p og am under a ComDev Khusus category.

Since there are only 30 affeced households, access to these activities will be opened up to

vulnerable households in Karang Tengah as well as 5 other villages specified by GDE.10

4. Based on assessments by Zakaria, RY and in light of the problematique discussed by Santoso, H.,

recommendations will be made for an overall re-orientation of GDE CSR strategy. Strategic

activities for establishing a good foundation for planning more responsive development

interventions and better leveraging of existing funding structures in the future are recommended 11.

1. Livelihood Assistance Packages

Annex 5 presents the intermediate assessment matrix. With due efe e e to Geodipa’s CSR pillars, and

program activities over 2018-2019, the assessment collates documented livelihood issues and needs,

reassesses recommendations, to filter the most strategic (responsive) and immediate interventions (1-3

years) for the target group (viz 28 households potentially affected by land acquisition and land clearing

activities for Dieng-2 expansion).

Livelihood restoration options mostly fall under the Geodipa Pintar (community empowering) pillar.

Based on the intermediate assessment in Annex 5, and further filtered against the results of in-depth

interviews and most importantly, FGD results with the affected people themselves, the following income

restoration assistance or activities and strategy are proposed for affected households losing land, and

losing access to rented productive land.

9 power plant, sub-station, wellpads, pipelines, inspection roads, access roads.

10 Dieng Kulon, Bakal, Kepakisan, Sikunang and Pranten.

11 The “E“ Co sulta t’s Fi al Repo t ill also contain recommendations for how Geodipa could reorientate its

approach to local communities, change its image, and reposition itself as a development partner and driver for

development of the Dieng area as a whole.

11

Table 4: Type of Livelihood Assistance & Strategy to reduce disruption to income flow

Type of Affected

Household /

members

Type of Assistance Provided Strategy

Heads of land owning

households

Negotiated compensation (based on independent

RCS 12).

Release of ownership of land to GDE

expected by Aug. 2020. Land owners

have sufficient time between now

and then to identify suitable

replacement land to purchase or rent.

Able to resume full production

without significant transition period.

Heads of tenant

farmer households

Compensation (santunan) based on independent

RCS) with reference to Presidential Decree 62/2018

– sufficient to cover a waiting period of up to 1 year.

A. Assistance with identification (mapping)

and securing of alternative productive land to lease

as early as possible after vacating the mess PLN

site.

Current land lease (of Mess PLN site)

will be renewed until Aug. 2020 to

enable farmers to panen raya (big

harvest) so that they have surplus +

santunan / compensation amount to

apply for renting alternative land.

Between now and then, tenant

farmers have sufficient window of

time to identify suitable alternative

land to rent.

Resume economic production on new

land without significant transition

period.

▪ Affected Heads

of Households

▪ Wives of all

affected

households

▪ Young working

member of

affected

households

B. Priority will be given to members of affected

households to access un-skilled labour work or

suitable job openings at GDE Unit Dieng for which

they may be qualified. Where necessary, youth will

be trained in skills consistent with future HR needs

so that they may be equipped and eligible for

employment in the future. The ComDev program

will also initiate efforts to prepare more people

from local communities for employment at the GDE

Dieng Unit facility.

1. Priority for un-skilled work over 2020 – 2022.

2. Priority for suitable job vacancies from 2020

onwards.

Identification and training for potential youth in

skills required for operational stage of Dieng-2 and

Dieng-3 (2023 onwards).

C. Scholarships and living allowance for students

of AHs.

Targeting of the family unit

(husbands, wives or family members

given priority to access LR packages if

suitable).

3 year assistance package –

Foundation, Development, Growth.

Implementation supported by

facilitation NGO.

Coordinated and establish synergy

with support provided by Kabupaten

Agencies interventions.

12 RCS – Replacement Cost Study conducted by independent appraisers.

12

Type of Affected

Household /

members

Type of Assistance Provided Strategy

▪ Other vulnerable

households in 6

villages (specified

by GDE Corsec)

and/or

households

affected by

unanticipated

impacts during

construction.

D. Priority access to livelihood restoration

activities if desired and according to preference:

1. Carica processing and marketing (inc. value

chain analysis and development)

2. Potato chips, cassava chips, yam chips etc.

processing and marketing (inc. value chain

analysis and development).

3. Training (and provision of equipment) in

vocational skills - (a) mechanic and (b) welding.

2. Long Term Re-orientation of ComDev Program

The proposed approach for generating benefits for local communities under the Project is as follows:

i) Expand the Livelihood Restoration activities to also reach other community members (See the

last column of Table 9-1). This is to promote a perception of fairness among on-lookers.

ii) Program specific activities that were clearly raised during the September round of community

consultations. This will include:

a. Provision of 12 new wells (2 wells per village) as an immediate response to potable water

supply issues (to be implemented in 2020).

b. Participatory design and rehabilitation of water supply infrastructure. This will be done

over a 2 year time-frame (2020 – 2021).

c. Provision of periodic free health screening and follow-up medical services (from 2020

onwards), and

d. Consolidation of waste (garbage) recycling, training and marketing of products for an

existing group in Sikunang Villages (2020).

iii) Reo ie tatio of GDE’s Co De st ateg a d P og a ia i stitutio al st e gthe i g of Village Governments. Increase critical awarenss of village governents and village level activists regarding

livelihood security and ecological degradation issues, and to empower village governments to be

able to undertake strategic planning, and to feed outputs into the annual government

development planning process (Musrenbangdes as ell as a k to i fo GDE’s Co De programming.

iv) Implementation of new livelihood security solutions based on (iii).

The rationale for the urgent eed to eo ie t GDE’s Co De st ateg a d p og a a d i deed GDE’s

o e all app oa h to the lo al Die g o u it is dis ussed i depth i the “E“ Co sulta t’s - SES

Completion Report.

The main activity identified for reorienting the ComDev Program to become more strategic (and less

philanthropic) is strengthening of local Village Government in development planning and budgeting by

13

developing a geo-social-spatial information system13 . The instrument developed for this is based on GOI

Law no. 6 / 2014 concerning Villages, and Minister of Villages, Development of Isolated Villages, and

Transmigration No. 16/2018 concerning priority for utilization of Dana Desa funds for 2019.

Strengthening of the bottom-up/participatory planning process is meant to create greater critical local

awareness of the inevitable declining state of the potato industry, diminishing carrying capacity of the

fragile highland eco-system, the process of accumulation and dispossession, in order to advocate

structural changes, and propose more strategic development interventions that will help transform local

livelihood strategies into more sustainable ones that are able to sustain levels of welfare and also

rehabilitate or at least stabilize degraded eco-systems.

The on-the-job training process for this exercise will take 4 months per village. It will be conducted by

specialist NGO services who have developed the geo-social-spatial methodology and have experience

conducting the necessary training at village-level.

The output of the exercise will be a web-based Village geo-social-spatial system (with dashboard)

established and able to be managed by the trained village cadre, a publication which Village Governments

may use to communicate with Kabupaten, Provincial Government, development partners and other

stakeholders. If the activity in each village may be successfully completed before August 2020, the outputs

may feed into the annual Government development planning and budgeting process (Musrenbangdes),

update RPJMDes14, prepare RKP15, as well as inform GDE ComDev annual programming. New and more

strategic and responsive activities emerging out of this process will enable better coordination of

development budgeting under Dana Desa / APBDes (Village Development Funds), and ComDev program

budgeting. If the process cannot be completed before August 2020, then outputs may feed into the 2021

planning and budgeting cycle.

Proposals that emerge from this process that are directed towards the ComDev program may be

accommodated as part of the reorientation of ComDev strategy and approach towards more responsive,

strategic and empowering assistance to local communities. These activities may be budged for under the

ComDev programs for 2021 or 2022 onwards.

D. Estimated Budget

Table 5 (next page) provides the estimated budget for the Livelihood Restoration and Reoriented ComDev

Program to be financed under the Dieng-2 expansion sub-project. The total estimated budget is

approximately IDR 17.464 billion (US$ 1,229.831).

13 SID – Sistem Informasi Desa (Village Information System). 14 RPJMDes – Rencana Pembangunan Jangka Menengah Desa (Medium Term Village Development Plan) 15 RKP – Rencana Kerja Pembangunan (Annual Development Work Plans)

14

Table 5: Cost Estimates for Livelihood Restoration/Enhancement & new ComDev Activities under the Dieng-2 expansion sub-project.

No. Category / Activity Target Location 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 TOTAL

(Rp. million)

A. Adjust HR strategy to create more opportunities for hiring local people (and to create better buy-in from the community)

1 Priority to members of affected households for suitable job vacancies (2020 onwards) for which they qualify.

24 AHs for 3 year period.

Karang Tengah

4 coordinators Karang Tengah

30 HHs each from 6 villages/year

6 villages *

2 Identification, scholarships and training for potential youth in skills and higher education required for operational stage of Dieng-2 and Dieng-3 (2020 onwards).

