tm 620: quality management session eight – 23 november 2010 control charts, part ii –attributes...

61
TM 620: Quality Management Session Eight – 23 November 2010 • Control Charts, Part II – Attributes – Special Cases

Upload: pamela-carr

Post on 26-Dec-2015

226 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: TM 620: Quality Management Session Eight – 23 November 2010 Control Charts, Part II –Attributes –Special Cases

TM 620: Quality Management

Session Eight – 23 November 2010

• Control Charts, Part II– Attributes– Special Cases

Page 2: TM 620: Quality Management Session Eight – 23 November 2010 Control Charts, Part II –Attributes –Special Cases

Shewhart’s Assumptions

• The data generated by the process when it is in control:– Are normally distributed– Are independent– Have a mean and standard deviation that are

fixed and unknown

Page 3: TM 620: Quality Management Session Eight – 23 November 2010 Control Charts, Part II –Attributes –Special Cases

Data on Quality Characteristics

• Attribute data– Discrete– Often a count of some type

• Variable data– Continuous– Often a measurement, such as length,

voltage, or viscosity

Page 4: TM 620: Quality Management Session Eight – 23 November 2010 Control Charts, Part II –Attributes –Special Cases

Control Chart Concept MapQuality Characteristic

Q-Sum Chart

n>10

n >1

Sm. shfts

X, Moving R

type of attribute

ni = n

p, np

ni = n

c

pvar u

X, S

X, R

no

yes

no

yes

yes

no

variable attribute

defective defects

yes yes

no no

Page 5: TM 620: Quality Management Session Eight – 23 November 2010 Control Charts, Part II –Attributes –Special Cases

Names for Abnormalities

• Variable data– Defective

• Attribute data– Nonconforming– Does the item meet the requirements on one

or more quality characteristics

Page 6: TM 620: Quality Management Session Eight – 23 November 2010 Control Charts, Part II –Attributes –Special Cases

Charts for Attributes

• Fraction nonconforming (p-chart)– Fixed sample size– Variable sample size

• np-chart for number nonconforming

• Charts for defects– c-chart– u-chart

Page 7: TM 620: Quality Management Session Eight – 23 November 2010 Control Charts, Part II –Attributes –Special Cases

Fraction Nonconforming

• The ratio of the number of nonconforming items in a population to the total number of items in the population– These items may have several quality

characteristics simultaneously inspected

Page 8: TM 620: Quality Management Session Eight – 23 November 2010 Control Charts, Part II –Attributes –Special Cases

pp

The P-Chart

ppUCL 3

ppLCL 3where

pd

nm

ii

m

1p

n

( )1

Page 9: TM 620: Quality Management Session Eight – 23 November 2010 Control Charts, Part II –Attributes –Special Cases
Page 10: TM 620: Quality Management Session Eight – 23 November 2010 Control Charts, Part II –Attributes –Special Cases
Page 11: TM 620: Quality Management Session Eight – 23 November 2010 Control Charts, Part II –Attributes –Special Cases

Example; P-Chart

• Operators of a sorting machine must read the zip code on a letter and diver the letter to the proper carrier route. Over one month’s time, 25 samples of 100 letters were chosen, and the number of errors was recorded. Error counts for each of the 25 days follows.

Page 12: TM 620: Quality Management Session Eight – 23 November 2010 Control Charts, Part II –Attributes –Special Cases

Example

Day Error %Defect Day Error %Defect1 3 0.03 14 2 0.022 1 0.01 15 3 0.033 0 0.00 16 3 0.034 0 0.00 17 2 0.025 2 0.02 18 0 0.006 3 0.03 19 1 0.017 5 0.05 20 5 0.058 2 0.02 21 4 0.049 4 0.04 22 3 0.0310 3 0.03 23 2 0.0211 0 0.00 24 4 0.0412 1 0.01 25 3 0.0313 4 0.04

Page 13: TM 620: Quality Management Session Eight – 23 November 2010 Control Charts, Part II –Attributes –Special Cases

Example

2503....00.01.03. p = 0.024

Page 14: TM 620: Quality Management Session Eight – 23 November 2010 Control Charts, Part II –Attributes –Special Cases

Example

2503....00.01.03. p

pp p

070.0100

)024.1(024.3024.

