tshare s&v d ocument theand the pilot share... · tshare s&v d ocument theand the pilot...
TRANSCRIPT
SHARE S&V D tSHARE S&V Document and theand the
PilotPathway into the Future for Standards Development andStandards Development and Delivery
April 2010
Bron W. Kisler, CDISC Senior Directorbki l @ di
11
CDISC Mission
T d l d t l b l l tf
CDISC Mission
To develop and support global, platform-independent data standards that enable i f i i biliinformation system interoperability to
improve medical research and related areas of healthcare
Strength through collaboration.
22
CDISC SnapshotCDISC Snapshot
�• Global standards organization initiated in 1997 as a gvolunteer group; incorporated as non-profit in 2000
�• Established worldwide standards to support the electronic acquisition exchange analysis andelectronic acquisition, exchange, analysis and submission of clinical research data
�• 200+ corporate sponsors and member organizations p p g(Global Pharmas, Service Organizations, Technology Vendors, Academic Institutions)
�• Established Coordinating Committees and annual�• Established Coordinating Committees and annual events in North America, Europe and Japan
�• Expanding activities in China, India and BrazilExpanding activities in China, India and Brazil�• Liaison A organization to ISO TC-215; member of
Joint Initiative Council
33
CDISC Standards and Data Flow
44
Opening Remarks by CDISC Chair, Dr Edward Helton (SHARE presentation Oct 2009)Dr. Edward Helton (SHARE presentation Oct. 2009)
�• The Clinical Data Interchange Standards Consortium (CDISC)The Clinical Data Interchange Standards Consortium (CDISC) is a global standards development organization.
�• CDISC has developed a suite of standards to support the li i l h f l iclinical research process from protocol representation
through analysis and reporting, with a focus to date on safety data domains.y
�• These encompass protocol-driven research, including regulated research.CDISC d it b t dditi l t t t d d�• CDISC and its members want additional content standards (to support efficacy, eligibility, clinical content) to be developed more rapidly.
�• CDISC standards are open and freely available (www.cdisc.org)
55
What is CDISC SHARE?What is CDISC SHARE?
A globally accessible electronic library built on a common information modelbuilt on a common information model, which (through advanced technology) enables precise and standardised dataenables precise and standardised data element definitions that can be used in
studies and applications to improve biomedical research and it�’s link with
healthcare
66
Why SHARE?Why SHARE?�• Integrate current CDISC standards and extend them
i h ffi l d d i / d hwith efficacy-related domains / content and other needed standards in an electronic, accessible format
�• Help to ensure terminology for research standards is�• Help to ensure terminology for research standards is consistent as much as possible with that needed for other purposes (e.g. EHRs, quality reporting, public p p ( g , q y p g, phealth, safety monitoring)
�• Strengthen the link between clinical care and research h h h l i f h l hsuch that research results can inform healthcare more
quickly�• Develop a �‘reference�’ or target set of standards�• Develop a reference or target set of standards
without duplication of existing standards (e.g. target for mapping legacy/retrospective data)
77
pp g g y p )
SHARE Project: Inception Phase(M h D b 2009)(March �– December 2009)
�• Goal: Evaluate feasibility; determine future pathGoal: Evaluate feasibility; determine future path
�• Scope & Vision Document�– Business RequirementsBusiness Requirements
�– Governance Process, Workflow and Requirements
�– Detailed Stakeholder Assessment
�– Business Models
�• Pilot �– Technology and tools (Mayo/NCI LexGrid)
�– Terminologies and vocabularies for harmonization (n=7)
�– New/comparable content (Oncology) from 5 sources (Mayo, MD Anderson, GSK, Genzyme, Lilly)
�– Evaluation and Metrics (Pilot Report January 2010)
88
( p y )
CDISC SHARE: ContributeCDISC SHARE: Contribute
Within an organization the extraction andWithin an organization the extraction and formatting of existing definitions for loading
into the CDISC SHARE environment.
Pilot used an excel spreadsheet
Also used a Lilly ODM file exported fromAlso used a Lilly ODM file exported from their internal system, which was then converted to Excel spreadsheet form
99
p
CDISC SHARE: LinkCDISC SHARE: Link
Attempt to align an organization�’sAttempt to align an organization s internal world with the outside world
BRIDG & CDISC NCIt & M tNCIt & MetaSNOMED CT
UCUM, ICD 10
Cloud of Knowledge1010
Cloud of Knowledge
CDISC SHARE: Mergeg
Org A
BRIDG & CDISC NCIt & MetaNCIt & MetaSNOMED CT C C 0Org B UCUM, ICD 10 Org B
Org COrg C
By using the links the �“machine�” can
1111
By using the links the machine can group similar source definitions
CDISC SHARE: Harmonize
...
...
Group like data elements and definitions b itt d b diff t i ti dsubmitted by different organizations and
worked on by the community to align and agree to the consensus version.
1212
to the consensus version.