24 children from AHs for 5 years

Karang Tengah

240 240 240 240 240 1,200

30 children for 5 years

6 villages * 300 300 300 300 300 1500

B. Livelihood Restoration & Ennhancement

3 Carica processing and marketing a) AHs 2 groups (12-14

women) Karang Tengah

640 14 654

b) Project Benefits 42 women 6 villages * 245 497 759 21 1,522

4 Food produce processing and

marketing

a) AHs 3 groups (18 women) Karang Tengah

640 18 654

b) Project Benefits 54 women 6 villages * 640 658 658 18 1,974

5 Vocational training and equipment

a) AHs 24 youth Karang Tengah

424 24 448

15

b) Project Benefits 60 youth 6 villages * 884 66

950

C. Community Development (Regular)

6 Digging / construction of 12 wells 2 wells / village 6 villages* 1,800 1,800

7 Free medical screening and

follow-up 100 people 6 villages * 350 350 350 350 350 1,750

8 Consolidation of waste (garbage)

recycling (training, marketting) 6 groups 6 villages * 300 300

D. ComDev Strategy & Program Reorientation

9 Specialist NGO Services for introducing geo-sosial-spatial planning system to Village Governments **

60 Village Cadres (Village Govt., LKMD,

BUMDes**) and 6 village communities

6 villages 1,667 720 737 3,124

Total 7,246 3705 3110 929 890 15,876

Contingencies (10%) 724.6 370.50 311 92.9 89 1,587.60

Grand Total (Rp. Million) 7,970.6 4,075.5 3,421.0 1,021.9 979.0 17,463.6

US$ 561,309.9 287,007.0 240,915.50 71,964.8 68,943.7 1,229,831.0

Note: * 6 villages - Karang Tengah, Kepakisan, Dieng Kulon, Bakal, Pranten and Sikunang

** LKMD (Lembaga Ketahanan Masyarakat Desa - Village Community Security Institution), BUMDes (Badan Usaha Milik Desa - Village Corporation)

** Strategic livelihood security improvement activities identified by this process (from 2020 onwards, on an annual basis) will be proposed for financing by Dana Desa / APBDes (Village Development Allocations) as well as annual GDE ComDev budgets. (Will include water supply system rehabilitation for 6 villages.)

16

E. Implementation Schedule

The implementation schedule for the livelihood restoration / enhancement and ComDev reorientation

activities and new livelihood security solutions (to be financed under the Dieng-2 sub-project) is

presented in Table 6.

Table 6: Implementation Schedule for Livelihood Restoration / Enhancement and ComDev Program

Reorientation and Activities

No. Step / Activitiy

Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4

1 Finalise LRA and ComDev packages

2 Prepare budget for LRP activities

3 Social preparation (identification / formation

of target groups)

4 Implementation of LRP

4.1 Training

4.2 Delivery of equipment / inputs

4.3 Access to finance (if necessary)

5 Implementation of Livelihood Restoration and

Enhancement activities (Development and

Growth) for 30 AHs and 110 vulnerable HHs in

6 villages

6 Procure services of SID++ specialst consultant

/ NGO services

7 Implementation of ComDev activities

7.1 Digging and construction of wells (12

wells, 6 villages)

7.2 Survey and Design of water supply

rehabiltation for 6 villages

7.3 Rehabilitation of water supply for 6

villages

7.4 Consolidation of waste (garbage) recycling

activities (training, marketing) for 1 group

(Sikunang)

8 Provision of free health screening and follow-

up service (100 households)

9 Conduct SIDD++ (plus annual follow-up)

10 Planning and budgeting of annual

development activities for APBDes and GDE

ComDev.

11 Implementation of new livelihood security

solutions (generated by SID++) under the

Community Development Program

12 12.1 LRP / ComDev monitoring, evaluation

and reporting (inc. outcomes)

12.2 Corrective action

2019 2020 2021 2022 2023

17

References

[1] ADB (2019). Geothermal Power Generation Project – Gender Analysis, ADB.

[2] ADB (2019). - Consultation Report. Geothermal Power Generation Project - Initial Consultation with

Affected Persons, Communities, and Stakeholders, 18-26 March: 2019

[3] Badan Pusat Statistik Kabupaten Banjarnegara (Agustus 2019). Kabupaten Banjarnegara dalam

Angka 2019.

[4] Badan Pusat Statistik Kabupaten Wonosobo (Agustus 2019). Kabupaten Wonosobo dalam Angka

2019.

[5] Badan Pusat Statistik Kabupaten Wonosobo (2018). Indikator Kesejahteraan Rakyat Kabupaten

Wonosobo 2017.

[6] Kartika, Desta Leila (2019) Bank Indonesia Dukung Pengembangan Wisata di Dieng.

TribunJateng.com, Semarang (3 March 2019)

[7] Liputan6.com, Jakarta. Article about Dieng.

[8] Muzaki, Khoirul (2019). Geliat Homestay di Dieng. Petani pun nyambi jadi pengusaha penginapan.

https://jateng.tribunnews.com/2019/07/19/

[9] PT Miranthi Konsultan Permai & Geo Dipa Energi (2018). Laporan Akhir Social Mapping dan Social

Engineering di Wilayah Kerja Panas Bumi Dieng

[10] PT Geo Dipa Energi. List of CSR Activities for FY 2018 and 2019.

[11] Puspita, Indira (2005). Zonasi Kondisi Kawasan Hutan Negara di Dieng dan Arahan Pengelolaan

yang Berwawasan Lingkungan. Jurusan Perencanaan Wilayah dan Kota. Fakultas Teknik Universitas

Diponegoro, Semarang

[12] Santoso, Hery (2019). (Power Point Presentation) Dieng – Perubahan Ekologi, Proses Produksi dan

Identitas.

[13] Santoso, Hery (undated). Kejayaan dan Ketersingkiran. Proses Diferensiasi di Kalangan Petani

Kentang di Dataran Tinggi Dieng.

[14] Santoso, Hery (undatedt). Pembentukan Relasi Kapitalis dalam Proses Produksi Kentang di Dieng.

[15] Umanailo, M. Chairul Basrun, M.Si (Desember 2016). Marginaslisasi Buruh Tani Akibat Asih Fungsi

Lahan. FAM Publishing. ISBN 978-602-335-215-9

[16] www.diengplateau.com. Pertanian di Dieng.

[17] Zakaria, R. Y. (August 2019). Catatan RYZ untuk perancangan program Livelihood Restoration dan

CSR dalam konteks Proyek Pengembangan Dieng-2, PT Geo Dipa Energi.

[18] Zakaria, R.Y. (September 2019). Final SES Completion Report for preparation of the Dieng-2 sub-

project Resettlement Plan.

18

Annex 1 - Geodipa’s CSR Fra e ork 16

PT Geodipa’s C“R F a e o k o p ises pilla s:

1. GeoDipa Peduli (Community Relations)

Communications with related parties in order to improved the image of the oraganisation - public

relations (sosialisasi) regarding works, provision of extension to schools, scholarships.

2. GeoDipa Maju (Community Services)

Provide community services for public good – infrastructure and facilities, support during religious

season / fetivals – sponsorhip of events, provision of subsidized foodstuffs.

3. Geodipa Pintar (Community Empowering)

Programs that provide wider access to local communities towards self-reliance:

- Empowering community members in coffee and palm sugar processing.

- Empowering community members in relation to Geo-tourism and exposure trips to areas with

successful models.

4. Geodipa Hijau (Nature Conservation)

Tree planting and maintenance with the purpose of rehabilitating the impacts of human activities on the

environment (tree planting program – 10,000 trees).

Table A provides an example of CSR / ComDev activities implemented over FY 2018 – 2019.

Table A: Co u ity De elop e t Acti ities i ple e ted u der GDE’s CSR/Co De

Program over period 2018 – 2019

GDE’s CSR Framework CSR – Community Development Activities Implemented Over Period 2018 - 2019

Geodipa Peduli (Community Relations)

1. Socialization re: geothermal energy (Banjarnegara)

Geodipa Maju (Community Services)

1. Assistance to build public toilets in tourist areas.

2. Assistance for celebrating Tourism Day in Wonosobo.

3. Subsidized foodstuffs (Pasar Murah) during Ramadhan.

4. Waste management (Wonsobo)

5. Contribution to the Dieng Cultural Festival (Banjarnegara)

6. Assistance for new electricity connections (Karang Tengah)

7. Assistance for improving dwellings (Kepakisan)

16 Source : GeoDipa website.

19

GDE’s CSR Framework CSR – Community Development Activities Implemented Over Period 2018 - 2019

8. Provision of potable water supply pipes.

9. Mosque rehabilitation and fence (Pawuhan)

10. Supported the Merdada Festival (tourism development in other

locations)

11. Support for Posyandu services (basic health care)

12. Assistance for school-going children.

13. Support for orphans.

14. Road improvements.

15. Construction of tribune (spectator seating and awning), toilets

and changing room for local football stadium.

16. Support for Dieng Geo-Park.

Geodipa Pintar (Community Empowerment)

1. Assistance to build bridges over pipelines for farmers to better

access their farms.

2. Construction of a space tor processing carica (local fruit like

papaya).

3. Provision of livestock (cattle) to develop animal husbandry

4. Support for small and medium sized enterprises (equipment,

capacity strengthening support from local universities)

5. Provision of Carica seedlings and business training for BUMDEs

(Banjarnegara)

6. Other training for BUMDes.

7. Assistance for small enterprise – Batik Gumelem, Cahaya

Rezeki, Rumah Krepit Albaeta, agricultural enterprises.