)1(3

nUCLp

= 0.024

Page 15: TM 620: Quality Management Session Eight – 23 November 2010 Control Charts, Part II –Attributes –Special Cases

Example

p pp0.0022.

)1( n

LCLp 3

2503....00.01.03. p

pp p

070.0100

)024.1(024.3024.

)1(3

nUCLp

= 0.024

Page 16: TM 620: Quality Management Session Eight – 23 November 2010 Control Charts, Part II –Attributes –Special Cases

Example; P-Chart

P-Chart; Mail Sort

-0.02

0.00

0.02

0.04

0.06

0.08

0 10 20 30

Day

% E

rro

rs

Page 17: TM 620: Quality Management Session Eight – 23 November 2010 Control Charts, Part II –Attributes –Special Cases

Variable P-Charts Idea

• Recall,

• For different sample size, compute CL for each sample

pppCL

n

3

1( )

pppCL

ni

i

31( )

Page 18: TM 620: Quality Management Session Eight – 23 November 2010 Control Charts, Part II –Attributes –Special Cases
Page 19: TM 620: Quality Management Session Eight – 23 November 2010 Control Charts, Part II –Attributes –Special Cases
Page 20: TM 620: Quality Management Session Eight – 23 November 2010 Control Charts, Part II –Attributes –Special Cases

Sample ni Di pi

p LCL UCL

1 100 12 0.120 0.0299 0.0095 0.18872 80 8 0.100 0.0334 -0.0011 0.19933 80 7 0.088 0.0334 -0.0011 0.19934 100 9 0.090 0.0299 0.0095 0.18875 110 10 0.091 0.0285 0.0136 0.18456 110 12 0.109 0.0285 0.0136 0.18457 100 9 0.090 0.0299 0.0095 0.18878 100 10 0.100 0.0299 0.0095 0.18879 90 10 0.111 0.0315 0.0046 0.193610 90 8 0.089 0.0315 0.0046 0.193611 110 12 0.109 0.0285 0.0136 0.184512 120 11 0.092 0.0273 0.0173 0.180913 100 10 0.100 0.0299 0.0095 0.188714 90 8 0.089 0.0315 0.0046 0.193615 110 12 0.109 0.0285 0.0136 0.1845

Sum = 1490 148p bar = 0.099

Page 21: TM 620: Quality Management Session Eight – 23 November 2010 Control Charts, Part II –Attributes –Special Cases

Variable Size P Chart

Variable Size P Chart

-0.050

0.000

0.050

0.100

0.150

0.200

0.250

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16

Time

% D

efe

ctiv

e

Page 22: TM 620: Quality Management Session Eight – 23 November 2010 Control Charts, Part II –Attributes –Special Cases

Number Nonconforming

• np-chart

• Many non-statistically trained people find the np chart easier to interpret that the p-chart

Page 23: TM 620: Quality Management Session Eight – 23 November 2010 Control Charts, Part II –Attributes –Special Cases

The np Control Chart

• UCL =

• CL = np

• LCL =

)1(3 pnpnp

)1(3 pnpnp

Page 24: TM 620: Quality Management Session Eight – 23 November 2010 Control Charts, Part II –Attributes –Special Cases
Page 25: TM 620: Quality Management Session Eight – 23 November 2010 Control Charts, Part II –Attributes –Special Cases
Page 26: TM 620: Quality Management Session Eight – 23 November 2010 Control Charts, Part II –Attributes –Special Cases

C - Chart

• p chart shows % of parts that are defective in a lot

• np chart shows # parts defective in a lot• Suppose more than one defect can occur

in a particular part• C-chart shows # defects in a given lot

– based on the Poisson– subgroup size constant > 25

Page 27: TM 620: Quality Management Session Eight – 23 November 2010 Control Charts, Part II –Attributes –Special Cases

Poisson

• Distribution of rare events

• Idea: let c = # defectsc

c x

E X[ ]

x

p xe

x

x

( )!