CDISC SHARE: Harmonize
Value Set = A,B,C, ,
Value Set = X,Y
Value Set = A,X,Y
Value Set = N M O P Q RValue Set = N,M,O,P,Q,R
Value Set = ???Value Set = ???
Align value sets. Source these from standard gterminologies if possible.
1313
Harmonize �– �“Clumps�”p
...
...Relationship between the element definitionselement definitions
Form �“logical�” groupings (e.g. BP = SYSBP, DIABP B d L i B d P i i )
1414
DIABP, Body Location, Body Position etc.)
New DefinitionNew Definition
L N�• Long Name�• Short Name�• Definition�• Data Type�• Data Type�• Value Set�• Concepts Linked To�• Sources of Definition
1515
Pilot AimsPilot Aims�• Primary
�– Determine whether definitions taken from multiple sources can be merged into a single reference version agreed to by
ll ti d thi b d ithi ti f th tall parties, and can this be done within a timeframe that makes business sense
Determine whether high quality definitions can be created�– Determine whether high-quality definitions can be created, and can existing ontologies help in ensuring such while avoiding duplicate definitions from being createdg p g
�• SecondaryProvide any relevant lessons to future development work�– Provide any relevant lessons to future development work
�– Refine user, business and governance requirements
1616
CDISC: Focus on Standard Content
CDISC Partners Software
CDISC: Focus on Standard Content
CDISC Partners( Technology )
Software
Hosting
CDISC
Inception
ElaborationCDISC& Collaborators( Content )
ConstructionTransition Production
1717
( Content )
CDISC: Focus on Standard ContentNCI �– tool development
CDISC: Focus on Standard Contentp
Technologygy�• Servers, Repository, Software , etc. = NCI�• Hosting = Central and/or Federated
CDISC / Content = CDISC and CollaboratorsContent Governance = CDISC and Collaborators
CDISC / Stakeholder
RequirementsBusiness Model and Funding�• CDISC - Core Standards�• External - Therapeutic Area Standards
CDISC SHARE �– content
1818
C ISC SHAR content
NCI Partnership�• NCI has produced and hosted CDISC terminology through
it E t i V b l S i (EVS) i l 2003
NCI Partnership
its Enterprise Vocabulary Services (EVS) since early 2003�• NCI also produces and hosts terminologies for FDA, NIH,
and a broad array of research and healthcare organizations y gnationally and internationally through EVS
�• NCI is migrating to new tools for semantic management including a next generation metadata repository (MDR)including a next generation metadata repository (MDR)
�• NCI has offered to include all CDISC SHARE requirements in its repository development process
�• NCI has requested direct CDISC participation in the development teamNCI i h t t t l f CDISC SHARE th t ill b�• NCI wishes to support tools for CDISC SHARE that will be customizable, global, and cover all therapeutic areas
1919
Margaret Haber, NCI EVS
NCI Partnership (2)NCI Partnership (2)�• NCI�’s MDR development will be based requirements from a
id i t f t i l d h d b dwide variety of groups to include research and broader healthcare standards; SDOs - HL7, CDISC and other; regulatory entities; pharmaceutical; providers and vendorsregulatory entities; pharmaceutical; providers and vendors
�• The new ISO 11179 standard MDR will be based on a federated distributed architecture; meaning it will befederated, distributed architecture; meaning it will be decentralized, allowing for multiple peer repositories
�• A platform independent model, to be openly shareableA platform independent model, to be openly shareable
�• Allows for modular development of many and varied customized applications and services for different users, but customized applications and services for different users, but with a common foundation and generic API
�• Open, Platform & Vendor Neutral, Distributable, Shareable
2020
p , f , ,Margaret Haber, NCI EVS
Why Partner with NCI?Why Partner with NCI?�• Proven terminology partnership with rapid turn-around
service and support for accelerating standards timelines
�• Reliable and globally accessible Best-of-Breed infrastructure for standards publication (DE�’s, Terminology, DAMs)
�• Ability to �“harmonize�” real-time with key partners without tl t d d icostly standards mapping
�• NCI plans align well with CDISC�’s mission as well as near and long term strategy (e g new disease areas)long-term strategy (e.g. new disease areas)
�• Offer to roll-in requirements (CDISC, HL7 CIC, others) and to provide extensive resources and expertise is unprecedentedprovide extensive resources and expertise is unprecedented
�• Open, Platform & Vendor Neutral, Distributable, Shareable where all CDISC standards can be aligned and published
2121
where all CDISC standards can be aligned and published
NCI-EVS NCIt content stakeholdersNCI
ACC1%
BioCARTA0%
caDSR1%
CDC1%
CRCHNCI-GLOSS RAND
SEER1% Swiss-Prot
3%UCUM
0%
Terminology SubsetsNCIFDA
CTCAECTRM_ID
CDISC 0%
CDISC6%
CRCH1%
NCI GLOSS3%
RAND1%
3%CDISC
NCI-GLOSS
Swiss-ProtCDC
CTCAE9%
DCP
CDCDCPDTP
CRCHACC
CTRM_ID6%
DCP1%
DICOM1%
DTP
ACCcaDSRDICOM
HL7ICH
1%
FDA
NCI Only42%
ICHICSRISOJAX
KEGG ID FDA19%
HL7
_MTHRANDSEER
BioCARTA
2222
HL71%ICH
1%ICSR1%
ISO1%
JAX1%
KEGG_ID1%
MTH1%
UCUM
NCI EVS T i l S iNCI-EVS Terminology Services
�• Subject Matter Expertise
�• Definition writing and analysis
�• Terminology tagging and sub-setting
�• Terminology coding that ensures cross-�• Terminology coding that ensures cross-harmonization with key partner organizations
�• Terminolog req ests and maintenance�• Terminology requests and maintenance
�• Links to other controlled terminologies as needed(e.g. FDA, MedDRA, ISO, UCUM etc.)