8. Fertilizer and pesticide assistance.

9. Developing handicraft souvenirs for tourism industry.

Geodipa Hijau (Nature Conservation)

1. Assistance for Wonosobo Green City.

2. Regreening (Banjarnegara)

20

Annex 2 - Social Mapping Report, 2018

A social mapping and social engineering report concerning the Dieng Geothermal area 17 was prepared

by PT Miranthi Konsultant Permai for PT Geo Dipa Energi in 2018.

The reason for the production of this report was to identify appropriate responses to social resistance

among local communities towards Dieng Geothermal Plant infrastructural development activities which

had its roots in impacts of the Well 30A blow-out. The report provides in-depth socio-economic analyses

of 10 village communities in the vicinity, and proposes a range of PR / social engineering actions.

“o e i fo atio f o this epo t o e i g o te t, a d the lo al o u ities’ p ofile is as follo s:

1. Economic data for Central Java Province (2016)18 – inflation rate - 0.06%, Economic

development – 5.13%. Human Development Index (70%), Poverty level (4.57%), Unemployment

rate – 4.57%, Gini ratio – 0.37.

2. Local communities in Dieng highly value communal living, mutual reliance and mutual help.

3. Community members are predominantly Muslim (> 98%).

4. Percentage (%) of school-aged children attending various levels of schools (2016 figures, average

for Kab. Banjarnegara and Wonosobo): Primary school (95.1%), Lower secondary (68.9%), Upper

secondary (39.3%)

5. Poverty

- In Kab. Banjarnegara (2016), 41% of the population in Kab. Banjarnegara belong to the

group of the lowest 40% in Indonesia. 16.8% of the population in Kab. Banjarnegara belong

to the ground of the lowest 10% in Indonesia.

- In Kab. Wonosobo (2016), 22.07% of the population are categorized as poor (pra-

sejahtera).

6. The social mapping exercise indicates that:

- local community members respect informal leaders in the 10 respective villages. Local

community members and informal leaders respect formal leaders.

- in general, the risk of social problems in the Dieng area it not high. However, there are 4

villages where the risk is relatively higher than in other villages – Desa Karang Tengah and

Desa Kepakisan (Kec. Batur, Kab. Banjarnegara), Desa Sikunang (Kec. Kejajar Kab.

Wonosobo), and Desa Pranten (Kec. Bawang, Kab. Batang). The reasons underlying this

situation are – blow-out at Well 30, landslide at Well 10, and increased salinity of water at

water sources (springs) which affected people in the 4 villages (see section 4.11.1 of the

report). Social engineering is required in these four villages to reduce the risk of conflict

and resistance towards further development of the Dieng Geothermal plant.

17 Laporan Akhir Social Mapping dan Social Engineering di Wilayah Kerja Panas Bumi Dieng 18 Similar statistics not available at Kabupaten level for Kab. Banjarnegara and Wonosobo.

21

The following boxes present extracts from this report with relevant information concerning local

o u ities’ li elihoods a d li elihoods issues as ell as Village Go e e ts’ i stitutio al apa it to access development benefits19:

Recommendations re: Social Improvement :

1. Hasil dari wawancara terhadap aparatur desa dan tokoh masyarakat menunjukkan bahwa

masih ada aparatur ataupun tokoh masyarakat yang belum dapat melakukan identifikasi

pemanfaatan potensi desa, mulai dari potensi pertanian, potensi seni budaya dan wisata,

hingga potensi bisnis UMKM. Untuk mengatasi permasalahan ini, PT Geo Dipa Energi dapat

melakukan hal-hal berikut:

1. Bekerja sama dengan institusi pendidikan (universitas, kampus, institut) untuk

menyelenggarakan Kuliah Kerja Nyata (KKN) atau Program Pengabdian Masyarakat di

wilayah desa binaan PT. Geo Dipa Energi. Tujuan dari program ini adalah menghasilkan

proposal bisnis yang dapat digunakan oleh PT Geo Dipa Energi sebagai naskah akademik

dalam merancang program c ommunity d evelopment .

2. Bekerja sama dengan LSM atau institusi pendidikan (universitas, kampus, institut) untuk

mengimplementasikan program community development yang dirancang dari proposal

bisnis hasil KKN atau Pengabdian Masyarakat

2. Temuan lapangan setelah melakukan indepth interview dengan para aparatur desa

menunjukkan bahwa pemahaman program Pemerintah, seperti Program Dana Desa serta

BUMDes, belum dipahami secara utuh. Untuk mengatasi permasalahan tersebut, PT Geo Dipa

Energi dapat membuat sebuah proposal pemberdayaan aparatur desa sehubungan dengan

permintaan sosialisasi mengenai Program Pemerintah Dana Desa dan BUMDes.

Recommendations re: Social Enhancement

Desa Karang Tengah

3. Hasil in-depth interview yang dilakukan kepada aparatur desa dan tokoh masyarakat di Desa

Karang Tengah menunjukkan bahwa Desa Karangtengah memiliki beberapa potensi, yaitu:

i) Potensi pertanian: kentang, wortel, kubis, purwaceng, carica, dan terong belanda

ii) Potensi wisata dan seni budaya: Telaga Merdada, Grup Kesenian Rodad, Grup Sholawat

Janen (Tampil rutin di DCF), dan Grup Jepin

iii) Potensi UMKM: stik kentang, keripik kentang

iv) BUMDes: pengeloaan air bersih

4. Berdasarkan dari informasi tersebut, social enchancement yang dapat dilakukan di Desa

19 The consultant has not as yet had enough time to translate the following sections.

22

Karangtengah, antara lain:

i) Pendampingan pembentukan dan operasional BUMDes (Program GDE Pintar)

ii) Pendampingan pengelolaan air bersih (Program GDE Pintar dan GDE Maju)

iii) Pendampingan pengelolaan Telaga Merdada (Program GDE Pintar dan GDE Maju)

iv) Pendampingan kelompok tani, terutama dalam proses pengadaan bibit kentang (Program

GDE Pintar dan GDE Maju)

v) Pendampingan UMKM produksi stik kentang dan kripik kentang (Program GDE Pintar)

Desa Kepakisan

5. Hasil in-depth interview yang dilakukan kepada aparatur desa dan tokoh masyarakat di Desa

Kepakisan menunjukkan bahwa Desa Kepakisan memiliki beberapa potensi, yaitu:

i) Potensi pertanian: kentang, wortel, kubis, dan carica.

ii) Potensi wisata dan seni budaya: Pemandian Air Panas Dusun Bitingan

iii) Potensi UMKM: pengolahan carica (manisan, dodol, dll)

iv) BUMDes: mengelola Pemandian Air Panas Dusun Bitingan

6. Berdasarkan dari informasi tersebut, social enchancement yang dapat dilakukan di Desa

Kepakisan, antara lain:

i) Pendampingan kelompok tani, terutama dalam proses bercocoktanam (Program GDE

Pintar)

ii) Pendampingan kelompok wanita tani/PKK, terutama dalam proses pengolahan carica

(Program GDE Pintar)

iii) Pendampingan pembentukan dan operasional BUMDes Wisata Pemandian Air Panas

(Program GDE Pintar dan GDE Maju).

23

Annex 3 - Public Consultation Records20 including Gender Aspects

Initial public consultations were conducted over 21-23 March with 6 village communities living in the

area where the existing Dieng Geothermal complex is located. Relevant information pertaining to local

o u ities’ li elihood halle ges a d eeds i the ase of Desa Ka a g Te gah a d Desa Kepakisa are presented below:

Karang Tengah Village

1. Karang Tengah is an old village. About 15% of the population are immigrants (pendatang). The

main livelihood activities are potato and vegetable farming and provision of farm labour. Of the

people ho pa ti ipated i the s all g oup dis ussio , t o e e la dless. .. % o residents have land certificates whilst the other 75% possess SPPT. The average size of

landholding is 2,000 m2. The main produce is carica, chillies, potatoes, carrots, spring onions and

te o g ela da. As fa la ou e s, e ea Rp. , /da hilst o e ea Rp. 40.000/day. There are only 3 households who rear cows for beef. The group said that farming

activities do not absorb all their time; they are underemployed (nganggur) for about 50% of the

time.

2. Indicative income – Potatoes take 3-4 months to harvest. For 2,000 m2 of land, the expected

harvest is 6 tons, and the price of potatoes is Rp. 8,000/kg. Average net income per harvest –

Rp. 48 million (per 4 months) less cost of inputs.

3. Residents are not permitted to cultivate land in the protection forest administered by PT

Perhutani.

4. Participants felt the following benefits linked to the presence of the Dieng geothermal facility in

their vicinity.

- Able to enjoy electricity connections.

- Improved access to farms.

- Assistance for poor households.

5. The village community hopes that more people will be recruited by PT Geodipa to work at its

Dieng geothermal complex. Participants understand that people will be recruited based on their

competency for the positions.

6. A resident (Bpk. Patur Sahroni) who lives near Wellpad 30 has requested that PT Geodipa buy

his land (because his agriculture is continually affected by hot steam or replace / provide him

with an alternative piece of land.

20 Source: Public Consultations Notes in Patuha and Dieng (18-23 March 2019); Gender Analysis and Action Plan, R.

Pupasari, D.Novianti, May 2019.

24

7. Two hamlets (Dusun) have suffered more from pollution than the others – Pawuhan and

Simpangan. They request more CSR attention than others or other villages further away from

Dieng Geothermal facilities.