Page 28: TM 620: Quality Management Session Eight – 23 November 2010 Control Charts, Part II –Attributes –Special Cases

Poisson Distribution

• Idea: let c = # defects

Control Limits c c 3

c

c x

Page 29: TM 620: Quality Management Session Eight – 23 November 2010 Control Charts, Part II –Attributes –Special Cases

ExampleSample # Defects LCL UCL

1 2 0 9.772 4 0 9.773 3 0 9.774 5 0 9.775 2 0 9.776 3 0 9.777 5 0 9.778 4 0 9.779 3 0 9.7710 6 0 9.7711 3 0 9.7712 3 0 9.7713 6 0 9.7714 5 0 9.7715 4 0 9.77

c bar = 3.867

Page 30: TM 620: Quality Management Session Eight – 23 November 2010 Control Charts, Part II –Attributes –Special Cases

Example

C - Chart

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16

Time

De

fect

s

Page 31: TM 620: Quality Management Session Eight – 23 November 2010 Control Charts, Part II –Attributes –Special Cases
Page 32: TM 620: Quality Management Session Eight – 23 November 2010 Control Charts, Part II –Attributes –Special Cases
Page 33: TM 620: Quality Management Session Eight – 23 November 2010 Control Charts, Part II –Attributes –Special Cases

U - Chart

• Like the c - chart, except it removes the restriction of equal sample sizes

uc c c

n n nk

k

1 2

1 2

...

...

uS nui i /

u uControl Limits ni i 3 /

Page 34: TM 620: Quality Management Session Eight – 23 November 2010 Control Charts, Part II –Attributes –Special Cases

ExampleSample # Defects Sample SizeDefects/Unit LCL UCL

1 2 100 0.020 0 0.102 4 80 0.050 0 0.113 3 90 0.033 0 0.104 5 105 0.048 0 0.105 2 95 0.021 0 0.106 3 85 0.035 0 0.117 5 100 0.050 0 0.108 4 105 0.038 0 0.109 3 90 0.033 0 0.1010 6 105 0.057 0 0.1011 3 110 0.027 0 0.1012 3 85 0.035 0 0.1113 6 95 0.063 0 0.1014 5 100 0.050 0 0.1015 4 90 0.044 0 0.10

Sum = 58 1435u bar = 0.040

Page 35: TM 620: Quality Management Session Eight – 23 November 2010 Control Charts, Part II –Attributes –Special Cases

Example

U - Chart

0.000

0.020

0.040

0.060

0.080

0.100

0.120

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16

Time

De

fect

s p

er

Un

it

Page 36: TM 620: Quality Management Session Eight – 23 November 2010 Control Charts, Part II –Attributes –Special Cases
Page 37: TM 620: Quality Management Session Eight – 23 November 2010 Control Charts, Part II –Attributes –Special Cases
Page 38: TM 620: Quality Management Session Eight – 23 November 2010 Control Charts, Part II –Attributes –Special Cases

CUSUM Chart

• X-bar, R charts work well to detect significant shifts in the mean (1.5 - 2.0)

• However, suppose we wish to detect smaller shifts in the process

• Consider a piston ring process with target value at 10.0 cm.– First 10 sampled at normal with = 10– Second 10 sampled at normal with = 11– Control limits computed at LCL = 7, UCL = 13

Page 39: TM 620: Quality Management Session Eight – 23 November 2010 Control Charts, Part II –Attributes –Special Cases

ExampleTarget = 10.0Sample x LCL UCL

1 9.45 7.00 13.002 7.99 7.00 13.003 9.29 7.00 13.004 11.66 7.00 13.005 12.16 7.00 13.006 10.18 7.00 13.007 8.04 7.00 13.008 11.46 7.00 13.009 9.20 7.00 13.0010 10.34 7.00 13.0011 10.90 7.00 13.0012 9.33 7.00 13.0013 12.29 7.00 13.0014 11.50 7.00 13.0015 10.60 7.00 13.0016 11.08 7.00 13.0017 10.38 7.00 13.0018 11.62 7.00 13.0019 11.31 7.00 13.0020 10.52 7.00 13.00

Page 40: TM 620: Quality Management Session Eight – 23 November 2010 Control Charts, Part II –Attributes –Special Cases