�• Extending into new disease areas
2323
Erin Muhlbradte , NCI EVS
Existing CDISC data standards currently coded in NCI-EVS NCIt.
Numbers StatusCDISC Controlled Terminology
SDTM 3360 PublishedCDASH 82 PublishedADaM 26 PublishedSEND 1928 Pilot
CDISC (SDTM CDASH) M t d tCDISC (SDTM+CDASH) Metadata Domains 45 PublishedObservation Classes 200 Harmonization
V i bl 654 H i tiVariables 654 HarmonizationCDISC Disease Standards
Cardiovascular 25 Mapping in EVS
T b l i 130+ M i i EVSTuberculosis 130+ Mapping in EVS Polycystic Kidney Disease
200+Mapping in
EVS
2424
Published in .xls and .txt for download (.xml coming soon!)
Current NCI Semantic InfrastructureCurrent NCI Semantic Infrastructure
Information Models
NCI�’s
Information Models
Semantic InfrastructureData Elements
Vocabulary
//
Vocabulary
2525
https://cabig-kc.nci.nih.gov/Vocab/KC/index.php/SI_Conop_Existing_caBIG_Semantics_Implementation
Future Semantic Infrastructure
ISO
BRIDG
WikiGforgeMetadata
Eclipse Modeling Framework
WikiGforgeRepository
26
Governance
https://cabig-kc.nci.nih.gov/Vocab/KC/index.php/SI_Conop_The_Semantic_Infrastructure_View
Change Control
CDISC SHARE Project Planj
Q1 10 Q1 11 Q2 11Q2 10 Q3 10 Q4 10
TEAM 1 & 2 - REQUIREMENTS
TEAM 1 - SAFETY CONTENT
NCI Release
TEAM 1 - EFFICACY CONTENT
TEAM 2 - GOVERNANCE & METADATAPackage 1 Package 2
NCI BASED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT
EDUCATION & USER SUPPORT
1.0
USE OF THE NCI�’S �“REPOSITORY�”
GO C &MODEL
EDUCATION & USER SUPPORT
SHARE COMMUNICATION PLAN
Team 1 Tasks - 1) Safety - CDASH & SDTM initially then all applicable CDISC production standards prepared for EVS inclusion. 2) Efficacy - TB & Cardiovascular standards initially and then all applicable CDISC therapeutic area production standards prepared and included in the NCI thesaurus (NCIt).
Line denotes contingency on NCI project milestones and deliverables.
Team 2 Tasks - 1) Refine requirements and send to NCI in 2 packages (high-level Requirements and detailed requirements). 2) Establish governance for entering CDISC production standards into NCIt and refine draft governance.3) Develop a metadata model for the creation of multi-dimensional date elements.
All new CDISC safety and efficacy production standards entered into the NCIt post the CDISC consensus process
2727
All new CDISC safety and efficacy production standards entered into the NCIt post the CDISC consensus process.
Rhonda Facile , CDISC
Next StepsNext Steps
�• Complete CDISC SHARE use cases and 1st phase ofComplete CDISC SHARE use cases and 1 phase of requirements (high level)
�• Continue gathering and refining requirements�• Continue gathering and refining requirements throughout 2010 and beyond
Ali i ti CDISC t d d CDASH SDTM�• Align existing CDISC standards �– CDASH, SDTM, BRIDG, Controlled Terminology
�• Continue developing new disease-specific standards �– Infectious Diseases, Cardiovascular Disease, Oncology, Neurological Disorders
�• Accelerate CDISC standards development process
2828
Strength through collaboration.
As a catalyst for productive collaboration, CDISC brings together individuals spanning the healthcare continuum to developindividuals spanning the healthcare continuum to develop
global, open, consensus-based medical research data standards.
Special Thanks to: Margaret Haber (NCI EVS), Erin Muhlbradte (NCI EVS), Rhonda Facile (CDISC), Dave Iberson-Hurst (CDISC)
29