8. The community is not aware when there are any job vacancy announcements at the PT Geodipa

Dieng plant. (An on-line medium for announcing vacancies excludes village communities who

tend not to be wired.)

9. In some places, steam pipelines block the access to farms (JUT – jalan usaha tani). While there

are ladders to cross over the pipes in some places, many have rusted and cannot be used. The

community request PT Geodipa to repair the ladders.

10. Types of training requested:

- Training for SMA graduates to equip them for jobs in PT Geodipa Dieng Geothermal facility.

- Safety.

- Processing of agricultural produce (plus equipment).

- Waste recycling.

Kepakisan Village

1. Productive land is scarce. Average landholdings range from 400 - 800 m2. Many households are

landless. About 25% of residents own relatively larger landholdings (wong sugih). Based on small

group discussion, about 200 farmers share-crop on unutilized land owned by PT Geodipa. Each

person was allotted 200 m2. The primary source of income for land owning farmers is from

working their own land. The second largest contribution towards household income comes from

providing farm labour to their neighbours. The third largest contribution comes from working on

land rented from PT Geodipa. As farm labourers, men earn Rp. 50,000/day whilst women earn

Rp. 30,000 - 40.000/day. Small group discussion participants said that they may only get work as

farm labourers for about 12 days a month.

2. The tourism industry in Dieng is able to provide employment opportunities for the youth. There

are also some residents who have emigrated out of the area (eg. 20 residents have gone to

Kalimantan for work, others have gone overseas as foreign labour - TKI).

3. There is a primary school (SD) and lower secondary school (SMP) in the Village of Dieng Kulon

(or West Dieng). The closest high / upper secondary school is located in Batur (sub-district /

Kecamatan centre).

4. CSR program activities provided to residents of Kepakisan Village:

- Repair of uninhabitable houses.

- Electricity connections.

- Subsidised market (pasar murah)

- Development of hot springs facility.

25

5. There are a number of croppers cultivating Geodipa owned land. The Village Head affirmed that

these croppers understand that they would have to cease their activities if Geodipa needs to

utilize these land areas. However, he requested that they be given ample notice (at least 3

months) so that they may harvest any existing crops when they are ripe, before giving up the

land. The small discussion group also requested that PT Geodipa provide some form of

empowerment support to people who lose access to productive land.

6. Income restoration may most likely be triggered in the case of Dieng 2 expansion esp. for

farmers who are cultivating Geodipa land and whom Geodipa will request to relocate to make

way for a new project. Some small discussion group participants also suggested the possibility of

animal husbandry as there is ample vegetation for fodder.

7. Aspirations and requests:

- Support the Village in finding a solution to garbage management problems.

- Collaboration and support for the local orphans foundation.

- Provision of training for sustainable economic development.

- Repair of roads in bad condition.

- Support for small enterprises (food processing).

- More women hired by PT Geodipa at the Dieng site.

26

Annex 4 - Gender Analysis & Gender Action Plan

Gender Analysis

Relevant information for the gender analysis and action plan based on gender disaggregated meetings

conducted during the above public consultations activity discussed in Section D above are as follows:

1. Livelihoods and Income. The most common livelihood is agriculture (rice, carrots, potato and

mushroom). Other livelihoods are trading and civil servant. Both men and women may be self-

employed or employed by individual landowners. There is a different wage for female and male

laborers. Female workers earn approximately IDR 30,000 per day (± USD 2) for working from

morning to noon. While male workers earn IDR 50,000 per day (± USD 3.5/day) for working from

morning to late afternoon.

2. Education. Most villages in Dieng only have elementary schools, therefore, families have to send

children to Wonosobo (one hour from Dieng) to pursue junior and high school. For this purpose,

money is needed for transportation cost as well as living cost (accommodation and meals) if the

children stay in Wonosobo. A woman participant in the group discussion said that she has to spend

IDR , , pe o th ± U“D fo he hild’s e pe ses to sta i Dieng. Female villagers in

Dieng admitted that they have to take on additional work such as working longer hours in the farms

elo gi g to othe eigh o hood to get e t a i o e fo thei hild e ’s edu atio . I othe o ds, o e ’s illage s ha e igge urden with family responsibilities.

3. Electricity. Both Patuha and Dieng are grid-a ea, thus illage s’ households a e ele t ified. “o e poor households received support from CSR program for electricity installation cost. During public

consultations with GDE, villagers expressed their hope to obtain free electricity from GDE. GDE

responded that electricity distribution is not in the mandate of GDE work.

4. Clean Water. Women villagers in Dieng said that ever since the operation of GDE power plant, clean

water is difficult to obtain. This situation has caused women villagers to spend additional hours to

fetch drinking water for their families. Women in Dieng said that they could take ten minutes up to

three hours to get clean/drinking water from the nearest source. In dry season, they obtain clean

water from the neighboring villages. Alternatively, they have to buy water for IDR 25,000/gallon (±

USD 1.7). Women in Pranten Village informed that it was confirmed by dentists that the corrosive

water for brushing teeth caused their teeth to become porous.

5. Social Assistance Program. Go e e t’s so ial assista e p og a has ee dist i uted to so e of the poor and vulnerable households in Dieng. Government social assistance for poor and vulnerable

households include education grants for children, cash transfers from the Family Hope Program

(PKH), rice from the Rice Welfare Program (Rastra); and health care from the government-financed

national healthcare insurance program (Jamkesmas) and local government-financed health

insurance schemes (Jamkesda).

27

6. Benefits from GDE. Villagers have felt the benefits from GDE presence such as improved roads, job

opportunity (generally for men), and health services (from GDE in-house health service), use of

heavy equipment/machine during natural disaster particularly landslides. Some villagers have also

e ei ed e efit f o GDE’s C“R i the fo of t ai i gs aste a age e t, food p o essi g, et . , infrastructure (mosque), and provision of equipment to support MSMEs.

7. Needs. Women villagers addressed the needs to improve their business. They need training on food

processing to turn agriculture commodity to quality snacks, packaging and marketing. Some of them

would also like to be trained in sewing for clothes-making as they would like to make use of their

sewing machines. In Dieng particularly, women would like to enhance their capacity in managing

homestay, including online booking, networking with tour operators, and managing finance. Apart

from trainings, women also addressed the needs for mentoring as trainings are usually conducted

for only 1 or 2 days which are not sufficient to build their capacity, therefore mentoring is needed so

that technical assistance can be continued. In addition to that, capital to start or expand their

business is also needed.

8. Expectations towards GDE. Women villagers hope to get information about job opportunities from

GDE. Some women are interested in job opportunities for unskilled positions, and some in skilled

positions. Other women are not interested in working at GDE but they are keen to serve as vendors

for GDE, such as catering and stationery supplier. They hope that job or partnership opportunities at

GDE are disseminated to women groups (PKK, posyandu, pengajian). In addition to that, women

village s ould also like to ha e i fo atio a out GDE’s C“R p og a , a el hat t pes of program/activities that can be supported by GDE, timeline for proposal submission, and format for

proposal. Women villagers informed that GDE usually disseminate information about job

opportunities and CSR program to the village office, thus the information does not reach women

villagers.

Gender Action Plan

9. Employment opportunities. Empower the contractors to employ local labor, including women, in

project construction activities:

- Skilled and unskilled labor opportunities for women maximized (Target 10%) (Reference point:

TBC by GDE)

- Contractors agreements to include: equal pay for work of equal value, gender-related core

labor standards, special facilities for women workers and gender-inclusive awareness raising

for risk mitigation.21

10. Participation in planning. Ensure fair participation of women in public consultations to discuss GDE

CSR program.

- Public consultations held with at least 30% women participants to discuss GDE CSR programs.

(Reference point: Patuha: 23%; Dieng 24%)

21 Risks associated with large infrastructure projects could include sexually transmitted infections (STIs) and human

trafficking, with women especially vulnerable to such risks.

28

- “epa ate eeti gs fo o e a e o du ted to ide tif o e ’s p io ities a d eeds fo strengthening local organizational capacity.

11. Participation in livelihood training. Ensure fair participation of women in trainings on livelihood

activities.

- At least XX people (of whom 30% are women) reported increased knowledge and skills for

improved livelihood activities. (DMF 3b). (Reference point: Patuha: 23%; Dieng 24%)

- Trainings are conducted in locations and at times convenient for women.

29

Annex 5 – Intermediate Assessment of Responsive Livelihood Restoration Assistance Matrix

PT Geodipa’s CSR Framework

CSR Program for 2018 & 2019

Livelihood Needs, Issues, Requests, Expectations documented

by various assessments and reports

Recommendations provided in various assessments / reports

Focus on Immediate (short-

medium term) Strategic

Interventions for Livelihood

Restoration

Geodipa Peduli

(Community

Relations)

1. Socialization re: geothermal energy

(Banjarnegara)

1. Disseminate information re: job opportunities for men and women

(for both skilled and unskilled positions).

2. Disse i ate i fo atio e: pa t e ship oppo tu ities to o e ’s groups (PKK, Posyandu, pengajian).

3. Disse i ate i fo atio a out GDE’s C“R p og a di e tl to o e / o e ’s g oups iz. hat t pes of p og a /a ti ities that

can be supported by GDE, timeline for proposal submission, and

format for proposal.