Example

X bar Chart

0.002.004.006.008.00

10.0012.0014.00

0 5 10 15 20 25

Time

Me

an

Page 41: TM 620: Quality Management Session Eight – 23 November 2010 Control Charts, Part II –Attributes –Special Cases

CUSUM Idea

• Show the cumulative effects of relatively small changes

i

xCi jj

o ( )

1

xxi o jj

i

o

( ) ( )1

1

x Ci o i ( ) 1

Page 42: TM 620: Quality Management Session Eight – 23 November 2010 Control Charts, Part II –Attributes –Special Cases

Example, CUSUM TableTarget = 10.0Sample x x - Ci = (x-)+Ci-1

1 9.45 -0.55 -0.552 7.99 -2.01 -2.563 9.29 -0.71 -3.274 11.66 1.66 -1.615 12.16 2.16 0.556 10.18 0.18 0.737 8.04 -1.96 -1.238 11.46 1.46 0.239 9.20 -0.80 -0.5710 10.34 0.34 -0.2311 10.90 0.90 0.6712 9.33 -0.67 0.0013 12.29 2.29 2.2914 11.50 1.50 3.7915 10.60 0.60 4.3916 11.08 1.08 5.4717 10.38 0.38 5.8518 11.62 1.62 7.4719 11.31 1.31 8.7820 10.52 0.52 9.30

Page 43: TM 620: Quality Management Session Eight – 23 November 2010 Control Charts, Part II –Attributes –Special Cases

Example; CUSUM Chart

Q - Sum Chart

-4.00

-2.00

0.00

2.00

4.00

6.00

8.00

10.00

0 5 10 15 20 25

Time

Cu

mu

lati

ve

Page 44: TM 620: Quality Management Session Eight – 23 November 2010 Control Charts, Part II –Attributes –Special Cases

Questions to Ask When Implementing Control Charts

• Which process characteristics to control• Where the charts should be implemented in the

process• What is the proper type of control chart for your

process• What mechanisms are there to take action

based on the analysis of the control charts• What data collection systems and computer

software should be used

Page 45: TM 620: Quality Management Session Eight – 23 November 2010 Control Charts, Part II –Attributes –Special Cases

Control Chart Design Issues

• Basis for sampling

• Sample size

• Frequency of sampling

• Location of control limits

Page 46: TM 620: Quality Management Session Eight – 23 November 2010 Control Charts, Part II –Attributes –Special Cases
Page 47: TM 620: Quality Management Session Eight – 23 November 2010 Control Charts, Part II –Attributes –Special Cases

SPC Implementation Requirements

• Top management commitment

• Project champion

• Initial workable project

• Employee education and training

• Accurate measurement system

Page 48: TM 620: Quality Management Session Eight – 23 November 2010 Control Charts, Part II –Attributes –Special Cases

Example: Catalog Company

• A catalog distributer ships a variety of orders each day. The packing slips often contain errors such as wrong purchase order numbers, wrong quantities, or incorrect sizes. The data on the next slide was collected during the month of August.

• What type of chart should you use to analyze this data?

Page 49: TM 620: Quality Management Session Eight – 23 November 2010 Control Charts, Part II –Attributes –Special Cases

1 8 922 15 693 6 864 13 855 5 1236 5 877 3 748 8 839 4 103

10 6 6011 7 13612 4 8013 2 7014 11 7315 13 8916 6 12917 6 7818 3 8819 8 7620 9 10121 8 9222 2 7023 9 5424 5 8325 13 16526 5 13727 8 7928 6 7629 7 14730 4 8031 8 78

DayNumber of

DefectsSample

Size

Page 50: TM 620: Quality Management Session Eight – 23 November 2010 Control Charts, Part II –Attributes –Special Cases

Attribute (u) Chart

0.0000

0.0500

0.1000

0.1500

0.2000

0.2500

1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 49

Sample number

De

fec

ts p

er

un

itDefects per unit

Low er control limitUpper control limit

Center line

Page 51: TM 620: Quality Management Session Eight – 23 November 2010 Control Charts, Part II –Attributes –Special Cases

Example: Machine Breakdowns

• The number of machine breakdowns for a particular process are tracked per day over a 25 day period. The results are on the next slide.

