國立巨治大學國弽掖展研究屻 碩士棄文 指導慡授:李酉潭 博士 民...
Post on 30-Aug-2019
7 views
Embed Size (px)
TRANSCRIPT
Na
t iona l Chengch i U
nive
rsi t
y
I
102 7
Na
t iona l Chengch i U
nive
rsi t
y
II
Na
t iona l Chengch i U
nive
rsi t
y
III
RI-1999
RI-2003
Na
t iona l Chengch i U
nive
rsi t
y
IV
Abstract
The purpose of this research is to understand the power relationship between
husbands and wives, including the factors and the transition during 1999-2003 within
the process of Taiwans democratization, especially the context of culture. Researcher
adopts family decision-making as an important index. Base on the resources theory,
the exchange theory and the theory of resources in culture context, the main
questions of this research are: 1. Does the proportion of family decision-making
change? 2. The situation that the more resources one has, the more power in making
decision one has would increase.
The results are as follows. The proportion of family decision-making does not
change significantly, however, the situation that one has more resources would have
more power in making decision does increase. Nevertheless, the research tells us
that some personal characteristics like ones ethnic group, do not have the same
result as research in past. How will Taiwans democratization influence these factors,
or change their nature in the process of decision-making? That could be a good
research direction in the future.
Key words: Taiwan, democratization, the power of husbands and wives, family
decision-making, resources differences
Na
t iona l Chengch i U
nive
rsi t
y
V
1
1
3
4
4
7
10
15
15
16
18
22
22
28
49
53
Na
t iona l Chengch i U
nive
rsi t
y
VI
60
60
61
75
75
Na
t iona l Chengch i U
nive
rsi t
y
VII
1 15
1 6
2 RI-1999RI-2003 22
3 RI-1999RI-2003 23
4 RI-1999RI-2003 24
5 RI-1999RI-2003 25
6 RI-1999RI-2003 26
7 27
8 RI-1999RI-2003 28
9 RI-1999RI-2003 29
10 RI-1999RI-2003 30
11 RI-1999RI-2003 31
12 RI-1999RI-2003 32
13 RI-1999RI-2003 34
14 RI-1999RI-2003 34
15 RI-1999RI-2003 35
16 RI-1999RI-2003 42
Na
t iona l Chengch i U
nive
rsi t
y
VIII
17 RI-1999RI-2003 42
18 RI-1999RI-2003 43
Na
t iona l Chengch i U
nive
rsi t
y
1
2011 6 24
2008
1
1996
20
only game in townLinz1990158
Freedom House
1996 politic rights
civil liberties 2005-2006
1 1
Larry Diamond
1 2011 6 24
http://www.chinareviewnews.com/crn-webapp/doc/docDetailCreate.jsp?coluid=98&kindid=2994&docid=101
743877
http://www.chinareviewnews.com/crn-webapp/doc/docDetailCreate.jsp?coluid=98&kindid=2994&docid=101743877http://www.chinareviewnews.com/crn-webapp/doc/docDetailCreate.jsp?coluid=98&kindid=2994&docid=101743877Na
t iona l Chengch i U
nive
rsi t
y
2
Diamond
Diamond
1999171-174
(family decision-making) David Easton
instrumental
affectiveeconomic
social
1999
Na
t iona l Chengch i U
nive
rsi t
y
3
2008
RI-1999
RI-2000RI-2003RCI-2004RCI-2005
RCI-2007
Na
t iona l Chengch i U
nive
rsi t
y
4
democracydemos
kratosrule by the peopleSorensen1993
16
Joseph A.
Schumpeter
Sorensen199310-12 Samuel P. Huntington
Huntington19915-13
Huntington Schumpeter
Larry Diamond electoral
democracyminimalistDiamond1996
21
ODonnell and Schmitter19868
Karl199622
Robert A. Dahl polyarchy
Na
t iona l Chengch i U
nive
rsi t
y
5
Dahl19711-32(1)
(2)(3)(4)
(5)(6)(7)
Dahl1989221
201136
Sorensen Dahl
competitionparticipationliberties
Sorensen199313Diamond liberal democracy
Diamond199621
Alexis de Tocqueville
Bova
1997112-116
Na
t iona l Chengch i U
nive
rsi t
y
6
Dahl
1-1 7-7
7-71-1
Sorensen200320-21 1
1
1-7 1-7
1-2.5
3-5.5
5.5-7
McColm, R. Bruce (1991). The Comparative Survey of Freedom: 1991. Freedom
Review, 22(1), 14.