4. Due to negative impacts (pollution) experienced, Dusun Pawuhan

and Dusun Simpangan (hamlets)request more CSR attention than

others or other villages further away from Dieng Geothermal

facilities.

Geodipa Maju

(Community

Services)

1. Assistance to build public toilets in tourist

areas.

2. Assistance for celebrating Tourism Day in

Wonosobo.

3. Subsidized foodstuffs (Pasar Murah)

during Ramadhan.

4. Waste management (Wonsobo)

5. Contribution to the Dieng Cultural

Festival (Banjarnegara)

6. Assistance for new electricity connections

(Karang Tengah)

7. Assistance for improving dwellings

(Kepakisan)

8. Provision of potable water supply pipes.

9. Mosque rehabilitation and fence

(Pawuhan)

10. Supported the Merdada Festival (tourism

development in other locations)

11. Support for Posyandu services (basic

health care)

12. Assistance for school-going children.

13. Support for orphans.

14. Road improvements.

15. Counstruction of tribune (spectator

seating and awning), toilets and changing

room for local football stadium.

16. Support for Dieng Geo-Park.

1. Access to clean potable water (wo e ’s st ategi eeds

Kepakisan Village

2. Support Village in finding a solution to garbage management

problems.

3. Collaboration and support for the local orphans foundation.

Karang Tengah Village

4. Safety.

5. Waste recycling.

6. Repair of steps / ladders across pipeli es to fa e s’ fa oads.

30

PT Geodipa’s CSR Framework

CSR Program for 2018 & 2019

Livelihood Needs, Issues, Requests, Expectations documented

by various assessments and reports

Recommendations provided in various assessments / reports

Focus on Immediate (short-

medium term) Strategic

Interventions for Livelihood

Restoration

Geodipa Pintar

(Community

Empowerment)

1. Assistance for journalistic school.

2. Assistance to build bridges over pipelines

for farmers to better access their farms.

3. Construction of a space tor processing

carica (local fruit like papaya).

4. Provision of livestock (cattle) to develop

animal husbandry

5. Support for small and medium sized

enterprises (equipment, capacity

strengthening support from local

universities)

6. Provision of Carica seedlings and business

training for BUMDEs (Banjarnegara)

7. Other training for BUMDes.

8. Assistance for small enterprise – Batik

Gumelem, Cahaya Rezeki, Rumah Krepit

Albaeta, agricultural enterprises.

9. Fertilizer and pesticide assistance.

10. Developing handicraft souvenirs for

tourism industry.

1. Request from 24 tenant farmers on Geodipa-owned land (Mess

PLN) - Provide access to alternative productive land for tenant

farmers and croppers (penggarap) to rent.

2. More women hired by PT Geodipa at the Dieng site.

3. Open up vendor opportunities to local people / women (eg.

catering, stationary etc.).

4. “uppo t fo o e ’s usi esses. 5. Training in food processing, packaging and marketing.

6. Training in sewing/tailoring for women.

7. Training in managing home-stays, on-line bookings, networking with

tour agents.

8. Post-training mentoring.

9. Access to capital for starting-up small businesses/enterprises.

Desa Kepakisan

10. Provision of training for sustainable economic development.

11. Repair of roads in bad condition.

12. Support for small enterprises (food processing).

13. Consider animal husbandry as livelihood restoration option. Plenty

of vegetation/fodder.

14. Empowerment support for those who lose access to productive

land.

Desa Karang Tengah

15. Training for SMA graduates to equip them for jobs in PT Geodipa

Dieng Geothermal facility.

16. Processing of agricultural produce (plus equipment).

1. Empower the contractors to employ local labor, including

women, in project construction activities.

2. Ensure fair participation of women in public consultations to

discuss GDE CSR program.

3. Ensure fair participation of women in trainings on livelihood

activities.

4. Collaborate with education institutions to provide Kuliah Kerja

Nyata (KKN) or Program Pengabdian Masyarakat support to

village communities in the Dieng Geothermal Power Plant

vicinity. The purpose is to work with the communities to

formulate business proposals that may be considered as

academic bases for programming community development.

5. Collaborate with local NGOs to educational institutions to

support the communities in implementing the above community

development programs.

6. Based on indepth interviews with Village Govt personnel, it was

found that Government programs such as Dana Desa, BUMDes

are not well understood. PT Geodipa Dieng may propose to

empower local Government personnel by brokering additional

sosialisasi ele a t Ka upate Go e e t age ies.

Desa Kepakisan

7. Identify opportunities in tourism, eco-tourism.

8. Develop potential for hot water springs in Dusun Bitingan, and

BUMDES role in promoting this. (GDE Pintar and GDE Maju)

9. Facilitation of farmer groups in improving agricultural

practices.(Geodipa Pintar_

10. Develop potential and facilitate women farmer groups and PKK

in processing carica – manisan, dodol (GDE Pintar)

11. Pendampingan pembentukan dan operasional BUMDes

(Program GDE Pintar)

12. Pendampingan pengelolaan air bersih (Program GDE Pintar dan

GDE Maju).

13. Pendampingan pengelolaan Telaga Merdada (Program GDE

Pintar dan GDE Maju)

14. Pendampingan kelompok tani, terutama dalam proses

pengadaan bibit kentang (Program GDE Pintar dan GDE Maju)

15. Pendampingan UMKM produksi stik kentang dan kripik kentang

(Program GDE Pintar)

Desa Karang Tengah

1. Provide access to alternative

productive land for tenant

farmers and croppers

(penyewa) to rent.

2. Improvement of existing

economic activities.

3. Provision of alternative

livelihood opportunities –

i) livestock (cattle, goats) +

training, and extension

(abundance of fodder

material).

ii) small enterprise

development esp. for

women + equipment +

training + mentoring

(souvenirs for tourists,

food processing, tailoring.

welding, homestays)

iii) Identify and support

development of local

potential / opportunities

(packages) in tourism, eco-

tourism, trekking etc.

4. Training in

i) sustainable economic

development;

ii) welding (las);

iii) food processing,

packaging, marketing;

iv) sewing / tailoring;

v) managing home-stays, on-

line booking, networking

with tour agents.

vi) new tourism opportunities

/ packages.

vii) Post-training mentoring.

5. Provide capital or facilitate

access to loans for starting-up

small businesses. (Explore

feasibility of revolving funds).

6. Explore any existing or

potential BUMDes income

31

PT Geodipa’s CSR Framework

CSR Program for 2018 & 2019

Livelihood Needs, Issues, Requests, Expectations documented

by various assessments and reports

Recommendations provided in various assessments / reports

Focus on Immediate (short-

medium term) Strategic

Interventions for Livelihood

Restoration

16. Develop cultural tourism potential - various groups (Telaga

Merdada, Grup Kesenian Rodad. Grup Sholowat janen, and Grup

Jepin.)

17. Develop food processing.

18. Facilitate Bumdes establishment and operations (GDE Pintar)

19. P o ote Bu des’ ole i a agi g ate suppl GDE Pintar

and GDE Maju).

20. Facilitation in the management of Telaga Merdada. (Program

GDE Pintar dan GDE Maju).

21. Mentoring and facilitation of farmer groups particularly in

obtaining good quality potato stock for planting (GDE Pintar and

GDE Maju).

22. Mentoring and facilitating UMKM in producing potato sticks and

Catherine (GDE Pintar).

generating activities that may

be able/developed to absorb

AHs.

7. Prioritise for employment

opportunities within PT

Geodipa Dieng.

8. Provide vendor opportunities

to entrepreneurs among AHs.

9. Educational assistance for

children / youth to reduce

financial burden on family.

Geodipa Hijau

(Nature

Conservation)

1. Assistance for Wonosobo Green City.

2. Regreening (Banjarnegara)

Other

Terms of Reference for Specialist NGO Services

Objective: To support GDE in (i) formulating a Development Partnership Roadmap for

GDE Dieng and local communities based on mutual benefit, and (ii) to reorient its ComDev

strategy and program activities so as to be more strategic and responsive to highland eco-

system destabilisation and livelihood challenges faced by local communities.

Scope of Work: Based on assessment of reports and relevant academic and knowledge products produced to date, the specialist NGO will support the PMU in reorienting and reformulating its approach and strategy for (i) public relations1 so as to build stronger partnership relations with local communities in order to increase community acceptance and buy-in for geothermal development in their midst 2 and (ii) Community Development in the Dieng area. Specialist NGO services will provide GDE with a Development Partnership Road Map for improving relations and cooperation with local communities by investing in more inclusive development initiatives and strategic livelihood security solutions. The Roadmap will identify strategic investments for period 2021-2024. A performance evaluation prior to Project completion will provide inputs for improving ComDev program performance and for identifying future investment opportunities.

Duration: 12 months

No of personnel: 8 (maximum) 3

Detailed Tasks and/or Expected Output

Support the PMU and IAs in the following areas:

1. Compile and assess existing knowledge and information on the socio-political-economic and ecological (state of the eco-system) situation in Dieng and the communities in the Dieng Geothermal work area.

2. Strengthen Village Governments’ capacity for development planning through introduction and facilitation of the development of SID+++ (geo-social-spatial Village Information System) process and instruments4 in 6 Villages in the Dieng geothermal work area (Wilayah Kerja Panas Bumi Dieng).

i) Train 60 Village Development cadres (10 persons per village from Village Government, LKMD and BUMDES personnel).

ii) Setting up of a web-based SID+++ system with dashboard.