• What type of chart should you use to analyze this data?

Page 52: TM 620: Quality Management Session Eight – 23 November 2010 Control Charts, Part II –Attributes –Special Cases

Day Breakdowns1 22 33 04 15 36 57 38 19 2

10 211 012 113 014 215 416 117 218 019 3220 221 122 423 024 025 3

Page 53: TM 620: Quality Management Session Eight – 23 November 2010 Control Charts, Part II –Attributes –Special Cases

Attribute (c) Chart

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 49

Sample number

Nu

mb

er

of

de

fec

tsNumber of defectsLower control limitUpper control limitCenter line

Page 54: TM 620: Quality Management Session Eight – 23 November 2010 Control Charts, Part II –Attributes –Special Cases

Example: Silicon Wafer Production

• The thickness of silicon wafers used in the production of semiconductors must be carefully controlled. The tolerance of one such product is specified as ±0.0050 inches. In one production facility, three wafers were selected each hour and the thickness measured carefully to within one ten-thousandth of an inch.

• What type of chart should you use to analyze this data?

Page 55: TM 620: Quality Management Session Eight – 23 November 2010 Control Charts, Part II –Attributes –Special Cases

Sample Obs. 1 Obs. 2 Obs. 31 41 70 222 78 53 683 84 34 484 60 36 255 46 47 296 64 16 567 43 53 648 37 43 309 50 29 57

10 57 83 3211 24 42 3912 78 48 3913 51 57 5014 41 29 3515 56 64 3616 46 41 1617 99 86 9818 71 54 3919 41 2 5320 41 39 3621 22 40 4622 63 70 4623 64 52 5724 44 38 6025 41 63 62

Page 56: TM 620: Quality Management Session Eight – 23 November 2010 Control Charts, Part II –Attributes –Special Cases

X-bar Chart

0

20

40

60

80

100

1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 49

Sample number

Av

era

ge

s

AveragesLower control limitUpper control limitCenter line

R-Chart

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 49

Sample number

Ra

ng

es

RangesLower control limitUpper control limitCenter line

Page 57: TM 620: Quality Management Session Eight – 23 November 2010 Control Charts, Part II –Attributes –Special Cases

Example: Orange Juice

• Frozen orange juice concentrate is packed in 6-oz. cardboard cans. These cans are formed on a machine by spinning them from cardboard stock and attaching a metal bottom panel. By inspection of a can, we may determine whether, when filled, it could possibly leak either on the side seam or around the bottom joint. Thirty samples of fifty cans each were selected at half-hour intervals over a three shift period in which the machine was in continuous operation.

• What type of chart should you use to analyze this data?

Page 58: TM 620: Quality Management Session Eight – 23 November 2010 Control Charts, Part II –Attributes –Special Cases

Sample Number of Errors1 122 153 84 105 46 77 168 99 14

10 1011 512 613 1714 1215 22

16 817 1018 519 1320 1121 2022 1823 2424 1525 926 1227 728 1329 930 6

Page 59: TM 620: Quality Management Session Eight – 23 November 2010 Control Charts, Part II –Attributes –Special Cases

Attribute (p) Chart

0.0000

0.1000

0.2000

0.3000

0.4000

0.5000

0.6000

1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 49

Sample number

Fra

cti

on

no

nc

on

form

ing

Fraction nonconformingLower control limitCenter lineUpper control limit

Page 60: TM 620: Quality Management Session Eight – 23 November 2010 Control Charts, Part II –Attributes –Special Cases

Number nonconforming (np) chart

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 49

Sample number

Nu

mb

er

no

nc

on

form

ing

Number nonconformingLower control limitUpper control limitCenter line

Page 61: TM 620: Quality Management Session Eight – 23 November 2010 Control Charts, Part II –Attributes –Special Cases

Next Class

• Homework– Ch. 11 (12) Problems 13, 14, 21– Ch. 12 (13) Problems 16, 21, 22

• Topic– Six Sigma, FMEA, Reliability

• Preparation– Chapter 15 and Handout