1972
2
2
Sorensen200321-25
Na
t iona l Chengch i U
nive
rsi t
y
7
Robert O. Blood and
Donald M. Wolfe 1960 Husband and Wives
2000
2005Chen and Yi2006
R. E. Cromwell and D. H. Olson1975
baseprocess
outcome
J. M. Steil1997
1989
Na
t iona l Chengch i U
nive
rsi t
y
8
1989
115-116 Sarah F. Berk1985
Mirowsky1985
1991
1989
2000
final say
20052008
Blood and Wolfe1960
Richard Centers, Bertram H. Raven and Aroldo Rodrigues1971
Constantina Safilios-Rothschild1970
1989121
javascript:;Na
t iona l Chengch i U
nive
rsi t
y
9
Blood and Wolfe1960husband dominant
typewife dominant typeequalitarian of syncretic
typeautonomic type
1989
Eshleman1981
Blood and Wolfe1960
1987188
Na
t iona l Chengch i U
nive
rsi t
y
10
feminism
Gender MainstreamingGM
stakeholders
200933-34
gender parity
1995 1996
2000
Na
t iona l Chengch i U
nive
rsi t
y
11
2006
1.
1989
3
2.
1990
1996
2002
1993
20072002
3.
3 1995
1999 500 41
2000
http://taiwanpedia.culture.tw/web/content?ID=1002412013/9/10
http://taiwanpedia.culture.tw/web/content?ID=100241Na
t iona l Chengch i U
nive
rsi t
y
12
2002
20072007
2006
Olson and DeFrain2003213
Warner et al.1986Mirowsky
1985
4
1.
Blood and Wolfe
1960
1984
4 2005
48http://mail.nhu.edu.tw/~society/e-j/48/48-45.htm
http://mail.nhu.edu.tw/~society/e-j/48/48-45.htmNa
t iona l Chengch i U
nive
rsi t
y
13
1989
19972003 Hyman
Rodman 1967 1972
2.
the principle of least interestOlson and DeFrain2003
3.
rewardcost
Investment modelEquity
theoryOutcome-interdependence theory
Sprecher1998
rewardscosts Mirowsky1985
McDonald1980
Na
t iona l Chengch i U
nive
rsi t
y
14
Whyte1995
Rodman1970
Wesley R. Burr1973
5
5 2008
http://www.npf.org.tw/post/1/86732013/8/22
http://www.npf.org.tw/post/1/8673Na
t iona l Chengch i U
nive
rsi t
y
15
1
1
Na
t iona l Chengch i U
nive
rsi t
y
16
Panel Study of Family
Dynamics PSFD
(panel)
6
6
1998
() ()
Gary Becker (Chicago)Angus Deaton
(Princeton)Robert Hauser (Wisconsin) Cheng Hsiao (USC)Ronald Lee (Berkeley)William Parish
(Chicago) George Tiao (Chicago) James Vaupel (Max Plank) Arthur Wolf (Stanford)
1999
Na
t iona l Chengch i U
nive
rsi t
y
17
PSFD
1000
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
RI-1999RI-2003
https://psfd.sinica.edu.tw/plan_01.htm
https://psfd.sinica.edu.tw/plan_01.htmNa
t iona l Chengch i U
nive
rsi t
y
18
PSFD 1999
1996 RI-1999
RI-2003
7
PSFD
1989
PSFD
7 Huntington
two-turnover test
Huntington1991266-267
Huntington
Huntington19911082000
RI-2003
1996 2000
Na
t iona l Chengch i U
nive
rsi t
y
19
200016-17
PSFD
2005
2000
20072004
Bielby1984
PSFD
Na
t iona l Chengch i U
nive
rsi t
y
20
2006261PSFD
200018
50000 5000-50000
5000 5000-50