1 in collaboration with the Communications Specialist. 2 consistent with social engineering recommendations of the Social Mapping & Social Engineering Report, PT Miranthi Konsultan Permai in collaboration with Geo Dipa Energi, 2018. 3 Deployment of personnel will depend on the tasks being undertaken at the time. 4 based on GOI Law no. 6 / 2014 concerning Villages, and Minister of Villages, Development of Isolated Villages, and Transmigration No. 16/2018 concerning priority for utilization of Dana Desa funds for 2019

iii) Support the Villages in production of SID++ analyses and reports for each village.

3. Based on outputs of activities 1 and 2 above, review and redesign (i) GDE’s overall

approach to one of development partnership with local communities, (ii) public relations strategy and (iii) ComDev strategy and program.5

4. In consultation with stakeholders, formulate a Roadmap for Development Partnership between GDE and local communities.

5. Pay especial attention to the prospects for developing tourism6 for creating new small business and employment opportunities for local people.

6. Implementation of the reformulated public relations strategy and reoriented ComDev program activities.

7. Performance monitoring and evaluation of outputs and outcomes to inform future ComDev programming beyond the Project period.

Annex 1 provides a budget for provision of the specialist NGO services.

5 Outputs of the above SID++ process will also inform updating of Village Development Medium and Short-term plans and leverage Government and other external financing for more strategic development activities. 6 including educational tourism concerning geothermal energy and development.

Appendix 19A

Terms of Reference

Expertise Resettlement Specialist

Expertise Group

Source International

Duration: 3 months (Jakarta, Dieng, Patuha)

Objective and Purpose of the Assignment: To support the Geothermal Power Generation Project Management Unit (GPG PMU) in (i) complying with ADB Social Safeguards ADB SPS 2009 per Loan covenants and as specified in the Resettlement Plan, and (ii) implementing land acquisition, livelihood restoration activities.

Scope of Work: The international social safeguards / livelihood security and restoration specialist will have two broad tasks. (i) To assist GDE to update the Dieng-2 sub-project Resettlement Plan and to implement the updated Resettlement Plan, and Compliance Action Plan in the Patuha-2 Due Diligence Report. The specialist will also assist GDE to procure NGO services and guide NGOs’ implementation of their tasks. The consultant will be supported by a national social safeguards / resettlement consultant.

Detailed Tasks and/or Expected Output

The consultant will preferably be a postgraduate in social safeguards, involuntary resettlement or other relevant field with preferably 15 years of working in Indonesia on social impacts in infrastructure projects. The consultant will help the PMU and concerned sub-project units of GDE to (i) update and implement the Dieng-2 Resettlement Plan, and (ii) to implement and monitor the Patuha-2 compliance Action Plan outlined in the Due Diligence Report for the Patuha-2 sub-project. The consultant will also help strengthen the capacity and institutions of GDE in social dimensions of public investments. S/he should be able to speak, understand and write well in English. The responsibilities of the resettlement specialist will include:

1. Review and update (if necessary) the draft Resettlement Plan for the Dieng-2 sub-project and the Due Diligence Report for the Patuha-2 sub-project in light of the FEED study.

2. Provide capacity building in social safeguards to social safeguards assistant manager at GDE HQ and social safeguards focal persons at Unit level.

i) Capacity building in land acquisition to focus on:

a. explaining the prevailing legal framework (applicable laws and regulations, technical guidance, etc.) as well as the ADB SPS 2009;

b. procedures on land acquisition depending on the type of land (e.g., forest, government land), and on compliance with spatial planning and required permits project location permits, forestry permits / IPPKH, dispensation permits etc.) ;

c. land/assets valuation, consultations, budget, monitoring, transfer of assets;

d. Assistance in preparation of technical guidance for land acquisition and livelihood restoration assistance (if necessary).

(The training manual on social safeguards in land acquisition developed under ADB TA 7566 and TA 8661 can be used as reference for the land acquisition capacity building exercise.)

3. Support the PMU and sub-project PMU offices in the following stages of project preparation and implementation:

i) in preparing for RP implementation for the Dieng-2 sub-project, and for implementing the compliance Action Plan for the Patuha-2 sub-project.

a. Establishing and operationalizing the GRM. b. conduct necessary Sosialisasi as indicated in the Communication and

Participation Plan for the implementation stage of the sub-projects. ii) to implement the compliance Action Plan for Patuha-2 sub-project. iii) to implement the updated RP for the Dieng-2 sub-project and associated

Livelihood Restoration Strategy and Plan for 30 AHs. iv) conducting M & E of compliance Action Plan, implementation of resettlement

activities (land acquisition, fair and free negotiations, timely identification and securing of alternative land to be rented by tenant farmers, social preparation for accessing livelihood restoration / enhancement activities under the GDE ComDev program.

4. The specialist will support the PMU in procurement of NGO services for facilitation

of the livelihood restoration activities for 30 AHs, and livelihood enhancement activities for 110 vulnerable households in the 5 villages surrounding Dieng Geothermal facility.

Appendix 19B

Terms of Reference

Expertise Resettlement Specialist

Expertise Group

Source national

Duration: ...months (Jakarta, Dieng, Patuha)

Objective and Purpose of the Assignment: To support the Geothermal Power Generation Project Management Unit (GPG PMU) in (i) complying with ADB Social Safeguards ADB SPS 2009 per Loan covenants and as specified in the Resettlement Plan, and (ii) implementing land acquisition, livelihood restoration activities.

Scope of Work: The international social safeguards / livelihood security and restoration specialist will have two broad tasks. (i) To assist GDE to update the Dieng-2 sub-project Resettlement Plan and to implement the updated Resettlement Plan, and Compliance Action Plan in the Patuha-2 Due Diligence Report. The specialist will also assist GDE to procure NGO services and guide NGOs’ implementation of their tasks. The consultant will be supported by a national social safeguards / resettlement consultant.

Detailed Tasks and/or Expected Output

The consultant will preferably be a graduate in social development, involuntary resettlement or other relevant field with preferably 10 years of working experience in addressing social impacts in infrastructure projects. The consultant will support the international specialist and help the PMU and concerned sub-project units of GDE to (i) update and implement the Dieng-2 Resettlement Plan, and (ii) to implement and monitor the Patuha-2 compliance Action Plan outlined in the Due Diligence Report for the Patuha-2 sub-project. The consultant will also support training of key GDE personnel in social safeguards compliance. S/he should be able to speak, understand and write well in English. The responsibilities of the resettlement specialist will include:

1. Assist in the review and update (if necessary) the draft Resettlement Plan for the Dieng-2 sub-project and the Due Diligence Report for the Patuha-2 sub-project in light of the FEED study.

2. Support training in social safeguards to social safeguards assistant manager at GDE HQ and social safeguards focal persons at Unit level.

i) Capacity building in land acquisition to focus on:

a. explaining the prevailing legal framework (applicable laws and regulations, technical guidance, etc.) as well as the ADB SPS 2009;

b. procedures on land acquisition depending on the type of land (e.g., forest, government land), and on compliance with spatial planning and required permits project location permits, forestry permits / IPPKH, dispensation permits etc.) ;

c. land/assets valuation, consultations, budget, monitoring, transfer of assets;

d. Assistance in preparation of technical guidance for land acquisition and livelihood restoration assistance (if necessary).

(The training manual on social safeguards in land acquisition developed under ADB TA 7566 and TA 8661 can be used as reference for the land acquisition capacity building exercise.)

3. Support the PMU and sub-project PMU offices in the following stages of project preparation and implementation:

i) in preparing for RP implementation for the Dieng-2 sub-project, and for implementing the compliance Action Plan for the Patuha-2 sub-project.

a. Establishing and operationalizing the GRM. b. conduct necessary Sosialisasi as indicated in the Communication and

Participation Plan for the implementation stage of the sub-projects. ii) to implement the compliance Action Plan for Patuha-2 sub-project. iii) to implement the updated RP for the Dieng-2 sub-project and associated

Livelihood Restoration Strategy and Plan for 30 AHs. iv) conducting M & E of compliance Action Plan, implementation of resettlement

activities (land acquisition, fair and free negotiations, timely identification and securing of alternative land to be rented by tenant farmers, social preparation for accessing livelihood restoration / enhancement activities under the GDE ComDev program.

4. The specialist will support the PMU overseeing livelihood restoration activities for 30

AHs, and livelihood enhancement activities for 110 vulnerable households in the 5 villages surrounding Dieng Geothermal facility.

TEMPLATE FOR INTERNAL MONITORING REPORT

1. Project Description

This section provides a general description of the sub-project, discusses sub-project

components that result in land acquisition, involuntary resettlement, or both and identify

the project area. It also describes the alternatives considered to avoid or minimize

resettlement.

1.1 Scope of sub-project impacts

Discusses the sub-project’s impacts, and include maps of the areas or zone of

impact of project components or activities

1.2 Objectives of internal monitoring.

- Describe the aspects included in the monitoring and evaluation report

- Describe the role of stakeholders / agency in implementation of resettlement

2. Detailed Resettlement Implementation Progress

2.1 General Progress in RP implementation

Describe implementation of RP phase appropriate to RP document;

i) Social safeguards staff appointed and mobilized at Jakarta and field offices.

ii) Capacity building and training activities completed on schedule;

iii) Social preparation phase per schedule.

iv) Progress of compensation status for each sub-project component;

v) Permit status (IPPKH, lease from PTP VIII),

vi) Entitlements disbursed, compared with number and category of losses set out

in the entitlement matrix.

vii) Land acquisition and vacation of land per schedule.

viii) Achievement of resettlement, livelihood restoration and CSR reorientation /

CDP activities against agreed implementation plan.

2.2 Disclosure, Consultation and Participation

i) Describe the consultation and participation mechanism that was used during

the stages of project cycle;

ii) Summarise the results of consultations with affected persons, woman

participants, vulnerable groups;

iii) Discuss how concerns raised and recommendations made were addressed.

iv) Translation of information disclosed in the local language.

2.3 Grievance Redress Mechanism

i) Knowledge of the entitlement by the affected/displaced persons,

ii) Use of grievance redress mechanism by affected/displaced person and

iii) Timely (information) feedback concerning the resolution grievances.

iv) Performance - % of grievances invalidated, resolved, resolved within

stipulated time frame, resolved outside stipulated time frame, time taken to

resolve different types of grievances,

v) No. of grievances resolved at Level 1, Level 2 and Level 3.

vi) Number and types of outstanding grievances.

2.4 Budget and Time Frame

i) Funds allocation for resettlement to resettlement agencies on time.

ii) Fund disbursement according to RP and DDR on time.

iii) Receipt of resettlement funds by IA and beneficiaries in a timely manner.

2.5 Income Restoration Program

i) No. of AHs who successfully secured new land to lease / purchase 3-9 months

of vacating mess PLN or relinquishing acquired land to GDE.

ii) No. of AHs who did not replace land, and reasons for not doing so.

iii) No. of beneficiaries per each type of activity including employment

opportunities (total, men, women, Priority 1 AHs, Priority 2 AHs, Priority 3 and

4 AHs.)

iv) Extent of AH participation in activities (by Priority level)

Describe percentage of successful enterprises:

v) Breaking even,

vi) Profitable and able to improve AHs’ standard of living.

vii) Describe degree of satisfaction with support received for livelihood programs.

2.6 Benefit Monitoring

Using the SEC database as baseline data on socio-economic conditions of AHs

prior to sub-project implementation, describe changes, benefits received /

experienced from the sub-project by affected/displaced persons:

i) Describe the characteristics of replacement land AHs were able to lease /

purchase using compensation funds.

ii) Has cultivation of replacement land been able to restore AHs cash flow ? To

what extent ? (Compare against baseline production information).

iii) Noticeable changes in patterns of production and resource use compared to

pre-project situation;

iv) Changes of income and expenditure patterns compared with pre-project

situation;

a. Key Indicator – amount of annual alms (zakat) paid. (Establish

baseline for annual zakat payments per AH)

v) Changes in key social and cultural parameters relating to living standard.

a. Changes in amount of donation for Sabtu Wage celebrations.

(Establish baseline/pre-project amount/level of contributions per AH)

vi) Changes that have occurred to all AHs, with particular attention to Priority 1

AHs.

vii) Evaluate and recommend how to improve performance.

3. DDR Action Plan

Assess timely implementation of Action Plan.

TERMS OF REFERENCE

Geothermal Power Generation Project (Dieng-2 Expansion Facilities)

External Monitoring Agency for Post RP Implementation Evaluation

A. Background

1. The Republic of Indonesia has the world’s largest geothermal potential, estimated at 29,000 MW. Since the issuance of the Geothermal Law in 2003, the Government of Indonesia

(GOI) has prioritized development of this resource. As of January 2019, the installed capacity

of geothermal energy in Indonesia was 1,948.5 MW (6.72 % of total potential). In the RUPTL1,

the government plans for an additional 4,443 MW of installed geothermal capacity by 20272.

The government also intends for state-owned enterprises, such as PT PLN (Perusahaan

Listrik Negara – State Electricity Company) and PT Geo Dipa Energi (GDE), to play an

important role for sustaining geothermal growth in the near term.

2. The Asian Development Bank (ADB) will provide a loan to GDE to support expanded

geothermal electricity generation in Java to increase renewable energy baseload and reduce

Indonesia’s reliance on coal. The proposed GPGP will provide financing for expanding

geothermal power generation via the Dieng-2 sub-project – expansion of geothermal electric

generating capacity by 55 MW at the existing Dieng Geothermal Plant. Dieng 2 project is

located in the Districts of Wonosobo and Banjarnegara, Central Java Province

3. The Dieng Geothermal Expansion sub-project (Dieng-2) will include drilling of new

wells for geothermal fluid production and re-injection, and development of a steam above

ground gathering system and fluid re-injection lines connecting wells and generating units.

The sub-project will also support the transmission interconnection systems between the plants

and the grid; this will include a new, 6-km underground transmission line to the Dieng Sub-

station. The expansion of the existing Dieng Geothermal Plant will require a total of 308,289

m2 (30.83 ha). Of this, 305,279 m2 (99 %) is already owned by Geo Dipa, while 3,010 m2 is

privately owned land.

4. Land acquisition and clearing will be required for two sub-project components, i.e (i)

Acquisition of 3,010 m2 of privately owned land for a new pipeline and access road from

Wellpad 9 to Geodipa-owned proposed site for Dieng-2 power plant which will be conducted

through negotiated land acquisition as the land to be acquired is a relatively small plot3. ADB

policy related to negotiated settlement applies; (ii) Land clearing (of GDE-owned land being

used by 23 households for farming) for the construction of power plant will be in accordance

with involuntary resettlement. Principles on involuntary resettlement safeguard of ADB SPS

and prevailing Indonesian legal framework will apply.

5. The project is categorized as B for Involuntary Resettlement in accordance with ADB’s Safeguard Policy Statement (SPS 2009)4 .However, considering the high number of severely

and vulernable APs and the concerns of APs regarding project impacts to their livelihood, the

PMU will engage a qualified external monitoring agency or individual social safeguard

1 Rencana Usaha Penyediaan Tenaga Listrik (RUPTL) 2018–2027 (Electricity Power Supply Business Plan 2018–2027). 2 An increase of 15.32 % vis a vis total potential. 3 Presidential Regulation 148 of 2015 stipulated that land acquisition less than 5 hectare can be undertaken through direct transaction with the land-owners 4 The project is considered category A if 200 or more persons experience major impacts, which are defined as (i) being

physically displaced from housing, or (ii) losing 10% or more of their productive (income generating) assets.

monitoring expert to carry out external monitoring and post-implementation evaluation. The

first external monitoring will be carried out 6 months – 1 year after compensation payment,

while post-resettlement evaluation will be carried out after the completion of livelihood

restoration program.

B. Objective

6. The main objectives of independent monitoring and evaluation are to:

(i) Verify results of internal monitoring.

(ii) Verify the negotiation and settlement process for negotiated land acquisition

(iii) Assess whether resettlement objectives as stated in the resettlement plan

(RP)/updated RP have been met, and if not to suggest corrective measures.

(i) Monitor and evaluate whether land acquisition and involuntary resettlement

activities are implemented in accordance to the RP/Updated RP and d complies

with project resetllement principles/ADB SPS.

(ii) Assess whether the livelihood and the standard of living of affected persons (APs),

including those of the non-titled displaced persons, have been restored or

improved. Special attention needs to be given to the vulnerable groups and

severely AHs. If they were found to be worse off, analysis on the main cause needs

to be done and specific remedial actions need to be proposed.

(iii) Advise GDE on social safeguard compliance issues from the monitoring and how

to resolve them.

C. Scope of Works

7. The EMA will conduct the evaluation study at two times during the project

implementation period: (i) first monitoring conducted 6 months to 1 year after compensation

payment; and (ii) second monitoring after the Livelihood Restoration Plan (LRP) has

completed.The task of the EMA will focus on the resettlement compliance and assessment of

the degree of rehabilitation achieved by the APs in the year following RP implementation. The

EMA will have access to all the offices involved in the implementation of the sub-project RP

and all project documentation. The EMA will conduct the following activities;

a. Review the baseline data, social and economic survey, and related indicators indicated

in the RP/Updated RP.

b. Review the negotiated land acquisition process and verify that negotiations were

conducted in a transparent manner, and that parties involved in the negotiations had

equal bargaining power.

c. Monitor and evaluate whether land acquisition and involuntary resettlement activities

including update of RP, compensation and assistance, mitigations for impacts duting

construction, meaningful consultations and disclosure, GRM, livelihood restoration

program, institutional arrangement including capacity building training, adequacy of

budget, internal monitoring have been timely and properly implemented in a satisfactory

way in line with the project resettlement policy/ADB requirements.

d. Assess the livelihood impact of the land acquisition/resettlement on the APs as well as

non-affected members of the population in the sub-project area. The assessment should

be inclusive of gender concerns.

e. Assess longer term satisfaction with the valuation of assets and entitlements, timing of

payments, fund availability and disbursements

f. Assess the long-term efficiency, effectiveness and sustainability of the land

acquisition/resettlement program, drawing lessons for future resettlement policy

formulation and planning and future RP planning and implementationPreparation of the

evaluation report based on the assessment and incorporate all documents during the

evaluation including meetings/interviews with the APs both men and women, evaluation

instruments, etc.

8. If the findings of the study indicate that the objectives of the RP/Updated RP have not

been achieved, the EMA will propose appropriate additional measures to help the severely

affected APs rehabilitate themselves to at least their pre-project situation. The EMA will

likewise provide recommendations for improving resettlement implementation in the future

D. Methodology

9. The methods for external monitoring activities will consist of the following :

i. Review of internal monitoring reports and other relevant reports.

ii. Review of Detail Measurement Survey (DMS) process to be able to establish a

baseline for monitoring and evaluating project benefits. The EMA to check and

evaluate the DMS process to determine and assess if the DMS activities was carried

out in participatory and transparent manner.

iii. Review of payment vouchers and other forms of compensation disbursed to

APs to ensure full compliance with the requirements of the RP/Updated RP.

iv. Review of socio economic data 5 prepared during the project preparatory technical

assistance (PPTA) and included in the RP/updated RP.

v. Carry out the resettlement survey to all APs to capture their perception or opinion

and suggestions on the land acquisition and involuntary activities and it’s impacts to their living standard. The data will disaggregrate information by gender.

vi. Interview with relevant stakeholders and focus group discussions (FGDs) on specific

topics such as compensation payment, assistance, income restoration programs,

and their satisfaction with current economic activities. Special attention will be paid

to the vulnerable groups: the poor, women, elderly, disable, APs without land title,

and landless. The interview and FGD will also focus on good practices in land

acquisition and involuntary resettlement objectives, approaches and implementation

strategies.

10. Indicators for external monitoring and evaluation as well as verification of negotiated

land acquisition can be seen in the table below

Table 1. Indicators for External Monitoring and Evaluation

Monitoring Indicators Basis for Indicators

1. Basic information on AP households

Location

Composition and structures, ages, education and skill levels

Gender of household head

Ethnic affiliation

Access to health, education, utilities and other social services

Housing type

5 Possible data sources include: census, IOL, socioeconomic survey, village records/documents.

Monitoring Indicators Basis for Indicators

Land use and other resource ownership patterns

Occupation and employment patterns

Income sources and levels

Agricultural production data (for rural households)

Participation in neighborhood or community groups

Access to cultural sites and events

Value of all assets forming entitlements and resettlement entitlements

2. Benefit Monitoring

What changes have occurred in terms of patterns of occupation, production, and resource use compared to the pre-project situation?

What changes have occurred in income and expenditure patterns compared to the pre-project situation?

What have been the changes in cost of living compared to the pre-project situation?

Have APs’ incomes kept pace with these changes?

What changes have taken place in key social and cultural parameters relating to living standards?

3. Restoration of Livelihoods

Were valuations for all types of affected assets based on replacement cost principles

Were compensation payments free of deduction for depreciation, fees or transfer costs to the APs

Were compensation payments sufficient to replace lost assets?

Was sufficient replacement land (of suitable standard) available ?

Did income substitution allow for re-establishment/restoration of livelihoods and living standards/

Were affected public facilities compensated or replaced ?

Have vulnerable groups been provided income-earning opportunities? Are these effective and sustainable?

Do jobs provided restore pre-project income levels and living standards?

4. Levels of AP Satisfaction

How much do APs know about resettlement procedures and entitlements?

Do APs know their entitlements?

Do they know if these have been met?

How much does the APs participate in the public consultation meetings to discuss and reach agreements on project potential impacts, compensation, assistance, and relocation?

How do APs assess the extent to which their own living standards and livelihood have been restored?

How much do APs know about grievance procedures and conflict resolution procedures? How satisfied are those who have used said mechanisms?

5. Effectiveness of Resettlement Planning

Were the APs and their assets correctly enumerated?

Were any land speculators assisted?

Was the time frame and budget sufficient to meet objectives?

Were entitlements too generous?

Were vulnerable groups identified and assisted?

How did resettlement implementers deal with unforeseen problems?

6. Other impacts Were there unintended environmental impacts?

Were there unintended impacts on employment or incomes?

Were there any unintended impacts on Geodipa ?

Table 2. Verification of Negotiation and Settlement Process for Negotiated Land Acquisition

No Principle Criteria Yes No Findings/Remarks

1 Meaningful consultation with the affected persons including those without legal title to assets

Were APs consulted during RP preparation and implementation. If yes, please explain the number of participation and what stage of consultation conducted (planning and implementation).

Did the APs receive clear and adequate information on the project plan and its potential impacts including requirement on land acquisition?

Did the APs know about negotiated land acquisition procedure and their entitlements?

Did the APs participate in the Inventory of Losses carried out by PPTA team and /Detail Measurement Survey (DMS) by GDE Land Acquisition Team (LAT)?

Was there any freedom for APs to express their opinion and suggestions on the project and land acquisition?

Did APs know how to raise the complaints/grievance, if any. Is there any adequate and timely response to the complaint?

Is there any booklet /written information related to project and land acquisition plan and involuntary resettlement distributed to the APs and stakeholders?

Did women participate in the consultations and any attention to the vulnerable groups?

If any land users on the land to be purchases, were they consulted?

2 Offer of adequate and fair price for land and/or other assets. Compensation provided at replacement cost principle

Was compensation rate offered based on valuation by independent appraiser or based on replacement cost principles?

Were compensation payments free of deduction for depreciation, fees or transfer costs to the APs?

Did the APs receive the compensation rate fully soon after the negotiation achieved?

3

Negotiation of compensation with the landowners will be conducted in transparent manner

Was there any negotiation process for compensation rate?

Is there any another option offered for the compensation form, in addition to cash compensation? If yes, please explain?

Has the APs freedom to exit from the negotiation if no agreement on compensation rate achieved?

Did APs know about valuation of compensation rate recommended by appraiser used for the negotiation?

4 Documentation of recording of the process of negotiated land acquisition including consultation activities and negotiation of compensation

Get the copy of all records

Were there any proper records on consultations and other process of land acquisition? Including grievance handling, if any.

Does agreement is properly documented with signatures of APs, name of the borrower/client, and witnesses?

Whether land transactions are support by transfer of tittles?

E. Qualifications/Experience of EMA

11. The PMU shall engage an agency from NGOs, academic institutions, consulting firms,

or individual social safeguard monitoring expert. In case of a Non-Government Organisation,

the institution should be formally registered as an association, foundation or society or other

acceptable form. They should be active on a professional level in the field social safeguards,

with the capacity to provide the scope of work expressed in this TOR in the sub-project

location. The EMA/expert should have prior experience in conducting external resettlement

monitoring or evaluation for development projects. Familiarity with the ADB Safeguards Policy

2009 is a pre-requisite for selection.

F. Key Professional Specialists

12. The EMA/Individual experts for each monitoring will consist of the following

1. Team Leader (Social safeguard or monitoring Specialist) – 2 months

The Team Leader will: (i) provide overall organization and management of the Team and

for supervising the work associated with data collection and analysis (including the

household surveys) and analysis (ii) guide, supervise, and coordinate the work of all team

members (iii) take overall responsibility for preparing reports and consolidating reports

prepared by all team members; (v) liaise communication with the ADB and GDE PMU.

Preferred qualifications of the Team Leader include:

A Master’s degree in social science or economics,

At least 8 years working experience in social safeguards or other relevant field

experience. (Work experience in and familiarity with all aspects of involuntary

resettlement operations would be desirable.)

Experience in working in the government infrastructure construction project,

Proficiency in social impact assessment and implementation of ADB SPS

(Safeguard Policy Statement) and other the international standards of

involuntary resettlement

Able to work independently under minimum supervision

Good analytical skills, interpersonal and teamwork skills, able to manage the

resettlement team of the project that is working with the government

Excellent proficiency in English (oral and writing) and document preparation

2. Resettlement Specialist– 1,5 months

The Resettlement Specialist will work with the Team Leader to support in conducting

monitoring of resettlement process, specifically to conduct social impact analysis of the AHs after the resettlement process.

Preferred qualifications of the Socio-economic Specialist include

A bachelor degree in social sciences or economics.

At least 5 years working experience in social safeguards or other relevant field experience.

Proficiency in social impact assessment and implementation of ADB SPS (Safeguard Policy Statement) and other the international standards of involuntary resettlement

Excellent proficiency in English (oral and writing).

3. A data processing specialist (2 weeks) with at least 3 years in compiling and analyzing

survey data.

G. Reporting

13. The EMA will prepare the following reports to be submitted to the PMU and ADB:

i. Inception Report

Prepare and submit an Inception Report, within 10 days from commencement of

services. This report include monitoring methodology statement and instruments and

implementation time schedule.

ii. Draft External monitoring report/post evaluation report

The draft report includes monitoring/evaluation findings as indicated in the monitoring

objectives and scope of works (para 6 – 7) and recommendations. The draft report is

submitted to GDE and ADB for review

iii. Final External monitoring report/Post-resettlement evaluation report.

The draft report needs to be finalized by incorporating comments/review provided by GDE, ADB, and other relevant parties. The final report is submitted to GDE and ADB for review and acceptance. The accepted report be disclosed on GDE and ADB websites.

Table 2. Tentative Schedule

2020 2021 2022 2023

1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4

Mobilization of EMA X X

Inception Report X X

Draft Reports X X

Final Reports X X